On Aug 27, 2004, at 4:34 AM, Caveman wrote:
Nice pic, but LOL here's how Dave goes digital just because of the
incompetent printing industry.
I have some bad news for you. Their machines will still correct
exposure all even when printing from a file. Bwahahaha. I hate'em.
The D-Lab kiosk that
Well actually yes, the LP12 I used did have a top notch pickup cartridge,
etc. No discernable difference in quality. Too close to call.
A.
On 27/8/04 1:41 am, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all a LINN LP12 is no where near
the the current state of the art and unless
you
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Don Sanderson wrote:
Jostein what's the size in MM (or inches) of A2/A3?
A4210 x 297 mm 8.3 x 11.7 in
A3297 x 420 mm11.7 x 16.5 in
A2420 x 594 mm16.5 x 23.4 in
A4 is the standard sheet of writing, copy etc paper in this part of the
world. A3 is the
Jostein wrote:
So I got curious. I asked a pro-lab in Oslo to go as large as _they_
considered reasonable quality, and told them the file was from a 6
Mpix DSLR. They print on a Epson Pro 9600. What I got back was an A2
enlargement. At this size, it was easy to spot the blurring of details
GI The same here in Italy: dia, short for diapositiva. The word
GI invertibile (reversible) too was common, at least in a recent
GI past.
Dia seems universal in Europe, from diapositive. Only the strange US
must use the term slides... It doesn't make sense, what is slid where ;-) ?
What about
Thursday, August 26, 2004, 11:54:47 AM, Lon wrote:
LW Anyone wanna tell me how to stuff a dry plate into an MX?
Let me think... that would be around 1/16 size plate, wouldn't it?
I will check with my drogist, if he stocks these. Would you like
orthochromatic, the latest fancy, or good old
HI Chad, welcome to the list!
Sorry I can't help you with the seals, but some other list members should be able to
give you advice.
With that kit you are well prepared to get going in photography.
Please report how the restoration goes/went.
Good luck!
Thanks,
Lasse
From: Chad Kealey [EMAIL
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsinclude=0userid=dpconsult.comrows=50since=-1rd=1
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
-
'Every one of us is, even from his mother's womb, a master craftsman of idols.'
-- John Calvin (1509-64)
Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OMG, you must be the only person I know with such a tidy office!
Ooh, I'm gonna have to print that out and show it to Lisa! She's
constantly on about what a mess it is.
You don't even have any drawing on the walls, or yoghurt mashed into your
Still use a Weston Master V for incident metering and a Pentax 1 degree
spotmeter with the 645 and when I can't get to the subject with the Weston.
John
I have, and use quite often,at least with the 6x6 and 6x7's, a Minolta iv F and also
have
the Minolta
Spot Meter,but not used as much. Mostly for winter BW but have not tried it out on
slide
film yet. The
iv F is deadly on bright snow exposures.
Dave
This
Amazing! Seems that more and more photography is done in Photoshop these
days. Is this REALLY photography, or Photoshopography? Never mind that
what one gets from diddling in Photoshop is usually only similar to the
effects achieved by a competent photographer using a camera and appropriate
Absolutely. Pentax Spotmeter V.
Even with 135 on occasion.
Averaging meters don't always cut it.
Being 1/2 stop off on 135 can be tolerated but
being 1/2 stop off on 4x5 or 8x10 makes a diff in the neg.
Even makes a diff with 120. Why? Because 135 loses enough shadow detail and
highlight
What identical posts Keith.
Yesterday at lunch i replied to about 8-9 Paws from a few weeks ago to just recently
submitted. As i
mentioned in a reply to Franks post of 'were are his messages',none have shown up.
As of this writing only one of the 8-9 have shown up on my screen.
