On Mar 26, 2006, at 7:05 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
A little more curve-tweaking and you'll
clearly see the fringing and posterizing.
Maybe you just have to pretend you're shooting slides and not try to
save the thing in post.
-Aaron
On Mar 26, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I like to control the entire process.
Me too. Which is why it stinks that I find the process so godawful
boring.
-Aaron
Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you just have to pretend you're shooting slides and not try to
save the thing in post.
Won't help. I have to use colour negative film, exactly because of the
limited dynamic range of slide film.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG -
At 07:56 AM 3/26/2006, you wrote:
Ralf,
I'm in general agreement.
For those who enjoy and want the best out of film large format is a
relatively inexpensive venture.
(That is, compared to what I've seen in some 35 outfits.)
4x5 -- a. $150 for a good press camera to start with (Busch
I don't find either process terribly boring -- darkroom or digital. But
I don't process other people's work, only my own. That is much more
rewarding than operating a lab. I tried doing custom BW printing at one
time many years ago. I got plenty of business in a hurry, but soon
learned that I
On Mar 26, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But I don't process other people's work, only my own. That is much
more rewarding than operating a lab. I tried doing custom BW printing
at one time many years ago. I got plenty of business in a hurry, but
soon learned that I didn't enjoy
- Original Message -
From: Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those who enjoy and want the best out of film large format is a
relatively inexpensive venture.
Cheap to own, expensive to use... ;-)
Jostein
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cheap to own, expensive to use... ;-)
Not necessarily. You simply can't fire away at 4.3 fps wwith a 4 by 5.
:-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries -
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 23:56
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: SV: Tripod Dilemma
On 18/1/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
A Bonbo Trecker
That's the French candy version
I thought it was for small digital
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/18 Wed PM 10:42:54 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: SV: Tripod Dilemma
A Bonbo Trecker is carbon fibre - very light and versatile - and apr. 500
USD. But, man is that nice!
I'll probably never get one of those :-/
Jens Bladt
mike wilson wrote:
You can have mine for 300 - although I have to warn you that
it seems to be made out of steel. 8-)
The application of a power drill here and there would create a multitude of
holes and reduce weight. The Swiss Cheese tripod for the Swiss Tony
photographer. Drilling holes in
From: Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/19 Thu AM 10:38:46 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: SV: Tripod Dilemma
mike wilson wrote:
You can have mine for 300 - although I have to warn you that
it seems to be made out of steel. 8-)
The application
Sunny Chung wrote:
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many people :-0
I guess the word came to mind because I was partially baffled at the
ridiculous
prices I was seeing for these tripods (ex: $200 - $500) I guess if
I had a full time
job, that would be
I recommend looking at the Slik 300DX instead of the Bogen 3001.
We have both in our household. The Slik gets a little taller, is
cheaper, feels sturdier and comes with a nice pan/tilt head. What I
like about the most, though, is the legs occupy a lot more area; it is
far less tippy than the
If i stay with the tripod i have now, its not here but i think it is the
Manfotto 28, big
double aluminum tube
legs thing, is there a recommended head for macro. I don't think this tripod
closes down
much below
24-26 but i would need to get closer obvisously.
Is there a head with a slide
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tripod Dilemma
Any head reccomendations or would one be better of buy a second pod
specifically for
macro.
If it's the tripod you loaned me at GFM, it's an 028 with some sort of
little boy head on it.
I did appreciate
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 10:39
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: SV: Tripod Dilemma
mike wilson wrote:
You can have mine for 300 - although I have to warn you
that it seems
to be made out of steel. 8
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:07:51 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 10:39
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: SV: Tripod Dilemma
mike wilson wrote:
You can have mine for 300 - although I have
suited.
I have the 486RC2 ball head on my mono pod.
That should be sturdy enough then to handle rails.?
Dave
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tripod Dilemma
Any head reccomendations or would one be better of buy
John Forbes wrote:
The application of a power drill here and there would create a
multitude of holes and reduce weight. The Swiss Cheese
tripod for the
Swiss Tony photographer. Drilling holes in a tripod is like...
