mm14424 at opensolaris:~$ pfexec reboot -f dryrun
reboot: not all drivers have implemented quiesce(9E)
mm14424 at opensolaris:~$
It would be more customer/system admin friendly to state something
like Fast reboot not supported on this machine rather
than above message which assumes some
with the command
#nroff -man cheetah.3.sunman | more
Thanks Regards,
Gayatri
On 12/08/09 03:09, Margot Miller wrote:
Gayatri,
Do you have a copy of the man page we could look at?
Thanks
Margot
On 12/07/09 07:59, Michael Kearney wrote:
I am sponsering this case for Gayatri
Gayatri,
Do you have a copy of the man page we could look at?
Thanks
Margot
On 12/07/09 07:59, Michael Kearney wrote:
I am sponsering this case for Gayatri. It is a Linux Familiarity project.
Best Regards,
Michael
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
I thought it was strange that ConsoleKit would have reboot given
that HAL service already has reboot, halt, and suspend.
Thanks
Margot
Jedy Wang wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 10:37 +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Wrt ConsoleKit: I share the concerns that it isn't entirely clear which
Brian,
Do you guys have the contract for HAL interfaces? I didn't
see it in case directory. Do you need a contract for volatile
Dbus interfaces?
A nit- man pages should be listed outside the i/f tables.
Thanks
Margot
Brian Cameron wrote:
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
+1
Thanks
Margot
John Fischer wrote:
All,
With all the issues having been answered I am still waiting a +1.
Thanks,
John
abhijit wrote:
Brian,
John is perfectly correct. We really don't have any problem if
GStreamer use gnome private libraries.
At this moment, it is difficult to
Hi All,
We need case owners and interns for the below cases.
2009/264 xVM Ops Center 2.5
2009/209 Realms
2009/198 Dominions
2009/279 Storage Support for Realms and Dominions
2009/231 Project Zagag - Windows Software Update
I can be the case owner for 2009/209 Realms.
Thanks
Margot
wrote:
Margot,
Please put me down with the Minority group.
Thanks,
John
Tom Childers wrote:
Agreed. I vote to approve with the TCR, and would support a TCA to
document the interface classification in the native documentation.
-tdc
On May 20, 2009, at 3:53 PM, Margot Miller wrote:
I
Hey All,
Below is the updated opinion with feedback from James, Mark, and
Mike.
We only had three members vote on this during the meeting. There
was an issue of quorum; we did not have quorum as one member
was not formally declared on sabbatical.
So I would like to conduct an email vote on
resending it- got psarc address wrong.
Hey All,
Below is the updated opinion with feedback from James, Mark, and
Mike.
We only had three members vote on this during the meeting. There
was an issue of quorum; we did not have quorum as one member
was not formally declared on sabbatical.
So I
Good point.
Will omit that second line.
Thanks
Margot
James Carlson wrote:
[I know you're looking for a vote here and not more discussion, but I
don't think the text matches up yet.]
Margot Miller writes:
There is quite a bit of FOSS out there with no interface stability
Mark,
In this below scenario 2b, does it mean that if a project team
is not willing to change the native docs, then they must supply
a man page?
2) OSS Community does not document interface classification in
their native documentation
a) OpenSolaris project team is
All,
I have included the minority opinion written by Mark Carlson.
We did in fact have quorum yesterday; our external member
was not listed as a full member.
In any case, due to the lack of perceived quorum yesterday,
please vote on this case.
Vote to approve the case as written (with the
wrote:
Deny - I'd change it to a TCA to document the interface classification
in the native documentation (follow the outline in the minority opinion).
-- mark
Margot Miller wrote:
All,
I have included the minority opinion written by Mark Carlson.
We did in fact have quorum yesterday; our
on the entire case.
Thanks,
Margot
Margot Miller wrote:
The case hasn't been denied; it's been derailed so an opinion can be
written and it will be clear if precedence has been set or not with
this case.
From the LSARC meeting today, it seemed like the majority of
the committee thought
Vivek,
Minor issue.
Could you please change Package Name to Python module:
pywbem moduleUncommitted Package Name
Could you please send out the pkgmap of this so I can see where everything
is installing?
Thanks
Margot
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
Thank you
Please put the JDK in the imported table. Also previous email
asked what is the minimum JDK that can be used with this.
No need to deliver a man page for a java library.
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Vivek Titarmare. It requests minor
binding
Also what is the name of package this is being delivered in?
