- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Snake in Oxford
On 26/10/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Try birds with anything less than 420mm :-)
Easy. Pack em with sawdust first.
Hell, just pluck em first.
William Robb
On 26 Oct 2005 at 12:15, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'm pretty much with you, Godfrey, although it often depends on who I'm
with. I've been with a couple three list members where it's just been the
two of us, and with one fellow I was able to photograph pretty much
unfettered. We'd do our own
David, can you show us a pic of the bag?
All I see are the Adventure 2, 8, 74 and 75.
Which is it most like?
Thanks
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Oswald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 5:46 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Bag enablement
I'll snap a shot and post it later on tonight. Its internal
configuration is most like the Expedition 4 (Model 5574) shown here:
http://www.tamrac.com/5574_lrg.htm
In fact, it's almost identical, though mine has one more partition near
the bottom in the middle section. The Expedition-4 might
Just a quick comment. While looking at the original PEF file for the Pile
of Leaves pic that was recently posted, I noticed that it was shot @ 1600
ISO. I'm quite surprised (and pleased) at how little noise there is, and
noise reduction was turned off in the camera. Maybe I'm too ignorant to
Actually, a correction and apology: It's not Adventure 3, it's
Expedition-3 (the one I have) and here is its picture:
http://www.tamrac.com/5273_lrg.htm
Sorry for the confusion. Yes, it does look that the Expetion 4 is a
couple inches wider. Given that the Expedition-3 holds snugly exactly
1600 can look pretty good, just don't underexpose.
Trying to bring deep shadows up very far looks quite ugly!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 6:35 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: istDS @ 1600 ISO
Just
Thanks David, all clear now! ;-)
I've been looking at the Exp. 4 and 5.
Also the LowePro Trekker AW series.
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Oswald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 6:34 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Bag enablement
On 26 Oct 2005 at 16:34, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just a quick comment. While looking at the original PEF file for the Pile
of Leaves pic that was recently posted, I noticed that it was shot @ 1600
ISO. I'm quite surprised (and pleased) at how little noise there is, and
noise reduction was
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just a quick comment. While looking at the original PEF file for the Pile
of Leaves pic that was recently posted, I noticed that it was shot @ 1600
ISO. I'm quite surprised (and pleased) at how little noise there is, and
noise reduction was turned off in the camera.
On 26 Oct 2005 at 11:15, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If the Pentax DSLRs stop being the tool that does best for me, I'll
sell what I have and move on to something else that does, not whine
and moan about why Pentax isn't making what I think I want/need. I
won't make much about it; I'm
I see that LowePro now has their own answer to the
Tamrac Velocity Sling Bag.
http://lowepro.com/Products/Sling_Bags/All_Weather_Cover/
Looks interesting.
Don
On 26 Oct 2005 at 15:12, Mark Roberts wrote:
A lot of people feel the need to punish Pentax for not giving them
what they want by posting this kind of thing.
I don't really think that there is any value in considering that people here
posting their views, discoveries or opinion regarding
i just did an inventory, as i hadn't been counting. since buying the *istD,
i have bought the following Pentax equipment to be part of or supplement the
use of my *istD.
new - 2 Limiteds, 1 FA*, 1 D-FA, 3 DA, 2 FA, and a Pentax spotting scope
with the Pentax K adapter, a pair of Pentax's best
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:55:01 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/05, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
Totally agree!
Very well done, sir.
I liked the series with Cesar at the pub and his doing street
photography, but the next series with up close and personal shots just
took
it's just a firmware update. we can back you out to Cotty V1.0 if we have
to.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
I've booked my
That makes perfect sense. JIT inventory is the hot thing in manufacturing.
Unfortunately all to often its NIT inventory (not in time).
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
I think that Pentax is trying to keep
Guys-- I'm putting three items of Pentax gear up on Ebay. First is a 50mm
2.8 SMC A-Macro lens, perfect glass and diaphram, tiny bit of paint chipping
on the bottom, overall very good condition.
Second is a 50mm 1.4 SMC A, very good to excellent condition.
Third is the most interesting item
Any opinions on these 2 lenses
Yes
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Schork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A* 200 f2.8 ED versus A* 300 f4
I'm considering the A* 200 f2.8 ED and the A* 300 f4 for use on my istDS.
