Not mine, with a BIN of US$350
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1225975245
Cheers,
Rob Studdert (eBay ID: distudio)
PO Box 701
HURSTVILLE BC NSW 1481
AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check my current eBay
Peter Smith wrote:
Experienced astronauts talked about "seeing" radiation flashes probably caused by
particles passing across the retina (or maybe through the brain).
Put a whole new light (sorry) on the "moon photos were faked
in." conspiracy theories. Ten days in space with no
Takehiko Ueda writes:
Monitor: 2' colour LCD
Wow, that's a very big screen for a supposedly portable device :)
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
"Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock him up,
while children are
Anybody understand how the AF 1.7 adapter works?
Frank
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I see that the (F)A* 300 f2.5 works with both the L and S converters.
Is there any difference in performance?
I really would like the combi with the S converters because I could
use these on my other lenses aswell. However, I don't want to loose
performance on the 300.
Frank
-
This message is
Hi everyone,
My dad says he is looking at a Minolta X500 about 20
years old with Sigma 30-70. He didn't tell me how much
or anything more about the lens. I think he should buy
Pentax, but oh well. He is trying to find an LX for
me, and has already found me a Tamron P-KA adaptall
for my MZ-30, so
On 29 Mar 2001, at 12:01, Frank Wajer wrote:
Anybody understand how the AF 1.7 adapter works?
Hi Frank,
The AF 1.7 TC provides AF by coupling its TC elements to a helicoid which
is driven by the AF shaft out of the camera body, ie the elements of the TC
move in and out to provide system
Look what I found.
Quoted from
http://www.photographystore.com/Pages/camrabg.html
"Pentax, Minolta and Olympus. I would lump all of
these manufactures together. They are not really built
to the same quality as Canon and Nikon. If you choose
prime, fixed focal length lenses though they are
I'd love the FA* 300mm f/2.8 telephoto lens! BUT, I've got to be
somewhat realistic about my lens budget. Alright, my lens addiction!
So, does anyone out there own the FA* 300mm f/4.5 ED (IF) telephoto lens?
What are your thoughts on this lens? I'm not interested in test
These on UK ebay
24mm Lens hood
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1225293195
S accessory meter
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1225273974
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Frank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) asks:
Anybody understand how the AF 1.7 adapter works?
You put any K or A series lens on the adapter and set the lens at infinity.
Put the adapter on your autofocus camera.
The adapter mechanically moves a small internal lens in/out to get focus.
It uses the
Thursday, March 29, 2001, 2:01:51 PM
Hi everybody,
It's about ScanJet 7400c; it just arrived in the office and it'll be
available to me for a while so I prepare a test run.
What's so special about it? Well, the 2400 *optical* resolution for
transparencies, the ability to scan films up to
It was destined to be a popular item. You should have exercised the BIN
option if you wanted it.
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So here is my dilemma for you. I saw this just before I left work.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1225858889
It was a KX motordrive with
Monitor: 2' colour LCD
Wow, that's a very big screen for a supposedly portable device :)
Perhaps it folds out.
James Brooks :)
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated
Hi Mark,
Great pics. I'm no expert, but I do have a few thoughts on what I saw. I
think the odd bokeh on the shot of the cardinal is actually lens flare.
Ditto on the Blue Heron (who I recognize :-). The overly detailed bokeh
on the grass shots look like it might just be the result of a fairly
This girl likes Pentax too. And what's more, I have
the intelligence to use the manual settings. Pretty
good for a girl, eh?
Well, this girl likes Pentax. And I won't even
consider looking at any
other brands (unless they are compatible with
Pentax, but even then it would
have to be a
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other members, thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started this
way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly in
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak, K,
In this month's issue of Pop Photo Herb Keppler calls the new MZ-S Pentax's
flagship SLR. Would he say that without knowledge that there will be no
higher end model? My money is on an updated version of the MZ-3/5n being
the only other new offering coming up.
DG
-
This message is from the
Well since you say it has the front lens cap!
They go on eBay anywhere from $8 to $100 with reality (IMHO) being somewhere
around $30-$50 (in condition you described).
You're right, they are sweet.
