The FA* 24/2 may be the most popular lens, but 50mm, with17 votes, and
100mm, with 12 votes, appear to be the most popular prime focal lengths
(Pentax primes, anyway).
17 votes: 50mm
12 votes: 100mm
10 votes: 24mm
08 votes: 85mm
06 votes: 200mm
05 votes: 28mm
04 votes: 40mm
04 votes: 30
That makes me feel better, as I've given out a bunch of RC prints in the
last year or 2...luckily they were all toned.
BTW, how did Ctein test?
tv
William Johnson wrote:
>
> I have the first half of the article in front of me
> (not sure if I ever read the second part) but he does
> state that
I believe the site is down!
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:58 PM
Subject: May PUG
> The May 2001 issue of the Pentax Users Gallery is now available
> for your viewing pleasure at htt
- Original Message -
From: "William Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 30, 2001 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: RC Paper problems. Was: Re: C41 B&W
> I have the first half of the article in front of me
> (not sure if I ever read the second part) but h
>I had no problem loading it earlier in the evening, but it ain't working
>for me now, either.
>
>regards,
>frank
Me too. I actually made it through the first row before having problems
getting through. What I've seen so far is great, however. Hope the problem
is temporary.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PRO
H. It was working before supper. This is most unhandy.
Anyway, it is a great gallery, chock full of wonderful pictures.
But at the moment, our host is not working.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the d
Our family was very poor. We were NYC dirt farmers, which meant
that we first had to collect enough dirt in order to farm. Every
morning my mom and dad would leave the city and walk and hitchhike
to the suburbs where they'd go around to homes and do odd jobs to
earn enough dirt to bring home to
I have the first half of the article in front of me
(not sure if I ever read the second part) but he does
state that using either selenium toner or AGFA Sistan
seems to provide considerable protection. He also
states that AGFA paper is more susceptible to the
problem than Kodak.
I have AGFA RC p
You win-the only flood I've ever been in was in the aftermath of the afore
mentioned hurricane.
Dan Scott (trailer-trash before trailer-trash was cool)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel writes:
>Sheesh! Try a refrigerator box in a flood!
>
>
>--
>Sheldon Belinkoff
>CREATURE'S COMFORT
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Daphne wrote:
> although its a bit silly, seeing its the PUG.. perhaps I'll dig out some
> architecture pic taken with a pentax fisheye?
:^) some of my most impressive architechural shots have
been made w/ my 17mm f4 FishEye Takumar!
these are some of my favori
I had no problem loading it earlier in the evening, but it ain't working
for me now, either.
regards,
frank
Gerald Cermak wrote:
> I keep getting:
>
> "10061 - Connection refused
> Internet Security and Acceleration Server"
>
> Cheers,
> Gerald
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Scot
I keep getting:
"10061 - Connection refused
Internet Security and Acceleration Server"
Cheers,
Gerald
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: May PUG
> William,
>
> Are you having server probl
Unfortunately it doesn't load!
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:58 PM
Subject: May PUG
> The May 2001 issue of the Pentax Users Gallery is now available
> for your viewing pleasure at ht
William,
Are you having server problems? I keep getting a server not answering message.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>The May 2001 issue of the Pentax Users Gallery is now available
>for your viewing pleasure at http://pug.komkon.org
>This months gallery is on the large side, so sit back with a
Bob Blakely writes:
> Ah... I use f/1.2 quite a bit - and still trying to hand hold at 1/15th
with
> ISO 1600 film.
I find a couple of alcoholic drinks before shooting helps smooth out my
jitters enough to get 1/15 and 1/30s handheld shots sharp enough at f/1.2
that the shake is less than the l
Mark Roberts writes:
> I also must admit I liked having my old A-series lens
> autofocusing away.
If you're really smart, you can get your screw mounts lenses to autofocus
too. That just amazes most non-Pentax photographers.
> If the image quality is half way decent I'll be really happy!
The
The May 2001 issue of the Pentax Users Gallery is now available
for your viewing pleasure at http://pug.komkon.org
This months gallery is on the large side, so sit back with a
couple of your favourite refreshing beverages and enjoy the
show.
