http://www.worldviewofglobalwarming.org/
No, the EU it is not forced and the only thing it consolidates is
peace and prosperity in Europe - where unlike the US its member states
can leave the union any time they so wish without provoking a civil
war.
A.
On 26 Sep 2004, at 23:20, Keith Whaley wrote:
The E.U. is a forced (yes, it
Certainly his achievement is absolutly fabulous - particualrly given
his health. But I say never say never frank. Sport is littered with
broken records .
A.
On 26 Jul 2004, at 16:30, frank theriault wrote:
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only
until he wins next year (grin).
Absolutely,
What about some form of php driven feedback system on the PUG itself
whereby PDMLers could comment directly on an image a la photosig.com?
Perhaps by interacting more with the PUG site there would be more
traffic and interaction with its content. With the PAWs because an
image is linked
Yes, and that is why for an equivalent focal lenght you get more DOF
with the *ist than with film. Because a 50mm lens has more DOF than a
75mm lens.
A.
On 20 Jul 2004, at 02:36, Don Sanderson wrote:
Tanya, that 50mm lens is still a 50mm, not a 75. You're just using a
piece
out of the middle
Camera companies in general like to sell new lenses as it makes them
more money, so whilst it is possible I dont think you will find Pentax
themselves doing it but rather smaller outfits like Cosina, as they
have with the TM.
A.
On 20 Jul 2004, at 02:40, Peter Loveday wrote:
In the long run I
meddelelse-
Fra: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 20. juli 2004 01:02
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: DOF and digital cameras
Well it is relevant is so far as the discussion was looking at the
merits and demerits of the *istD vis-a-vis a 35mm film system.
A.
On 20 Jul 2004, at 00
Quick question: Super A : linear or circular polarizer?
A.
Many thanks Joe.
A.
On 20 Jul 2004, at 18:23, Joe Wilensky wrote:
Linear -- it's the standard Pentax centerweighted gallium meter in the
prism, which doesn't require the circular polarizer. Though it has TTL
flash metering, it doesn't have the semi-silvered spot on the mirror
that requires
Thats cheap, did you see the one with start price of $900!
I wonder if those who own this lens could comment on whether they think
it is actually worth this sort of money given you could buy a rather
nice SH MF setup for that sort of money.
Would this lens beat say a Rollei 6003 with an 80mm or
: Replacement for the FA 50 and 100 Macros? (Re: Pentax is
Dying)
On 18 Jul 2004 at 16:21, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
You correct Don. DOF is an issue for 1.5x cropped APS digital sensor
cameras. Of course, having said that its only an issue if you enjoy a
shallow DOF. For those who want greater DOF I guess
Yes, but because of the crop factor your 85mm portrait lens is now a
132mm lens. Therefore for a portrait lens you would use say the 50mm,
hence a different DOF, no?
A.
On 19 Jul 2004, at 01:20, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 Jul 2004 at 16:21, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
You correct Don. DOF
Yes, but what about the old 85mm range which is what most people use
for portraits?
A.
On 19 Jul 2004, at 03:53, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 Jul 2004 at 21:40, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Makes no sense, for same AOV you are using shorter lenses and
have a smaller reproduction ratio with APS size
Not where I live they are not, film still outnumbers digital by a long
stretch.
A.
On 19 Jul 2004, at 07:38, William Robb wrote:
Wish what you like, But daily, there are more people using digital
cameras, and fewer using film.
Exaclty, so with the *ist you get greater DOF for the same focal length
or AOV. Which is fine if that is what you want but not gret if you like
shallow DOF without having to resort to a 300mm lens.
A.
On 19 Jul 2004, at 13:23, Don Sanderson wrote:
But with the smaller frame on the *ist D you
:
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Replacement for the FA 50 and 100
Macros? (Re: Pentax is Dying)
Yes, but because of the crop factor your 85mm portrait lens is now
a
132mm lens. Therefore for a portrait lens you would use say the
50mm,
hence a different
Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is
Dying?
Not where I live they are not, film still outnumbers digital by a
long
stretch.
Reread the sentence that you quoted, and formulate a reply based on
what I wrote
Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is
Dying?
