The heading of that last message should have been "November PUG - Countdown"
You still have a week and a half!
(Blame lack of caffeine this AM)
Cheers
Brian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
Hayes was a Pima.. not Navajo
On 2/25/2019 8:42 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
One of whom (of the flag raisers) was Ira Hayes, a Navajo. Peter
LaFarge wrote a moving ballad about him and his struggles and demise
after the war. it was most famously performed by Johnny Cash, but
Peter recorded it a
Oops, I forgot a couple of details. I had been wandering around showing
off a metal print of this photo, which I considered worth showing off:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/42922334624
and someone bought it from me. It does work well in metal, and was
meant as a test print, rather
Better
On 4/23/2018 13:48, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Oops - bad links - unless you're sitting at my computer...
Our two winter storms a week and a half ago dropped about 10 inches of snow on
us. It has finally melted enough to reveal some spring flowers.
Snow drops...
http://www.studio194
://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Oops - bad links - unless you're sitting at my computer...
Our two winter storms a week and a half ago dropped about 10 inches of
snow on us. It has finally melted enough to reveal some s
Always nice to see and these are no
exception, Dan.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 23, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Lovely!
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Paul Sore
Lovely!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Oops - bad links - unless you're sitting at my computer...
>
> Our two winter storms a week and a half ago dropped about 10 inches of
> snow on us
One more try for the gallery...Argghhh
Forwarded Message
Subject:Vestiges of Spring - Oops -
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:48:54 -0500
From: Paul Sorenson
Organization: Studio1941
To: PDML
Oops - bad links - unless you're sitting at my computer...
Ou
Oops - bad links - unless you're sitting at my computer...
Our two winter storms a week and a half ago dropped about 10 inches of
snow on us. It has finally melted enough to reveal some spring flowers.
Snow drops...
http://www.studio1941.com/Spring%20Flowers/#img=Spring%20Flowers326
That's a OOPS there. It's 58.0.2 that hosed my browser.
I had 58.0.1 on my mind because I was trying to find a way to roll back
to it.
On 2/17/2018 03:15, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
John wrote:
DO NOT UPGRADE
Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS
G'day all
If you tried to view the December PUG and kept seeing the November
gallery - that's because I forgot to change the softlink.
Fortunately Igor noticed and fixed the problem, so it works properly
now.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Austral
On 2015-07-17 11:05 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
The only way (unless you are willing to install some additional crap from
Adobe) to disable autoupdates is to create a new register key value:
on Mac i use Little Snitch to block such things temporarily or permanently
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mark,
Yep. I actually had a bunch of Adobe entries in the hosts file, but,
apparently, Reader DC uses yet some different host/set of hosts.
I was surprised that it started auto-updating itself this morning.
Thanks for the reminder, zonealarm is a very useful tool. I don't
have it on this lap
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>[rant]
>
>Adobe seems to be on a power-play streak.
>We recently discussed their new arm-twisting decisions about LR and
>pushing people into the Cloud.
>
>I just discovered that the new Adobe Reader DC has the autoupdates
>enabled by default and the option/preference to dis
[rant]
Adobe seems to be on a power-play streak.
We recently discussed their new arm-twisting decisions about LR and
pushing people into the Cloud.
I just discovered that the new Adobe Reader DC has the autoupdates
enabled by default and the option/preference to disable them is removed.
The
I also, ann. Decided not to fain intellect. I guess pompous just isn't me. ;)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 11:59:51 AM
Subject: Re: Dos Pesos : Play Here, doggonit (oops!)
On 8/26/2014 11:04, Bru
On 8/26/2014 11:04, Bruce Walker wrote:
You're right Ann, I missed the 2nd link with the cute pup in it;
sorry. But I saw him on FB, and offered a caption, so hopefully I'm
absolved. (Poor grammar? Whatevs. :) )
:-) All is forgiven - it was partly my fault anyway.
Play Here is full of fasci
You're right Ann, I missed the 2nd link with the cute pup in it;
sorry. But I saw him on FB, and offered a caption, so hopefully I'm
absolved. (Poor grammar? Whatevs. :) )
Play Here is full of fascinating detail. Looks like a neighborhood in
transition? It reminds me I planned to study doorways in
thanks Dan, yes he is adorable.
ann
On 8/25/2014 21:53, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Two intriguing images, Ann. That is one cute dog.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Oh dear - that isn't the right link!!
