in the "bin".
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: 5n Bummer? - delete this thread
> This message is devoid of any content, just like this thread...
>
>
No, this is not the PMA.
But merely, I made the test of my method of transformation of an M / K
lens applied to an objective to screw-mount gone up on the MZ-S with a
adaptor-K
THAT FUNCTIONS!!
To see here:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/multizone.htm
Michel
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg /
> just a warning, I'm normally good around these things but this new
> set went tru an apple like it was butter, and almost took my
> finger with it. 2 stitches to patch it up :-(
Well, then you aren't to be trusted around sharp lenses, so you must
sell off any that you have very cheaply to the re
Leica is not in a very good financial state. It is not easy to survive by making
something like 10.000 rangefinder cameras and 5.000 SLRs a year - the Japanese produce
this in less than a week.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkupe
Smallness is one of the reasons for its success. Uncomplicated interface is another.
The viewfinder is comparable to other cameras of its class but the display should be
at the bottom - like the MZ-S has.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-
There is no reason why the MX should not be durable. The small size is not against it.
Actually it is about the same size as a Leica M and they are supposed to be
indestructible - but I have had some problems with my M6 (two problems in 17 years) -
it is being repaired even right now. l owned th
Not quite.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: John Whicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 01. helmikuuta 2003 1:18
Aihe: Re: PMA and Pentax DSLR
>
>Pål
Pentax better than C*., N*. and M*. !!
Pentax matrix metering is available for ALL Pentax, even the oldest
lenses, with a little modification. Here:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/multizone.htm
Michel
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg /
Sorry I'm late on this, Robert. The Digests have become infrequent and
sporadic again, and I'm unfortunately missing quite a bit. Can be a
blessing in disguise though ;-)
Best of luck for the future,
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.maca
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: Vs: LX Questions
> Mark Roberts posted, among other things:
> > >> I read an interview with the then Asahi boss, Minoru Suzuki, who
> explained in
> > >> detail
Interestingly, if you're over 30, the big S-Class Benz is still
attractive, for those with the bucks.
A LOT of folks love those older Mercedes and appreciate the fact that
there is another company out there besides M-B able and willing to
supply a comparable car.
I'd bet the Lexus doesn't require
hope it wasn't your "shooting" finger!
cheers,
frank
Brendan wrote:
> just a warning, I'm normally good around these things
> but this new set went tru an apple like it was butter,
> and almost took my finger with it. 2 stitches to patch
> it up :-(
>
> _
Rob Studdert wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Fisheye shots are fine for shooting crowded interiors
particularly if a 15mm
> won't cut it. A rectilinear corrected 16mm fisheye shot
will provide the
> equivalent horizontal angle of view of a 7.5mm lens in the
35mm format. If it
> needs to be presented on film
Yes, there is a vast difference in quality. Especially in those Japanese and
American cars that are assembled on the same factory in California such as
the Chevrolet Malibu and the Toyota Avalon. Also everybody knows the Nissan
SUV is better than the Ford SUV that is built in the same plant in Mich
Hi Mike.
I purposefully took some time to think this thru before I answered
you, so I was actually thinking about my answer instead of just
knee-jerk responding to some of your comments.
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> Warning! Rant mode on.
>
> > Oh, no in this country, Pål. We pretend they're all th
Hi Peter,
Is there no governing body or organisation for pro's in your country? Around
here you have to join the PPSA (Professional Photographers of Southern
Africa) to get that status. To join you have to have a 3 year technikon
diploma or have served under a registered pro as an appie. You still
Another dumb question:
Are you supposed to use a lens hood when shooting indoors or at night, or is
the hood only to prevent flare from sunlight?
Feroze
Feroze Kistan wrote:
>
> Are you supposed to use a lens hood when shooting indoors
or at night, or is
> the hood only to prevent flare from sunlight?
Hi Feroze,
The simple answer is to use the lens hood for every single
shot. Always.
I'm not sure what the complex answer is. I'm just a simple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Keith the problem I see is that we are all to quick to put animals out of
> their misery. It's too damned easy to say hell just put a bullet in their
> head. With a little effort these animals can live a normal life.
With a little effort? What does that mean?
If yo
Sounds much as i do except we have a dryer at the school.The
scratched negs are all from the batch i had taken in last year to
have 5x7's made for a portfolio.Must have happened at the lab or
maybe saomething i did.
Scan time and blurage for those ones now:)
Dave
Begin Original Message ---
T Rittenhouse wrote:
>
[...]
> GWB's speach seems to have achived its intended purpose as gasoline prices
> around here jumped 10 cents a gallon yesterday.
