-goodbye-oxford-tavern
I went to the opening tonight. Terrific show.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/14/02/goodbyeoxford/index.html
The edit is a bit sloppy on my part, but I'm not apologising. I had fun
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML P
-set-to-lose-sleaze-factor-20130720-2qb0d.html
>
> My friend was trying to photograph the story of the pub long before the pub
> was even for sale. She only got permission in the last 48 hours before it
> closed.
>
> http://au.blurb.com/b/5115919-goodbye-oxford-tavern
>
> I went t
to photograph the story of the pub long before the pub was even for sale. She only got permission in the last 48 hours before it
closed.
http://au.blurb.com/b/5115919-goodbye-oxford-tavern
I went to the opening tonight. Terrific show.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/14/02/goodbyeoxford
ph the story of the pub long before the pub
> was even for sale. She only got permission in the last 48 hours before it
> closed.
>
> http://au.blurb.com/b/5115919-goodbye-oxford-tavern
>
> I went to the opening tonight. Terrific show.
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/1
/poles-apart-topless-bar-set-to-lose-sleaze-factor-20130720-2qb0d.html
My friend was trying to photograph the story of the pub long before
the pub was even for sale. She only got permission in the last 48
hours before it closed.
http://au.blurb.com/b/5115919-goodbye-oxford-tavern
I went to the
of the pub long before the
pub was even for sale. She only got permission in the last 48 hours
before it closed.
http://au.blurb.com/b/5115919-goodbye-oxford-tavern
I went to the opening tonight. Terrific show.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/14/02/goodbyeoxford/index.html
The edit is a
The infamous FA 28-70mm f4.0 had a composite aspheric element made up of
a glass component with an optically matched molded plastic. It was the
break down of this element that supposedly rendered a number of those
lenses into, (very lightweight), paperweights.
On 1/6/2014 10:11 AM, Bruce Walk
Hi Bruce & Boris Sirs, New Year Greetings. Pentax does not use
optical plastic elements in their K- mount lenses including the 18-55
kit
lens or the cheaper primes.
Yes they do use plastic in the Aspheric lens elements. This plastic is
deposited over the glass lens in ridges. Hence aspherical elem
Boris, it's possibly no coincidence that the Pentax kit lenses are
actually very good optically (esp. the 18-55) where the Canikon ones
are apparently just disposable.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Thanks for heads up, Bipin, but I have a question. It seems rather stra
Thanks for that, Bipin.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> Hello Bruce Sir, some aspheric lens elements are made by depositing
> optical plastic on the glass.
> Unlike a spherical lens element which is perfectly smooth and
> roundish, asperical lenses will have a number
> of jag
Thanks for heads up, Bipin, but I have a question. It seems rather
strange to me that even the cheaper kit lenses that boast to have
aspherical elements would not use plastic in the composition. I wouldn't
presume that 18-55/3.5-5.6 AL was made all of pure glass...
Anything I miss here?
On 1/
Thanks for adding some facts to the debate Bipin, and welcome back!
I've been wondering where you disappeared to. Hope all is well.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> Hello Bruce Sir, some aspheric lens elements are made by depositing
> optical plastic on the glass.
> Unlike a s
Hello Bruce Sir, some aspheric lens elements are made by depositing
optical plastic on the glass.
Unlike a spherical lens element which is perfectly smooth and
roundish, asperical lenses will have a number
of jagged edges forming the lens curvature.
Also Dupleix lenses (two lenses glued together) n
I don't know about any k-mount lenses, but plastic is used for lenses in
some critical applications were high precision and light weight are both
desirable.
On 1/6/2014 10:11 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
That's a good question, Boris. Not being a gearhead I don't closely
study the fine details of l
My recollection is that virtually all modern wide-to-normal camera lenses
contain aspherical elements, and that most of those are hybrid--a glass
spherical lens with a plastic element cemented on to give it a complex aspheric
shape.
The most notorious of these in Pentax land is the FA 28-70/4,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> That's a good question, Boris. Not being a gearhead I don't closely
> study the fine details of lens construction, but I assumed that only
> glass was hard and stable enough to be ground or milled into shape
> with the required tolerances.
>
That's a good question, Boris. Not being a gearhead I don't closely
study the fine details of lens construction, but I assumed that only
glass was hard and stable enough to be ground or milled into shape
with the required tolerances.
