>
> 2. Does anyone else know of a head that would be suitable for my main
> purpose? The problem with the 3265 is that it's not rated for this
> massive of a lens, and when I try and position anything in the
> viewfinder it slips away when I let it go . . .
Tha's odd - I've found that head t
Ok. Then I'll go back in May to take a more cliché photo. So I can submit in
June under the "cliché" theme!
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My PAW week 3 - Sunflowers
Different vie
Hi Herb, John
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:29:03 -0500, Herb Chong wrote:
>they aren't using the code unmodified. for one thing, they have access to
>the Pentax proprietary information by working with Pentax. those fields that
>you couldn't decode would have been disclosed to Adobe.
I am pretty sure th
Different views are unacceptable. You'll have to return and
make a more cliché photo.
Andy Chang wrote:
>
> http://unlimited.name/cpg/albums/userpics/10008/normal_06.jpg
> But I thought that there are plenty of pictures of blooming flowers, so a
> different view may be interesting.
http://unlimited.name/cpg/albums/userpics/10008/normal_06.jpg
This is my week 3 PAW entry. This one is taken not long ago at a family trip
with Pentax MZ50.
We came across some flower fields but most of the flowers were gone so there
is no "sea" of flowers to take.
But I thought that there are
Cotty wrote:
>
> >> >>I suppose Cotty would scoff
> >>
> >> C> Whenever I can.
> >>
> >> Pardon me, but what is scoff?
> >
> >It has two meanings:
> >1. to eat greedily
> >2. to mock
> >
> >Now, which one do you think Cotty was meaning??
> >
> >mike
>
> I would just like to grasp this opportu
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "mike wilson"
> Subject: Re: Camera shake (was The A-2XS and A 400/5.6)
>
> >
> > Cheeky git. We'll send someone over to feel your bum.
> >
> >
> Cotty's got a friend who you could send over.
Your wish is our command. 8-)
frank theriault wrote:
> A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of
> advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot lots". I would like to
> change it to, "have a camera with you". I'm not sure if anyone else said
> this (if you did, my apologies - I didn't notic
Good Show!
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
The Newspaper deadline I was talking about? I got a front page
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
You guys sure are slow, when I said, "Have the damn camera with you" in response
to that thread, everybody thought I was being silly. Now you are all agreeing
with me. Oh well, at least you are learning.
Of course there is something there for me to think about. 20 years ago an MX
lived hanging
Darn, no one ever gave me a Super Technika. I did have one once, miss it to this
day. Your dad should have fun with it. Though from the photo you need to tell
him about leveling the camera (grin). Also it would be nice if you could get him
to take it off that tripod. 4x5 the next to the best sna
My understanding from the area Pentax Rep is that Pentax no longer warehouses
things. They come off the assembly line, are shipped to the distribution center
in the Philippines, and are shipped out directly to dealers from distributors
orders. Usually within 24 hours or so. That kind of means th
The M150/3.5 ... some here are not satisfied with it, others
(Wheatfield Willie?) and myself think it's pretty darned
good. I like mine quite a bit (although, unlike you, I
don't test my lenses against one another and I don't look
for ultimate sharpness, as you appear to). However, those
that kno
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
> During the day I got phone calls from 3 separate newspapers looking for
> my pics. So, I happily emailed them off, not asking for any $$ as I had
> already been paid by the Mining Union and it was only like 15 minutes
> work. It would have been
You might want to look for a K150mm F4.0 same optical formula as the
Takumar.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiousity, can anyone speak from experience about the
relative optical performance of the K30/2.8 and the FA limited 31?
The 31 is of course faster, and has A and AF functions, plu
Ask me again in a month. My 30mm and 31mm will be reunited,
if only for a few days, and this time I WILL take some
comparison shots.
Stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiousity, can anyone speak from experience about the
relative optical performance of the K30/2.8 and the FA limited 3
A great example.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Rule #1: always have a camera with you.
