Well, after all I went through to get my old scanner going with Vista,
I went ahead and bought a new one. NewEgg had the Epson V30 on sale
for 50.00 including shipping. It arrived this afternoon, Wow! Does
this thing work nicely!
I rescanned a couple of the F4B crash prints and they are a huge
On 22/12/07, Bill Owens, discombobulated, unleashed:
The wife DID order the Veho scanner for me for Christmas, meaning only 2 1/2
days until I see it.
Bill you're a naughty boy!!!
Right, you tell Phyllis I said you have to be in bed no later than 9.30
Christmas Eve, and if you so much as go
Let us know how that works. My sister has my father's slides, but
I've got enough of my own to keep me busy all winter.
Regards, Bob S.
On Dec 22, 2007 10:38 PM, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wife DID order the Veho scanner for me for Christmas, meaning only 2 1/2
days until I see
Don't forget to act suprised.:-)
Dave
On Dec 22, 2007 11:38 PM, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wife DID order the Veho scanner for me for Christmas, meaning only 2 1/2
days until I see it. From the reviews I've read it does an acceptable job
when slides and negs are scanned into
The wife DID order the Veho scanner for me for Christmas, meaning only 2 1/2
days until I see it. From the reviews I've read it does an acceptable job
when slides and negs are scanned into PSE. I have many of my father's
family snapshots taken on Kodachrome back as far as the late 40's or early
Thanks Godders, I'll give it a try...
Norm
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Vuescan is a scanning application, in the same vein as SilverFast. I
prefer using it as it lends more control of scanning specifics, is
less expensive, and is constantly being updated/tuned by its author.
And it's also
Am too...
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip If you think about it, I've now gone digital...
No you haven't...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Don't argue with frank, he's didgiboy now.
Norm Baugher wrote:
Am too...
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip If you think about it, I've now gone digital...
No you haven't...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
All dogs have four
On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to
scan BW 6x7 negs. As a complete novice, I was just wondering if anyone
could give me a few basic tips (other than don't slam your fingers in
the cover). I'm using the
It's waay cool Frankie. Just trying to figure out how to use the
damn thing. If you think about it, I've now gone digital...
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to
scan BW 6x7
On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip If you think about it, I've now gone digital...
No you haven't...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well, half way grin.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip If you think about it, I've now gone digital...
No
I drive the V700 with Vuescan. It just works.
G
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Norm Baugher wrote:
Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to
scan BW 6x7 negs. As a complete novice, I was just wondering if
anyone
could give me a few basic tips (other than don't
Can you extrapolate a little more on Vuescan?
Norm
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I drive the V700 with Vuescan. It just works.
G
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Norm Baugher wrote:
Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to
scan BW 6x7 negs. As a complete novice, I
Vuescan is a scanning application, in the same vein as SilverFast. I
prefer using it as it lends more control of scanning specifics, is
less expensive, and is constantly being updated/tuned by its author.
And it's also 'generic' ... it drives a whole bunch of different
scanners rather than
Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to
scan BW 6x7 negs. As a complete novice, I was just wondering if anyone
could give me a few basic tips (other than don't slam your fingers in
the cover). I'm using the SilverFast software that came with the scanner.
TIA,
Norm
I have a Polaroid Sprintscan 4000. It's a great scanner, but the
problem is that it had a scsi interface. So for a few years now it
forced me to keep my old Windows PC around.
I bought this:
http://www.ratocsystems.com/english/products/FR1SX.html
It's a SCSI-Firewire interface. I just tried it,
Excellent. I don't have a SCSI scanner but I do have a SCSI ZIP drive
and a lot of old ZIP discs with photo scans on them. I used to have a
SCSI card in my Mac, but it seems to be incompatible with System 10.4.
Paul
On Mar 25, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:
I have a Polaroid Sprintscan
AFAIK, Juan, that's correct. I used VueScan about a year and a half ago,
and certainly didn't have the Pro edition yet I got the 16-bit files.