...first you make sure her legs are well spread and
securely
John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:07:51 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 10:39
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: SV: Tripod Dilemma
mike wilson wrote:
You can have mine
The application of a power drill here and there would create a
multitude of holes and reduce weight. The Swiss Cheese tripod for
the Swiss Tony photographer. Drilling holes in a tripod is like...
...first you make sure her legs are well spread and securely
fastened. Then you
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tripod Dilemma
I have the 486RC2 ball head on my mono pod.
That should be sturdy enough then to handle rails.?
That should support a rail quite nicely.
William Robb
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A good one, appropriately chosen, can last a lifetime, and can
be used with long, heavy lenses, medium format as well as
35mm. The worst investment I ever made was an inexpensive
tripod.
Yes, been there. Very poor investment a cheap tripod, and one I won't
repeat.
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many people :-0
I guess the word came to mind because I was partially baffled at the ridiculous
prices I was seeing for these tripods (ex: $200 - $500) I guess if
I had a full time
job, that would be a reasonable price but
From: Sunny Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/18 Wed AM 09:52:24 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Tripod Dilemma
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many people :-0
I don't think people were offended as much as concerned that you didn't
Check out ebay. I bought both of my tripods used for less than half the
cost of a new one, and they're both quite excellent.
Paul
On Jan 18, 2006, at 4:52 AM, Sunny Chung wrote:
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many people :-0
I guess the word came to mind
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many people :-0
I guess the word came to mind because I was partially baffled at the
ridiculous
prices I was seeing for these tripods (ex: $200 - $500) I guess if
I had a full time
job, that would be a reasonable
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, mike wilson wrote:
_Everyone_ has a tight budget, they are just different. Find the one you want
and then look for the best price you can. Unlike some other photographic
equipment, tripods can often be found in (functionally) as good as new
condition.
I second that;
The newer Promaster tripods are really worth a look. Construction is
decent.
They're less expensive and lighter than Bogen/Manfrotto stuff.
And for some of them the center post is also a monopod.
And, if you're out walking a lot at night, consider investing in a high-$$$
light-weight tripod.
Rob Studdert wrote:
What you have to consider is that if you make the right choice in choosing your
silly tripod it will likely outlast all your other photo gear. It's worth
thinking about and spending money on, the cheap ones generally don't do the
intended job very well and will fall apart
From: Krisjanis Linkevics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/18 Wed PM 12:15:35 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Tripod Dilemma
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many people :-0
I guess the word came to mind because I was partially baffled
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're less expensive and lighter than Bogen/Manfrotto stuff.
I am not an authority, but I think that lightness is a drawback for a
tripod: it is just not steady enough.
Kostas
Kostas Kavoussanakis
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 05:20:29 -0800
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're less expensive and lighter than Bogen/Manfrotto stuff.
I am not an authority, but I think that lightness is a drawback for a
tripod:
it is just not steady enough.
Kostas
Generally
A tripod that stays at home or in the trunk of the car
because it's too heavy to carry comfortably is worse
than no tripod at all: The money is spent, but there
is no benefit.
For years I used a very sturdy, 3.5kg Slik tripod, but
usually left it behind! A few years ago I got a
Velbon Maxi
Rick Womer wrote:
A tripod that stays at home or in the trunk of the car
because it's too heavy to carry comfortably is worse than no
tripod at all: The money is spent, but there is no benefit.
A heavy tripod is just natures way of telling you to get fitter.
Malcolm
Subject: RE: Tripod Dilemma
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many people :-0
I guess the word came to mind because I was partially baffled at the
ridiculous
prices I was seeing for these tripods (ex: $200 - $500) I guess if
I had a full time
job
My experience with Promaster gear has been mixed. I'd suggest looking very
carefully at any product carrying that name.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote re: Promaster tripods:
They're less expensive and lighter than Bogen/Manfrotto stuff.
I
Look for a photo swap-meet. Not knowing what size lenses/bodies you
plan use on it, can only suggest you look for something fits your
definition of substantial.
My primary tripod is a Bogen 3021 with their Pro ball head. Also, own a
light weight 3001 with a mini-ball head for those times when much
the Velbon.
HTH
Don
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:37 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Tripod Dilemma
I don't think anyone was offended. Certainly not me.