This one was
Incidentally, someone wrote to a current issue of Digital Photography
questioning the absence of filter rings on a lot of digital, non-SLR
cameras. While the response touched issues such as some mid-range digital
cameras allowing screw-on adapters, it also echoed that (though some might
say that
I was about to say yes until I paid attention to the word 'analog'. So,
NO. I use a Gossen Luna Pro Digital F. I like this meter because it
will tell me the flash and incident light readings simultaneously,
making it really easy to balance fill flash. Dave
Its a thin concrete mix coating applied to bare poured concrete or block
foundations.Mostly used to hide
imperfections but also acts as a waterproofing agent,to some degree.
Similar texture as in brick layers mortar.
Most older homes in Canada have it but not so much the newer ones(i have the
I use a Gossen Luna Pro from time to time, I use a Minolta flash
meter in the studio (except when shooting digital, and a Zone VI
modified Pentax digital spot meter (not analogue, I realize) when
shooting large format.
William Robb
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Slide film is somewhat of an archaic term even in the US. Today, it's
most often called transparency film. Epson's scanner terminology refers
to it as positive transparency film, while what we commonly call
negative film is designated negative transparency film.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: Re: Polarizer
If you have photoshop, you can apply the polarizing effects after
the
shot...saves buying filters to suit all your lenses anyway!
You can remove reflections easily in Photoshop?
Wow.
I don't think so.
William Robb
SinghRay and Cokin both have several fancy polarisers. The effects you can create
with them are mostly romantic cliché or surrealism... :-)
From SinghRay I only have the plain, regular circular polariser. What I really like
about it is that it is absolutely neutral in colour, and made to fit
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 3:37 AM
Subject: RE: Back from vacation
Its a thin concrete mix coating applied to bare poured concrete or
block
foundations.Mostly used to hide
imperfections but also acts as a
Dave M said: I was about to say yes until I paid attention to the word 'analog'. So,
Oh boy. Missed that completely.D'oh.
However the iv F has an anolog scale which i do look at.lol
Dave Brooks
I've been trying to hold back my little shout out til I actually have it in
hand, but after a day, I've decided that having already paid, it's close
enough. So, what's in the mail.. Well, how about an *ist D, a D BG-1, and a
CS205- straight from the distributor. Should be arriving on Monday or
Three Norwood Directors around here somewhere plus one or two stripped
down for parts. One went successfully through calibration a couple
of years ago. Works just fine. Keep them mostly for the memories ---
first one came into the family in 1949 --- for use with the vacation
film
Hi Ryan.
Good news.
I'd be interested in how you view the Sigma F2.8 when you receive it and have some
trials
with it.
When i get around to getting a *isD,i was thinking of the Sigma 70-210 f2.8
Dave
I've been trying to hold back my little shout out
til I
Negative film is just negative film in most every context. But Epson does refer to it
as a negative transparency, which is actually a very accurate description.
Paul
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Slide film is somewhat of an archaic term even in the US. Today, it's
most often called
From a scanning POV, I guess anything that requires the light to be shone through to
scan it is a transparency, whether it's a photographic film or not. I think it's just
in a scanning context it makes sense to talk about a negative transparency. Mounted
or not. And I can't really imagine why
I've got a 77mm Singh Ray gold and blue polariser (slim for wide angle), and
it's pretty interesting. Unfortunately, it seems to give clouds a pinkish
hue sometimes. It's pretty useful for sunsets and sunrises though.
Here's a link to an image I shot at both extremes (those specks in the mist
are
Hi Paul,
One last thought...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Negative film is just negative film in most every context. But Epson does
refer to it as a negative transparency, which is actually a very accurate
description.
Paul
I've always thought of a transparency as a piece of film you view as is.
You
I should have known better.
--- Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh come now did you really think he wouldn't?
Brendan wrote:
EEEGAADDD!!
VAL!!! how could you!!!
--- Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Care for some Chock full
I have yet to try a a3 off the *istD on my 2200 but
the A4's look very good! from what I have seen a 36x24
won't be too difficult to do once proper care ( and a
good original shot! )
--- Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jostein wrote:
So I got curious. I asked a pro-lab in Oslo to
there's a 70 210 2.8?