My favourite picture this month is by Jan van Wijk. I l
They also have a used Pentax 6x7 with 90mm leaf for US$450.00.
Someone should snap it up, thats a great rig to use.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Jose Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 30, 2001 5:51 PM
Subject: SMC-K Pentax 105mm f/2.8
> Hi Ev
On Monday, April 30, 2001 11:28 PM, Lasse Karlsson
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> The problem for me is to find a way of colorizing while still keeping the
> original "texture" of grain and shadows of the original surface (of the black
> and white picture), be it the wall of a house or the sk
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 30, 2001 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: RC Paper problems. Was: Re: C41 B&W
> In a message dated 4/30/2001 7:37:07 PM US Eastern Standard
Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> > I have a lot of 25 year old RC
Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just got this from KEH in "like new" condition, complete with box,
>case, papers, and caps. The lens appears (nearly) unused, but I notice
>that the front tube (filter mount) is looser than on other lenses that I
>have. Is this normal? Slides from a te
Ah... I use f/1.2 quite a bit - and still trying to hand hold at 1/15th with
ISO 1600 film.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Tonghang Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So everyone should save their money from 50mm/1.2 or any other
> fast lens, and use it to buy an LX? You get 2 stop
Way to go Peter! It sure feels good to fix your own stuff without having
to pay .
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Spiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: Fixed my battery eating Pentax MX
I just got this from KEH in "like new" condition, complete with box,
case, papers, and caps. The lens appears (nearly) unused, but I notice
that the front tube (filter mount) is looser than on other lenses that I
have. Is this normal? Slides from a test roll last weekend came back
very sharp.
Wit
A while back I e-mailed the list mentioning that I had an MX that would
completely drain the batteries after a few of days, even though the LEDs in
the viewfinder were off.
I was able to fix it with the help of the MX repair manual that a PDML
member very kindly posted at http://www.robertstec
In a message dated 4/30/2001 7:37:07 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I have a lot of 25 year old RC prints, the majority on Kodak paper, that
> are as good as the day I made them. While most of them have been stored
> in boxes, some are framed behind glass.
> Paul
I have a lot of 25 year old RC prints, the majority on Kodak paper, that
are as good as the day I made them. While most of them have been stored
in boxes, some are framed behind glass.
Paul
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "tom" <
> Subject: Re: RC Paper problems. Was
I've just spent some time (& half a roll fo film) playing with my new toy, the
1.7x teleconverter/autofocus converter and I have to say that it's really fun!
What a nifty device!
I just slapped it and an SMC-A 50/1.7 on my PZ-1p, went out in the garden and
photographed some flowers and stuff. Betw
"Creature's Comfort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sheesh! Try a refrigerator box in a flood!
Luxury. We used to *dream* of havin' a refrigerator box...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I would like to stress that this is pure speculation.
>However, Pentax is planning more upper level products.
This is good news and, actually, makes sense. They took a big gamble in
producing the Limited lenses and the amazing success of those products me
Why don't you change the topic of this thread ... it's no longer got
anything to do with Agfa APX25, or even photography.
--
Sheldon Belinkoff
CREATURE'S COMFORT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tanya & Russell Mayer wrote:
>
> "Well, you're not supposed to eat it with a spoon,
> silly. IMNSHO litt
"Well, you're
not supposed to eat it with a spoon,silly. IMNSHO little beats a scrape of
Vegemite on hotbuttered wholemeal toast. And I am not an
Aussie..."" I suggest that you leave the vegemite to the
true> Aussies unless you have depressed nasal and taste>
senses. It's a little like eat
Hi Everyone,
I praised this lens last week while discussing the SMC-M 100mm f/2.8
and I indicated it was somewhat rare. Well, the local Pro Shop currently
has one in Exc+ Condition ($200), if anybody is interested. The price
is on the high side, but this is an outstanding short telephoto lens.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: e: found my camera
>
>
> I've seen this condition referred to as Learned Helplessness.
>
> - Donald Ros
William Robb wrote:
>
> Was it behind glass as well?
I don'tthink so.
> I never did see Cteins follow up
> article about it, so I don't know what conclusions he came to in
> the long run. He was very concerned about the bronzing problem
> though.