No won
Two intriguing images, Ann. That is one cute dog.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Oh dear - that isn't the right link!!
> No wonder a couple of comments didnt make sense to me
>
> These two snaps are the ones
Oh dear - that isn't the right link!!
No wonder a couple of comments didnt make sense to me
These two snaps are the ones I meant to show - the one of the old
building reflection was one I did a while back.
Ok this is PLAY HERE
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/Very-recent-NYC/i-
Hey All,
Thanks for your comments on the Tamron and Pentax mid-length macros. This
was very helpful information.
Cheers
Barry
Barry Rice, Ph.D.
Sarracenia.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please v
HI Barry -
I have an older version of the Tamron - the 90mm f2.8 auto focus - and
the DFA Pentax 100mm Macro (non WR). Both are excellent lenses but the
biggsest difference I notice is the the Pentax has the quick-shift focus
adjustment which makes manually fine tuning focus very quick and eas
on 2014-06-16 14:11 Stanley Halpin wrote
I am quite surprised to see the Amazon pricing on the two Pentax lenses. I
would have expected the newer WR lens to be the same or more than the D FA; the
Amazon links show the WR to be a couple hundred $ less? Now you’ve got me
thinking… I may sell the
Quoting Barry Rice :
Hey Brian,
Thanks for your input. You answered what was perhaps my most critical
question. Good to see that Tamron has graced Pentax with a dedicated model,
instead of just Canon and Nikon.
Sadly one of the few. I think this and the 10-24 (which I also have)
are the
Barry - I can’t give you specific detailed comments on the two Pentax lenses.
But I have never heard anybody complain about the image quality from any Pentax
macro- that has always seemed to be a particular niche for them. Using them in
AF mode is a challenge, they will tend to be slower than mo
Hey Brian,
Thanks for your input. You answered what was perhaps my most critical
question. Good to see that Tamron has graced Pentax with a dedicated model,
instead of just Canon and Nikon.
How does the focus on the AF Tamron feel?
Barry
Barry Rice, Ph.D.
Sarracenia.com
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
Hi Barry
Quoting Barry Rice :
Hey Folks,
Long time reader to this list, although I tend to be very sporadic. (By
the way, sorry if this is a duplicate posting, but I reposted in plain text
in case it was necessary.)
It is!
I had the 90mm f2.5 adaptall for many years, using it for much t
Hey Folks,
Long time reader to this list, although I tend to be very sporadic. (By
the way, sorry if this is a duplicate posting, but I reposted in plain text
in case it was necessary.)
So, I do a lot of plant macro work for stock photography. I never use my
camera off-tripod. Also, with my K
On 11/10/2013 1:57 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
looks like I forgot to plug in the server this morning. Sorry about that.
Carry on, then.
oh, for those of you who have my personal email address, please note
it has changed. Same same, but different domain: dougbrewerphotography
dot com. Update as yo
looks like I forgot to plug in the server this morning. Sorry about that.
Carry on, then.
oh, for those of you who have my personal email address, please note it
has changed. Same same, but different domain: dougbrewerphotography dot
com. Update as you feel the need. And thanks to those of you
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:05:03AM -0400, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Well done, Larry. Very good for on the spot reportage photography,
> and great documentation. The insurance companies should purchase
> these images.
>
> I also like you portfolio of crash images. Quite an interesting collecti
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:40:07AM -0400, knarf wrote:
> The first one and 10790 really stand out.
Thanks.
Also, thanks to Dan, Godfrey and Bruce.
>
> Hope no one was hurt too badly.
Nobody was hurt too badly to leave the scene, on foot.
If you look at my other wreck photos, the woman drivin
Good stuff of bad stuff.
Godfrey
On Aug 22, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I wasn't planning on taking any photos tonight.
>
> I was sitting at my computer, and heard a familiar squeel-thump! Though it
> was more of a clang than a thump. I grabbed my cell phone and camera and
> wal
The first one and 10790 really stand out.
Hope no one was hurt too badly.
Cheers,
frank
Larry Colen wrote:
>I wasn't planning on taking any photos tonight.