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: ENABLEMENT! Well sorta..
Hi Ryan.
Good news.
I'd be interested in how you view the Sigma F2.8 when you receive it and
have some trials
Ah.. I just checked it up.. interesting- I was just making the decision
based on more recent catalogues. Pretty hard to find the 70 210 2.8 I'd
think.. no?
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 12:19 AM
Subject:
Welcome, although you can see what you've gotten yourself into.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/27/2004 7:36:22 AM
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About the only piece of advice you haven't received (and I might as
well say it before Mark Roberts does... vbg): Don't believe
anything I say. LOL
Frantisek a écrit :
GI The same here in Italy: dia, short for diapositiva. The word
GI invertibile (reversible) too was common, at least in a recent
GI past.
Dia seems universal in Europe, from diapositive. Only the strange US
must use the term slides... It doesn't make sense, what is slid where
Should it not have said don't believe what anyone
says, especially FRANK!
--- Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome, although you can see what you've gotten
yourself into.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/27/2004 7:36:22 AM
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About the only
PZ-1p, KEH EX+ condition, includes grip strap, extra battery,
everready case, instruction manual, neckstrap, body cap, etc.
Beautiful condition and works beautifully. $325 including
shipping/insurance in the continental U.S.
FA 28-70 f/4, EX+ condition, this one is the made in Japan one and
A Gossen Lunasix 3s for incident readings (it's spot on, no pun intended) and a
(digital) Gossen SpotMaster for spot readings and flash (when I'm not letting the LX
take care of the flash)
AB
--
Whatever you Wanadoo:
http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/time/
This email has been checked for most known
I have an office just like this buried under a bunch of stuff.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom,
I agree that spam filtering is a very likely cause for messages to disappear, but then
again there's the problem of repeated messages.
I think there must be more than one problem at work here...
If a mail router close to PDML (say two hops away) has problems with eg. flooding,
that could
(Just catching up on some old threads...)
On 8/9/04 22:39, Tom C wrote:
It was my first time to Mt. Hood. I didn't have enough time to research the
details, trails, etc. There's a renowned stock photo that was taken at Lost
Lake in winter that I have admired for over 20 years. I used to
It can be done, not so sure how easy it is depends on one's skill and
which version of PS is being used. I've got a tutorial on it in one of the
PS books, but never tried it.
Shel
If you have photoshop, you can apply the polarizing effects after
the shot...saves buying filters to
thanks for the warm welcome! and answering my questions. understand
about ebay now grin.
well, lasse, you see it's this way. way back when i bought i think my
first SF camera i kept picking it up to find film used, settings changed
etc. finally told my husband get yer own so he did.
Me too. I really like the meter. Mostly use it for studio flash
work, but some ambient readings outdoors, too.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 27, 2004, 6:35:54 AM, you wrote:
DM I was about to say yes until I paid attention to the word 'analog'. So,
DM NO. I use a Gossen Luna Pro
Ryan, Congrats! Sort of... :)
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 27, 2004, 6:48:14 AM, you wrote:
RL I've been trying to hold back my little shout out til I actually have it in
RL hand, but after a day, I've decided that having already paid, it's close
RL enough. So, what's in the mail..
Gossen LunaPro F. I've got the 15/7.5 degree attachment for
pseudo-spot readings, but I use it mostly as an incident meter.
Vital equipment when I'm out with the 4x5...
-Mat
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Polarizer
It can be done, not so sure how easy it is depends on one's
skill and
which version of PS is being used. I've got a tutorial on it in
one of the
PS books, but never tried it.
I can see it for large areas, such
Agreed. Your point about trying to fix lots of small reflections is well
taken. The reflections used as an example in the tutorial I mentioned were
relatively large and quite localized - reflections off the lens of a
subject's eye glasses.
