On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:42 -0700, Korey Peters wrote:
> >All
> > I want is all the coding geeks running Solaris on
> > their laptops/desktops. (Especially University
> > coding geeks... That is where people generally
> > develop their OS
> > preferences). Remember people deploy what they are
> > f
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:38 -0700, Korey Peters wrote:
> >
> > I think the "40%" was a rectum pluck rather than it
> > being a fixed number
> > on which OpenSolaris should aim. I mean, if you look
> > at Mac, their
> > marketshare is below 10% and yet has a bigger
> > selection of software than
>
> But, of course, that won't happen. If it is perfect,
> everyone will use it. Even if it's just "pretty
> good", people will use it.
It is the availability of software that makes or breaks a platform. Not
hardware, not OS technical superiority, not OS security, not ease of use.
Only software
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 23:36 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone running any GPGPU code on Solaris? I ask
> > because with AMD Fusion coming down the road, it
> > seems that most AMD64 machines will have access to
> > GPU based computation functions.With Solaris
> > and Sun moving to a highl
>
> Is anyone running any GPGPU code on Solaris? I ask
> because with AMD Fusion coming down the road, it
> seems that most AMD64 machines will have access to
> GPU based computation functions.With Solaris
> and Sun moving to a highly threaded programming model
> (Fortress), might these functions
> Best is hard to define, is it the crappy OS that
> every software vendor
> targets their application at, or the perfect OS that
> they ignore?
>
> Success on the desktop is more down to marketing and
> spin than technical
> merit.
>
> It's unfortunate to see the same trend emerging in
> the ser
> I agree that the lack of pretty user interface will
> stop Solaris becoming part of the consumer-user
> space. This again is
> quite correct and apt. OpenSolaris is available to be
> "interesting" to developers; including GUI
> developers. Prettied-up
> OpenSolaris distros will become available
>All
> I want is all the coding geeks running Solaris on
> their laptops/desktops. (Especially University
> coding geeks... That is where people generally
> develop their OS
> preferences). Remember people deploy what they are
> familiar with. Also, they tend to deploy to the OS
> they develop with
>
> I think the "40%" was a rectum pluck rather than it
> being a fixed number
> on which OpenSolaris should aim. I mean, if you look
> at Mac, their
> marketshare is below 10% and yet has a bigger
> selection of software than
> Solaris.
>
> One could argue that not only does Solaris need more
>
> I enjoy Solaris, Always have. Do I want it to become
> another Windows? NO.
> Leave the point and clickers behind. We in the Open
> source community need to be able to
> give all people the choice and flexibility to be
> independent. To have the freedom to develop
> the next evolutionary step
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 20:29 -0700, John Martinez wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:46 -0700, John Martinez wrote:
> >>
> >> I think a lot of people keep missing the point that Solaris' bread
> >> and butter is the enterprise server market.
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 23:43 -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> One could argue that not only does Solaris need more users,
> but its
> quality rather than quantity. If the vast majority of the 40%
> are penny
> pinching, proprietary software hating, thick-rim-glass
>
> One could argue that not only does Solaris need more users, but its
> quality rather than quantity. If the vast majority of the 40% are penny
> pinching, proprietary software hating, thick-rim-glasses wearing, hunch
> back coding geeks - it certainly won't attract vendors such as Adobe or
> MYO
On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:46 -0700, John Martinez wrote:
>>
>> I think a lot of people keep missing the point that Solaris' bread
>> and butter is the enterprise server market. I don't know what the
>> ratio of server to desktop installations i
Note that "No developer is required to provide these exceptions in a derived
work".
So as copyright holder Apple is reserving compliance with GPL when applied to
their own operating system's but this exception does not have to be extended
when a develepor distributes his/her derived work. So ba
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:46 -0700, John Martinez wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:49 PM, andrewk9 wrote:
>
> > I agree entirely with this post. My thoughts:
> >
> > 1. We in the community should not be expecting Sun to be
> addressing
> > all of the shortcomings in OpenSolaris. The community need
> - Finish the port from Xsun to Xorg Xserver, including on Sparc.
