This was taken recently on a photo outing with my middle daughter. I
used the Yellow/Blue Polarizer to enhance the small rainbow showing at
the bottom of the water falling.
Comments welcome.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Tripod, Cokin Yellow/Blue Polarizer
ISO 200, 21mm focal length, 1/8 sec @ F19
I have to say that I rather like this. Probably not something I would
have thought of taking, but it's kind of nice to see mostly grays
instead of strong orange/yellow/reds. It has a somber, end of day
feel to it.
Thanks for sharing with us.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 10, 2005
On 10 Feb 2005 at 20:58, Isaac wrote:
> Bummer. I would have liked one. Cheap lenses and a nice feel would make me
> happy. I haven't liked the digitals I've tried so far. Not enough control
> and horrible optics on most of them. That's why I'm back to film.
The *ist D and *ist Ds have pretty dec
--- "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really miss the grid screen in my LX...
Just take any Pentax grid screen and do some sawing and filing work will do. I
know
a DS owner did the same and worked.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
___
--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately finding a decent lab can be a painful process, ask too little
> and
> you'll get fobbed off, be too direct and you'll get the stare. I think these
> days the people are the key, most processes can be made to deliver quality
> product b
--- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hope this Velvia 100 does make it to the US. A
> different color pallet from 100F is encouraging to
> read. If resolution should approach that of the 50, my
> Provia 100F might have a some competition even though
> Fuji claims Provia 100F, also, has a fi
On 10 Feb 2005 at 18:43, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> What should I ask about their processing and equipment? What kind of
> responses
> are good? If they tell me that they use such and such a machine, or that it's
> calibrated in some particular way, what the hell do I know?
>
> Any suggestions w
Hope this Velvia 100 does make it to the US. A
different color pallet from 100F is encouraging to
read. If resolution should approach that of the 50, my
Provia 100F might have a some competition even though
Fuji claims Provia 100F, also, has a finer grain than
Velvia.
Jack
--- Pål Jensen <[EM
I've been using a couple of local labs here for a while for color
processing, and overall their work has been quite good. Lately, however,
the film has been coming back badly spotted, scratched, and with what
appear to be water stains. My camping experience is no longer a happy one.
These labs ha
--- Pawel Bartuzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to ask refconverter A owners here on the list: does your
> refconverter stay at 90 angle in relation to a camera back or does it go
> down a little?
I think it does. Mine look straight up when mounted on Z-1p which was put on the
table.
Bill you forgot to tell him to get the FF 15 mega-pixel digital back for the
K and M series. You can't forget about that.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:36:56 -0600
- Original Mess
There is a digital back for the K series? Where is that found at? And how
much?
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 6:57 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Nothing very special just a pleasant photo. Possibly a bit to much
contrast.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_simplesunset.html
Technical Detail:
Pentax *ist-D ISO 800 @ 1/90sec
SMC-Pentax M 85mm f2.0 @ f2.0
I really miss the grid screen in my LX...
--
I can understand why mankind has
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> BTW, please define 'substandard'.
It's the minimum requirement for undersea exploration...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Bummer. I would have liked one. Cheap lenses and a nice feel would make me
happy. I haven't liked the digitals I've tried so far. Not enough control
and horrible optics on most of them. That's why I'm back to film.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Damn you for your enablement Robb...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
Bill you forgot to tell him to get the FF 15 mega-pixel digital back
for the K and M series. You can't forget about that.
Lenses are truly where it's at.
You can neve
Hi Isaac,
That was a bit of PDML humor. If common sense prevails -- and I'm certain it
will -- there will never be a digital back for a film SLR. It's much easier and
more cost effective to design a camera around the digital concept rather than
trying to adapt an old camera. Sorry, no digital ba
Bill Robb opined,
> Lenses are truly where it's at.
> You can never have too many lenses..
So true. Bodies come and go, but lenses are forever. A fine optic will always
be a fine optic. The camera is simply the open and close device that goes
between lens and film or, in the new world, lens and
Running late on some comments.
First allow me to say that the K55/1.8 is a very nice lens. It's not as
sharp as some, and needs to be stopped down a bit for best results, but I
like the way it renders the image on film.
This pic is quite soft, far softer than the results the K55/1.8 is capable
o
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
And here I thought it was about seeing and vision... I'm still
considering an FA 31 LTD, though.
Nice lens, isn't it?
William Robb
LOL
Thats gotta make it to the '05 quote list.