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/strange-scene.jpg
Just out of curiousity, can anyone speak from experience about the
relative optical performance of the K30/2.8 and the FA limited 31?
The 31 is of course faster, and has A and AF functions, plus you can
buy one pretty much any time from NY dealers. I'd be tempted, but
I've got a K30 and my tests
I hadn't joined in the PUG discussion because until tonight I hadn't had
a chance to look at it. Now that I have looked at it a couple of things
struck me as interesting.
Most of the pictures use prime lenses, primarily in the 50-85mm focal
length range. They are almost all framed very tight. M
Rule #1: always have a camera with you.
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/strange-scene.jpg
Hi!
Congratulations!
Boris
That's just the point Shel, I understand this all too well. I seldom
make photographs of
close friends/family etc.,since I cannot emotionally divorce myself, the
shots all look terrible
after the fact. A good photographer learns to discard the bad and keep
the good. That's
the most difficult
That's one cute kitty ;-))
Butch Black wrote:
>
> Here is a link to the image I was going to submit. Consider it this weeks
> PAW.
>
> http://www.usefilm.com/image/319927.html
>
Howdy again,
I need some advice from the crowd again. I'm contemplating
purchasing a new tripod head, but want to see what everyone says first.
First off, my current tripod head is the Bogen 3265. I think it's
refered to as the pistol grip ball head. It suits most of my needs for
ligh
Thanks for the kind words Lon. I was originally going to submit another
image but this one kept calling out to me. It is the color that makes this
shot IMHO.
Here is a link to the image I was going to submit. Consider it this weeks
PAW.
http://www.usefilm.com/image/319927.html
Mostly unmanipulat
The Newspaper deadline I was talking about? I got a front page
I got home from Brisbane at midnight on Sunday night - there was a message
waiting for me from some Mining Union guy, asking if I could attend a picket
line and industrial dispute the following morning (yesterday).
I was to phot
Hi Everyone!
This is a quick one for me as I am working to deadlines and I am extremely
rushed.
I will be sure to come back later and post properly, but I just felt really
rude as you have all been making such lovely comments about my PUG shot.
I too love the shot, and Frank, it was the freakin'
Love this shot Mark!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 1 March 2004 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW beacuse I missed the PUG
I didn't get my portrait shot in to the PUG by deadline so I'll present
it as a PAW image.
http://ww
Robert,
Most definitely must enjoy the southern hospitality. Maybe that is why I
have hung around here so long...
And did not have my reskinned cameras. This was before my LXen were
'snaked'. Yes, that may be hard to believe... Probably did not have a
camera with me since it was just a party
Frank,
I almost was tempted to attempt my version of this. But I am sure that I
will forget someone along the way. I am terrible with names.
Let me just say I have met PDMLers at:
Baltimore
DCPDML
NYCPDML
San Antonio, Texas
Salt Lake City, Utah
Gra
I used to work out of North White Sands Missile Range on and off for a
couple of years. I only made it out to the national park twice. This was
probably during the first year of my having a 35mm camera. I recall having
exposure problems. I need to try to see if I can go back to find that
roll..
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 4:25 PM
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Altoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Stan,
>
> You have managed to pick the one weekend that we don't have
> anything planned.
For those of you you do
> frank theriault wrote:
>
> > A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of
> > advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot lots". I would like to
> > change it to, "have a camera with you". I'm not sure if anyone else said
> > this (if you did, my apologies - I
John Mustarde said, among many other things:
> I've been holding off on XP for a long time
> because I didn't want the TeleTubbies interface.
Dude, I trust that's not your main reason! The interface can be changed!
Incidentally, in response to the part I didn't quote -- how about a card
reade
I was looking for a quote that came to me from a friend that
says it better than I ever could. She wrote:
I like it when photography can zero in on shapes
and forms and reintroduce us to ordinary things.