Margot Miller wrote:
Please put the JDK in the imported table. Also previous email
asked what is the minimum JDK that can be used with this.
No need to deliver a man page for a java library.
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote
Charles,
Please specify the install directory for the jar files, as well as
the commitment level.
Are there any java docs delivered with this project; didn't see
any in the case directory.
What API's are in this:
drools-ant-4.7.jar jar file
Dependency on SUNWant?
The below conflicts:
/239/mail
Thanks
Margot
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
Resending to add to the logs.
Thanks,
~Vivek R. Titarmare
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Titarmare [mailto:Vivek.Titarmare at Sun.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:24 AM
To: 'Margot Miller'
Cc: 'Mark A. Carlson'; 'Tom Childers
Hey Vivek,
Looking at some of the documentation, it looks like
you import pywbem when running python.
http://pywbem.sourceforge.net/docs/tutorial.shtml:
To test that PyWBEM is sucessfully installed, start up a Python
interpreter and try to import the pywbem module.
$ python
Python
Just to ensure we are all on the same page, below is the latest
interface table.
Are these header files only needed for the build? If so, then
not needed to be in a package installed on customer's system.
Per James Carlson's email:
As long as they're just internal build artifacts, not
Vivek,
Please add the package SUNWpdsh to the interface table.
In the pdsh man page, it has:
qsh Allows pdsh to execute MPI jobs over QsNet. Qshell
propagates the current working directory, pdsh
environment, and Elan capabilities to the remote
+1
Margot
John Fischer wrote:
All,
Attached is the updated man page for this case.
I have put this in the case directory as well.
Thanks,
John
John Fischer wrote:
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1.
So it looks like there is no dependency on JDK 1.5/
That's fine.
This is a later version of what is provided in JDK 1.6.
I have no idea of when the next JDK will be delivered or
if they do sporadic updates. Is that team aware that Sun
projects are requiring a later version of JAXB than they
only need it if you have JDK 1.5
--- mark
Margot Miller wrote:
Does this really depend upon JDK 1.5 or just the latest JDK
on the system?
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Bharath Kumar, requesting
minor binding and timing out 04
This has the same issue with needing a particular version of the JDK-
JDK 1.5
that JAXB LSARC/2009/237 had.
Does JDK 1.6 already include SAAJ?
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Muktha Narayan, requesting minor
binding and timing out 04/20/2009.
that the customer would:
a) be forced to upgrade their Java version, and
b) break Java apps because of such an upgrade
are greatly minimized.
In addition, nobody should be forced to carry around their own JVM to
install in
any case.
-- mark
Margot Miller wrote:
Mark,
Does this mean
According to the interface table, it looks like there is one
binary- pdsh, which will be /usr/local/pdsh.
The materials directory shows man pages for the following:
dshbak
pdcp
rpdcp
pdsh
Are the three top ones also being delivered by this project?
In the pdsh man page, there are a
Henry, Irene, Lin,
Have all open issues on this case now been resolved?
If so, please close this.
Thanks
Margot
Lin Ma wrote:
The case shouldn't be closed until this issue is addressed.
The project team will use
140 0x1005ff76 (SunPowerSwitch) 0x1005ff7d
Does this really depend upon JDK 1.5 or just the latest JDK
on the system?
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Bharath Kumar, requesting minor
binding and timing out 04/20/2009.
-- mark
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This
Hi Irene,
We discussed this case at LSARC this week with Henry and
agreed that if the contract was done and the update to
i/f table per Alan was done, then this case could be
closed.
Thanks
Margot
Irene Huang wrote:
Hi, all
The final proposal is available at
+1
Just curious- the man page mentions tools and libraries for XML-RPC.
Will there be a tools case for this?
Thanks
Margot
James Walker wrote:
I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Angela Li. The requested
release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the
materials
Hey Brian,
Can you update the proposal in the ARC directory, specifically the interface
table, with James Carlson's feedback:
The /usr/share/sounds/sf2 directory is an exported interface for this
project. It's unclear what the stability is intended to be. (Perhaps
'Uncommitted' for the
+1
My only concern would be the migration/upgrade of
customer data, but that looks like it is being addressed.
Thanks
Margot
John Fischer wrote:
All,
I still have an empty mail log for the EOL of BDB 4.2 thus
need a +1.
We (LSARC) approved BDB 4.7 in (2008/570). That case included
a
Resending to lsarc-ext.
