ril 2011 10:07 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
>
>
> With the huge sizes hard drives can reach, is RAID5 still better than, say,
> mirrored drives? Or some other way. Our consultants want RAID5 for every
> - Original Message -
> From: Crawford, Scott
> [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
> Sent: Mon, 11 Apr 2011
> 10:27:54 -0700
> Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
>
> >
us... until very recently.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Crawford, Scott
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 11 Apr 2011
10:27:54 -0700
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid
Theoretically, you could lose half your drives without failure with RAID1...but
they need to be the "right" half.
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
RAID1 you l
lose a single drive without
failure.
So you need to weigh up whether you need perf or space.
Chees
Ken
From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:dholst...@nbm.org]
Sent: Monday, 11 April 2011 10:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
With the huge sizes hard drives can
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
With the huge sizes hard drives can reach, is RAID5 still better than, say,
mirrored drives? Or some other way. Our consultants want RAID5 for every
server...
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 6:47 PM
: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
I opt for the green M&M's.
--
ME2
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Ens
mailto:stevey...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You choose the red pill, or the blue pill...sometimes I opt for the green one.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jonathan Link
ma
gt; John Cook 4/8/2011 12:48 PM >>>
>>> (Jedi hand wave) You don't need to see our credentials, we're free to
>>> go...
>>> John W. Cook
>>> Systems Administrator
>>> Partnership for Strong Families
>>>
>>> - Or
ss device
> --
> *From: * Steve Ens
> *Date: *Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:45:30 -0500
> *To: *NT System Admin Issues
> *ReplyTo: * "NT System Admin Issues" <
> ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> *Subject: *Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> You choose
Older you get the blue pill is the best option
Typed frustratingly slowly on my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:45:30
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding R
W. Cook
>> Systems Administrator
>> Partnership for Strong Families
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Bill Humphries
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Sent: Fri Apr 08 15:40:48 2011
>> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>>
>&
-
> From: Bill Humphries
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Fri Apr 08 15:40:48 2011
> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> crap. should i really know what AM you are talking about?
>
> bill
>
> Steven M. Caesare wrote:
> >
> > **Ahem.**
&
ystems Administrator
>> Partnership for Strong Families
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Bill Humphries
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Sent: Fri Apr 08 15:40:48 2011
>> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>>
>> crap. shoul
t; Partnership for Strong Families
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Bill Humphries
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Sent: Fri Apr 08 15:40:48 2011
>> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>>
>> crap. should i really know what AM you
> (Jedi hand wave) You don't need to see our credentials, we're free to
> go...
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
> Partnership for Strong Families
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Bill Humphries
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Fri Apr
lies
- Original Message -
From: Bill Humphries
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Fri Apr 08 15:40:48 2011
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
crap. should i really know what AM you are talking about?
bill
Steven M. Caesare wrote:
>
> **Ahem.**
>
>
>
> -sc
>
>
&
(Jedi hand wave) You don't need to see our credentials, we're free to go...
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Bill Humphries
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Fri Apr 08 15:40:48 2011
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuild
Nothing to see here. Move along...
-sc
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 3:41 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> crap. should i really know what AM
Missed it by that || much.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote:
> **Ahem.**
>
>
>
> -sc
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2011 1:52 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Sub
crap. should i really know what AM you are talking about?
bill
Steven M. Caesare wrote:
**Ahem.**
-sc
*From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2011 1:52 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Yes, you&#x
*Ahem.*
-sc
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Yes, you're the Um, no, it's currently down for everyone.
ASB (Professional Bio <ht
FTFY
-sc
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
It's still AM here too, but that's not what he meant...
John, we snubbed you... :P
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:47
Why, whatever are you talking about, Mr. Cook?
-sc
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Speaking of softballs, am I the only one not getting AM emails
John W. Cook
RAID220 or 221... whatever it takes.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Would you prefer RAID6 or RAID10? Practically, what would you
ave it on it's own dedicated
>> server with plenty of disk space on-board and back that up to the SAN.
:-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:24 P
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
I thought we'd disabused you of the notion that you need a [high end] SAN?
Granted the high end ones are nice and they have their use
r? With Windows
>>>>>> Server
>>>>>> 2008 R2 having access to the iSCSI target software MS recently released,
>>>>>> that becomes an option now, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at
, April 08, 2011 1:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
It's still AM here too, but that's not what he meant...
John, we unsubbed you... :P
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Joseph Heaton
mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov>> wrote:
Still in the AM here...if
MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP**4, VTSP4*
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2011 1:44 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
>
>
> There's only so much of your d
t;
>>>>> jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah I was keeping that in mind... Very good points to consider,
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>> :-) Mostly just going to be storing stuff that is primaril
gt;
> From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:44 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> There's only so much of your day that can be taken up by softball.
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM
-Original Message-
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: 08 April 2011 17:13
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> Would you prefer RAID6 or RAID10? Practically, what would you accept --
> RAID 5, RAID 6,
> MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
>
> From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:44 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> There's only so much of your day that can be taken up by softbal
t;>> too.
>>>>> :-) Mostly just going to be storing stuff that is primarily used for
>>>>> reference and things like that. At least that's how we're using our
>>>>> file
>>>>> server now. Very little "writing"
e
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
There's only so
t;> Yeah I was keeping that in mind... Very good points to consider,
>>>> too.
>>>> :-) Mostly just going to be storing stuff that is primarily used for
>>>> reference and things like that. At least that's how we're using our file
>>>>
oring stuff that is primarily used for
>>> reference and things like that. At least that's how we're using our file
>>> server now. Very little "writing" going on, but a lot of "reading" of
>>> files.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&
[mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
There's only so much of your day that can be taken up by softball.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Don Ely
mailto:don@gmail.com>> wrote:
Why are you try
t;> server now. Very little "writing" going on, but a lot of "reading" of
>>> files.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
>>> Sent: Fri
d the likes.
