hi,
agree with http://people.apache.org/~wave/content/favicon.ico
thanks
mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com
Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8,
Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193,
P.R.China
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Oct 13, 2011 11:58 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
The legacy OpenOffice.org project had an instance [1] of a source code
searching, cross reference application called OpenGrok[2]. It is
very useful, especially in a 6
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Thank you Robert you've been very clear, but ...
--- On Thu, 10/13/11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
...
Please jump in where I've been unclear)
...
It is vital that only the owner (or their agent) alters a
copyright
+1 for your favicon.
Marcus
Am 10/14/2011 04:23 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
On 10/13/2011 9:56 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon
rather than an official OOo/AOOo favicon?
Because
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
The legacy OpenOffice.org project had an instance [1] of a source code
searching, cross reference application called OpenGrok[2]. It is
very useful, especially in a 6 million LOC project like OOo...
I'm not on the
The press@ team has a new blog entry/announce@ about general issues
around the transition from the previous OpenOffice.org project to the
new Apache OpenOffice.org podling.
http://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_statement
(Argh, my mail client may have wrapped
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
It is vital that only the owner (or their agent) alters a copyright
notice unless specific written permission been granted.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
snip
Honestly, I see clear answers from legal-discuss for only a small
fraction of the questions that are submitted. I don't know if we're
misusing that list or what. But it does not appear to operate like a
list where
On 9/28/2011 7:44 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
...snip...
In particular, should be forcing the questions by proposing a
categorization and seeking lazy consensus? For example, If there are
no objections within 3 days to treating the Boost Licence as Category
A compatible, then we assume lazy consensus
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
AGG stays. It's used here:
canvas/source/tools/canvastools.flt
canvas/source/tools/image.cxx
image.cxx is dead code as well. both can go, with agg.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpRpxR25jtd3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi;
--- On Thu, 10/13/11, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
AGG stays. It's used here:
canvas/source/tools/canvastools.flt
canvas/source/tools/image.cxx
image.cxx is dead code as well. both can go, with agg.
I have a patch that updates agg
There are already comments that require response.
Don H? Shane?
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 14, 2011, at 5:07 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
The press@ team has a new blog entry/announce@ about general issues around
the transition from the previous OpenOffice.org project to the new Apache
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the last 6 months:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300;
It is perfectly understandable why someone would make this mistake.
Can we please do something about the old Mercury servers.
Ross
--
Ross
And while we are at it can we do anything about
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice - why did we create a new OhLoh
project rather than update the old one?
On 14 October 2011 16:26, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm
Hello guys;
I am a committer and I am not afraid to commit patches ;-).
Committing patches from the bugzilla database should
involve being able to close issues, but that is
not in my power. I never had an @openoffice.org account
so that may have some relationship with my current
configuration.
Oh, my what an... extraordinarily colorful and controversial set of
quotes to rip out of the middle of different postings they put together:
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/11/10/14/1531252/OpenOffice-Is-Dying-And-IBM-Wont-Help
And boy, are there some misunderstandings out there.
- Shane
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the last 6 months:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300;
It is perfectly understandable why someone would make this
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
And while we are at it can we do anything about
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice - why did we create a new OhLoh
project rather than update the old one?
As previously discussed, this is work in progress. I've
On 14 October 2011 16:49, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the last 6 months:
On 14 October 2011 16:51, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
And while we are at it can we do anything about
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice - why did we create a new OhLoh
project rather than update the old
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the last 6 months:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300;
It is
--- On Fri, 10/14/11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
...
A branch would save us from having say... 1000 commits
with header changes in the history.
Apache uses version control as the canonical record. It's
therefore essential to know why a header was changed and
by whom.
And of course
Folk here at the LibreOffice conference are asking me why Apache has put out
a release they read as implying criticism of LibreOffice. Can you give me a
response I can give them please? I'll be speaking at the closing session on
Saturday.
Cheers
S.
On Oct 14, 2011 2:07 PM, Shane Curcuru
Dave Fisher wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:56:10 -0700:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the
Folks,
The infrastructure team has noticed that Bugzilla updates from the OOo
instance are not being sent to any ASF mailing lists. AS part of the if
it didn't happen on the mailing list it didn't happen this needs to be
rectified quickly.
The infrastructure team will therefore be adding the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
There are already comments that require response.
Don H? Shane?
Links please. There's alot, so I'm interested to see which ones you feel are
priority.
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 14, 2011, at 5:07 AM, Shane Curcuru
Someone asked this a couple of weeks ago, IIRC the answer was (a) need
to evaluate this, (b) viewvc (which is already installed) has
a search feature, whether it would be sufficient.
Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 18:58:27 -0400:
The legacy OpenOffice.org project had an instance [1] of a
Specific times/locations for individual meetups are scheduled by the
conference organizers, often closer to the actual event itself. It will
be Tues, Wed, or Thu night starting at 8pm, at the main ApacheCon show area.
You can see the planning process for meetups happening here:
Well I'd have to write a book to respond to SO many interesting ideas, so
I guess I'll remain mum. The truth is out there...well several
interpretations of it anyway.
The press release that came out today was very good by the way.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Shane Curcuru
Aaron--
You might want to take a look at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Aaron Steen ams5...@gmail.com wrote:
to register and write documentation.
--
Aaron Steen
Staff Writer, Goblin http://www.goblin.mu
Editor, Arcade
On Oct 14, 2011 6:22 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
If LibreOffice, as an entity, or people behind or involved
with LO are guilty of the above, then of course the PR applies
to them. If innocent, then of course it does not.
I'm not sure that response is going to create much
Well, the demonstration of initial confusion in the Team OpenOffice.org
approach is certainly clear. The teamopenoffice press release is assumed to be
from OpenOffice.org in the Slashdot lede. (To help with that, apparently
Team OO.o holds an OO.o trademark or claimed to at one point.)
I've
Thanks, Shane. I was planning a day trip specifically for the meetup, but I
can't do that for an evening meeting. That is the kind of information I
needed.
Still, the meetup invitation is on the Apache announcement and there is no
information to be found using the link given at the bottom of
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I've read through the German materials at the site and, while Google
Translator does stumble, the gist of it is pretty clear. This has all the
appearance of an over-the-top plea to fund 4 guys to save
Simon,
My unsolicited advice:
There are several topics in the single announcement from ASF. My
recommendation is to read the paragraph that mentions TDF as independent of
the other material. From here, it looked like an olive branch. It's
unfortunate that it looks like a barbed spear to
Here is the team in Team OpenOffice.org:
http://teamopenoffice.org/de/das-team.html
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
-Original Message-
From: Donald Whytock
On Oct 14, 2011 7:07 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
My unsolicited advice:
There are several topics in the single announcement from ASF. My
recommendation is to read the paragraph that mentions TDF as independent
of
the other material. From here, it looked like an
On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011 6:22 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
If LibreOffice, as an entity, or people behind or involved
with LO are guilty of the above, then of course the PR applies
to them. If innocent, then of course it does not.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened
On Oct 14, 2011 7:04 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it even four guys? They list five title-related email addresses
and give the same phone number five times. If I didn't know Team OO
existed before now I'd wonder if someone had just built a site from
random images.
Many of
On 10/14/2011 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the last 6 months:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300;
It is perfectly
On Oct 14, 2011 7:12 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The intent is address anyone and everyone who is creating the FUD.
Was the Team OpenOffice PR the straw the broke the camel's back?
Pretty much, yeah. Are they the only guilty party? Hardly.
Are we pointing fingers at who are?
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011 7:07 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
My unsolicited advice:
There are several topics in the single announcement from ASF. My
recommendation is to read the paragraph that mentions TDF as independent
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011 7:04 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it even four guys? They list five title-related email addresses
and give the same phone number five times. If I didn't know Team OO
existed before now
On 10/14/2011 8:58 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- On Fri, 10/14/11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
...
A branch would save us from having say... 1000 commits
with header changes in the history.
Apache uses version control as the canonical record. It's
therefore essential to know why a header was
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011 7:12 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The intent is address anyone and everyone who is creating the FUD.
Was the Team OpenOffice PR the straw the broke the camel's back?
Pretty much, yeah. Are they the only guilty
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I've read through the German materials at the site and, while Google
Translator does stumble, the gist of it is pretty clear. This has
My only wish is that we had someone at the conference who
was supportive of the ASF and the AOOo podling in this
matter who was able to explain this in a positive light…
I've encouraged Charles Schulz of the TDF to reach out to
me, directly, should that not be clear and to emphasize
both the ASF's
Hi Dennis,
I plan to arrive @ApacheCon on Monday. On Tuesday I am planning to sit in the
conference area and hack on the openoffice.org website and other issues.
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Thanks, Shane. I was planning a day trip specifically for
Hi Mark,
Thanks. I believe that the podling PPMC needs to make sure there are people who
are able to be sysadmins.
Is it possible for you to identify who currently has a sysadmin role in the
AOOo BZ. Send it to ooo-private if you prefer.
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Mark Thomas
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
If possible I would like to volunteer as bugzilla sysadmin, e.g., to
upgrade user accounts with more permission, like it's the currenty case
with Pedro.
