Geoff Clare wrote:
Hugh McIntyre wrote, on 18 May 2007:
Geoff Clare wrote:
(One important issue with the df -k output for scripting is that
it adds line breaks in the output for long directory names; that
makes parsing a bit harder)
So use df -Pk, which outputs one line per file system.
Are
On 18/05/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to docs or give me advice on live upgrading from s10 to
s11?
I upgraded the lu packages, the zone packages and a couple zfs packages and
still get errors.
It should work if you live upgrade from Solaris 10 Update
Ian Appru wrote:
While atomic increment/decrements (using cas) are suffiently well documented
for me to be pretty
confident in my implementation I would apreciate any input for an atomic
conditional increment.
I'd expect the following to work on OpenSolaris:
#include atomic.h
int
Doug Scott schrieb:
The patch for df.c below checks to see if stdout is a tty (i.e.
interactive), and will add
the -h option if no other options conflict. If stdout is not a tty (i.e.
a script), the df command
is unchanged. Is there anything wrong with this idea??
Why does everyone like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Appru wrote:
While atomic increment/decrements (using cas) are suffiently well documented
for me to be pretty
confident in my implementation I would apreciate any input for an atomic
conditional increment.
I'd expect the following to work on OpenSolaris:
I agree - anything the Chinese community want to do to encourage the development
on OpenSolaris seems like a great thing. Best of luck with it.
Glynn
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
+1
joey wrote:
Hi Folks,
Attached please find the Project proposal for the OpenSolaris
programming contest in
John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Murdock wrote:
And that would break... what, exactly?
We don't know.
We know it has the potential of breaking scripts that,
for better or worse, parse the output of /bin/df.
It can (and has been) argued that those scripts are
already not
John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Description
Indiana is intended to be a product - an OpenSolaris
distribution with a regular release schedule.
Project Team:
Needed...
I am sorry, but the more I read about Indiana, the more I am uncomfortable
a b [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a HP-UX-11.x system?
Yes, I do.
Well, there is AIX but I am not sure whether IBM takes it for real
and I know of no hacker who is using AIX as development platform.
I wanted to get AIX, but when I looked even at an outdated 32-bit
It's too bad that you have issolated China out in
such a programming
context.
He's not. He's bringing thousands of new people /to/ the OpenSolaris Community,
which is very cool. In fact what I like about this model is that it's locally
created and managed, not centrally mandated from
I've probably a bad idea,but for me to make Solaris more linux like is to
have an opensolaris distro with all sources (sources for every package) and a
desktop like Ubuntu or RH.Is this an open community? Is this open source?
Giacomo
___
OpenSolaris - The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
It probably shouldn't be the default, but I can't really tell what this
means:
131996712968156 9652530272 1%
quick, how much space is that?
Enough free.
With the -h option the width of the filesystem size is roughly the same -
regardless if the
I've probably a bad idea,but for me to make Solaris more linux like
is to have an opensolaris distro with all sources (sources for every
package) and a desktop like Ubuntu or RH.Is this an open community? Is
this open source?
I find that a strange way to look at more Linux like.
I would be
FreeBSD's utilities in contrast check for the largest required width and
adjusts output accordingly:
-rwsr-s--x 1 oracle dba 133894000 Mai 29 2006 oracle*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 oracle dba1339524 Mai 19 2006 oratclsh*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 oracle dba 48 Sep 25 2000 oraxml*
I've probably a bad idea,but for me to make Solaris
more linux like is to have an opensolaris distro
with all sources (sources for every package) and a
desktop like Ubuntu or RH.Is this an open community?
Is this open source?
I suppose that's a matter of taste; some would love it,
others
There is a lot of cruft, like HOTLINE, ULIMIT, ORDER,
etc. Why there
is even a MAXINST parameter is a puzzle to me.
One can have multiple instances of a single named package installed;
that happens for example if one is loads Studio 10 and Studio 11
at the same time. For that to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
FreeBSD's utilities in contrast check for the largest required width and
adjusts output accordingly:
-rwsr-s--x 1 oracle dba 133894000 Mai 29 2006 oracle*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 oracle dba1339524 Mai 19 2006 oratclsh*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 oracle dba
Yes it is a matter of taste.Sincerely I have not a preference to use programs
binary only or with all sources,but,which is the most common accepted idea of
opensource? In my opinion is something like program + sources.So the message
for all could be clear: Sun with opensolaris community offer
Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If df had a similar output, I'd prefer this:
83886083041200 534740837%
335544321605719 31794110 5%
62914560 37766679 1412994873%
62914560 11017932 1412994844%
Compared to other marketing activities from Sun,
this would be cheap and the
current idea of project Indiana looks to me like
a Sun OpenSolaris
distribution that (if done the way it currently
seems) will most likely embrace
and crush the sensitive plants that are the real
free grown
Chung Hang Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compared to other marketing activities from Sun,
this would be cheap and the
current idea of project Indiana looks to me like
a Sun OpenSolaris
distribution that (if done the way it currently
seems) will most likely embrace
Chung Hang Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compared to other marketing activities from Sun,
this would be cheap and the
current idea of project Indiana looks to me like
a Sun OpenSolaris
distribution that (if done the way it currently
seems) will most likely embrace
I don't see that it would help to have a second Sun
Solaris distribution.