> - Virtual Terminals support which is in the works
> - Complete the SunAudio to OSS migration.
> - Make further progress with Project Indiana (e.g. provide the sorts
>of tools that Linux users expect like autoconf, automake, li
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:49 -0700, andrewk9 wrote:
> I agree entirely with this post. My thoughts:
>
> 1. We in the community should not be expecting Sun to be addressing
> all of the shortcomings in OpenSolaris. The community needs to be
> involved in a meaningful way in improving it. A first ste
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:40 -0700, Edward McAuley wrote:
> Thank you Alan.
>
> I am somewhat confused regarding their approach. They are saying the
> are going to deliver these drivers, on one hand, but on the other hand
> they are claiming they cannot because they don't own all of the IP
> (that
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:11 -0700, Edward McAuley wrote:
> Uh, let's see. Beautiful interface (as attractive as the Mac or Vista),
> intuitively laid out, ease of use, UNIX (like), open source...it's already
> here. You can download it or buy it.
>
> Suse 10.2
>
> Please look at this latest v
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:52 -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote:
> > To Ian Murdoch and the Open Solaris Community,
> >
> > As a long-time follower of the open source community,
> > I stumbled across this forum a week ago and was
> > intrigued by the activity taking place on Open
> > Solaris. I spent some
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:29 -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> > Solaris is uniquely situated to make this dream a reality.
> > With the support of Sun Microsystems, resources
>
> Solaris is not very well positioned in the UI competition. Sun, it
> appears, has consciously chosen not to actively
On 7/31/07, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Walker wrote:
> > There is no reason why a good OS can't be used everywhere. I
> > use Solaris on my desktop everyday. I think 40% is too small. We
> > should shoot for 100% of the desktop market.
>
>
> Now there's some thinking I can get b
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 09:32 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Edward McAuley wrote:
> > Is anyone aware of a source who has drivers for the ATI X1900 that
> will work on Solaris 10?
>
> The only possible source I know of is the currently
> very-much-experimental
> and under heavy development xf86-v
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:22 -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> Is anyone running any GPGPU code on Solaris? I ask because with AMD
> Fusion coming down the road, it seems that most AMD64 machines will
> have access to GPU based computation functions.
>
> With Solaris and Sun moving to a highly threaded p
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 00:29 -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> They have forked a closed source version for Mac OS X
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
One thing I wouldn't mind seeing is CUPS + Gutenprint + Foomatic
Jim Walker wrote:
>> On 30/07/07, Korey Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> It is true that users alone will not make Open
>>> Solaris into a great product, but they are the final
>>> judge of its success. The Open Solaris community
>>> must remember who will use their software when the
>>> d
Dick Davies wrote:
> On 30/07/07, Korey Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> It is true that users alone will not make Open Solaris into a great product,
>> but they are the final judge of its success. The Open Solaris community
>> must remember who will use their software when the develo
Nasser,
> For instance, the code completion feature helps users with writing D
scripts.
> The code completion feature is not included in first release of the
> DTrace GUI.
Believe me, such features are very useful for seasoned programmers as
well. Not that I'm a D scripter by any means, but
> On 30/07/07, Korey Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It is true that users alone will not make Open
>> Solaris into a great product, but they are the final
>> judge of its success. The Open Solaris community
>> must remember who will use their software when the
>> development is done: the
The DTrace GUI puts more emphasis on ease of use. Users with different levels
of expertise in DTrace, can use the GUI to debug their systems, processes, and
applications.
Basically, it shortens learning curve and enables users to utilize DTrace
before they become an expert in writing D scripts
> At what?
Little old me probably can't help you if you are oblivious to why Windows is
the most successful personal computer software system of all time. You might
want to start looking at developer community and support, user community and
support, usability, system compatibility, and hardwa
rlhamil said:
> While I don't much like the notion of point-and-click (if it's not hard,
then you're not _learning_ anything, so why bother using up oxygen?)
mdemarco said:
> Leave the point and clickers behind.