If you can't afford a new tripod, but a good
What do you think about the 190DB+141RC combo? I'm also looking for a
tripod, but I'm not sure if I should go with this combo or spend a
little (my budget is very tight right now) more for the Pro version.
I would like to experiment with macro, maybe being able to mount the
center column
On Jan 18, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Bogen 3001, Light but very sturdy, one of the least expensive
full height tripods.
Bogen 3021 BPRO, Heavier, sturdier, center column can be
mounted horizontally (Very handy), a bit more expensive.
Those were the two tripods that came to mind
I don't know why you should complain about 3.5 kg.
The Manfrotto 75 I use weighs 5.3kg and I carry it
around the forest all the time. Of course I
usually have a backache that last a week
afterwards. But what a difference it makes with
the 400mm Sigma APO. I haven't used this lens on
the *ist
and pretty solid.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:27 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Tripod Dilemma
What do you think about the 190DB+141RC combo? I'm also looking for a
tripod, but I'm
I was in the same situation not too long ago. I had an older tripod that
I purchased when I was in college, a heavy Sears jobbie. The legs
worked ok, and it was sturdy, but it was mainly the head that drove me
crazy. With a heavyish lens, it would droop a little once you locked it
and let
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
What do you think about the 190DB+141RC combo? I'm also looking for a
tripod, but I'm not sure if I should go with this combo or spend a
little (my budget is very tight right now) more for the Pro version.
I would like to experiment with macro, maybe being able to
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Tripod Dilemma
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:59:51 -
cheap tripods are a false economy. The best way to buy a tripod is to take
your equipment into a shop that has a large range, and try them out. It's
particularly
In that case a $12 tripod works wonders! :-)
Tom C.
From: Sunny Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Tripod Dilemma
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:52:24 -0500
I'm sorry for using the word silly and unintentionally offending
many
PROTECTED]
Sendt: 18. januar 2006 06:31
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Tripod Dilemma
I know its hard to believe with all the night shots I have in my
gallery, but I still do not
own a tripod. Now that I'm looking for one, I'm extremely stumped.
Should I buy a generic
$12 tripod, or invest
I have borrowed a friend's manfretto tripod with a 322RC2 head once,
and I did not like how the grip obstructed you from tilting the camera
too far back. So if you were shooting up at something, you had to
have the camera mounted a certain way, with the grip to the side or in
the front. Is this
Taken with the setup I described, Bogen 3xxx + 322RC2 head, pointed up.
http://www.g0nz.com/4imgs/data/media/3/IMGP6113.jpg
It is hard to point higher up than this, but do you need that? If you
often do, then a 3 way head might be better.
Sunny Chung wrote:
I have borrowed a friend's
-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Tripod Dilemma
I have borrowed a friend's manfretto tripod with a 322RC2 head once,
and I did not like how the grip obstructed you from tilting the camera
too far back. So if you were shooting up at something, you had to
have the camera mounted a certain way
On Jan 18, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Sunny Chung wrote:
I have borrowed a friend's manfretto tripod with a 322RC2 head once,
and I did not like how the grip obstructed you from tilting the camera
too far back. So if you were shooting up at something, you had to
have the camera mounted a certain way,
I haven't read all the posts on this thread so I don't know if
this has been mentioned. No doubt you've gotten a lot of tripod
recommendations (if the list isn't being silly today).
I recall someone once writing -- and this has been my experience
-- that people tend to own either no tripods
Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 14:37
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Tripod Dilemma
I don't think anyone was offended. Certainly not me.
If you can't afford a new tripod, but a good used one. As
Bob Walkden suggested, look
On 18/1/06, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
A heavy tripod is just natures way of telling you to get fitter.
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/1/06, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
A heavy tripod is just natures way of telling you to get fitter.
Mark!
I thought a heavy tripod was nature's way of telling you to work
overtime so you can afford carbon fiber!
--
Mark Roberts
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
What do you think about the 190DB+141RC combo? I'm also looking for a
tripod, but I'm not sure if I should go with this combo or spend a
little (my budget is very tight right now) more for the Pro version.