For nature and scenics, the subtle changes that are
Absolutely.
http://mk37.image.pbase.com/u8/wlachan/upload/32821246.21.jpg
http://mk23.image.pbase.com/u8/wlachan/upload/32821247.22.jpg
http://mk31.image.pbase.com/u8/wlachan/upload/32821249.24.jpg
http://mk29.image.pbase.com/u8/wlachan/upload/32821248.23.jpg
I have the following cameras and lenses for sale:
Pentax Z-1 AF SLR + FDP Gripstrap + F electronic cable release +
instruction manual, in Spanish. I will also include 2 unused 2CR5
lithium batteries, each one lasts about twenty-five 36-exposure films.
The camera is in excellent condition, both
You can do some things. like enhancing colours, but you can´t remove
reflections from surfaces because then you have to distinguish between
what is reflected and what was under the surface. No program can do
that, but by guessing a person can do a little bit more.
DagT
På 27. aug. 2004 kl.
Look at the window and group just behind the old lady with red pants.
IMHO that's were you have actually focused. And the lens is soft on
corners (which is suggested by details at left of old man, should be at
about same distance as group and window).
All in all the image has the same look as
Amazing! Seems that more and more photography is done in Photoshop these
days. Is this REALLY photography, or Photoshopography? Never mind that
what one gets from diddling in Photoshop is usually only similar to the
effects achieved by a competent photographer using a camera and
I agree. The filter removes information coming into the image plane, if
you dont filter it, once the unfiltered light gets blended in, there is
no information in the bits that say: this bit is polarized at such and
such angle. Photoshop stuff is a fudge at best to duplicate the look.
Color
On 27/8/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Too much fiddling, not enough photography.
I realize that there is a whole contingent of people out there who
try to find a software solution to everything (The don't worry if
the shot is buggered up, we'll fix it later in Photoshop
You are a class act Shel. Glad you're still around.
Robert
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: I enjoy film
For me the issue is quality results in conventional BW and quality
processing
Hmmm. Let's do some statistics. Supposing that 80% of the camera owners
are boneheads (in respect to photography) and 50% of the lab operators
are boneheads (in respect to their work). What is the probability that
when a customer enters a random lab, at least one of them
client/operator is a
Sounds like typical English weather. . .
OK, I just found out that I´ve been at it for exactly half a year (26
PAW´s). I´ve tried to keep posting pictures taken within the previous
week, but its hard to get an interesting shot every week so it is time
to stop :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2646908size=lg
DagT
Vic ...
Time to burst your bubble: not every lab is going to give you the same
quality results when processing slide film. As with all labs, there are
those that are poor, those that are good, and those that are superior. Try
this experiment: get a few short rolls of your favorite slide film,
Great shot love the composition. Simple, direct.
Shel
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I just found out that I´ve been at it for exactly half a year (26
PAW´s). I´ve tried to keep posting pictures taken within the previous
week, but its hard to get an interesting shot every week so
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: Re: More 35mm vs digital (price, upgradability...)
But this reminds me, during the discussions about whether there is
going to be a market for film or not, I've been thinking that surely
there are still many
DJE,
I'd take the M28/2.0. I recently acquired the K30/2.8 and like what results I have
seen, but the M28/2.0 seems just as good to me. Mind you, I haven't done any formal
testing, but the M28/2.0 seems to be as good as any wide Pentax makes from the K28/3.5
to the K30/2.8 or either 24/2.8.
8-)
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Sounds like typical English weather. . .
In its changeability, yes. In its extremity, no. At one point there
was just over 1 of rain in 2 hours. Not severe by the standards of
some parts of the world but pretty fierce for the UK.
As my tent was new, I spent most
Hi,
Is anybody here still using hand metering and if yes, when?
Yes. I have a Sekonic L-608 (electronic, flash, spot, etc) and a
Sekonic L-208 Twinmate (analogue, incident and reflected light).