I really like the fact that both are relatively small
I worked on the plastic gun on that pic I posted last week. I've never
seen a real Uzi, and I doubt that this even comes close. But I do think
it looks somewhat less plastic than it did as shot (so to speak). If
any of you gun guys have a hint on how it might make it look more
realistic, I'm
Looks better ... but still not like a real Uzi. Did you go to one of the
numerous Uzi pages and check out the gun pix?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
I worked on the plastic gun on that pic I posted last week. I've never
seen a real Uzi, and I doubt that this even comes
my friend who asked me about Nikon and Canon DSLRs doesn't care what is in
the viewfinder so long as he can locate the subject. the camera is supposed
to do everything else, and that is the way he wants it. the reason for going
to a DSLR is solely to reduce shutter lag.
Herb
-
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, a few pics up. Sorry - 18 pics on this page, not
suitable for
dial-up unless you're prepared for a bit of a wait.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/snake.html
Also, a Photo Essay of my wife in conversation with Cesar:
And what would be the reason for a camera at all? Just catching
memories or some other purpose?
--
Bruce
Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 5:27:31 PM, you wrote:
HC my friend who asked me about Nikon and Canon DSLRs doesn't care what is in
HC the viewfinder so long as he can locate the subject.
On a recent trip, one of my Tamrac bags gave out
I had a durability issue with a (several years old)Tamrac bag about 10 years
ago. I advised them over the phone about the concern. They asked me to
return it to them. I did they not only took care of my concern but up
graded features on my
I wouldn't have guessed looking at your nicely rendered image, but I'm
not surprised. I've found that with a good exposure and no cropping,
ISO 1600 pics can be quite nice. Noise reduction only kicks in on long
exposures. I find that the images are cleaner than those one might get
from ISO
Cotty,
It is always such a pleasure to look through your essays and
galleries. You have a great eye and a way of capturing it that is so
nice and appealing.
Thanks for taking the time to put them together and sharing them with
us.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 4:47:38
Good idea, Shel. Thanks.
On Oct 26, 2005, at 8:24 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Looks better ... but still not like a real Uzi. Did you go to one of
the
numerous Uzi pages and check out the gun pix?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
I worked on the plastic gun on that pic I
the assumption among many professional photographers is that you have the
skill or you wouldn't be there. what you list says that in areas where
manual focus skill or potential for lens flare is most important, Pentax has
an edge. otherwise, any other area, Pentax is at best even when the
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Just try to consider that not everyone is in the same position as yourself
and
do be thankful that you can indulge yourself in such a fashion, I'm sure
many
other PDMLers couldn't but would
what is the source of this news ?
Is it Official ?
I am curious -
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some nice Nikon stuff news just before its official
annoucement on 1
november ;-) It is supposed to have 10.5 MPix, 5,5
fps. APS-C but at price
level (around 1500-200$) that
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Skills - was Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
the assumption among many professional photographers is that you have the
skill or you wouldn't be there.
That is not a safe assumption for them to make. I've run into a lot of pro
so what's exactly the problem? if you google pentax service manuals,
your site comes up as the first link.
now, if someone has more money than brains, and decides to buy the
same on ebay, what's wrong with that? why don't you want people charging
money for them? and why don't you sell them on
On 26 Oct 2005 at 18:33, William Robb wrote:
There's more to this than a camera body. I could have stayed with a nice
higher spec camera system with Nikon, Lord knows the F4 was a hell of a lot
more
camera than the LX, but I wanted the look that Pentax lenses give. I think
about
changing
once you have captured a burst, the *istD takes a long time to write to the
card, especially in RAW mode. until it clears a frame's worth, you can't
take another picture. #2 here was taken in windy conditions with patchy sun
and mostly clouds. the sun lit up the entire field of blueberry bushes
Hey, I hadn't seen this. Cool! Thaks Godfrey for posting it.
j
On 10/18/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one is obviously titled Juan And His New LX ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/41q.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
enjoy!
Godfrey
On 26 Oct 2005 at 17:38, Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
what is the source of this news ?
Is it Official ?
I am curious -
All the images were sourced from the
http://www.nikon.co.uk/press_room/downloads/
Not Nikon Japan but not too unofficial either.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
highest quality large JPEG.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: RE: *ist D without a card
Shel queried:
What is ***L?