And, what purpose was that?
keith
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
> http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
Must run in the neigbourhood.I wacked my left index finger with the
back end of a 2 lb hatchet Thursday.Did not go for stitches but,
ouch.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 22:10:49 -0500 (EST)
To: Pentax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
I see that Klaus Garcia is promoting his $40 ME Super CLA on ebay again.
He mentioned something about a journalism class in one of his emails so
I assume he is a college student. He has worked on three of my ME/ME
Supers and they came back working like new again. Here is what he did
on the l
K300/4 -- rough external, the tiniest flaw in the front coating. $125
Aetna Tele Rokunar 300/5.6 T-mount (no adapter included). $15
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3004983669&category=15240
On 29 Jan 2003 at 15:12, Feroze Kistan wrote:
> Another dumb question:
> Are you supposed to use a lens hood when shooting indoors or at night, or is the
> hood only to prevent flare from sunlight?
Any light source outside the frame can promote flare (and inside the frame of
course), so the best
It's not a dumb question and I hope this isn't a dumb answer. I always
use a lens hood. SMC is great, but using a lens hood also helps to
reduce lens flare. It also keeps rain off the front element and
protects the front of the lens from incidental contact with hard
elements, unless, of cour
I bought a new color cartridge for my Color 740 last weekend. I've been
printing a lot this week, trying to figure out why all my prints look
washed-out. You may recall I was asking about color management. I've
printed about eight 5X7 photos and a few smaller ones and now the ink's low
again. I
Cory.
This is were the individual tanks come in handy.I get about 48
8x10's from a full head on the Canon S 800.Works out to about 4-4.50
per sheet.(Canadian$)
I found Kodak paper did not work well with this printer,but am happy
with the Canon Photo Paper Pro and Ilfords Classic Gloss and Classi
To raise gasoline prices for 10 cents. Oil companies and producers can line their
pockets comfortably. And GWB is an oilman.
I am quite sure that the GWB administration is not going to compensate in any way the
increased fuel prices that consumers all over the world have to pay. Or for the
reces
>From the Minolta users group:
" But, just in case you didn't know, a UK magazine ("Outdoor Photography")
quotes Sigma as saying that the new 80-400mm F4/F5.6 Optical Stabilised
lens will be made available in both Minolta AF and Pentax mounts later
this year. Canon and Nikon Mount versions should
The NASA Space Shuttle Columbia appears to have broken up on re-entry this
morning. The pictures I've seen are eerily similar to the Challenger
disaster we've all seen too many times.
This was the first space flight for an Israeli Astronaut.
God Speed Columbia
Cory Waters
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I've been printing on Kodak Matte picture paper. Would I be getting
markedly
better looking prints on a glossy high-end paper?
If I get a new printer, (~$100-150) should I get another Epson?
Cory<
my opinion. you are using Kodak paper in an Eps
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/index.html
Added some B&W's to my site.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
"Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art
stops and the wall begins"--Frank Zappa
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign u
Here we go again. These subjects have no place on the PDML. Take them
off list or flush them where they belong.
On Saturday 01 February 2003 03:43 pm, Raimo Korhonen wrote:
> To raise gasoline prices for 10 cents. Oil companies and producers
> can line their pockets comfortably. And GWB is an o
If this information is true it must mean that the KAF3 protocol is embedded in
upcoming models or in current ones.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Matti Etelapera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 3:42 PM
Subject: Image stabilizers on Pent
I'm not sure what the specs of the Epson 740, but your cartridge should
be able to produce more than 8 5x7s. I get about 10 to 15 11 x 14s from
each color cartridge on my Epson 1200. I don't like Kodak inkjet papers.
The best glossy is Epson Premium Photo Paper. Epson Archival Matte is
also very ni
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer"
Subject: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit, not politics, not
Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is allowed without
rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
> Here we go again. These subjects have no place on the PDML. Tak
Well, it's your choice.
I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we don't
see another Hanoi Jane (or Baghdad Mike) or some similar thing rise out of
this bullshit to the peril of my son or others due to such idiocy. I watched
fools like you help to cause the death of my fel
No. It was in a Norwegian Photo magazine back in 1980 when the LX was first shown. It
was clear that the LX was meant as a professional camera as the then Asahi boss talked
about how thoroughly the LX was tested and they couldn't afford to release a
professional body that hadn't all the fault ir
Feroze Kistan wrote:
> Thanks guys for all the replies. I had assumed hoods are only
> for sunlight, can studio lights or household lamps cause flare then?