However, tings may have changed since I last checked, although on this
point it's doubtful.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Juan Buhler
Speaking of
On Mar 25, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:
Speaking of Vuescan--if all I want to do is save 16 bit scans, to be
processed in PS later, I don't really need to get the pro version,
right?
I've been using Vuescan for a very long time.
The differences between the standard and pro versions
Hi all,
For those who may be interested.
I've been working on a panoramic scan from the new Minolta Multi Pro
scanner this evening. I remembered that I had an old scan of the same
slide from my HP S20 so I figured it might be interesting to put up a
web page to show the difference.
The photo
Just wanted to share my excitement ... today I ordered a new, Nikon
Coolscan ;-))) No more borrowing computer and scanner time. I can now
annoy you with even more pictures LOL
Shel Belinkoff
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to share my excitement ... today I ordered a new, Nikon
Coolscan ;-))) No more borrowing computer and scanner time. I can
now
annoy you with even more pictures LOL
Congrats Shel! Which one did you get?
Mark
you let out when you tried to use it LOL
Shel Belinkoff
[Original Message]
From: Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 6/2/2004 7:27:18 PM
Subject: Re: Yay! New scanner on the way!
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to share my excitement ... today I
Shel, you're never an annoyance.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just wanted to share my excitement ... today I ordered a new, Nikon
Coolscan ;-))) No more borrowing computer and scanner time. I can now
annoy you with even more pictures LOL
Shel Belinkoff
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 10:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Epson 3200 (was: New Scanner)
I was using the silverfast plugin. I made a 4x9 holder out
of cardboard today and tried scanning
: Thursday, December 25, 2003 8:42 PM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: Epson 3200 (was: New Scanner)
JC,
Sorry for the late response, but I've only just been catching up on PDML
mails since Nov.
Love the 3200. No big issues with it, scans beautifully. Only minor
quibbles:
* Wish the 120 film holder could
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 8:42 PM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: Epson 3200 (was: New Scanner)
JC,
Sorry for the late response, but I've only just been catching up on PDML
mails since Nov.
Love the 3200. No big issues with it, scans beautifully. Only minor
Hey,
I did find a quirk with the 3200 that I must share with you.
I tried scanning a 8x10 negative assuming I would be able to
get a 4x9 crop of it because that is the size of the overhead
lamp. I did not use any of the film holders, I just laid the
negative on the glass.
Result?
I thought the
Like this?
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/holga/police_trafalfar_square_bad_scan
(hmm, looks like I can't spell... ;-)
I deduced that the scanner needs the first centimetre or so of the glass
to be left uncovered, as it uses that distance to calibrate the sensor.
If you look at the plastic
JC,
Sorry for the late response, but I've only just been catching up on PDML
mails since Nov.
Love the 3200. No big issues with it, scans beautifully. Only minor
quibbles:
* Wish the 120 film holder could do strips instead of one frame at a time.
* The Epson photoshop driver could be better.
or the
Limiteds, but since several lens testing sites place them at about the same
resolution as the my FA* 80-200, i would expect the same as it.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: New
Still, YOU didn't see the results, YOU didn't make a comparison ... you are
relying on what someone else told you. Let's end the discussion. It's no
longer serving any purpose.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
shel
Herb Chong wrote:
he scanned some of my slides (for free) and said don't
.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: New scanner
Still, YOU didn't see the results, YOU didn't make a comparison ... you
are
relying on what someone else told you. Let's end
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Club M42 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 12:35 AM
Subject: New scanner
I bought a new film scanner, a Epson 3200 to replace
my 3 year old 2450. The 2450 was nice but this one
is supposed to be much faster
This model has gotten great reviews and only cost
I find the results from the 3200 better than my old HP S20.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: New scanner
You're going to use a flatbed scanner for 35mm negatives? Say
The Epson 3200 will produce nice scans from 35mm film. Scanned at 3200
and ized to 300dpi, you get a print of approximagely 10 x13. I've shown
some of mine to the lab guys. They were sure I had shot them on 6x7.
