If the system has any audio when it reports that the definations are updated
it may cause issues with the less tech savy folks. I have a couple of home
users who's kids report parents jumping up from the system and calling one
of them when it happens. That is the home version so I don't know if
When the person telling you Mac's don't get virii and he is the one holding
the purse strings I don't argue a whole lot. We have to keep a person on
staff just to get his documents/presentations/worksheets converted to
something the Windows users can work with. I dislike the situation but I do
I've read some about the DHCP 80-20 rule but I'm not sure I really
understand it. Here are two questions.
1) Why 80-20? Why not 50-50? If one server fails, wouldn't it be
better for the other server to have a larger range from which to
distribute addresses?
2) Let's say everything is working
Here is one that I hope I can get a bit of insight on:
Desktop shortcut keeps disappearing from All Users/Desktop location
The server is Windows 2003 R2 - Setup as Terminal Services Server
No user will own up to deletion (of course...)
How can i find out who/when the shortcut is being
Wouldn't file access auditing be useful here?
BTW why do your end users have local admin, and on a TS box no less!
David Elebute wrote:
Here is one that I hope I can get a bit of insight on:
Desktop shortcut keeps disappearing from All Users/Desktop location
The server is Windows 2003 R2 -
Users DO NOT HAVE admin rights. Deleting a shortcut on a desktop does not
require admin rights either.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Lol, I agree Sherry, but I have a very opinionated developer that I'm
dealing with, and he also has the title of System Architect, which gives
him more leverage when he suggests something. Not that it means he
really knows much of anything on the subject, but there ya go...
Thanks all for the
It does from the All Users/Desktop folder. It does not from their own Desktop.
-Original Message-
From: David Elebute [mailto:deleb...@traveltechnologyservices.net]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 2:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Windows 2003 Terminal Services Server Question
At half lease time, the client should request an address *renewal*. The
renewal request would be sent to the DHCP server that provided the original
lease, it is not broadcast to DHCPServer2.
IIRC, it will not broadcast again until the lease actually expires.
(someone will jump in to correct me if
-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy
1) Why 80-20? Why not 50-50? If one server fails, wouldn't it be
better for the other server to have a larger range from which to
distribute addresses?
The 20 is designed to keep you alive and running while you fix the 80 server.
Certainly a
No, you're correct.
Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
__
Roland Schorr Tower
www.rolandschorr.com http://www.rolandschorr.com/
b...@rolandschorr.com mailto:b...@rolandschorr.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bschorr
From: Jeff Bunting
I recently got a new quad-core notebook with 8GB of ram, which forced me to
move to Vista 64bit.
Outlook is horribly slow to open, but once it does open, there are no issues.
I suspect a similar issue, but have not had a chance to really troubleshoot it.
I do know that it does not seem to
My memory says:
It retries at 50 percent of the original. If it does not get a renewal ACK then
it retries at 50 percent of that 50 percent (25 percent of the original), then
at 50 percent of that (12.5 of the original)..
Soon someone will set us both straight :)
From: Jeff Bunting
Perhaps it should (require admin rights). NTFS is your friend.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: David Elebute [mailto:deleb...@traveltechnologyservices.net]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 2:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Windows 2003 Terminal Services Server Question
Users DO
Are you sure each TS Gateway user or device requires a TS CAL? I thought you
only needed a CAL if you were going into a TS and that remote desktop
connections to desktop computers were free.
Curt
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009
My memory agrees with yours
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Kennedy, Jim
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote:
My memory says:
It retries at 50 percent of the original. If it does not get a renewal ACK
then it retries at 50 percent of that 50 percent (25 percent of the
original), then
Yes, that is what it does. But it doesn't do a broadcast - it attempts
a renewal with the original issuing DHCP server at those points.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP
Roland Schorr Tower
http://www.rolandschorr.com http://www.rolandschorr.com/
http://www.officeforlawyers.com
Perhaps someone helpfully change the permissions so that Users have the
ability to modify All Users folder?
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Joe Tinney jtin...@lastar.com wrote:
It does from the All Users/Desktop folder. It does not from their own
Desktop.
-Original Message-
From:
I still don't get the 80-20 thing. 50-50 would distribute the load
better and would potentially give you more leases if one fails. Perhaps
the hope is that the one that fails is the one with 20% and that 80%
would give you adequate addresses to be fully functional while you fix
the 20.
