Yesterday I went out with the P30t and took a dozen pictures of snow covered
tree tops for this years HTML Christmas Card on Kodacolor 200. I discovered
something quite interesting. There was half a moon in the sky. I turned the
lens to infinity and discovered, to my surprise, that it was out of fo
Here we go again.
I have pushed C41 quite well, by two stops, and the thread went on for ages.
I posted pictures and some folk suggested I hadn't underexposed, or of
having metered the subject incorrectly. I spoke to the Tetenal technical
people and they agreed, to with a few percent of my calcula
As much as I like grid screens, I hope Pentax will *never* come up
with an LCD superimposed over the viewfinder. The whole point with
a SLR as opposed to whatever other camera design is the TTL,
optical viewfinder, which needs to be as bright as possible, with
as much magnification
Feroze Kistan a écrit:
I though that the date back model was
called MZS-Quartz
..
In Europe the MZ-S is always sold with data back
And I believe, as all over the world
Michel
Fred a écrit:
Check this out, guys:))
http://www.allegro.pl/show_item.php?item=8628799
A monster !!
>Interesting. The marks in my lens are radial, ie they go around the lens
in a circular pattern and cover basically the whole area of the element. Is
this typical of your experience?
Yes. What's worse? The FA*200/2.8 I just returned had an ED element (2nd or
3rd, can't be certain by looking fr
>
> On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Dan Scott wrote:
> Not all Americans Frank. The closest thing to meat my wife, son, and I
> ate today was the milk and butter in the mashed potatoes. Which were
> very good by the way.
>
No turkey at my house. Also no overeating, no extra relatives, and no
p
Alan Chan wrote:
> I can tell you that the cleaning marks could be performed by the Pentax
> factory. No, I am no insane. Most of my Pentax lenses were bought brand
> new from Japan, HK, Canada or US. Some of them do show hand-cleaning marks
> inside.
Interesting. The marks in my lens are radial
Herb Chong wrote:
> what if it has been disassembled and not put back together right?
That thought had crossed my mind. It might be interesting to find out
what it'd cost to have it checked and fixed if necessary. But I'd have
to be 100% certain that the lens is supposed to be sharper than my
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> DSLRs use smaller sensors than 24 X 36 mm 35mm film does.
> Thus, for a given angle of view, they use shorter focal length
> lenses. Shorter lenses give better depth of field.
More DOF is not always better!
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Chet wrote:
> It goes back to something I was wondering about earlier when I noticed
> that the SMC 300 is marked to focus to 300 feet before infinity; the M*
> and A* dropped to 150 feet before infinity; and the F* has dropped to 60
> (or 80?) feet before infinity.
That would be due to the amoun
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 01:41 PM, Cotty wrote:
OS 8 ???
Ancient history! I run 9.1 and even that's old now! But stable,
especially under pressure. Please have a look at a modern machine
running
9.X or Ten (OS X) if you can. Ask the operator what the stability is
li
Dan,
So tell me about this Jupiter-9. Is this a K-mount lens?
Michael Cross
Dan Scott wrote:
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 07:49 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Haven't received a message in a couple of hours. I know all the
Americans are eating turkey. What about the rest of the world
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 07:49 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Haven't received a message in a couple of hours. I know all the
Americans are eating turkey. What about the rest of the world? :-)
-curious frank
Not all Americans Frank. The closest thing to meat my wife, son, and I
at
>>> If you didn't mind extending your test, what happens at around 35
>>> meters, which would be within the focal range of the A*300 (with
>>> depth of field effect) but at infinity for the F*300?
>>
>> Chet, I'm glad you were asking Dave that question, because I
>> don't understand the question
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 05:07 PM, Lon Williamson wrote:
And thank you for your PDML posts. You, Cotty, and Cassleberry
routinely make me laugh and learn at the same time.
-Lon
Thank you.
Dan
I've had "bugs" down under. They seem to be kin to what we call Florida
lobsters, the kind without claws. In any case, they taste very good.
Paul
frank theriault wrote:
>
> Paul Jones wrote:
>
> > Those little ones dont really taste like anything.
