AW: apache-suphp updated on solaris 10 (Sparc)

I checked suPHP 0.7.0: the Autoconf options which we used under apache-suphp::with_suphp_ugid_check=no for 0.6.0 are still documented in the doc/INSTALL but are not longer implemented. And even the code seems to be no longer have any conditionals for ignoring those lookup failures. I guess

AW: apache-suphp updated on solaris 10 (Sparc)

Christoph Schug wrote: Birger Krägelin wrote: I just did an update of my apache installation. Now apache-suphp gives an error. old version was apache-suphp-0.6.2-20080101.sparc64-solaris10 current version is apache-suphp-0.7.0-20081225.sparc64-solaris10 I didn't change my

apache-suphp updated on solaris 10 (Sparc)

I just did an update of my apache installation. Now apache-suphp gives an error. old version was apache-suphp-0.6.2-20080101.sparc64-solaris10 current version is apache-suphp-0.7.0-20081225.sparc64-solaris10 I didn't change my configuration, and I didn't change my build script. I have

AW: spamassassin and fsl not working

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008, Birger Krägelin wrote: On changing the default fsl configuration of spamassassin we found that spamassassin doesn't work with fsl. The default logfile was hardcoded in rc.spamassassin. After removing the startup option spamassassin logs to syslog. Platform

Proplems with rc --- how to debug?

I have problems with rc %daily. Sometimes the scripts don't run, sometimes servers terminate properly for logfile rotating, but they do not restart. Affected are mysql and openldap right now. Mysql does not rotate the logfiles. Openldap sometimes restarts, sometimes not. I use unmodified rc

How to build a quick and dirty binary RPM?

the syslog. Thanks for your help Birger - Dipl.-Inform. Birger Krägelin Abteilungsleiter Netzwerke Fraunhofer Institut für Informations- und Datenverarbeitung IITB Fraunhoferstr. 1 76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-6091-454 Fax.: +49-721-6091-570 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

AW: sendmail and SMTP AUTH

I'm not using Sendmail myself, but I've setup a TLS and SMTP-AUTH driven SASL-enabled Postfix and its config file is expected under prefix/etc/sasl/postfix.conf, so I would guess your file path has to be /opt/local/etc/sasl/sendmail.conf (assuming that /opt/local is your OpenPKG instance

Imageagick and Solaris 10 Sparc

I get the following error when compiling Imagemagick on a Sparc machine running Solaris 10 udate 4 (08/2007) /bin/sh ./libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile /opt/local/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./config -I./ltdl -I./ltdl -I/opt/local/include -I/opt/local/include -I/opt/local/include

Apache suphp and Solaris 10 Sparc

When compiling apache-suphp on Solaris 10 I get the following error: make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. ../../config/install-sh -c -d /opt/local/RPM/TMP/apache-suphp-0.6.2-root'/opt/local/libexec/apache' /bin/ksh: ../../config/install-sh: cannot execute make[3]: ***

OpenLDAP unter Solaris10 Sparc

Hello together, we have problems compiling openldap under Solaris 10 8/07 Sparc. /bin/sh ../../..//libtool --tag=disable-shared --mode=compile /opt/local/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -I/opt/local/include/pth -D_AVL_H -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I/opt/local/include

AW: OpenLDAP unter Solaris10 Sparc

You are building with pth instead of libpthread, OpenLDAP calls epoll which is not understood by pth. Many Thanks, ... just works :) Birger -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], Network Operations Center, Karlsruhe __ OpenPKG

AW: Bootstrapping on Solaris

@openpkg.org Betreff: Re: Bootstrapping on Solaris On Fri, Dec 07, 2007, Birger Krägelin wrote: for PKG in fsl make binutils gcc perl do /opt/local/bin/openpkg build -D use_cc=/openpkg/bin/gcc \ -D use_make=/openpkg/bin

AW: Bootstrapping on Solaris

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ralf S. Engelschall Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 20:04 An: openpkg-users@openpkg.org Betreff: Re: Bootstrapping on Solaris On Fri, Dec 07, 2007, Birger Krägelin wrote

