On Monday 14 January 2008 05:52:13 Jerry Houston wrote:
Basil Chupin wrote:
bullshit. I have found the dreaded dog to be absolutely worthless.
I don't have the eating cpu complaint, but a google desktop it aint...
ROFL!
BUT!...don't ever mention google in polite society or a
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:12 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 22:29 +, not disclosed wrote:
It is not a beagle issue - it is a SUSE packaging issue, we all know what beagle does
and how it performs - for a huge number of people it is a
On Thursday 17 January 2008 12:02, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
(I wouldn't have required a full quote of the last post, either).
^^
s/I/It
--
Stefan Hundhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG
On Thursday 17 January 2008 06:46, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I'm not putting that crap back on my system just
to file a bug which they already know about.
I think you all made your respective points sufficiently clear now.
(I wouldn't have required a full quote of the last post, either).
Can we now
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 11:48:29 am Aaron Kulkis wrote:
...
That's a highly selective sample you have there,
totally ignoring the vast majority which complain
about beagle..and ONLY beagle, being a resource hog.
1) Ubuntu HORRIBLY SLOW...even after removing beagle!
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:12 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 22:29 +, not disclosed wrote:
For the love of all that is good and holy about our mailing list... WILL
YOU PLEASE TAKE THIS INCESSANT BITCHING to the Beagle mailing list???
I'm tired of a)
Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2008 Kevin Dupuy:
File
A
Bug.
Or chat with them on irc.gnome.org #dashboard. Helpful people really.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 14 January 2008 11:40:08 pm Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I cannot believe that the devs are NOT aware of this
it's been this way for several years, and they haven't
done shit about it. Which indicates that they just
aren't interested in fixing it.
And WHAT exactly makes you think
On Monday 14 January 2008 06:35:18 pm Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I'll admitt that I've had one -1- issue with it, when it made my box a
slow hog, and that was when someone sent me a borked .doc file, that
made beagle choke. Deleted the file, and no, none, whatsoever problems
since.
That this
On Monday 14 January 2008 06:49:03 pm Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
Perhaps all the main commenters here should subscribe to the Beagle
mailing list, and have this discussion there. Otherwise, I don;t see
what the point of having this discussion on the openSUSE list is.
I
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:49 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 16:03 +0100, Clayton wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this -
For the love of all that is good and holy about our mailing list... WILL
YOU PLEASE TAKE THIS INCESSANT BITCHING to the Beagle mailing list???
I'm tired of a) this constant repetition of an old thread when not all
of us have a problem, yet it is taking up half the mailing list messages
on a
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 22:29 +, not disclosed wrote:
For the love of all that is good and holy about our mailing list... WILL
YOU PLEASE TAKE THIS INCESSANT BITCHING to the Beagle mailing list???
I'm tired of a) this constant repetition of an old thread when not all
of us have a
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 14 January 2008 06:49:03 pm Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
Perhaps all the main commenters here should subscribe to the Beagle
mailing list, and have this discussion there. Otherwise, I don;t see
what the point of having this discussion on the openSUSE
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 22:29 +, not disclosed wrote:
For the love of all that is good and holy about our mailing list... WILL
YOU PLEASE TAKE THIS INCESSANT BITCHING to the Beagle mailing list???
I'm tired of a) this constant repetition of an old thread when not all
of us
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
How do you figure that?
Maybe once Beagle works a bit better it should be in the default
install, but right now... given its horrible performance (for a large
number of people), I would say Beagle should not be in the
M9. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Kulkis schreef:
At what point is a user with 10-20 years of experience
using computers expected to start behaving like something
other than a complete novice who has never used an
electronic device in his entire life.
Do you
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I have a dozen or so OpenSUSE 10.x installations here, not one person leaves
Beagle stuff running because it causes so many
I have a dozen or so OpenSUSE 10.x installations here, not one person leaves
Beagle stuff running because it causes so many problems.
Yep we always remove it and set up locate which is useful and light weight...
_
Express
Basil Chupin wrote:
bullshit. I have found the dreaded dog to be absolutely worthless.
I don't have the eating cpu complaint, but a google desktop it aint...
ROFL!
BUT!...don't ever mention google in polite society or a family
forum.