>
> Agreed. Like eating pencil erasers - the s
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 03:08 PM, McRae, Max MS wrote:
The birds proved quite difficult to get really close to and I never
got my male in full display before they all wandered off under a fence
into another property.
A fascinating creature the turkey...hideously ugly and yet
comp
> Frank wrote;
> >Somehow, I think you're talking about something a whole lot different.
>
> Sure are, to give you an idea, this model of a prawn is 1:1...
> http://www.glenn.com.au/big_prawn.htm
>
You could feed a small nation off that!
hi all,
is the HP Scanjet 7400c scanner with the included adapter for scanning
negatives, slides any good? i want to use it for hobby/amateur use and
scan some of my slides.
any special tips to get the most out of it?
thanks!
gaurav
__
Frank wrote;
>Somehow, I think you're talking about something a whole lot different.
Sure are, to give you an idea, this model of a prawn is 1:1...
http://www.glenn.com.au/big_prawn.htm
:-)
Simon
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 29 N
You'd love it Frank. The Bugs are like small crayfish (lobsters), and the
yabbies are just freshwater prawns. Crayfish are lobster, and prawns are
shrimp, only much bigger, and they shouldn't taste like old socks. If they
do, you take them back to the guy who sold them too you, and assault him
with
My N80 has this (same finder). It is done with a LCD overlay, along with the
AF sensor indicators. The lines are wide and distracting. One would not want
them on unless they were really needed. The problem is that they are turned
on and off via a custom function and that makes it cumbersome to togg
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: Is it possible to "pull" C41 film
> Made a bonehead mistake today. Shot 4 rolls of
> film at ISO 100 (mostly flash), Problem was the
> last roll was ISO 400 film ( Fuji NPH). Should
> I be okay with the 2 stop overexposure on the last
>
Heh...Heh...you northerners!
The only slimy part is the oysters, but that's half the fun. The other stuff
should all be crisp to the bite, and sweet to the taste. If it isn't, then
you definitely know where you'll be spending the rest of the day...'driving
the porcelain bus'...if you get my drift.
Paul Jones wrote:
> Those little ones dont really taste like anything.
Agreed. Like eating pencil erasers - the sauce is obviously to "kill the
taste".
>
> There pretty non-invasive if there fresh and there usualy frozen at sea to
> keep them fresh. There not like Oysters etc etc which seem t
> Nope, never had prawns, at least not ~your~ type of prawns. Had shrimp,
those
> puny little frozen things that you dip into some sort of tomatoey "sea
food
> sauce" out of a jar. Tolerable, but not among my faves.
Those little ones dont really taste like anything.
> Sounds like if I ate thos
Hmmm:
I think I've called you "Shawn" at least twice tonight. Sorry, S-h-a-u-n!
-frank
frank theriault wrote:
> Hi, Shawn,
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears
it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
Hi, Shawn,
Nope, never had prawns, at least not ~your~ type of prawns. Had shrimp, those
puny little frozen things that you dip into some sort of tomatoey "sea food
sauce" out of a jar. Tolerable, but not among my faves.
Somehow, I think you're talking about something a whole lot different.
So
Hey, Jeff,
Biting my tongue on this one...
Went to school with Ms. Ducros (the "moron" utterer), BTW. Back then she was
known as "Francie", not Francoise. Hearing her name constantly for the better
part of a week didn't do it, then it clicked in when I saw her pic in the paper
on Monday. Yup
I was thinking along the same lines.
Since overexposure tends to pump up
the contrast, I should be OK since
NPH is a low contrst film to begin with.
And yes, it's amazing how much you can
correct for in scanning/photoshop
processing. I think I'll go with standard
C41 processing after all. I do all
Very carefully, 'cause they are cranky beasts, and their beaks are real sharp!
-frank
Shaun Canning wrote:
> How do you get them in the pipe?
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
Oops... I mean F*300/4.5, not FA*400/5.6 which I have never had.
regards,
Alan Chan
Unlikely. I stripped one of this lens few years ago and there was no chance
for error. As long as the elements were in correct order, it would be as
good as new.