>
>I was sitting at my computer, and heard a familiar squeel-thump! Though
>it was more of a clang than a thump. I grabbed my cell phone an
I like that first shot. The haze, silhouetting light, a bit of motion
blur, the composition; all good!
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I wasn't planning on taking any photos tonight.
>
> I was sitting at my computer, and heard a familiar squeel-thump! Though it
> was more o
Well done, Larry. Very good for on the spot reportage photography,
and great documentation. The insurance companies should purchase
these images.
I also like you portfolio of crash images. Quite an interesting collection.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, A
I wasn't planning on taking any photos tonight.
I was sitting at my computer, and heard a familiar squeel-thump! Though it was
more of a clang than a thump. I grabbed my cell phone and camera and walked up
to the twin bridges. As I walked up I called 911 when I saw a car facing
southbound in th
Damn, that wasn't supposed to go to the whole list. Sorry folks.
On Sep 1, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> The package showed up today.
>
> Should I just paypal you the postage?
>
> Larry
>
> On Aug 19, 2012, at 8:02 PM, steve harley wrote:
>
>> on 2012-08-19 15:25 Larry Colen wrote
On Sep 5, 2011, at 12:36 PM, steve harley wrote:
> i have made a photo project of my own garden, documenting every plant, using
> the unfolding seasons as a way to practice
I had that thought for a string of parks here in Atlanta, the Olmsted Linear
Parks, called such because they and the surr
On 2011-09-05 07:42 , Eric Weir wrote:
Beginning to hear about "urban agriculture" in Atlanta, i.e., gardening, even
farming, as a way to make a living in the city.
I've thought about it is a photography project. And made a tentative start.
Denver is thick with such -- the NSAs (neighborhood
On Sep 4, 2011, at 8:30 PM, steve harley wrote:
> On 2011-09-04 17:55 , Eric Weir wrote:
>> You've referred to "our farm." Are you talking about a CSA farm, or do you
>> actually own a farm. [I sure wish I did.]
>
> "our farm share" -- it's a CSA; we do have a few fruits, herbs and an annual
>
On 2011-09-04 17:55 , Eric Weir wrote:
You've referred to "our farm." Are you talking about a CSA farm, or do you
actually own a farm. [I sure wish I did.]
"our farm share" -- it's a CSA; we do have a few fruits, herbs and an annual
vegetable garden at home, along with a large non-food garden
On Sep 4, 2011, at 4:45 PM, steve harley wrote:
> thanks for the thought -- that recipe is pretty plain, wow! and we are
> vegetarians anyway, though i understand that the flavor and mouthfeel of meat
> fats are what makes a dish work for some people
>
> we had collards in green curry last nig
On Sep 4, 2011, at 12:10 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> I don't mind the cooking, & I enjoy the eating. It's washing the dishes
> that's such a pain.
>
> Don't matter what it is I'm cooking, seems like every damn dish in the house
> ends up having to be washed afterward as a result.
My Dad spent a
On 2011-09-04 08:43 , Eric Weir wrote:
Sorry bout that.
On Sep 3, 2011, at 10:11 PM, steve harley wrote:
but cooking for a really long time is not something we do much, especially
midsummer when the collards arrive from our farm share (we don't air condition
our house), so perhaps there is
On Sep 4, 2011, at 9:10 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Eric Weir
>> Sorry bout that.
>>
>> On Sep 3, 2011, at 10:11 PM, steve harley wrote:
>>
>>> but cooking for a really long time is not something we do much, especially
>>> midsummer when the collards arrive from our farm share (we don't ai
From: Eric Weir
Sorry bout that.
On Sep 3, 2011, at 10:11 PM, steve harley wrote:
but cooking for a really long time is not something we do much, especially
midsummer when the collards arrive from our farm share (we don't air condition
our house), so perhaps there is something about collards
Sorry bout that.
On Sep 3, 2011, at 10:11 PM, steve harley wrote:
> but cooking for a really long time is not something we do much, especially
> midsummer when the collards arrive from our farm share (we don't air
> condition our house), so perhaps there is something about collards we've
> mi
On 2011-03-10 19:06 , Rob Studdert wrote:
On 10 March 2011 07:42, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-03-09 11:19 , Eric Weir wrote:
And getting a Unix install up and running vs. getting a Mac up and running
-- no comparison. Mac wins hands-down, even over Ubuntu.
it's an absolute cinch to get Ubun
On 10 March 2011 07:42, steve harley wrote:
> On 2011-03-09 11:19 , Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> And getting a Unix install up and running vs. getting a Mac up and running
>> -- no comparison. Mac wins hands-down, even over Ubuntu.