But isn't the enemy of my enemy my friend?
--
To
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 16:06 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
PerfectReign wrote:
On Sat, January 12, 2008 7:33 am, peter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PerfectReign wrote:
| If you don't like it, don't install it. There's no one holding your
| fingers to
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate beagle and either remove it
or ask someone to remove it for them.
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate beagle and either remove it
or ask someone to remove it for them.
Exactly. Other than a few on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-14-08 10:17]:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate
man, 14.01.2008 kl. 16.03 +0100, skrev Clayton:
snip
Exactly. Other than a few on this mailing list, I have yet to meet
ANYONE who likes or uses Beagle. The issue is not whether or not
these people do or do not use a desktop search tool... it's because of
the major performance impact that
Clayton wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate beagle and either remove it
or ask someone to remove it for them.
Exactly. Other than a
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 16:03 +0100, Clayton wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate beagle and either remove it
or ask someone
This thread definitely qualifies as a zombie 'cause it
just won't die. It's not pure enough to be a born-again
thread and it hasn't sucked any blood so it isn't an
undead. Zombie it is.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 12:35 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Clayton wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate beagle and either remove it
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 16:03 +0100, Clayton wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate beagle and either remove it
or ask
Bjørn Lie wrote:
man, 14.01.2008 kl. 16.03 +0100, skrev Clayton:
snip
Exactly. Other than a few on this mailing list, I have yet to meet
ANYONE who likes or uses Beagle. The issue is not whether or not
these people do or do not use a desktop search tool... it's because of
the major
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 12:35 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Clayton wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
I doubt this - all the users we have hate beagle and
Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 11:17:50 am Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I have seen that, and as guy was decision maker in my case I left him
alone. It was easy to show respect and point better way, but some people
take that as a insult, not help. They look at help as an attempt to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Kulkis schreef:
At what point is a user with 10-20 years of experience
using computers expected to start behaving like something
other than a complete novice who has never used an
electronic device in his entire life.
Do you
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 01:34 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 11:17:50 am Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I have seen that, and as guy was decision maker in my case I left him
alone. It was easy to show respect and point better way, but some people
take that as a
On Monday 24 December 2007 12:34:55 am Aaron Kulkis wrote:
...
USING THE TOOLS OF HIS JOB IS ***PART*** OF HIS JOB.
If you owned a racing team, would you continue to employ
a driver who refused to learn how to handle a skid? Or
who refused to learn how to use the appropriate transmission
PerfectReign wrote:
On Sat, January 12, 2008 7:33 am, peter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PerfectReign wrote:
| If you don't like it, don't install it. There's no one holding your
| fingers to the keyboard.
I'm tired of some arguments.
If you like beagle install it. If
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 16:06 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
PerfectReign wrote:
On Sat, January 12, 2008 7:33 am, peter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PerfectReign wrote:
| If you don't like it, don't install it. There's no one holding your
| fingers to the
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
bullshit. I have found the dreaded dog to be absolutely worthless. I
don't have the eating cpu complaint, but a google desktop
David C. Rankin wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
I'll go for not throwing up dependency errors if uninstalling, but it
definitely needs to be in the default install. Most users will want
Beagle.
bullshit. I have found the dreaded dog to be absolutely worthless. I
don't have the eating cpu
Kai Ponte wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 08:28, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
snippage
I just don't understand why it works so bad on such a good computer
and an average data load.
Simple, Gary.
It's poorly designed and/or written, because it's
behavior while executing is very careless, and
On Sat, December 22, 2007 3:09 pm, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kai Ponte wrote:
The thing needs a complete overhaul.
Excellent idea, Aaron.
I think I just read you volunteering.
Wrong.
Here you go...
I don't need this application in the first
place. Why would I waste my time when there
are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PerfectReign wrote:
| If you don't like it, don't install it. There's no one holding your
| fingers to the keyboard.
I'm tired of some arguments.
If you like beagle install it. If you don't leave it. This is a free world.
But beagle is a default
On Sat, January 12, 2008 7:33 am, peter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PerfectReign wrote:
| If you don't like it, don't install it. There's no one holding your
| fingers to the keyboard.
I'm tired of some arguments.
