- Original Message -
From: Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, October 14, 2004 1:39 pm
Subject: Re: Problem mounting Vivitar 28mm 1:2 on Pentax MZ-6
> > But, you really don't need the photos - just look at a Pentax
> > K-mount lens and then look at your Viv
- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Wedding"
Subject: Re: Problem mounting Vivitar 28mm 1:2 on Pentax MZ-6
Yes, this lens does have the rather larger flange, compared to
my other lenses which do work okay, that you mention.
Can someone point me to link for the steps to remove i
On 14 Oct 2004 at 9:36, Leigh Wedding wrote:
> Can someone point me to link for the steps to remove it? I also
> took it into a local shop yesterday, and the bloke there said
> "cut it off with an angle grinder" -- which sounds a bit harsh
> to me!
Fred had a few pics some place at one stage ho
> I found the link myself in a previous PDML message:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg109462.html.
...except that you'll have to fix the quoted URL's slightly. (At
least, in my browser, there's a quotation mark and a semicolon
tacked onto the end of each link.) But, you really
> But, you really don't need the photos - just look at a Pentax
> K-mount lens and then look at your Vivitar - you just have to
> remove enough of the extra flange to mkae them look the same (but
> without getting any aluminum filings into the lens, of course).
> Simple. (And heck, if ~I~ can do i
> Can someone point me to link for the steps to remove it? I also
> took it into a local shop yesterday, and the bloke there said "cut
> it off with an angle grinder" -- which sounds a bit harsh to me!
Actually, a grinder makes the job rather simple (and easier than the
jobs I've performed a few
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Wedding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:36 am
Subject: Re: Problem mounting Vivitar 28mm 1:2 on Pentax MZ-6
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> D
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Subject: Re: Problem mounting Vivitar 28mm 1:2 on Pentax MZ-6
> Yep, the lens has a semi-circular flange, which protects the
> aperture
> lever and may s
find the URL.
Leigh Wedding wrote:
Dear All,
My problem is I purchased a second hand Vivitar 28mm 1:2 Auto
Wide-Angle lens, Pentax K-mount. However the lens does not actually
go far enough into my Pentax MZ-6 camera mount to be able to rotate it
to lock into the mount. Is this a known problem
- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Wedding"
Subject: Problem mounting Vivitar 28mm 1:2 on Pentax MZ-6
Dear All,
My problem is I purchased a second hand Vivitar 28mm 1:2 Auto
Wide-Angle lens, Pentax K-mount. However the lens does not
actually
go far enough into my Pentax M
Dear All,
My problem is I purchased a second hand Vivitar 28mm 1:2 Auto
Wide-Angle lens, Pentax K-mount. However the lens does not actually
go far enough into my Pentax MZ-6 camera mount to be able to rotate it
to lock into the mount. Is this a known problem with this lens/body
combination, or
[ I had commented some other stuff here, then I killed the mailer by
mistake... I don't think I'll bother to write it down again, as I didn't
really say anything of consequence (as usual.) ]
Heheh. You should see the other 99% of my photos. Those would clarify
my comments to an extent that woul
Thanks for the warm welcome, all ;-).
Kostas wrote:
OK, forgive me if stating the obvious here.
By all means. I've always wondered why the Litany of All Saints doesn't
contain a Patron Saint of the Obvious (Saint Dûh!, for instance). We need
one. At least I do, more often than I actually care to
John Whittingham wrote:
I would guess that the viewfinder info is the same as on the MZ-3/5n,
but I could be wrong...
Probably, but could you make all necessary adjustments to settings without
taking your eye from the viewfinder? The control layout is very different,
for example I find the
w aren't that bad at all,
especially for a non-photographer. (Now, I hope you weren't fishing for
compliments here...)
