If they're anything like us, and why not, the chances are great
for disaster... One of us would end up being destroyed or the
planet seriously crippled.
Heck, this doesn't even require two species... (Look no further
than Terra Firma.)
Fred
I was gonna say M4.0 200, but you may be right. 4.0 200 of some
sort, would be my guess...
Perhaps. It just seemed to me that the diaphragm ring, which shows
knurled ridges all the way around (without a gap for the numerals)
looks K-ish to me. (My K 135/2.5 and my K 200/2.5 look that way.)
Not cool at all!
Katrin wrote:
the ad in germany is with a empty box of cigarettes... and
somehow I think that's not so cool... bye Katrin
Sci. Am had a special section on this a while back. (July 2000) My
favorite arguemnt involves assuming that a tehcnoogocial species arises,
sends one colony ship out at 0.1 c, it takes 400 years for that colonoy
to send out another ship, etc. Making these estimates, the entire
galaxy should be
Hi Jerome,
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:29:59 -0400, jerome wrote:
I couldn't imagine that one person could own the domain name with
the dubya's and another without. I suspect that the problem deals moreso with
the server than domain registration... but perhaps I'm wrong.
Whoever owns domain.com
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:42:46 -0400, jerome wrote:
Okay... even more specifically, I understand that Whether or not a site is
accessible without the preceding www depends on its DNS [domain name system]
setup. The better question is, how can this be changed? out of my hands? up to
the host?
I registered my domain about a year ago as jcoconnell.com
but if you type www.jcoconnell.com it works just the same.
I didnt pay extra for that feature or domain.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: jerome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everybody,
I guess that this is a message from the great beyond...
First of all, please visit http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/for_sale/items/ in
order to see my long list of items for sale. I will wait for 10-14
days, and will then sell all remaining items on eBay. Feel free to
group items
On June 1, 2003 07:56 am, Keith Whaley wrote:
I just did look it up. Thanks.
http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html
Redoing the existing formula's default parameters to some a bit less
optimistic, I come up with 200 possible communicating life forms within
OUR
Last night was my daughter's High School Senior Prom. I'm an old pro with
the PZ-1, but took out the PZ-1p that Stan sold me. Popped the AF500 flash on
it and proceeded to take pictures of the kids.
This is the first time that I have tried using the fill flash on the PZ-1p.
Results were
On June 1, 2003 08:14 am, Fred wrote:
I'm not sure I'm so eager to have the universe populated with
species such as ours (the most dangerous - and easily the most
destructive - species on this planet we call ours)...
Isn't that why it's ours? There is a quote in one of Niven's books
On June 1, 2003 08:19 am, frank theriault wrote:
First, one of the things that pisses me off about much sci fi that has to
do with ET's is that aliens always bear such a striking resemblence to us!
Cheaper to slap green make up on your local out of work actor then to come up
with
Quoting Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Within two hours of receiving the 10D, I was lucky to shoot
the following image:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/private/wood_warbler.jpg
wow... so wait... did the warbler come with the camera? g very nice image,
Boz! and best of luck with your Canon
Boz,
Sad for us to see you go and happy times for you.
The image is indeed impressive!
Thanks for the update.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/private/wood_warbler.jpg
On June 1, 2003 10:27 am, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Sci. Am had a special section on this a while back. (July 2000) My
favorite arguemnt involves assuming that a tehcnoogocial species arises,
sends one colony ship out at 0.1 c, it takes 400 years for that colonoy
to send out another ship, etc.
Frank wrote;
But, back to the question at hand. I'd say that you're limiting yourself
somewhat, Butch. You're assuming (it seems to me) that in order to be
intelligent, life has to follow a similar evolution to us. Why does all
life
have to be carbon based? Just because we can't imagine any
I'm actually of the view the Drake equation is too
pessimetic. It's too
human. Counting only plants like Earth.
