At the present time, Solaris installation will overwrite your MBR. You can
edit and use your /boot/grub/menu.lst file in Solaris to add chainloader(s) to
boot into Windows (already created) and Linux (to be created by you).
But if you want to keep your Linux version of the GRUB, one of the easi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:34 PM, RBell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've discovered that Nexanta is not an option:
> NexentaStor Developer Edition is time-unlimited and full feature product
> that can be deployed with up to one terabyte of user data.
>
> I plan to use way more than 1TB. (For ins
Thank You Andrew that did work with the Bios settings
Now my drives are detected as IDE
i have data on them so i dont plan on formatting them to a new file system
Thank You as well Brandon
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-dis
Brandon
oh god i am so sorry i kept replying your reply via email
i did not see a link in the email earlier to this site.
i just replied to you again a 2nd time via email and it says.
Hi
Thank You for your reply again
i guess that means i would have to have pci controller cards
as well i never
Oscar Usifer wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We need a hardware RAID 5 card supported by Open Solaris and/or (preferably)
> Solaris 10 that performs well. Previously we were using 3ware 9550SXU-4LP,
> but found that the device drivers won't be out until Q3 - Q4 time frame for
> Open Solaris. We have a Super
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:17 AM, heather valentine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i dont really have seperate controllers
> as they are built onboard on my PM8M-V MSI Board
That's got a VIA VT8237 controller, which I don't believe is on the
HCL. The device detection tool will tell you for certain
* Joomla ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thank you for reading my post.
>
> I was wondering if any member of this forum can help me with the following
> query:
>
> I have an Intel system (desktop) with three HDDs having dual-boot
> configuration...with Windows 2003 Server on the first hard-disk,
>
2008/4/23 Oscar Usifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Folks,
>
> We need a hardware RAID 5 card supported by Open Solaris and/or (preferably)
> Solaris 10 >that performs well. Previously we were using 3ware 9550SXU-4LP,
> but found that the device >drivers won't be out until Q3 - Q4 time frame for
> Op
Thank you for reading my post.
I was wondering if any member of this forum can help me with the following
query:
I have an Intel system (desktop) with three HDDs having dual-boot
configuration...with Windows 2003 Server on the first hard-disk, Ubuntu Linux
on the second & third HD being blank
Folks,
We need a hardware RAID 5 card supported by Open Solaris and/or (preferably)
Solaris 10 that performs well. Previously we were using 3ware 9550SXU-4LP, but
found that the device drivers won't be out until Q3 - Q4 time frame for Open
Solaris. We have a Supermicro X7DBU MOBO *1, and wanted
I've discovered that Nexanta is not an option:
NexentaStor Developer Edition is time-unlimited and full feature product that
can be deployed with up to one terabyte of user data.
I plan to use way more than 1TB. (For instance to keep all my dv-videos while
editing, and as raw tapes, backups of m
Yes, you can create devices in the non-global zone's filesystem from the global
zone.
--
Darren
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Just installed Solaris Express Community Edition ( sol-nv-b87-x86-dvd.iso ) on
a HP desktop (Nvidia FX 5200) and I was happily surprised to see that Compiz
was working right after the installation without any juggling (and it was
installed by default). Now I don't know if SXCE always had Compiz
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
> * Kyle McDonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> andrew wrote:
>>
>>> Support for using ZFS as the root filesystem was added in build 88, but
>>> there is not yet support for installing Solaris to a ZFS filesystem in the
>>> installer. This is expected soon - possibl
* Kyle McDonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> andrew wrote:
> > Support for using ZFS as the root filesystem was added in build 88, but
> > there is not yet support for installing Solaris to a ZFS filesystem in the
> > installer. This is expected soon - possibly build 90. If you want ZFS root
> >
Thank you for your reply
i dont really have seperate controllers
as they are built onboard on my PM8M-V MSI Board
If i make a 2nd attempt to install Solaris later on i will use that detection
tool
Thanks for your help
This message posted from opensolaris.org
It is extremely unlikely that the problem is Solaris's support for your drives.
It is probably due to your SATA controller not being supported by the version
of Solaris you were running. Please visit this location where you can run the
Sun Device Detection Tool:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/
It is the SPARC CD. I mounted it on a SPARC machine. Usually Boot directory
on disk 1 is a directory not a link. I found out since set_install_server
failed complaining Boot directory doesnt exist.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
ope
andrew wrote:
> Support for using ZFS as the root filesystem was added in build 88, but there
> is not yet support for installing Solaris to a ZFS filesystem in the
> installer. This is expected soon - possibly build 90. If you want ZFS root
> support, wait for build 88 and use jumpstart to perf
Hi
Currently i use FreeBSD, OpenBSd (my Server), and Vista
on Different machines
i had been wanting to learn solaris but unfortunatly
my two Samsung drives are not detected even when i tried Belenix
Both of my Sata drives are not in the HCL Compat List
Samsung models HD501LJ and SP2504C
When i
Support for using ZFS as the root filesystem was added in build 88, but there
is not yet support for installing Solaris to a ZFS filesystem in the installer.
This is expected soon - possibly build 90. If you want ZFS root support, wait
for build 88 and use jumpstart to perform an install. If you
On 04/21/08 20:54, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>
>> * Kyle McDonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> If my counting is right, b87 should be out any time now.
>>>
>>> What are the changes I can expect to see in it? or where can I read
>>> about them my
For this month's meeting we have a change of venue, just across the road
from the Santa Clara Auditorium, we will be meeting in SCA07, known as the
Mansion. This is a very special venue, and I will remind our community
that we will be using one of California historical buildings, no different
t
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Grigoris Beis wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> Is there a way to filter out the pstack command so that it does not print
> the stack output of every thread of my multithreaded application but only of
> the one thread that crashes every time?
>
>
>
> For instance, if thread#1 i
I'm trying to create a chroot environment within a zone so that I can run a
separate sshd process within it that is configured to use a separate LDAP
server from the main system passwd DB. I have a script to create a chroot
environment but it uses "mknod" to create devices which fails because "m
25 matches
Mail list logo