Margot Miller wrote:
Minor issues:
Uncommitted is more consistent with other ARC cases for package name
SUNWopengrokCommittedPackage name
Attributes section needed in man page.
And, could you elaborate more on this from the checklist
Brian,
Please don't close this yet until we get a +1 from someone.
I am reviewing it now.
Thanks
Margot
Brian Utterback wrote:
The timer has expired and I didn't hear any objections, so I am
marking this as closed, approved.
Brian Utterback wrote:
Okay, any other comments? The timer has
?
[ ] Yes
[X] No - ARC review required
Thanks
Margot
Margot Miller wrote:
Brian,
Please don't close this yet until we get a +1 from someone.
I am reviewing it now.
Thanks
Margot
Brian Utterback wrote:
The timer has expired and I didn't hear any objections, so I am
marking
Thanks Lubos. I am fine with the networking answer.
The only other thing is to put an attributes section in the
man page.
I have no other issues.
+1 from me.
Margot
On 03/23/09 11:45, Lubos Kosco wrote:
Margot Miller wrote:
Minor issues:
Uncommitted is more consistent with other ARC
+1
Rick Matthews wrote:
Per last weeks meeting, I have modified the case materials as follows:
-) Added the package name to the exported interfaces.
-) Added the jar file to the exported interfaces.
-) Deleted the interface table from the FOSS checklist, and
referred to the
+1
Jyri Virkki wrote:
I am sponsoring this case for Rahul Nair. It updates Squid to the
latest. Timeout set to 03/01/2009.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
I assume there is no dependency on a particular version
of the JDK?
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Vivek Titarmare. It requests minor
binding and times out 03/03/2009. This Fast Track represents a component of
LSARC 2008/748 - Drools.
The FOSS
+1
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Vivek Titarmare. It requests minor
binding and times out 03/03/2009. This Fast Track represents a component of
LSARC 2008/748 - Drools.
The FOSS checklist, man page and javadoc (zip file) are in the case directory
and also
The UNIQUE_BACKEND environment variable should be
added to exported interface table.
Please add the man page to the materials. And I assume
that the UNIQUE_BACKEND is documented in the man page?
Thanks
Margot
Shi-Ying Irene Huang wrote:
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
Looks good. +1
Thanks
Margot
Halton Huo wrote:
Margot,
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:30 -0800, Margot Miller wrote:
The UNIQUE_BACKEND environment variable should be
added to exported interface table.
Added in exported interface table.
Exported Interfaces
Hey,
It looks like there are new interfaces according to the
technical description, which are just new interfaces
to libgnutls.so.26 and libgnutlsxx.so.26. If that is
the case and the man pages reflect that, then +1.
Thanks
Margot
John Fischer wrote:
All,
Please note that this project also
+1
For completeness, the original ANT case was PSARC/2002/232
in the below imported interface table under comments.
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Vivek Titarmare. It requests minor
binding and times out 03/03/2009. This Fast Track represents a
.
Thanks,
~Vivek R. T.
-Original Message-
From: Margot Miller [mailto:Margot.Miller at Sun.COM]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:41 PM
To: Richard Jr Matthews
Cc: LSARC-ext at sun.com; Drools_team at sun.com
Subject: Re: JDOM [LSARC/2009/127 FastTrack timeout 03/03/2009]
What
What is the name of the jar file? Is this jar file in its own
SVR4 package? And, java docs are delivered with this?
Thanks
Margot
Richard Jr Matthews wrote:
I am sponsoring this fast-track for Vivek Titarmare. The
timeout is set at March 3. The case directory contains the supplied
+1
A few minor things: please move man page out of the interface table.
Also, I didn't see the man page in the case materials. Could the
team please put it there? Also, I would imagine that the
man page would state the security risk of WPAD?
Thanks
Margot
John Fischer wrote:
all,
The
Please just put the SVR4 package in the exported interface table.
THanks
Margot
Mark A. Carlson wrote:
This case, having resolved all outstanding issues, is being marked
closed approved.
-- mark
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Vivek Titarmare. It requests
]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 2:18 AM
To: Drools_Team at sun.com
Cc: LSARC-ext at sun.com
Subject: Re: jettison [LSARC/2009/094 FastTrack timeout 02/18/2009]
Vivek,
There is also the question about which jar file these
new interfaces are being included in.