Thanks
I never bother with the 80-20 thing myself, if I have dual DHCP servers
(which I like to) I always try to give each a large enough address pool
to cover the entire network.
The rare exception is if I have too many devices for the subnet to be
completely split like that - i.e. 175 devices on a
I do 100-100. Each of our two DHCP servers can service the entirety
of our small network. FYI, there is a DHCP option to release the IP
address on shutdown, but we don't use that. You might try it if you
get bored.
Devin
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Jim Dandy jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu
That's a good point. You could start by using the Effective Permissions
functionality by right-clicking on the All Users\Desktop folder and
choosing Properties Security tab Advanced button Effective
Permissions tab. Enter the username and see what permissions they have.
From: Jonathan Link
Yeah, I was kinda bummed when I dug into it and found out. At least TS CALs
aren���t too expensive���
You d�t need a TS CAL to remote directly into a workstation, but you do if
you go through a TS Gateway.
From ���Licensing Windows Server 2008 Terminal Services.doc��� @
hmmm, looks like I was incorrect according to this...
From Lease Renewals
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc958919.aspx
If the client is unable to communicate with its original DHCP server, the
client waits until 87.5 percent of its lease time elapses. Then the client
enters a
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Haven't the Mac users in your network told you? Mac's don't get malware of
any type.
I had a client once who was an all Mac shop for a while. They believed that.
We were hired to install a Windows server and some
The address distribution isn't going to do much for load balancing. It is all
determined by which server answers first. That will be the busy one. I am with
the others that do 100 - 100.
DHCP clients do try to renew on reboot. They always try to renew directly with
the original server, they
Since �re still running Server 2K3,�d be looking at Terminal Server 2k3
also, correct? Or can I run TS 2k8 on a 2k3 box?
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:53 AM
To: NT System Admin
It's splitting hairs, but a Word macro virus is not a Mac virus. There were
a handful of Mac virii back in the pre-OS X days, but they were all handled
rather readily by the free Disinfectant. There have been sporadic claims of a
virii that affect Mac OS X since it came out, but once you dug
There is no equivalency, that's true, but that doesn't mean that we can ignore
the issue either. It's not a pass/fail proposition.
For my client the issue wasn't necessarily that the macro viruses affected the
Macs themselves, but rather that the macro viruses impacted the company. There
was
It is baked into the OS so you would need to upgrade your Terminal Server(s) to
2008 or install a new one for the gateway role.
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote access options
Since wre still running
Thanks to all for your knowledgable and fast responses.
Curt
-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DHCP 80-20 rule
I still don't get the 80-20 thing. 50-50 would
Your AD version needs to match the highest Terminal Server version, so that
licensing doesn't break
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
oops, just re-read the question ... and Richard's response is definitely
correct, the terminal server components must match the server core version to
install properly
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Never say never..back in the early 90's I was taking a class at our
local junior college via modem. At the intro session, someone raised the
question when told that we would be sharing documents about the possibility
of getting a virus. The instructor informed him and the rest of the class
I'll try and let you know next week when I do the install on my office
laptop.
Jon
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk b...@btrfronk.com wrote:
I recently got a new quad-core notebook with 8GB of ram, which forced me
to move to Vista 64bit.
Outlook is horribly slow to open, but
Thanks guys. At least we know we're not alone. I'd appreciate any
updates!
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook 2007/Vista/ Exchange 2003/RPC Connection Issues
I'll try and let you know next week
I went out of my way to say that I was not saying never. Today, Mac
OS X is not an attractive target for bad guys and that has a lot to do
with it. It is also true that Mac OS X is built on a pretty solid
foundation (BSD Unix, which has been around a very long time) and has a
security model that
However, when you compare the number of virii and other types of
malware that affect Windows versus those that affect Mac OS X, it is a drop
in the ocean.
but it is disingenous to suggest that there is some equivalency in the
threats against Windows and Mac OS X.
If you compare
I just received another Dell Precision Workstation M4400. Quad-core / 8GB Ram
/ Vista 64 bit. Outlook very slow to open, but works OK after.
Same issue as on two other identical notebooks.