Whats to re-read. You say that film outnumbers digital in your part
of
the world, I say that film outnumbers digital in my part of the
world.
Not exactly rocket
I see, so that according to you new spin is meant to mean that as
things stand now more people are using film than digital, but that
more people are using digital than before and less are using film than
before - wow. I spent 4 years at a top English University and I would
never have guessed
: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] OT: DOF and digital cameras
Primarily for William Robb, but usefull for anyone else grapling
with
this issue.
I expected the depth of field in digital cameras to be
significantly
greater than that in 35 mm models. Everybody and his mother knows
Really, so why do you keep insisting that the DOF on an *istD is the
same as on a 35mm film body?
A.
On 19 Jul 2004, at 23:54, William Robb wrote:
Huh?
I am pretty sure I have a handle on depth of field.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam
By all means, please do (or at least back up your assertion with some
form of evidence...)
A.
On 20 Jul 2004, at 00:43, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 19 Jul 2004 at 22:44, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I expected the depth of field in digital cameras to be significantly
greater than that in 35 mm models
/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. juli 2004 23:55
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: OT: DOF and digital cameras
Huh?
I am pretty sure I have a handle on depth of field.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject
Paul,
At the end of the day its gonna be worth what someone wants to pay you
for it. If you use ebay it can vary quite a lot depending on who is
bidding and how much they want it.
The k105/2.8 is indeed very hard to come buy so I guess you would
probably get a good price for it if you sold it
Gringo, the rumor on canon/nikon lists is that they are expecting a MF
digital solution too.
A.
On 18 Jul 2004, at 04:05, El Gringo wrote:
You're so negative Rob, why is that?? It's scheduled for early 2005,
not
exactly that far off now is it? A couple other posters provided some
interesting
Very nice, very decorative - will look nice framed. I like the shallow
DOF very much.
Antonio
On 18 Jul 2004, at 12:22, David Mann wrote:
I had this one printed to 8x12 yesterday so I could frame it (the
glue is drying as I type).
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=18-Jul-2004
are perfectly satisfied with film. It's doubtful that any of us
will be
swayed from our current positions regardless of chemistry vs. physics
or
any other pointless arguments one way or another.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
, and
others
who are perfectly satisfied with film. It's doubtful that any of us
will be
swayed from our current positions regardless of chemistry vs. physics
or
any other pointless arguments one way or another.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Perhaps but I wasnt talking low end 35mm systems. I was talking 35mm
SLR vs digital APS SLR. Pentax *ist Film vs Pentax *istD, for arguments
sake each with the same glass.
A.
On 18 Jul 2004, at 19:39, El Gringo wrote:
Sorry, Thats bullshit. What you get from a digital PS camera easily
exceeds
in the future will focus with perfectly
formed gravity lenses...
-el gringo
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax is Dying?
Gringo,
So film is limited by chemistry and digital sensors
And maybee pigs will fly.
A.
On 18 Jul 2004, at 19:39, El Gringo wrote:
Maybe a thousand years from now,
science will invent a gravity generator, then a portable gravity
generator,
then tiny gravity generators and anti-gravity generators, then maybe
cameras
in the future will focus with
I think the 7 is a follow on from the Mamiya 6 actually.
Antonio
On 18 Jul 2004, at 21:19, graywolf wrote:
Some think of it as a decendant of the Mamiya Press, but I would call
it more of a direct decendant of the Simon Omega Rapid, Koni-Omega,
Rapid Omega 100 (made by Mamiya) line of cameras.
I stand corrected. Not having seen one of the prints you refer to i was
guided by poor quality stuff you get on the high-street. Obviously
there is more to it than that.
A.
On 18 Jul 2004, at 20:08, Bill Owens wrote:
Antonio wrote:
Not to mention the poor quality of those digital prints.
Here I
Will do, living in small village surrounded by the sea on one side and
by desert on the other on the south-eastern spanish coast its not that
easy to do - but will watch out for the prints next time I am at one in
London.
A.
On 18 Jul 2004, at 23:29, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Sunday, July 18, 2004,
Ah, but isn't the Galaxy doomed?
A.
