Jim Hemenway wrote:
At one time several years ago it wasn't all that risky. But now, and
especially if the emails were from two different people, I'd play it
safe too.
For some reason I can't get TinyUrls based on an ebay url to work.
What was the final price?
Jim
Derby Chang wrote:
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/9/2005 6:36:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..but, as he pointed out, the two emails came from TWO SEPARATE EMAIL
ADDRESSES. There is a good chance that neither of them are actually
the original seller, and they're just
In a message dated 9/10/2005 12:04:59 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Weirdly though, I also got the same emails in My Messages in my ebay
account, as well as my normal email. Hmm.
D
==
Hmmm. So maybe ebay could get a lead on them.
Probably not, but not all scammers
Wise decision!
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. september 2005 00:31
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: sniff why do they taunt me. Suspicious ebay emails
I was outbid on a 15mm yesterday. Here's
In a message dated 9/7/2005 5:19:30 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I keep hoping Paul Stenquist will honor us with a GESO of his Dream Cruise
photos. I live in Detroit, but have never been to The Cruise since I HATE
CROWDS!!!
In the hope that he will reciprocate, here's a
What I mean is that I would like blacker, shinier, blacks, as you would
expect on a print from a negative.
John
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:20:53 +0100, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
Brutally honest, rather than brutal and honest, I think.
I like the composition and the
I asked that myself before commenting on your picture, and the answer is
almost (to my taste). However, that's just me. That's a perfectly executed
picture which only lacks a pinch of salt. That also applies to many of my
pictures, hence I know what I'm saying ;-)
Dario
- Original
Boris,
You might be right. I've sent a private email with a WOW attachment as I
can't upload to the web at the moment.
J
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 06:23:54 +0100, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
Brutally honest, rather than brutal and honest, I think.
I like the composition
On 9/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Sounds like the high bidder backed out and the seller is now trying to sell
it on the side without ebay getting their cut. They can say it didn't sell,
period, that way.
A classic way that a dishonest eBayer will drive up the price on
On 10/9/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
from a megapixels point of view, they have settled. higher frame rate has
its cost. on the film side of things, the tradeoff never had to be made in
the same way. a piece of film has the same resolution in every camera body,
as JCO is fond of
On 9/10/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/9/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But he tried 9786 times to get it *just right*.
HCB said, Your first 10,000 photos are your worst.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Because of my ebay depression sniff, I went out with trusty 77mm Ltd
to take some pics of the Youth Fashion Design Awards in the city today.
OK, this isn't really groundbreaking stuff, and definitely isn't hard at
all. But it did give me an instant cure.
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. september 2005 10:31
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO - In The Tower
What I mean is that I would like blacker, shinier, blacks, as you would
Some time ago somoene aske about where to post photographs for free.
Can anyone please dirct me to this thread?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Tokina 80-200/2.8 AT-X AF
I got this from a PDMLer, but with one caveat.
Then I got the 80-400, so this has sat in its box and I've hardly touched it.
So it should go.
It's the AF version.
Here's the caveat:
The zoom ring has some play, so you simply keep it pulled back when
turning it.
Two more.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/PDML_misc/earring.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/PDML_misc/blue.htm
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
I have been using RawShooter for some weeks now. Love the program.
But for some reason it will not start anymore. It doesnt respond at all
when I'm clicking the icon. Same thing is happening (or not happening) when
I'm trying to start it by clicking the exe file. The problem started after I
had
I believe you are referring to a thread I started Recomendations on where
to upload public images 02.07.05. Got the mails stored at my computer, if
thats the one, I can forward them off list.
BTW why do you ask?
I see you are using flickr.com. I'm using them to, and I don't see any
reason to
I keep forgetting it
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original Message-
From: Graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 11:44 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO: The Dream Cruise
Changed your name again have you, Dorian?
graywolf
I think Kenneth is refering to something like this stuck to the 4-way
controller: http://tinyurl.com/9f3pz
Fred, see my improved pad:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/temp/pad-istd.jpg
Thanks, guys - now I see what you mean - I'm gonna see if I can find one of
those critters...
