RE: Site to Site VPN?

I use several here for HQ firewall/AV/spam and smaller units for site to site VPN. You can also do advanced stuff by CLI, although I rarely have a need. The CLI is easy to use, too. I like the "backrev" firmware option where a firmware update can be undone if needed (haven't n

RE: Site to Site VPN?

Admin Issues Cc: Sam Cayze Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Best of luck. Let us know the results. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Thanks Steven, I

RE: Site to Site VPN?

Best of luck. Let us know the results. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Thanks Steven, I am very impressed so far. Their documentation is top

RE: Site to Site VPN?

12, 2009 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? There are a number of options - you will need to talk with a sales rep. When I evaluated multiple different firewalls (sonicwall, fortinet, firebox, etc) the FG came out on top.The FG folks got me a an eval unit, and I fell

RE: Site to Site VPN?

that using another product like websense. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Steve, the Fortinet 60B looks perfect, I like the PC Card for EVDO card

RE: Site to Site VPN?

, March 06, 2009 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Try using Fortigate units (even the 60bs) from fortinet. I love them. They work well, and the site to site is great. I am running a few offices off of them. Including VoIP. Good stuff. And the interface is pretty

RE: Site to Site VPN?

) 766-4185Cell gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com www.abideinternational.com -Original Message- From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 5:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Why spend that when you could do it with a

RE: Site to Site VPN?

...@rollouts.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Site to Site VPN? We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near future for a small office, about 20 users. Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? I

R: Site to Site VPN?

. The response time for a failure of the line is 48 working hours max. for DSL connection vs. 4 working hours for HDSL. GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Inviato: venerdì 6 marzo 2009 16.50 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Site to Site VPN? I

RE: Site to Site VPN?

It was overkill for our shop and 8x more expensive than a normal internet pipe. From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: Site to Site VPN? What was bad ? GuidoElia HELPPC

Re: Site to Site VPN?

I second the SonicWALL site to site VPN connections. They are 100% better with support and the wizards do make creating the connections much easier. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Sam Cayze wrote: > We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near > future for a

R: Site to Site VPN?

What was bad ? GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Inviato: venerdì 6 marzo 2009 16.35 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Site to Site VPN? Actually the reason I need this is because we are getting rid of a mpls site to site connection... Thanks

RE: Site to Site VPN?

Site VPN? Go with MPLS and 2 Cisco routers (1800 or 2800 series) GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Inviato: giovedì 5 marzo 2009 20.54 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Site to Site VPN? We may be needing a VPN connection to

Site to Site VPN?

: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Site to Site VPN? Because DSL/Cable have limited uplink bandwidth, generally. From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Why spend that when you could

RE: Site to Site VPN?

...@mortonwelding.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Generally but depending on requirements it could be ok for him. We are running an offsite warehouse with computers, ip phones, network printers, etc with Cable at their end and DSL

RE: Site to Site VPN?

#x27;s now. From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 7:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Because DSL/Cable have limited uplink bandwidth, generally. From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com] Se

RE: Site to Site VPN?

Because DSL/Cable have limited uplink bandwidth, generally. From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonwelding.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN? Why spend that when you could do it with a couple ASA's and DSL/Cable Connec

RE: Site to Site VPN?

Why spend that when you could do it with a couple ASA's and DSL/Cable Connections. From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R: Site to Site VPN? Go with MPLS and 2 Cisco routers (18

R: Site to Site VPN?

Go with MPLS and 2 Cisco routers (1800 or 2800 series) GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Inviato: giovedì 5 marzo 2009 20.54 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Site to Site VPN? We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near

Re: Site to Site VPN?

My experience is that things have not changed much on that front. As of last August Linksys gear was still slow and unreliable. Ben Scott wrote: > It between 2001 and 2004. LinkSys might have been acquired by Cisco > during this time span, but Cisco certainly hadn't had a chance to > effect an

Re: Site to Site VPN?

Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:21 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN? > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze wrote: >  > Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? > >  Not that one in particular, but I've had exp

RE: Site to Site VPN?

Admin Issues Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN? On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze wrote:  > Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? Not that one in particular, but I've had exposure to a few different LinkSys encryption boxes in the past, and they'

Re: Site to Site VPN?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Sam Cayze wrote: > So this was pre-2003?  (When Linksys was acquired by Cisco?) It between 2001 and 2004. LinkSys might have been acquired by Cisco during this time span, but Cisco certainly hadn't had a chance to effect any real change yet. But again, I haven'

RE: Site to Site VPN?

So this was pre-2003? (When Linksys was acquired by Cisco?) Any good recommendations? -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN? On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM

Re: Site to Site VPN?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze wrote:  > Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? Not that one in particular, but I've had exposure to a few different LinkSys encryption boxes in the past, and they've all sucked. Inadequate processing power (slow). Bad docume

RE: Site to Site VPN?

p on there: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Site to Site VPN? We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in

Re: Site to Site VPN?

e first place I looked. > > I appreciate the input. > > -Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:43 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN? > > Also, with

RE: Site to Site VPN?

chealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:43 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN? Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5 minutes to go through the wizards on each end to build the site-2-site VPN. It was super-easy. On

Re: Site to Site VPN?

Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5 minutes to go through the wizards on each end to build the site-2-site VPN. It was super-easy. One negative thing that I definately have to throw out there, is that the CMD line interface (if thats you preference) is horrible,

Re: Site to Site VPN?

I just recently asked the list about Site to Site VPN solutions. It's called "Site to Site VPN... What works?" Check out them in the archives: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/search/results?forum=ntsysadmin&words=Site+to+Site+VPN...+What+works?&sb=1 We ended up

Re: Site to Site VPN?

No experience with that model, but I can say that current SonicWALL devices are very easy to site-2-site VPN. Their support for me in the past year has been very easy to deal with. -- ME2 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze wrote: > We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data

Site to Site VPN?

We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near future for a small office, about 20 users. Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? I tried a SonicWall once, it was way over my head, and support was horrendous. This will operate solely as 2

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

Looks like the Netscreen series is EOL. It is the SSG series now. Price a little more than $500 now...LOL -Original Message- From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? I

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

. -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Site to Site VPN... What works? Greetings List, I've got a small lab of computers offsite. I want to be able to access them for support fr

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

on working. I do want all traffic > between the two sites encrypted, > > I've looked at IPSec and OpenVPN. For our situation, neither worked well. So, > I figured I'd ask the list: > > What is a good Site to Site VPN solution? > > Qualifications we're looking fo

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

9:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? +1, although I will admit to being a Cisco bigot along with Aaron. Shook -Original Message- From: Rohyans, Aaron [mailto:arohy...@dpsciences.com] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:35 AM To: NT System Admin

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

+1, although I will admit to being a Cisco bigot along with Aaron. Shook -Original Message- From: Rohyans, Aaron [mailto:arohy...@dpsciences.com] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? Cisco ASA 5505 @ $350

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

7134 arohy...@dpsciences.com http://www.dpsciences.com/ -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works? +1 on this. I've benchmarked the linksys

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

: Thursday, February 26, 2009 7:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? We have a Cisco 3000 Concentrator at one end and a Cisco 3002 Hardware Client at the other end. Was easy to setup and haven't had any problems with the tunnel dropping. Although, won't b

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

Another thing you can try is ClarkConnect. They provide a firewall, content filtering, vpn and the list continues. You can use the free version or pay for a license, which only cost us around $160 for one license. ___ Cameron Cooper IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

ere(Philly) and 1 there(Phoenix). Thanks, Jake Gardner TTC Network Administrator Ext. 246 -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Site to Site VPN... What works? Gree

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

We have a Cisco 3000 Concentrator at one end and a Cisco 3002 Hardware Client at the other end. Was easy to setup and haven't had any problems with the tunnel dropping. Although, won't be able to get it for under $1,000. Could try looking for used Cisco equipment and try that. _

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

The Sonicwalls do work and are pretty simple to setup too, btw. For free though, I will take a pfsense vm with load balancer. Includes rrd graphs and bandwidth meters and traffic shaping. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

+1 on this. I've benchmarked the linksys WRT54G against other comparible models before, it it rated at the bottom of the list when depending on hardware encryption performance. I like it as a home routing device, but I dont recommend it for site-to-site when performance needs to be maximized. --

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

TP) was around 5Mbps: http://forums.speedguide.net/archive/index.php/t-242584.html -Derek -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works? I don'

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

rone.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:58 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? > > +1 on the SonicWALL. > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftw

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

rone.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:58 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? > > +1 on the SonicWALL. > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftw

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

+1 on the SonicWALL. Site-to-site VPN is as easy as pie... -- ME2 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Derek Lidbom wrote: > +1 on the SonicWALL. > > My only question, if you're going to try 2 TZ180's talking to each other > (the easiest to implement), is would the one at y

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

o:dlid...@trone.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? +1 on the SonicWALL. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

I don't know if I would go that route, just on a basis of CPU "horsepower". Most of the options I listed have either hardware cryptographic accelerators or enough horsepower to do it in software. The Linksys WRT54G(L) boxes have very, very weak CPUs and do not possess the necessary hardware accel

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

> From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:17 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works? > > SonicWALL TZ 180 - US $340 via NewEgg > Cisco 851 - US $250 (not for the faint of heart, IM

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

VPN doesn't add complications with that). -Derek -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works? SonicWALL TZ 180 - US $340 via NewEgg Cisco 851 - US

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

SonicWALL TZ 180 - US $340 via NewEgg Cisco 851 - US $250 (not for the faint of heart, IMO the web interface is worthless) Cisco 1711 - under US $100 on eBay - again, not for the faint of heart Old PIII PC with 2 NICs and m0n0wall Matthew W. Ross wrote: > 1. Cheap, as in less than $1000. 2. Easy t

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Site to Site VPN... What works? Greetings List, I've got a small lab of computers offsit

