Hi
Does anyone on this mailing list use Picasa 2? I've been playing
around with it a bit, and it seems to suit my needs fairly well.
However, before investing more of my time labelling my pictures, I was
wondering if anyone has any experience of migrating Picasa installs
- e.g. moving to a new
In a message dated 5/23/2005 12:15:24 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When something becomes work it is not fun any more.
===
Now that is not true for everyone. I often enjoy my work, or work I have done
in the past (since technically I am unemployed right now,
In a message dated 5/23/2005 5:48:01 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good news. Thanks for the update. Placing the RAW as a smart object
should be a very valuable tool. I sometimes find myself going back to
RAW to make another change. It would be nice to do that without
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/23 Mon PM 11:43:08 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Understanding exposure? Recommendations?
On 23 May 2005 at 12:51, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not in todays environment Bob. Just blast away, capture innumerable
frames,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/24 Tue AM 07:19:13 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PS CS2 ACR was Speaking of exposure
In a message dated 5/23/2005 5:48:01 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good news. Thanks for the update. Placing the RAW as a
On 24/5/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
There doesn't seem to be a way to get into this. What's the secret? When
I request information on how to access a public folder, I am directed to
sign in!
Here's some help John:
Connecting to someone's Public
On 24/5/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've put a RAW and a highest quality jpeg in my Public Folder on iDisk,
grab them from there.
User: cottycam
Let me know what you think.
What's this iDisk thing Cotty?
Are the days of email, web serving and FTP gone?
Ahar, I didn't
Thanks Brian, I probably should down load the trial offer.
One further question - what are the RAW conversion controls offered by this
software?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Raw
Ken
Any comments I make probably wont do the
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=13613287
What do ya think?
--
Thibouille
--
Z1,SuperA,KX,MX,P30t and KR-10x ...
A few rebuttles:
Your original complaint had something to do with wanting something done to
the histogram.
Presumably to ensure you aren't taking more than the bare minimum of
exposures required to do the job.
Astro-photography often averages lots of images. If you bracket
dozens
Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent collection, Gianco. I especially like the one
called The Eye. I was looking for a good abstract composition
involving the wheel, but didn't find one.
I'm happy you enjoyed the gallery!
About The Eye,
Mishka wrote:
why not move to texas?
You mean, Texas where the death penalty is applied to those who break
the law against shooting people?
On 5/23/05, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
found that there are a lot of people in the world who feel their
mission in life is making as many
about folk going what I remeber is
(aside from you and better half and Doug, that is)
I'll be there with my wife (French) and my brother in law (Bob).
asking a question . about which photos I should
bring with me)
FWIW, I plan on bringing a portfolio of large format prints of my
On 24/5/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a couple of mine:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye2.jpg
Both taken with the 31 Ltd :)
The first one's good for me.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 24/5/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including
the lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out
of a file from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
DAYTON:
There's always a couple of camera dealers selling @ or near
store prices. $100 for a K1000.
But ... I got a Tenba camera backpack for $25.
There were some nice items that I passed on.
NAD 3140 amp for $50.
Dell server with 4 Pentium Pro CPUs 40 gig HD for $50.
(Lots of that stuff --
G'day Cesar,
Glad to have been of some small assistance :-)
I said at the time you asked that I could think of no reason not to
get it...you obviously agreed g
Dave
On 5/24/05, Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been a member of this list since the days of The Who. [How many
remember
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/5/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a couple of mine:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye2.jpg
Both taken with the 31 Ltd :)
The first one's good for me.
Good! I included the second one as an
Boris,
IMO, this doesn't work unless this volume increasing
total composition is in the same frame.
Pleasing warm textures, if slightly top heavy.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=190899
I've been told that this photo
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
about folk going what I remeber is
(aside from you and better half and Doug, that is)
I'll be there with my wife (French) and my brother in law (Bob).
asking a question . about which photos I should
bring with me)
FWIW, I plan on bringing a
damn that's a big bicycle
Mark Roberts wrote:
Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent collection, Gianco. I especially like the one
called The Eye. I was looking for a good abstract composition
involving the wheel, but didn't find one.
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/24 Tue PM 01:08:30 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My London PDML 2005 Gallery, at last...
damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to ride 8-)
Next: puncture jokes.
Mark Roberts wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half way between 4 and 5.6?
And where does 4.76 fall? This is a 2.8 lens with the
SMCP-F 1.7x converter.
I'm guessing there is a simple multiplier for this but
with my limited knowledge of math I have no clue
what it is.
This is
Sort of a sense of doom hanging over the lower lamp, hey?