Paul
On Saturday, November 29, 2003, at 01:44 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You're
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: New scanner
You're going to use a flatbed scanner for 35mm negatives? Say it isn't
so, Joe!
These Epsons have a light source in the lid, so there isn't the kludge of
adding an adaptor and mirrors and whatnot.
The 2450 does
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: New scanner
You're going to use a flatbed scanner for 35mm negatives? Say it isn't
so, Joe!
These Epsons have a light source in the lid, so there isn't the kludge of
adding
I bought the 3200 scanner in August and I'm very happy with it. It's
straightforward to use, and does great scans with negs or prints, with very
good shadow detail. When scanning negs, particularly images with dark
backgrounds, use Normal preview, rather than Auto, as it may crop part
of the
Some comments on the S20 inline:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: New scanner
Is a 2400 dpi HP S20 a film scanner?
What about comparisons with a 2800 dpi film scanner? Have you had a
chance to
compare?
A big part of why I'm asking
that they
return the files to me on. places that charge less don't do a good enough
job for me. colors are off or there is way too much dust.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: New
I read someones comment one that 385 megabytes was the minimum files size for
professional images. Maybe you ought to keep that in mind, Shel (GRIN).
I also read where most of the folks who have a lot of achived images to
digitalize have already dones so, and they are not going to redo all that
Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: New scanner
Depends on the resolution and the equipment used. Prices start at about
$25.00
... however, one lab may be renting their Imacons, so I can get up
to correct them. i don't shoot BW anymore. if a slide looks like
it might be interesting as BW, i convert using the Channel mixer.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: New scanner
So
The HP S20 is the old Hewlitt Packard Photosmart scanner. It was an
inexpensive, but surprisingly good scanner for it's time.
I had it's predecssor, the S10, which IIRC, wasn't improved on very much
with the new model.
I'd question that. I, too, had an S10, which I eventually replaced with
No ... since a flatbed can't make hi-res scans. Yes, if all you're doing is
counting scans, but if you consider the quality, then the fb can never be
amortized ... apples and oranges, imo.
graywolf wrote:
So basically 30 scans would pay for the scanner?
Herb Chong wrote:
how much do you
What is a professional image?
graywolf wrote:
I read someones comment one that 385 megabytes was the minimum files size for
professional images.
Have you ever scanned at 8000dpi with an Imacon or similar scanner, and then
compared the results to a consumer scanner like the Nikon Coolscan 4000?
Herb Chong wrote:
having done a lot of scanning of Provia 100F and Velvia at 4000dpi, i don't
seen anything except more film grain unless
I certainly don't know. The magazines I shoot for want 40 megabyte
files. The stock house I shoot for wants 40 megabyte files. My Epson
3200 will yield just about exactly that when scanning 35mm full frame.
When I scan medium format, I still scan full frame at 3200, then
downsize in PhotoShop.
I can see details of the grain when scanning 6x7 film on my Epson 3200.
When printing it out on my Epson 1200 printer, the resolution is as
good as I can get from the local pro labs on a C-Print. But perhaps the
labs aren't all that good. (They do produce most of the work for some
local big
clouds are not going to help me in any way.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: New scanner
Have you ever scanned at 8000dpi with an Imacon or similar scanner, and
then
compared
There's more to it than details of the grain.
One of the things I noticed was increased sharpness on most scans, due, I'm
sure, to the way the Imacons hold the slide against the drum and the more
even scanning the drum scanner provides, as well as better shadow detail and
better separation in the
LOL I just wrote Paul that you'd probably jump in with a criticism of my
position, and bingo, here you are.