One night on tv I saw a guy describing a hypothetical planet that
supported life. I was very curious as to what he would say, but he
proceeded to describe a planet...just
I like the second image. It has a real artsy feel about it. I suspect it
was cropped? Almost looks like its printed on a matte paper. Nice catch.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Barn Owl at 1000 ISO
Gotta have something as an antidote to
Yep, it's a K 200/4. ;-) (my outdoor portrait lens heheh).
And about the Asahi beer - it's very much like Pentax lens, after
testing it, you'll notice there's no IS. ;-)
cheers,
caveman
Fred wrote:
I was gonna say M4.0 200, but you may be right. 4.0 200 of some
sort, would be my guess...
Hey EktarEd,
Remember the words to the Eagles song Hotel
California?
You can check in anytime you like, but you can never
leave.
WELCOME TO THE PENTAX PDML.
Ryan Charron
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 06:18:26 -0700
From: EktarEd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Just what does it take
Every major technological change of some product (cameras, cars,
computers, etc.) has resulted in some significant number of mfg's of
that product, dropping that product. In the world of 35mm SLR's, a
number of makers dropped out when electronic based
AE/Program/engineering plastic SLR's came
Your point is well taken. See below for some thoughts...
Nick Zentena wrote:
On June 1, 2003 07:56 am, Keith Whaley wrote:
I just did look it up. Thanks.
http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html
Redoing the existing formula's default parameters to some a
At 04:53 PM 5/31/2003 +0200, you wrote:
I am happy, and now that I do not spend so much time on eBay, PDML or
KMP, I have lots of time to go shooting. I ordered the 10D immediately
after I learned that Pentax has delayed the *ist D. Within two hours of
receiving the 10D, I was lucky to shoot
Nick Zentena wrote:
On June 1, 2003 10:27 am, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Sci. Am had a special section on this a while back. (July 2000) My
favorite arguemnt involves assuming that a tehcnoogocial species arises,
sends one colony ship out at 0.1 c, it takes 400 years for that colonoy
Alan, I had to send mine to Pentax because of a loose front end. It
would slide back and forth. When it slid forward, focus was impossible.
It's now repaired, but this may be a weakness.
Joe
It's not without difficulty that I refrain now from more Pentax bashing,
especially re their lens line.
cheers,
caveman
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Alan, I had to send mine to Pentax because of a loose front end. It
would slide back and forth. When it slid forward, focus was impossible.
It's now
Sorry, but I just can't get excited by something that will happen in a
couple of hundred years, let along a few hundred thousand years.
In fact, in a few 10's of years it may not matter much anymore ANYhow,
and inside 50 years, most of US will be dead, so...
Thanks for the reminder on the Crystal
I'm not sure I'm so eager to have the universe populated with
species such as ours (the most dangerous - and easily the most
destructive - species on this planet we call ours)...
Isn't that why it's ours? There is a quote in one of Niven's books
Something like How much intelligence
Caveman,
So just what is your reasoning in Pentax bashing? Does it make you
feel good or something?
Any product or company can be bashed if one really wants to. Just
pick the right angle. I'm curious why you feel the need...
Bruce
Sunday, June 1, 2003, 10:31:10 AM, you wrote:
C It's not
På søndag, 1. juni 2003, kl. 20:28, skrev Keith Whaley:
Sorry, but I just can't get excited by something that will happen in a
couple of hundred years, let along a few hundred thousand years.
In fact, in a few 10's of years it may not matter much anymore ANYhow,
and inside 50 years, most of US
Cotty,
Just finished a re-read of Ringworld. I don't recall that quote. I'm
guessing it is in the second or third book. He is one of my favorite
authors too, especially when he teams up with Jerry Pournelle.
Bruce
Sunday, June 1, 2003, 11:32:19 AM, you wrote:
I'm not sure I'm so eager
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Caveman,
So just what is your reasoning in Pentax bashing? Does it make you
feel good or something?
Here it is on short. Any time I am pondering on getting an AF camera,
and I research what's there on the market, I always notice that the
Pentax offer is half-as**d, and
That one is very very well written!
