>I´d say that you exaggerate a bit. I have looked through its viewfinder -
>admittedly it was long ago - but it looked OK. And it did get very positive
>reviews when it was introduced. I haven´t seen the Nikon, though.
I thought I could live with it, but after 1.5 years, I just gave it up and
Shel...
This link explains the adjustment of a movie camera lens...but it is of
course the same basic principle as applied to all collimating:
http://lavender.fortunecity.com/lavender/569/lenscollimation.html
Don't know if it helps or not...
I don't believe collimation is really much of an is
I´d say that you exaggerate a bit. I have looked through its viewfinder - admittedly
it was long ago - but it looked OK. And it did get very positive reviews when it was
introduced. I haven´t seen the Nikon, though.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/pri
I was thinking that I'd like to be sure some of my cameras are well
within tolerance. What exactly has to be checked or adjusted:
Parallelism of mount to film plane;
Mirror alignment;
Focusing screen alignment;
Film plane to mount distance;
Shutter
How do these things work?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Howdy, folks,
In my search (and procrastination) for a scanner, I was reading this
review a few minutes ago:
http://www.hively.com/canoscan/
Just in the first paragraph of the section "Jumping right in to the
scan quality from negatives", he makes the following comment:
> When it comes to scan
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:09:43PM -0800, harald_nancy wrote:
> The rep. said it was better to buy the Pentax ext. warranty than
> the Mack warranty, because Pentax service centers recalibrate
> the MZ-S with computer software when serviced.
pretty pointless statement by itself.
-
This message is
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Treena Harp wrote:
> BTW, has anyone here used the Portra chromogenic B+W yet? I was wanting to
> try some for portraits, but was wondering if any of ya'll have any feedback
> on it.
I ran a test on some the other week - exposed the same scene from ISO 25
to ISO 1600. Ther
Thanks Paul, JCO... any comments on optical quality?Is is at least
pretty good wide open?
Thanks,
William in Utah.
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Ewins
> > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 20
In a message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2002 5:41:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, Mark Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *The mirror lock-up trick works on the MX, and the KM/KX/K1000
Why should you need a "trick" to lock the mirror up on a KX? It has a control
specifically designed to do that.
-
Th
I have a vivitar 283 complete with PC cord and manual that's in KEH "LN-" condition.
The first $50.00 plus $5.00 shipping gets it.
Please reply OFF-LIST to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if interested and I'll email you a pic if
needed.
Thanks!
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
In a message dated 2/23/2002 10:37:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I would draw you a diagram that even a dumb Canuck could understand, but I
> can't draw.
> Here are a couple of piccies instead.
> http://members.rogers.com/wbeard11/strap.html
>
> I presume this is th
On 23 Feb 2002 at 23:32, Fred wrote:
> > Shel,
>
> > [The FA* 24/2] is truly another great star (*) lens from Pentax.
>
> > And with the focusing clutch to disengage the autofocus mechanism,
> > there is no whir or anything. Hard core manual focus guys like you
> > and Fred would probably eve
One of your tele's looks more like a 2X or 3 extension tubes
ppro
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jmadams
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SMC Takumar 1:1.8/55
>
>
>
> I have jus
Huh? That seems like some sort of anomaly - high contrast with no
shadows in heavy overcast. Beam me up, Scotty!
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
> It's a VERY high contrast scene
[...]
> As for "shadow details" there WASNT any shadows,
> it was taken in heavy overcast.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto
Hi Dave,
The readings match. The dome gives you an 18% reading. That is the advantage
of the incident meter it measures the light not the reflectance of the
subject.
Or to put it another way the incident meter gives you a Zone V reading and
you don't have to do anything to figure that out. Then
Thanks Brendan.I was expecting a stop or atop
and a half but not 2-3 between the camera and
Minolta.Do you use yours in reflective mode at
all.Would that get closer to the incamera
meters??