If you like beagle install it. If you don't leave
James Gardner wrote:
I guess I'm kind of new here, but this thread is really starting to annoy me.
Users are what users are. If they were highly knowlegable, most of us would be
out of work. They don't WANT to know the geeky stuff. So what? I don't WANT
to know how to rebuild my
Robert Smits wrote:
On December 24, 2007 09:26:53 am Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:24, James Knott wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:11, James Knott wrote:
...
Boilers requires a specific trade to install service, because
when water heats,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-12-24 at 22:55 -0800, Robert Smits wrote:
On December 24, 2007 03:54:30 pm Carlos E. R. wrote:
In my country, hot water systems do not boil the water. And there is a
relieve valve.
Boilers are not used to heat water, they are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-12-24 at 23:08 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
...
Those engineers.
They have thought on everything to minimize effect of failed elements.
Except computer engineers: if the program fails, they shrug, smile, and
call it a bug :-P
Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Monday 2007-12-24 at 22:55 -0800, Robert Smits wrote:
On December 24, 2007 03:54:30 pm Carlos E. R. wrote:
In my country, hot water systems do not boil the water. And there is a
relieve valve.
Boilers are not used to heat water, they are used to generate
On Tuesday 25 December 2007 01:02:57 am Dave Plater wrote:
I just had a look at the suse factory repository and there is a version
of beagle dated 24th maybe they got the message?
I looked in changelogs and I can't find any changes in last few days.
It is probably automatic rebuild because
On Tuesday 25 December 2007 06:51:05 am Hans Krueger wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Monday 2007-12-24 at 22:55 -0800, Robert Smits wrote:
On December 24, 2007 03:54:30 pm Carlos E. R. wrote:
In my country, hot water systems do not boil the water. And there is a
relieve valve.
On Sunday 23 December 2007 11:03:42 pm Stevens wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 18:11, Terry Eck wrote:
From Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:
idiot, 1: a person afflicted with idiocy; esp: a feebleminded person
having a mental age not exceeding three years and requiring complete
Rajko M. wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 11:03:42 pm Stevens wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 18:11, Terry Eck wrote:
From Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:
idiot, 1: a person afflicted with idiocy; esp: a feebleminded person
having a mental age not exceeding three years and
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:56:18 am Dave Plater wrote:
Computers are far more complex than plumbing, even in the most
rudimentary use. Book that describes computer basics has few hundred
pages. How many pages is needed to describe plumbing from A to Z ?
carefull you don't insult
On Monday 24 December 2007 03:06:41 am Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:56:18 am Dave Plater wrote:
...
Merry Christmass to you too.
Merry Christmas and happy New Year, Dave.
--
Regards,
Rajko
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:56:18 am Dave Plater wrote:
Computers are far more complex than plumbing, even in the most
rudimentary use. Book that describes computer basics has few hundred
pages. How many pages is needed to describe plumbing from A to Z ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 15:53, James Knott wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 15:14, James Knott wrote:
...
snip
Shall we deny access to these things to people who cannot pass a
test on
Stevens wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 18:11, Terry Eck wrote:
From Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:
idiot, 1: a person afflicted with idiocy; esp: a feebleminded person
having a mental age not exceeding three years and requiring complete
custodial care.
I think you mean an
Rajko M. wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 11:03:42 pm Stevens wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 18:11, Terry Eck wrote:
From Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:
idiot, 1: a person afflicted with idiocy; esp: a feebleminded person
having a mental age not exceeding three years and
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:45, Rajko M. wrote:
Stevens,
Be careful calling the names and showing so little understanding how big
is human kind knowledge.
Doctor, lawyer, financial advisor, teller, car mechanic, electronic
repairer, plumber, electrician, roofer, etc, etc, don't complain
Rajko M. wrote:
Doctor that doesn't know plumbing is not considered as unusual, but in your
opinion the same doctor that doesn't know how to use computer is?!
What's wrong in this picture?