I'm not concerned anymore, I'm sticking with f
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <
Subject: Re: RC Paper problems. Was: Re: C41 B&W
> William Robb wrote:
> >
> > Ctein didn't find improper washing to be the culprit. He
decided
> > it was casued by putting the print behind glass, or
otherwise
> > enclosing it. I have seen it on lamina
You can try:
http://www.windrivers.com/script/FrameIt.cgi?url=http://www.windrivers.com/script/search.asp?search=Creative%20Labs
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
William Robb wrote:
>
> Ctein didn't find improper washing to be the culprit. He decided
> it was casued by putting the print behind glass, or otherwise
> enclosing it. I have seen it on laminated RC prints made with
> Ilford MG III and IV paper, as well as framed prints.
> RC paper is definitely
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 30, 2001 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: RC Paper problems. Was: Re: C41 B&W
>
>
> William Robb wrote:
>
> > Aaron, did you read that article by Ctein a couple of years
back
> > about RC paper and t
I have some redundancy in my gear, so I'm making the following items
available to the PDML membership.
Prices are "you offer it first, you take it" prices. I'll entertain
other offers, or I'd be willing to make a trade for a Pentax-FA 645
75/2.8 or Pentax-A 645 55/2.8. I accept Paypal, money orde
I use f/1.2, often coupled with 1600 ISO film, and no flash, at night, in
the streets. The short dof doesn't matter much at longer distances.
- Original Message -
From: "Tonghang Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: LX's view
So everyone should save their money from 50mm/1.2 or any other
fast lens, and use it to buy an LX? You get 2 stops brighter
view from ALL your lenses. How often do you actually use
50mm at 1.2? Never? It's the brighter finder view you were
after, right?
I did my comparison with the FA-1, the
> Neat on line camera for you to try..
>
>
> http://sites.netscape.net/spzumalt2/camera1.html
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Just a quick thankyou to Tanya and everyone who offered advice with my
mailing.
I now have a fully working PC with all cards installed(including the PIA SB
Vibra16). This was the cause of all my conflicts I've experienced over the
past 1 1/2 years. I simply removed a couple of jumps at random an
I went out shooting with another Pentax owner some months ago. I
was using the LX with an SA-23 screen and an A28/2.0 lens. Raph was
using a PZ-1p and a Tokina 2.8 zoom. He was startled at how bright
the LX finder was.
--
Sheldon Belinkoff
CREATURE'S COMFORT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PR
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other members, thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started this
way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly in
you
Colin,
Creative identifies its products by the CT number on the board, not the
chip. See http://www.creativehelp.com/specs/, and then find your driver
based on that. If you are using Win98, it may have native support and
drivers for that card already, and you could try those.
Gerry
-
Alexander wrote:
>Any rumors, speculation, or pure guess work on
> what these new lenses may be or when they may be announced?
There are no (verifiable) reliable rumors about new lens series. Rumors about a new
FA*II ultrasonic lenses has surfaced in Japan on mailing lists but their reliabili
>Could some one please give me the link to the Depth of Field web page?
Craig,
Do you want just a calculator or pages explaining Depth of field? As
someone has already pointed you to a calculator I'll supply a tutorial
page.
http://www.minoxlab.com/Don_Krehbiel/mpl/dkdof.htm
Leon
http://
Hi, All!
I've just got the famous Pentax SMC 70-210 F4 zoom I've bid on eBay. It
looks good enough optically and cosmetically but has pretty stiff focusing
especially on 70mm zoom position near short range. Of course the zoom action
is little loose also ;-) Is it possible to do something (lubrica
Jody wrote:
> And I tried to
> colour my cheeks, but ended up looking like a
> showgirl, or a porcelain doll.
Well, that's all right too, as long as it's you... :)
> The lips looked weird
> too.
They really did...?
Hmm. I don't mind much... :)
Anyway, I think that's fun too, trying to color b
HEY, I'm outa that club!!!
LOL
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Daphne:
> oh, wel... guess I'l join the Lasse club then :-)
Oh Daphne, finally... after I've been waiting and hoping for soo long... :)
And since you are the very first one to apply, I hereby appoint you Lifetime Honorary
Member (LHM) of the club.