Fred
Wow! Is $800 the usual going price for a 15mm?
Jim
Derby Chang wrote:
Jim Hemenway wrote:
At one time several years ago it wasn't all that risky. But now, and
especially if the emails were from two different people, I'd play it
safe too.
For some reason I can't get TinyUrls based on an
Hello Colling. Very intersting:
Which body have ypu used it with? (I use *ist D And MZ-S) (why does it lose
contact - is the contact conection wireing inside the lens damanged and may
be reapaired? I would need to have thos repaired - I guess 100UISD for a
reparair would be OK. I shoot concert
I know the reason for my trouble now. It is a trial version ;-)
Somebody said it was free, but that turned out to be wrong.
The funny part was that it expired at the same moment I had that power down
in my house.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of
RawShooter Essentials IS free.
As far as I can see it's still Pixmantecs
only RawShooter product.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 8:42 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: RawShooter problems
I know the
It shouldn't be so. Mine still works, and the manufacturer continues saying
it's free forever.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: RawShooter problems
I know the reason for
Don just said:
RawShooter Essentials IS free.
As far as I can see it's still Pixmantecs
only RawShooter product.
Thats what I thought at first.
I Did a bit more research on the subject. The licence agreement says this:
4. TERM. If the Software that was distributed to you was labeled as a
This gives me a headache. I'm not used to such heavy thinking ;-)
Think I'll take my dog for a walk.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Don just said:
RawShooter Essentials IS free.
As far as I can see it's still Pixmantecs
only RawShooter product.
That’s what I thought at first.
I Did a bit more research on the subject. The licence agreement says this:
4. TERM. If the Software that was
I've just downloaded (and registered) - we'll see what happens in 15 days !
Rob W
-Original Message-
From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 September 2005 15:18
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RawShooter problems
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Don just said:
Hey Gang ... Has anyone seen or heard from Rob? I sent him a private email
last week that has gone unanswered. Seems like it's been a month or so
since his pixels have appeared here.
Shel
Am I paranoid or perceptive?
September, 2005: DIWA (Digital Imaging Websites Association), a world-wide
organization of collaborating websites, today announces that Pentax has
received their first DIWA Award for a D-SLR camera. Their *istDS model is
honored with a Silver medal for outstanding test results.
To read the
Get Phase One / Capture One LE. Cheap and simply brilliant, easy and
efficient. I wouldn't want to shoot RAW without it :-)
It costs less than a 512 MB CF card. There's a trial version available. It's
Danish, originally made for Professional MF-digital backs for Rolleiflex and
others - and it's
On 10/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hey Gang ... Has anyone seen or heard from Rob? I sent him a private email
last week that has gone unanswered. Seems like it's been a month or so
since his pixels have appeared here.
Same here.
I telephoned him last week and left a
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Cotty wrote:
On 10/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hey Gang ... Has anyone seen or heard from Rob? I sent him a private email
last week that has gone unanswered. Seems like it's been a month or so
since his pixels have appeared here.
Same here.
I
Superb Boris!
All I need is a god chair to sit at ;-)
I could spend hours there, watching the light and the delicate lines.
A god chair? Does that mean you're a deity? Should we start sacrificing
virgins (and Canons) to you, in all your godly splendor?
;-)
John Celio
--
I noticed a couple of web sites mention that the istDS is supposed to come
with CR-2016 Lithium Batteries for the date function. I didn't see such a
battery in the package I received, nor can I find any mention of it in the
copy of the manual that I have. This is one of those little button
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I noticed a couple of web sites mention that the istDS is supposed to come
with CR-2016 Lithium Batteries for the date function. I didn't see such a
battery in the package I received, nor can I find any mention of it in the
copy of the manual that I have. This is one of
RawShooter may not be the best program in the marked. But thats the one I
am using. I'm in the face of learning editing. I think learning a new
interface, and a new approach, isn't the wisest thing to do now.
