ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
1. The Feb 2010 patched version of Sun Studio 12u1 worked for building
most of the other OSOL consolidations. There is another 'patched' version
called Sun Studio 12.1.1 in the IPS_134 repo.
I forgot to mention that there are other reasons for not using
It is the first OpenSolaris based distro that allows to compile the
OpenSolaris
base (onnv or Illumos) on a free redistributable distribution.
Both Nexenta and OSUNIX have been doing this for a while AFAIK.
On 25 September 2010 18:25, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Andrew Stormont andyjstorm...@gmail.com wrote:
It is the first OpenSolaris based distro that allows to compile the
OpenSolaris
base (onnv or Illumos) on a free redistributable distribution.
Both Nexenta and OSUNIX have been doing this for a while AFAIK.
No, they both rely on
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall 2010) won't compile ON_147
and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio 12.2?
Guess updating those docs would help...
~ Ken M.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Ken Mays wrote:
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall 2010) won't compile
ON_147 and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio 12.2?
Guess updating those docs would help...
What docs need to be updated? The ON docs from opensolaris.org clearly state
that Sun Studio 12 with the September
Ken Mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall 2010) won't compile
ON_147 and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio 12.2?
Do yu have a pointer? Yesterday, I was not able to find something newer than
sunstudio12u1-patched-ii-2010Feb-sol-x86.tar.gz
and
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Ken Mays wrote:
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall 2010) won't compile
ON_147 and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio 12.2?
Guess updating those docs would help...
What docs need to be updated? The ON docs from
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Ken Mays wrote:
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall 2010) won't compile
ON_147 and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio 12.2?
Guess updating those docs would help...
What docs need to be
--- On Mon, 9/27/10, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
wrote:
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall
2010) won't compile ON_147 and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio
12.2?
Do yu have a pointer? Yesterday, I was not able to find
something newer than
ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 9/27/10, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
wrote:
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall
2010) won't compile ON_147 and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio
12.2?
Do yu have a pointer? Yesterday, I was not able
Good work, Joerg.
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
SchilliX-0.7.2 has been published yesterday at:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
It is the first OpenSolaris based distro that allows to compile the OpenSolaris
base (onnv or Illumos) on a free redistributable distribution.
WARNING: do not use studio-12.1 to compile onnv or Illumos.
A missing dependency for svc:/network/ipsec/ipsecalgs:default was added to
permit
the service to come up reliably.
Known issues:
The i18n code was replaced by OSS and already supports more than the free bits
from Oracle but the country tables are far from being complete.
There is however
William Bauer bqba...@gmail.com wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any information available about Schillix--at least I
haven't found any. What is the goal of this distribution? Is twm the only
window manager? If so, I suspect this is aimed for server versus desktop
use, or you're really
Jörg, have you considered adding IPS to Schillix? Apart from that, is there
some sort of comparison matrix putting Schillix into context to other
distributions out there somewhere? You know, I'm still searching for an Indiana
alternative. Could be Schillix, maybe? ;-)
Cheers
Mobi.
--
This
SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle.
This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks.
see:ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix
Note that SchilliX-0.7.1 is compressed with xz. You need xz uncompress the
image. For people who do not have xz availaible, there is a
--- On Tue, 8/31/10, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
wrote:
From: Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Subject: [osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on b147+ available
To: develo...@lists.illumos.org, opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Tuesday, August
ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 8/31/10, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
wrote:
From: Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Subject: [osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on b147+ available
To: develo...@lists.illumos.org, opensolaris
--- On Tue, 8/31/10, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
From: Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Subject: [osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on
b147+ available
To: develo...@lists.illumos.org,
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date
Is ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix down or overloaded? I can't get to it at all...
and the mirrors (ftp.uni-ulm.de/mirrors/schillix and
ftp.uninett.no/pub/unix/schillix) only show 0.7.0.
I'll try be patient, and check again tomorrow :)
Mike
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Mike Kirk mike.k...@halcyoninc.com wrote:
Is ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix down or overloaded? I can't get to it at
all... and the mirrors (ftp.uni-ulm.de/mirrors/schillix and
ftp.uninett.no/pub/unix/schillix) only show 0.7.0.
I am sorry, it seems that a collegue did turn off the downloads
devsk wrote:
Note: SFW_147 brings in Samba 3.5.4. Xnv_147+ bring
in Freetype 2.4.2.