Right, back to the MZ-6. Overall, I'm severely impressed by this
thing. I've had it for slightly over a year now, and it has become my
main body. Although I
Cotty wrote:
On 22/8/04, The Diabolical Dr Z, discombobulated, offered:
Later,
Zed (33, male, Amsterdam, NL)
Hi Zed, welcome aboard. Film is obsolete, chuck your MZ-6 in the bin ;-)
Yeah. And film is sooo much work. Better to handle your pictures the
digital way. I mean, you may find
On 22/8/04, The Diabolical Dr Z, discombobulated, offered:
>Later,
>Zed (33, male, Amsterdam, NL)
Hi Zed, welcome aboard. Film is obsolete, chuck your MZ-6 in the bin ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Hello,
After several weeks of newbie lurking, this seems a good moment to drop
in (and introduce myself to the list while I go along). Anyway:
I'm a complete technophobe who generally refuses to use anything made after
~1980, but last year I caved and bought an MZ-6. My main reaso
Mirror prism vs Glass Pentaprism on the MZ-5n.
Toralf Lund wrote:
What are you people's opinion on the MZ-6? I found a new one with a
much-reduced price, so I'm a bit tempted... Seems to me that it's
rather similar to the MZ-5n, but its list price is lower, so there
must be som
Those Penta-mirrors are terrible or so I've been told, the MZ-5/5n/3 are
reasonable but not brilliant with the prism. I guess I was spoilt with the
MX. The viewfinder glass on my MZ-3 is positively awfull to view through, I
use manual focus mainly despite having several AF lenses. The MZ
John Whittingham wrote:
Maybe it's like the IT industry, it just gets better and cheaper but I doubt
it. Chassis may not be the only area where the quality differs, I've never
handled a MZ-6 so I'm not in a position to say.
You've got me curious now, OH NO! NOT ANOTHER CAME
Maybe it's like the IT industry, it just gets better and cheaper but I doubt
it. Chassis may not be the only area where the quality differs, I've never
handled a MZ-6 so I'm not in a position to say.
You've got me curious now, OH NO! NOT ANOTHER CAMERA
John
---
Build quality?!
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pdml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:23:40 +0200
Subject: MZ-6?
> What are you people's opinion on the MZ-6? I found a new one with a
> much-reduced pric
What are you people's opinion on the MZ-6? I found a new one with a
much-reduced price, so I'm a bit tempted... Seems to me that it's rather
similar to the MZ-5n, but its list price is lower, so there must be
something "missing", but what exactly is it? Actually, base
Thanks a lot for all your comments.
I'll definitely look for a 5n as soon as I find a good one on Ebay (or if one of you
has one at a good price).
REgards,
Thibouille
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
> You were right, I liked the MZ-5 so much I went in search of the -5n but
> found a -3 instead.
>
> It would have to be surgically removed from me now, I just wish it had MLU
> and a metal body.
Well, you'd been warned :-)
Kostas
IL PROTECTED]>
To: "pdml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:40:37 -0300
Subject: Re: ZX/MZ-5n vs. ZX-L/MZ-6
> I have an MZ-5N and an MZ-7, which has controls very similar to the
> MZ-6. I find that the "classical" style controls on the 5N make it
> m
now, I just wish it had MLU
and a metal body.
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 13:39:09 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Jo
al Message -
From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6
>
> According to Boz's site the 6/L and the 5n both use SAFOX IV for AF, does
> this mean they should p
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> They both have Safox IV. But MZ-50 an 60 have Safox V (go figure...
> low-end and better AF), MZ-S has SAFOX VII (but was out before the
> MZ-6) and *IST has SAFOX VIII.
The -50, -60 (and -30?) have a 2-sensor AF system.
I think Boz's
I have an MZ-5N and an MZ-7, which has controls very similar to the MZ-6. I
find that the "classical" style controls on the 5N make it much faster and
easier to change manual speeds and +/- EV. Also, after you get used to the
body, the 5N rotating tab switches for motor and metering
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
> MZ-3!
John,
You got an extremely good deal on the -3. Normally it's significantly
more expensive than the -5n and only has faster shutter.
With respect to the original question: this was discussed last week,
have a look at
http://www.mail-archive.
I double checked and was wrong.
They both have Safox IV. But MZ-50 an 60 have Safox V (go figure... low-end and better
AF), MZ-S has SAFOX VII (but was out before the MZ-6) and *IST has SAFOX VIII.