I guess it could be a Dell issue, but seems hard to blame it on the hardware
when everything else is
You just tell him that the Grand Poobah of teh (sic) Internets said, ix-nay
on the Avast-vay.
--
ME2
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
Lol, I agree Sherry, but I have a very opinionated developer that I’m
dealing with, and he also has the title of System
Awesome close up of the chip!
From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 5:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: malware killed a chip
http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/malware-killed-this-chip.html
Anyone know anything about this? It somehow got installed on a template
machine, by our PC guy. It shows in the Add/Remove programs, but
doesn't give you any options to remove, etc.
We didn't want this, and would like to remove it. Any help would be
appreciated.
Joe Heaton
AISA
Iirc, this was part of a recent update that I got from a pc that I turned on
last night. Part of windows live perhaps?
Sent from my hand held...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rodriguez drod...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: 5/1/09 5:54
Can't you do a System Restore before this got installed?
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
Anyone know anything about this? It somehow got installed on a template
machine, by our PC guy. It shows in the Add/Remove programs, but doesn’t
give you any
That it is -- any notion of what the particular malware was?? Must've been
a real killer!
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Steven Calvanese
scalvan...@membersolutions.com wrote:
Awesome close up of the chip!
--
*From:* Alex Eckelberry
Interesting! I thought the 2650 had about 6 thermo sensors? But, they
can probably be disabled, or fail.
From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: malware killed a chip
I think is pretty shady, pushing an update without people having the chance
to deny it.
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
From: Louis, Joe [mailto:jlo...@guardianalarm.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Office Live Workspace
Iirc,
I think it was optional, and might have even been part of an O2k7 update.
Sent from my hand held...
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: 5/1/09 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: Office Live Workspace
I think
Well, not to sound condensending, I usually set my laptop so that it does
the download but I choose from Express to Manual and choose what I need
installed. If you have a Restore Point you can choose from a point before
the updates were installed. But, that is if you have Restore Point turned
on.
It is not one of the updates that loads by default (critical, etc.). It is one
of the optional (extra) updates. Sounds like your PC guy has himself a happy
clicking finger.
TVK
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 5:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Whats the version #? I am on 7100 right now ..
From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauth...@lastar.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 7 RC
All,
I've been waiting to see if any one reported. Will the beta keys work
with the RC?
Thanks!
+1 It was optional.
But since we are on the subject, why did updates come out on the 28th? Isn't
that 'out of band'?
From: Tim Vander Kooi [tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Office Live
Check identical files 3 - 28 bucks shareware.
http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Utilities/Disk_Analysis_Utilities/Check_I
dentical_Files.html
I have a client that took 5 years of data into sharepoint ran it for a year
hated it, extracted it and then wanted me to clean up dupes / versions.
Don't forget also that when a broadcast goes out to a dhcp server whichever
responds first is where that pc stays with, now, if too many hit the dhcp
server you will simply 'get denied' it won't rebroadcast to another dhcp
server. Just like dns, a negative response is still a response.
For this
The RC is build 7100.
Benjamin Zachary - Lists wrote:
Whats the version #? I am on 7100 right now ..
--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Proxmox appliance, free for single domain. I use the pro version with about
20 clients, 50+ domains, and maybe 2,000 mailboxes. Runs without a hitch.
Requires almost 0 maintenance and is offsite.
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jd...@xpresstel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:09 AM
To: NT
Are there any printers installed that Outlook might be trying to connect to
when starting up?
Any change it might be slow/fast network detection?
Otherwise, maybe stick Process Explorer onto it, and see if the main
outlook.exe thread is sitting waiting for something..
Cheers
Ken
Hi All,
I am looking for a good solution to backup multiple windows workstations in
a central and organized way.
I am familiar with Retrospect, Veritas Netbackup and Amanda. I was
wondering if the list had a preferred solution.
Shawn
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
Just aguess... Perhaps you are logged in as a user that does not have
permissions to uninstall??
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
Anyone know anything about this? It somehow got installed on a template
machine, by our PC guy. It shows in the Add/Remove
I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor their
lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.