OK, let's leave it at this: you're right for what you do, and I'm right for what
I do and from what I've seen. IMO, the Nikon is a consumer scanner, although a
good one. One thing that's
Herb Chong wrote:
well, i bought a Nikon 4000ED and i have done about 1000 scans with it so
far. every now and then, i wish i had bought the mounted slide feeder, but i
haven't, so i have to do it the hard way, one at a time. it takes about
40-50 mounted slides at once. i experimented some
the difference even has a chance of showing up isn't as high as
you would like.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: New scanner
There's more to it than details of the grain
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Butch Black wrote:
A friend of mine gave me some MF and LF scans done on an Epson 2450. The
files were 20-30MB PSD files (Photoshop) I was amazed at the quality. It's
still not ideal for 35mm although it may compare favorably with the S20.
All this talk finally inspired me
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: New Scanner
Could you guys please try a 4X5 tranny scan at max resolution
( which I assume is 3200 ppi) and report the scan time
to me? With the 2450 (2400 ppi) it takes about 20 minutes
which is quite annoying
John
time
to me? With the 2450 (2400 ppi) it takes about 20 minutes
which is quite annoying
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Scanner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Is the negative in contact with glass at all
when
doing a transparency
scan on the 2450? If so, any issues w/ newton rings, and keeping the
glass clean?
-Mat
Mat.
The 2450,and i assume the 3200, have plastic holders for 35mm,120,mounted slides
-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: New Scanner
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: New Scanner
Could you guys please try a 4X5 tranny scan at max resolution
( which I assume is 3200 ppi
You are correct about the carrier holding the neg above the glass.
Depending on the size of the negative, you can get some sag in the
middle. I am scanning 67 negs and find that strips do better than
single negs because the strip helps hold the neg more evenly. I would
guess that 4X5 would have
Yes it was to you Dave :D
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring a few 35mm slides over, we can
compare.
Not sure Brendan,was this directed at moi,or some
one else.If its moi i have a few i can
bring over.
Dave
of
DOF.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Mat Maessen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Scanner
Is the negative in contact with glass at all when doing a transparency
scan on the 2450? If so, any issues w/ newton
I've never seen a sheet of 4in x 5in film sag in a glassless carrier, but
I'm not so sure that an unsupported sheet wouldn't pop due to heat in a
condenser enlarger. That's not a problem I'd expect from a scanner.
When you think about it, sheet film is barely supported in the film holder
when an
Just got home with a new Epson Perfection 3200 scanner. I'm looking forward
to installing it and trying it out later today, but in the meantime...
Anybody know how it compares with the HP S20 for 35mm?
How much better should I expect my medium format scans moving up from 1200
to 3200 dpi?
Bill
Hi Bill,
Congrats on the new scanner.
The Medium Format scanning is wonderful - I'm sure you'll have no issues
with it as Epson seems to continue to better their products with time.
I can't speak to the 35mm as I use a dedicated film scanner for that.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message
Just got home with a new Epson Perfection
3200 scanner. I'm looking forward
to installing it and trying it out later today, but in the meantime...
Anybody know how it compares with the HP S20 for 35mm?
How much better should I expect my medium
acceptable.
Bruce
Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 7:41:37 AM, you wrote:
dcsc Hi Bill,
dcsc Congrats on the new scanner.
dcsc The Medium Format scanning is wonderful - I'm sure you'll have no issues
dcsc with it as Epson seems to continue to better their products with time.
dcsc I can't speak
Bill,
A friend of mine gave me some MF and LF scans done on an Epson 2450. The
files were 20-30MB PSD files (Photoshop) I was amazed at the quality. It's
still not ideal for 35mm although it may compare favorably with the S20.
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to
Bring a few 35mm slides over, we can compare.
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
I just got the new HP Scanjet 5500c, the one with a photo
feeder on top. So far I'm very pleased with the results. I
posted an example here. I didn't alter the original scan at all.
http://www.beyondthepath.com/photos/news/petals3a.jpg
I just got the new HP Scanjet 5500c, the one with a photo feeder on top.
So far I'm very pleased with the results. I posted an example here. I
didn't alter the original scan at all.