I use the L-208 all the time for incident readings when I shoot
with my Leicas, which don't have
Hi,
Dia seems universal in Europe, from diapositive. Only the strange US
must use the term slides... It doesn't make sense, what is slid where ;-) ?
they are slides in the UK too. They slide into the projector. Dia and
diapositive don't make sense either - techie jargon.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Hi Jon,
I have a tool for 49mm and 52mm lenses.
It is a metal cylinder with a gum rubber ring inside, works great.
Before I got that I used a wooden disc cut slightly smaller than the filter
size and a piece of the new non-slip rubber shelf liner.
Not as convenient but worked OK.
The trick is to
Shel wrote:
My first suggestion would be to get two books by Ansel Adams: The
Negative
and The Print. Those books are a great starting place, even if you
don't
like Adams' work or accept some of his theories.
I couldn't agree more. When I returned to darkroom work after a twenty
year hiatus,
On 27/8/04, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
8-)
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Sounds like typical English weather. . .
In its changeability, yes. In its extremity, no. At one point there
was just over 1 of rain in 2 hours. Not severe by the standards of
some parts of the world but
I really like this. You've captured the sky in all its glory and your
subject is also well exposed. The framing and composition are very
artful and the subject is interesting. Great work. Don't stop posting
your PAWs. We enjoy them.
Paul
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I just found out that
Just wondering. When I display a good pic on my monitor, it looks sharp
bright and contrasty. Now my monitor is small and has a resolution of
only 72 dpi, so I can't display at 1:1 pixels but only a small part of a
lets say 6 MP image from the *istD. Now suppose that I could buy a
monitor with
Excellent, DagT. Very original. Too bad it's your last! :)
t
On 8/27/04 12:31, DagT wrote:
OK, I just found out that I´ve been at it for exactly half a year (26
PAW´s). I´ve tried to keep posting pictures taken within the previous
week, but its hard to get an interesting shot every week so
Very nice and taken with a DA14. So one has been manufactured. Great photo!
-Original Message-
From: DagT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - The last one
OK, I just found out that I´ve been at it for exactly half a year
Is anybody here still using hand metering and if yes, when?
I still use a Pentax Spotmeter V from time to time. It's invaluable
when you want to nail a specific part of a scene -- such as the sky at
sunset. It's also great for determining the exposure range of a scene,
and the sweeping
Cotty wrote:
On 27/8/04, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
8-)
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Sounds like typical English weather. . .
In its changeability, yes. In its extremity, no. At one point there
was just over 1 of rain in 2 hours. Not severe by the standards of
some parts of the
What was the hurricane that hit London almost full force in 87 or 88? I
was in a room on about the 20th floor of the hotel that sits at what
must be the southwest corner of Hyde Park. I woke up in the middle of
the night and the window was pushing in and out. It must have been
moving an inch
Great post Shel, I'm getting inspired to do BW again.
All the way from exposure to final print.
Fortunately all I'll need is film, paper and chemistry.
The rest just fell in my lap the other week in the form of
6 big boxes of darkroom stuff and a decent enlarger.
It was given to a friend and he
I love it!
DON'T stop!
Just switch to PESOs. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: DagT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - The last one
OK, I just found out that I´ve been at it for exactly half a year (26
PAW´s).
Barnes and Noble, here I come.
Hope I can pick your brain a bit too Paul.
After 25+ years I might be a tad rusty. ;-(
Not to mention no clue as to what chemistry/paper
is available now.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004
So here's the lady, antithesis to the 'convince-the-missus' institution!
Welcome the list, Karen. Commendable how the million or so messages a day
didn't get you into panicpanicsh*thowdoiunsubscribe mode. I haven't yet had
the chance to browse your site, but I will pretty soon. Til then..
One more time in case anyone didn't get it the first time:
I finally made up my mind as what to keep and what to sell.
Probably put these up for auction this weekend or next.
Thought I'd give you all first shot.
