seem to do anything
Any ideas ?
A bug ?
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
without providing a --host option.
I sort of guess this is related to solaris 11 now beeing 64bit only ?
Doesn anyone know how I could recover a working gcc (apart from
installing the ips provided gcc which is gcc-4.5.2 and recompiling my
gcc 4.6.2) ?
Thanks for any hint
Bruno
Example from
/include/stdio.h
pkg:/system/header@0.5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.1
# pkg install system/header
OMG, you are right, I had to reinstall the zone, because it wouldn't
upgrade, and I forgot to re-install system/header...
Thank you so much
Bruno
___
opensolaris
, but I had the same problem when booting with the liveUSB so I
suspect it will not yield result, maybe the logs...
I will also try to tweak the BIOS
Bruno
On 21/11/2011 19:11, Niveditha Rau wrote:
HI Bruno,
From the log file, looks like X started ok. Can you do a pstack of
the Xorg pid? Also
Well you gave me the good hint.
Everything works fine if I disable the VT-D option in the BIOS.
Thanks a lot
Bruno
On 11/21/11 08:34 PM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello Niveditha,
Thank you so much for your answer.
I'll experiment along the lines you give and report back later on
tonight or tomorrow
, no change. I check from Xorg.0.log that the
server is actually loading vesa.
I tried to disable modules. No effect.
Any ideas ? it is in deed strange that corruption occurs with both intel and
vesa drivers, or ?
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
in advance
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 17/10/2011 18:49, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Oh, then you probably want to try disabling the new bitmapped console by
changing the console flag in the grub boot options for the kernel to
console=force-text.
-alan-
On 10/17/11 09:44 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your answer
On 05/11/11 12:29 AM, Brandon High wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
I attached an external usb cd drive and tried to boot from the S11E cd, but I
just get thrown into GRUB. I have tried to boot from winxp and win7 install cd,
and it
Hello,
I'm using a thinkpad x201 with this wifi card...
I saw a driver was planned in early 2010 (Thread: RealTek RTL8192SE Series WiFi
Device Driver (PSARC/2010/077 Self Review))
Does anyone know what happened with it ? I would be very interested to test it
Thanks
Bruno
Le 04/12/10 12:04, Volker A. Brandt a écrit :
Attempting to get ndis to work for my broadcom wireless. I was able to
configure the 386 portion but get a:
section relocation failed
when I try to run ndiscvt on the amd64 version.
Any ideas on how to cope with this?
Sorry to disappoint you, but
allright, card pretty cheap as far as I remember.
On the other hand, there might be another card somewhere which will work
with a driver included in solaris 11 express... which would probably be
easier.
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
... back in business (hope it will work OK)
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Yes, hence my surprise to find dom0 x64 support in Solaris 11 Express.
Anyway, even w/ issues, that is the only solution for me to upgrade, and that
is a good surprise.
I use a couple of HVM (windows) guests on my home server (ow a windows 2008r2
test AD controller) installed on zvols and it
, currently stuck with snv_134
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sorry for the last post, the original mail comes here, and explains...
Message original
Sujet: [osol-discuss] [OT] Openindiana mailing list
Date : Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:16:49 -0500
De :Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com
Organisation : Still searching...
Pour :
+1
Osol + XVM + zfs vols + snapshots was/is VERY COOL.
- Mail Original -
De: Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de
À: Paul Durrant pdurr...@gmail.com
Cc: Darko Hojnik no-re...@opensolaris.org, xen-disc...@opensolaris.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 14 Octobre 2010 11h02:27 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne
How about OpenOS ? ;)
On 3-8-2010 22:35, Florian Ermisch wrote:
well then, how about SUeNix? ;)
2010/8/3, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com:
Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
SolarOS
Rolls right off the tongue ;)
And anything that looks close enough to the name of an
Well, personally i would prefer if they all kept their work within
Oracle/Sun, but let's see what this Illumos project will be..
Interesting that they have people from Nexenta, and the site is hosted
within Stanford University Network...so back to home? ;)
Bruno
On 2-8-2010 21:43, Edward
Based on my experiences, VDI solutions are not good for any
graphics-intensive environment...
If you want esxi you will also need Vcenter and that's not free ;)
Bruno
On 17-7-2010 21:11, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
Has anyone here used Oracle (formerly Sun) VDI in a SMB environment?