__
Well, the reason I want to switch from W98 I'm currently running
is that I have to reboot to many times a day. Usually when I'm
about to save my work. So I want something more stable.
2k Pro is certainly much better, if not perfect.
regards,
Alan Chan
__
what if it has been disassembled and not put back together right?
Unlikely. I stripped one of this lens few years ago and there was no chance
for error. As long as the elements were in correct order, it would be as
good as new.
regards,
Alan Chan
__
How do you get them in the pipe?
Cheers
Shaun Canning
Archaeology Department
La Trobe University
Bundoora, Victoria, 3086.
Phone: 0414-967 644
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 29 November 2002 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
> Not to worry about sarcasm. Turkeys are ugly, ungainly, and unbelievably
> stupid. However, when smoked for about 5 hours over hickory chips, they
are
> also unbelievably delicious.
Never had smoked turkey, we usually roast it in Australia and probaly the
only time i have Turkey is on xmas da
I should send you a Pentax 645 or Mamiya 7 slide :)
- Original Message -
From: "Simon King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:35 PM
Subject: What a rush
> I've got to let this out...
>
> Got my first roll of NPC 160 back today. I'd used it for
>
> >Never tried prawns.
> You may know them as "shrimp". Same thing, except they're bigger and
tastier
> in Australia.
>
> I really had to bite my tongue when we had an American describe what a
> turkey was. I mean really. Come to think of it, better stop now must
> ...resist ...sarcasm
Not
I'm probably not someone to answer this question, but here goes.
My understanding is that C41 cannot really be pushed or pulled with
satisfactory results. However the latitude of most C41 films can handle
overexposure better than under. If it were me, I'd process it normally and
use Photoshop fo
I've got to let this out...
Got my first roll of NPC 160 back today. I'd used it for some
portrait/Christmas card shots I'd taken of our son.
Wow! For me, this is what it's all about. The feeling you get when the shots
are better than you expected, it was *fantastic*!
All the talk of f stops and h
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:21:59 -0500
"J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Made a bonehead mistake today. Shot 4 rolls of
> film at ISO 100 (mostly flash), Problem was the
> last roll was ISO 400 film ( Fuji NPH). Should
> I be okay with the 2 stop overexposure on the last
> roll or is the
Haven't received a message in a couple of hours. I know all the
Americans are eating turkey. What about the rest of the world? :-)
-curious frank
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
>> > Does Bruce's Breweries still exist? I remember frequenting the Frog and
>> > Firkin
> Where IS one?
> I have a small replica Frog and Firkin pub sign I hang up above my
> wine rack.
> Got in England a couple of years ago.
> I'd like to visit one, if for nothing more than to add to some of the
> What's the feeling on the M 35mm f2.8?
Its not that sharp, the K35/3.5 blows it away.
Cotty wrote, in part:
> With the working MX in the bag sits a Tok 17 f3.5 (the old kind), a M 35
> 2.8, a M 50 1.7, and a Tok 90 2.5 macro. She loves the 35mm.
It seems like every time 35mm primes come up around here everyone raves
about the 35mm f2.0 lenses. What's the feeling on the M 35mm f2.
And thank you for your PDML posts. You, Cotty, and Cassleberry
routinely make me laugh and learn at the same time.
-Lon
Dan Scott wrote:
>
> This is a day most Americans will spend with family and friends and,
> while gorging themselves on traditional foods, reflect on their extreme
> good fort
What follows is a long, dreary MX appraisal from yours
truely. It was asked for, but I think these folks are
just "being nice." Review after their comments.
Now mind you, folks, I've ALWAYS had an unreasonable
lust for KX bodies. I have 4 of them now and had 0
of them in the 70s, 80s, and about
>> > Does Bruce's Breweries still exist? I remember frequenting the Frog and
>> > Firkin
>
>Where IS one?
>I have a small replica Frog and Firkin pub sign I hang up above my
>wine rack.
>Got in England a couple of years ago.