A couple of weird things as usual by Pentax standards so evreything is normal I guess
]
Emne: ZX-L (MZ-6) - Cancelling long exposure
I have a ZX-L (MZ-6). When shooting flash (AF-280T) snapshots of my infant
son, especially with relatives, sometimes I pay so much attention to
capturing his fleeting smiles and other cute expressions that I forget to
wait long enough for the flash to
I have a ZX-L (MZ-6). When shooting flash (AF-280T) snapshots of my infant
son, especially with relatives, sometimes I pay so much attention to
capturing his fleeting smiles and other cute expressions that I forget to
wait long enough for the flash to recycle. Then, if the light is dim
enough it
Leigh Wedding wrote:
I have searched many places on the WWW, and even
read the user manual that came with my MZ-6 camera,
but I have not been able to find which IR remote
control is needed for it. Can someone tell me which it
is?
Thanks,
Leigh.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A
I think the remote of any Pentax P&S will do the job.
Find one and give it a try.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Leigh Wedding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Which IR remote control for MZ-6?
I have searched many place
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Which IR remote control for MZ-6?
I have searched many places on the WWW, and even
read the user manual that came with my MZ-6 camera,
but I have not been able to find which IR remote
control is needed for it
I have searched many places on the WWW, and even
read the user manual that came with my MZ-6 camera,
but I have not been able to find which IR remote
control is needed for it. Can someone tell me which it
is?
Thanks,
Leigh.
Powered by telstra.com
Hello Boris,
Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 12:06:59 PM, you wrote:
BL> Hi!
>>In action program mode, the MZ-6/ZX-L does continous autofocus, but I
>>would like to get that working in shutter priority mode. Does
>>somebody
>>know how to set this up?
>>
>>Attil
Hi!
In action program mode, the MZ-6/ZX-L does continous autofocus, but I
would like to get that working in shutter priority mode. Does
somebody
know how to set this up?
Attila
Unfortunately it is **impossible**. Continious af works only in this
sport mode.
I wish I were a Pentax programmer
Hello,
In France, at sales' time , one could find a MZ-L / MZ-6 / ZX-L for very
cheap. Lunckyer bought it at 90euros/USD with the 28-90mm FA. (average
about 200 euros)
The funniest, was that , in a way, this model has a very popular second
life.
And you know what ? It is now very difficu
Thanks for your replies.
I have never imagined that there can be living organisms inside of my camera
/ lens. That's very nasty and must be avoided. However as the article
(http://www.chem.helsinki.fi/~toomas/photo/fungus/) says: "There is no
recipe which would give you 100% guarantee that you wil
uy a Nikon or Canon. Then I have
examined thoroughly the features and the prices of the respective cameras,
and I accidentally found a Pentax MZ-6. I was amazed. (Still I am:) )
So I have just purchased my first SLR system:
a kit formed by a Pentax MZ-6 camera with Pentax FA 28-90mm f3.5-5.6 lens,
on 16.12.03 13:21, Kostas Kavoussanakis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cobra 750, not Pentax 360. :-)
That's good. I just thought my af360 could be damaged ;-P
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Sylwek wrote:
> on 16.12.03 12:27, Kostas Kavoussanakis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > p.s.: Pity this flash has a blue cast. It is excellent otherwise and
> > quite cheap.
> Blue cast? When? How?
Cobra 750, not Pentax 360. :-)
Kostas
Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit:
Tanya Mayer Photography a écrit:
Ok, guys and gals, here's the thing - I have this combination MZ-6
(ZX-L)
and the AF360fgz. When I purchased the AF360fgz, I read the manual from
front to back, only to discover that many of the options weren't
available
The instruction manual for the 360fgz flash was written BEFORE the
release of the MZ-6, so it can't say anything about the MZ-6 or *istD.
However, as you think, it can be used in P-TTL, wireless and high speed
synchro in conjunction with the MZ-6 and the
Tanya Mayer Photography a écrit:
Ok, guys and gals, here's the thing - I have this combination MZ-6 (ZX-L)
and the AF360fgz. When I purchased the AF360fgz, I read the manual from
front to back, only to discover that many of the options weren't available
unless you were using it wi
on 16.12.03 12:27, Kostas Kavoussanakis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> p.s.: Pity this flash has a blue cast. It is excellent otherwise and
> quite cheap.