I'm not saying your advice is a bad one ;-)
I simply don't believe this is the right
Odd, as it's noted the camera comes with the battery on the Pentax site as
well as elsewhere oh well, one less thing to be concerned about.
Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Adam Maas
I suspect that's confusion on the part of the websites. The D comes with
a CR-2016, the DS
Never mind the Canons, but virgins? ...
No. It's not like that. But I admit I like the idea.
It was simple typo. I am (a) go(o)d at making typos ;-)
In fact I believe your just pulling my leg. Thats a mean thing to do
towards a man who is giving you a compliment.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just
Thought I was speaking to Boris here. Forget my last sentence.
But John: You are mean.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Tim
Rob told me, off list on July 20, that I will be away for a month or so in
August.
It was a bit of an open-ended time frame, so I wouldn't report him MIA just
yet.
regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Gang ... Has anyone seen
the DS does not use a button battery.
Godfrey
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: CR-2016 Lithium Batteries for istDS
Date: Sat Sep 10, 2005 8:51 am
Size: 472 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I noticed a couple of web sites mention that the istDS is
Does anyone have experience of LED lighting panels in photography?
Although there are commercial products available, it should not be
that difficult for the electronics buff to make a couple of panels
quite cheap. White high intensity LEDs are avaialble for about $50
per 100 and that
I've had the latest version installed and in use now
for about 3 1/2 months, no problems so far.
(Ver 1.1.3, Build 15)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Robert Whitehouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 9:25 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE:
Hi
Anyone could tell me the major functional difference between MZ-5 and MZ-3? I
may choose one of them. Thanks.
--
__
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.asiamail.com
Send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
Powered by Outblaze
There is little difference, except a faster shutter speed on the 3.
But this comparing the MZ-3 and the MZ-5n.
The MZ-5 has less features and doesn't sound or feel as well built
as the newer 5n version.
I've not owned the 3 but I have 2 5n's and am very pleased.
The specs for them can be found
Look at Dimitrov's website: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
MZ-3 30 ~ 1/4000 sec., flash sync.: 1/125 ~ 30
MZ-5n 30 ~ 1/2000 sec., flash sync.: 1/100 ~ 30
MZ-5 30 ~ 1/2000 sec., flash sync.: 1/100 ~ 30
I guess the speed issues are the most obvous an important differences. 1/125
flash sync is not
... I meant of course Shutter Priority Mode; Tv.
Camera must set Aperture.
BTW: www.Photodo.com rates the Sigma EX 2.8 70-200mm APO above the
compeditors from Pentax and Tokina!!
Amazing, isn't it?
Grade: 3.9 35mm/MF Sigma AF 70-200/2,8 APO EX HSM
Grade: 3.4 35mm/AF Tokina AT-X AF 80-200/2,8
Because of my ebay depression sniff, I went out with trusty 77mm Ltd
to take some pics of the Youth Fashion Design Awards in the city today.
OK, this isn't really groundbreaking stuff, and definitely isn't hard at
all. But it did give me an instant cure.
Hi!
You might be right. I've sent a private email with a WOW attachment as
I can't upload to the web at the moment.
John, I received your off-list message. I can see what you were trying
to say. I usually am rather afraid of increasing contrast as it usually
means that smoothness of
Does that mean the S loses its setting if you don't use it for 48
hours? Or only if the main batteries are removed for 48 hours?
On Sep 10, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Odd, as it's noted the camera comes with the battery on the Pentax
site as
well as elsewhere oh well, one
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Frankie Lee wrote:
Anyone could tell me the major functional difference between MZ-5 and MZ-3? I
may choose one of them. Thanks.
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/bodies/MZ-ZX/index.html
and the links hanging off it. The -5n is closer to the -3 than to the
-5. When looking for
The photos are very nice. The clothes are pretty wierd.
Found the answer in the FAQ
RSE does not launch.
If RSE did not close gracefully, there is a chance that it will not launch
the next time that you go to use it. If this should ocur, please download
this file and run it (double-click) from anywhere in your system. This
should clear up the problem
Smaller, lighter lenses are preferable, but the extra stop of the Tokina is
also desirable. Maybe I can find one somewhere and check the quality.