I was wondering that myself. My best guess is that it's hell for
Bruce,
With all respect, I understand what you are saying, I just don't agree. I
may be adept at creating self-fulfilling prophecies regarding myself :-( ,
but not for the DSLR-buying public.
There are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands of shoppers out
there that are going to
not saying anything is tantamount to saying there isn't anything to improve.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
A lot of people feel
Selling manuals on eekBay is fine.
Taking _someone elses_ hard work and selling THAT is not.
They've taken Marks cleaned up PDFs and are offering them
for sale, when Mark offers them for free.
Not nice at all.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
You might start by looking at photos of Mac-10, M10, or M11 variants.
Your toy gun is based on these, not an UZI. Besides, I think your
touch up doesn't look too bad.
There are a couple of photos here:
http://www.firearmsid.com/Feature%20Articles/012001/Mac10History.htm
On 10/26/05, Paul
Try birds with anything less than 420mm :-)
Easy. Pack em with sawdust first.
then nail them to their perch
Thanks Scott. I found a gun called Micro Uzi that is qutie similar.
I'll check out your link.
On Oct 26, 2005, at 8:52 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
You might start by looking at photos of Mac-10, M10, or M11 variants.
Your toy gun is based on these, not an UZI. Besides, I think your
touch up
i think most will be like my friend who wants one with a kit lens or two and
that is it. price is super important, and brand name next. they are
dissatisfied with the shutter lag of a PS, and EVFs are horrible. using the
LCD is worse. prices are now low enough to go the next level of
Yes, I read about that as well.
For some reason, however, I can't go to that place.
I can go to http://www.nikon.co.uk/press_room/.
However, can't go to download after that and can't see
download anywhere on that page.
Other thing that led me to doubt is the article on
following link which says
i have been told that the Limiteds and such like the A15 are hand assembled
on a bench. don't know the truth, but it makes sense to me.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:29 PM
Subject: Re:
quality will be there but i think the 200 will be short for many kinds of
wildlife photography. depending on the sport, it may be too short for that
too.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Schork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005
On 26 Oct 2005 at 18:02, Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
Yes, I read about that as well.
For some reason, however, I can't go to that place.
I can go to http://www.nikon.co.uk/press_room/.
However, can't go to download after that and can't see
download anywhere on that page.
Other thing that led me
Didn't think of that. Definitely looks like the micro-UZI. The ring
around the barrel looks more like the MAC, though. But it's a toy, so
it could be some toy designer's fantasy SMG! Either way, the retouch
looks pretty good to my eyes.
On 10/26/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, and that a huge portion of the prospective entry level DSLR owners
everyone is trying to sell to.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Herb Chong pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to
#2 refers to here http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/Temp/.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: Skills - was Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
once you have captured a
That's just more of Rockwell's blathering. He's merely pointing out the
obvious (no D200 in stores today) and making it seem like a revelation.
-Adam
Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
Yes, I read about that as well.
For some reason, however, I can't go to that place.
I can go to
Actually, I don't think his toy was based on the MAC-10 or variants
thereof. It looks much more like an UZI pistol or the Micro UZI. Here are
some links, and everyone can decide for themselves:
First a page about MAC-10's:
http://www.firearmsid.com/Feature%20Articles/012001/Mac10History.htm
I just generated a quick and dirty pano using a pair of files captured using my
old Oly E-10 from a few years back. These images weren't shot with the
intention of stitching, they were shot some minutes apart and at slightly
different focal lengths. However the autostitch.exe application that I
Thanks Glen. Very helpful. I think you're correct. The toy is closest
to the Uzi pistol. I may attempt the knurled cap. In any case, I can
get the shape closer. The metal color and texture are helpful as well.
Paul
On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:28 PM, Glen wrote:
Actually, I don't think his toy was
Amazing image Rob! Thanks and thanks for the lead on the stitcher. Where's
the pianos? Everytime I see 'pano' it registers as the other.
Tom C.
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO Incidental panos #1
Date: Thu,
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
i dunno about this one, so be brutal as you please g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Great exposure balance and framing. Really nice pano job. It's hard to
imagine that it could have been done easily. I wish there were a Mac
version.
Paul
On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I just generated a quick and dirty pano using a pair of files captured
using my
old Oly
I like it Frank! Big, bold, grainy. Burnout in the clouds but that may
actually serve to focus attention on the road. The skid marks make me
wonder if someone was losing it on the way down and hogging the road.