15 Pentax cameras, some body only, some with lenses, etc.
*ist, ZX-5, ZX-10, Super
mike wilson wrote:
As my tent was new, I spent most nights listening to the
unfamiliar noises it was making in the gales, rather than
sleeping. The next day's sailing of the catamaran was cancelled.
Camping in the UK?? On the two occasions I have *endured* this, I abandoned
the tent in the
a camera similar in quality/specs to the Olympus 35RC, or XA, or Stylus
Epic?
Three generations of wonderful little cameras.
I've never seen one, if they did I'd love to have one!
Don
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had this discussion before. My opinion, not shared by most of
the list, it seems, is that by the time a developing maket can afford
to support film to the extent needed to keep it a viable commodity,
it will probably be able to support digital.
Price
Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should it not have said don't believe what anyone
says, especially FRANK!
I don't believe that.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Here Ya' go.
This is the Beljan 49mm one:
http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/LensTool.htm
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jon M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lens tool
Hi,
If you could show me the pictures of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
I am starting to disbelieve all the horror stories regarding photo
labs on this list. It is just as likely that there is a large group
of boneheads with cameras as boneheads running photo labs.
Perhaps the dependance on auto everything cameras making
Whose lap was it?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I enjoy film
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
I am starting to disbelieve all the horror stories regarding
Well, if you are reasonably competent and you have the appropriate
plug-ins, you actually can remove reflections in photoshop!
Cheers
Shaun
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: Re: Polarizer
If you have photoshop, you can apply the polarizing
Don Sanderson wrote:
...a camera similar in quality/specs to the Olympus 35RC, or XA, or Stylus
Epic?
Three generations of wonderful little cameras.
I've never seen one, if they did I'd love to have one!
Don
I have an XA, a 35 SP, and a couple of Pen Fs.
I know of no similar cameras from
Just a Kodak trademark I suppose. The even used the term for some BW films, as
in Verichrome Pan.
--
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
What about chromes?
That nickname came from Kodak's Kodachrome® and Ektachrome® film, from which
most 'slides' in the U.S. came,
As well as I can recall, a slide originally referred to a 3-1/4 x 4 glass
plate (like a microscope slide only bigger) positive for projection. By
extension any positive transparency mounted for projection.
Technically I guess a negative is actually a negative transparency, but common
usage in
I was in London during a hurricane that hit with considerable force.
The weather bureau failed to post any kind of warning. I guess the
storm gained strength right before it came out of the Atlantic. I think
it was 1987. I was in a room on about the 20th floor of a hotel. i
believe it was at
nine days total around various parts of the Adirondacks in New York State
and also in the local area as i had from Saturday to Sunday off. the first
three are from Minnewaska State Park and the last one is from Harriman State
Park. the rest are from various places in the Adirondacks. most of the
Still metering with my L398, it's a trusty tool. When? Whenever situation
calls for incident metering :)
KW Hah! How about my trusty L-28c2? NO batteries! g
KW I use it when my subject is in drastically different light than my camera's
KW in. If I can.
KW Such as when I'm standing in full
KW We in the U.S. have a LOT of odd regional or national words, with one or
KW the other historical background stories to support it's use.
KW I suspect the same is true of most European countries as well, truth be known...
Sure. That's what makes languages fun :)
Fra
KW That nickname came from
when i was in the Adirondacks, i was north and west of Lake George. most of
the shots are from areas reachable from NY Route 73 toward Lake Placid or
north along NY Route 9N. along the way toward Lake Placid.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Yes, the planned obsolescence of many products is unfortunate. I had a
good cell phone that I needed to get a replacement battery for. When I took
it back to the store where I got it from I was told the battery was no
longer available. So I had to get a new phone.
My Optio 230 is very
I still use my 1.3 Mpixel panasonic almost daily
for ebay pix. I don't need anymore resolution for
that, I always have to resize down anyway. I have
no plans on replacing it until it dies. Sometimes
obsolete isnt really obsolete, depends on the application.
JCO
-Original Message-
From:
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