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:35:19 EST
To:
I generally look to B&H first, but I've mail ordered
from Adorama several times and know of someone
else who has done so often. Adorama has been
reputable in my experience. When one shipment
was lost [apparently somewhere in Ohio -- I'm in NJ
right across the river from Adorama!], my credit
ed...
Me too...
I haven't yet seen the need to rate the 160 any slower. However, if shooting
someone with a darker complextion rating it at 100 would be a good idea. This
would only yield about 2/3 of a stop over exposure...should be just enough.
Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pen
I recently shot a roll of Portra 160VC in my Yashica 124G, metered with a
Minolta IIIF. Colors neutral but saturated when scanned at 1200 dpi on an
Epson Perfection 1200.
Bill
> I've been using Portra 160NC lately, and found the color to very, very
> neutral. My negative scans are also excelle
Dave,
I have the same meter.
First off, forget all about comparing readings with an in-camera meter since
there is really no 1:1 corespondence between ambient measurements and in
camera meters.
I have the same meter and the way I use it is to use the lumisphere (dome)
and take two readings.
All the Kodak 160 speed pro color films seem to work better at 100-125.
Paper and chemistry is easier calibrated to work with the same manufactures
film, but if the lab is sharp it should not be a major problem.
Ciao,
Graywolf
---
I've been using Portra 160NC lately, and found the color to very, very
neutral. My negative scans are also excellent with this film, so maybe
my scanner is also matched to Kodak? . It just seems like a great
film to me, and exposure has been terrific at the rated 160.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightand
Well i did it today.Bought a Used Minolta IV F
to use with the Yashica Mat.I did a test with
it and the meter ina Spotty and now i'm
confused.I took a reading in my drive way which
gave me a reading of F 8 at ISO 400 1/1000
shutter.I then took a reflective reading on the
garage door which gav
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, T Rittenhouse wrote:
> Why would you be afraid of damaging the flash attachment? I use mine. There
Its more of a fear of damaging the camera itself, really.
> may be a problem of 50 years corrosion in the flash contacts. It is
> something of a Chinese puzzle but you can tak
The list of worldwide Pentax repair shops continues to grow, although
slowly. There are now listings for Australia, Canada, France, Finland,
Norway, United Kingdom, Russia, The Netherlands, Canada, and the USA.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed.
The list has now been linked to by several w
It's a VERY high contrast scene which probably
should have been printed on grade 2 instead of
2.5 which I used. I was only trying to demonstate
the tight grain pattern of the film/processing
and the resulting sharpness of the film. It was
only a quick grab shot in my back yard, not
an exquisite pr
The recent Nikon announcement of a 70-200 f/2.8
AF-S/VR "G" lens makes me furious. No more apeture
ring! How can they do that. Nikon is going backwards
technologically. What a shame.
I am switching to Pentax which is not going backwards.
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Provia 400F is astounding. And very expensive.
later Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Fuji Provia 400F is indeed amazing. I read a report on it ...
Thank you guys. Got to try that, sooner or later.
Ciao, Flavio
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
> This cable A stuff has me confused. I've
> used a standard mechanical plunger successfully
> with my Supers for quite as while; the shutter
> button has the standard thread and the plunger
> certainly trips the shutter. How would a
> specialized electronic cable even work?
Lon,
There is a ni
whatever...
I've always had very good luck with the portra films...I've never seen wierd
colors or felt the iso rating should be altered (never used the 800 speed
film, however)...
Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net an
> Do you know what differentiates the two series?
> K lenses always seemed larger and had different
> fascia rings?
Peter,
I have a number of K series lenses and they seem to be bigger than the M series. I
believe the M's are minature to go with the intro of the MX and ME, very minature
camer
tom wrote:
>
> ...
>
> For some reason the thought of a Roman LX makes me giddy.
>
> ...
Actually "PENTAX" is a latin word (joking ;-) ).
Maybe they were already waiting for the new pro one...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
>Yeah - but MZ-M get´s the same things done.
Certainly not. A manual focus camera without a sharp viewfinder is no camera
at all. It's an insult.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.