Dave S
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:03:09 -0500 (EST), John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Taking photographic advice from a web page chosen based on
> popularity is like taking cooking advice from a MacDonalds.
not in PowerPoint. music and slides are independent. you need programs
designed for this. many of the slideshow programs for under $60 will do this
to some degree. i use Adobe Premiere, but it is a very expensive program.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
And here I thought it was about seeing and vision... I'm still considering
an FA 31 LTD, though.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:57:19 -0600
- Original Message - From: "Tom C"
S
So replicators are pernicious and prefer fast food over gourmet?
Larry
No but I felt very insulted, it ignored my Pentax entirely and
attacked the guy walking past with the Canon
Powershot Pro1, I'd have shot a few photos but my buffer was full...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has SG-1 been alerted ye
--- Collin R Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got my black MX back from the CLA.
> It's mechanically nice now.
> But the dingbat tech "slipped" with the spanner on the top of the wider knob.
> So there's a big scratch on the top.
> Anyone got a black one of these posts available?
Just sear
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
Bill you forgot to tell him to get the FF 15 mega-pixel digital
back for the K and M series. You can't forget about that.
Lenses are truly where it's at.
You can never have too many lenses..
William Robb
... but KEH has the ists now.
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact."
Howard Hendricks
I have two black MX's both have the same problem that you describe from
the came cause.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
>Peter J. Alling
>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:45:47 -0800
>Yep, they both have scratches from dingbat technicians.
I don't get it.
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life u
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, but so far it was only available in Japan.
And Fujifilm made it clear that it wouldn't be exported offically. From what I
have
read, RVP100 is not exactly identical to RVP on colour rendition. I really
dislike
RVP100F btw.
=
Alan Chan
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: Re: kenny-boy on CBS
Ah so I need the best equipment.
It amazes me that this concept is hard to grasp.
William Robb
Just slightly OT
They've got an old Kalimar 800-1200/9-11 zoom. T-mount. Creme color.
Might be fun. Maybe nice for digital birding. But it's unfortunately $249.
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact."
Howard Hendri
Ah so I need the best equipment.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 10, 2005 10:04 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: kenny-boy on CBS
>
> From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/02/10 Thu PM 01:18:45 GMT
> To: pentax-disc
>Peter J. Alling
>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:45:47 -0800
>Yep, they both have scratches from dingbat technicians.
I don't get it.
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact."
Howard Hendricks
I would like to ask refconverter A owners here on the list: does your
refconverter stay at 90 angle in relation to a camera back or does it go
down a little? Mine looks as if it looked into viewfinder a little from
under the center of a viewfinder (like in
www.pentax.ca/support/manual_pdfs/acce
Not even close Fnarf.
IIRC, substandard was in regards to equipment.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 10, 2005 7:56 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: kenny-boy on CBS
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:43:10 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth
But Frank, they're not substandard...(wait for it), ... for you.
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:43:10 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, please define 'substandard'.
Easy:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=381188
cheers,
frank
>
> From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/02/10 Thu PM 01:18:45 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: kenny-boy on CBS
>
> On 10 Feb 2005 at 4:06, Keith Whaley wrote:
>
> > Atta boy, Dave! Boil it down to it's essence.
> > A really capable photographer can make really
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/02/10 Thu PM 02:56:59 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: PESO Ancient Breadscape
>
>
> >
> > From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2005/02/10 Thu PM 01:16:45 GMT
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: PESO Ancient Brea
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:43:10 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, please define 'substandard'.
Easy:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=381188
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Yes, a noseless pretty girl... I may have nightmares.
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:52:39 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, yes that is very silly, very silly indeed.
Well, I for one appreciated the article.
It's about as relevent to me as noise reduct
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:52:39 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, yes that is very silly, very silly indeed.
>
Well, I for one appreciated the article.
It's about as relevent to me as noise reduction, and I got to look at
a picture of a pretty girl in the bargain. That can'
Yep, they both have scratches from dingbat technicians.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Got my black MX back from the CLA.
It's mechanically nice now.
But the dingbat tech "slipped" with the spanner on the top of the
wider knob.
So there's a big scratch on the top.
Anyone got a black one of these post
BTW, please define 'substandard'.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 10, 2005 3:50 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: kenny-boy on CBS
On 10/2/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Substandard tools are incapable of producing an excellent
Unfortunately I've seen it happen...