For those of you who haven't yet received infor
> -Original Message-
> From: Daphne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> although its a bit silly, seeing its the PUG.. perhaps I'll
> dig out some
> architecture pic taken with a pentax fisheye?
Architecture with fisheye? I don't think it sounds silly.
Hope you do the dig!
Jostein
-
This me
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Are we about to embark on another two year rumor parade? What's the
> "Limited camera"?
Shel, I didn't realize that the rumor parade had taken a break at some
point just over two years ago! ;)
The rumor parade never ends at PDML!
The "Limited Camera" is the obvious c
oh, wel... guess I'l join the Lasse club then :-)
although its a bit silly, seeing its the PUG.. perhaps I'll dig out some
architecture pic taken with a pentax fisheye?
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directio
William Robb wrote:
> Aaron, did you read that article by Ctein a couple of years back
> about RC paper and the bronzing problem? I am sure it was in a
> Darkroom Techniques magazine, but I can't find the issue it was
> in. I think he said the PolyMax RC paper was the only one not
> prone to th
Daphne asked:
> what was the golden rule again- theme months are for Pentax gear, open
> months are for other gear too or the other way round ?
Yes, the first alternative. It s also spelled out at the PUG site (Submission info" or
something similar).
> can't remember.. and I've got these great
I took it as a tongue-in-cheek remark, not meant to be
taken seriously. How did you take it?
> > Shel wrote.
> >
> > > It can certainly be a problem at times, and to
> attach a
> filter after
> > > preparing for the shot is the most ridiculous
> suggestion
> I've heard
> > > in ages
> >
> > >What
But I thought May was an open gallery, making it OK to
use non-Pentax, if you really feel you have to.
Jody.
--- Frank Theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Uh-oh. If you notice my submission for May, it was
> shot (about 25 years
> ago) on a Praktica, with a Soligor lens. Nary a
> Pentax pie
I had a wooden whistle, but it wooden whistle,
so I got a steel whistle, but it steel wooden whistle.
Just had to share that little ditty :)
Jody.
> Anyone know if the wooden tripod it comes with is
> any good?
> Steve Larson
> Redondo Beach, California
___
Ouch, might as well stick a paperclip in a
power-point.
> > That sounds quite conservative.
> > Some flashes have trigger voltages of 150V and up.
>
> I have one that triggers at 240V.
>
> TTYL, DougF
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the
> -Original Message-
> From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I dont understand why anyone would want a gallery
> shot only with LX bodies. The body doesnt really meam
> much IMHO. A gallery of images all shot with the same
> LENS makes much more sense to me at least
> JC
Well, you're not supposed to eat it with a spoon,
silly. IMNSHO little beats a scrape of Vegemite on hot
buttered wholemeal toast. And I am not an Aussie.
Jody.
> I suggest that you leave the vegemite to the true
> Aussies unless you have depressed nasal and taste
> senses. It's a little like e
> -Original Message-
> From: dave o'brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Actually, that sounds like a good theme for a gallery: a shot taken at
> 50mm. (You can't really say it must be at f1.4 or whatever, as not
> everyone will have a 50mm prime.)
Been there...
Look at http://pug.komkon
> WHO???
>
> > I once tried to show my LX to Bill Owens. He refused
> > even to look at it.
> >
> > Doug
Yep, I knew if I looked at one I'd want it and can't afford the lawyer's
fees for a divorce.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To uns
Recently Martin Trautmann wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I found out yesterday that my old 1.7/50 (A) is blocked -
> I can move between aperture 1.7 and 11, but not smaller and not A.
I might have interest in bying it. Please contact me off the list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) if you are interested in selli
I'm all for that. As long as we can use old photos. My
Spottie's lightmeter is currently (hopefully
temporarily) dead. Suppose I should learn to use it
without one.
Jody.
> OK, then lets do a spotmatic gallery too
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctio
A scroll of mail from Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu,
26 Apr 2001 21:40:49 -0700
Read it? y
>Tonight I'm having a wee dram of cask strength Dallas Dhu 24,
>distilled in 1970. What are you sipping this evening?