>Nikon FM3A Metal body feels real nice in the hands. MZ/ZX-M plastic body
>feels like
>err plastic. Price $600.00 US vs $160.00 US I would assume that there is
>some difference in quality.
But the major failure of the MZ/ZX-M is the shitty viewfinder. Afterall,
what's the point to focus manual
James,
It often pays to be less specific. Next time, try leaving out Takumar or
SMC; in fact, leave out both, or at least authorize EBay to search within
the text. Remember, the seller has only 45 letters to play with so he may
omit parts of a long name to make room for key words like "minty."
On 24 Feb 2002 at 0:15, Flavio Minelli wrote:
>
> LX in good conditions, it has the ISO dial going to 3200 (should
> identify it as a newer version, I believe). I tested it over the
> counter of a small repair shop here in Roma.
For some reason the thought of a Roman LX makes me giddy.
tv
-
Thi
Absolutely not!
>Does the MX self timer pre-fire the mirror before the exposure?
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
-
This message is fr
>Unfortunately my MX is about 20 years old. The FM3a is being made today.
Time to modify the FM3a into KA mount.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
-
This messag
What a coincidence: It was two days ago that I acquired my KX, which had
the same strap. My strap is narrow dark-gray cloth webbing with a broader
black Pentax shoulder pad. Once you open the hinge, push the webbing here
and you'll eventually figure out which part of it to push to create slack
The B&H photo shows a long plunger-looking doohickey, like the adapter that
you might use to inflate a basketball with a tire pump. I assume it makes
electrical contact with a switch, maybe a solenoid.
If it worked, wouldn't an electronic release shave a couple tenths of a
second off response
Hi all,
I have access to the following equipment, if someone is interested
please contact me off list.
LX in good conditions, it has the ISO dial going to 3200 (should
identify it as a newer version, I believe). I tested it over the counter
of a small repair shop here in Roma. It comes with a wai
Shel,
I really stepped in it that time, didn't I? ( Drag Foot, Drag Foot. )
I painted with too broad a brush, not all the M's are bad. ( Maybe
just the 28/2.8? ) Certainly the 50/1.4M's that I have used and
still use were / are plenty good enough. But one 50/1.4A that I had
the chance to u
How do you disassemble a Pentax Spotmeter V the switch
I pull to take a reading is intermittent and I want to clean the
contacts. The only visible screws are the two screws on the metal plate
at the bottom next to the battery compartment, when you remove these
you still can't remove the plate. I a
How do you disassemble a Pentax Spotmeter V the switch
I pull to take a reading is intermittent and I want to clean the
contacts. The only visible screws are the two screws on the metal plate
at the bottom next to the battery compartment, when you remove these
you still can't remove the plate. I a
---Original Message---
> I was following the news of the new Pentax body with interest and was
struck
> with an notion that Pentax seems to be updating their entire 35mm SLR.
> lineup. If that is the case, we can most likely expect to see an update to
> ZX-5N/3N cameras sometime late this
Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does the MX self timer pre-fire the mirror before the exposure?
Nope. But you can do the mirror lock-up trick* and then use the self-timer to
take the shot. This is how I usually do it becaus I often don't have a cable
release handy.
*The mirror lock-up trick
Of course, I meant "pull" processing, not push. Sorry.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Yes, you're more or less correct in that. Kodak suggests times similar
> to what JCO is using for small tanks with intermittent agitation,
> although those times are for standard processing, not "push"
> processin
Yes, you're more or less correct in that. Kodak suggests times similar
to what JCO is using for small tanks with intermittent agitation,
although those times are for standard processing, not "push"
processing. IIRC, Kodak suggests about 25% - 30% less time when pushing
one stop, which is about w
Hi,
I've just read the thread about the new MZ body - I'm a little late, I know,
but I was gone for a week of vacation at the seaside:)
So here comes another one... It definitely seems like some general change of
MZ generations.