Does anyone know if plastic, or anything besides glass and coati
The RX100II is Wifi enabled and has a companion app for smart phones :)
On 6 January 2014 16:16, Boris Liberman wrote:
> That's right. Especially that nowadays being connected (aka being able to
> upload your next selfie to facebook or whatever) matters more than being
> photographically endowed
That's right. Especially that nowadays being connected (aka being able
to upload your next selfie to facebook or whatever) matters more than
being photographically endowed, so to speak.
On 1/5/2014 12:57 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
My Sony RX100II is truly pocket-able and has an integrated 28/1.8
On 1/5/2014 12:07 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
The Nokton's far too big for someone to just carry around. You can't
stick that in your pocket. The Pentax barely fits (once you add the
required camera), and it's not full-frame.
Again, only people who care about DOF, macro, or large prints want
anythi
Point taken. However I don't believe that all modern Pentax lenses are
devoid of optical plastic. Nor do I think that all the lenses that
Pentax marks as having aspherics is made by crafty glass processing
techniques, especially the inexpensive ones...
On 1/4/2014 9:46 PM, Bruce Walker wrote
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Bill wrote:
>
>
> Most people don't care enough about photography to spend the money on a 77mm
> LTD anyway.
And that why i have one
Dave
>
> bill
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNS
My Sony RX100II is truly pocket-able and has an integrated 28/1.8
equivalent lens, the Panasonic is very small but you still need to add
a lens but in both cases neither are even close to replacing an SLR
for so many types of photography that I do. I use the camera in my
Android phone exensively to
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 1/4/2014 9:22 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Boris Liberman wrote:
>>>
>>>My point is that miniaturization is reaching yet another level. And
>>>this camera unlike iPhone's and plethora of Android devices is
>>>seriously real deal.
>>
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Bruce Walker wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Boris Liberman wrote:
>>>
>>> My point is that miniaturization is reaching yet another level. And
>>> this camera unlike iPhone's and plethora of Android devices is
>>> seriously
Excellent! Let me know when your balsa wood jetliner is ready for its
maiden voyage and I shall be there with my K-3 to document it.
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Bruce, let me suggest to you ever so humbly that the precision of execution
> has nothing to with material
Bruce, let me suggest to you ever so humbly that the precision of
execution has nothing to with material used...
On 1/4/2014 9:30 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Boris Liberman wrote:
My point is that miniaturization is reachi
Aahz, I have to very respectfully disagree. Have a look on Voigtlander
Nokton 40/1.4. Given its speed, it is positively very small. And to boot
it naturally covers the so called full frame. The Pentax 40/2.8 pancake
is also very small.
So you can have small (not iPhone small though) lenses and
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Boris Liberman wrote:
>>
>> My point is that miniaturization is reaching yet another level. And
>> this camera unlike iPhone's and plethora of Android devices is
>> seriously real deal.
>
> Yes and no -- real glass requires
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> My point is that miniaturization is reaching yet another level. And
> this camera unlike iPhone's and plethora of Android devices is
> seriously real deal.
Yes and no -- real glass requires real weight and bulk. I agree that
most people (who don't c
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
Darren, have you held in your hands Panasonic GM1 and the pancake
kit zoom lens?
Yeah, I have (renting one right now from lensrentals.com along with a
buttload of other bodies and lenses to test out the m43 line), not sure
what
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 1/2/2014 6:27 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>>http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
>
> Darren, have you held in your hands Panasonic GM1 and the pancake
> kit zoom lens?
Yeah, I have (re
On 1/2/2014 6:27 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
Darren, have you held in your hands Panasonic GM1 and the pancake kit
zoom lens?
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
On 02/01/2014 3:36 PM, Walt wrote:
On 1/2/2014 3:12 PM, Bill wrote:
On 02/01/2014 2:23 PM, Walt wrote:
What gets me about this story, and the many others in the same vein, is
that they all seem to completely ignore the importance of optics in
photography.
It's only important to certain snobby
On 1/2/2014 3:12 PM, Bill wrote:
On 02/01/2014 2:23 PM, Walt wrote:
What gets me about this story, and the many others in the same vein, is
that they all seem to completely ignore the importance of optics in
photography.
It's only important to certain snobby types who have an inflated ego
and
On 1/2/2014 11:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
Alright, I managed to post my first thought when I tried to delete and
start over. This is the same reasoning that proclaims the end of the PC
(Mac or Microsoft doesn&#
On 02/01/2014 2:23 PM, Walt wrote:
What gets me about this story, and the many others in the same vein, is
that they all seem to completely ignore the importance of optics in
photography.