Paul M. Provencher
(ppro)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Petit,
You have it right. The term cross processing usually refers to the development of
transparency film in C-41 negative chemistry. The result is an unusual pallete, where
red moves toward yellow, green toward red, and other interesting color switches. I
don't usually like the result for
"Pentax, Minolta and Olympus. I would lump all ofthese manufactures
together. They are not really builtto the same quality as Canon and Nikon. If
you chooseprime, fixed focal length lenses though they arecapable of superb
results. Remember I am looking forequipment capable of the absolute best
I would of bought that camera for $90... but I was too late getting to the
auction. Rats.
Todd
At 11:13 PM 3/28/01 EST, you wrote:
So here is my dilemma for you. I saw this just before I left work.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1225858889
It was a KX motordrive with
Alex, I've had the 300mm f4.5 FA lens for several years now and use it a lot
by itself and with a Pentax 1.4 XS convertor. I have had absoluely no
problems with it and am very happy with the results I get. It produces sharp
images (I mostly shoot it from a tripod) and has a robust feel to it. Yes
If I was Pentax (which I am not), I wold be doing the following:
MZ5n/MZ3 replacement with control layout/body styling of MZ-7, and new
autofocus (Safox VII). The 5 3 are a bit dated in style and do not
fit the current MZ lineup very well. I know the marketing people
currelt call this
I would like to use my existing FA 50mm f/1.4 instead
of buying a "portrait lens". Any suggestions for a
good teleconvertor? Would any filter help to create a
better portrait?
Thanks,
Kelvin
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Free email you can
E6 processed in C41 doesn't get reversed, so it's a negative image .
-- http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! --
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1225425890
-- http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! --
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
LXcentric ? :)
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to think of a one-word name meaning "LX
zealot"...LXealot?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
-
This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) asks:
Anybody understand how the AF 1.7 adapter works?
You put any K or A series lens on the adapter and set the lens at infinity.
Not quite - the AF adapter only provides a limited focussing range.
You need to rough-focus your lens to
LXpert?
LXicographer?
LXtremist?
I like LXpot. (as in sex-pot).
I need to get me one o' dem dere LX's.
tv
herbet brasileiro wrote:
LXcentric ? :)
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to think of a one-word name meaning "LX
zealot"...LXealot?
Local shop that has used gear has a Pentax 30mm/2.8
Sorry, dont remember if K/M/A
though I haven't looked at Boz's to see how many versions
exist
$150 was price
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
mike wilson wrote:
Put a whole new light (sorry) on the "moon photos were faked
in." conspiracy theories. Ten days in space with no
(effective) protection should have _some_ effect on film,
shouldn't it?
Yes, it should. But the film wasn't ten days in space with no
effective
Dick wrote:
In this month's issue of Pop Photo Herb Keppler calls the new MZ-S Pentax's
flagship SLR. Would he say that without knowledge that there will be no
higher end model? My money is on an updated version of the MZ-3/5n being
the only other new offering coming up.
Weird logic.
Hi,
if you use a 2X converter you will essentially be using a f/2.8 lens;
if you then put a filter on it you may also reduce the light
transmission by 1/2 a stop or more. This will reduce your ability to
use very shallow depth of field, it will make the viewfinder darker
and so make critical
Minolta X-500 is the European name for the X-570. You can
find a lot of info about it (X-570) from the Minolta User's
Group site:
http://www.hempac.net/mug/x-570.html
Regards,
___
Tonghang Zhou (Zhou is pronounced like Joe)
Anyone got a trashed AF body that I can buy a part off of?
Collin
***
Data Processing Consultation, Inc.
Providing Broad-Spectrum Business Solutions and Assistance
http://www.iol21.com/dpconsult
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, David P. Chernicoff wrote:
LXian
LXite
:)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
At 08:49 AM 3/29/2001 -0800, you wrote:
LXcentric ? :)
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to think of a one-word name meaning "LX
zealot"...LXealot?
LXian
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Tiger Moses wrote:
Local shop that has used gear has a Pentax 30mm/2.8
Sorry, dont remember if K/M/A
though I haven't looked at Boz's to see how many versions
exist
$150 was price
Not bad. They seem have gone for $250 and up on eBay lately.
chris
-
This
Keep in mind that the US Government has flown film in space for years. Photography from
spy satellites was exclusively film based for years. The satellites employed detachable
reentry vehicles for the film which were snatched in mid air over the pacific by C-130s
snagging their chutes. The last
Tanya Mayer wrote:
He has what he calls "Video Pentax K Mount Lens Adaptor"
Would be most grateful if anybody could shed some light on
this
Thanks,
Tanya.