Cotty wrote:
On 10/2/05, wendy beard, discombobulated, unleashed:
there was even some mad reporter from the local TV
station interviewing the
sculptures
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/39567008
That's a cameraman - the reporter would actual
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:21:48 -0500 (EST), wendy beard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sent this yesterday but it didn't show up.
>
> Thought Frank might have posted about his trip to
> Ottawa by now. Maybe he did and that didn't appear
> either :-)
> Anyway, I popped down to look at the ice sculptu
Hey it's same-themed as my Automaton PESO! :) Gotta love the SMC
windscreens..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:20 AM
Subject: PESO: Homeward
> I am not really sure how well this stands on its own. It's more the first
>
Hiya Eric, welcome to the stew! Looking forward to see some of your
interpretations of challenging English weather!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Featherstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
> At 05:08 pm 1
Jeez Cotty. Obviously- can't you see his reversing lights are on? The guy
next to him is reversing too.
:)
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list"
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
> On 10/2/05, Ryan Lee, discom
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: kenny-boy on CBS
Hmmm. Define 'excellent'.
Technically refined, in the context I meant to portray.
They can still be boring as a blank sheet.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: kenny-boy on CBS
However if you are out to make the the best end product wouldn't
it make sense to use the best tools for the job?
If the operator part of the equation is up to the challenge,
certainly.
But to get the best equipmen
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Featherstone"
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
. I'm strictly amateur, a K1000 user
for the last 15 or so years though I've also got hold of an MX and
ME super lately.
I used K-1000s for many years as a wedding camera.
I have a lot of respect for those suck
Got my black MX back from the CLA.
It's mechanically nice now.
But the dingbat tech "slipped" with the spanner on the top of the wider knob.
So there's a big scratch on the top.
Anyone got a black one of these posts available?
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The c
At 05:08 pm 10/02/2005, Ryan did write:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3107166&size=lg
Any comments appreciated :)
Cheers,
Ryan
Firstly... Gosh, that's within a few miles of where I live! And I rather
like the photo. Thanks for sharing, Ryan.
Secondly... It's about time I said hi eve
Hello John,
I have gone down that road in the long past and finally concluded that
the best approach is to use a video editing program that has a
timeline. The video editors handle stills as well as video. You drop
your images on the timeline and drop the music track down. Adjust
duration of sl
Check out Microsoft Photo Story here
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/digitalphotography/photostory/default.mspx
It's a free download if you're using a registered copy of XP. You can use
music, voice nattation, pan and zooms with the pix. The created file runs
on Windows Media Playe
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'll throw in a drill thrawl with thorny thighs too.
I see the 2005 quotation collection is well under way already...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Anyone here use Powerpoint? I need to make a photo slideshow for my
brother's upcoming wedding, and I need to be able to sync music with certain
parts of it. Anyone here know how to do that? I'm very new to Powerpoint.
Also, if you know of a program that would be better to use for this than
On 10 Feb 2005 at 19:22, Bob W wrote:
> In Richard Caplan, which is the store in question, they do have a
> slightly snooty attitude on the whole, but that fits their location,
> St. James's, where everything is by appointment to Prince Charles.
Richard himself seems a nice enough guy, I had a de
On 10/2/05, wendy beard, discombobulated, unleashed:
>there was even some mad reporter from the local TV
>station interviewing the
>sculptures
>http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/39567008
That's a cameraman - the reporter would actually be talking to the
sculpture ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
__
On 10/2/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'll bet you 500 Quatloos that IS/USM contacts eventually show up in the
>area where the "aperture simulator" ring used to be :)
I'm in.
I'll throw in a drill thrawl with thorny thighs too.
No way Jose.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O
On 10/2/05, Ryan Lee, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3107166&size=lg
>
>Any comments appreciated :)
That guy in the middle lane reversing into you?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.c
Henri Toivonen wrote:
Fuji has apparently released a new film, called Velvia 100 (not to be
confused with 100F).
According to the press release it has finer grain than 50, at twice
the speed.
Next year Velvia 50 will be gone from the shelves.
/Henri
Oops, forgot the url:
http://www.fujifilm.com
Woot is very flip about all their sales items.
Tim Sherburne wrote:
Hmmm, they should discuss their ad copy a bit more. I find this imagery to
be chilling: "The lighted adapter eats negatives for breakfast and slides
for lunch..." I prefer my negs to be uneaten, undigested! :)
On 10 Feb 2005 at 11:14, Albano Garcia wrote:
>
> Ryan,
> This is basic chinese for me :-)
> All I need to know is if the claimed output gets
> divided by the quantity of batteries being charged or
> if not.