Ken: A quick question. How are you able to get those updates when the rest of
us can't? Do you have access to Oracle's internal repos?
The rest of you can too - the JDS, SFW, X code are still published
the
There doesn't seem to be any information available about Schillix--at least I
haven't found any. What is the goal of this distribution? Is twm the only
window manager? If so, I suspect this is aimed for server versus desktop use,
or you're really stuck on twm!
I couldn't even log in until I
From: Joerg Schilling [mailto:joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Joerg, I'm going to recommend xz instead of (or in addition to)
bzip2. It's
much faster and compresses better. My experience is 2x faster and 2x
better
compression.
Oh - Specifically if you use compression level 1.
Edward Ned Harvey sh...@nedharvey.com wrote:
today, I put SchilliX-0.7.0 out.
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/SchilliX-0.7.0.iso.bz2
Joerg, I'm going to recommend xz instead of (or in addition to) bzip2. It's
much faster and compresses better.
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Stefan Parvu wrote:
How IPS handles the process of applying patched ? AFAIK OSOL does not
really have the concept
of a patch, right ? Or ?
Right - IPS simply has new versions of packages, in which the packaging system
determines
[I *really* doubt that Alan misunderstands SVr4 packaging in any way
whatsoever...]
You are right, from a purely technological authorship perspective (stuff
written 20-25 years ago by ATT -vs Sun), patching, network aware
installation, package repositories, automatic dependency computation,
This is not an IPS issue; this is a distribution issue. Remember that
all of the bits on pkg.opensolaris.org have been redistributable for a
long time. That means that if someone wanted a mirror in say, Finland,
they could have set one up. For that matter, one could have been setup
on genunix.org
On 07/24/10 08:23 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 04:17 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 07/25/10 10:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 06:37 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
...
To stir the pot here, since we are discussing a Community Distro
as opposed to a SUN/Oracle distro, IPS when used
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Stefan Parvu wrote:
IPS tries to be a network pkg management system. It needs to be simple
... list of good ideas ...
These are all things that could easily be addressed, and aren't per-se
reasons to abandon IPS. If it was important, these things could be
True. Im not reffering here as a drop of IPS but rather as a understanding point
for future and how this compares against SVR4. Anyway for future community
distro
, if any, would be good if we can keep one pkg management system and be
compatible
between distros.
IPS should have fixed all these
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
True. Im not reffering here as a drop of IPS but rather as a understanding
point
for future and how this compares against SVR4. Anyway for future community
distro
, if any, would be good if we can keep one pkg management system and be
today, I put SchilliX-0.7.0 out.
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/SchilliX-0.7.0.iso.bz2
Joerg, I'm going to recommend xz instead of (or in addition to) bzip2. It's
much faster and compresses better. My experience is 2x faster and 2x better
Star-1.5.1 is also available from Blastwave.
The star on SchilliX has one new feature:
1) create a meta data only archive with star -c -dump -meta . arch
2) extraxt the archive uwing star -xp -xmeta -force-hole arch
in order to create all plain files as 100% empty holes
New is the
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in transport
performance when used with a properly configured web and/or depot server.
Do you know how frustrating it is when
On 07/24/10 07:51 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in
transport performance when used with a properly configured web and/or
depot
On 07/24/10 11:55 PM, HeCSa wrote:
...
On 07/24/10 08:23 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
...
The source is there, and you can build it you know ;)
Alternatively, you could use the bits someone made available on
genunix.org for b142:
http://genunix.org/dist/richlowe/README.txt
On 07/24/10 03:51 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in transport
performance when used with a properly configured web and/or depot server.
Do
On 07/25/10 06:27 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 11:55 PM, HeCSa wrote:
...
On 07/24/10 08:23 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
...
The source is there, and you can build it you know ;)
Alternatively, you could use the bits someone made available on
genunix.org for b142:
Stefan Parvu wrote:
How IPS handles the process of applying patched ? AFAIK OSOL does not really
have the concept
of a patch, right ? Or ?
Right - IPS simply has new versions of packages, in which the packaging system
determines which files are different from what you've already installed
HeCSa wrote:
On 07/24/10 07:51 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in
transport performance when used with a properly configured web
On 24/07/2010 00:17, Ian Collins wrote:
I really do think you should accept the inevitable and accept IPS,
otherwise SchilliX runs the risk of becoming an evolutionary dead end.