Hi Tanya,
Typically, video lenses have a C-mount, which is 1" diameter by 32
thread-per-inch thread pitch. If the base of this
Is it just my eyes, or do other people find that it's almost impossible to
see the LEDs in the viewfinder of a ZX-5n when shooting outdoors in bright
light? Most of the time I end up guessing what it says. Do I need a black
cloth over my head like a view-camera photographer? Or are my batteries
The resulting 100mm f/2.8 is a good portrait length. You could use
soft-focus filters to create softness around the edges - this would be one
of many effects available to you through the use of filters. There are lots
of options depending on the mood you wish to portray with the image.
I have the same problem I think it is just dumb engineering
What I do, sometimes, is press ML button and put my hand in front
of the lens, than I can see the LCD in the viewfinder (it is also
a dumb solution, but...)
Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it just my eyes, or do other
I couldn't agree with you more, Pal. The flagship designation for the MZ-S
will probably last no more than 2-5 years, depending on how much pressure
digital sales put on film cameras and other factors.
DG
At 07:34 PM 3/29/01 +0200, you wrote:
Dick wrote:
In this month's issue of Pop
The 1.7/50 M lens I tested some time ago and found out that the 3.5/35-105 SMC-A is
slightly sharper and the 4/28-70 FA slightly less sharp at 50 mm at comparable
apertures.
Now when I compared the new 24-90 to these two zooms I found out that at the close
focusing distances the new lens is
Id expect that at full aperture you could throw everything out of focus and did not
need any extra softness around the edges.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperinen viesti-
Lhettj: Provencher, Paul M. [EMAIL
X - A scroll of news from
Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Read it? [yn] y
Thursday, March 29, 2001, 2:01:51 PM
Hi everybody,
[About the HP ScanJet 7400C]
I looked up the specs and it looks really good. W.r.t. transparencies
it seems almost up to par with some film scanners.
More
I suupose I should enter a vote for the A 50mm F1.4 (after much debating
inside my head :)
Todd
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Oops! Replied to the list. Sorry!
Todd
At 01:56 PM 3/29/01 -0600, you wrote:
[snip]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Raimo says
Id expect that at full aperture you could throw everything out of focus
and did not need any extra softness around the edges.
It's a matter of personal preference and desired effectone of several
options available to the photographer.
Paul M. Provencher
(ppro)
-Original
Pl Jensen asked what I meant by my way of describing the FA*400/5.6
Pl, my only true point of reference is the M-400/5.6, and it is certainly
better than that in all respects but handling.
On the optical side I don't know if my comments are worth anything to you,
but IMO, the FA*400 is good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alan.
just a quick query. Are you interested in selling the LX Winder battery
holder directly, or would you prefer to let it run its course on Ebay?
Thanks in advance,
Terry
At 18:11 28/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
Just to let you guys know
Dear All,
I would like to buy 28-70mm zoom lens for my Pentax P30 that I bought very
recently. I would also like to have an operating manual. Can I get one to
download from the net?
with regards,
Teklehaimanot.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Some of us think the control layout of the 5/5n/3 is the best
thing about them. It is the only AF camera with a traditional
control layout. So you think Pentax should toss them and the
unique segment of the market and make another me to camera? I
think at least some of us hope not, we want an
--
From: "Ray Ambrosi" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:48:18 +0900
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?)
Hi Cameron
I've been following the list for about 2 years and am a long-term pentax fan
in Canada. Starting in 99 I waited for the
New puppy for my lens collection!
I bought a SMC K 17 f4 Fisheye in 9,5 condition. The lens is smooth and very
compact. I liked the feel of aperture ring. I think K series have the best
quality in this issue.
I bought it to a Pro who uses Pentax. Yes, he is pro, he is VERY succesfull and
he
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, petit miam wrote:
Quoted from
http://www.photographystore.com/Pages/camrabg.html
"Pentax, Minolta and Olympus. I would lump all of
these manufactures together. They are not really built
to the same quality as Canon and Nikon. If you choose
prime, fixed focal length
Ray wrote:
I wanted a better-sealed tough camera from Pentax I too was disappointed at
the MZ-S specs, it doesn't have focus-aid light, low fps, and no aperature
wheel. So again I will wait to see if a new body is indeed released.