Arnold
Bojidar Dimitrov schrieb:
Hello everybody,
I guess that this is a message from the great beyond...
First of all, please visit http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/for_sale/items/ in
order to see my long list of items for sale. I will wait for 10-14
days, and
Plugging in my numbers, I get 0..3, so the probability is that we don't
exist.
There are two factors that SETI never seems to look at.
1. What percentage of intelligent species ares paranoid (We don't want to
attract their attention, they are probably dangerous)?
2. Technology (already we are
På søndag, 1. juni 2003, kl. 22:01, skrev T Rittenhouse:
Plugging in my numbers, I get 0..3, so the probability is that we don't
exist.
There are two factors that SETI never seems to look at.
1. What percentage of intelligent species ares paranoid (We don't
want to
attract their attention, they
Actually, I believe, www is the name of the webserver. That is standard on
Unix type systems and will automatically fire up Apache (the standard
webserver deamon). You do not have to have a pointer on the Name Server, but
you do have to have one in the hosts file of the Unix system your the Name
Talk to one of the systems administrators. If you can't communicate with
them, you don't want to use their services anyway (believe me on this one).
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
You could map it to localhost.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: OT: websites with and without www
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:42:46
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: pentax-discuss-d Digest V03 #368
--
Content-Type: text/plain
pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 03 : Issue 368
Today's Topics:
RE: OT: The
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: pentax-discuss-d Digest V03 #367
--
Content-Type: text/plain
pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 03 : Issue 367
Today's Topics:
Re: Just what
I think if I were Boz I would have waited for the Pentax ist D to have
come out to see what it supported. Canon's D10 isn't going to disappear
soon. Nor will the USM or IS lenses that Canon makes. If the D wasn't to
his liking then he could sell all his Pentax stuff in favor of the Canon
A student from the high school I recently retired from went out with his
mentor from the local newspaper. The student used a Canon D30. Before his
outing he had always shot in AF with th3 D30, which is noted for not having
very good AF. The pro told him to use manual focus for a lot of his
Okay, I wasn't paying much attention back at the very start
of the web (I was still using gopher and archie on a text
terminal for a while before I discovered that text-only
web browsers existed) so I may have missed a memo, but my
understanding of the www. prefix on site names is this:
(Uh, if
What does ht AF performance of one camera have to do with the concept of AF?
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A student from the high school I recently retired from went out with his
mentor from the local newspaper. The student used a Canon D30. Before his
outing he had always shot in AF with th3
We just returned from this year's Grandfather Mountain Nature Photo Weekend.
Usual great time, but lousy and somewhat dangerous weather. Got to use a
600mm/f4.0. I'll send more info later after we can unpack and relax a
little.
Bill
Dunno. It's a nice to have option. Also all but some very special Pentax
current production lenses for 35mm cameras are AF. I just want to enter
a shop, check the gear, and buy it new, with 14 days return policy, 1
year guarantee and so on. Guess what. I usually can choose between a
nice
Thank Rob Joe! Guess I'll have it checked and see what they say.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
På søndag, 1. juni 2003, kl. 23:09, skrev Jim Apilado:
I think if I were Boz I would have waited for the Pentax ist D to
have
come out to see what it supported. Canon's D10 isn't going to
disappear
soon. Nor will the USM or IS lenses that Canon makes. If the D
wasn't to
his liking then he
Nothing?
The disadvantage of the existing concept of AF is that someone else
decided what part of the picture should be in focus, and making it
cumbersome to decide otherwise. That´s why I like to focus on the
screen, while composing the picture.
DagT
På søndag, 1. juni 2003, kl. 23:30,
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
My AF cameras allow me to
pick what spot I want in focus in a quick, easy fashion.
So does my MF camera. I turn a ring until the exact point I want comes
into focus.