Marcus
Am 10/14/2011 07:34 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi Mark,
Thanks. I believe that the podling PPMC needs to make sure there are people
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Dennis,
I plan to arrive @ApacheCon on Monday. On Tuesday I am planning to sit in
the conference area and hack on the openoffice.org website and other
issues.
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Dennis
On Oct 14, 2011 7:28 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
My only wish is that we had someone at the conference who
was supportive of the ASF and the AOOo podling in this
matter who was able to explain this in a positive light…
Well, Doug Heintzman and I are sitting together here and
On Oct 14, 2011 7:26 PM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:
It probably isn't a coincidence that LibreOffice Con is this weekend and
we're the
real deal messaging is coming from LO and TOOo is concerned about
dilution
of the OOo brand...
We've not seen any messaging like that here in
On Oct 14, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011 7:28 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
My only wish is that we had someone at the conference who
was supportive of the ASF and the AOOo podling in this
matter who was able to explain this in a positive light…
I can't speak for Jim, but I can say that the spirit of best wishes to
the TDF and LibreOffice is honest and sincere from my point of view.
I also believe it's sincere from the point of view of the Apache
OpenOffice podling - there have been multiple offers to try to work
together and
Sorry to interject as Jim's on this, but I wanted to address one thing:
The question that Simon is asking is simple. Some have read the best wishes
to TDF and LibreOffice as being sarcastic and mean spirited. I certainly
didn't read it that way. The issue seems to be that the paragraph
While discussing this month's PPMC Board Report we discussed making volunteers
from the PPMC responsible for certain roles. We quickly proceeded with a Press
Liaison due to the immediate need. Before settling on a larger set of roles
let's have a discussion and come to a consensus.
Types of
Hi;
When I saw this thread about machine-generate files, I never
imagined we would be taking about code in OpenOffice.org but
I found that this file:
icc/source/create_sRGB_profile/create_sRGB_profile.cpp
indeed generates viral licensed code!
I am proposing an obvious patch but I wanted the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
snip
The question that Simon is asking is simple. Some have read the best
wishes to TDF and LibreOffice as being sarcastic and mean spirited. I
certainly didn't read it that way. The issue seems to be that the paragraph
Hi all,
I have download the source via 'svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/trunk'
But now I don't know how to start. There is neither a 'configure' nor a
'autogen.sh'.
I had build OOo-DEV300m106. I'm working with MSVC 2008 Express on WinXP.
Kind regards
Regina
Hi;
That has changed for everyone.. and has to be updated in
the guides.
You need GNU autoconf : it generates the configure
script.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Fri, 10/14/11, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
I know that guide, but 'configure' mentioned there, does
not exist.
$
On 14/10/2011 18:34, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks. I believe that the podling PPMC needs to make sure there are people
who are able to be sysadmins.
Agreed. A quick glance at the lists below suggests that quite a few
additional admins are required.
Option 1:
Identify a few folks to
I think this is a wonderful idea and I would like to add an additional
item -- can we get a list of folks who have submitted iCLAs toward this
project, assuming they've filled in the notify project item?
Another great mystery that might be nice to have unveiled.
and yep, I tried to get a list
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is a wonderful idea and I would like to add an additional item
-- can we get a list of folks who have submitted iCLAs toward this project,
assuming they've filled in the notify project item?
Another great
Hello Regina,
nice to see you here :)
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:56:09PM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I have download the source via 'svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/trunk'
working with svn is a pain once you are used to Mercurial or Git.
Besides, it takes a
I've been pondering what it takes to choreograph migration of the live
OpenOffice.org properties into Apache custodianship.
Instead of shoe-horning something on the Community Wiki, I want to rehearse
some ideas here:
1. Basic Idea of OpenOffice.org Properties
2. Stages of Property
It has since been confirmed that there are still 55 members on the PPMC.
I mistook a change in preferred e-mail to be an exit from the PPMC.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:11
To:
And I'm on El Reg!
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/14/apache_openoffice_alive_well/
Hope I did OK in the interview. At least I got a good closing quote,
even if it was a little tweaked in the story.
- Shane
On 10/14/2011 11:45 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Oh, my what an...
It's now been 4 months. I'd suggest that it's time to remove initial
committer names of those folks who have never really participated in the
project, and/or who haven't signed an iCLA.
They're always welcome to show up later, show merit like everyone else
who has been working hard on the
No problem. It was expect to happen by now. I've been lazy about it while
tending to other things.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Shane Curcuru [mailto:a...@shanecurcuru.org]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 17:24
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2011-10-12 PPMC Status:
73 matches
Mail list logo