I would like to experiment with macro, maybe being able to
On 18/1/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought a heavy tripod was nature's way of telling you to work
overtime so you can afford carbon fiber!
LOL
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 18/1/06, Carlos Royo, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have got the 190B, 141 RC 3-D head and 486 RC2 ballhead. Unless you
have a reason to prioritize the purchase of the 141 RC, go for a
ballhead. It is lighter, more compact and faster to use. Since I got the
ballhead, I don't use the 141 RC
On 18 Jan 2006 at 8:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spending $200 to $500 on a quality, solid, carbon fibre unit for a hiker
shooting
medium-lenth or wide angle lenses on 135 or medium may be suitable.
For 4x5 8x10, when there's any wind at all, the big video unit comes out.
The beauty of
On 18 Jan 2006 at 12:49, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I recall someone once writing -- and this has been my experience
-- that people tend to own either no tripods or several. One
can't do all jobs. I currently have four tripods and two monopods.
LOL, yes, I have four tripods, one monopod, five
Emne: Re: Tripod Dilemma
On 18/1/06, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
A heavy tripod is just natures way of telling you to get fitter.
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Carlos Royo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 18. januar 2006 22:50
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Tripod Dilemma
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
What do you think about the 190DB+141RC combo? I'm also looking for a
tripod, but I'm not sure if I
On 18 Jan 2006 at 23:42, Jens Bladt wrote:
A Bonbo Trecker is carbon fibre - very light and versatile - and apr. 500
USD. But, man is that nice!
I'll probably never get one of those :-/
I believe that all the Benbo range use tubular aluminium construction, the
Trekker is quite light but not
On 18/1/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
A Bonbo Trecker
That's the French candy version
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
A heavy tripod is just natures way of telling you to get fitter.
Or get a sherpa!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: Tripod Dilemma
Rick Womer wrote
In a message dated 1/18/2006 6:07:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For years I used a very sturdy, 3.5kg Slik tripod, but
usually left it behind! A few years ago I got a
Velbon Maxi 343E, and I carry it often. Not as sturdy
and stable as the Slik, for sure, but with the
I know its hard to believe with all the night shots I have in my
gallery, but I still do not
own a tripod. Now that I'm looking for one, I'm extremely stumped.
Should I buy a generic
$12 tripod, or invest in a name brand like bogen/manfrotto. I don't
want to spend over $100
on a silly tripod,
On 18 Jan 2006 at 0:30, Sunny Chung wrote:
I know its hard to believe with all the night shots I have in my
gallery, but I still do not
own a tripod. Now that I'm looking for one, I'm extremely stumped.
Should I buy a generic
$12 tripod, or invest in a name brand like bogen/manfrotto. I
with the mechanics
of the thing.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Sunny Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 05:31
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Tripod Dilemma
I know its hard to believe with all the night shots I have in
my gallery, but I still do not own
Tripods aren't silly. That you choose to call them silly indicates that
you don't appreciate how valuable they can be. They are valuable tools for
almost every photographer. A good one, appropriately chosen, can last a
lifetime, and can be used with long, heavy lenses, medium format as well as
On 2 Nov 2005 at 18:37, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 1 Nov 2005 at 14:42, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Am I obligated not to show anyone the other pics? What about the one she
saw
and didn't want me to show?
Forget that you ever pressed the shutter when she was in front of the camera,
leave her
Shel, it sounds to me like you think they are good -- she thinks they are
bad. And that you think if you show them to others they will think they are
good. Ergo, she will change her mind and then think they are good too.
But I wouldn't count on it.
For instance, personally, I rarely like
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:18 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A Small Dilemma
If she explicitly said not to post her photo, take that as generic
regarding all photos of her.
Unless
Hi!
At least this is what I would do... I too have some very nice pictures
(to my eye at least) that I cannot show anyone *sigh*.
Boris you kinky bugger ;-)))
ROTFLMAO...
Nothing really kinky, Cotty... Not in a sense you might have thought
about it anyway ;-).
--
Boris
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 03:01:45 -, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tom C wrote:
From: David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about a little more relaxed attitude toward sharing the picture.