On 18 Jul 2004, at 23:53, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Digital could be doomed..
Absolutely! I mean, the best they've been able to come up with so far
is the one on Hubble, and that can't resolve anything smaller than a
galaxy. Crap!
--
Cheers,
Bob
backwards fools, the rest of us are
moving
forward.*
-el gringo
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax is Dying?
And maybee pigs will fly.
A.
On 18 Jul 2004, at 19:39, El Gringo wrote:
Maybe
Unique? What about the Hasselblad H1 - isn't that a 645 that will take
both film and digital backs? Or the Mamiya 645? I guess if the rumored
new digital Pentax 645 is a dedicated digital body then that will be
kinda of unique, although not as flexible or indeed desirable as the
other systems
Yeah, so I here. Even at 20K a digital back still makes economical
sense to the serous pro who gets through lot of film. Apparently it
pays for itself in no time.
A.
On 17 Jul 2004, at 17:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, digital is apparently also making some inroads into
the
Jul 2004 at 14:34, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I dunno, I think film is doing fine considering. Sure a lot of people
will switch to digital for the convenience factor, but it is a bit
extreme to say film is dying (i.e. that it will eventually completely
disappear) - the results you get from film
a fully self contained
system.
Digital backs largely require external power sources, and the ones that
don't are huge and cumbersome. Yes the Pentax system will be quite
unique,
and very flexible in that it will allow MF field photography.
-el gringo
-Original Message-
From: Antonio
Not being inmate with the finances of Leica and Co. cant comment on
whether they could have afforded to produce their own digital backs -
sounds like they must really be in the financial doldrums if true.
Personally it is a solution I like (apart from the cable).
Lets hope that the 645 DSLR at
Has anyone noticed that when you read the list backwards it says that
Elvis is still alive and gives an adress in New York? Strange that,
worth checking out. Nice work Dario!.
AntOnio
On 18 Jul 2004, at 00:04, mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL
Well used LXs seem to go for about that all the time on ebay, not to
mention many many other film bodies. The real money of course is in the
lenses, like it always has been.
A.
On 16 Jul 2004, at 14:52, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/7/04, John Mustarde,
Or Pentax is about to bring out a whole new line of lenses and cameras
and is depleting current stock in the run up...
A.
On 16 Jul 2004, at 15:37, Tom Reese wrote:
Joseph Tainter checked his mailbox everyday for four months for lenses
that
never came then wrote:
I am frustrated beyond
You may be joking but I think it is only a matter of time (years)
before Cosina or someone else does just that. Certainly a digital
k-mount body would sell really well I think, particularly as Pentax
themselves seem intent on either ignoring their own manual focus
k-mount clients, or treating
Hi,
I have taken some pictures with it now and they seem fine. Incidentally
my SMCP 85/1.8 does not have the letterbox at the back and as we all
know, it takes fantastic pictures.
A.
On 14 Jul 2004, at 15:46, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 14 Jul 2004 at 15:02, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone
Microsoft is warning computer users to protect their PCs after critical
flaws were found in some versions of Windows, Internet Explorer and
Outlook Express.
It fears the security flaws could leave computers open to virus or worm
attack.
Microsoft identified seven holes in its monthly bulletin
Interesting payment options ...
On 15 Jul 2004, at 19:06, Mark Roberts wrote:
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice Camera!
$4,641,435.65 US seems pretty reasonable doesn't it?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItemcategory=30020item=3827794746
rd=1
Well the CF card comes pre-loaded
Well if you are carting that lot around with you your options are gonna
be pretty limited as you will nead a 4x4 to drive it all around! LOL.
My advice is to take just one camera, say the Yashica and get to know
it intimately wherever you go. Sure you may miss some of other kit, but
if you
Have you tried iView Media Pro?
Antonio
On 15 Jul 2004, at 19:40, Tim Sherburne wrote:
Sounds like you're on a Mac. Versiontracker.com lists many plug-ins for
iPhoto, including a few that may help with renaming files. A search for
iphoto rename turned up two possibilities.
t
On 7/15/04 4:34, Keith
Photoshop will rename a batch of files too for you I think.
A.