> They sell it as a 2 and a half hour charger, (900 mnA
> by 2,5 is 2250 mA, and my batts
Too many distracting elements and no composition.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: "Badri A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:46 AM
Subject: PESO - hair braiding
Hi,
http://
Chris Stoddart wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Congratulations to all the UK members of the list on the impending
marriage or the Heir-a-parent to the English throne!
Why thank you! But collectively as a nation I think we were about 100
times more impressed by Ellen MacArthu
On 10/2/05, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Congratulations to all the UK members of the list on the impending
>marriage or the Heir-a-parent to the English throne!
Oh cripes. I've been stuck down in Tetsworth all day, which is in our patch.
It's 2 miles from Highgrove (Prince C
I just ordered a Sigma lens but I may be interested in the teleconvertor.
How does it attach? Is it at the end of the lens or at the mount? What is
the condition?
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this good or bad? Are you sayin the new 100 is better than the F or the
discontinued 50?
I have used the 100F film and was quite satisfied:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/1731174/
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Pål Je
On 2005-02-10, at 20:59, Pål Jensen wrote:
This film was released a couple of years ago along with the Velvia
100F and Astia 100F.
Yup, but so far it was only available in Japan.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
>wrapped in their ever ready case and with a condom-like UV filter placed
>over the lens.
>
>Shel
>
>==
>Hehehehehe. That's the funny thing I've heard so far this week.
>
>Marnie aka Doe I got to remember that one.
Hey what's so funny, I use a condom on one or two of my lenses.
Real
On 10/2/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Substandard tools are incapable of producing an excellent product.
Hmmm. Define 'excellent'.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
"John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark Roberts mused:
>> I'll bet you 500 Quatloos that IS/USM contacts eventually show up in the
>> area where the "aperture simulator" ring used to be :)
>
>I'll take that bet.
>
>There's still the aperture actuating lever, which is pretty close to
>the
I sent this yesterday but it didn't show up.
Thought Frank might have posted about his trip to
Ottawa by now. Maybe he did and that didn't appear
either :-)
Anyway, I popped down to look at the ice sculptures in
Confederation
Park. Very disappointing this year. The weather was so
warm at the weeke
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Congratulations to all the UK members of the list on the impending
> marriage or the Heir-a-parent to the English throne!
Why thank you! But collectively as a nation I think we were about 100
times more impressed by Ellen MacArthur breaking the rou
Peter J. Alling mused:
>
> no they find Ken Rockwell, who runs a "Popular" web page.
Taking photographic advice from a web page chosen based on
popularity is like taking cooking advice from a MacDonalds.
Henri wrote:
> Fuji has apparently released a new film, called Velvia 100 (not to be
> confused with 100F).
> According to the press release it has finer grain than 50, at twice the
> speed.
> Next year Velvia 50 will be gone from the shelves.
This film was released a couple of years ago alo
Mark Roberts mused:
>
> Martin Trautmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I did not read the KAF3 patents myself (three from 2001?). I doubt that they
> >would provide real information how the mount would look like. But there
> >should not be only less than KAF2, but somehow more. This may be hidd
Thank you, but I can assure you that I personally had nothing to do with
it. Can't speak for the others, though.
John
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:46:24 -0500, Daniel J. Matyola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations to all the UK members of the list on the impending
marriage or the Hei
Fuji has apparently released a new film, called Velvia 100 (not to be
confused with 100F).
According to the press release it has finer grain than 50, at twice the
speed.
Next year Velvia 50 will be gone from the shelves.
/Henri
Hmmm, they should discuss their ad copy a bit more. I find this imagery to
be chilling: "The lighted adapter eats negatives for breakfast and slides
for lunch..." I prefer my negs to be uneaten, undigested! :)
Tim
On 2/10/05 11:44, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Another big push to sell scanners:
It's a sculpture, at least I think it is...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What the heck is that thing?! It doesn't look like a real bug at all, but
some sort of mechanical or toy model.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling
This appeared in front of the local library...
http://www.mi
Another big push to sell scanners:
http://www.woot.com/woot_detail.aspx
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Peter & Fred,
I purchased an M85/2 when it was first introduced (outrageously priced)
and focusing was smooth and not stiff right out of the box. (still is)
Perhaps lack of use and aging combine to stiffen
What the heck is that thing?! It doesn't look like a real bug at all, but
some sort of mechanical or toy model.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Peter J. Alling
> >>This appeared in front of the local library...