The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
We use Kaseya to manage client desktops and it has integrated remote support
vie RDP/VNC/PCAnywhere depending on the client host and the what we set. While
it's not as sophisticated as citrix/TS or a firewall based routed product we
can deploy it to a site in 10 minute and have clients remotely
On 28 Apr 2009 at 13:59, Kurt Buff wrote:
Password Safe, or Keepass - and I believe each has a version available for
PDAs.
I wish ... Palm OS is unfortunately not on the list. Roboform's Palm support
is not that great either, requires Goodsync and a Palm unit with an external
memory card.
Good afternoon all - and happy bank holidays!
I have a 2003 SBS network all with Dell Optiplex's running Windows XP SP3.
There is a policy that should make all the PC's screensavers kick in after
10 minutes and then lock the machine, but its not working, I assume there is
something preventing
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Gavin Wilby gavin.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
Good afternoon all - and happy bank holidays!
Happy Mailman Day! ;-)
There is a policy that should make all the PC's screensavers kick in after
10 minutes and then lock the machine, but its not working, I assume there
Try and install a working version without the full SQL.
Jon
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
I was just not happen that our resellar did not make the SQL
requirement clear up front.
I am just reading the installation Guide and it
Do you have all 3 of these enabled?
If no screensaver is selected on the computer the timeout will not
apply. If you set the policy as above, if there is no screensaver
selected the computer will go straight into the Locked mode.
From: Gavin
All,
I've been waiting to see if any one reported. Will the beta keys work
with the RC?
Thanks!
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Yeah,
I read some more last night. The component that manages non server clients
needs SQL 2005. The console that could only manage server components can use
SQL2000+ and Express.
What's worse is the Beta for the next version needs SQL and SCOM from what I
read.
Lame...
jlc
From: Jon Harris
I know some of you are probably doing this. Hoping for some help. I'm
trying to pull some data from our SAV parent server (10.1.7). The data
for each client is kept in the registry on the parent, here:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\INTEL\LANDesk\VirusProtect6\CurrentVersion\Cli
Thank you all for the help. I'll look into Kaseya, Timbuktu and Apple
remote desktop.
RS
From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 2:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote access options
We use Kaseya to manage client desktops and it has
Yes. At least it did for me.
From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauth...@lastar.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 6:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 7 RC
All,
I've been waiting to see if any one reported. Will the beta keys work
with the RC?
Thanks!
~ Finally,
I was under the impression that like the current version of Forefront if you
did not have one of the System Center products it would install a cut down
version that only dealt with Forefront. From what I saw on my installation
the reason for SQL WAS the MOM package. I just hope that Sterling
for what it's worth, on the technet download site, the keys are listed for
'Beta and RC'
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauth...@lastar.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows
Yes
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gauthier jgauth...@lastar.com
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:52:19
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Windows 7 RC
All,
I've been waiting to see if
Is there any tools, any scripts, etc. that will allow me to manage multiple
snapshot schedules. What I would like to do is, keep 12 snap shots in a 24 hour
period, 2 snaps in a 48 hour period, and than 1 snap going back each day for 1
week and than 1 snap per week going baclk 3 months. (will
Since there are a number of folks apparently running Macs in their
networks, I was wondering what everybody is using to protect them from
Malware. Are some products better, easier to manage smaller footprint
than others?
Thanks for any insight.
Bill
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
Haven't the Mac users in your network told you? Mac's don't get malware of
any type.
Seriously that was what I keep getting told, so we don't buy any malware
protection for them, but I think Symantec, MacAffe., and others of the big
names might have some.
Jon
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
We don't have any Macs on our network here, but I do use a Mac
personally. It is essentially true that there is no malware on the Mac.
The stuff that does pop up is almost always a trojan, and the person has
to explicitly have permitted it to run (Do you want to install this
pirated copy of
+1 ClamAV at home.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Mayo, Bill bem...@pittcountync.gov wrote:
We don't have any Macs on our network here, but I do use a Mac
personally. It is essentially true that there is no malware on the Mac.
The stuff that does pop up is almost always a trojan, and the
+2 ClamAV at our colo.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 ClamAV at home.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Mayo, Bill bem...@pittcountync.govwrote:
We don't have any Macs on our network here, but I do use a Mac
personally. It is essentially
I take it from the lack of replies that no one is using Avast? In a
way, that's good, as I really don't want to do a lot of research into
it, but on the other hand, I don't have any ammo against it either...