>I'd like to visit one, if for nothing more than to add to some of the
>ph
On 28 Nov 2002 at 13:25, andre wrote:
> I noticed that the IR (infra-red) mark on Takumar lenses were
> generally closer to infinity with newer designs (50/1.4 8-elements
> being an exception). Does it mean that a lens with an IR mark closer
> to infinity is better corrected for axial chromati
On 28 Nov 2002 at 19:28, Cotty wrote:
> Indeed, this is one thing that the D60 lacks. The D100 allows a very
> useful grid to be switched on in a sort of overlay method. Great for
> landscapes and whatnot. Pentax bods reading this? Get a grid!!
This is interesting, obviously it would utilize an
Hi, Mike,
Well, being Canadian, we beat you Americans to the punch - our Thanksgiving is in
early October. We have turkey, too, and even football (Canadian Football, that
is). No Pilgrims, though...
Our Thanksgiving isn't nearly as big a deal as it is for you guys, but hell, a long
weekend is a
Albano wrote:
> Interesting article...
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/like-it-is.shtml
I haven't read it yet. But the problem I have with this guiy is that when he says he
is comparing film to digital he is in reality testing the quality of his scanner
compared to digital capture
William wrote:
> If the subject size is kept the same on the film (reproduction
> ratio), then DOF will also be the same at any given aperture, no
> matter what format you use.
True. But that was not was I was getting at. I was talking about the same angle of
view from the same shooting distance
Cheers Blakely,
I aim to please, but my email is hardly vitriol. If this is about a US
holiday, sorry, then again, why are you here instead of with family and
eating and drinking and shooting? Moreover, it was a comment by a Canadian
to a Canadian anyhow and this is an international group, not a
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: DOF in DSLRs - HELP ME PLEASE...
> William wrote:
>
> > Reproduction ratio is how large the subject is on the film,
not
> > the print.
>
>
> Then we agree...
More than likely.
I suspect there might be a difference in semantics is all.
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: DOF in DSLRs - HELP ME PLEASE...
> William wrote:
>
> > > If you shoot the same subject at the same subject size
(angle
> > of view) with the same subject camera distance at the same
> > aperture but with differnt focal lengths, you'll g
William wrote:
> Reproduction ratio is how large the subject is on the film, not
> the print.
Then we agree...
Pål
Butch wrote:
> As a photofinisher I must disagree. Technically only 1 point is in actual
> focus, everything else is increasingly out of focus (circle of confusion).
> So as you enlarge further, less area is perceived to be in focus.
The point in focus will be equally less sharp with magnificat
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: DOF in DSLRs - HELP ME PLEASE...
> > Depth of field is a factor of reproduction ratio and
aperture.
> > Focal length doesn't enter into the equation.
>
>
> No. DOF has everything to do with focal lenght. Reproduction
ration doesn't eneter
William wrote:
> > If you shoot the same subject at the same subject size (angle
> of view) with the same subject camera distance at the same
> aperture but with differnt focal lengths, you'll get different
> DOF. This is the effect we are discussing here.
>
> What you are describing is impossibl
tried that of course, got a lot of music hits, and lots of
sites where they selling them. I needed to find more product info
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Len Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 9:31 PM
Subject: RE: electra studio flas
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: DOF in DSLRs - HELP ME PLEASE...
> If you shoot the same subject at the same subject size (angle
of view) with the same subject camera distance at the same
aperture but with differnt focal lengths, you'll get different
DOF. This is the e
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
> be produced. Hence my comment about a moribund brand. I think the only way
> to keep this group focused is to have the resident lunatic run around naked,
> setting himself on fire.
As the lone Nikon user in a world of Pentax... well, should we start a
Bob Walkden wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Does Bruce's Breweries still exist? I remember frequenting the Frog and
> > Firkin
Where IS one?
I have a small replica Frog and Firkin pub sign I hang up above my
wine rack.
Got in England a couple of years ago.
I'd like to visit one, if for nothing more than
Hi,
> Does Bruce's Breweries still exist? I remember frequenting the Frog and
> Firkin
there are still some Firkin pubs around but I don't think they're
owned by Bruce's anymore. Haven't been into one in years. I remember
going to one somewhere near Waterloo once with a friend who wasn't
familiar
Close.