On 15 Jul 2004, at 22:19, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Have you tried iView Media Pro?
Antonio
On 15 Jul 2004, at 19:40, Tim Sherburne wrote:
Sounds like you're on a Mac. Versiontracker.com lists many plug-ins
for
iPhoto, including a few
[brain reaces end of thought process] or if you can be bothered I
am sure you could write a little applescript to do it for you.
Antonio.
On 15 Jul 2004, at 22:19, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Have you tried iView Media Pro?
Antonio
On 15 Jul 2004, at 19:40, Tim Sherburne wrote:
Sounds like
Perhaps the low feedback for this guy explains the current low bid
price?
ebay 3826873749
Im sure I saw one go for three times that money just a week or so ago.
Antonio
Hello,
Can anyone tell me how important the matt black metalic letterbox is on
k mount fixed lenght lenses, as one seems to have come unstuck on my
135/2.5 and was wondering if it was necessary at all to stick it back
on (not an easy job as I would have to somehow get it perfectly
horizontal
Hi,
Spanish Revolution?
Sure you dont mean Spanish Inquisition? or French Revolution perhaps?
Antonio
On 14 Jul 2004, at 15:36, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
For the most part discussion has been good. Most of the dissenting
and various opinions have been civil and that is good. I also
consider
Ahh, Goya. La Maja Desnuda - beautifull.
Antonio
On 14 Jul 2004, at 15:54, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I do mean Goya.
Collin
-
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: Re: apologetic
Hi,
Spanish Revolution?
Sure you dont mean Spanish Inquisition? or French Revolution
... after Christianity took it away from us in the first place,
remember? You seem to have conveniently forgotten the which hunts,
expulsions, torture and killings that were all conducted in the name of
chistendom and condoned by the Church.
Antonio
On 14 Jul 2004, at 18:21, Collin Brendemuehl
anyone else.
Antonio
On 14 Jul 2004, at 20:58, Bob Blakely wrote:
Yea, Antonio, I'm a Nazi. Go revel at the wondrous name you've tacked
onto
me. All the others on the list will be proud of you, send you many
accolades, etc. Naw, they'll just be silent.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL
Bob,
Not sure what I have lost. Nobody has galled the other bob a Nazi.
Antonio
On 14 Jul 2004, at 21:23, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Yea, Antonio, I'm a Nazi. Go revel at the wondrous name you've tacked
onto
me. All the others on the list will be proud of you, send you many
accolades, etc. Naw, they'll
will be proud of you, send you many
accolades, etc. Naw, they'll just be silent.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob,
The Protestant Church and the Third Reich
http://hist.academic.claremontmckenna.edu/jpetropoulos/church/
keithpage/protesta.htm
Antonio
On 14 Jul 2004
Glad your happy Don. But I dont think that the victims of religious
intolerance and the church's historical collusion in murder abuses are
particularly chuffed.
Antonio
On 14 Jul 2004, at 23:00, Don Sanderson wrote:
Thanks Bob,
That's the best laugh I've had all day!
Don
-Original
Well, I lost a large part of my family due to the Nazis and the Church.
I dont think it is very funny at all Tan. Obviously this Goodwin person
thinks he is really clever. Given the very frighning changes to US
foreign policy of late I think we all need to be very clear just where
pre-emptive
Sounds like you lost the argument to me and are not big enough to admit
it.
Exactly who classyfied your beleif system as being comprise of hate
and being Nazi exactly? I have seen none of this. You appear to be
purposely twisting the facts to make it appear that is the case. When
it is not.
Great post Robert!
A+
On 15 Jul 2004, at 00:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William, your comments are right on: Much of the Bible is, by todays
standards, hate literature, and should be dealt with in those terms.
As a gay American, I have personally experienced the no-stop hatred,
stupidity and
Stop the War, continue the discussion, love thy wife, forgive the weak,
never forget!
Antonio
On 15 Jul 2004, at 00:12, Jens Bladt wrote:
Stop the relion discussion - love thy neigbourgh - forgive sinners -
forget
the rest!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Amita,
Yeah, I heard about that too. Cant remember his name - I think it was
comented on here so check the archive. Do a search for LF. Aparetnly he
had to make his own camera a the normal LF stuff wasnt good enough for
him.