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Nicely composed. I like it. The hard grain and high contrast make it an
unusual rendering of this type of scene.
Paul
On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:58 PM, frank theriault wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback
curve:
I've found ISO 1600 can do remarkably well too, although I usually
try to keep ISO down to 800 if I want very large enlargements. That
is, unless I'm going for a grainy/gritty texture.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just a quick comment. While looking at the
My pleasure. I'd been wondering when you were going to pop in . :-)
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
Hey, I hadn't seen this. Cool! Thaks Godfrey for posting it.
On 10/18/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one is obviously titled Juan And His New LX
On Oct 26, 2005, at 6:41 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I just generated a quick and dirty pano using a pair of files
captured using my
old Oly E-10 from a few years back. These images weren't shot with the
intention of stitching, they were shot some minutes apart and at
slightly
different focal
Very dramatic! I like it.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2005, at 6:58 PM, frank theriault wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback
curve:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
i dunno about this one, so be brutal as you please g
-frank
--
On Oct 26, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
If the Pentax DSLRs stop being the tool that does best for me, I'll
sell what I have and move on to something else that does, not whine
and moan about why Pentax isn't making what I think I want/need. I
won't make much about it; I'm interested
At 09:48 PM 10/26/2005, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Glen. Very helpful.
You're welcome. It's amazing what sort of reference material you can find
on short notice, by using the Google Advanced Image Search:
http://images.google.com/advanced_image_search?hl=en
:)
take care,
Glen
Wow. Now that's saying something! Thank you Godfrey. I'm humbled.
dk
On 10/26/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nicely done, one of the better landscapes I've seen lately. Thanks!
Hi Henk,
Thanks for the comment (and the link - I look forward to browsing through it).
dk
On 10/26/05, Henk Terhell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, great shot!
Abandoned places.. isn't this what romanticism is about to be there?
Henk
PS: One of my favourite sites about abandoned places
On 26 Oct 2005 at 19:18, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't know what position I'm in that others aren't. Equipment that
does the right job is essential to me. It may take a bit of a stretch
to change when or if I need to. If I didn't see a positive financial
return from doing do, then I
That seems to be a bit far fetched, it's been widely remarked that any
well dressed white male willing to give up his own life, could probably
kill a President. There isn't much that can be done to stop that.
Gonz wrote:
I think cell phone transmissions are more difficult to filter through,
Cool shot, Frank. I certainly remember my first time coming down the
mountain in the Xterra. Not sure if it was this curve or another, but
I was paying a bit too much attention the volume knob instead of the
steering wheel. Does the word tight mean anything to you?
Anyway, lovely shot. It's
Now that's sick, (but very funny).
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
If you like sushi, here's a shot (NOT mine) that you will love:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3830030
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:43:00 -0600, William Robb wrote:
The entire flash voltage issue is an invented one.
Not for me it wasn't. I had two older (non-Pentax) flashes that would
both consistently lock up my ZX-5 when they fired. After a handful of
tests, I got rid of them.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:55:18 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
The A* 200 f2.8 ED is a nice lens, it's nice and small but if you
can spring for the FA version you may be more pleased [...]
I've never owned or used the A* 200/2.8, but the FA* 200/2.8 is one of
my favorite lenses. I'm not sure whether
Love it. A lot.
-Marco
On Oct 26, 2005, at 6:58 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
While on this topic, I'm also in the market for a backpack style camera
bag. I've got a bit of a problem finding one that'll fit my race track
kit, though. Does anyone have a suggestion for one that'll hold the
following kit:
*ist D
K or FA 135
FA* 200/2.8
F* 300/4.5
Sigma 400/5.6 APO Macro
DA
High quality large Jpeg.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
Resetting menus in the istDS without a card inserted seems to work. I just
reset several menu items, turned the camera off and on, and the settings
held.
What is ***L?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Williams
I have
On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still debating if i should pick up a 300 for my 6x7.:-)
Brother Dave
You should. I have the old Takumar one and it's pretty good. Or are
you thinking more along the lines of the new ED version?
- Other Brother Dave
Sony will go with Minolta, Panasonic will go with Leitz, at least the
names, who knows where the glass will actually come from...