The whole difference is that:
- with mf you have a really huge number of selection points, spread
across
Rob Studdert wrote:
Worse,
before it hits the shelves (if ever) Canon will have released (or pending) a
cheaper and better spec'd DSLR leaving the Pentax offering poor value at best.
They would do that if it was about Nikon upgrading the D100. I don't
think they are bothered anymore with what
When you've actually owned a modern AF Canon or Nikon for a few years,
come back and tell us about the results. Right now you're just blowing
smoke out your ass.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- with af you have a small number of selection point, grouped near the
image center; the accuracy is
It takes me 5 minutes to check where the AF focus points on the modern
AF Canon or Nikon are. If you need a few years for noticing where they
are, then you're probably thinking slower than my smoke blowin' a**.
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
When you've actually owned a modern AF Canon or Nikon for a
Well, I'll say this much: i'm a teenager,
and just got a
super program
(on the cheap) as an upgrade to my mom's a3000. Works fine for me.
Maybe pentax should just try updating the zx-m/mz-m to have a few (not
too many!) more features. They've
Not that I will jump ship, but we all know there won't be any Pentax
USM/IS/AF-TC anytime soon. Even if the upcoming *ist D will be an impressive
product or even a big hit, as a system, Pentax is still way behind Canon
EOS. So for those who need these technology, it makes sense to switch asap.
The new Minolta lenses have been delayed due to the shortage of parts too.
So I guess it's might actually be the case.
regards,
Alan Chan
Wasn't it, firstly, touted as a late spring release? Then, summer. Now
August.
Yeah, right. And then, to blame it on suppliers. Are any other DSLR
They would do that if it was about Nikon upgrading the D100. I don't think
they are bothered anymore with what Pentax is doing.
Unless Pentax had fooled us all and released a 11MP *istD at the price of
10D this fall, then everyone would start to panic.
regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.canon.com/finance/conf2003q1/p06.html
http://www.canon.com/finance/conf2003q1/p10.html
http://www.canon.com/finance/conf2003q1/p11.html
I remember someone stating that they sell cameras at a loss (just for
annoying Nikon) ???
cheers,
caveman
Cotty,
I can also detect two UFO's in the first image, above and to the left of
the owl. What's that ? Dust on the sensor ?
cheers,
caveman
Cotty wrote:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/digital/owlat1000iso.html
Yup,dust.I'd know that spec
Yes, there's a world wide shortage of sand, plastic, aluminum and screws.
cheers,
caveman
Alan Chan wrote:
The new Minolta lenses have been delayed due to the shortage of parts
too. So I guess it's might actually be the case.
Hello,
A question for digital darkroom users who do printing frequently ...
what is the cost of the print for say 8*10 size ?
Of course, it will vary depending on printer, paper and inks and that is
what I am trying to figure out.
I have a HP PC and 932 printer. The ink-set costs around
What bothers me (recently) is that with all the Pentax FA lenses that I have
purchased lately, picking the perfect one was like buying a lottery. I am
sure you guys are sick of hearing me complaining about the FA*200/2.8 that I
purchased late last year. And now my friend purchased a FA31/1.8
Well, it's always worth to wait a while, at least before the dust
settles, especially in the digital arena (hopefully on other's people
CCDs ;-). Otherwise you may do like Bruce, who jumped from Pentax to
Nikon and now is biting his fingers.
Alan Chan wrote:
Not that I will jump ship, but we
Well, it's always worth to wait a while, at least before the dust settles,
especially in the digital arena (hopefully on other's people CCDs ;-).
Otherwise you may do like Bruce, who jumped from Pentax to Nikon and now is
biting his fingers.
Of course, he should jump to Canon in the 1st place.
Ed,
Woull you PLEASE stop sending all the messages you've ever received
along with your new reply?
Thanks, keith whaley
EktarEd wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: pentax-discuss-d Digest V03
There were 3 pro nature photographers at Grandfather Mountain this weekend.
All 3 said Epson, Epson and Epson.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Anand DHUPKAR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: OT - digital darkroom - printing...