> Command line is where we live! It is not dead and never will be. This is
> where th
The argument I hear -and have sometimes made is:
"Microsoft got into the back office -with a very lame server operating system,
because it was "ubiquitous" and perceived as "easy" to use, versus Novell,
Banyan, UNIX, MVS, VMS, etc., at the time."
Microsoft became ubiquitous because IBM was ubiq
On 31/07/07, MC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Most people use Windows because it came with their PC, not for any
> technical reason.
>
> It comes with their PCs because it is technically the best desktop OS. Dell
> doesn't sell Windows PCs instead of OS/2 Warp PCs because of a coin flip.
> Win
> I think a lot of people keep missing the point that
> Solaris' bread
> and butter is the enterprise server market. I don't
> know what the
> ratio of server to desktop installations is, but I'd
> guess that it's
> very tilted in one direction. Solaris shines on the
> server. Solaris
> can
> Most people use Windows because it came with their PC, not for any
technical reason.
It comes with their PCs because it is technically the best desktop OS. Dell
doesn't sell Windows PCs instead of OS/2 Warp PCs because of a coin flip.
Windows is simply the best. (Better than all the rest!)
On 30/07/07, Korey Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is true that users alone will not make Open Solaris into a great product,
> but they are the final judge of its success. The Open Solaris community must
> remember who will use their software when the development is done: the user.
Is S
Well,
Last night (31 July, 2007 Australian CST), I decided to go get my
Solaris Performance and Tools (Sun Microsystem Press / McDougall, Mauro
and Gregg) which happened to be on the bottom pile of a set of books on
my kitchen table.
Opening the book, the pages seemed decidedly and uniformly
> This is hugely unfair. Sun created the accessibility infrastructure that
> is used in GNOME based (and compatible with) the accessibility infrastructure
> used by Java. Sun has contributed a great deal back to the GNOME community
> and delivers well received value add products on top of GNOME
On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:49 PM, andrewk9 wrote:
> I agree entirely with this post. My thoughts:
>
> 1. We in the community should not be expecting Sun to be addressing
> all of the shortcomings in OpenSolaris. The community needs to be
> involved in a meaningful way in improving it. A first ste
> (Don't use a symlink, as packages delivering that
> directory will
> blow away the symlink and just make a mess of
> things.)
>
> ames Carlson, Solaris Networking
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ha, wish we had known this b/f we made the mess of things (& still have no clue
of what was g
>> Solaris is uniquely situated to make this dream a reality.
> > With the support of Sun Microsystems, resources
>
> Solaris is not very well positioned in the UI competition. Sun, it
> appears, has consciously chosen not to actively develop a desktop, but
> to patiently swallow whatever gnom
Hi d,
David McDaniel wrote:
> Wondering if anyone knows the reason mmap always returns space 64K aligned on
> 32 bit sparc apps. If many small files are mmap'd, lots of address space gets
> eaten up.
>
>
Here is what makes sense to me. If there's something I'm missing, let
me know.
64k pag
Hey andrewk9,
I shall reply to you, but my 2 cents applies to other comments in this thread;
so apols if I bang on about stuff that
you have not directly or indirectly commented on.
> 1. We in the community should not be expecting Sun to be addressing all of
> the shortcomings in OpenSolaris.
It seems that build 68 also has the same problem. Maybe something with the
graphic driver? Has it been changed from b67?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
David McDaniel wrote:
> Wondering if anyone knows the reason mmap always returns space 64K aligned on
> 32 bit sparc apps.
> If many small files are mmap'd, lots of address space gets eaten up.
> Also, can it be changed via a knob anywhere?
>
The ELF alignment requirement for 32bit executables
On 7/30/07, Edward McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Alan.
>
> I am somewhat confused regarding their approach. They are saying the are
> going to deliver these drivers, on one hand, but on the other hand they are
> claiming they cannot because they don't own all of the IP (that par
I agree entirely with this post. My thoughts:
1. We in the community should not be expecting Sun to be addressing all of the
shortcomings in OpenSolaris. The community needs to be involved in a meaningful
way in improving it. A first step to improving collaboration might be to add a
wiki to Ope
Thank you Alan.