From an artistic sense the photo works quite well. It does not give a
comfortable feeling, but it gives a strong one. Why is it that we feel photos
are supposed to be comfortable, (unless they depict human suffering).
graywolf
In a message dated 5/21/2005 3:55:55 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/16/05, Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
Late, but not TOO late (I hope...), my London PDML gallery is up
at:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=495917
I don't have as many prints prepared as usual but I'm going to try to
get a few more done in the next week. May even have to (gasp) have
someone else print some BW shots for me!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I am
In a message dated 5/24/2005 2:09:51 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=190899
I've been told that this photo has broken composition. It is as if
there are two separates shots inside one - one with lower lamp and the
other
Thanks, Mark.
They are both superb. Love the colour.
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 13:17:59 +0100, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent collection, Gianco. I especially like the one
called The Eye.
In a message dated 5/24/2005 4:40:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in
With older cameras that have manual aperture control, I just turn the dial and
position it between the two spots. You can even do that in thirds with enough
accuracy for any practical application. With my *istD cameras and my LX I use
exposure compensation to split stops. Calculating numerical
Your signature will be empty when you sell everyting :-)
Peter B.
On 5/24/05, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are items I'm selling:
* P30t: bit of brassing
* Ricoh KR-10x (little price, really, I don't want 200 dollars for this one ;)
* SuperA/SuperProgram: brassing
* MotorA:
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye2.jpg
damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to ride 8-)
Next: puncture jokes.
Guess you spoke too soon...
--
Not really, I still have My KX (and no way I part with this one), MX
(maybe I'll do if I must), Z1 (I really don't want but who knows).
Plus an Ist-D(s?) soon if all goes well so do not woory for me, thanks ;)
--
Thibouille
--
Z1,SuperA,KX,MX,P30t and
On 24/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I am planning to bring my favorites done whilst taking the darkroom class
the past few
winters. I have
several 11x14's i want to bring if i can find something nice to carry them.
Also a few from the digital darkroom
Please keep the
damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to ride 8-)
Next: puncture jokes.
Guess you spoke too soon...
This chain of events always happens.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Cesar looked for someone to blame for his recent acquisitions:
I have been a member of this list since the days of The Who. [How many
remember that?] I do not recall enablement on the list from those days.
It may have been because I was such a photographic 'newbie' :-)
Anyway, I saw my
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to ride 8-)
Next: puncture jokes.
Guess you spoke too soon...
This chain of events always happens.
Good thing I'm already geared up for it then!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Thanks Paul, I'm just curious as to how one determines where
a number like 4.76 is.
This is the number I get with the 1.7x on a 2.8 lens.
Is it the amount of light one would get at F/4 divided by 1.7,
which puts it nearer 5.6. Or is it closer to 1/2 stop?
You're right, it has no real practical
yep. it's a vicious cycle
Cotty wrote:
This chain of events always happens.
Cheers,
Cotty
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
Mark Roberts wrote:
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
about folk going what I remeber is
(aside from you and better half and Doug, that is)
I'll be there with my wife (French) and my brother in law (Bob).
annsan the always discombobulated yatahyatahs
OK Ken is your
I'm getting rather tired of all this OT chatter.
But I hope all goes wheel for you.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 9:25 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My London PDML 2005 Gallery, at last...
Cotty
On 24/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
discombobulated, unleashed:
I am planning to bring my favorites done whilst taking the darkroom class
the past few
winters. I have
several 11x14's i want to bring if i can find something nice to carry them.
Also a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/24 Tue PM 01:52:38 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Follow me, chaps!
In a message dated 5/24/2005 4:40:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/24 Tue PM 02:15:29 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My London PDML 2005 Gallery, at last...
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye.jpg
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/24 Tue PM 02:25:09 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My London PDML 2005 Gallery, at last...
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to ride 8-)
Next: puncture
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/24 Tue PM 02:21:31 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: My London PDML 2005 Gallery, at last...
I'm getting rather tired of all this OT chatter.
But I hope all goes wheel for you.
Yes, we wouldn't want to derail your
I guess normal is:
* faster ?
* less power consumption
while Microdrive is:
* cheaper :D
While I'm at it, does High Speed card really matter in a D/Ds? Or is
it only useful when reading back in a card reader on the Computer?
--
Thibouille
--
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half way between 4 and 5.6?
And where does 4.76 fall? This is a 2.8 lens with the
SMCP-F 1.7x converter.
I'm guessing there is a simple multiplier for this but
with my limited knowledge
Just re-subscribed after a 13 Day photo shoot of Dance.
The Dance was an Eisteddfod of dance with a mix of Ballet,
tap, jazz, cultural, contemporary and others.
My job was to capture each act digitally for sale during
the Eisteddfod.
Equipment
2 x *istD
1 x 70-200mm 2.8 Tamaron AF
1 x 50mm 1.4
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
Thanks Paul, I'm just curious as to how one determines where
a number like 4.76 is.