>
> it's an absolute cinch to get Ubuntu up and running in a virtual mac
On 2011-03-09 11:19 , Eric Weir wrote:
And getting a Unix install up and running vs. getting a Mac up and running --
no comparison. Mac wins hands-down, even over Ubuntu.
it's an absolute cinch to get Ubuntu up and running in a virtual machine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
I don't know if HAL IBM is actually a coincidence. IIRC, Clark in an
interview once made the statement that he and Kubrick made a conscious
decision to use HAL for just that reason.
On 3/9/2011 1:59 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 06:32:52PM +0100, AlunFoto wrote:
2011/3/9 Jo
> >> > In case you didn't realize this, Macs run Unix.
> >>
> >> Ah, but then again so does all current Windows incarnations. :-)
> >
> > No - Windows NT and later boxes run VMS.
>
> Thanks, John. What I didn't know, as I checked it out now, was that
> VMS and UNIX has no common roots.
>
you can
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 06:32:52PM +0100, AlunFoto wrote:
> 2011/3/9 John Francis :
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:54:43PM +0100, AlunFoto wrote:
> >> 2011/3/9 Larry Colen :
> >> > In case you didn't realize this, Macs run Unix.
> >>
> >> Ah, but then again so does all current Windows incarnations.
On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> I spent a whole year trying to transition into Unix before I finally threw
>> in the towel and bought a Mac.
>
> In case you didn't realize this, Macs run Unix.
And getting a Unix install up and running vs. getting a Mac up and running --
no c
On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> In case you didn't realize this, Macs run Unix
I do realize that. I was referring to my experience with Unix prior to OS X.
--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
eew.
2011/3/9 John Francis :
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:54:43PM +0100, AlunFoto wrote:
>> 2011/3/9 Larry Colen :
>> > In case you didn't realize this, Macs run Unix.
>>
>> Ah, but then again so does all current Windows incarnations. :-)
>
> No - Windows NT and later boxes run VMS.
Thanks, John. What
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:54:43PM +0100, AlunFoto wrote:
> 2011/3/9 Larry Colen :
> > In case you didn't realize this, Macs run Unix.
>
> Ah, but then again so does all current Windows incarnations. :-)
No - Windows NT and later boxes run VMS.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
2011/3/9 Larry Colen :
> In case you didn't realize this, Macs run Unix.
Ah, but then again so does all current Windows incarnations. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm
On Mar 6, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2011, at 3:43 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>
>> On 05/03/2011 22:25, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>> mike wilson wrote:
>>>
Do you use google mail, by any chance?
>>>
>>> You don't use Google mail - it uses YOU!
>>
>> I'm still hoping for tot
On 06/03/2011 17:34, P. J. Alling wrote:
Apple still uses you it's just gentler about it.
You must have a silencer on your wallet.
On 3/6/2011 10:29 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Mar 5, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Do you use google mail, by any chance?
You don't
Yeah, I thought about that as I was composing the response. The difference, for
me anyway, is that even though the Mac is pretty locked-down, too --not really,
though -- the Apple people seem to understand human beings better, to know what
they're looking for, what will work for them. Everythin
Apple still uses you it's just gentler about it.
On 3/6/2011 10:29 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Mar 5, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Do you use google mail, by any chance?
You don't use Google mail - it uses YOU!
That was my complaint about Windows. Don't have that co
On Mar 5, 2011, at 3:43 PM, mike wilson wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 22:25, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> mike wilson wrote:
>>
>>> Do you use google mail, by any chance?
>>
>> You don't use Google mail - it uses YOU!
>
> I'm still hoping for total annihilation of MS, Google and Adobe when the
> battle fo
On Mar 5, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> mike wilson wrote:
>
>> Do you use google mail, by any chance?
>
> You don't use Google mail - it uses YOU!
That was my complaint about Windows. Don't have that complaint anymore.