Blue cast? When? How?
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
> It
> is very strange to me that in the AF360fgz, Pentax would only refer to the
> MZ-S, when in reality (according to IT'S manual), I am able to use the MZ-6
> in much the same way
When was the one printed and when was
on 16.12.03 12:15, Tanya Mayer Photography at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, guys and gals, here's the thing - I have this combination MZ-6 (ZX-L)
> and the AF360fgz. When I purchased the AF360fgz, I read the manual from
> front to back, only to discover that many of the o
Ok, guys and gals, here's the thing - I have this combination MZ-6 (ZX-L)
and the AF360fgz. When I purchased the AF360fgz, I read the manual from
front to back, only to discover that many of the options weren't available
unless you were using it with an MZ-S (such as high-speed s
Thanks for clearing that one up Bill!
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: Is my MZ-6 a plastic toy? (was: Has Pentax missed again?)
> All Pentax autof
All Pentax autofocus cameras support snap in focus.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Is my MZ-6 a plastic toy? (was: Has Pentax missed again?)
>
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:51:30 +1000, Ryan Lee wrote:
> > Though of course MZ-6 has snap in focus, which though is independent
> > of picture more.
>
> Hasn't the 5n got snap in focus w/ manual lenses too?
The ZX-5/MZ-5 has snap in focus, so I'd think the -5n doe
s on the mode wheel...
Though of course MZ-6 has snap in focus, which though is independent
of picture more.
Hasn't the 5n got snap in focus w/ manual lenses too?
I guess it has. I don't know. I did not get to try that. I suppose
that nothing can prevent any MZ series AF camera to
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 6:06 AM
Subject: Re: Is my MZ-6 a plastic toy? (was: Has Pentax missed again?)
>There's one thing that struck me a
ething everyone's said before..) and it's not
compatible with older lenses. I'm not sure how the 6 compares with the 7
though.
Rgds,
Ryan
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Is my MZ-6 a plastic toy? (was: Has Pentax missed again?)
> Yes, Zenint is cl
Hi!
Do you have any info about the MZ-6 (or other cameras) internal
structure?
Alex Sarbu (who wants Heavy Metal-style cameras. Hmm...
I've heard that Zenits are made from steel :-) )
You're one lucky fellow - I just happen to have MZ-6 and used to have
Zenit back in Moscow.
I
If the MZ-60 (and *ist) looks like a plastic toy, my MZ-6 is closer to
the MZ-5, I guess. The *ist (film) is not for me... it feels like it'll
break in my hands.
I'm wonder, how close to the MZ-5 (and how far from *ist) is the MZ-6? The
top of the camera can be scratched, the back mov
Yes they can, but you have to set aperture on the body
/Paul
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MZ-6/ZX-L with FAJ lenses?
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:19:18 -0400
They cannot work in Av mode. There's n
"Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: MZ-6/ZX-L with FAJ lenses?
> They cannot work in Av mode. There's no aperture ring on the lens.
>
> Bill
>
> - Original Message -
>
They cannot work in Av mode. There's no aperture ring on the lens.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Hillerström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: MZ-6/ZX-L with FAJ lenses?
> The manua
The manual, which I've downloaded, uses examples in Av and M modes where
the aperture is set from the body. So I suppose the FaJ lenses will work.
Thanks
Peter
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Hillerström"
Subject: MZ-6/ZX-L with FAJ lenses?
He
If she plans to use them in shutter preferred AE, or program AE there would
be no problem. If she
wants to set here own aperture then there is a big problem.
At 06:31 PM 10/5/03 +0200, you wrote:
Hello
My wife is planning to buy a MZ-6/ZX-L and I probably will by a *istD
later on. Can the new
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Hillerström"
Subject: MZ-6/ZX-L with FAJ lenses?
> Hello
>
> My wife is planning to buy a MZ-6/ZX-L and I probably will by a *istD
> later on. Can the new FAJ lenses cause any problems with the MZ-6/ZX-L?