I'm
a company cannot stop their
developments in technologies/products just because one, important,member
left the company...
So if Oracle wants to push *solaris* / *opensolaris* they will..
Bruno
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed
/
He seems to update his job more frequently than his website:
http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/users/lavender/
Jörg
BTW...Greg Lavender is now working at Cisco
Bruno
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean
.
Apologies to the vast majority of the list members who clearly aren't
the cause of the problem.
Tottaly agree..except for the shutting it down entirely. I hope we
don't need to go that far.
Bruno
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed
downgrade the FW of the broadcom.
Bruno
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I did the downgrade using the setup utility where you usually upgrade
the drivers..however there's also the possibility of downgrade , and
that's what i have done.
Here's the output of a booting server :
bnx0: BCM5709 device with F/W Ver4060004 is initialized
Bruno
On 14-7-2010 18:21
On 28-6-2010 21:41, dd pn wrote:
Will be interesting to see benchmarks! :o)
For X4800 see,
http://blogs.sun.com/BestPerf/entry/20100628_x4800_spec_cpu2006_rate
Let's hope this is just an omission , so far, but on the OS
compatibility list of all these new servers, Opensolaris doesn't
Maybe i'm not seeing the big picture, but i thought that the all ZFS
appliance line runned in some custom OpenSolaris, making OSOL a
revenue product.
But than again...what do i understand about business anyway...
Bruno
On 28-6-2010 21:52, John Plocher wrote:
In Oracle's mind, one
Hi,
Thanks to all that made this really nice howto.
BTW, after this procedure is it still possible to boot into snv_134
environment, i.e will the grub.conf be updated to have have snv_134 and
snv_142 boot entries?
Thanks,
Bruno
On 21-6-2010 8:15, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
Thanks to Rich Lowe, I
Hi Hernan,
Thanks for the tip!
P.S Any noticeable changes in snv_142 ?
On 21-6-2010 8:44, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
Hi, Bruno!
Yes, I booted again into snv_134, and then back into onnv_142.
Take special care to the instructions about image-update!!!
If you want to see this command list
Le 06/06/10 01:50, Brandon High a écrit :
Is it possible to use zones and xen or virtual box simultaneously on
the same host?
Sent from my Nexus One.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I use bothe zones and
the right tool for the right job.
Bruno
On 3-6-2010 13:19, bsd wrote:
Matrurity of Linux
That is a funny mix of words, and certainly not how I would conjoin them.
Consider SLES9 was released only a few years ago, yet with an ext3 filessytem
you cannot grow it online! In AIX 3.2, circa 1995
, no problem detected. Everything seems to be
working.
Any idea of what is happening ?
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
history.
Is it intended ?
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
=15879
Thanks,
Bruno
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks in advance,Bruno
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
in snv_132 but fixed in
snv_134 .
Bruno
On 15-4-2010 14:01, Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Oracle
UK wrote:
Ah, I had missed the reference to snv_132 in your original mail. In
that case, it's possible this is simply a repeat of 6897282, which was
fixed in snv_133, and you may now
help would be highly valuable.
Thanks in advance,
Bruno Sousa
The significant messages are :
Apr 13 11:12:04 san01 savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic:
Freeing a free IOMMU page: paddr=0xccca2000
Apr 13 11:12:04 san01 savecore: [ID 385089 auth.error] Saving compressed system
Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ?
Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one
would be dropped?
Thanks,
Bruno
On 14-4-2010 16:50, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
George Koutras wrote:
the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from
servers would love to
use either btrfs or ZFS on same server..damn i can even imagine one
server with 3 filesystems in use , like :
/ --- formatted as ext3/ext4
/dedup --- formatted as ZFS for dedup ;)
/data --- formatted with btrfs
Anyway..its just plain curiosity.
Bruno
On 14-4-2010 17:31
the workaround
mentioned in
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6875273 .
I sure hope this issue can be fixed, otherwise the project may suffer a
big turn, and i want to avoid this at all cost.
Once again , thanks for all your support .
Regards,
Bruno
On 14-4-2010 12:16, Brian
Try booting livecd iso ?