DOF is determined by a combination of focal length and diaphragm opening
diameter (aperture).
All 150mm lenses @ f8 have the SAME dof (providing for minor variations
because of varying lens designs). It doesn't matter if the coverage of the
lens is for 24x36mm or 6x7cm or 4x5in. 150mm is
Title: Speaking of turkeys...
Turkeys were introduced to New Zealand as domesticated birds with the English settlers, and inevitably some escaped and formed feral, self maintaining flocks all over the country.
Just yesterday, I stopped on my way home from work to shot a flock on a dairy farm
On 28 Nov 2002 at 12:12, Herb Chong wrote:
> Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >From 36*24mm, you need to enlarge roughly 5 times to get a 5*7.
> From 24*16mm - surely you need to enlarge by 7 times to get the same
> 5*7?
>
> What has this to do with pixels?<
>
> there is an a
Dobo,
I respectfully request that you reserve your vitriol for tomorrow.
Regards,
Bob
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy!"
- Benjamin Franklin
From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You would
Ok, maybe I misunderstood you
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: OT More Windows questions
> Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >There is a driver to read a NT
>12 pints of Dogbloater and a Prawn Dhansak at the Taj and Cotty'll be
>gassing too...
Bob,
Does Bruce's Breweries still exist? I remember frequenting the Frog and
Firkin in W11 way back in the early 80s. Two pints at the time: Bullfrog
and Dogbolter. When Prince Charles married Lady Di they br
Interesting article...
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/like-it-is.shtml
Regards
=
Albano Garcia
"El Pibe Asahi"
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
My dog has three ears. Now I'm sure that my fridge light stays on...
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:12:21 -0500 Brad Dobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This that Americanese?
Very good. I too enjoy Thanksgiving. It's the only time I can tell
people to "get stuffed".
Len
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Blakely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: HA!
>
>
> So this mother turkey says t
Hi Dan,
It's inappropriatesness is only in relation to public exposure.
WE know what we mean, and WE know there's no disrespect there, but the
others who are more simple-minded may NOT know, and think it's okay to
'make fun of' the mentally disabled. That would be sad...
I'll admit, I have cracked
MC? This that Americanese? Funny how I could predict those who would
respond because of their uh, 'attitudes' and lack of filters, as they don't
want to miss a chance to comment on me. Have fun children!
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
You would William. At the expense of others.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-d Digest V02 #38
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dan Scott
> Subject: Re: pe
Comment at bottom:
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-d Digest V02 #38
> Comment at bottom:
>
> Brad Dobo wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Sco
I noticed some Old Engine Oil on the shelf at my local booze store - I
passed on it in favor of Bass Ale and some Pinkus Organic (?) from someplace
in Bavaria I believe. I hope our guests are willing to experiment a bit!
This is not Bud Lite . . .
I'll have a small Sheeps Dip after the turkey dinn
Hi,
12 pints of Dogbloater and a Prawn Dhansak at the Taj and Cotty'll be
gassing too...
---
Bob
Thursday, November 28, 2002, 3:23:39 PM, you wrote:
>>> And I'll be sat back with a tepid pint of Old Stumpy Firkin's Dog Breath
>>> Extra Strong brewed in a Chelsea Pensioner's coffin
> That's
So this mother turkey says to her misbehaving chicks, "If your father could
see you now, he'd roll over in his gravy!"
Regards,
Bob
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy!"
- Benjamin Franklin
>And for Cotty:
>> Not being funny, or provocative, or abusive. You asked
>> a valid question and I will give you a valid answer.
>>
>> Macintosh OS.
>
>That's not an option. I'm sitting in fron of a PC - that's the
>main reason.
>And the other is that MacOS 8 on the old Mac we have at work is
>>> And I'll be sat back with a tepid pint of Old Stumpy Firkin's Dog Breath
>>> Extra Strong brewed in a Chelsea Pensioner's coffin
>
>That's the difference between the PDML and the LUG...on the LUG they're
>always gassing about single-malts. Here we have Cotty and his Brit
>moonshine! Long live t
LMAO - next we'll be handing out traffic violations to F1 cars at MC...