> It would be nice if
Hello
My wife is planning to buy a MZ-6/ZX-L and I probably will by a *istD
later on. Can the new FAJ lenses cause any problems with the MZ-6/ZX-L?
It would be nice if we could exchange lenses without any problems.
/Peter
An eyecup for the M series cameras will work and block a lot more light
than any of the ZX/MZ eyecups.
At 02:16 AM 10/5/03 +0200, you wrote:
Hi there!
I bought a brand new MZ-6 (ZX-L) about a month ago as a replacement
for my old PZ-10. So far I like it. The only problem I have
experienced while
Hi there!
I bought a brand new MZ-6 (ZX-L) about a month ago as a replacement
for my old PZ-10. So far I like it. The only problem I have
experienced while shooting on a sunny day was too much light entering
to my viewfinder (preventing me to read the exposure information). I
noticed that MZ
I was a little harsh on the instruction manual - but in the past
I've generally learnt more from Boz's KMP site and this list. The manual for
the MZ-6 seems to be aimed at P&S users who are upgrading.
Cheers,
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi All,
It may seem like a silly question, but can the MZ-6/ZX-L do daylight fill
flash with its built in flash? If so, how?
I almost always use an external flash and so have only just thought of this
after owning the camera for over a year.
The instructions are, as usual, pretty useless.
Cheers
Hi Kostas,
on 06 Sep 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>> flash output compensation on camera.
>Now that I have one, it's time to ask: how do I do this?
Very simple - just turn the exposure compensation dial on the left ;-)
Have fun with your MZ-5n - I love mine!
Cheers, Heiko
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Boris Liberman wrote:
> 3. There is an undocumented feature of 5n - you can actually set up
> flash output compensation on camera.
Now that I have one, it's time to ask: how do I do this?
Thanks,
Kostas
rits of MZ-5n and MZ-6.
And the winner is...
...the MZ-5n. I got a used one for an unbelievable price (though
missing all the trim). I realise that I lost out on both better flash
capabilities and user interface (I still think that the MZ-5n made a
bad job not using the intuitive round lever a
No, but the corners of the image in the viewfinder were considerably darker
than they should have been. Though when one looks at real world image, not
the uniformly lit and colored wall in their office this effect is hardly
noticeable on any of the cameras.
There is something about the M/A35/2.8
Hi!
My reply is between lines of your message.
1. -5n has penta prism, -6 has penta mirror. For instance recently I
mounted M 35/2.8 and observed heavy vignetting in the viewfinder of
-6
with somewhat less vignetting in case of -5n - my co-worker has one,
so I could try.
What do you mean by that
Coming back, I hope that it's still interesting (and that people may
refer to it in the future).
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Boris Liberman wrote:
> you. I couldn't make my wife take either of ZX-L or ME Super and start
> shooting though she did press the shutter release couple of times.
I am struggli
Hi!
KK> I do have (one FA 28-80 3.5-5.6 too many, in fact) AF lenses, and I
KK> need to have at least one, for the wife. It is also that the Cobra
KK> AF-750 won't work on the ME, and that I don't have the time for the
KK> hassle of maintaining an old camera. Though I may change my mind :-)
I see
See below
> According to Boz's site and also Pentax UK's, they both have
> DOF preview, but according to Pentax US, the MZ-6 (OK, MZ-L)
> does not. Can someone (preferably from the UK) clarify this
> for me please?
Its been awhile since these discussions, but I am pretty pos
- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" I am looking forward to hearing people's
> opinions on the viewfinder of the MZ-5n, hoping I will finally tell
> them apart.
I have no experience at all with the L/6 but I do have the 5N here in Sunny
Georgia.
It's not a great viewfinde
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> What do you mean by better viewfinder? I don't really care about the
> technical superiority, the effect is what I am after. I cannot really
> understand the numbers on the technical spec, and, from the search I
> made on the archive, it does not l
Hi Kostas,
I went out of my way to find a -5n (now
discontinued)and paid quite a bit more for it than the
MZ-6 (or ZX-L as is here in the US). I had some good
reasons for doing this.
1) The spot meter function on the -6 is only available
as a custom function mode of the memory lock button.
Not
Hi!