Working with a slower lens, if the quality (i.e., the desired
characteristics) is superior, is worthwhile. Thanks!
On Sep 10, 2005, at 12:29, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Does that mean the S loses its setting if you don't use it for 48
hours? Or only if the main batteries are removed for 48 hours?
The latter.
But I always toss a set of fresh batteries in RIGHT AWAY when I
remove dead ones for charging.
Feroze wrote:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26041
I don't know this newspaper, for the UK members is it a real paper or
one of those I saw Elvis rags???
It's not a newspaper, it's an online technology news website. They have
a reasonable reputation for getting things right.
S
The MZ-S is a very recommendable piece of photographic hardware.
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. september 2005 19:33
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: MZ-5
On Sun, 11 Sep
Funny you should bring this up Shel because I just got home (within
the last 1 hour) from spending a thoroughly enjoyable day and night
(14:00-23:30) walking around Fremantle and Perth with him (He asked me
if anyone had noticed he was missing and I said Nah, and he just
laughed.). We spent the
I love the colours patterns in Blue. Really nice.
Dave
On 9/10/05, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two more.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/PDML_misc/earring.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/PDML_misc/blue.htm
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Øsleby wrote:
This gives me a headache. I'm not used to such heavy thinking ;-)
Think I'll take my dog for a walk.
Try resetting your computer to a date previous to the expiry. If that
works, it's time limited. This is not a foolproof methodology..
Tim
Mostly harmless (just
only if the main batteries are removed for 48 hrs or more.
Godfrey
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: CR-2016 Lithium Batteries for istDS
Date: Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:29 am
Size: 692 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Does that mean the S loses its
About that, though usually a bit more.
Jim Hemenway wrote:
Wow! Is $800 the usual going price for a 15mm?
Jim
Derby Chang wrote:
Jim Hemenway wrote:
At one time several years ago it wasn't all that risky. But now, and
especially if the emails were from two different people, I'd play it
I don't think the DS uses such a battery. It's probably a cut and paste
error. They just recycled the
descriptive text of the *ist-D, for their DS review.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I noticed a couple of web sites mention that the istDS is supposed to come
with CR-2016 Lithium Batteries for the
MZ5 No DOF, 100 X sync, 1/2000 top shutter speed.
MZ3 DOF, 125 X sync, 1/4000 top shutter speed.
Everything else is essentially the same.
The MZ5n has DOF preview by the way.
Frankie Lee wrote:
Hi
Anyone could tell me the major functional difference between MZ-5 and MZ-3? I
may choose one of
I've decided to vote for paranoid. (Not necessarily because of this
message...) ;-)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hey Gang ... Has anyone seen or heard from Rob? I sent him a private email
last week that has gone unanswered. Seems like it's been a month or so
since his pixels have appeared here.
I don't understand how this can be a competition.
The Pentax 645 isn't even close to being launched as a digital version, is
it???
This seem to way ahead of anything ver made by Pentax.
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cotty
Thanks Jens,
They say brevity is the soul of wit.
J
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:30:21 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. september 2005 10:31
I finally had a chance to see this. (Everyone deleted the url. I wish
people would leave at least the location reference when they comment.)
In any case, I like it very much. Nice balance of highlight and shadow.
An interesting, well executed lighting study. Good work.
Paul
On Sep 10, 2005, at
A night in the life of a celeb chaser. The slide show is amusing.
Imagine, snaparazzi with a conscience. Sort of.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2125481/nav/tap1/
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
Thank you, Ken. The close-ups are my old A 100 f4 that I bought a few years
ago off another list member. Not a bad lens, actually.
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 10:09 AM
To:
A couple of months ago I purchased a bargain-grade 17-28 Pentax Fisheye
Zoom from KEH. After receiving the lens and checking it out I wrote to
the list as it appeared to me to be mis-assembled (the lens, not the
list). It was focusing well past infinity at the infinity mark, and at
17mm zoom its
We celebrated my grand daughter's first birthday today. My wife was
going to feed her a piece of cake with a spoon, but Grace beat her to
it. She picked it up and got right to it. That's my girl.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3717131size=lg
DA 16-45/4 with the Sigma 500Super and
HI all.