If any OpenSolaris distributions are to survive post-Oracle, they must
be able to share packages with each other
On 24/07/2010 02:39, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed
and decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
The pkg(5) project has been one of the few projects that is actually
very
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert Milkowski mi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
On 24/07/2010 02:39, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not
Shawn Walker shawn.wal...@oracle.com wrote:
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
The pkg(5) project has been one of the few projects that is
To all those who seemed to have been confused by my reply to Ian's post please
note the following:
1) My comments were intended as a response to Ian's assertion of the
'inevitability of IPS'.
2) The example I provided, Nexenta, is pretty strong evidence that
incorporation of IPS is not
Ian asked:
The kernel distribution for Blastwave maybe?
That would depend on people like Dennis Clarke. But I did have a little
fun in a conceptual build. I'll see if Blastwave (BW) or Genunix will let me
post the ON binaries there.
Src:
-rw-r--r-- 1 kmays csw 83309980 Jul 24 15:33
The only problem I can see in regards to how IPS was introduced that perhaps
more explanation to the community at the project inception about why IPS and
not something else would do good... a little bit more open dialog with the
community before you start coding on why IPS, what are its design
On 07/25/10 02:57 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
To all those who seemed to have been confused by my reply to Ian's post please
note the following:
1) My comments were intended as a response to Ian's assertion of the
'inevitability of IPS'.
The inevitability of IPS I was alluding to is
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
Star-1.5.1 is also available from Blastwave.
The star on SchilliX has one new feature:
1) create a meta data only archive with star -c -dump -meta . arch
2) extraxt the archive uwing star -xp -xmeta -force-hole arch
in order to create
On 07/24/10 06:37 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
...
To stir the pot here, since we are discussing a Community Distro
as opposed to a SUN/Oracle distro, IPS when used remotely from
halfway across the world has large performance issues. For example
in Bangalore I personally know no one
On 07/24/10 10:08 AM, Stefan Parvu wrote:
The only problem I can see in regards to how IPS was introduced that perhaps
more explanation to the community at the project inception about why IPS and
not something else would do good... a little bit more open dialog with the
community before you
On 07/24/10 07:06 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walkershawn.wal...@oracle.com wrote:
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
The
On 07/25/10 10:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 06:37 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
...
To stir the pot here, since we are discussing a Community Distro
as opposed to a SUN/Oracle distro, IPS when used remotely from
halfway across the world has large performance issues. For example
On 07/24/10 04:17 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 07/25/10 10:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 06:37 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
...
To stir the pot here, since we are discussing a Community Distro
as opposed to a SUN/Oracle distro, IPS when used remotely from
halfway across the world has large
Shawn Walker shawn.wal...@oracle.com wrote:
It isn't mean to be in SXCE, so wasn't put there. I think you
misunderstand its purpose.
Maybe IPS was not developed for integration, then I could understand
why it did not appear on SXCE.
IPS will not be used by e.g. swiss banks the way it
On 07/24/10 04:25 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walkershawn.wal...@oracle.com wrote:
It isn't mean to be in SXCE, so wasn't put there. I think you
misunderstand its purpose.
Maybe IPS was not developed for integration, then I could understand
why it did not appear on
On 07/25/10 11:23 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 04:17 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 07/25/10 10:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in transport
performance when used with a
Hi,
today, I put SchilliX-0.7.0 out.
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/SchilliX-0.7.0.iso.bz2
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/README.install
Changes since SchilliX-0.6.7:
- Updated to use OpenSolaris Nevada Build 130
- Updated to use new
Cool;)
My test box was just about to get fresh install of FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE, but
I'll take Schillix for a quick test spin first.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
thanks. I never tried previously the distro, but I will install this into one
of my test
machines. Is star part of the distro ? Hope so :)
Would be nice to have a list somewhere what we get as plus on top of build130,
all tools.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
P.S.; Joerg, did I miss it or are there no md5 hashes for this?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
Did a few quick tests under VirtualBox (for now).
The 64 bit version did not play well, showing unresolved symbols and dropping
to recovery console.
The 32-bit version was OK, though:
# uname -a
SunOS unknown 5.11 schily130 i86pc i386 i86pc
# ifconfig -a
lo0:
--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
wrote:
From: Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Subject: [osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.0 ready for testing
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, distribution-disc...@opensolaris.org
Date: Friday, July
Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net wrote:
Cool;)
My test box was just about to get fresh install of FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE, but
I'll take Schillix for a quick test spin first.