---
On Mar 5, 2011, at 3:15 PM, mike wilson wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 16:29, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> After reading Jostein's response to Mike I realized I shoulda been writing
>> to Mike! My apologies, Mike! Thank *you* for the very clear explanation.
>
> Er, no. You were right the first time - I jus
On 06/03/2011 00:46, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Resistance is futile.
I do it purely for contrary SOB reasons, so it is also intensely satisfying.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:43 PM, mike wilson wrote:
On 05/03/2011 22:25, Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Do you use google mail, by any
Resistance is futile.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:43 PM, mike wilson wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 22:25, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> mike wilson wrote:
>>
>>> Do you use google mail, by any chance?
>>
>> You don't use Google mail - it uses YOU!
>
> I'm still hoping for total annihilation of MS, Google and A
I use Firefox, Google is only the back end, I've set it up to be as
unobtrusive as possible, and instituted a number of filters on both
Firefox and Google to make it mimic a real e-mail system. Google is
still probably using me, but I hardly notice.
On 3/5/2011 4:25 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
m
On 05/03/2011 22:25, Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Do you use google mail, by any chance?
You don't use Google mail - it uses YOU!
I'm still hoping for total annihilation of MS, Google and Adobe when the
battle for omniscience kicks off. With a side order of Apple obliteration.
mike wilson wrote:
>Do you use google mail, by any chance?
You don't use Google mail - it uses YOU!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On 04/03/2011 16:29, Eric Weir wrote:
After reading Jostein's response to Mike I realized I shoulda been writing to
Mike! My apologies, Mike! Thank *you* for the very clear explanation.
Er, no. You were right the first time - I just clarified a small
technical point. Do you use google mail
After reading Jostein's response to Mike I realized I shoulda been writing to
Mike! My apologies, Mike! Thank *you* for the very clear explanation.
On Mar 4, 2011, at 2:13 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
> I find that the only way to achieve accurate focus is to home in on
> the subject with fully open ap
On 22/2/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>, I think i may have dodged a bullet
Jees this is not a safe place to be right now - there's bullets flying
everywhere!!
Interesting account. In future, you might find a nice dark wood desks/
shelving arrangements with large learned books as
A friend needed a photo of herself to use in a yellow pages ad, and possibly
for her website. She ended up paying me on the high end of what I'd charge a
stranger, so I had no problem with setting up a second photo shoot to get a
better photo for her website. Since she's a lawyer, I asked if w
Big Thanks, Paul!
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/12/11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> From: Paul Stenquist
> Subject: Re: PESO: Wing Shot OOPS!
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 1:48 PM
> Very nice for a heavy crop. Good
> catch!
> Paul
>
Very nice for a heavy crop. Good catch!
Paul
On Feb 12, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> --- On Sat, 2/12/11, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>> From: Jack Davis
>> Subject: PESO: Wing Shot
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 12:07 PM
>> DA 55~300@300mm. Heav
Well OK, if you insist. Thanks for the unneeded encouragement, Bob! ;)
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/12/11, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> From: Bob Sullivan
> Subject: Re: Fw: PESO: Wing Shot OOPS!
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 1:39 PM
> Anoth
Another great shot Jack! Keep it up.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> --- On Sat, 2/12/11, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>> From: Jack Davis
>> Subject: PESO: Wing Shot
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 12:07 PM
>> DA 55~300
--- On Sat, 2/12/11, Jack Davis wrote:
> From: Jack Davis
> Subject: PESO: Wing Shot
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 12:07 PM
> DA 55~300@300mm. Heavy crop. I notice
> that lightening the under wing and body shadows allowed a
> little haloing on the top o
I like the 1st one, Dave. Ignore my previous comment. I got my Dave's and
Dan's and birds mixed up. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "David Mann"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 11:17 PM
Subject: mini-GESO: Swimming Fantail
We have a
From: mike wilson
On 14 January 2011 19:26, John Sessoms wrote:
> Status update:
>
>
> I still have to figure out what I'm going to do about the fragile power
> supply on this system.
Hopefully not teaching you to suck eggs but take all claims of power
rating for supplies with a pinch of salt
On 14 January 2011 19:26, John Sessoms wrote:
> Status update:
>
>
> I still have to figure out what I'm going to do about the fragile power
> supply on this system.