The problem is that it might never be released. I'm sure
I don't normally forward astronomy items. However, a number of members
have expressed interest in photographing auroral displays. This notice
predicts strong auroral activity over the weekend.
Hope this advance notice will help you prepare for the weekend!
Alexander Grigolia
Same thing with the ZX-M. Viewfinder LED's just disappear in bright light.
Damn dumb engineering is right!
Skip
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandre A. P. Suaide" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Can't see the LEDs in Bright
Is it just my eyes, or do other people find that it's almost impossible to
see the LEDs in the viewfinder of a ZX-5n when shooting outdoors in bright
light? Most of the time I end up guessing what it says. Do I need a black
cloth over my head like a view-camera photographer? Or are my
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Russell Mayer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone please enlighten me as to what a "FG grip" is? Thanks to
all
of you "in the know". :-)
Tanya.
Hi Tanya
The FG Grip is an accessory (most say overpriced) that attaches to the Z-1p
via the tripod
Which autofocus in general would be considered better? The no-servo,
predictive kind found in the PZ-20, or the continuous/servo, no-predictive
type, as found in the SF1 cameras?
And yes I do know that one can get both options, together, in the PZ-1
cameras, but the PZ-1(p?) is a treat I'm
Juan J. Buhler wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FA 35 2 (1)
Am I the only one who likes this lens? Come on, guys!
It was a tough call, Juan. I love the FA 35/2 AL (and my other lenses), but
in the end I figured the only way to chose fairly was to pick the one with
the most
I am doing a few portraits next weekend
and decided to use a softener for a few
of the shots.
Is there a distributor in Australia that
stocks this. I have tried several outlets
put have been told "we can get them in for
you some time in 2/3/4 weeks.
Apparently they need to bulk order and my
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dan Scott wrote:
and soon, hopefully, the fifth: an M 135/3.5).
This is an excellent little lens. Probably by far not the best 135
Pentax made, but it is really compact and feels great on a ZX or M
series camera. It's my main tele currently, nice for this kind of
shots:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
See the real problem is that we only get to pick one. So, do you pick the
one that you use all the time or one that you really like? I'm still torn.
I can narrow it to about 4 or 5 lenses.
Same problem. Haven't decided yet which lens to put as my favorite lens,
I've taken the liberty of changing the name of this thread. I agree with
Bill, it doesn't have to be Kensington. (Although Mr. Sawyer does know
how to find those tame deer in the Kensington woods.) Urban, rural, it's
all okay by me. I wouldn't mind heading out towards Mark's neck of the
woods
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not quite - the AF adapter only provides a limited focussing range.
You need to rough-focus your lens to the approximate distance, and
let the AF adapter make minor focussing adjustments.
Sorry John, what I usual do is set it at infinity and see what happens. Of
Even though I have several AF lenses and a host of K, M, and KA's, my
favorite is my 75-150/4 SMC-M.
Ed M.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
I have a little MZ30 that i would like
add this lense on.
http://www.crkennedy.com.au/sigma/headings/lenses/50-500/50-500.html
Is there anywhere in .au where you can test one of these?
Has anyone puchased one?
Kind regards
Kevin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
You don't need the holder. Just stretch it over the lens and hold it with a
rubber band.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: Cokin soft filter in
From: Kevin
Subject: Cokin soft filter in Australia
I am doing a few portraits next weekend
and decided to use a softener for a few
of the shots.
Is there a distributor in Australia that
stocks this. I have tried several outlets
put have been told "we can get them in for
you some time
To start off the subject line of this is a typo - I meant to say that this
lens was a 28-90mm not a 28-80mm
Bernd, thankyou so much for your advice, I just wanted to check that what
you have said applies to the 28-90mm Macro, and not a similar 28-80mm as I
just realised that I made a typing
I haven't yet had occasion to try this myself, but I've heard of numerous
techniques that can provide good results without having to resort to buying
an expensive specialty filter. One involves a thin coat of vaseline on a
skylight filter (leaving a clear spot somewhere so you can have the
Juan J. Buhler wrote:
This is an excellent little lens. Probably by far not the best 135
Pentax made, but it is really compact and feels great on a ZX or M
series camera. It's my main tele currently, nice for this kind of
shots:
http://www.crosswinds.net/~jbuhler/html/5/ar00-0018_hi.html
Hi Bob
My question: If you set it to infininity and the adapter cannot make the
fine adjustment, can you focus on the fly or do you have to dismount the
lens and set the approx. distance as John noted?