Antonio
On 15 Jul 2004, at 00:12, Amita Guha wrote:
I have an actual
Yuck, ugly camra the SFXn - I much prefer my Super A.
A.
On 12 Jul 2004, at 16:26, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Alan Chan wrote:
I recommend you look for a ME Super which has everything the ME has,
plus
manual exposure mode. Super A/Program and Program A/Plus are worth to
Man, porn at home is the best way to enjoy it.
Antonio
On 12 Jul 2004, at 20:36, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
My only goal is to keep porn out of my house.
I don't think you are missing anything.
Digital does not have the same exposure latitude as film, I think it is
slightly less than slide film - meaning you have to be more accurate
with your exposures. This is balanced by the easier workflow with
digital, whereby you can review a pic straight
Thanks. I stand corrected Rob.
A.
On 10 Jul 2004, at 17:16, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 10 Jul 2004 at 16:05, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Digital does not have the same exposure latitude as film, I think it
is
slightly less than slide film - meaning you have to be more accurate
with your exposures.
I
How about the Fujifilm FinePix S602Z Pro? Anything else seems overkill
for ebay.
Antonio
On 10 Jul 2004, at 22:25, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I should clarify my intent, yes it would be mostly for ebay usage
but I would also like to use for serious Macro work. That is one
case where the small sensor
Hey Rob, El Gringo wasn't attacking anyone, he was just making some
valid points about sharpness and the *istD and peoples perception of
it. A tripod may well help. What is the camera slap like on those
things?
Antonio Russell
Rob Brigham wrote:
Know Jostein his photography well, do you?
It
Begin forwarded message:
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8 July 2004 14:05:50 GMT+02:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: PDML Old timers/Old farts
Hey Brian,
I think we already covered Iraq, religion and politics! But then you
should know that seeing as you have been around so
Hey Brian,
I think we already covered Iraq, religion and politics! But then you
should know that seeing as you have been around so long. Personally I
would prefer you did unsubscribe, along with your pals, if all you can
do is hurl abuse.
A.
Re: OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure
Christian, from where I am sitting you have never been anything but
hostile to me. Sorry to break it too you but you like this but you are
still a zealot. The difference between my posts and the others is that
they are written by me, that is all. And you and a few other weirdos
have decided to
Hi Doug,
Well I have been using the internet since Telnet and IRC, some 20 years
ago and all I can say is that there is something wrong with this list.
Emails are clearly not getting through. I am not the only one to
experience this. Instead of berating me for raising the issue, or
blaming me
my systems.
A.
On 7 Jul 2004, at 16:30, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 7 Jul 2004 at 16:17, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Somone reported receiving a virus from the list last month. Given the
recent security scares with microsoft server software distributing
spyware and the like I think
Oh look, Jostein, Markus and friends discussing OT: MS products!
Hypocrites anyone?
On 8 Jul 2004, at 14:24, graywolf wrote:
I wonder if running the filter on the Inbox folder, then rerunning
the same filter on the Deleted Items folder would not automatically
and completely deep-six that mail?
any thought to the idea that
maybe
the problem is at your end?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: OT: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT:
Non-Microsoft
browsers are most secure
Praise the lord!
So, is anyone gonna let me in on what the rules are? I have asked
before but they seem to be some sort of secret or something as nothing
then materialized. From my experience so far with this group, the rules
seem to change depending on who is involved and how long you have
Well Rob, when you are debating a subject you normally have a different
opinion to some other folks, so I dont really see how integration
would be relevant.
As to empathy, tolerance and compromise, it is very hard to feel any of
those when you are the subject of an ongoing torrent of abuse and
We don't know what the cause is yet Norm. We are just raising the
subject for discussion. Calm down.
On 8 Jul 2004, at 17:34, Norm Baugher wrote:
Oh, sorry. is it Microsoft's fault?
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Norm, I dont think it is fair to blame Doug, its not his fault.
Yep, that must be it! Must try and stop that! LOL. vbg
A.