Think of them as "blinders", as on a horse. They will cause
*only* light rays coming directly from the framed image to
The urge to say several things is very difficult to hold back, so I will
just ask you to read your post and think about what it says.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday,
I have a print cutter that's equally dangerous. The last time I wasn't 100%
careful and attentive, I had to pick up a bit of fingertip and tape it back
on. Now I know why the rotary cutters are so popular.
Pat White
Dear Mr Blakely,
The fault does not lie with people who believe war is wrong or that there
has to be another solution. The Americans have a habit of invading foreign
countries and destroying them, we've lived with that problem for 3 decades
thanks to the CIA invlovement in causing the war in South
Hi Bill,
If you are using available light to take and indoor picture, would you not
than be limiting the amount of light reaching the film, or is that the
intention. How does a camera meter then, does it meter diffrently if you are
using a 28mm v/s a 200mm? I might be misunderstanding the concept t
I'd like to thank you, Bill, for your reminder that all Americans are evil and deserve
all the tragedies that come our way. I'd especially like to thank you for reminding us
here on the Pentax list, where we are supposed to celebrate our commonality as people
and photographers no matter our nati
Or just that the pentax version doesn't have the OS?
Seriously, I doubt that Sigma would be able to get the specs from Pentax
before release. They normally have to pull things apart and work it out
for themselves, don't they?
Unless all they need from the body is current, and they can get it fro
This is getting a little stupid. If it wasn't for America, you'd all be
wearing swastikas. And if the Allied powers had held Hitler to the
League of Nations disarmnament agreement in the thirties, hundreds of
thousands of lives would have been spared. The only thing that prevents
a lot of small cou
The camera's meter is only concerned with what the lens sees in it's
field of view. The meter does not differentiate between a 28mm or a
200mm. The lens hood, on the other hand, blocks extraneous light from
striking the lens at angles outside of the lens' field of view. This
extraneous ligh
On the Epson Stylus Photo 750, I get about 25 8x10s from a color cartridge.
I'm not sure about the black cartridge.
Pat White
Hi Ken,
Actually I think I have seen it, I have a few pics I took today that seem to
have a haze over it. Its in focus and colour is right but it looks like a
soft focus filter is on. I had assumed that the UV filter thats currently on
the lens would have taken care of that.
Feroze
- Original
Feroze Kistan wrote:
> If you are using available light to take and indoor picture,
> would you not than be limiting the amount of light reaching the
> film, or is that the intention.
Limiting only in the sense that the lens accepts just
the light reflected directly from the fr
Correct.
But what is happening now in the USA? GWB´s statements are alarmingly similar to what
Hitler said against Poland in 1939.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill was a gracious Canadian on 9/11 and expressed his sympathies to those of
us in the USA.
As the USA approaches war with Sadam, I see peoples around the world seek
ways to avoid the conflict and condemn the USA for threatening to police the
world.
At these times, I cannot help but reflect
Unless I have a particular need for a filter, I don't use one. Most of
us aren't going to spend the $50-70 that a good filter costs just to
protect our lenses. Your UV filter may have added to your problem if
it was one of the cheap off-brand filters. As tough as SMC coating is
supposed to b
GWB's statements are what the Allieds should have been saying in 1935.
Sadaam is easily as evil as Hitler. Sadaam killed his own children.
Hitler never did that.
Raimo Korhonen wrote:
>
> Correct.
> But what is happening now in the USA? GWB´s statements are alarmingly similar to
>what Hitler sai
Raimo,
Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He
sent Skud missiles at Israel and the Saudi's. He conducted a 10 year (?) war
with Iran. If he was your neighbor, you would be looking for a cave to hide
in.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> But what
Hi Ken,
I don't have too much knowledge of filters. This ones is a Hama UV390 C-Haze
filter. Isn't that what haze filters are supposed to prevent?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: Re
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: Vs: Political commentary
> Raimo,
> Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He
> sent Skud missiles at Israel and the Saudi's. H
It's interesting. We've now had at least two dozen posts in regard to
the Iraq situation, but not a single comment on the PUG.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Raimo,
> Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He
> sent Skud missiles at Israel and the Saudi's. He condu
His brain is in the right place, Kuwait is not a neighboring state but part
of Iraq that was seperated by the british, Sadam was trying to get it back.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: Vs: Politica
Sadly, there is only one valid truism about humanity's history:
"The only thing we can learn from our history is that we don't learn
anything from our history".
Dunno if it is for Dubya's or Saddam's benefit, though...
Anyway, they're probably not Pentax users any of them.