Hello,
Alan Chan wrote:
What bothers me (recently) is that with all the Pentax FA lenses that I
have purchased lately, picking the perfect one was like buying a
lottery. I am sure you guys are sick of hearing me complaining about the
FA*200/2.8 that I purchased late last year.
I'm fresh audience (I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty/Cave,i have dust on my CCD i cannot blow off,possibly due to the filmsome websites
talk about
on the CCD.
I have several times parked my car under a f*** species of trees that
covered it in no time with a sticky something that I had a really hard
time to remove.
which only confirms Bruce's statement. do you think pilots on a commercial plane take
minutes to scan the lights to know they are OK?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 19:48
Subject: Re: Pentax bashing (was Re:
There's a dirty joke in there somewhere... vbg
-frank
Caveman wrote:
Yes, there's a world wide shortage of sand, plastic, aluminum and screws.
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
I can't imagine what Minolta might be having shipping problems with in terms of
parts for lenses, that might also affect Pentax with dslr bodies.
Whatever, it may well be that a supplier of, say, digital sensors, is having
supply problems. If they can only ship, for example, 50% of their orders,
Pentax will say it's manually assembled so that's normal and it is within
factory specs etc.
Sounds familiar. :-)
I'd say replace the screws with new good lookin' ones and put it on e-bay
;-)
Unfortunately, they don't have the screws in Canada. :-(
regards,
Alan Chan
Pentax isn't making much money on used K1000's and MX's these days.
a proud MX owner,
frank (god, I'm in a grouchy mood tonight! g)
Daniel Liu wrote:
snip They've already got the niche for students.
Most i know use either that or the k1000, one lucky girl i know uses an
mx and won't touch
I think there's a dirty joke in ~there~, too!
-frank
Alan Chan wrote:
Unfortunately, they don't have the screws in Canada. :-(
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
How is this related to what I was saying ? Ok, here it is, explained
again: it takes only 5 minutes to get to the specs of these cameras,
including pics of the viewfinder, in which you can obviously detect the
number and spatial position of the focusing points. If you need to buy
the camera
I sent him a personal email telling him how to unsubscribe, you on the other
hand just reposted his message including the entire digest. That is the
whole problem with public complaints about other peoples posts. He was a
newby in trouble, what is your excuse?
Ciao,
Graywolf
millions? i can believe tens of thousands.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 20:49
Subject: Re: Hello and lots and lots for sale
Whatever the case may be, I find it hard to believe that with millions
I, and at least two others, replied on PDML to his complaint yesterday, giving
pretty explicite instructions as to how to unsub, FWIW.
I'm just in a bitchy mood tonight, and felt like whining. Thanks for that
vbg.
-frank
T Rittenhouse wrote:
I sent him a personal email telling him how to
Frank, it looks like you're in a dirty mood this evening ;-)
frank theriault wrote:
I think there's a dirty joke in ~there~, too!
-frank
Alan Chan wrote:
Unfortunately, they don't have the screws in Canada. :-(
regards,
Alan Chan
Since I'm still using film, I would makes the same choice today that I
made in 1999 and go with Nikon. Being able to use one set of lenses on
AF (useful AF) and MF bodies is still a primary issue for me. It's mot
that I can't get a decent DSLR in Nikon mount either. Now, if I were
buying stock
Oh boy...!
regards,
Alan Chan
I think there's a dirty joke in ~there~, too!
Unfortunately, they don't have the screws in Canada. :-(
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
Alan,
I made my switch, but it was for a bigger negative and Pentax had the
system I needed/wanted - not Nikon or Canon.
Bruce
Sunday, June 1, 2003, 4:56:05 PM, you wrote:
AC Not that I will jump ship, but we all know there won't be any Pentax
AC USM/IS/AF-TC anytime soon. Even if the
I hereby nominate this for the Understatement of the Year Award
still grouchy,
frank
Caveman wrote:
snip. I don't
think they are bothered anymore with what Pentax is doing.
cheers,
caveman
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it
is true. -J.