Thanks,
John
Margot Miller
Is this being delivered in its own package, and if so, can you
put it in the interface table?
Thanks
Margot
Mark Carlson wrote:
I am sponsoring this familiarity case for Vivek Titarmare. It requests minor
binding and times out 02/18/2009. This Fast Track represents a component of
LSARC
We (PSARC/2007/078) have talked to this team about the hostid
scheme and the angst it caused with those in MDE. My understanding
is that this current team has talked to MDE to figure out the
impact of this project on their ISV's.
Margot
Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote:
Just to make sure this
This is a fast track submitted for Joe Townsend. Time out is
9/29/08. Patch release binding requested. There is a man
page in case directory.
Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
Anjuta 2.5 Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
or company or ARC bashing
Margot
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
John Plocher wrote:
300+ messages from 24 different people in the mail log for a
fasttrack???
76 From: Joerg Schilling
51 From: Garrett D'Amore
34 From: Margot Miller
30 From: Joseph Kowalski
16 From
Joe,
Did you see my email of last night?
This case is not doing SMF; this is an open source project with
well known configuration interfaces.
From margot.miller Wed Mar 12 11:43:33 2008
In trying to keep to a minimal amount of change from the source, we would
like to not have to
Let's take the comment off the table as I don't know what it means
either.
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
I still don't understand the out of control comment. Just what is
out of control?
- jek3
What I have gleaned from conversations with Liane and others
is that non service configuration data can go into SMF repository.
This was news to me as I always thought it was just services
and their data.
When dealing with open source software, if the administration and
syntax of that open source
I would imagine it is administered just like tar and its config
file /etc/default/tar. I don't understand the later part of your
sentence.
Margot
Gary Winiger wrote:
For star - the archiver - I think SMF is not appropriate anyway. (Given
that star doesn't run as a service, but is just a
We couldn't use the original case because the approved pathnames
of that case are no longer applicable, Plus the interface table
didn't seem fully complete in the first case.
We aren't introducing anything that wasn't in
the original case; actually we are trying to limit
the original case's
I am not sure if it really doesn't do anything.
From the original case PSARC/2004/480:
The other customer-visible difference would be that it comes with a
configuration file (/etc/default/rmt) that allows restricting
individual users
of rmt to specific devices and/or hosts.
From
As I mentioned before, we could not ship the config file and/or disable
the feature.
In any case, the project team withdraws this fast track.
Margot
Gary Winiger wrote:
What I have gleaned from conversations with Liane and others
is that non service configuration data can go into SMF
to somewhere else, how will
users easily find it? Off the top of my head, we could
document in the man pages this conflict.
Looks like this was debated before with no resolution:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=112940#112940
Margot
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Margot Miller
matter. If it is then its access control decisions should be audited.
*
From scott.rotondo at sun.com Mon Mar 17 20:33:32 2008
...
Margot Miller wrote:
If rmt is not setuid, nor does it re-exec via pfexec, would the auditing
of rmt
still be required?
The goal is not to diverge much from
Gary,
I just noticed your email subject line has the old expiration date
so maybe you did not see the new spec that was sent out last week.
Here is the updated spec that was sent out last week (changes included
adding the environment variables used, Garrett's suggestion to
make the command links
pfexec(1)]. If it isn't then I suspect this doesn't
matter. If it is then its access control decisions should be audited.
*
From scott.rotondo Mon Mar 17 20:33:32 2008
...
Margot Miller wrote:
If rmt is not setuid, nor does it re-exec via pfexec, would the auditing
of rmt
still
If rmt is not setuid, nor does it re-exec via pfexec, would the auditing
of rmt
still be required?
The goal is not to diverge much from Joerg's source base.
The project team has agreed that if this is a requirement, then we have
a few options:
1) We could just not ship /etc/default/rmt.
Nico, we will provide the info that you requested.
Margot
Nicolas Williams wrote:
Also, I did search the archive of this case (not exhaustively though --
it's 240+ e-mails already!) for the answer. And whether rmt is setuid
or executed via pfexec is a very important architectural issue that
Scott,
Thanks for your input.
Comments embedded below.
Margot
Scott Rotondo wrote:
Margot Miller wrote:
If rmt is not setuid, nor does it re-exec via pfexec, would the
auditing of rmt
still be required? The goal is not to diverge much from Joerg's
source base.