I wouldn't let the RAID level be your deciding factor, but of course it
plays a part.
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: 08 April 2011 17:55
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Yeah I was
least that's how we're using our file
>> server now. Very little "writing" going on, but a lot of "reading" of
>> files.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
>>
toring stuff that is primarily used for
>> reference and things like that. At least that's how we're using our file
>> server now. Very little "writing" going on, but a lot of "reading" of
>> files.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Origina
ast that's how we're using our file
>> server now. Very little "writing" going on, but a lot of "reading" of
>> files.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
>
l.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:47 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> If you're using Exchange 2010 then you're still not going to be pushing
> a lot of IOPS. It could be more of an issue if you had a SQL or
Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
If you're using Exchange 2010 then you're still not going to be pushing
a lot of IOPS. It could be more of an issue
f "reading" of files.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
If you're using Exchange 2010 then you're still not going to be pus
@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: 08 April 2011 17:42
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Well, I don't think we'll have a whole lot of IOPS, unless / until I
bring email in-house, in which case I might just have it on it's own
dedicated server with ple
Please respond to
"NT System Admin Issues"
To
"NT System Admin Issues"
Press this button if the "To" is a fax number. Enter in the fax number like
123-456-7890.
cc
Subject
RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
IF your contro
AID6.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: 08 April 2011 17:13
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> Would you prefer RAID6 or RAID10? Practically, what would you accept
lto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
You need to weigh up price vs. performance needs vs. risk tolerance.
RAID6 is fantastic for data reliability, but if your workload is write
intensive you're p
ot;NT System Admin Issues"
To
"NT System Admin Issues"
Press this button if the "To" is a fax number. Enter in the fax number
like 123-456-7890.
cc
Subject
RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
IF your controller supports it, ADG (RAID6) is even better than RAID5 +
April 2011 17:13
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Would you prefer RAID6 or RAID10? Practically, what would you accept --
RAID 5, RAID 6, what? Just trying to think ahead for when I have a
chance to order a SAN.
-Original Message-
From: John Hornb
: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Our new servers are ordered that way.
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Our new servers are ordered that way.
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
IF your controller supports it, ADG (RAID6) is even better than
s
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 1:03 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> No hot spare.
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
>
t; Systems Administrator
> Partnership for Strong Families
>
> --
> *From*: richardmccl...@aspca.org
> *To*: NT System Admin Issues
> *Sent*: Thu Apr 07 13:07:32 2011
>
> *Subject*: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
>
> What does Dell Server Support sa
would currently not be seeing any
> rebuilds with the drive you already replaced...
>
> I'd recommend against it.
>
> -sc
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:58 PM
> >
: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 1:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
If you don't have a hot spare then NO!
If you do have a hot spare, then it should have kicked in when the
previous drive failed, and yo
IF your controller supports it, ADG (RAID6) is even better than RAID5 +
spare, IMO.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
I&#x
pfsf.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 1:03 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> No hot spare.
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
> Partnership for Strong Families
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Steven
il 07, 2011 1:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
No hot spare.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Steven M. Caesare
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Apr 07 13:01:32 2011
Subject: RE: Opini
Nice to hear someone else doing that. When I go out of town for training or
conferences I also take my bike.
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 1:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Well
Well at $.52 a mile I may just ride the motorcycle to work and enjoy the day!
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Heaton
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Apr 07 13:31:45 2011
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
r
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Miguel Gonzalez
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Apr 07 13:12:21 2011
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
There is a CentOS live CD from Dell called OMSA that can be used for
certain models to run updates, BIOS upgrades and certain firmware
updates
12:21 2011
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
There is a CentOS live CD from Dell called OMSA that can be used for certain
models to run updates, BIOS upgrades and certain firmware updates. It also has
the dset and online diags on it but you can configure a network interface and
SSH the syst
--- El jue, 7/4/11, richardmccl...@aspca.org
escribió:
De: richardmccl...@aspca.org
Asunto: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
Para: "NT System Admin Issues"
Fecha: jueves, 7 de abril, 2011 13:07
What does Dell Server Support say? I
can't remember the details, but a firmware
Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Apr 07 13:07:32 2011
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
What does Dell Server Support say? I can't remember the details, but a
firmwa
Pretty much what I figured but I needed a consensus.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Bob Hartung
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Apr 07 13:04:58 2011
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
I think you'll hos
What does Dell Server Support say? I can't remember the details, but a
firmware and OpenManage upgrade later, my "failed drive" was back up and
running. I can't remember the details because it was 2-3 years ago. This
was a 2550 which whose service contract had run out like 3 years
previously
) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
_
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:58:01 -0500
Subject: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
So I have a Dell 2850 with 6 drives in raid 5 an
Then do NOT fail a second drive before the first is finished rebuilding.
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 1:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
No hot spare.
John W. Cook
Systems
+ 1 billion
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 1:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
If you don't have a hot spare then NO!
If you do have a hot spare, then it should have k
No hot spare.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Steven M. Caesare
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Apr 07 13:01:32 2011
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
If you don't have a hot spare then NO!
If you do have
> From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:58 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
>
> So I have a Dell 2850 with 6 drives in raid 5 and one completely
failed and
> another is predicted to according to t
So I have a Dell 2850 with 6 drives in raid 5 and one completely failed and
another is predicted to according to the OpenManage software. I replaced the
failed one and it's rebuilding but I was wondering if anyone has an opinion on
whether or not I can replace the suspect drive before the other
75 matches
Mail list logo