Bootstrapping on Solaris

Hi everyone, when trying to bootstrap on Solaris, I always get an error on a missing make. My setup is as follows: Solaris 10 on Sparc, reduced setup, hardened OS. 1st step Install /openpkg environment (binary from depotserver) openpkg.sh fsl.rpm make.rpm

Bootstrapping on Solaris

Hi, there have been some emails about bootstrapping openpkg on Solaris. Especially there are somtimes problems with missing compilers for the first stage. In my environment, I set up machines with a minimal Solaris 10, i.e. Solaris Reduced Network Cluster (less than Solaris Core from older

suPHP on apache, howto?

Hi, does anybody use suPHP on apache? I want to secure my server, which currently hosts about 600 users. When I build apache with mod_suphp, everything goes well. In apache.base there is a minimal configuration for suphp but I cannot find an example for openpkg-setup. I read the docs for

OpenPKG on SPARC???

further support SPARC platform? Birger - Dipl.-Inform. Birger Krägelin Director Networking Fraunhofer Institute for Information and Dataprocessing IITB Fraunhoferstr. 1 D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-6091-454 Fax.: +49-721-6091-570 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 2.0: apache needs flex?

Hmmm... this is from mod_ssl and should not occur because there is a pre-generated ssl_expr_scan.c in the distribution. Is this on a NFS drive where perhaps time differences exist between client and server? No. I use my armored, minimized Solaris environment, local disk only. I always try to

Preparing for 2.0

What about openpkg build in 2.0? seems to be broken in current 20040218 Birger -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], Network Operations Center, Karlsruhe __ The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org User

Re: Preparing for 2.0

seems to be broken in current 20040218 Yes, it was broken today if you had no perl already installed in the instance, if you mean that. If your problem isn't this, tell me details. I've just two hours before installed as a test OpenPKG 2.0's openpkg and CURRENT's openpkg-tool and it worked

Bind with_dlz_bdb build error on Solaris 9

Just building bind-current: openpkg build -Dbind::with_dlz_bdb bind | sh /tmp/build.out 21 Builds autoconfo.k. Builds bind +++ echo + li= + CC=/opt/local/bin/cc + CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe + LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib + LIBS= + ./configure --prefix=/opt/local --sysconfdir=/opt/local/etc/bind

Re: Bootstrap CURRENT on Solaris9

to quickly fix security problems. Thanks Birger Krägelin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], Network Operations Center, Karlsruhe __ The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org User Communication List

Error on apache-1.3.28-1.3.2 with mod_auth_ldap

Bind_DN cn=Manager,ou=backend2,...,dc=de Bind_Pass pt. don't tell anyone require user admin Is apache known to be broken? Birger Krägelin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], Network Operations Center, Karlsruhe __ The OpenPKG

Wishlist for Release 2.0

For release 2.0 I have two points on my wishlist: - pureftpd has a lot of nice options for external authentication please include at least with_pam with_puredb with_ldap and with_extauth I don't have to manage my own release just to have a with-option - please describe a way, how users

PureFTPD: very old release

On configuring pure-ftpd I missed some features I'm used to. So I checked the versions. OpenPKG uses PureFTPD 1.1.0, which I cannot find anywhere. Latest release is 1.0.17a [24 Nov 2003] What went wrong with porting PureFTPD to OpenPKG? Was it a release mismatch at the pureftpd site? Birger

Re: Build ERROR for sasl

I got the same error building sasl yesterday. The error occurred on my target machine running Solaris 9 in a stripped down, hardened environment. I retried the build on my development machine and it went without any errors. There I have Solaris 9 in a development configuration. It seems, that

Re: Solaris 9 minimal environment

- Original Message - From: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:09 AM Subject: Re: Solaris 9 minimal environment I'm confident that you are administering your system perfectly well, but I would like to warn you about

Re: Solaris 9 minimal environment

Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote: I try to install an armored, minimal Solaris 9 environment with OpenPKG (built for /opt/local). If you are talking about a new Solaris installation with only 'core' or 'end user' solaris packages, then please publish your results. Most people don't like