Not focus so much on "what it is" but on it's
qualities, character, an
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:37:21 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
>> Don't be afraid to ship to Canada, just don't ship UPS.
>
>Actually, all the UPS horror stories only applies for UPS GROUND shipping.
>If you ship by UPS Express or Expedited, there is NO brokerage fe
Totally disagree ... most photographers are not good editors
of their own work. Often they have too much emotion
involved in their photographs.
shel
"Peter J. Alling" wrote:
>
> Be your own editor.
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> >Hi Frank ... I guess that's a version of F8 and be there
> >;-)
Hi Frank ...
Thanks ... it was a fun afternoon making a number of shots
of the workings of the piano, trying to find more than what
was obvious.
At least it's not sharp all over, eh
But I have to admit, while I think this ~might~ have been a
stronger image had it been sharper, there are lots o
Albano,
Sorry, I forgot you have only been back with us for a few weeks. I guess
you missed the long discussion we had about shooting moving cars at night
using fill flash with trailing curtain sync. I was just trying to make a
joke. I didn't really mean your shot needed it. Sorry for the
Be your own editor.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Frank ... I guess that's a version of F8 and be there
;-))
But what might the second rule be?
shel
frank theriault wrote:
A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of
advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot
Thanks for the comment, Albano. I'm glad you liked it.
At the risk of being immodest, it was one of those shots that once I took
it, I couldn't wait to get it developed, to see if it turned out the way I
hoped; I was pleased that it did! Since it was a one shot deal, I knew I
couldn't go bac
Hi Frank ... I guess that's a version of F8 and be there
;-))
But what might the second rule be?
shel
frank theriault wrote:
> A couple of months ago, someone asked what our first and best piece of
> advice would be for tyros. I think I said, "shoot lots". I would like to
> change it to, "
not to mention that some of the most interesting waterfalls are shaded most
of the time.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: PAW - Hershey's Rapids
> It's an effect borne from ne
On 1/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I think Cotty is spending too much time at the Scoff and Quaff.
>WW
Thanks Bill - there's tears rolling down my cheeks. best laugh I've had
in days...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| http://www.maca
they aren't using the code unmodified. for one thing, they have access to
the Pentax proprietary information by working with Pentax. those fields that
you couldn't decode would have been disclosed to Adobe.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
>> I think, just to ensure absolute clarity, I will refer to all focal
>> lengths as they work on the 4x5 format, since that is as good a
>> reference standard as anything.
>> At least me, Rittenhouse and Hodgson will have a clue.
>> Don't know about the rest of you lot though.
>
>Cheeky git. We
Lon,
Thanks for the kind comment, I glad you liked 'Kelly'.
--
Fred Widall
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
--
Not easily frightened?
Au contraire! Those suckers will snap off your fingers if you get too
close.
But, I think I've said enough about these vicious vermin, who are not
Canadian (did I mention that?).
He's right, though, Paul. You nailed the exposure.
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks thi
I hate these critters.
They poop all over our parks and green spaces. They're cranky and hiss at
you and chase you if you get too close. If you're having a picnic, and they
discover you have food, they become very aggressive and literally chase you
away from your picnic table.
Not only that,
Sadly you don't need lurid content for it to be construed as "kiddy porn".
frank theriault wrote:
I more or less agree with Marnie WRT "Homeless at Rose Bay". He could
any old guy sleeping at any place. Or, he could just have shut his
eyes when you snapped. To me there's no context here. I'
I think for 1. you mean "scarfed", not "scoffed". Always wanted to scoff at your
scarfing, Cotty (grin). Of course in Britain, words are often twisted into
strange meanings.
--
Cotty wrote:
I suppose Cotty would scoff
C> Whenever I can.
Pardon me, but what is scoff?
Boris
Two meanings tha
I really like this shot. I love the framing and the composition. The
minimal depth of field with the focus perfectly placed makes it very
special. And of course a beautiful woman doesn't hurt :-). Nice work.