It's only important to certain snobby types who have an inflated ego and
derive their self worth from how
otography enough to spend money on a
> 77/1.8 Ltd. suddenly saying to themselves, "You know what? Screw that. I'm
> getting an iPhone. That'll be good enough."
>
> -- Walt
>
>
>> On 1/2/2014 10:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> http://www.newyorker.
know what? Screw
that. I'm getting an iPhone. That'll be good enough."
-- Walt
On 1/2/2014 10:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
I think he is confusing things. What defines a "camera" looks like a
problem.
It seems that we view a real camera as one with image controls, any of
tilt/shift/aperture/shutter speed.
So, did the real camera, the view camera as we know it, disappear when Kodak
introduced the Brownie as the point-
an 2, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
>
>
> --
> I don't have a problem with idiots.
> I have a problem with the fact that they have an internet connection.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discus
eljmatyola
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't have a problem with idiots.
>> I have a problem with the fact that they
t; On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't have a problem with idiots.
>> I have a problem with the fact that they have an internet connect
The 20% decline in sales of mirror-less cameras has all the
manufacturer's attention.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
>
>
> --
> I don't have a problem with idiots.
> I
/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
>
>
> --
> I don't have a problem with idiots.
> I have a problem with the fact that they have an internet connection.
>
> --
&g
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/12/goodbye-cameras.html
--
I don't have a problem with idiots.
I have a problem with the fact that they have an internet connection.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBS
On 11-10-16 2:21 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-10-15 5:06 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
The original design of Unix contains so many
ideas that were radical, far from obvious, and turned out to be right,
and more or less zero ideas that turned out to be
On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> On 11-10-15 5:06 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
>> The original design of Unix contains so many
>> ideas that were radical, far from obvious, and turned out to be right,
>> and more or less zero ideas that turned out to be wrong;
>
> creat(2) should have
Thanks for heads up, Larry. On a whim, I bought myself a new Kindle,
that little $79 one. I spent much of the day reading on it (we have a
bit of a mid semester break now) and, of course, it's based on Linux.
I wonder how long it will take our technology to lose its connection
to Ritchie's work.
On 11-10-15 5:06 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
The original design of Unix contains so many
ideas that were radical, far from obvious, and turned out to be right,
and more or less zero ideas that turned out to be wrong;
creat(2) should have been spelled with an 'e'.
:-)
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Perhaps it's because I'm an old geek and can remember when V7 Unix was
new and exciting, but in my mind Ritchie and Thompson loom larger than
any of those other guys. The original design of Unix contains so many
ideas that were radical, far from obvious, and turned out to be right,
and more or les
On 10/14/2011 10:15, Larry Colen wrote:
Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening
post on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
This news will almost certainly cause one of two reactions:
"Who?"
or
Dismay that we have lost someone who has arguably
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:03:06AM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
> The term "Microsoft garbage" is redundant.
>
> Darren Addy
Not in the terms of C/C++ programming it isn't.
The Visual C products have long been serious contenders for
the title of "best C development and debugging environment".
--
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:23:24PM +1300, David Mann wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> > Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening
> > post on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
> >
> > This news will almost certainly
The term "Microsoft garbage" is redundant.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:15:32 -0700
From: Larry Colen
>
>
>Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening
>post on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
>
>
>This news will almost certainly cause one of two reactions:
>"Who?"
>or
>Dismay that we have
Wired is on it:
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2011/10/thedennisritchieeffect/
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the dire
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening post
> on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
>
> This news will almost certainly cause one of two reactions:
> "Who?"
> or
> Dismay that we have lost so
Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening
post on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
This news will almost certainly cause one of two reactions:
"Who?"
or
Dismay that we have lost someone who has arguably contributed more to
the world of compu
I set the mode dial to V; I thought it meant "Virtuoso" - does it not???
2010/6/19 Bob Sullivan :
> Ecke,
> You using Velvia again?
> Regards, Bob S.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:21 AM, eckinator wrote:
>> Fortunatey I am not a weekend dad but I was having a gloomy day a
>> while ago and trie
Ecke,
You using Velvia again?