I am somewhat confused regarding their approach. They are saying the are going
to deliver these drivers, on one hand, but on the other hand they are claiming
they cannot because they don't own all of the IP (that part of the development
efforts are owned and copyrighted by othe
Thanx dude!!! :o)
At last, can I continue...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Wondering if anyone knows the reason mmap always returns space 64K aligned on
32 bit sparc apps. If many small files are mmap'd, lots of address space gets
eaten up.
Also, can it be changed via a knob anywhere?
Thanks
-d
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 7/30/07, Orvar Korvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My mobo wont boot from any Solaris DVD. I have tried 3 different DVD players
> and several Solaris DVD. None will boot. Solaris Express developer comes only
> on DVD, no CD. I have several students that report that their computer wont
> boot
First I wanted one big slice, but as I am on vacation now, I have the time to
try something new:
slice name size(GB)
0 / 13
1 swap 2
3 /alt 13
4 /opt 6
5 /opt-alt 6
6 /pool 70
I will install one Solaris version on Slice 0, and another on S3. S0 will have
S4. S3 will have S5. I will mount them
Uh, let's see. Beautiful interface (as attractive as the Mac or Vista),
intuitively laid out, ease of use, UNIX (like), open source...it's already
here. You can download it or buy it.
Suse 10.2
Please look at this latest version, it is stunning. The beautifully designed
and intuitive layout
My mobo wont boot from any Solaris DVD. I have tried 3 different DVD players
and several Solaris DVD. None will boot. Solaris Express developer comes only
on DVD, no CD. I have several students that report that their computer wont
boot from Solaris DVD.
However, I can boot Windows XP CD and Sol
> To Ian Murdoch and the Open Solaris Community,
>
> As a long-time follower of the open source community,
> I stumbled across this forum a week ago and was
> intrigued by the activity taking place on Open
> Solaris. I spent some time reading posts, and over
> the day some concerns became clear t
>
> Just the same, I think having an environment available that can hide
> all of that away and that is robust enough that it's able to do so
> when things are going wrong would be great. I just suspect that it's
> far harder (read: expensive) to make that work in any reliable way
> than most woul
Anil Gulecha writes:
> Hi Korey,
>
> On 7/30/07, Korey Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The frustrating part is that it doesn't need to be this way. We now have
> > the technology to make the command line obsolete. Combo boxes and check
> > marks and tool tips could open up a world of fea
> I am trying to install x86 build 69 here, and the 3rd
> CD cant install correctly. There is always a/some
> package that says the install failed. I think it is
> kernel driver package, drmbr or something?
>
> I have tried 3 different DVD players, and 5 different
> CD-RW discs. Maybe I hade extre
> Solaris is uniquely situated to make this dream a reality.
> With the support of Sun Microsystems, resources
Solaris is not very well positioned in the UI competition. Sun, it
appears, has consciously chosen not to actively develop a desktop, but
to patiently swallow whatever gnome.org is pr
>I've always wondered if there isn't a way to restore the ability to
>do an upgrade after doing BFU. I don't know all the issues, does anybody
>know why you can no longer do an upgrade?
It's specifically disabled because, among other things, an upgrade would
save a copy of all ON files as file~11
Hi Korey,
On 7/30/07, Korey Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The frustrating part is that it doesn't need to be this way. We now have the
> technology to make the command line obsolete. Combo boxes and check marks
> and tool tips could open up a world of features to the general user. Simpl
Korey Peters wrote:
> To Ian Murdoch and the Open Solaris Community,
^^^
nit: it's Murdock.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
W. Wayne Liauh writes:
> We are trying to contribute as much as we could (to the OpenSolaris
> development) given our very limited resources. As such, almost all our
> Solaris desktop machines are configured in various multi-boot environments.
> On this particular machine, we have (50GB alloca
To Ian Murdoch and the Open Solaris Community,
As a long-time follower of the open source community, I stumbled across this
forum a week ago and was intrigued by the activity taking place on Open
Solaris. I spent some time reading posts, and over the day some concerns
became clear to me; conce
> We are trying to contribute as much as we could (to the OpenSolaris
> development) given our very limited resources. As such, almost all our
> Solaris desktop machines are configured in various multi-boot environments.