Bruno
- Mail Original -
De: Frank Lahm frankl...@googlemail.com
À: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 17 Mars 2010 10h19:31 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: [osol-discuss] snv_134 doesn't boot after
You mean you :
1. booted successfully the livecd
2. installed successfully from the desktop env
3. rebooted
4. got the grub menu screen
5. choosed the normal boot item
and that it fails to load ?
try to boot in text mode / single mode :
- edit the grub entry (type e)
- add -s at the end of kernel
I usually get rid of the splash screen by commenting out splashimage,
background lines (btw your forground looks quite strange, I do not have it,
comment it out as well)
I maybe made a mistake, my grub says console=vga
Good luck
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
the rename ? reinstalling these packages
doesn't work (no update needed), uninstalling them wo'nt go because they are
required ?
I'd like to avoid the obvious hard path (uninstalling OO and sunstudio, then
uninstalling all concerned pkgs, the reinstall OO and sunstudio).
Any ideas ?
Bruno
May be not ALL are renamed :
# pkg list |grep SUNW
SUNWPython2.4.6-0.133 installed --r--
SUNWPython26 2.6.4-0.133 installed --r--
SUNWarc 0.5.11-0.133installed --r--
SUNWbzip
OK I understand, I cannot remove them !
Sorry for the noise
Still it would have been nicer to get SunStudioi, Openoffice, etc... depend on
the new pkgs, guess time will come soon ;-)
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
On 03/ 4/10 01:02 PM, John Martin wrote:
On 03/ 4/10 12:01 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
if i do truss -p 630 (Xorg process) i get and endless repetition of:
/1:setcontext(0xFD7FFFDFEB60)
/1:Received signal #14, SIGALRM, in ioctl() [caught]
/1:ioctl(14, 0x46445
On 03/ 5/10 08:40 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
As far as I understand that bug report, some
hardware configuration setting (GTT) is lost
after a suspend / resume? Did you use
suspend / resume before Xorg locked up?
No.
Just browsing the web with firefox.
I do not think suspend/resume does
Do you find the following error message in
/var/log/Xorg.0.log ?
intel_bufmgr_fake.c:392: Error waiting for fence:
Device busy.
No. I find in Xorg.0.log :
[...]
Error in I830WaitLpRing(), timeout for 2 seconds
pgetbl_ctl: 0xcffc0001 getbl_err: 0x0100
ipeir: 0x iphdr: 0x5404
Hello,
It just happened again.
It seems related to running firefox + flash
# ps ax |grep Xorg
629 vt/2 R 5:37 /usr/bin/Xorg :0 -nolisten tcp -br -auth /var/run/gdm/a
# truss -p 629
/1: Received signal #14, SIGALRM, in ioctl() [caught]
/1: ioctl(14, 0x46445, 0xFD7FFFDFF3FC)
additional info :
dumped Xorg core :
# gcore -o xorg.core 629
gcore: xorg.core.629 dumped
random ~ # mdb xorg.core.629
Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 libsysevent.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 libproc.so.1
ld.so.1 ]
::stack
libc.so.1`ioctl+0xa()
libdrm.so.2`drmCommandWrite+0x1b()
As far as I understand that bug report, some
hardware configuration setting (GTT) is lost
after a suspend / resume? Did you use
suspend / resume before Xorg locked up?
No.
Just browsing the web with firefox.
I do not think suspend/resume does work on my hw. I can not even close the lid
and
Hello,
I've a laptop running b133. I noticed since b131-b132 freezes (random? but
always when doing something with the UI).
X freezes and I cannot revive it.
It just happend
I can however access it via ssh.
What would be the best way to debug ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
unplug and plug usb mouse : disk activity, nothing on the screen
/var/log/messages says :
Mar 4 05:12:19 random genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info]
/p...@0,0/pci1028,1...@1d,2/mo...@1 (hid0) removed
Mar 4 05:12:23 random usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 1.10 device (usb458,3a)
operating at low
if i do truss -p 630 (Xorg process) i get and endless repetition of:
/1: setcontext(0xFD7FFFDFEB60)
/1: Received signal #14, SIGALRM, in ioctl() [caught]
/1: ioctl(14, 0x46445, 0xFD7FFFDFF3FC) Err#4 EINTR
/1: lwp_sigmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x2000, 0x) =
not think pkg is a bad tool, some rough edges, some missing
features, certainly.