Computers are far more complex than plumbing, even in the most rudimentary
use. Book that describes
On Monday 24 December 2007 04:05:52 am Dave Plater wrote:
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:56:18 am Dave Plater wrote:
Computers are far more complex than plumbing, even in the most
rudimentary use. Book that describes computer basics has few hundred
pages. How many pages is
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 04:05:52 am Dave Plater wrote:
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:56:18 am Dave Plater wrote:
Computers are far more complex than plumbing, even in the most
rudimentary use. Book that describes computer basics has few
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:11, James Knott wrote:
...
Boilers requires a specific trade to install service, because when
water heats, it expands and releases steam, which cause a significant
increase in pressure. A boiler that ruptures under pressure is
comparable to a bomb.
Even
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:11, James Knott wrote:
...
Boilers requires a specific trade to install service, because when
water heats, it expands and releases steam, which cause a significant
increase in pressure. A boiler that ruptures under pressure is
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:24, James Knott wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:11, James Knott wrote:
...
Boilers requires a specific trade to install service, because
when water heats, it expands and releases steam, which cause a
significant increase in
On Monday 24 December 2007 08:08:21 am James Knott wrote:
Imagine going to your doctor and saying I'm not
feeling well, fix the problem and not providing any further info.
Great number of conversations with doctors, or any other professional, or
tradesman, start with similar type of
Rajko M. schreef:
I'm comming from country where plumber can connect hot water to wrong valve
and it can burn customer, in the worst case. Energy supply to water heater is
under control of gas or electrical installer,
Sounds familiar
including all thermostats, and
it is inspected by
? Be HAPPY you get to deal with dumb users. Without
them, you may be living in a shelter.
-Original Message-
From: Rajko M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 24, 2007 11:32 AM
To: opensuse@opensuse.org
Subject: Re: [opensuse] Why beagle?
On Monday 24 December 2007 08:08:21 am James Knott wrote
On Monday 24 December 2007 12:00:02 pm James Gardner wrote:
I guess I'm kind of new here, but this thread is really starting to annoy
me. Users are what users are. If they were highly knowlegable, most of us
would be out of work. They don't WANT to know the geeky stuff. So what?
I don't
On Monday 24 December 2007 08:17:21 am Stevens wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:45, Rajko M. wrote:
Stevens,
Be careful calling the names and showing so little understanding how big
is human kind knowledge.
Doctor, lawyer, financial advisor, teller, car mechanic, electronic
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 12:51, Stevens wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 17:27, Randall R Schulz wrote:
No, it is the responsibility of the practitioners of IT to make its
artifacts accessible and useable to people without the need for an
understanding of the inner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2007-12-23 at 16:26 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
The problem is (to use my automobile analogy again), we
have users who can't even be bothered to learn the
difference between the brake and accelerator pedals, and
do the equivalent of
On Monday 24 December 2007 05:54:30 pm Carlos E. R. wrote:
If a plumber connects a hot water system wrong it can explode an
destroy the computer downstairs as well as half the house.
It seems that I'm missing something, but forgive me and let me now how
that can happen.
Boilers
On December 24, 2007 09:26:53 am Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:24, James Knott wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 09:11, James Knott wrote:
...
Boilers requires a specific trade to install service, because
when water heats, it
On December 24, 2007 03:54:30 pm Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Monday 2007-12-24 at 12:11 -0500, James Knott wrote:
If a plumber connects a hot water system wrong it can explode an
destroy the computer downstairs as well as half the house.
It seems that I'm missing something, but forgive me and
I just had a look at the suse factory repository and there is a version
of beagle dated 24th maybe they got the message?
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 05:54:30 pm Carlos E. R. wrote:
If a plumber connects a hot water system wrong it can explode an
destroy the computer
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 12:29:33 PM -0500, Aaron Kulkis
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Most computer users' behavior is equivalent to drivers who are not
yet qualified to have a license...they need constant supervision.
Why?
Because they *REFUSE* to learn even basic principles of effective
On Saturday 22 December 2007 13:42, Rajko M. wrote:
None up to now told what version of SUSE is used.
I did. Hey, over here. I did. (hand waving frantically)
Didn't seem to make any difference, though.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Saturday 22 December 2007 17:27, Randall R Schulz wrote:
No, it is the responsibility of the practitioners of IT to make its
artifacts accessible and useable to people without the need for an
understanding of the inner workings of those technologies.