Hopefully not teaching you to suck eggs but take all claims of power
rating for supplies with a pinch of salt unless they include a
Status update:
I previously had Microsoft Office 98 and Photoshop CS & CS2 installed on
this system. I uninstalled them to recover the space for newer programs.
The only problem uninstalling is MS Office prompts for the installation
disk - can't uninstall without the installation disk (which
ch may get filled with an ESATA controller.
So this one may get relegated again soon anyway (soon == within another
year). Well, it seemed like a good idea at the time.
Meanwhile ... "The big OOPS!"
I had Netscape 7.2 installed on this thing when I was using
itpreviously. Downloaded and
Oops, that's what happens when I post after a late night of partying, sent it
to the wrong list. sorry
On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> A few people asked about blues dancing. The big weekly dance is Friday Night
> Blues http://fridaynightblues.com
>
> Th
I believe it is the Winehouse era aka the beehive era aka the 50?
Cheers
Ecke
2010/7/11 Ann Sanfedele :
>
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>> another pair of snaps from my non-camera... with your choice of tiny url
>> or straight from the gate links
>> for each
>>
>> How hot was it???
>>
>> http://tinyu
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
another pair of snaps from my non-camera... with your choice of tiny
url or straight from the gate links
for each
How hot was it???
http://tinyurl.com/2vjdgzv
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/cell-phone-snaps/12420035_MC2ch/1/930797176_cEirN/Medium
Hmmm...luckily not the picture the title conjured up in my mind ;-)
Unfortunately the background draws my eyes away from the collection of
leaves. I think that wouldn't happen if the background were all the
mottled tan without the line of blue tiles. I like the way you can see
the stress
Sorry, forgot to use the right link.
http://i896.photobucket.com/albums/ac164/gelewis_2010/Pentax/HotTubFloaters_4697A1.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follo
From: "P. J. Alling"
It's reputed that these people can get one for you. You'll have to
e-mail them a request since it's not an item they regularly have
listed. But they do have a convenient form. I've never used them, but
Mike Johnston at TOP, (be sure to send him lots of photos of kittens
It's reputed that these people can get one for you. You'll have to
e-mail them a request since it's not an item they regularly have
listed. But they do have a convenient form. I've never used them, but
Mike Johnston at TOP, (be sure to send him lots of photos of kittens and
flowers), says t
Oh WOW! I want one!
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:33 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Who says it's not available in Hot Pink.
>
> Straight from the Pentax Japan web site.*
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/lookhere/hotpinkkx.html
>
> *If you really want one, I'll post the url of the people who'll import
On 3/29/2010 5:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
"P. J. Alling" wrote:
Who says it's not available in Hot Pink.
Straight from the Pentax Japan web site.*
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/lookhere/hotpinkkx.html
*If you really want one, I'll post the url of the people who'll import
them for y
"P. J. Alling" wrote:
> Who says it's not available in Hot Pink.
>
> Straight from the Pentax Japan web site.*
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/lookhere/hotpinkkx.html
>
> *If you really want one, I'll post the url of the people who'll import
> them for you.
I walked into a shop and
Who says it's not available in Hot Pink.
Straight from the Pentax Japan web site.*
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/lookhere/hotpinkkx.html
*If you really want one, I'll post the url of the people who'll import
them for you.
On 3/28/2010 1:21 PM, mike wilson wrote:
http://www.mikeawilson.co.
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Oops
Mike, get an up-to-date copy of the standalone Adobe Raw Converter.
Pentax changed an identification string in PEF back around the time of
the K100D Super which broke ACR recognition of PEF. Adobe update
Shoot DNG RAW and you can convert in PSCS2.
Paul
On Mar 28, 2010, at 2:42 PM, mike wilson wrote:
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> mike wilson wrote:
>>> http://www.mikeawilson.co.uk/oops.jpg
>>>
>>> Sorry, this is 1.7meg. KX files do not seem to be openable in CS2 and I
>>> had to use the Pentax sof
Bruce Walker wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
http://www.mikeawilson.co.uk/oops.jpg
Sorry, this is 1.7meg. KX files do not seem to be openable in CS2 and
I had to use the Pentax software - this is the smallest file (and it's
cropped) it does. Why are the new pef files different?
Mike, get an
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