Here's the link:
http://www.beyondthepath.com/photos/news/petals3a.jpg
I think how much RAM you have has an impact on that.
Len
---
Does anyone know how much data Win98 can address before going
smurt?
Thanks
William Robb
_
Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN!
Does the 2450 lay the negs on the glass platen, or is there another
mechanism there?
(sick of the newton rings my Umax 4450 loves to put any and everywhere)
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com- photography and
and it was the best of the samples.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 04, 2002 08:54
Subject: Re: Re[2]: New scanner
Does the 2450 lay the negs on the glass platen, or is there another
mechanism there?
(sick of the newton rings
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, David Brooks wrote:
The scanner comes with 3 holders,one for 35mm
strips,on for mounted slides and one for MF negs.
I dont know the spec but they are off the glass by about
2-3 mm at least.
I thought about raising my own negs off the glass iwht some sort of
holder, execpt
Hello
I too have read on several occasions - in computer mags - that Windows 98 will not
benefit from more than 512 MB of RAM. You may have 1G installed but maybe it makes no
difference; you would have to do a test to confirm. Certainly I found the move from
256 to 384 insignificant. 128 to
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I too have read on several occasions - in computer mags - that Windows 98
will not benefit from more than 512 MB of RAM. You may have 1G installed
but maybe it makes no difference; you would have to do a test to confirm.
Certainly I found
This is also my understanding of Win 9x RAM usage. If one could generate a 550mb scan
file, I'm not sure why they would do it. To get the entire file into RAM, along with
the rest OS and app, would take GB's of RAM and still run very slow. If you want to
see the best that it can do on a 4x5,
From the SOYO support site
(http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:xbI5pX5sZ_8C:www.soyousa.com/support/index.php%3Fanswer_id%3D97+512mb+limit+in+windows+98hl=enie=UTF-8):
Win98/98SE/ME can't handle more than 512 megs of memory
It transpires that Win ME, Win98 and Win95 cannot deal with main
are know to fall to pieces with files
like that.
(I havn't even seen my post and you already replied?)
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: New scanner
Message text written by INTERNET
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the SOYO support site
(http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:xbI5pX5sZ_8C:www.soyousa.com/support/
index.php%3Fanswer_id%3D97+512mb+limit+in+windows+98hl=enie=UTF-8):
Win98/98SE/ME can't handle more than 512 megs of memory
Use the
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its not the board, its the way '98 was
made. Optimum ram for '98 is 128MB,
anything over that is overkill
I have 2, one an Asus and one a Gigabyte,
both have had a gig and more in it and only
NT has been able to access it. It could
be as simple
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use the MaxFileCache setting in the System.ini file to reduce the maximum
amount of memory that Vcache uses to 512 megabytes (524,288 KB) or less.
For
additional information about how to use the MaxFileCache setting, click the
article number below
Let me know your impressions of the scanner. I'm curious.
Bruce
Me too.
Jeff.
Hi all,
The new Agfa Arcus 1200 arrived today. I've taken the opportunity to have a
play and I've scanned one of my panoramic slides and put it online at:
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/photography/panoramas/pan2.html
The photo was taken using a Mamiya RB67, with a home-made adaptor so
I've had a couple of days to play with my new Minolta Dimage (what a silly word)
Scan Multi so I thought I'd share my initial impressions.
35mm
Although, at 2820dpi, it's only marginally higher in resolution than my old HP
Photosmart S20, the image quality is *vastly* superior. I was just
Cool Elephant Whiskers Mark! Just kidding. The whole time it was loading I
thought it was part of an elephant. Quite nice.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:57 AM
Subject: New scan
"aimcompute" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool Elephant Whiskers Mark! Just kidding. The whole time it was loading I
thought it was part of an elephant. Quite nice.
Ah, now I have a name for it! Since my leaf close-up was called "Dinosaur Skin"
I don't see why this can't be clled "Elephant
91 matches
Mail list logo