The info about the camera ( http://digilander.iol.it/aohc/pressreleas
Does the MX self timer pre-fire the mirror before the exposure?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Use
Paul,
The 135/3.5K is a very fine lens. I've got some moonrise shots,
taken with mine, that I need to get developed. If I'm right they
will be nice.
Looks to me like some of the M lenses made too many compromises in
order to achieve their smaller size. Almost like Pentax came up with
the
I have the below listed on eBay.
Vivitar 283 in EX+ condition. Includes the PC cord.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1334027517
Quantaray MF 35-80mm f/4 - 4/5.6 in EX+ condition. Includes caps and box
(Free shipping, USA only, if BIN is used)
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi
See ya in a couple of weeks, guys
My mailbox overfloweth and I'm gonna do a little mini-trip,too.
annsan dashing off to majorduomo to unsub..
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pent
Flash shouldn't make a difference. It seems that you have a short in the
camera. That is if the led's in the view finder turn off after you stop
pressing the shutter button. Another possibility falls under stupid user
error. Was something pressing on the shutter button, (and was it unlocked),
This cable A stuff has me confused. I've used a standard
mechanical plunger successfully with my Supers for quite as while;
the shutter button has the standard thread and the plunger certainly
trips the shutter. How would a specialized electronic cable even
work?
-Lon, scratching his head
You mean they're not?
At 10:31 AM 2/23/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Has anyone else noticed that when you set your heart on buying a certain
>lens or body, you are suddenly afflicted with the paranoid notion that
>EVERYONE ELSE is after the same item, no matter how obscure?
>
>
>
>James ([EMAIL PR
Unfortunately my MX is about 20 years old. The FM3a is being made today.
At 10:17 AM 2/23/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>At 00:55 23-2-2002 -0500, you wrote:
>>From: Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Camera for Limited lenses
>>
>>After handling one with the 45mm lens I can say it seems t
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:00:55 -0500
> From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Where's Pentax?
>
> I Why they built the camera a year ago, but as
> usual decided that their customers didn't need anything like that.
Pextax
> whose motto from corporate headquarters to their deale
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dear Mr Pentax : >)
>
> Are you saying that Nikon make two different 80-200 f2.8 lenses?
>
> YES
> AF-S 80-200mm f/2.8D IF-ED
> AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED
>
> And before responding negatively read Pals e-mail below he summed up
what I was
> trying to say. Instea
Pål wrote:
>In the late 80's Pentax had 72 lenses
>while in the period from, say, 89 to about 97 the biggest complains
from
>Pentax users were the lack of lenses. Nikon have been very careful by
>offering their users choices.
---
It took sadly longer for Pentax to provide a complete lineup of AF
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dear Mr Pentax : >)
>
> Are you saying that Nikon make two different 80-200 f2.8 lenses?
>
> YES
> AF-S 80-200mm f/2.8D IF-ED
> AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED
>
> And before responding negatively read Pals e-mail below he summed up what I was
> trying to say. Instea
Steve Larson wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
> Congrats on the KX! No s**t, the KX will do MLU and self timer at the same
> time?
Yessir it will. MLU also stops down the lens. And, if you want
to shoot on BULB with or without MLU, the lock button on the shutter
button
collar will lock BULB on until you u
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:00:55 -0500
> From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Where's Pentax?
>
> I Why they built the camera a year ago, but as
> usual decided that their customers didn't need anything like that. Pextax
> whose motto from corporate headquarters to their deale
But Alan would say it wasn't designed to be a professional camera as was
the Nikon F.
But your point was one I wanted to make too.
At 07:48 AM 2/23/2002 -0500, Paul wrote:
>Alan Chan wrote:
>
> > Before the LX, there
> > was no true professional 135 system from Pentax .
>
>When I was shooting m
You can get an MZ-S it's just not available in local shops.
At 01:38 AM 2/23/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>>They already have - the chrome MZ-S. Maybe the distributor in your country is
>>not offering it, however..