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:56:47 -0500 Brad Dobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a little inappropriate here.
See www.google.com/ enter the words "electra studio flash" and click on
the search button. You will be rewarded with many links. Welcome to
the Internet.
Len
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Feroze Kistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 12:54 PM
> To:
>On the better cameras, is there a function to change the look of the finder?
>I'm thinking it would be easy to add several different finder screen looks
>to the software to accommodate different conditions and users.
>Got this idea while skimming the "Photo Tips" on the inside of a Kodak film
>pac
>>
>>
>> Urp. Hi Mike!
>
>
>Enthused greetings, good Sir. I trust you are well and hale? I'm glad to
>find you here despite your recent migration to the realm of pixelation.
>--Mike
Yer wot lad? Eeeeh, thee don't 'alf talk rubbish. Any road, dunno much
about all this Pentax lark - all I know i
If you didn't mind extending your test, what happens at around 35
meters, which would be within the focal range of the A*300 (with
depth of field effect) but at infinity for the F*300?
Chet, I'm glad you were asking Dave that question, because I don't
understand the question - . (Sorry.)
Fre
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I wonder if that's why
> Thanksgiving is my favorite holiday. More likely, it's
> because a) I don't
> have to buy or decorate anything, and b) I get to eat a
> richly prepared
> feast and watch football on telev
No, but the amount of enlargement is determined by the size of the
sensor.
Its now sounding as though enlargement isnt the main deciding factor in
DOF, which goes against what I have been repeatedly told in the past.
But then why does changing the format change the COC in fcalc?
This is VERY conf
I'll be traveling until Saturday, but will see you all then. Happy
Thanksgiving. And go Packers.
--Mike
"The life of an intellectual should be a permanent reproach to the idea that
knowledge has to be handed down to us from authority." (unattributed:
unidentified TV talk show guest)
***
Thanks for the tip Paul
Dave
I load 120 starting with the end that comes off the reel first -- the
> end that's not taped. I then let the paper fall away as I load. When I
> get to the end of the film strip, I pull the tape off rather than try to
> cut the film.
> Paul
I also have Super A and it is very nice camera, indeed. Metering is accurate, I take
mostly slides so it is good test!
I use it as second body (PZ1 is first).
Alek
t really should not have been left out of the Super
>> Program/A.
>
>Oops - "...out of the Program Plus/A."
>
>Fred
>
Hi Maciej,
I've been freelancing in book production for over 25 years and file
imaging for some 14 years.
The particular OS is not important.
In terms of importance, the following are the key factors:
1. What your printer (and/or imager) expects to receive
2. Clean postscript or Adobe Acrobat
Hi Dave,
If you didn't mind extending your test, what happens at around 35
meters, which would be within the focal range of the A*300 (with
depth of field effect) but at infinity for the F*300?
Thanks!
--Chet
I just finished looking over the slides from my 300mm lens test. The
test was pe
>> And I'll be sat back with a tepid pint of Old Stumpy Firkin's Dog Breath
>> Extra Strong brewed in a Chelsea Pensioner's coffin
That's the difference between the PDML and the LUG...on the LUG they're
always gassing about single-malts. Here we have Cotty and his Brit
moonshine! Long live the Pro
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>It seems that anywhere they have been reintroduced they've thrived. When
I
was a youngster back in the 50's - 60's, it was unusual to see any in the
wild. Now they're becoming really common.
Bill<
they have become a nuisance sometimes. have ye
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>What I found peculiar was the section discussing chromatic aberrations,
given
the lack of test detail one would wonder if it was more a function of the
lens
and/or angle of incidence on the sensor rather than a direct function of
the
sensor (as
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>However if I hold it "just right" I
can see what may be cleaning marks on an internal element (I purchased
this lens secondhand). Maybe thats causing a bit of softness. Would
other owners of this lens care to comment?<
what if it has been di
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