Wish they had been, b
> "ALWAYS use a hood" is sound advice.
Or, you could never use a hood.
I've done both over the years. Generally, the flare performance of a lens is
determined by its coatings. The better the coatings, the less necessary a
hood becomes. The worse the coatings, the less a lens hood is going to be
>"ALWAYS use a hood" is sound advice.
>
Well, that sound clever, but what about the risk for vignetting (or what
it's called)? Last autumn I used my LX often together with the M 24/2.8
during a field trip in Greece. Plus a hood I 'thought' was suitable for the
lense. Great shots. But ... a lot of
I think, that despite the calls for not discussing issues like this on this
list, it is apparently too much asked to refrain from responding for people
who feel so strong about the issue discussed, one way or the other.
I can understand that, we are all human, although I don't agree.
Can we at le
> 2) The quick criticism that is offered the policeman, but the lack of
> appreciation and thanks that is given for the benefits others enjoy from
> living in a civilized society. (Why is this? Are you all so shallow that
> you don't recognize that you live under the protection of the police
I can't access the PUG, have been trying since yesterday but all I get is
HTML and no pics. I'm waiting till it comes back on. Any ideas wahts wrong?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 6:28 PM
Subj
Ditto what Herb said.
I've tried Kodak papers, called them to discuss issues and finally decided
I'd stick with Epson papers for my Stylus Photo and 2000P. I get more than
50 4"X6" glossy prints from one color cartridge on my Stylus Photo. Haven't
established a track record for the 2000P as far as
I think my brain is where it used to be. I do not like Saddam Hussein.
But he got thrown out of Kuwait. In the war against Iran he got the full support of
the USA - and we are suffering the consequences of that. GWB is preaching war against
Irag but I think North Korea is more dangerous to us all
Nossir, we don't.
keith
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> > I purposefully took some time to think this thru before I answered
> > you, so I was actually thinking about my answer instead of just
> > knee-jerk responding to some of your comments.
>
> Keith,
> Thanks for the thoughtful reply, but...
>
>
I can access it. I don't know what your problem might be.
Feroze Kistan wrote:
>
> I can't access the PUG, have been trying since yesterday but all I get is
> HTML and no pics. I'm waiting till it comes back on. Any ideas wahts wrong?
> Feroze
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquis
I am on a politics list, called WWWAC-Politics, which is an offshoot of
a web development list called the WWWAC. It was created after 9/11 when
people on the webdev list couldn't stop talking about politics. The
politics list has since taken on a life of its own.
We engage in lively discussions a
> Well, it's your choice.
>
> I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we don't
> see another Hanoi Jane (or Baghdad Mike) or some similar thing rise out of
> this bullshit to the peril of my son or others due to such idiocy. I watched
> fools like you help to cause the dea
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 02:03 PM, Pat White wrote:
The last time I wasn't 100%
careful and attentive, I had to pick up a bit of fingertip and tape it
back
on.
Tape, of course! From now on all of my loose body parts are going to be
taped back on (no more staples for me).
Dan Scott
I guess I redirect this question - otherwise it will drown in the political
discussion:
>"ALWAYS use a hood" is sound advice.
>
Well, that sound clever, but what about the risk for vignetting (or what
it's called)? Last autumn I used my LX often together with the M 24/2.8
during a field trip in G
The last two years have been nice (most of it anyway) but I have had
enough. Cya.
On Saturday 01 February 2003 10:17 pm, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > Well, it's your choice.
> >
> > I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we
> > don't see another Hanoi Jane (or Baghdad Mike)
>>
>> Are you supposed to use a lens hood when shooting indoors
>or at night, or is
>> the hood only to prevent flare from sunlight?
If I may offer the list my working practices
My lowest common denominator is: if in doubt, use the lenshood.
However, it is quite obvious that a lenshood serve
Mike Johnston wrote:
So they're about to blow the crap out of Baghdad. How the hell should I know
why they're doing it? Oil? Politics? Warmongering? Too much saber-rattling
to back down now? Can't find bin Laden and got to take it out on somebody?
Christ, I have no idea. But whatever the reason
> On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 02:03 PM, Pat White wrote:
>
> > The last time I wasn't 100% careful and attentive, I had to pick up
> > a bit of fingertip and tape it back on
>
> Tape, of course! From now on all of my loose body parts are going to be
> taped back on (no more staples
Robert Harris wrote:
>
>
> This list has gone to hell again, with the usual ranting and raving and
> anti-American nonsense from non-thinking know-nothings.