> On this particular machine, we have (50GB allocated for the Solaris
> part
ken mays wrote:
> "http://ati.amd.com/products/catalyst/linux.html#2
> We also actively
> assist developers in the Open Source community with
> their work, so if you absolutely require an open
> source driver for your graphics card, we can recommend
> using drivers from the DRI project, Utah-GLX pr
ken mays wrote:
> The ATI v8.39.4 release of device drivers for
Solaris
> supporting the ATI X1900 series graphic cards???
As far as I know, ATI has no plans to release Solaris
drivers themselves.
> ATI mentioned they support the open source
developers
> wanting to work on ATI video device driver
I've always wondered if there isn't a way to restore the ability to
do an upgrade after doing BFU. I don't know all the issues, does anybody
know why you can no longer do an upgrade?
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Jonathan Groll wrote:
>> Being relatively new to opensolaris, I downloaded and installed
Tom Haynes writes:
> Scott Rotondo wrote:
> > The first half-dozen paragraphs, describing the obstacles facing
> > external developers when the Apple source was still reasonably open,
> > seem eerily familiar.
[...]
> With the exception that Sun is trying to open things up. I.e., an
> external p
> Actually, gethrtime is in section 3C:
>
> "(3C)These functions, together with those of Section 2,
> constitute the standard C library"
>
> And indeed, if we do some further digging:
>
> http://docs.hp.com/en/B2355-60130/gethrtime.3C.html (HP-UX 11iv3)
>
> So, this says more a
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> One issue nVidia implimentation is the pixels are not cleared as the cursor
>> moved with the backspace or left arrow on the Mozilla or Firefox typing in
>> a HTML form, So the pixels of the cursor are not solid and have shifted and
>> on the left arrow characters t
Scott Rotondo wrote:
> Brian Gupta wrote:
>
>> Here's the basic truth about Apple and OpenSource:
>> http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html
>>
>
> The first half-dozen paragraphs, describing the obstacles facing
> external developers when the Apple source was still reasonably open,
Thanks a lot.
Michael
Derek Cicero 提到:
> When the datacneter went down it corrupted a bunch of the search
> indexes. I'm fixing it now.
>
> Derek
>
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> website-discuss is the best forum for reporting issues with the
>> website itself, including the forums.
>>
>> -Alan Coo
Where can I find build 68 on CD?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Brian Gupta wrote:
> Here's the basic truth about Apple and OpenSource:
> http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html
The first half-dozen paragraphs, describing the obstacles facing
external developers when the Apple source was still reasonably open,
seem eerily familiar.
s/Apple/Sun/g
s/20
We are trying to contribute as much as we could (to the OpenSolaris
development) given our very limited resources. As such, almost all our Solaris
desktop machines are configured in various multi-boot environments. On this
particular machine, we have (50GB allocated for the Solaris partition):
That doesn't paint a particularly pleasant picture. Let's hope, for the
sake of those that have "bet the farm" on CUPS, that it maintains a more
independent status. I don't expect that anything can disappear from it
or that there will be a significant fork, but the Open Source community
*may
I am trying to install x86 build 69 here, and the 3rd CD cant install
correctly. There is always a/some package that says the install failed. I think
it is kernel driver package, drmbr or something?
I have tried 3 different DVD players, and 5 different CD-RW discs. Maybe I hade
extreme unluck,
When the datacneter went down it corrupted a bunch of the search
indexes. I'm fixing it now.
Derek
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> website-discuss is the best forum for reporting issues with the
> website itself, including the forums.
>
> -Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
ken mays wrote:
> The ATI v8.39.4 release of device drivers for Solaris
> supporting the ATI X1900 series graphic cards???
As far as I know, ATI has no plans to release Solaris
drivers themselves.
> ATI mentioned they support the open source developers
> wanting to work on ATI video device driver
John Brewer wrote:
> Solarois 10u3 used the nv driver and OpenSolaris swtcihed snv_b65 from the nv
> to the nVidia I am not sure of all the reasons why maybe nVidia provides
> more feature enablement then what nv driver was Opensource?