Gonz wrote:
I'm just wondering how big these companies imagine the DSLR market
really is. I mean doesn't the vast majority just purchase a small
PS? Do they
On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:48 PM, David Savage wrote:
Be careful if you're using an Epson... I seem to recall that the
2100/2200 driver limits roll prints to 44 inches length. Being Epson
software, I expect that you won't find out until after it's printed
the 44 then stopped without any kind of
On Oct 27, 2005, at 1:18 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Nope. I've done 6-foot-long panos on my 2200.
I've done a little more reading and found that the 44-inch limit has
been affecting people in some situations but it can be solved with
changes to the print settings.
No goats about it, No curses, no ivy, no whining. Chicago's best ball
club does what the cubbies never will do. Not just a win, but a
sweep!!!
(Sorry for the outrageously OT post, but I waited all my life for
this:-). Silly, isn't it :-))).
Paul
Doesn't your 1D have a 1.3 crop factor as opposed to the istD's 1.5.
Everything equal your viewfinder image would be noticably larger than
the istD's. (Yeh, I know you know this, Cotty, but I figured it would
not be obvious to everyone who read your post).
graywolf
Stuff is rolling off the printer. PAW 42 and this Other 42p look good
on A3 size paper. The Epson R2400 is a dream to work with too: it
actually does what I intend it to do.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42p.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
enjoy,
Godfrey
On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:19 AM, William Robb wrote:
Seriously funny, though I doubt serious
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006Ivu
Hilarious.
I thought it was the northern hemisphere where the image was right-
way-up.
- Dave
You might try one of the Lowepro CompuTrekkers. You have three very
large lenses there, it's going to be tough.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2005, at 8:29 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
While on this topic, I'm also in the market for a backpack style
camera
bag. I've got a bit of a problem finding one
The ain't shutting down no line to make your A15, Tom. They put them
together in a little job shop in the basement grin. In fact I would
not be suprised to find out that they grind the lens elements on a
numerically contolled grinder and polish them by hand. They probably
haven't made enough
Tom C wrote:
Well he didn't make the same mistake three times...
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Photo Net must read
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:19:30 -0600
Seriously funny, though I
On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:52 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Sony will go with Minolta, Panasonic will go with Leitz, at least
the names, who knows where the glass will actually come from...
Sony's will come from Coke bottles, Panasonic's will come from Pepsi
bottles.
- Dave
Seriously funny, though I doubt serious
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006Ivu
Bill,
This is excellent illustration of YMMV mantra...
This guy made my laff real hard.
Boris
Yes, for a guy who lives in Detroit (well a suburb of Detroit).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Silly, isn't it :-))).
Hi!
I just generated a quick and dirty pano using a pair of files captured using my
old Oly E-10 from a few years back. These images weren't shot with the
intention of stitching, they were shot some minutes apart and at slightly
different focal lengths. However the autostitch.exe application
Hi!
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
i dunno about this one, so be brutal as you please g
Whoa! Frank goes to do wilderness...
Well done, really well done... Remind me to show you some
Hi!
Stuff is rolling off the printer. PAW 42 and this Other 42p look good
on A3 size paper. The Epson R2400 is a dream to work with too: it
actually does what I intend it to do.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42p.htm
It looks like it could've been shot everywhen (is there
But who spent his first 31 years on the South Side of Chicago.
On Oct 27, 2005, at 12:48 AM, graywolf wrote:
Yes, for a guy who lives in Detroit (well a suburb of Detroit).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Paul Stenquist
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin
Subject: Re: Safe voltages for the *stDS flash hotshoe?
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:43:00 -0600, William Robb wrote:
The entire flash voltage issue is an invented one.
Not for me it wasn't. I had two older (non-Pentax) flashes that would
both
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
I love the look of my Pentax lenses too, but short of doing some Canon
lens
mount butchery they really aren't being taken full advantage of due to
Pentax's
poor offerings.
Here we disagree.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin
Subject: Re: Bag enablement (correction)
While on this topic, I'm also in the market for a backpack style camera
bag. I've got a bit of a problem finding one that'll fit my race track
kit, though. Does anyone have a suggestion for one
On 26 Oct 2005 at 22:03, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
I love the look of my Pentax lenses too, but short of doing some Canon
lens
mount butchery they really aren't being taken full advantage of
301 - 400 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