And that's exactly what you posted. More anti-american nonsense from a
non-thinking know-nothing. Mike couldn't BEAR the gun discussion. P
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 03:39 PM, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
After exactly three years on this list, I just want to say goodbye as
I will be leaving the list for quite some time, and indeed perhaps
permanently.
Good luck to you Robert.
Dan Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Feroze Kistan"
> I can't access the PUG, have been trying since yesterday but all I get is
> HTML and no pics. I'm waiting till it comes back on. Any ideas wahts
wrong?
> Feroze
Hi Feroze, We ran into this from time to time with a couple of viewers to
the gal
This one time, at band camp,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Raimo,
> Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He
I really dont give a toss about this thread, but just a small correction.
Iraq invaded Kuwait to stop the 'slant drilling' across the border into Iraqi
oil f
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 09:18 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
If this information is true it must mean that the KAF3 protocol is
embedded in upcoming models or in current ones.
Pål
I thought Sigma was on Pentax's sh*t list and had to reverse engineer
their lenses? I can't see Pentax's bene
Hi;
I might be interested, depending on a lot of variables. This is assuming
you'll let someone from Connecticut join in the fun
BUTCH
"Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself"
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
> And that's exactly what you posted. More anti-american nonsense from a
> non-thinking know-nothing. Mike couldn't BEAR the gun discussion. Poor
> baby. But all this mindless crap is okay, as long as it reflects one's
> own opinions.
Oh, I can bear the gun discussions, Paul. What I can't bear is
> Ahh, I started shooting seriously using SMC glass, I didn't know that you
> shouldn't shoot into the sun until I met some Canon and Nikon shooters :-)
Ditto here, but with Contax T* lenses.
--Mike
> Mike Johnston wrote a lengthy political opinion piece.
I did NOT write a "lengthy political opinion piece." I defended myself
against a bile-spewing, stupidly reasoned, invective-strewn post that
referred to me as "Baghdad Mike," called me a twit, and implied that I was
somehow (?) endangering
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 08:25 AM, CBWaters wrote:
I bought a new color cartridge for my Color 740 last weekend. I've
been
printing a lot this week, trying to figure out why all my prints look
washed-out. You may recall I was asking about color management. I've
printed about eight
Just moving onto zooms. Anyone thinking about the mechanics of a zoom
lens will have surely pondered that the lenshood of such an optic will
have to be a compromise. Now, if you have a 28-70 mm (say), then you will
have deduced that the(fixed plastic or metal) hood is really a 28mm hood
and nowhere
Hey, I apologize for that "stupidly reasoned" crack I just made.
Not appropriate.
--Mike
We're getting vindictive again. On of the strengths of this mailing list has
been it's international flavor and broad range of opinions. It's demeaning
to get to the point of childish name calling. I'm reminded of the old saying
" Opinions are like a**s, everyone has one, and they are most
appr
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 04:57 PM, Alan Chan wrote:
Imagine a cell phone with a "dial" instead of buttons. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
Cool
Dan Scott
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:27:50 -0600, you wrote:
>
>I want to put a hood on my FA 100/2.8 macro, 58mm filter thread (I get
>aperture ghosts that I don't want). Is there any rule of thumb that
>will give me the numbers to evaluate suitable hoods?
>
>Dan Scott
Someone on PDML mentioned a site which
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 07:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr Chan posted, among other things:
Except there is one difference. It doesn't matter how luxurious a
Toyota is,
it's still a Toyota to most people. In order to capture that market,
Toyota
invented another brand name called "
> > Mike Johnston wrote a lengthy political opinion piece.
>
>
> I did NOT write a "lengthy political opinion piece." I defended myself
> against a bile-spewing, stupidly reasoned, invective-strewn post that
> referred to me as "Baghdad Mike," called me a twit, and implied that I was
> somehow (?
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the communists
and I did not speak out because I was not a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the C
>
> On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 07:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Mr Chan posted, among other things:
> >> Except there is one difference. It doesn't matter how luxurious a
> >> Toyota is,
> >> it's still a Toyota to most people. In order to capture that market,
> >> Toyota
> >> inv
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 06:35 PM, William Robb wrote:
The NASA Space Shuttle Columbia appears to have broken up on re-entry
this
morning. The pictures I've seen are eerily similar to the Challenger
disaster we've all seen too many times.
This was the first space flight for an Isr
Mr Chan posted:
In order to capture that market,
> >> Toyota
> >> invented another brand name called "Lexus" which was believed to copy
> >> Benz
> >> in many ways. People don't think the brand PENTAX as a luxury brand,
> >> or
> >> professional as Canon or Nikon. In order to change the percept
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