It still has no GDM and an old version of Xorg I compiled in late 2005.
I hope that someone will compile a recent
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
thanks. I never tried previously the distro, but I will install this into one
of my test
machines. Is star part of the distro ? Hope so :)
Star-1.5.1 is also available from Blastwave.
The star on SchilliX has one new feature:
1) create a meta data
Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net wrote:
P.S.; Joerg, did I miss it or are there no md5 hashes for this?
See the file README.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
On 07/24/10 10:40 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ken Gundersonkgund...@teamcool.net wrote:
Cool;)
My test box was just about to get fresh install of FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE, but
I'll take Schillix for a quick test spin first.
It still has no GDM and an old version of Xorg I compiled in
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner. Moreover, interestingly enough, the most popular,
by far, thing to come out of Open Solaris is Nexenta, which is most definitely
not IPS based. And ironically enough, using something more
This is an idea, but SchilliX (or a fork of it) could remain a pure
server-oriented core distro (without X or desktop cruft). The desktop stuff
could come by way of IPS integration and/or CSW/SFW/other packages...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
The pkg(5) project has been one of the few projects that is actually
very open. It was the first to use
On 07/24/10 01:23 PM, Ken Mays wrote:
This is an idea, but SchilliX (or a fork of it) could remain a pure
server-oriented core distro (without X or desktop cruft). The desktop stuff
could come by way of IPS integration and/or CSW/SFW/other packages...
The kernel distribution for
Ken, et al,
IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and decidedly
not FOSS manner.
What shoving? It seems to me that those of you who are wailing and
moaning that you want a version of OpenSolaris with SVr4 packages are
conspicuous by the absence of an OpenSolaris
Changes since SchilliX-0.6.1:
- Updated to use OpenSolaris Nevada Build 82
- Applied a patch t the hsfs filesystem module (see directory patches)
to work around a cpio hard link handling bug.
- SchilliX-0.6.2 now includes a SVr4 package database in an unpacked
Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither Linux nor WinXP/Vista write UFS or ZFS.
WinXP/Vista does not support to read Rock Ridge at all
Linux does not support hard links with Rock Ridge
The only choice you have is Solaris ;-)
Actually, there is a Windows Resource kit for
W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jörg,
Is there any way to install SchilliX directly from
the iso image w/o first burning to a CD/DVD? Thanks.
Well, you could mount the DVD or it's image and
follow the instructions...
Where can I find the instructions?
W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jörg,
Is there any way to install SchilliX directly from
the iso image w/o first burning to a CD/DVD? Thanks.
Well, you could mount the DVD or it's image and
follow the instructions...
Where can I find the instructions?
Hi Jörg,
Is there any way to install SchilliX directly from
the iso image w/o first burning to a CD/DVD? Thanks.
Well, you could mount the DVD or it's image and
follow the instructions...
Where can I find the instructions?
What OS do you like to do this from?
What else do you
Changes since SchilliX-0.6:
- Updated to use OpenSolaris Nevada Build 81
- Added libC to allow using C++ programs
- /sbin/sh (and thus /bin/sh and /bin/jsh) now include an
editable command line history and a file name completion.
This has been implemented by
G: This release does (currently) not fit on a CD
anymore.
You need to write the image SchilliX-0.6.1.iso to a
DVD to be able to
boot it.
Hi Jörg,
Is there any way to install SchilliX directly from the iso image w/o first
burning to a CD/DVD? Thanks.
This message posted from
Changes since SchilliX-0.6:
:-)
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 schily81October 2007
$ uname -a
SunOS unknown 5.11 schily81 i86pc i386 i86pc
$ cat /etc/release
SchilliX-0.6.1
Copyright 2005 Joerg Schilling All Rights Reserved.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Changes since SchilliX-0.6:
:-)
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 schily81October 2007
$ uname -a
SunOS unknown 5.11 schily81 i86pc i386 i86pc
$ cat /etc/release
SchilliX-0.6.1
Copyright 2005
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Changes since SchilliX-0.6:
- Updated to use OpenSolaris Nevada Build 81
- Added libC to allow using C++ programs
- /sbin/sh (and thus /bin/sh and /bin/jsh) now include an
editable command line history and a file name completion.
W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G: This release does (currently) not fit on a CD
anymore.
You need to write the image SchilliX-0.6.1.iso to a
DVD to be able to
boot it.