Don
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Note: Tiffen provides various softening filters. Several of them are
essentially nylon netting (stocking?) sandwiched between two plates of
glass. I have two. One is black netting, the other is (sort of) gold
netting.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Treena Harp" [EMAIL
Further to this, here is the shops answer:
The lens is a
TAMRON SPECIAL PERFORMANCE
35-105MM F2.8 LENS
So your right Paul I had the wrong zoom length.
I'll look up your URL below and see what the performance
is like.but then again my eyes aren't what they used to be
and I do like auto
I am doing a few portraits next weekend
and decided to use a softener for a few
of the shots.
Is there a distributor in Australia that
stocks this. I have tried several outlets
put have been told "we can get them in for
you some time in 2/3/4 weeks.
Apparently they need to bulk order and my
FWIW I have tried them all... vaseline on a UV filter, black and white
tulle jobs stretched over cardboard and stuck with glue, 3 different Cokin
diffusers, and one Jessop's and was disappointed with the lot.
But it all depends on how fussy you are I guess. I did have a lot
of fun making the
I have never had this problem with the ZX-M. I don't know why the ZX-5n is
different.
Todd
At 08:59 PM 3/29/01 -0500, you wrote:
Hi John,
You wrote:
Is it just my eyes, or do other people find that it's almost impossible to
see the LEDs in the viewfinder of a ZX-5n when shooting outdoors in
Dan,
I think you will come to love this lens. I have one and it's one of my
favorite lenes. I won't go out shooting
without it.
Later,
Gary
I'm ready. :-)
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Further to this, here is the shops answer:
The lens is a
TAMRON SPECIAL PERFORMANCE
35-105MM F2.8 LENS
So your right Paul I had the wrong zoom length.
I'll look up your URL below and see what the performance
is like.but then again my eyes aren't what they used to be
and I do like auto
Remember that KX Motor Drive that sold for a BIN of $90? Well, the seller
just put it up for sale again, this time with a BIN of $199. What gives?
I wonder if they found out how rare it was and decided to back out of the
sale. The buyer has a feedback rating of 753, so I'm sure they
Hi,
I have another problem when looking through 5n, if my eye is not dead in the
centre i get a distortion at the top and bottom of what i am focusing on,
more so at the bottom... its very annoying and i have never had the problem
with my SuperA, LX, Spotmatic, Me Super.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Trade it for another LX.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Jones" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 8:25 PM
Subject: RE: Distortion? was: Can't see the LEDs in Bright Light (ZX-5n)
Hi,
I have another
Alan Chan wrote:
In Melbourne, Ted's Camera should carry Cokin (upstairs). My favour is Cokin
083.
I am in Port Macquarie NSW
Do you have a phone/URL?
kind regards
kevin
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
You haven't? You must have some special ZX-M then. I have the "M" (and I
like it too), but on a bright sunny day my viewfinder's LEDs all but
disappear...
Skip
I have never had this problem with the ZX-M. I don't know why the ZX-5n
is
different.
Todd
At 08:59 PM 3/29/01 -0500, you
Hi guys,
I had a little fun taking pictures at my girlfriend's graduation today
(postgraduate diploma in laboratory technology). I broke-in my new 43mm
Limited on my K2 body and I still love that lens. I'm keen to see how the
"dark" photos I took with that and the 15mm, shutter speeds in
Except they are two different serial numbers. Don't know why two different
BIN prices though.
jm
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, March 29, 2001 8:30 PM
Subject: EB: weird KX auction
Remember that KX
I am in Port Macquarie NSW
Do you have a phone/URL?
kind regards
kevin
Try http://www.teds.com.au/.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from
Good spotting. I assume s/he meant 2". 2' is bigger
than my TV at home.
Takehiko Ueda writes:
Monitor: 2' colour LCD
Wow, that's a very big screen for a supposedly
portable device :)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with
95 matches
Mail list logo