Randall Schulz
Ahhh, the Holy Grail
On Sunday 23 December 2007 12:51, Stevens wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 17:27, Randall R Schulz wrote:
No, it is the responsibility of the practitioners of IT to make its
artifacts accessible and useable to people without the need for an
understanding of the inner workings of those
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 21:57 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:10 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Stevens wrote:
Today Kevin Dupuy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I'm reading right now, I'm presuming either you have no
documents, or they are all on your
On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 10:30 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 08:57:50 pm Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
OK, here's the issue: you're not most people. I'm not most people. All
of us subscribed to this mailing list are probably not most people. And
On Sunday 23 December 2007 15:49, Kevin Dupuy wrote:
...
90% of computer users are idiots,
Which includes those who will not trim quoted material when replying to
email...
and that's not going to change since these people don't want to take
the time to sit down and organize their stuff.
Kai Ponte wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 09:13, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 18:06:37 Stevens wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 10:30, Rajko M. wrote:
Catering to idiots only encourages them to continue
their idiotic behavior.
On Sunday 23 December 2007 15:49, Kevin Dupuy wrote:
snip
Catering to idiots only encourages them to continue
their idiotic behavior.
90% of computer users are idiots,
Hey! I resemble that remark...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Saturday 22 December 2007 11:17:50 am Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I have seen that, and as guy was decision maker in my case I left him
alone. It was easy to show respect and point better way, but some people
take that as a insult, not help. They look at help as an attempt to make
them feel
On Sunday 23 December 2007 18:11, Terry Eck wrote:
From Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary:
idiot, 1: a person afflicted with idiocy; esp: a feebleminded person
having a mental age not exceeding three years and requiring complete
custodial care.
I think you mean an ignorant person.
Nope.
Bryen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 02:03 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-12-20 at 14:31 -0600, Bryen wrote:
Unless of course that solution destroys the performance on the target
system. I am the one who started this thread, and as
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:10 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Stevens wrote:
Today Kevin Dupuy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I'm reading right now, I'm presuming either you have no
documents, or they are all on your desktop. If you actually did work,
you would love Beagle. I
On Thursday 20 December 2007 08:57:50 pm Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
OK, here's the issue: you're not most people. I'm not most people. All
of us subscribed to this mailing list are probably not most people. And
most people don't name their files orderly, and put them in
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:57:50 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Catering to idiots only encourages them to continue
their idiotic behavior.
By fully quoting the mail just to add that comment you're joining the
club.
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 10:30, Rajko M. wrote:
Catering to idiots only encourages them to continue
their idiotic behavior.
Insulting 90% of people doesn't help to make your case.
You have to understand that not everyone has the same goals in life as
you, and also that different
On Saturday 22 December 2007 18:06:37 Stevens wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 10:30, Rajko M. wrote:
Catering to idiots only encourages them to continue
their idiotic behavior.
Insulting 90% of people doesn't help to make your case.
You have to understand that not everyone has
On Saturday 22 December 2007 09:13, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 18:06:37 Stevens wrote:
On Saturday 22 December 2007 10:30, Rajko M. wrote:
Catering to idiots only encourages them to continue
their idiotic behavior.
Insulting 90% of people doesn't help to
Gary Baribault wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Notwithstanding the fact that Beagle created performance issues
on your
system, have you considered converting from MBox to Maildir
format for
your mail? This will increase performance both in terms
Rajko M. wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 08:57:50 pm Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Kevin Dupuy wrote:
OK, here's the issue: you're not most people. I'm not most people. All
of us subscribed to this mailing list are probably not most people. And
most people don't name their files orderly, and
On Friday 21 December 2007 10:28:01 am Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I just don't understand why it works so bad on such a good computer
and an average data load.
Simple, Gary.
It's poorly designed and/or written, because it's
behavior while executing is very careless, and consumes
resources far
Rajko M. wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 10:28:01 am Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I just don't understand why it works so bad on such a good computer
and an average data load.
Simple, Gary.
It's poorly designed and/or written, because it's
behavior while executing is very careless, and consumes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-21 at 11:31 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
mailbox format is not really accessible through mozilla APIs). This is
one reason the thunderbird backend is packaged separately, so a quick
thing for Gary to try is to rpm -e
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