I'll take a shot of my wife, and she'll say, Oh, I hate that one,
don't show anyone. I
On 11/1/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras to photograph
one another. I got a few nice shots of her, and showed her one, which she
didn't like. She
On 11/1/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you show that one pic at this point, she could probably successfully sue
you. snip
sue for what? she knew the photo was being taken and didn't object to
that, she only objected to shel showing it, afaik. assuming shel will
not be showing
Show me the pics and I´ll give you my answer ;-)
All the best!
Raimo K
personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho/
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: A Small Dilemma
On 11/1/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you show that one pic at this point, she could probably successfully
sue
you. snip
sue for what? she knew the photo was being taken and didn't object
On 11/2/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A person can launch a lawsuit for pretty much any reason, if they desire.
true. implicit in my question was that the lawsuit not be frivolous
or vexatious.
If she finds the final picture to be defaming, and has given specific
instructions to
frank theriault wrote:
--SNIP--
with the greatest of respect: wrong! defamation is the publication
or utterance of an untruth about someone. truth is a complete defense
to the charge. assuming that shel hasn't manipulated the photos, he
can't be sued for defamation.
--SNIP--
-frank
How did George Galloway prove that defamation isn't the publication of an
untruth about someone?
John
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 14:56:23 -, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
--SNIP--
with the greatest of respect: wrong! defamation is the publication
or utterance of
On 2/11/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
At least this is what I would do... I too have some very nice pictures
(to my eye at least) that I cannot show anyone *sigh*.
Boris you kinky bugger ;-)))
ROTFLMAO...
Nothing really kinky, Cotty... Not in a sense you might have thought
In some jurisdictions judges like to make the law. A good judge who
knew and respected the law would throw a baseless lawsuit out, but with
some you can't be sure they even know the law it's not required
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/2/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A person
On 11/2/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In some jurisdictions judges like to make the law. A good judge who
knew and respected the law would throw a baseless lawsuit out, but with
some you can't be sure they even know the law it's not required
a plaintiff must make out a prima
In some jurisdictions judges like to make the law.
I don't think this is limited by jurisdictions.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Small Dilemma
A good judge who
knew and respected the law would throw a baseless lawsuit out
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras to photograph
one another. I got a few nice shots of her, and showed her one, which she
didn't like. She specifically asked - in fact told me on no uncertain
terms -
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras to photograph
one another. I got a few nice shots of her, and showed her one, which she
didn't like. She specifically asked - in fact told me
Hello Shel,
Part of the obligation depends on the relationship. If you wish to
maintain the relationship, then you should probably comply with her
requests. When I am confronted with a situation like that, I do try
to probe as to what the objection is. Sometimes we can take a few
shots to
On 1/11/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras to photograph
one another. I got a few nice shots of her, and showed her one, which she
didn't like. She
Show us the picture(s) so we can make a determination of your obligations.
;)
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras to photograph
one another. I got a few nice shots of her,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:42:13PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras to photograph
one another. I got a few nice shots of her, and showed her one, which she
didn't like.
On 11/1/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras to photograph
one another. I got a few nice shots of her, and showed her one, which she
didn't like. She
If this acquaintance is a friend, I would want to retain the friendship
and not publish any of the pictures. How about showing the ones she took
of you?
Jim A.
Not long ago an acquaintance came to visit. We were talking about
photography and cameras, and ended up using one of my cameras
Why are you surprised, John? I'm a curious fellow and would like to hear
what others think or may do in such a situation. The question was prompted
by comments made in another thread, and it's been on my mind for a while to
get a sense of how others see this situation.
Shel
You meet the nicest
Interspersed
[Original Message]
From: skye
Am I obligated not to show anyone the other pics? What about the one
she
saw and didn't want me to show?
Pardon me for saying so, but it kind of sounds like you're asking for
an excuse to do the opposite of what your acquaintance wants you
Depends on what?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Cotty
Am I obligated not to show anyone the other pics? What about the one she
saw and didn't want me to show?
Har, this is straight out of a 'Scruples' box.
Depends.
They hoovered ... not a one was in focus ... which surprised me considering
that she's a photographer of some skill. Maybe her heart wasn't in it ...
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about showing the ones she took
of you?
301 - 400 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