>
>I think the chrome MZ-S would never be imported in the North America. :(
Nikon FM3A Metal body feels real nice in the hands. MZ/ZX-M plastic body
feels like
err plastic. Price $600.00 US vs $160.00 US I would assume that there is
some difference in quality.
At 09:07 AM 2/23/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>MZ-M?
>All the best!
>Raimo
>Personal photography homepage at
>http
Paul, unless the contacts on the bottom of the camera interface to
a cable, I don't think this is what you want. The super program
shutter button accepts a standard mechanical plunger release.
Even if there IS an electrical release, why use it? The older
mechanical plunger releases are a LOT to
Congratulations, Paul.
They're nice, aren't they?
I think you'll find, in constant light,
that sometimes the KX will be a bit quicker
to use than your Super Programs.
I like the SuperProgram only for flash situations.
Other than that, the KX is my main squeeze.
Welcome to the KX/MX/LX Sissy For
"Frits J. Wüthrich" wrote:
>
> Does that lip of sheet metal prevents the back from being opened? Is it
> possible to change the film while the camera is on the tripod?
>
> Do all three QR plates attach to all Bogen heads that have the QR mechanism?
The plates are aimed at their respective heads
>Where is Pentax in all of this. Why they built the camera a year ago, but as
>usual decided that their customers didn't need anything like that. Pextax
>whose motto from corporate headquarters to their dealers is, "Pentax? We
>don't sell them".
Allow me to play Devil's advocate for a moment. A w
That's only part of the equation, IMO. Constant agitation can produce
some nice results (although I'm only familiar with results from the Jobo
system, and don't know much about it's workings or how different it may
be from other systems). In this case I think there are issues of
developer diluti
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> highlights are burnt out and blocked, shadow detail is
> almost nonexistent ..
I think the high contrast may be the result of contant agitation.
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
If the flash should not cause the problem. Do the viewfinder LED's go out
approximately 25 sec after activation? Does anything in your bag touch the
exposure compensation release?
Regards,
Bob...
"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the
Hello Bob. Or Boz.
Do you know what differentiates the two series? K lenses always seemed larger and had
different fascia rings?
Kind regards
peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit t
I am going to make a very harsh and direct comment, but I hope you take
it in the spirit I mean it.
These photos are awful. They lack decent tonality, with a clear lack of
good mid tones, highlights are burnt out and blocked, shadow detail is
almost nonexistent ... perhaps you're having problems
This only happens to people that are obsessed with eBay, and
usually results in paying too much for the item to prevent
someone else from getting it.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: "Paul F. Stregevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 9:
> Has anyone else noticed that when you set your heart on buying a certain
> lens or body, you are suddenly afflicted with the paranoid notion that
> EVERYONE ELSE is after the same item, no matter how obscure?
>
--
I'm not p
No one seems to want the SMC 135/2.5K that I posted a couple days ago at an
asking price of $150. Would anyone wish to trade me their SMC !35/3.5K +
$90 for my SMC 135/2.5K + hood?
No 135/3.5Ms, please; I know they're fine lenses, too, but I'm hooked on
the K since reading Daphne's comment (on
Yep; it even closes down the diaphragm during mirror lockup. And MLU can be
canceled if you change your mind. Very flexible.
"Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No s**t, the KX will do MLU and self timer at the same
time?
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
13 Selby Court
Poolesville, Maryland 20
Has anyone else noticed that when you set your heart on buying a certain
lens or body, you are suddenly afflicted with the paranoid notion that
EVERYONE ELSE is after the same item, no matter how obscure?
James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Call me sentimental, but I really want a replacement f
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Just don't call it a "photographic" cart or the price will triple.
>From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: P67 myth
>
> Yeah, like if the photo shops catch wind of me using "M&Ms Minis"
>canisters as holders for exposed 120. You'd end up buying t
At 00:55 23-2-2002 -0500, you wrote:
>From: Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Camera for Limited lenses
>
>After handling one with the 45mm lens I can say it seems to be a lovely
>camera. Almost as nice as my MX with the 43mm.