Hi Jörg,
Is there any way to install SchilliX directly from the iso image w/o first
burning to a CD/DVD?
Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Copyright 2005 Joerg Schilling All Rights Reserved.
based on
Solaris 11 nv81 X86
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How much of Shillix is open source? I would guess you depend on the same
closed stuff that SXCE does?
There is less CSS in SchilliX.
IIRC, CSS is
- on-closed-bins-nd.i386.tar.bz2
- devpro-SUNWlibC-closed-bins-20060918.i386.tar.bz2
If I
Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ref: www.genunix.org
We have the latest/greatest SchilliX, along with NexentaCP and the
Nexenta APT package repository (updated every 4 hours) available at
Genunix.org. Let the downloads commence! :)
Thank you for updating genunix.org with a recent
Hello Joerg,
Good news Joerg!
However - is it a one-time shot or do you have some plans to move it
forward?
Do you have some plans how do you want diffrentiate SchilliX from
SXCE, Indiana, Nexenta, ... ?
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowskimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Milkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Joerg,
Good news Joerg!
However - is it a one-time shot or do you have some plans to move it
forward?
I am not able to forward as fast as before, but I am able to do things
again as I don't have a highly time consuming job as in 2006 to stop
Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Would you be so kind as to update www.schillix.org ( .com .de etc )
Click on Announce, the modifications on http://schillix.berlios.de/
have been done before the files were copied to the ftp server.
Also include the MD5 hash on the
Have you looked at the kernel build done by the
Nexenta team referring to Nevada b81/82 backported
patches to Nevada b80 that they used for Nexenta
RC2?!?
Otherwise, great to see 'Schillix' back in the game!
Maybe Ubuntu Server 7.10 equivalent... ?
~ Ken Mays
-
Hi all,
as a result from upgrading to snv b80, the ISO image unfortunately
does not fit on a CD anymore. You need to use a DVD
Changes since SchilliX-0.6:
- Updated to use OpenSolaris Nevada Build 80
- Now using a non-DEBUG build of the OS.
- New keyboard layout
Ref: www.genunix.org
We have the latest/greatest SchilliX, along with NexentaCP and the
Nexenta APT package repository (updated every 4 hours) available at
Genunix.org. Let the downloads commence! :)
Congrats to Joerg Schilling and Team Nexenta.
Happy Friday!
Al Hopper Logical Approach
Hi all,
Would you be so kind as to update www.schillix.org ( .com .de etc )
Also include the MD5 hash on the homepage :
bash-3.2$ /opt/csw/bin/gmd5sum SchilliX-0.6.iso.bz2
4645fb4ae754e536caa2d3668a7e7494 SchilliX-0.6.iso.bz2
Dennis
___
Hi all,
Hello and thank you for this release. I knew you were working on it and we
still need a slick installer but first steps first.
I'll go get it right away and then see if I can boot it and use it to burn
dual layer DVD's :-) The latest release of cdrecord has not gone very
well for
Great job Joerg!
wrt. Ubuntu/Nexenta NCP roadmap is here:
http://www.nexenta.org/os/DevelopmentRoadmap
NCP 1.5 will be Hardy-based. Hardy is upcoming next LTS (Long Term
Support) release of Ubuntu repository. In April this year.
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 10:56 -0800, ken mays wrote:
Have you
Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Hello and thank you for this release. I knew you were working on it and we
still need a slick installer but first steps first.
I'll go get it right away and then see if I can boot it and use it to burn
dual layer DVD's :-) The latest
Last Friday, SchilliX-0.5.2 has been released.
The main advantage is that it now includes a SVr4 package data base
that should allow to install nearly all Blastwave packages.
Note that the biggest problem with Blastwave packages now is that
SUNWlibC does not look to be freely redistributable. If
Schillix 0.5.1 represents an the release of a
OpenSolaris Live-CD distro now based on Sun's Nevada
build 35 and Xorg's X11 6.9.0.
Being sort of a newb, and not being able to find my answers by searching, can
you clarify something for me? Is Schillix basically a 1-CD install of SX/SXCR
but
[i]I want SOLARIS but want to sort of have a minimalistic start for web servers
and such. Also would like Windowmaker or some other cool GUI instead of JDS.
Even the minimal install of SX still seems to have package dependencies not
sorted out.[/i]
brbr
I think you might benefit from Eric's
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
