Sorry Steve, I honestly don't know. I have yet to install a 64-bit Solaris on
bare metal, so not sure if it takes a lot longer to boot than 32-bit, but I am
guessing not by much. If we find anything out, I'll report back to this list
regarding the issue. Glad you have a work-a-round for the
Lisa wrote:
I have a T2000 (SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200) with firmware 6.4.6 and with all LDOM
required patches. I installed LDoms_Manager-1_0_1, but ldmd crashes and dumps
core during startup (see error below) (fatal error: HV MD major version
mismatch: found version 0, can only support version 1.)
Try adding the following to your /etc/power.conf
file:
cpupm enable
cpu-threshold 15s
I believe these keywords are in the the power.conf(4)
man page shipping
with snv_70b.
Then execute /usr/pmconfig. I think you'll find that
code has already
been written to reduce the
I have a Sony VGN-SZ4XWN/C laptop, which has integrated WiFi. The WiFi
basically works - I am sending this post via the WiFi. It uses the Intel
PRO/Wireless 3945ABG chip.
There is a switch on the front panel to turn the transmitter on/off. Trying to
boot with this in the off position is
The unthinkable has happened: SunOS backwards compatibility has been broken.
Broken:
`uname -a` returns some funky opensolaris bla bla bla string instead of the
standard
SunOS hostname 5.11 snv_## i86pc i386 i86pc.
Broken:
root's home directory is in /root; this is a SEVERE ERROR. We're not on
Oh yeah: and I can no longer log in as root. On the CONSOLE. Because if I
create an account for myself during the install, root will be turned into a
role.
If that wasn't bad enough, it's not a sudo role, that I could use and transfer
to HP-UX or IRIX, or AIX, oh no.
We have to be stubborn and
Hi
On Dec 2, 2007 12:50 PM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The unthinkable has happened: SunOS backwards compatibility has been broken.
Broken:
`uname -a` returns some funky opensolaris bla bla bla string instead of the
standard
SunOS hostname 5.11 snv_## i86pc i386 i86pc.
Broken:
On Dec 2, 2007 1:00 PM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yeah: and I can no longer log in as root. On the CONSOLE. Because if I
create an account for myself during the install, root will be turned into a
role.
If that wasn't bad enough, it's not a sudo role, that I could use and
The unthinkable has happened: SunOS backwards
compatibility has been broken.
Broken:
`uname -a` returns some funky opensolaris bla bla
bla string instead of the standard
SunOS hostname 5.11 snv_## i86pc i386 i86pc.
Understandable change for a non Sun OS. But I tend to agree that this
Understandable change for a non Sun OS. But I tend to
agree that this will make things bad for current
scripts.
OK, well, if that's the case, then there needs to be no further discussion.
I'll go back to my Solaris 10 and wait for Solaris 11 to come out. Buh-bye
OpenSolaris.
If that's the
This is debatable ... Can you provide pros and cons
for this from your
point of view?
For example, I have a package that delivers /.cshrc, /.login and /.logout.
Determining root's home directory via public interfaces is unreliable, namely
because such public interfaces aren't well defined. I
Since the very first time I booted Solaris Express Developer Edition 9/07
snv_70b X86 on this laptop (Sony VAIO VGN-Sz4XWN/C) there has been a long delay
in the boot process. The messages indicate something is amiss, but since it has
done this all the time, and it boots OK, I'm not sure how
Broken, Broken, Broken, Broken, . . . .
Now I know why I am so compellingly addicted to Solaris. Kudos Sun's
management for their willingness to take such bold actions, undoubtedly
accompanied by tons of well-oxidized midnight oil, that will finally take
Solaris to world dominance, or even
On Dec 2, 2007 6:30 PM, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Broken, Broken, Broken, Broken, . . . .
Now I know why I am so compellingly addicted to Solaris. Kudos Sun's
management for their willingness to take such bold actions, undoubtedly
accompanied by tons of well-oxidized midnight
On Dec 2, 2007 7:03 PM, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lalalalallaa
Is Sun even sure it's self what will do what and what will replace what? I
just get an email from somebody of this list saying Indiana will replace
SXCE and will be the basis for Solaris 11. Which is ff-ing funny since
On Dec 1, 2007 9:23 PM, Ben McGinnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) The cited project hasn't been closed down, just restructured (along
with other large chunks of Sun recently).