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:21 AM, eckinator wrote:
> Fortunatey I am not a weekend dad but I was having a gloomy day a
> while ago and tried to capture one as I see it around me much too
> often. Plasticky playground with a dash of bitterness. Please
Fortunatey I am not a weekend dad but I was having a gloomy day a
while ago and tried to capture one as I see it around me much too
often. Plasticky playground with a dash of bitterness. Please let me
know if this works for you. b/w version added for comparison. I am not
quite happy with both but h
In a message dated 11/22/2008 5:11:25 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2008&s=0&category=landscape&blog=20081122150043
^^^ Goodbye autumn colors. First snow has come with cold and stormy
nights. Fall had to retreat, lea
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2008&s=0&category=landscape&blog=20081122150043
^^^ Goodbye autumn colors. First snow has come with cold and stormy
nights. Fall had to retreat, leaving all her merchandise, apples and
bitter-sweet rowan berries.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
- Original Message -
From: "Roman"
Subject: Crossing the river (goodbye *istDL)
> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070807225946
>
> I'd accidentially damaged f-screen of my *istDL and going to purchase
> K100D Super, then repair and sell old DL body. These
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070807225946
I'd accidentially damaged f-screen of my *istDL and going to purchase
K100D Super, then repair and sell old DL body. These are the last photos
with *istDL for over a year of owning one. I like this little SLR with
noisy mirror bouncing inside but I'
In a message dated 3/10/2007 12:27:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070130154732
^^^ Had enough of the snow and cold already, now happy to say goodbye
winter, as days are warm and snow is gone by now. In memory of those
sunny cold
I quite like this one, but it's a little over saturated IMO.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/11/07, Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070130154732
> ^^^ Had enough of the snow and cold already, now happy to say goodbye
> winter, as days are warm and sno
Subject: Re: Goodbye winter
On 10/3/07, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070130154732
>^^^ Had enough of the snow and cold already, now happy to say goodbye
>winter, as days are warm and snow is gone by now. In memory of those
>sunny cold days.
Nice
On 10/3/07, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070130154732
>^^^ Had enough of the snow and cold already, now happy to say goodbye
>winter, as days are warm and snow is gone by now. In memory of those
>sunny cold days.
Nice but I prefer the you
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070130154732
^^^ Had enough of the snow and cold already, now happy to say goodbye
winter, as days are warm and snow is gone by now. In memory of those
sunny cold days.
--
new photos ever so often... <http://roman.blakout.net/>
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
Congratulations on your purchase. Odd though to read that when I've just
sold mine and now don't have a digital camera at all ;)
Cory
- Original Message -
From: "Evan Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, Janua
At 5:58 PM -0500 1/23/07, Evan Hanson wrote:
>Well I just got my first Pentax DSLR, a used *ist D. So far I'm
>impressed and when combined with my SMCT 50 1.4, well you know how
>that feels.
Sweet! I am starting to get the hang of my new *ist D, which I've had
for about a month, now. The initia
A very fine combination, indeed! Congratulations. I have shot 2
*istD bodies for the past couple of years.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 2:58:27 PM, you wrote:
EH> Well I just got my first Pentax DSLR, a used *ist D. So far I'm
EH> impressed and when combined with my SMCT 50 1.4, we
Well I just got my first Pentax DSLR, a used *ist D. So far I'm
impressed and when combined with my SMCT 50 1.4, well you know how
that feels.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 03:39 PM, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
After exactly three years on this list, I just want to say goodbye as
I will be leaving the list for quite some time, and indeed perhaps
permanently.
Good luck to you Robert.
Dan Scott
Sorry I'm late on this, Robert. The Digests have become infrequent and
sporadic again, and I'm unfortunately missing quite a bit. Can be a
blessing in disguise though ;-)
Best of luck for the future,
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.maca
Sorry to see you go Rob: maybe you could just tune in from time to time to
see what's happening?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Soames Wetmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 20
I hope the ass-kissing and self-promotion pay off. Please drop us a
line and tell us how you are every once in a while.
Goodbye and good luck!
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Soames Wetmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:39 PM
> To: [EMA
rs on this list, I just want to say goodbye as I
will be leaving the list for quite some time, and indeed perhaps permanently.
Finances arent the best at the moment in fact theyve taken a
significant turn for the worse. Though Im by no means destitute, I am
even considering selling my '75
After exactly three years on this list, I just want to say goodbye as I will
be leaving the list for quite some time, and indeed perhaps permanently.