Dirty and grouchy! Sometimes that's a good combination, if the conditions are
right (which they aren't vbg).
-frank
Caveman wrote:
Frank, it looks like you're in a dirty mood this evening ;-)
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears
it is true. -J.
Which tells you nothing about real world, day in day out usage. Since I
take pictures with cameras, and not spec sheets, pictures of viewfinders
don't tell me what I need to know. This is why I tend to agree with
folks that think someone has to use a camera for 6 months before they
can make
On June 1, 2003 08:49 pm, frank theriault wrote:
supplier to meet their needs somewhere. It's a real credibility problem
when Sigma and Fuji, and other smaller manufacturers have had a dslr on the
market for some time.
Fuji is small?
Nick
Frank wrote;
Yeah, right. And then, to blame it on suppliers. Are any other DSLR
manufacturers saying there'll be shortage of product in the near future due
to
supply problems? I haven't heard anything...
Actually I believe Fuji announced a cutback of production due to supply
problems. Check
I'm covering two topics with one message here. I'm trying a new gallery
service called smugmug and have posted a couple of small collections to see
how the service works.
One of the galleries is a few sample shots from the first few days after I
bought my Optio S. The Optio gallery is set up
Going through PUG many times today, I decided to check on upcoming
themed months, just to start thinking about things.
What does the II in Black and White II mean for August? Does it
merely mean that there was a BW I some time in the distant past, and
this is the second installment, so to speak?
You're right.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
What about film? Fuji sells alot and Canon never made ANY.
JCO
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
Hi JCO,
This is one of those very rarely mentioned lens here. Could you give us
some comments on its character and performance ? (now, or after the
auction closes, as you preffer).
cheers,
caveman
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
SMC Pentax 45-125mm F4 Zoom Lens, K mount$109.99
$149.99
I actually considered getting a zx-m when I bought my first camera body.
I think about the only features it really needs is better matrix
metering, and TTL flash, to be a killer MF body. Essentially, a ZX-5n
without autofocus.
-Mat
Maybe pentax should just try updating the zx-m/mz-m to have a
Stuart, Frank job well done for both of you!
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Yes, Herb , many, many minutes. Commercial flight today demands very, very
little of the pilot during the majority of the autopilot controlled flight.
It's almost as though the pilot's only job is to get the aircraft off the
ground and land the thing. Both activities involve time consuming
Well since I'm selling extra one ( I'm keeping 2, both the screwmount
and the K mount) my opinion might be tainted huh?
Anyway, I find it excellent both optically and mechanically
but it's a little difficult to focus at 45mm due to speed so
you need to zoom out to 125 first to focus. Other than
Brendan,
I concur. On my Canon, HP, and Epsons, 8X10's would cost in the $2-$3
range. That is reasonable as a lab print would cost about $6.50 each.
I found that 8X10's were cost effective (provided you don't have to
reprint - color problems, lightness, etc) but 4X6's are iffy compared
to lab
Keith,
Just try to ignore it, he's attempting to terrorize
us.
Ryan
Ed,
Would you PLEASE stop sending all the messages you've
ever received
along with your new reply?
Thanks, keith whaley
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync
Mat Maessen wrote:
I actually considered getting a zx-m when I bought my first camera body.
I think about the only features it really needs is better matrix
metering, and TTL flash, to be a killer MF body. Essentially, a ZX-5n
without autofocus.
I'd say:
-I can easily live with just center
Quelles sorts des reves? Seche ou moite?
Je crois que tous mes reves avec la rousse sont jolies (comme elle)!
tgs
-le knarf
Caveman wrote:
Je te souhaite des jolis reves avec la belle rousse ;-)
Bonne nuit,
caveman
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
It's mot
that I can't get a decent DSLR in Nikon mount either.
What else would you say...
cheers,
caveman
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