Paul
Boris said:
>Why is it so customary to shot a flowing water at very slow shutter
>speed as if to get this kind of effect?
>Here for example this works brilliantly. But I've seen quite many
>images where going to medium fast shutter speed getting (almost)
>sharp, frozen water would be way better.
Sounds about the way US law can be interpreted. Some states are harsher
than Federal.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: PAW
On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:20, William Robb wrote:
I was thinking that as well when I looked.
That picture may well be
Ah yes, my M50/1.7 is a 200mm effective focal length. My Vivitar 24/2.0 is a
100mm effective, and my 100 is a 400 effective. I especially like my 80-200
which is a 320-800 effective. Your 50mm on your *ist is a 300mm efective.
Wow! Hey if we use 8x10 we can double them. Then my 80-200 is a 640 t
A word in a two-bit dictionary. Sorry, hard to pass up a good straight line.
--
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I suppose Cotty would scoff
C> Whenever I can.
Pardon me, but what is scoff?
Boris
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not goi
Again, playing catch-up with PAWs.
Love this one, Fred. Those old Spotties and Taks are capable of taking
wonderful shots. Of course, they have to be in the hands of skilled
photographers, at opportune moments like this to do their stuff.
Just beautiful.
thanks,
frank
"The optimist thinks th
There is hope that this winter will end...
Beautiful shot, Bill.
thanks,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Nice to see your critical pixels here, Frank ;-))
I was about to post a similar comment ...
Although it's not ~necessary~ to see the eyes, the eyes
often complete, if not tell, the story. That's something of
a generalization, but it's also something to consider each
time one presses the shutter
Hi, David,
Don't know what everyone else said. I'm at the point where I'm trying to
catch up on PAWs that are a few days old, and I'm just deleting the
responses unread.
So, first, lovely shot. If you've been lurking here for a bit, you'll know
that there are several amazing bug and bird guy
Thanks for the comment, Lon.
And, I agree with you. Boris has an unfair advantage, shooting such a
beautiful child!!
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECT
Always pushing the envelope, eh Albano?
I like it. I don't know what one might do with it, but there are many
possibilities. I do know that I like it. Looks like an old Ford Falcon.
The colours look just about right. I know you were leaning against the
wall, but that's still amazing for 10
Works fine on Pocket IE on PPC.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Shel Belinkoff"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 29/02/04 02:46:49
To: "PDML"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Testing the QuikSnap® Page
I've just put up the start of the QuikSnap® web page and I'd
like s
Terrific comp, beautiful colours, I like the bokeh.
Lovely shot. Thanks, Bob.
Hope you can hold a "real" camera soon...
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [E
Hey, that's Union Station! I see that every day. Cool!
I agree with Shel, the colour one has more impact. Maybe it's all
psychological, but once I know that a colour photo has been desaturated to
b&w, it just doesn't work. If I'm not told? I probably wouldn't notice.
But, that being said,
>In a message dated 3/1/2004 2:44:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>So, about the photo. I think you did a great job of capturing her beautiful
smile! The lifting of the dress is clearly an impish gesture, probably
designed to get a reaction from the nearby parent. Every
Me too.
Thanks, guys. As always, a job well done. I'll buy you both drinks @
GFM...
-frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Again, thank the two of you for hel
I more or less agree with Marnie WRT "Homeless at Rose Bay". He could any
old guy sleeping at any place. Or, he could just have shut his eyes when
you snapped. To me there's no context here. I'm not necessarily saying (as
I think Marnie did) that there should be more visual cues of his
surr
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: PAW
> On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:20, William Robb wrote:
>
> > I was thinking that as well when I looked.
> > That picture may well be kiddie porn under Canada's laws.
>
> Talk about anal, a similar thread scared my baby sister off the
lis
I think Cotty is spending too much time at the Scoff and Quaff.