Welcome. Well Kostas, I was in the same position exactly when I was
after my camera a year ago. MZ-6 can do DOF preview. It has a button
that does just that. MZ-6 does not have a panoramic mode though which
MZ-5n seems to have. Perhaps you got confused between the two.
Now, I chose MZ-6
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> According to Boz's site and also Pentax UK's, they both have
> DOF preview, but according to Pentax US, the MZ-6 (OK, MZ-L)
> does not. Can someone (preferably from the UK) clarify this
> for me please?
Its been awhile s
tting every time I change the aperture. I am thinking of
upgrading and pondering on the merits of MZ-5n and MZ-6.
According to Boz's site and also Pentax UK's, they both have
DOF preview, but according to Pentax US, the MZ-6 (OK, MZ-L)
does not. Can someone (preferably from the UK) clar
rence Kwan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Alternative to the 360 FGZ AF flash on Mz 6
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Peter Patershuk wrote:
> > I am not sure if I should save for longer and buy the 360 FGZ flash for
Thanks Joe,
I will look into those. Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pdml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Alternative to the 360 FGZ AF flash on Mz 6
> Try Sigma, Sunpak, Metz.
>
> Joe
>
Try Sigma, Sunpak, Metz.
Joe
which
> does not work.
>
> Can anyone point me to a site or give some instructions how to make
> the
> cable release? I guess that the only thing i need is what type of
> connector it has and what each pin does, as the 3-wire concept is
> probably the same.
I have added s
Hi!
> I have added schema for cable release for MZ-6 on my French web:
> ..
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/bricolage.htm
> No MZ-6 available so not tested !
Thanks a lot! (Babelfish rules :)
I think I have a 2.5 mm connector somewhere around the house, i'll test it
some d
Hello!
I was looking for some instructions how to make my own cable release for
ZX-L, searched the web, but it didn't turn up anything, except a link in
pdml faq: http://members.iinet.au/~celsim/mz6/cablerelease.htm, which
does not work.
Can anyone point me to a site or give some instructions
Hi,
Stumpf Krzysztof wrote:
> I have only metz
> SCA 372 adapter (for Pentax old cameras) I wonder how the
> adapter SCA 372 works with the pentax MZ 6 camera. Maybe
> somebody use this configuration ?
I don't have an MZ6, but using SCA372 on SFXn and Z1P.
It works fine. The
I think that the SCA 374 / 2 AF was better than the 372.
thierry
Stumpf Krzysztof a écrit:
Hi
I have just bought the Metz MZ 1 flash. Unfortunaly I have only metz SCA
372 adapter (for Pentax old cameras)
I wonder how the adapter SCA 372 works with the pentax MZ 6 camera.
Maybe somebody use
Hi
I have just bought the Metz MZ 1 flash. Unfortunaly I have only metz SCA
372 adapter (for Pentax old cameras)
I wonder how the adapter SCA 372 works with the pentax MZ 6 camera.
Maybe somebody use this configuration ?
Regards
Chris
Henry wrote:
> I agree with your belief that Pentax did show something very good under the
> table in Photokina 2002. But is there any chance that this new product is
> still under early development? Pentax felt the heavy pressure from the
> distributers to release something immediately and
Dear all,
Pål Jensen wrote:
I think you're being too pessimistic. It was explicitely expressed to me
that >this was not another MR-52 stunt. Pentax couldn't afford that and
they would >loose all credibility if they did. Although they haven't shown
it to the public, >they have claimed that the
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 03:56 PM, Michael Perham wrote:
Perhaps it might look something like the new Canon Rebel ...personally
it
doesn't turn my crank but it is contemporary.
Cheers, Mike.
Cripes.
Dan Scott
I can say that I find my Optio very stylish and sophisticated looking. I've
had comments made to me about that. How well that would work with a new
series, I don't know, but it works with the Optios at any rate!
> From: Pål Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com]
> I have no idea what it looks
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com]
I have no idea what it looks like just that it is different from Pentax
current slr offerings and that it is supposedly stunning looking. As pure
speculation, I would not be surprised if it takes design cues from the
sucessful Pentax Optio digital
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