Solaris 10u4 also switches to the nvidia driver. nv is o
Orvar Korvar wrote:
> True.
>
> ATI's has drivers only for Windows OS.
ATI has drivers for Linux as well, though they're usually behind
the Windows drivers. (For instance, the X1000 series was supported
on Windows about 6 months before they got a Linux driver out for it.)
--
-Alan Coo
Edward McAuley wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a source who has drivers for the ATI X1900 that will work
> on Solaris 10?
The only possible source I know of is the currently very-much-experimental
and under heavy development xf86-video-avivo drivers being produced by the
Xorg community reverse engine
Is anyone running any GPGPU code on Solaris? I ask because with AMD Fusion
coming down the road, it seems that most AMD64 machines will have access to
GPU based computation functions.
With Solaris and Sun moving to a highly threaded programming model
(Fortress), might these functions be incorporat
website-discuss is the best forum for reporting issues with the
website itself, including the forums.
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Li Qin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I always get 0 result, whatever I searched with the
Hi,
I always get 0 result, whatever I searched with the Forum search engine, for
instence:
There is a topic: Apple bought CUPS source code. When I input "Apple" as
keyword, I get nothing back.
I remember the search engine has ever worked before...
-
Michael
This message posted from open
Here's the basic truth about Apple and OpenSource:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html
-Brian
On 7/30/07, Norm Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> A couple of weeks ago, Mike announced that Apple bought CUPS back in
> February and is now employing him. From what I read, Mike will b
A couple of weeks ago, Mike announced that Apple bought CUPS back in
February and is now employing him. From what I read, Mike will be
working on something other than CUPS (don't know what) at Apple, but
will still be supporting CUPS. As for forking the code... For a while
now, the licensing
Hello:
Sometimes is not a question of driver's bug or install's bug.
I have an Acer t180 with a Marvell Yukon 88x8056, I tried with SKGE or Marvell,
but a core dumps and not work. I use Murayama's driver myk and edit
driver_aliases with a correct device id and it works. Perhaps is a question of
Brian Gupta writes:
> http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
Ah, a license fork. What fun!
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.49
On 7/30/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brian Gupta writes:
> > http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
>
> Ah, a license fork. What fun!
Personally I think this is a complete perversion of the open source
movement, and can't believe this hasn't gotten wider coverage
Shafayet Hossain writes:
> That mean i don't have to change /etc/inet/ipnodes in Solaris 10 update 4 and
> later. Is that correct? This document totally confused me. its saying that
It's correct.
> Why is this difference?
/etc/inet/ipnodes is now just a symlink to /etc/inet/hosts, as is
/etc/h
http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
On 7/30/07, Ché Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I heard that they bought cups but stated that:
>
> "Apple Inc. has trademarked the Common UNIX Printing System, CUPS, and
> CUPS logo. These names and logos may be used freely in any direct po
You mention XiG (Xi Graphics), do they even exist anymore?
Try http://www.xig.com/ and note that it times out...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I heard that they bought cups but stated that:
"Apple Inc. has trademarked the Common UNIX Printing System, CUPS, and CUPS
logo. These names and logos may be used freely in any direct port or binary
distribution of CUPS. To use them in derivative products, please contract Apple
Inc. for written
> I installed Solaris S10 06/06 or whatever, on a Dell
> D600 lappie, and a Inspiron 6000 lappie, without
> problems. Both worked fine.
Dell is starting to come around. Some of the problems I have had with Dell in
the past are as follows:
1) Off shore support.
2) Intel processors only (They are
> > It's a matter of pride to deliver a quality product that "just works" and>
> > > doesn't break something else.> > I write things for my own purposes and I
> > often need to use the high> resolution timers. I have no idea if that is
> > portable into the Linux world> and I guess I never care
Tirthankar wrote:
>> As I said, it doesn't support Nevada. Jam tomorrow is not any use to us.
>
> Its out now :)
We've spoken to the clustering folks already. Their advice is that if
we want to use clustering, we should stick to S10.
--
Alan Burlison
--
_
100 matches
Mail list logo