Glad you said "almost" there...
Wendy
---
Wendy Beard
You might actually get it for substantially less than $100 - for that price you might
be able to get a whole camera on a good day!
ppro
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jmadams
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 12:49 AM
> To: [EMA
Another strange thing happened with the "almost new" LX. Thursday evening I
put in a pair of new batteries (Duracell 1.5V Silver Oxide), I shot 1
(one!) roll of film to test it and on Saturday morning the camera was dead!
After 36 hours and 1 roll of film. I put in a new pair of batteries and it
w
>congrats! One of the best Pentax bodies ever.
Agreed -- that's a sweet camera. I love mine.
-- Glenn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
No TTL for flash here :-(
Maciej
- Original Message -
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MZ-M?
> All the best!
> Raimo
> Personal photography homepage at
http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
>
> >On Friday 22 February 2002 16:41, you wrote:
> >> A Full mechanical body
For the foreseeable future, I will have some extra space on my web
site. I will donate a page to anyone who would like to put up a few
pictures and even help with writing some simple HTML code to make a neat
presentation.
I'll set up a "guest photographer" section, and each photographer can
have
JCO said:
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 21:46:29 -0500
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fun with 35mm TMAX 400
I changed my recipe with TMAX 400 ( 35mm )
today. Instead of 6.5 minutes at 75 deg.
only developed it for 5.5 minutes ( film
rated iso250).
Got less grain and contrast whi
Yeep, sure it looks big compared to slower brothers. Still, it handles
great and I just love it's speed for low light shooting. It could be used as
fancy paperweight too.
Matjaz
> Just for you, the FA24*/2.0 shown sandwiched between its smaller A and
> K brothers...
>http://membe
Holy lens cap, Batman! Is that puppy about the size of an A*85/1.4?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just for you, the FA24*/2.0 shown sandwiched
> between its smaller A and K brothers...
>http://members.aol.com/dontmailbob/24mm-2.jpg
> ...without the tulip hood attached which adds
> an
From Ralf at the X-star forum:
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/news/df/pentax/Optio230_uk.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I think there should be an FA*24/2.0 next to them to show just how
big it is :) >>
Dave,
Just for you, the FA24*/2.0 shown sandwiched between its smaller A and K
brothers...
http://members.aol.com/dontmailbob/24mm-2.jpg
...without the tulip ho
I was going to say the D100 looks a bit smaller
and lighter than my D1,until i saw the battery
pack.Should weigh in about the same then.
Pentax,were art thou???
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:59:33 -0800
To: Pentax List
Mattias Klum, former Pentax sponsored photographer (does he still use
Pentax MF?), and his wife, who still use Pentax I assume, will feature on a
Nat geo channel in Scandinavia. I will assume that this feature will be
shown world-wide but don't know when.
The feature is about sea eagles shot in
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1334665859
Here's a mis-listing you'll be interested in.
Collin
*
"Get over it."
Dr. Laura
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.
Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) asks:
>> Take a look at this picture of the A24/2.8 next to the K24/2.8.
>> http://members.aol.com/dontmailbob/24mm.jpg
>
> Bob. Is that an M rather than a K, on the right?
Peter,
No, that is a K on the right. 52 mm front filter size.
( SMC PENTAX 1:2.8 24mm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bob. Is that an M rather than a K, on the right?
It doesn't say "Pentax-M" so I'd guess it was a K.
I think there should be an FA*24/2.0 next to them to show just how
big it is :)
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
-
This message is from
>They already have - the chrome MZ-S. Maybe the distributor in your country
>is
>not offering it, however..
I think the chrome MZ-S would never be imported in the North America. :(
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN Photos is
In a message dated 23/02/02 05:57:44 GMT Standard Time, Bob writes:
<< Take a look at this picture of the A24/2.8 next to the K24/2.8.
http://members.aol.com/dontmailbob/24mm.jpg
>>
Bob. Is that an M rather than a K, on the right?
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