I'm not a fan of the dull colour or the background, but everyone i have shown
this to
thinks its a
very nice photo.
Thus proving, i'mm to hard on my self.LOL
Just a great shot for the family album. BTW, what are you making prints of
the family shots you've been presenting, putting them in an album in the
traditional manner, or is everything on CD or DVD and the computer?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
As a side bar.
My daughter took her istD with her last weekend to a friends cottage for the
Labour Day
weekend. She
played with it for a while and really liked it. She might dump her rebel.
One down, many to go.g
Dave
September, 2005: DIWA (Digital
Excellent keep sake photo Paul.
Nice colours and sharpness.
Dave
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3717131size=lg
Well, Dave,you're right about a lot of things ...
The laughter and exuberance make this a fine family snap, and the details
in the scene will allow you to remember the time and place for years to
come.
As for the dull color and busy background, well, you're right. Others are
being too easy on
I may be able to attend the Pentax Pixel Party yet LOL Is that black tie?
Shel
Clothing optional.vbg
Hope this one works out Shel. It really is a neat camera(even though i have the
D).
Dave
Hi Shel,
Thanks. I make prints of the best shots. Sometimes I'll gang (9) 4 x 6
prints on a sheet of 13 x 19 paper. Then cut them out and store them in
albums. I'm currently using Epson Premium Lustre. I print a few as 8x12
or 11 x17 for framing. I send jpegs to family members and friends. I
Thanks Shel
I'm kinda going through a bit of a photo funk right now. Not to happy with my
horse work,
and not
much time, just yet, for my personal work,but when i look at this shot i get a
nice
feeling, so i
forwarded it to the list.
Dave
Well,
Hi Dave ... I'd need a long tie LOL
Thanks for you good wishes. It's hard to imagine getting two duds in a
row, but considering everything, I ain't counting the chickens ...
I'd decided that if the DS couldn't be replaced I'd get one of the istD's
that are on the KEH site. A bit more spendy,
i understand and my guess that in about 3 years, they will be selling full
frame sensors at all but the entry level cameras. however, that is about 3
years too late for me.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent:
he mentioned he would be in the bush for a while. i thought time was up
though.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Rob Studdert
I telephoned him last week and
I like this. The light is very subdued and somewhat flat, that's why
the color isn't vibrant. But I prefer this kind of subtlety to direct
sun and hard shadow. As far as the background is concerned, it's what
was there at this magic moment. Nice shot.
Paul
On Sep 10, 2005, at 8:34 PM,
He's on 'oliday, running around the land of Oz. His merchandise keeps
showing up at my front door. Anyone want an FA 50mm 1.4? :-)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 11:17 AM
Subject: Rob
Check 'em out. You may be surprised at what you see ;-))
http://www.donwiss.com/pictures/BrooklynStores/
Shel
Am I paranoid or perceptive?
Classic New Yorker cartoon caption, Dog seated at PC, On the internet,
nobody knows you're a dog.
J.W.L.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 9:53 PM
Subject: Brooklyn Mail Order Photo Stores
Classic New Yorker cartoon caption, Dog seated at PC, On the internet,
nobody knows you're a dog.
J.W.L.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 9:53 PM
Subject: Brooklyn Mail Order Photo Stores
Mark Roberts wrote:
Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Four quick scans. Sorry, no time just yet to clean up the images.
All photos made with E100G and the K1000. The photo of the bear taken
with Tom's A300/f2.8, the eagle handheld with the M200/f4, and the
other two with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/24/2005 12:31:41 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Four quick scans. Sorry, no time just yet to clean up the images.
All photos made with E100G and the K1000. The photo of the bear taken
with Tom's A300/f2.8, the eagle handheld
Fine family shot. The above stated title is very good!
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. september 2005 02:26
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: Paw: As free as a child wants
93 matches
Mail list logo