If Sun likes to put money into OpenSolaris, this
should be done in a way
that enables collaboration and in a way that allows
to contribute code by
non-Sun people.
It doesn't matter if it helps or not, or does it?
--- Chao-Feng Guo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just think it in another way: actually most
habitants in Hong Kong can listen to and understand
the Chinese Mandarin. But in reverse it doesn't
work.
ROTFL. You do not know Hong Kong at all. The newer
generation may be (with the present critically
--- Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chao-Feng Guo wrote:
Just think it in another way: actually most
habitants in Hong Kong can listen to and understand
the Chinese Mandarin. But in reverse it doesn't
work.
Is this assumption true though when comes to
technical terms and
--- Andre van Eyssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Christopher Mahan wrote:
I'm going to throw this out there to see what
sticks:
8) Allow unrestricted code commit by community
members. Nightly
builds should check for broken stuff. Have nn-sun
code
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've probably a bad idea,but for me to make
Solaris more linux like
is to have an opensolaris distro with all sources
(sources for every
package) and a desktop like Ubuntu or RH.Is this an
open community? Is
this open source?
I find that a strange way to
--- Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chung Hang Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Compared to other marketing activities from Sun,
this would be cheap and the
current idea of project Indiana looks to me
like
a Sun OpenSolaris
distribution that (if done
But I'd like to ask: *why* do you - all - maintain different distributions?
It is obvious why I created a distribution:
It was done in order to create a distribution as none did exist before.
Why did other people create _different_ distributions?
Jörg
Well, you answered a
Maybe not the kernel sources if we are not developers.
I would say the chances of interest in other packages
that come along with the distribution are much higher
than 0.1%.
i really really doubt that, the sources are quite useless actually,
what you really use are the derived binaries, check
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD's utilities in contrast check for the largest required width and
adjusts output accordingly:
-rwsr-s--x 1 oracle dba 133894000 Mai 29 2006 oracle*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 oracle dba1339524 Mai 19 2006 oratclsh*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 oracle dba
Hugh McIntyre schrieb:
You can use (n)awk in the case above. For example, what happens with
cut in the case above if a future project allows usernames 8
characters? But granted that some people will have scripts that use
cut, so it's hard to change.
Compatible formatting if stdout is not a
On 18/05/07, Rich Friedeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Steve Stallion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whoa... slow down Tiger.
SVR4 is by far a more complete and cohesive packaging format than is
available on any other UNIX or Linux distribution. Essentially there
is no technical merit in tossing
On 19/05/07, Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh McIntyre schrieb:
You can use (n)awk in the case above. For example, what happens with
cut in the case above if a future project allows usernames 8
characters? But granted that some people will have scripts that use
cut, so it's hard
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/05/07, Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh McIntyre schrieb:
You can use (n)awk in the case above. For example, what happens with
cut in the case above if a future project allows usernames 8
characters? But granted that some people will have scripts that use
Initially Linux was not suitable for Enterprise
deployments, but as
time goes on Linux is acceptable, for more and more
tasks. (Many times
being the best choice).
One picks Linux as the best choice only if one doesn't know what one is
doing. It is as simple as that.
A real system engineer
On 19/05/07, Doug Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/05/07, Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh McIntyre schrieb:
You can use (n)awk in the case above. For example, what happens with
cut in the case above if a future project allows usernames 8
characters?
Shawn Walker schrieb:
On 19/05/07, Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compatible formatting if stdout is not a terminal.
Optimized formatting if stdout is a terminal.
Which would be really annoying to me as a user.
I would go to look at the output, think I'll just pipe that to such
and
On 19/05/07, Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker schrieb:
On 19/05/07, Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compatible formatting if stdout is not a terminal.
Optimized formatting if stdout is a terminal.
Which would be really annoying to me as a user.
I would go to look at
Shawn Walker schrieb:
As I said before, the point is that it is unexpected behaviour.
Do you count the number of columns in an interactive context?
Unless the man page for the utility explicitly lists the behaviour in
question, it is undesireable in my view. Even then, I have misgivings
On 19/05/07, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One picks Linux as the best choice only if one doesn't know what one is
doing. It is as simple as that.
snip a load of bile
This kind of thing is coming across more and more as irrational hatred.
Take it elsewhere, it's not helpful.
--
On 5/19/07, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Initially Linux was not suitable for Enterprise
deployments, but as
time goes on Linux is acceptable, for more and more
tasks. (Many times
being the best choice).
One picks Linux as the best choice only if one doesn't know what one is
doing.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating Signed Packages:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0406/6mg76stf9?q=signa=view
Thanks for that... I hadn't managed to track it down.
- meta-packages: There are a number of ways to provide, for
43 matches
Mail list logo