Well, I'm still looking for a decent s/h LX, but will raise a toast to
it's
That reminds me of a Photo Rally competition I did
recently. This was organised by the local photo store.
We had a whole day in which to photograph 9 topics. It
was a beautiful sunny day, and one of the topics was
"Rain". It brought some interesting photos. They had
some neat topics that could be
A scroll of mail from "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri,
27 Apr 2001 19:33:24 -0400
Read it? y
>I think I'll stick to my Knob Creek.
Boy, did I read that one wrong the first time around...
dave
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.
A scroll of mail from "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 27
Apr 2001 20:03:29 -0400
Read it? y
>I dont understand why anyone would want a gallery
>shot only with LX bodies. The body doesnt really meam
>much IMHO. A gallery of images all shot with the same
>LENS makes much more sense to
T-Max 400 has smaller grain for certain. From personal experience, I
believe it has slightly wider exposure latitude, but highlights can tend
to block up if processing is even slightly incorrect. I think Tri-X
appears sharper on modest sized enlargements due to its grain. T-Max
seems fussier about
what was the golden rule again- theme months are for Pentax gear, open
months are for other gear too or the other way round ?
can't remember.. and I've got these great architecture pics taken with
my Rollei 35...
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
There is a place in NZ you can send your film to, and
get it back scanned onto CD for less than NZ$20
(c.US$9). It's not that expensive anymore. And plenty
of computer packages you get the scanner free.
But now that I have my new scanner, I just need to get
the internet connection (still using th
WHO???
> I once tried to show my LX to Bill Owens. He refused
> even to look at it.
>
> Doug
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mai
On Mon 2001-04-30 (04:04), Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently Martin Trautmann wrote:
> >
> > what's your recommendation for those two lenses?
> >
> > http://phred.org/pentax/k/lenses/primes/40-55/FA50f1,7.html
> > http://phred.org/pentax/k/lenses/primes/40-55/FA50f1,4.html
>
> Well,
That is one hell of a deal!
Norm
Rob Studdert wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Anyone interested in a nice 67 Starter kit might want to check out this:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1234201923
>
> Not mine, and I have no connection with this seller and cannot vouch for
> them o
Thanks, I have often wondered that, but couldn't work
it out past the "C".
> Ah, and to keep things slightly on-topic: CLA means
> cleaning,
> lubrication and adjustment, for those who haven't
> picked that up off
> the list yet. :-)
>
> -tih
__
Hi,
Recently Martin Trautmann wrote:
>
> what's your recommendation for those two lenses?
>
> http://phred.org/pentax/k/lenses/primes/40-55/FA50f1,7.html
> http://phred.org/pentax/k/lenses/primes/40-55/FA50f1,4.html
Well, if you were closer to Hamburg you could try out both... There is an
F5
I just set my new computer up last night. It came with
a scanner and Adobe Photoshop, so I spent last night
playing, having never used a scanner before.
I had a set of photo stickers of me from my visit to
Melbourne. I went into one of those booths where you
stick money in the slot, for the novel
My sentiments exactly (except for the last paragraph)
> For me, it's the fact that they were offered in a
> public auction format and
> for such an exorbitant price.
>
> It has a BLATANT APPEARANCE of trying to profit in a
> big way from the death
> of another. It's not like he had the only pic
Hi all,
what's your recommendation for those two lenses?
http://phred.org/pentax/k/lenses/primes/40-55/FA50f1,7.html
http://phred.org/pentax/k/lenses/primes/40-55/FA50f1,4.html
I'm surprised how expensive the 1.7 is - it costs about 350 DM in Germany
(that's about US$ 160), while other lenses
Burn your current lens, and it will (hopefully) rise
out of the ashes :)
> Maybe a phoenix would do the trick.
>
> How do you find the phoenix? does it go to 1:1? and
> how much are they
> worth?>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the thin
On 29 Apr 2001 00:41:03 +0200, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
>
>> May I suggest that other LX owners get these new screens while you
>> can.
>
>I'll second that. I played around with my K24/2.8 and K85/1.8 before
>and after replacing the SC-21 with an SC-69, and the difference was
>very pleasant. I
85 matches
Mail list logo