This is the number I get with the 1.7x on a 2.8 lens.
Is it the amount of light one would get at F/4 divided by 1.7,
which puts it nearer 5.6. Or is it closer to 1/2
Don Sanderson wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half way between 4 and 5.6?
4.76 :-)
And where does 4.76 fall?
Half way between 4 and 5.6 :-)
Or in other words, f4.76 is 1/4 of a stop slower than f4 and 1/4 of a
stop faster than f5.6
This is a
I see this group axles at going around like this...
We will all soon tyre of this...
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 24, 2005 10:06 AM
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My London PDML 2005 Gallery, at last...
damn that's a
OK Ken is your wife's name French
Yes (her maiden name), but I use it as her first name.
taking a little poll of those going to be there
what they are more curious about
I'm partial to your western scenics
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use both 1GB Flash and 1GB microdrives. I find no important noticeable
difference in performance. I just bought a 4GB microdrive for $160. Have
not put in camera yet.
In my opinion the price difference more than outweighs any performance
concerns. As far as reliability, I've had no
Aaagh!
I got some numbers wrong. :-(
See below.
Steve Jolly wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half way between 4 and 5.6?
4.76 :-)
And where does 4.76 fall?
Half way between 4 and 5.6 :-)
Or in other
damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to ride 8-)
Next: puncture jokes.
Guess you spoke too soon...
This chain of events always happens.
Good thing I'm already geared up for it then!
You're in the frame!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On 24/5/05, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
yep. it's a vicious cycle
Can you handle it?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Microdrives don't work well, and may even fail to work, at high altitudes,
above 9,000 feet.
From IBM:
The Microdrive does need AIR to float the heads and typically above
10,000 ft the mass of the air is too low and the drive requires a
pressurized environment similar to an aircraft or
Presuming a constant rate of shots per day, that means about 35,000 frames
with one camera in ten days. Wow!
I don't know the life expectancy of an *istD, but you must take the record
for using it up in the least amount of time. OTOH a job like that should
pay for all the *istDen (*istDs is
Glad you said that. I couldn't work out how you got those numbers, but
didn't want to argue with a nuclear physicist!
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:26:37 +0100, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaagh!
I got some numbers wrong. :-(
See below.
Steve Jolly wrote:
Don
Well, not so great, kind of boring, actually. But here is is. :-)
The California state flower is the California poppy. Which is a wildflower --
basically a weed. Because it is a weed it tends to grow by roadsides, and in
some inaccessible places like on the sides of a steep hills.
It's a
So don't use it in those applications... that specification does not equate
with 'don't work well'.
For you who lives essentially at sea level, it wouldn't be a problem.
Luminous Landscape has an article regarding microdrive usage.
John Forbes wrote:
Glad you said that. I couldn't work out how you got those numbers, but
didn't want to argue with a nuclear physicist!
Fair enough - particle beams at dawn can get a little messy... ;-)
S
Amusing.
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
Which was exactly the point of the post. Some people don't know about the
limitations of the drives, and many people who live at lower elevations
take trips and vacations into the mountains. In many parts of the world
that means elevations above 9000 feet. Just driving around the western
part
Wait till Frank sees it.
Doug Brewer wrote:
damn that's a big bicycle
Mark Roberts wrote:
Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent collection, Gianco. I especially like the one
called The Eye. I was looking for a good abstract
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 1:13 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PAW and a Question
Hi!
This works for me. The light play is quite attractive.
However, I find
the crooked shade on the lower lamp
There's a neat little utility called Fcalc from a company called Tangentsoft
http://www.tangentsoft.net/
The version that runs under windows is free.
It's worth downloading for help file, which contains the all the
formulas used, alone.
It includes an Fstop calculator
The multiplier isn't
Thanks Cory!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cory Papenfuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:07 AM
To: PDML
Subject: Re: F stop question
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half
Thanks Steve! Got it!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Steve Jolly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:27 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: F stop question
Aaagh!
I got some numbers wrong. :-(
See below.
Steve Jolly wrote:
Don
Kevin Waterson wrote:
Just re-subscribed after a 13 Day photo shoot of Dance.
The Dance was an Eisteddfod of dance with a mix of Ballet,
tap, jazz, cultural, contemporary and others.
My job was to capture each act digitally for sale during
the Eisteddfod.
Equipment
2 x *istD
1 x 70-200mm 2.8
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:15:29AM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye2.jpg
damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to
I'm not sure that a high speed card is even necessary for transferring
to the computer. The camera doesn't actually take much advantage of it.
I use a USB 2.0 hub and my not particularly special Lexar 1gig card
takes about 2 minutes to xfer to the computer. If you can fill up
another card in
Thanks Peter, I just downloaded it.