Ken said in another
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
- What happens if the system crashes during an incremental
star? Are these files automatically cleaned up on reboot?
ufsrestore exists since 27 years. I am not aware that somebody
asked for a similar feature for the case that the kernel crashes
during a
The project team and Joerg are in agreement that it is going through
the SFW consoldation. The plan is to deviate as little as possible
from the upstream community.
The outstanding issue is the rmt and auditing. Once we have reviewed
that issue we will have a proposal for how to comply. If
Margot Miller wrote:
Below is the revised spec for star and rmt integration. The timer has
been
reset to MARCH 20th. Seeking minor binding.
Have tried to summarize the issues. If I have left your issue off the
list,
please respond to this email with it.
Closed issues
Do any PSARC members and/or Liane object to granting a waiver for
this project for SMF given the configuration files in this project are well
known system administrator interfaces?
Thanks,
Margot
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
I'd personally see it that the policy wasn't
Thanks Joerg for providing the below star/tar differences.
Richard,
Do you need anymore info on these differences? And is
it a requirement to have a section in the star man page
that summarizes the below differences?
Thanks
Margot
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Rick Matthews Richard.Matthews at
is unlimited.
The fourth entry is optional. If it contains a 'n'
or a 'N', then the archive device is not a tape.
...
Margot
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Margot Miller wrote:
Will add /etc/default/star to the interface table.
Margot
Similarly
Below is the revised spec for star and rmt integration. The timer has been
reset to MARCH 20th. Seeking minor binding.
Have tried to summarize the issues. If I have left your issue off the list,
please respond to this email with it.
Closed issues:
- Will not provide /usr/include/schilly
Rereading the original case PSARC/2004/480, this issue came up before.
It should probably have never been in /usr/sbin anyway, but
rather somewhere in /usr/lib. I believe it is always invoked
as /etc/rmt, which could presumably point somewhere else if the
need arose and it was thought
Will add /etc/default/star to the interface table.
Margot
Similarly the star(1) man page in the materials directory
appears to have an /etc/default/star file specified.
I guess that isn't delivered as it's not listed in the
interfaces.
star's
When integrating a project through SFW consolidation, is it requirement
that it be modified to fit into SMF?
Thanks,
Margot
Gary Winiger wrote:
Gary Winiger gww at eng.sun.com wrote:
Current changes:
- /usr/sbin/rmt executable from ON replaced by the rmt from star
- close to 20. They have also been around awhile
too; /etc/default/rmt - 1998 and /etc/default/star - 2000.
Thanks,
Margot
James Carlson wrote:
Margot Miller writes:
When integrating a project through SFW consolidation, is it requirement
that it be modified to fit into SMF?
SMF
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Let's cut this off...
Garrett said that if the headers and manpage for the PRIVATE
implementation were not removed,
he would derail this case. I saw some OK, if I need to do multiple
cases, I will. Please, alter the
case and repost it (Ken? Margot?).
Okay.
Below is the updated spec.
Thanks,
Margot
*
Date:
Mar 11, 2008
Author:
Ken Erickson (kene at eng)
Proposal:
Integrate schily tar (star), a tar-like clone with more
features and rmt.
Details:
Hey Gary,
I don't know if star does or does not support Trusted Solaris
extensions- I didn't see it in the star man page. Joerg, could
you please answer that?
If it doesn't support it, I assume this is not a requirement for
integration?And if not a requirement for integration would
this be
That is what Ken would like to do.
Joerg, can you please answer Darren Moffat's question so we can
close on this issue:
Why is it required to ship the header files for librmt as part of
this case anyway ? Does something in
star,rmt,librmt use the header files at run time ?
Thanks
librmt header
files and address all the issues that have arisen here.
Margot
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Margot Miller margot.miller at sun.com wrote:
That is what Ken would like to do.
Joerg, can you please answer Darren Moffat's question so we can
close on this issue:
Why
It looks like none of the OSS CLI will be part of this phase.
How will volume control be done? Does the Solaris audio
CLI and Gnome volume control work with OSS hdaudio driver?
Margot
Frank Che wrote:
I'm sponsoring this fast track for Freeman Liu and the audio team.
The requested binding
Below is an exchange from Steve Uhler, from SubLabs,
and the OSS architect from 4Front. From the inception
review, PSARC asked that Steve's issues be summarized and
sent to PSARC.
Main issues are:
1) SADA leverages streams and as a result, better able
to control latencies. Latency key to
88 matches
Mail list logo