2) OpenSolaris' licensing has resulted in all released code
effectively being in the wild - those horses have
I too find /root an extremely poor choice; which part of root do
these people not understand?
Of course, if you then say but all the window and browser garbage in /?
I can only say that I think that /.mozilla should be linked to /dev/*mem
in order to ensure maximum damage when you start a
Is Sun even
sure it's self what will do what and what will
replace what?
I am definitely the least qualified person to comment on what Sun should or
should not have done. But I think if there is any doubt, there is always the
good 'ol faithful Solaris 10 (which is also surprisingly
Broken, Broken, Broken, Broken, . . . .
Now I know why I am so compellingly addicted to
Solaris. Kudos Sun's management for their
willingness to take such bold actions, undoubtedly
accompanied by tons of well-oxidized midnight oil,
that will finally take Solaris to world dominance, or
I've a Sony VAIO VGN-SZ4XWN/C laptop which is quite an odd laptop in that it
has two graphics chipsets. It has a high performance/high power consumption
Nvidia GeForce Go 7400 as well as a lower performance/low power consumption
integrated graphics in the form of the Intel GMA 950. There is a
Well, there is an mdb hack (enable cpudrv_direct_pm)
along with a couple
of ioctl(2) calls (PM_DIRECT_PM and
PM_SET_CURRENT_POWER) that could
give you direct control over the frequency. I'm not
convinced you really
want to go there though
I would like to 'go there'. I think it would be
On Dec 2, 2007 5:50 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The unthinkable has happened: SunOS backwards compatibility has been broken.
You are aware that Indiana hasn't gone through ARC yet and is an early
prototype; right?
Broken:
root's home directory is in /root; this is a SEVERE ERROR.
On Dec 2, 2007 12:20 PM, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 7:03 PM, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lalalalallaa
Is Sun even sure it's self what will do what and what will replace what? I
just get an email from somebody of this list saying Indiana will replace
SXCE
On Dec 2, 2007 7:40 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is debatable ... Can you provide pros and cons
for this from your
point of view?
For example, I have a package that delivers /.cshrc, /.login and
/.logout. Determining root's home directory via public interfaces is
On Dec 2, 2007 5:22 PM, Josh Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 7:40 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is debatable ... Can you provide pros and cons
for this from your
point of view?
For example, I have a package that delivers /.cshrc,
But I will not stick with a bastardized Solaris, I
can damn well guarantee that.
As my fellow Hawaiian Tim Scanlon suggested in a separate thread, when we get
frustrated with Solaris Express (I don't think Indiana is even ready for
discussion yet--outside the Indiana Forum) we can always seek
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Well, there is an mdb hack (enable cpudrv_direct_pm)
along with a couple
of ioctl(2) calls (PM_DIRECT_PM and
PM_SET_CURRENT_POWER) that could
give you direct control over the frequency. I'm not
convinced you really
want to go there though
I would like to 'go there'.
I've a Sony VAIO VGN-SZ4XWN/C laptop which is quite
an odd laptop in that it has two graphics chipsets.
It has a high performance/high power consumption
Nvidia GeForce Go 7400 as well as a lower
performance/low power consumption integrated graphics
in the form of the Intel GMA 950. There is
Personally I really like the /root thing. But, big but, that's only
because I hate all those /.ghatever :) files in my root filesystem.
And that just because the root user used a browser or some other GUI
program.
And that brings me to my main point, why would 'root' ever, ever use a
Hi I need some assistance in the following: -
I am trying to strip the current solaris build off the drivers which may not be
really essential. I would like to not make the audio drivers, crypto drivers,
1394, the dtrace binaries etc. a part of the final tar ball.
If any one can add on to this
Bhaskar,
You might be interested in these blogs.
http://blogs.sun.com/szhou/entry/build_a_minimal_solaris_image
http://solaristhings.blogspot.com/2006/07/how-small-can-you-make-open-solaris_21.html
-Gangadhar
Bhaskar Jayaraman wrote:
Hi I need some assistance in the following: -
I am
UNIX admin wrote:
The unthinkable has happened: SunOS backwards compatibility has been broken.
Broken:
`uname -a` returns some funky opensolaris bla bla bla string instead of the
standard
SunOS hostname 5.11 snv_## i86pc i386 i86pc.
Given all the other incompatibilities you note (and
32 matches
Mail list logo