On 8 Jul 2004, at 17:57, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Hey Brian, send a copy of those rules over pal as I have no idea what
I
am supposed to have done wrong here.
well, for a start - breathing
Tom,
And there was me all sad because you said you didn't want to talk to me
again! LOL.
A.
On 8 Jul 2004, at 18:14, Tom C wrote:
Antonio, I have only one thing to say to you.
SHUTUP!
Tom C.
, Lewis Matthew wrote:
Perhaps they didn't raise an eyebrow because they were pleasantly
presented - a tactic which you have yet to master.
Lewis
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then what about all the OTHER OT NON PENTAX THREADS? Lets see, there
was the Tan is leaving thread (very
are conducted by people that have some thing
interesting to say, and do so in an intellegent and civilized manner,
without senseless and juvenile personal attacks on other participants.
Antonio Aparicio wrote:i
Then what about all the OTHER OT NON PENTAX THREADS? Lets see, there
was the Tan
Yes Bob, but the point is that the client machines are Windows machines!
Antonio
On 7 Jul 2004, at 01:03, Bob Blakely wrote:
Many viruses require MANY, MANY machines to accomplish their foul
mission.
For example, every server, Mac, Windows or Linux, is vulnerable to
denial
of service attacks.
http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp?
liArticleID=131776liArticleTypeID=1liCategoryID=1liChannelID=171liFl
avourID=1sSearch=nPage=1
The security issues in Internet Explorer have highlighted the need for
companies to think about supporting other web browsers on their
What I would like to know also is what software is used on the server
that maintains this list? Some have received viruses from the list,
whilst others have not had their messages appear, whilst others have
had their IDs faked
Antonio
On 7 Jul 2004, at 13:53, Antonio Aparicio wrote
to know is that it works, for the most part.
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/07/07 Wed AM 07:57:09 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Non-Microsoft browsers are most secure choice
What I would like to know also is what software is used on the server
that maintains
What if I change my sig to say, Pentax? LOL.
Regards,
Pentax
On 7 Jul 2004, at 15:14, William Robb wrote:
Mark, the word Antonio in the message body is one of the words that
will cause a message to hit my bit bucket.
Normally, I wouldn't have seen your reply, except that I glanced at
the ten or so
What are you talking about?
On 7 Jul 2004, at 15:31, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Mr. Aparicio:
I said nothing about you, positive or negative. You asked a question,
which I answered. I am amazed that somehow that offended you.
Antonio Aparicio wrote:i
talking about.
No one has ever received a virus from this list.
The server software is not your business or mine.
Regards,
Bob...
---
No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in
session.
-- Mark Twain
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What
You are always right about what?
Pentax
On 7 Jul 2004, at 15:45, Steve Larson wrote:
How about I'm always right instead.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Pentax
My pleasure. By the way, unless you hadnt notices, photography is now
digital, uses the internet and the, computer, browser and software you
use in directly related to photograpy in the modern age. And it is
also directly related to this group, which if you hadnnt noticed is
taking place on
Bye. Have a nice vacation.
Antonio
On 7 Jul 2004, at 16:19, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Time for me to move on. Have a long vacation coming up in a few days
and I
probably won't return to the list for quite some time. Frankly, I
don't
feel much a part of things here ... so, thanks to all who've been
Now you are just being sarcastic.
On 7 Jul 2004, at 16:21, Rob Brigham wrote:
You mean you are still using it? I scrapped IE and Windows a couple of
weeks back when he first showed us the error of our ways - thanks
Antonio, I had never realised how bad this stuff was before! Why is
this
For those on the list who beleive windows is safe:
Hackers sent a chill across the Web last week when they engineered a
way to take over Microsoft-designed Web servers [IIS] to spread a virus
onto Windows PCs. The virus was planted on Windows computers when they
visited Web sites that had been
No idea.
Antonio
On 6 Jul 2004, at 11:21, Jens Bladt wrote:
Thankas for the info.
What is ISS?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juli 2004 11:17
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: OT
about 20 hours later.
Which
means that all *legal* copies of Microsoft Windows operating systems
could be
patched within a week after that, depending on the update frequency.
Companies not updating their platforms can of course be caught pants
down any
day.
Quoting Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