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
From: Joe Heaton
Have a client that is having trouble with Internet connectivity and Exchange
sending mail externally.
Has a SBS 2003 server up to date as of two weeks ago, nothing changed since
then that I know of or can see. They can send and receive internal Exchange
just fine. Receiving mail externally
We use McAfee. Centrally managed by corporate office through epo. Used
to be a very manual install, but the software can now be push
installed and updated to Macs as well as Windows pcs.
On 5/1/09, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote:
+2 ClamAV at our colo.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:06
How is external DNS set up? Forwarders? Root hints? I usually use
forwarders. See if you can ping the listed forwarders; then try a Nslookup
using those IPs as the server. Any firewall rules that might have been
inadvertently changed? It sounds like DNS queries aren't getting replies
from outside.
Do your macintosh users not share files and emails with your PC users?
soapbox mode engaged I have been supporting a multi-platform environment
for 15+ years. We have been running AV on our Macs for the last 10. Not only
do Macs get exposed to viruses that they can be infected with, they
I'm using it with WSUS and AD for about 2500 clients. I'm reasonably happy
with it. I wish I could get better reports out of it though. It's very good
about giving you all the information you want about a specific thing, but a
report for all the blocked/cleaned files for all the machines for April
Trojans *are* malware. And, the first botnet for Macs has been activated:
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/041709-first-mac-os-x-botnet.html
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 08:03, Mayo, Bill bem...@pittcountync.gov wrote:
We don't have any Macs on our network here, but I do use a Mac personally.
When you create the default snap schedule, I believe it just creates a
scheduled task that shows up in control panel. You should be able to modify
the schedule there to do what you want. You need to click the option to show
multiple schedules and then with the advanced button you can make up
Sorry, no just use it at home...seems to be OK there.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
I take it from the lack of replies that no one is using Avast? In a way,
that’s good, as I really don’t want to do a lot of research into it, but on
the other hand, I
Thats the problem, i already created schedule but I need it to cycle out
certain snaps. Like I take snaps every 2 hours each day, but the next day I
want those snaps to go away. And then the ones I take every 6 hours, I want
those to go away ever 2 days. And the ones I take once a day for a
I would think that if no one is using it, then that would be ammo against
it.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
I take it from the lack of replies that no one is using Avast? In a way,
that’s good, as I really don’t want to do a lot of research into
Forgot to mention. DNS is set to use Forwarders. Originally had Qwest DNS
servers and switched to OpenDNS servers. Same result. I can ping forwarders
by IP but not by name. No firewall rules changed.
Internal DNS works fine. Ping a workstation by name and it resolves.
I'll see what Netmon shows.
Can you do NSLookup and set server=the external server IP and get a DNS
query reply? If not, the firewall may well be blocking the DNS traffic. What
DNS servers are you using? Send an IP and I'll try a query from here to make
sure the server is working...
***
Charlie Kaiser
I've seen it on a couple home machines I've worked on. Both were eaten
up with malware, and the Avast active protection really bogged the
machines down.
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076 x388
_
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
We had one client that was using it in the Enterprise and it worked, but
the console was convoluted. Its updates required reboots constantly
both server and workstation side and its performance drawbacks were not
as bad as Symantec, but still very noticeable.
Lots of home users were using it,
That's the one thing I remember from back in the day of using it at
home, it ALWAYS requested reboots. Highly annoying.
From: gswe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:gswe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Stirling does not require SCOM, but rather contains the SCOM agent (much the
way that FFCS uses the MOM agent). If you are using SCOM already, then the SCOM
agent that already exists on your clients will work with Stirling. I cannot get
a straight answer from Microsoft regarding whether the
Any chance someone was running a migration tool like USMT in your
environment?
-Original Message-
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: strange profiles on server
Bit perplexed with this one.
{{{resists the urge to comment on government spending}}}
Realize that it is all relative, the cost of Citrix isn't that bad. We deal
with quite a few government agencies nationwide and I've been surprised by the
number of them that are using Citrix already. It's easier on them because of
the
Essentially true. That was intended to mean that there is very little
malware, and that is the case. With a little common sense, you can pretty much
avoid it entirely.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:30 AM
To: NT System
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