My purpose was more to help than to complain.
Bruno
PS : Whatever, I bought myself 4G of ram for my laptop today, so
hopefully my pains are over (and, yes, the change feels quite incredible
well the whole install took 2 hours
for 1 pkg !!
it seems that disk read/write here is the bottleneck (?).
iostat -D 2 shows my hd busy at around 100%
iosnoop reports a lot of access by pkg :
UID PID DBLOCK SIZE COMM PATHNAME
[...]
0 1666 R 35943541 4096pkg none
to what it feels withy pkg.
At least you had some output to watch ;-)
and I never had to stop browsing the web because I was updating my system.
My main grief is not the time it takes, but that you cannot do anything during
this time. Even shell windows go grey.
Bruno
--
This message posted from
On 02/27/10 03:50 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
I ran pkg install with truss, in the hope of
discovering why it takes so long to complete,
especially AFTER it has reported that every thing is installed.
You are running a fresh install of b133, correct?
yes, install from livecd as I couldn't
On 02/27/10 05:31 PM, Rich Burridge wrote:
Bruno Damour wrote:
well the whole install took 2 hours
for 1 pkg !!
it seems that disk read/write here is the bottleneck (?).
Maybe you are seeing the effects of:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14507
In other words, you installed
On 02/27/10 04:09 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
# tail pkg.log
1.7255schedctl() = 0xFEC69000
0.0002 sigaction(SIGINT, 0x08047650, 0x080476D0) = 0
421.4744open(/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/messages.mo,
O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT
On 02/27/10 04:09 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
# tail pkg.log
1.7255schedctl() = 0xFEC69000
0.0002 sigaction(SIGINT, 0x08047650, 0x080476D0) = 0
421.4744open(/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/messages.mo,
O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT
time
(100M vs 180M). I suspect an interaction between pkg memory
consumption and zfs arc_cache.
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
trying to
upgrade from b132 to b133.
Any use of pkg install is still VERY LONG in the end, I mean after the
install completion.
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
it means ?
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 02/25/10 09:54 AM, Hemantha Holla wrote:
On 25/02/10 12:31 PM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
On osol-b133 noticed that the first call to vmstat always yields a
significantly different figure for freemem than the subsequent calls :
# vmstat 2
kthr memorypage
obvious explanation I'm missing ?
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
like b132 did (even in other
cases than upgrading).
I will report if it does.
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 02/22/10 09:37 AM, solarg wrote:
hello all,
after upgrading my Dell laptop to b133, i am disappointed that this
problem is present yet.
I'm not sure that these two bugs are rleated to it:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6885862
, that was the longest part.
I'm still wondering why pkg is so long, barely usable I would say,
especially the long disk write AFTER it reports everyting to have been
downloaded and installed !! Even for a single package install... I tried
to disable index rebuild but nope.
Bruno
Data)
Probably you need a ntfs driver.
Belenix provides one, see :
http://www.genunix.org/distributions/belenix_site/binfiles/README.FSWfsmisc.txt
Then you have to find the name of your data partition and mount it somewhere
what gives you the output of zpool list ?
Bruno
you have
NOT get unresponsive shell when
running an update).
Thanks for your help
Bruno
PS : I must say it never happened with my homle server and 8Gb mem, so
ram seems to help ;-).
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 02/21/10 01:46 PM, Bruno Damour wrote:
On 02/21/10 12:12 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
I've noticed that since b132 my laptop freezes under
load. Just dies without any message other than
memory pressure, tcp defensive mode on.
Probably short of memory. I've _only_ 1GB which used
to be quite ok
On 02/21/10 04:35 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
it freezes during the Creating plan when running pkg image-update,
either from b131 be or b132 (I kept both).
it freezes during the evaluating SUNWgcc package
when trying to ugrade from gui
I know the memory pressure msg is not directly related, but I
On 02/21/10 07:02 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
Tried once again, it seems to freeze each time when
there is about 4K ram left.
Is that a 32- or a 64-bit system?
64-bit
I do have 4G swap, almost not used at all.