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

I user Fortinet SOHO units for some small offices on cable modem needing site-to-site VPN to our HQ units. They should speak to other non-Fortinet firewalls just fine since your HQ unit probably isn't Fortinet. They are I think $300- $600 depending on the model and options. The For

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

+1 pfsense is rock solid IMO -Original Message- From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN... What works? Check out pfSense (www.pfsense.org) - I've had fantastic su

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

chool District > > > - Original Message - > From: Kurt Buff > [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > To: NT System Admin Issues > [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] > Sent: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 > 16:16:05 -0800 > Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works? &g

RE: Site to Site VPN... What works?

ginal Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN... What works? I re-read my post, yeah, I left some details out: I tried linux hosted OpenVPN and IPSec with varying degre

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

WatchGuard with some success, what issues do you have with it? --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:16:05 -0800 Subject:

Re: Site to Site VPN... What works?

twork solution working. I do want all traffic > between the two sites encrypted, > > I've looked at IPSec and OpenVPN. For our situation, neither worked well. So, > I figured I'd ask the list: > > What is a good Site to Site VPN solution? > > Qualifications we're

Site to Site VPN... What works?

27;ve looked at IPSec and OpenVPN. For our situation, neither worked well. So, I figured I'd ask the list: What is a good Site to Site VPN solution? Qualifications we're looking for (In order of importance): 1. Cheap, as in less than $1000. 2. Easy to use. Somebody with basic routing kn

Re: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing

, > > I'm trying to connect two customer sites via a site-to-site VPN so that all > machines at Site A can be forced to go through a proxy server at Site B to > access the Internet. > > I am toying with the idea of placing both sites on the same network (i.e. > 10.2.0.0/16) and

RE: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing

AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing Could you deny http and https outbound traffic on the router at Site A except over the VPN to Site B, and then set Site A machines’ web browsers to use the proxy server at site B? _ From: Erik Goldoff [mai

RE: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing

2008 9:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing "if the Site A machines don't use their local VPN device as their gateway" why NOT use the VPN tunnel device as default gateway? sounds like that what you want

RE: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing

Issues Subject: site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing Hi guys, I'm trying to connect two customer sites via a site-to-site VPN so that all machines at Site A can be forced to go through a proxy server at Site B to access the Internet. I am toying with the idea of placing both sites on t

site-to-site VPN for proxy sharing

Hi guys, I'm trying to connect two customer sites via a site-to-site VPN so that all machines at Site A can be forced to go through a proxy server at Site B to access the Internet. I am toying with the idea of placing both sites on the same network (i.e. 10.2.0.0/16) and then providin

RE: site-to-site VPN question

TED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 11:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: site-to-site VPN question When you implement a site-to-site VPN between firewalls, does this affect routes?   Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA  95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL

RE: site-to-site VPN question

NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: site-to-site VPN question Short answer "yes" but what are you driving at? If you implement a site-to-site, you have to tell the firewalls to forward the traffic destined for the other site directly to the other firewall, via the tunnel or it will use

Re: site-to-site VPN question

No Standard IPsec VPNs use IP subnet(s) defined in the SA (security association) to determine which packet goes where. Joe Heaton wrote: > When you implement a site-to-site VPN between firewalls, does this > affect routes? -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Gene

RE: site-to-site VPN question

Sounds like a pretty vague question... any more details available? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: site-to-site VPN question When you implement a site-to-site VPN

RE: site-to-site VPN question

ls are you dealing with? Shook http://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshook From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: site-to-site VPN question When you implement a site-to-site V

site-to-site VPN question

When you implement a site-to-site VPN between firewalls, does this affect routes? Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ <http://www.sunb

RE: Seeking Hardware Advice for Site to Site VPN

WE use the Nortel Contivity boxes. Have installed many in customer sites. From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 9:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Seeking Hardware Advice for Site to Site VPN I like

RE: Seeking Hardware Advice for Site to Site VPN

I like Sonicwall devices myself, they are pretty straight forward. The netscreens would be a good option. Watchguards are ok on the lower end, but after my last dealings with a firebox, I think that's pretty ridiculous and would never recommend one. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/A

Re: Seeking Hardware Advice for Site to Site VPN

devices can be centrally managed as well. Fred Sawyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/18/2008 05:07 PM Please respond to "NT System Admin Issues" To "NT System Admin Issues" cc Subject Seeking Hardware Advice for Site to Site VPN I am currently reviewing lower cos

Re: Seeking Hardware Advice for Site to Site VPN

On 18 Jan 2008 at 17:07, Fred Sawyer wrote: > I am currently reviewing lower cost hardware solutions for a site to site > VPN for a remote office. The top contender I see so far would be the > Sonicwall TZ Series. > > Any one with hands on time willing to offer up some input o

Seeking Hardware Advice for Site to Site VPN

I am currently reviewing lower cost hardware solutions for a site to site VPN for a remote office. The top contender I see so far would be the Sonicwall TZ Series. Any one with hands on time willing to offer up some input on these devices. Are they easy to configure? Do they have a stable