Finances arent the best at the moment in fact theyve taken a significant
turn for the worse. Though Im by no means destitute, I am even
As an owner of the same lens I still use mine a lot.
Jim a.
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 22:15:26 -0400
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Goodbye, Riken
> Geez, it took me forever to focus that f/4 lens on my Super
> Program. The two-touch operation slowed me down; and the f/4 kept
> the point of focus from snapping in and out with authority.
Yeah, I sometimes get a little annoyed when focusing the A 28-135/4,
but only at wider angles. At "norma
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 10:15 PM
Subject: Goodbye, Rikenon 28-100/4
> Since none of you slobs bought it at my asking price of $90, I decided I'd
just keep it in my car. I used it today in Baltimore during a walk with my
son, who&#
Since none of you slobs bought it at my asking price of $90, I decided I'd just keep
it in my car. I used it today in Baltimore during a walk with my son, who's visiting
from Israel.
Geez, it took me forever to focus that f/4 lens on my Super Program. The two-touch
operation slowed me down; an
Mark, it was good to meet and talk with you @ the bird sanctuary. Hope you
like L.A.
May the light be with you.
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 9:45 PM
Subject: OT: Goodbye Michigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll be looking for poutine at the Iqualuit Burger King...NOT.
> A bientot, tout la gang.
Have a killer trip! Do they have a Burger King in Iqualuit? Bring back
a pic of it!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://
Keep the DEET off the plastics or you will not have any
Sounds like a great trip.Enjoy
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 19:29:04 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Goodbye for a bit
Hey PDMLers,
Equipment: an IQZoom (Espio) 105 WR for
Hey PDMLers,
On Monday I'll unsubscribe for a couple of weeks, so please don't discuss
anything useful or important.
My trip: As a Canadian who's lived in the States for a long time, I got to
missing my roots, and decided that it was time to visit the part of Canada
that has always attracted me,
We spoke to our supplier in Japan today about the non-appearing screens. They
said Pentax no longer supply LX, quoted the discontinue notice (announced
recently on Japan website), and mumbled something about Pentax making a huge
loss on LX & accessories. Nonetheless, we have a back-order with t
Paul,
SOrry to hear that you are leaving the list. GOod luck on your freelance
essay writing and do spent that extra valuable time with the family.
You can also sent a that PDF file too.
Hope that you will drop by occasionally.
Evan Dong
On Fri, 25 May 2001 11:55:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED
Paul,
I will certainly miss your input, especially as I have not long been with
the PDML, and am just getting to know a few of the regulars.
I am trying not to spend too much time on the computer, but I often got
150 - 250 emails(mostly OT) from PDML and VanLUG. I've stopped my
subscription to Va
Paul,
The List, without the Ubershopper!?!
Thanks for all the highly informative posts. Family comes first for me, too.
Have fun with them, take lots of photos, and drop back by once in awhile.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Paul,
I know the feeling about reclaiming your life. I can't imagine subscribing to 3 lists
like this one!
You are generous to lend your lenses and books. It is a joy to share what you have
learned.
Perhaps you could drop by from time to time and tell us how you are doing...maybe even
poin
Hi Paul,
Glad you dropped in for a visit and look-around! Have fun
w/ that SMCTak 85mm f1.8 !8^)
Bill
-
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
It's been a thrilling few months, but I'm afraid that my participation in
three camera-related lists has taken me away from freelance essay writing
(spell-checked, unlike my postings) and my wife and girls. WIth my lens
collection complete, I am quitting all the list (and two others:
rangefinders
On Thu, 24 May 2001, John Francis wrote:
> This email address will no longer work after today,
> so I am unsubscribing from the group. It's been fun.
We're going to miss you... you sure you don't feel like getting another
address?
:)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Hope to see you back soon.
tv
John Francis wrote:
>
> This email address will no longer work after today,
> so I am unsubscribing from the group. It's been fun.
>
> --
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. D
This email address will no longer work after today,
so I am unsubscribing from the group. It's been fun.
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-82952011 N. Shoreline Blvd. MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax) Mountain View,
In a message dated 27/4/01 2:56:25 pm, you wrote:
<>
Today I held one, but not for long. This had no shroud for the shutter
release, but the meter was activated by the pentaprism removal button. It was
sent back to its' kennel.
Natch, the LX is still available, but only from certain dealers
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