Hmm, that is unexpected. How did you watch
swap space usage? swap
, even taking forever, or die in a more informative
way.
bruno
PS : this never happened, and I did upgrade very build from at least b111 I
think
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
probable is that you have to delete the cache, config,
and gnome files, I cannot see why, say, a .emacs would matter
Good luck
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Yes, but no color in text
- Mail Original -
De: Lasse Osterild lass...@unixzone.dk
À: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Envoyé: Lundi 8 Février 2010 11h40:07 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [osol-discuss] strange grey highlight in shell?
I kept on trying to migrate my pool (see previous threads) and had the idea to
try the -d option on the receive part.
The system reboots immediately.
I suppose this is not a feature
Any ideas ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Here is the log in /var/adm/messages
Feb 8 16:07:09 amber unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice]
Feb 8 16:07:09 amber ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ff014ba86e40:
Feb 8 16:07:09 amber genunix: [ID 169834 kern.notice] avl_find() succeeded
inside avl_add()
Feb 8 16:07:09 amber unix: [ID 10 kern.notice]
are a pain in the...
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
...@base | zfs receive tank/test/Video
This did what i neededi hope this helps
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Bruno Damour br...@ruomad.net
mailto:br...@ruomad.net wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to migrate my data pool to get dedup and compression.
I tried :
# zfs send -RD d
/zones/avalon/ROOT/zbe-2 333M 165G 994M legacy
What should I do to clean up this ?
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
OK understood
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On second thought it seems the ps command is switchning between bsd behaviour
(old /usr/ucb/ps) if options are not preceded with '-' and new solaris
behaviour if there is a '-'
Is that correct ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Ok
Thanks for your detailed explanation !!!
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
amount
of memory
1627 bruno 13M 5552K sleep 590 0:00:00 0.0% gconfd-2/1
However, I found that Xorg memory usage is still very high :
1446 root 448M 150M sleep 450 0:04:53 4.4% Xorg/3
especially compared to the one on my home server, with basically the same
is very high, nearly 200M on my system with 1G ram, so you can imagine
the result
Is this expected behaviour ?
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Connection is over wifi (malo0), but its working quite well AFAIK.
# cat /etc/release
OpenSolaris Development snv_131 X86
Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Well, you are certainly right.
The card in my home server is a fairly recent nvidia :
(II) Jan 28 06:16:36 NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce 9500 GT (G96) at PCI:6:0:0
(GPU-0)
(--) Jan 28 06:16:36 NVIDIA(0): Memory: 1048576 kBytes
while in my laptop I have an onoard intel :
PCI:*(0:0:2:0)
.
What's going on ? Is this a known problem ? Is 1G ram unsufficient to run a
desktop on a laptop ? How can I investigate further ?
prstat -s rss shows X and gconf using at least 1/4 of memory !
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
2468 bruno 480M 157M
drivers are different, the laptop has an intel integrated graphic
device, the server runs nvidia.
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I think I ran into this, had to remove and recreate publisher to get the update.
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello
Something strange just happened to me, on my brand fresh installed osol-b131
system.
libstat was corrupted while I was just using kstat.
suddenly issuing kstat -n cpu_info0 gave a segfault.
the libkstat has zero length
reboot stops complaining about libkstat corruption
any idea ?
It seems
Well, I copied the file back from live-cd so I'm back online.
Investigating, I found in the console output (when it happend) :
[output of kstat|grep misc]
amber ~ # libkstat.so.1 = /usr/lib/libkstat.so.1
bash: libkstat.so.1: command not found
amber ~ # kstat -n cpu_info0
Can't load
Hello
I did in fact build cyrus imap many on each of the last ten or so releases of
SXCE and as of yesterday succeeded to build it on osol-b131.
I can post you detailed procedure if you are interested.
What are you building on ?
Bruno
- Mail Original -
De: Brandon Hume hume-ml+open
The bug is still unavailable ?
I would have contributed the workaround, but...
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
OK, thank you for answering.
Since you do know the cause of the bug, do you have any idea if the workaround
I'm using (ie : replacing the ip module from b131 with the one from b130) may
create other problems ?
I didn't ran in any so far.
Bruno
- Mail Original -
De: Alan Coopersmith
Well, I tried to just replace the ip module with the old one from b130 and the
problem went away.
I have not run into any other problem yet
FWIW
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
explanation should be available as this is _fixed_ in b132.
Furthermore The bug report is not available.
Bruno
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