Don
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 11:45 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: F stop question
There's a neat little utility called Fcalc from a company called
Tangentsoft
Not a problem at all Shel. It's just that you started out with a blanket
statement Microdrives don't work well, and I thought that was a misleading
assertion.
For many people they work just fine. It is good to know their altitude
limitations, as you said. I don't work as well at 10,000 ft
...
just a pair of little and easy scripts
Thanks. Perhaps I'll fool with them when I get back from my travel.
let us know...
I don't have a lot of time to do an analysis of GIMP vs Photoshop CS
vs Photoshop Elements 3,
I can understand...
but it isn't so much the feature
Untitled is none too shabby. I like it. It might be a little stronger with
more of a vertical format.
I don't know where you're located but I've heard Gorman is one of the main
places for poppy shooting, although I've heard this wasn't an especially good
year for poppies. With all the rain on
Actually what i said is that they don't work well =at high altitudes=, not
that they don't work well.
Glad we cleared that up.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 5/24/2005 10:02:27 AM
Subject: RE: CF card: normal or Microdrive?
Not a
I guess we'll have to pedal this thread somewhere else. I heard it was BARred
here.
But we could then start a chain letter.
I better stop before I get CRANKy.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 24, 2005 11:32 AM
To: pentax list
In a message dated 5/24/2005 10:14:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't feel bad in your poppy quest. Geo's book is the result of over 15 yrs
of poppy shooting.
Kenneth Waller
==
Well, that's true. Thanks. I looked at the book, but didn't buy it. Right,
he's
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another GFM photo
I am planning to bring my favorites done whilst taking the darkroom class
the past few
winters. I have
several 11x14's i want to bring if i can find something nice to carry
them.
Also a few from the
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: Who started the enablement here anyway?
Cesar looked for someone to blame for his recent acquisitions:
Mike Johnston actually started it. Many have been happy to continue with his
work.
I think of it as a fine legacy, corrupting
With 1 gig CF cards now selling for eighty bucks or so, I can't think of any
good reason to go with a microdrive. The fewer moving parts, the better.
Paul
Actually what i said is that they don't work well =at high altitudes=, not
that they don't work well.
Glad we cleared that up.
Shel
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll see if I can't dig up my portfolio.
Oh, I won't be offended if you can't find it: I eat enough humble pie at
these events anyway...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
That's a very handy little program, I got the Palm OS
version too.
It's crude but for $8.00 worth it.
I see they'll have a new Palm version soon for $15.00.
Thanks Peter,
Don
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 11:45 AM
To:
Hi!
I guess normal is:
* faster ?
* less power consumption
while Microdrive is:
* cheaper :D
While I'm at it, does High Speed card really matter in a D/Ds? Or is
it only useful when reading back in a card reader on the Computer?
I've got 2 1GB Sandisk Ultra II cards... They work just fine.
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
For those who might be interested, this page has a breakaway photo of the
drive, as well as other information. Kind of interesting if you've never
seen the inside of one of these puppies ;-))
http://www.steves-digicams.com/microdrive.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another GFM photo
I am planning to bring my favorites done whilst taking the darkroom class
the past few
winters. I have
several 11x14's i want to bring if i can find
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
Whooo, boy! I can't even read the headlines on that paper, it's so
soft! ;-)
keith whaley
I agree at the 1GB point, but compare at the 4GB capacity and microdrives
are significantly less. I'm taking some long trips where I want more
storage than 1GB so I don't have to manage alot of CF's.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
I just worry about putting all my eggs in one basket. I wouldn't want a 4 gig
CF card either, although I think CF is less likely to fail than a microdrive. I
carry 4 1 gig cards and 3 half gig cards. They'll fit in a pocket. I don't feel
encumbered. And should one fail, I won't lose all my
In a message dated 5/24/2005 11:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
Whooo, boy! I can't
I agree in principle, and I plan on emptying the 4GB daily or more often if
I fill it up sooner. I, like most people, tend to split the finest of hairs
on things like this and then split them again. I'm trying to become less
like myself. :)
There's no guarantees. With film, it could be bad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/24/2005 11:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Hi Boris -
I suppose the critic meant split composition in that the image can be seen
as having to competing centers of interest in the form of the two lamps.
Personally I like a lot of what is going on here in terms of placing the
main elements of the shot along the diagonal and in terms of
Nukes vaporize the mess...
Regards,
Bob...
A picture is worth a thousand words,
but it uses up three thousand times the memory.
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Forbes wrote:
Glad you said that. I couldn't work out how you got those
And you can tell by how poorly I composed the last paragraph that a few more
bottles of Italian wine is exactly what I need.
Tom C.
In my case, saving money on a 4GB microdrive (only $160)... 4 1GB CF crads
would be $250-$280, a 4GB flash is $400+. Buys a few bottles of Italian
wine.
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