WW
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: PAW - Hershey's Rapids
>
>
> >>>I suppose Cotty would scoff
> >
> >C> Whenever I can.
> >
> >Pardon me, but what is scoff?
> >
> >Boris
>
> Two meanings that I know of with
>> >>I suppose Cotty would scoff
>>
>> C> Whenever I can.
>>
>> Pardon me, but what is scoff?
>
>It has two meanings:
>1. to eat greedily
>2. to mock
>
>Now, which one do you think Cotty was meaning??
>
>mike
I would just like to grasp this opportunity to thank the honourable
gentleman from
Oh yeah.
Well, Pat, I said I knew I was missing a couple of people. Evidently, you
were one of them.
Sorry about that. Pat is not Chopped Liver. Just to set the record
straight.
Hey, you haven't seen my LX yet, have you Pat? Ooo. Aaaahh.
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks thi
On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:20, William Robb wrote:
> I was thinking that as well when I looked.
> That picture may well be kiddie porn under Canada's laws.
Talk about anal, a similar thread scared my baby sister off the list a few
years back. You may recall the discussion Bill, something about photogra
Hi,
>>I suppose Cotty would scoff
C> Whenever I can.
> Pardon me, but what is scoff?
>
if you scoff your food it means you eat it quickly and greedily.
Cheers,
Bob
oh, and also, if you scoff at something it means you think it's
ridiculous or inadequate.
>> >Well my friends, thank you both very much for the appreciation!
>> >Hope to meet you again in London (or anywhere else we'll be able
>> >to have the PDML meeting) in Spring.
>>
>> Hang on now mate - this one's going to be a Beer Meeting. PDML comes a
>> close second on this occasion ;-)
>
>Th
>>>I suppose Cotty would scoff
>
>C> Whenever I can.
>
>Pardon me, but what is scoff?
>
>Boris
Two meanings that I know of without looking in the dictionary, Boris.
1. Scoff as in eat a lot of food: 'he scoffed it all down like a greedy pig.'
and
2. Scoff as in turn your nose up: 'he scoffe
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2176214&size=lg
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, mike wilson wrote:
> There are plenty of sale options for those who wish to purchase. I was
> merely letting people know of another. No need for contempt.
Sorry, no contempt at you, just shocked about the low price already.
It is a low price, despite the issues you mentioned
On 1/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Well my friends, thank you both very much for the appreciation!
>Hope to meet you again in London (or anywhere else we'll be able
>to have the PDML meeting) in Spring.
Hang on now mate - this one's going to be a Beer Meeting. PDML comes a
close second on t
On 1/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Anyway: what I mean is that we should try to free ourselves from
>conventions and that we shouldn´t sit back and say "I can´t do this".
>Most of us can.
I agree. Let me rephrase my original message from:
>> I wish I could do shots like that.
to:
I w
Thanks Lon.
I don't think the cheeks got boosted to be honest, they look nice, don't
they?
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 14:21, Lon Williamson wrote:
> The two keepers here, are, in my opinion, "Olivia"
> by Christian Skofteland, and "Zoopportunity"
> by Frits J. Wüthrich.
>
> Olivia's shot is "how I
Perspective (foreshortening, etc.) is determined entirely by the camera's
position in relation to the subject matter and is independent of format or
lens choice. How much "shake you can take" is entirely determined by the
geometry involved. The geometry that's important is the ratio of the focal
le
http://www.icp.org/weegee/images/wg1-7.jpg
David Madsen wrote:
>
> I loved the idea of PAW, so after two weeks I have finally added a PAW page
> to my site. Direct link is http://davidmadsen.com/paw.htm. This week is a
> fire hydrant that I photographed thinking that I would do a series of
> hy
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: PAW
> Yep, its photos like that which have people up in arms. These days
here in the
> US both the mom, and Chris could wind up in jail for taking
pictures like that.