> >>
> >>
> >>http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_replicator.html
As suggested yesterday, I have two K-mount lenses for sale:
1) An excellent (close tor mint condition) RMC Tokina 4.5/80-200mm Zoom lens
(4.5 all the way) with "Close Focus" (macro) for sale.
It's a K-mount lens - perfect for K1000, M-series, and excellent for A- and
MZ-series and useable with *is
Hi,
>It's not entirely undeserved I don't think. For example there's a Leica
>specialist shop in London (UK) who's adverts often appear in the photo
>press with the tagline "Where the elite meet and greet". I mean, yuk!
>It's enough to send one scurrying in the direction of Voigtlander.
...except
No but I felt very insulted, it ignored my Pentax entirely and attacked
the guy walking past with the Canon
Powershot Pro1, I'd have shot a few photos but my buffer was full...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has SG-1 been alerted yet??? Do we need to call the Asgard???
This appeared in front of the
Note: I had to pull this off the archives, since Mark's response never
made it to my inbox.
-
Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
The originating IP was 204.127.198.39 (comcast.net)
I've searched my most recent pdml emails, and the only comcast.net
Ryan,
This is basic chinese for me :-)
All I need to know is if the claimed output gets
divided by the quantity of batteries being charged or
if not.
They sell it as a 2 and a half hour charger, (900 mnA
by 2,5 is 2250 mA, and my batts are 2300 mA), but I
don't know if it's true if 4 batts are bei
(Hi Fred.) Pentax used to list one for the Super Program/Super A too!
I may have one somewhere... Bob S.
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:05:24 -0500, Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 20-30 years ago someone made a battery compartment adapter, which allowed
> > the user to keep the battery in the pocket
Ah yes, nothing like good old mold to whet the appetite. Would like to see
some even closer macro shots. Probably some nice abstracts in there.
Tom C.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO Ancient Breadscape
Date: T
Peter & Fred,
I purchased an M85/2 when it was first introduced (outrageously priced)
and focusing was smooth and not stiff right out of the box. (still is)
Perhaps lack of use and aging combine to stiffen it.
And I know others dislike this lens, but I've got some memorable pix with it.
Regards,
Thanks for your comments!
You're right, the hair-stylist is too dark. Unfortunately I didn't
have my huge add-on flash with me that day. These are the (few) times
I wish I had a newer body with a built-in flash.
Would a half-stop overexposure have worked? Of course, I wasn't
thinking about the
Has SG-1 been alerted yet??? Do we need to call the Asgard???
>This appeared in front of the local library...
>
>
>http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_replicator.html
>
>
>Technical:
>
>
>Pentax *ist-D iso 200 1/350sec
>smc PENTAX-F 70-210mmF4-5.6
>
>
>smc PENTAX-F 70-210mmF4-5.6 @ 70mm f4
I agree with Butch. An alternative to trying to throw
the background out of focus might be to use a
wider-angle lens and move in closer; the background
objects will be larger in number but smaller in size,
and contribute context and "atmosphere" without as
much distraction. A number of viewers ar
After seeing that, makes me want to check my bread a bit more
carefully before eating. How much magnification is it? How did you
get to that magnification?
Without a title, I would be hard pressed to figure out just what we
were looking at. Nice work.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, Februa
Almost new condition with case, F&R caps, and extra length screw-in
Heliopan lens hood. Contact me off list for details or to discuss. Sorry
for not waiting until tomorrow - may not be able to get on line then.
Shel
Marnie,
This must be commute day for PESO's. I just commented on Ryan's
submission.
Like his, I find myself in this situation quite often, but rarely see
a picture of it. The lighting here is nice and helps the image.
After seeing Ryan's, I wonder how this would look in B&W?
I think you have a
Get a grip and learn to laugh. Only a fool takes offense where none is
intended.
Regards,
Bob...
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I gotta jump in and say "What a load of crap." Leica owners have really
gotten associated with this business of fondling their gear, collecting
[Deleted]
Sheesh, didn't I paste it into the message? Getting batty in my
old age... ;-)
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW4/33.htm
Godfrey
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >This is a hand-held exposure at 1/10 of a second with t
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