> Heck you can almost get arrested for carrying a camera around in a
- Original Message -
From: "Lawrence Kwan"
Subject: Re: OT:shipping to Canada
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
> > > Actually, all the UPS horror stories only applies for UPS
GROUND
> > > shipping. If you ship by UPS Express or Expedited, there is NO
> > > brokerage fees, it i
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Clark"
Subject: Camera shake (was The A-2XS and A 400/5.6)
> I'm still not sure about this. While I agree that on the first
image i.e. the sensor or film the effect will be the same as for the
800mm lens, as the enlargement to a same sized print is great
Hi Dave ...
Fire hydrants are nice, but y'know, some close-up or macro
work on the details may have more impact than a hydrant just
standing there. Have you though about getting real close,
or maybe staking out a hydrant waiting for the local pup to
make his rounds?
shel
David Madsen wrote:
>
Steve,
Interesting portrait . . . what's that "halo thingie" to the right
of her head? What alumni magazine was this, the subject sounds
interesting to me.
IL Bill
On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I guess I messed up with my PUG submission. It was this
http:/
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
> > Actually, all the UPS horror stories only applies for UPS GROUND
> > shipping. If you ship by UPS Express or Expedited, there is NO
> > brokerage fees, it is included.
>
> Well, no. It doesn't.
> At least not in my experience.
It DOES include brokerage
Yep, its photos like that which have people up in arms. These days here in the
US both the mom, and Chris could wind up in jail for taking pictures like that.
Heck you can almost get arrested for carrying a camera around in a park where
kids are these days. Sure it is stupid, but that is the way
I guess I messed up with my PUG submission. It was this
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardi/
This image was actually not heavily manipulated. It is sharpened a bit
and solarized using the filter in Picture Publisher, but this effect can
be done in a darkroom as well. It was the picture in the alumn
When I was in India a couple of years ago we did the tourist thing for a
day and went to the Taj Mahal. Most of the other visitors were Indian
families, and *every single father* was taking forced-perspective shots
of his kids "picking up" the Taj. So this was my "homage" to cheesy
tourist sh
Wow, sounds like a lot more food than we had! Gotta love the southern
tradition of using the smallest excuse for having a feast huh? This is
especially true for barb-e-ques down in south Texas. We always make
enough to feed the whole town, despite the fact that we have leftovers
for the rest
>
> 2) only Adobe reads the RAW image and interpolates to the monitor with the
> correct color normalization. the Pentax software reads the preview JPEG.
> everyone else seems to not apply the camera-specific normalization.
I'm not sure even Adobe is doing that. I believe the photoshop code is
u
I'm still not sure about this. While I agree that on the first image i.e. the sensor
or film the effect will be the same as for the 800mm lens, as the enlargement to a
same sized print is greater for the *istD compared to the 35mm film camera, you are
also enlarging the shake which will then be
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The two keepers here, are, in my opinion, "Olivia"
> by Christian Skofteland, and "Zoopportunity"
> by Frits J. Wüthrich.
>
> Olivia's shot is "how I spent my summer vacation"
> and Zooportunity, though shot at a zoo, l
In a message dated 3/1/2004 2:42:47 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> From: Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> http://www.elvum.net/gallery/paw/33_london_eye
I find this very interesting. Not totally sure I LIKE it. It bothers me that
the ferris wheel is leaning (bothers
> At 07:58 AM 2/28/2004 +,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >The 55 is next on my list.I have the 90 LS and the SMC200 F4 now.The 200
> >is very sharp,i
> >find.
> >I bought a set of tubes too and cannot wait to try them out.
Then Mark said>>>
>
> Ironi
Larry Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a
Nikon Coolpix 5700
> before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this
area again
> with the "D".
>
> Comments welcome.
>
> http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65384/1/2589664/Origina
Nah, mine blocks everything unless or until it is configured it to let
it through.
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 March 2004 17:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Color-cast viewing *ISTD RAW images in BreezeBrowser
>
>
>
> - O
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
