5 years and 21,000. Love it.
Rick
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 18:49 Brian Walters wrote:
> Maybe I got a good one as well - never any problems with it. Admittedly
> it's
> only had fairly light use (shutter count less than 1 in 6 years).
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++
Maybe I got a good one as well - never any problems with it. Admittedly it's
only had fairly light use (shutter count less than 1 in 6 years).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
> On 03 June 2018 at
I'm still carrying my K5 after has been
since I bought it when it first came out. Wish I had a memory again...(?)
Only difference is it's a back up in
case?? Have used it a few times in
both single frame and burst mode.
Image quality still surprises me.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2018, at
Bill wrote:
"I'm not sure if they got everything fixed on the K5 during it's run, but in
addition to the AF issues, they had problems with spots of cement on the sensor
on early ones and buttons falling off. Apparently if you got a good one, they
were very good indeed. I wasn't so lucky."
I gu
Congratulations to Grace!
We all watched her grow up, and loved every image of it!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I have a good K5. Excellent high ISO. Autofocus was as good as my K7.
> Grace uses the K7 now
Yes, and I didn't realize how
contentedly.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:48 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
>> Thanks, Bill!
>
> I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good for m
I have a good K5. Excellent high ISO. Autofocus was as good as my K7. Grace
uses the K7 now. (She graduated from 8th grade today!)
Paul
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
>> I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic problems.
On 6/1/2018 1:26 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for
web postings.
Pentax has always taken it up the bum for having crappy video. It's
always been OK for me,
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for web
postings.
jco
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 13:46:11 -0400, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
IS
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic problems. Can't imagine why your
AF was so ba
On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good for
me. It ended up being a far better camera than the K5 in my hands as I
got a Friday afternoon K5 that had pretty much every
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
>> resisted.
>
> To me, it had the best colour of any
At 11:23 AM 6/1/2018, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
The K-70 does not - it can use only the Pentax D-LI109 7.4 volt
lithium ion battery. I have seen no external supply options for the
K-70, and none are shown on the Ricoh site.
Do all pen
On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
To me, it had the best colour of any Pentax DSLR, but it was really only
good at base ISO. It used an updated from the K20 Samsung sensor. Great
at base ISO, but it went to hell in a hurry as the ISO was
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> K20D, then the K7, then the
On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
K20D, then the K7, then the K5.
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
Yes, but you have to buy the external battery grip and be prepared for
really c
K20D ?
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
>
> Do all pentax Dslrs have interchangable
what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
Do all pentax Dslrs have interchangable focus screens?
--
J.C. O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
Using Opera
Congratulations Jos. A fine job...
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Jos de Fotograaf
wrote:
>
> Introduction:
> My Metz 58AF-1 got defective zooming mechanism than I bought a Metz 58AF-2
> after 3 years the flash tube blew into peaces, I opened it to try to
> replace the tube and found out that
Introduction:
My Metz 58AF-1 got defective zooming mechanism than I bought a Metz
58AF-2 after 3 years the flash tube blew into peaces, I opened it to try
to replace the tube and found out that the tube is too small and can be
overloaded too easy. I reworked the head to fit a bigger tube, but
On 12/15/2015 8:47 AM, Alan C wrote:
Look what they're asking for older S/H Pentax DSLR's in SA.
There have been a spate of adverts in the last week. I've converted to
US$.With std. lens unless otherwise stated.
K20D 570; K200D 570; K10D (2 lens) 400; K10D 200;
K100D 500 & 280; Kx (2 lens
Look what they're asking for older S/H Pentax DSLR's in SA.
There have been a spate of adverts in the last week.
I've converted to US$.With std. lens unless otherwise stated.
K20D 570; K200D 570; K10D (2 lens) 400; K10D 200;
K100D 500 & 280; Kx (2 lens) 320; Kr 600.
Mostly more than the
Larry,
Some time ago, I was trying to find answers to similar questions.
Unfortunately, Pentax doesn't provide (at least at that point it didn't)
any specs with respect to this.
So, let me share the most essential bits of information that I was able to
find (and still remember).
First, a fe
Does anyone have any specifications for the bus speed for the SD cards
in our DSLR bodies? Under the rubric of Class 10 cards, different cards
are sold with different data rates. My recent purchases vary from 40 to
90 MbPS. The last time I bought cards, boosting speed from 40 to 80 or
90 cost
hand hold my Coolpix.
-Original Message-
>From: Stanley Halpin
>Subject: Re: New Pentax DSLR & Lenses
>
>
>On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:54 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
>> Quoting Ken Waller :
>>
>>>> While a tilt screen will be welcome to some, it intro
I can see where the tilt screen would be useful on a tripod mounted camera,
especially for low shots, I only hand hold my Coolpix.
-Original Message-
>From: Stanley Halpin
>Subject: Re: New Pentax DSLR & Lenses
>
>
>On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:54 AM, Brian Walters wrot
On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:54 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Quoting Ken Waller :
>
>>> While a tilt screen will be welcome to some, it introduces another
>>> mechanical system that can fail, and makes the camera a bit bulkier.
>>
>> I've got a tilt screen back on my Nikon Coolpix 7100 and at most it
Quoting Ken Waller :
While a tilt screen will be welcome to some, it introduces another
mechanical system that can fail, and makes the camera a bit bulkier.
I've got a tilt screen back on my Nikon Coolpix 7100 and at most it
adds a quarter to a half inch to the depth of the body. While it
Ken Waller wrote:
>> I wouldn't be surprised if it's the same tilt screen used on the new
>> Nikon D5500: http://www.nikon.com/news/2015/0106_dslr_01.htm
>
>I don't think it is Mark. Mine only tilts in the vertical plane while it
>sounds like the D5500 tilts in multiple planes.
I meant the scree
eth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: New Pentax DSLR & Lenses
Ken Waller wrote:
While a tilt screen will be welcome to some, it introduces another
mechanical system that can fail, and makes the camera a bit bulk
Brian Walters wrote:
>http://www.photographyblog.com/news/ricoh_showcases_4_dslr_products_at_ces_2015/
Apparently the bottom lens on that page is the new 70-200/2.8
full-frame lens.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.
Of Mark Roberts
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:52 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New Pentax DSLR & Lenses
John wrote:
>On 1/5/2015 6:07 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
>> Now let the gnashing of teeth begin as it's not the long anticipated
>> Full Frame DSLR t
John wrote:
>On 1/5/2015 6:07 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
>> Now let the gnashing of teeth begin as it's not the long anticipated
>> Full Frame DSLR that everyone says they want but no one will buy if it's
>> more than $1200.00.
>>
>
>I'll buy it even if it does cost more than $1200. It will just tak
On 1/5/2015 6:07 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Now let the gnashing of teeth begin as it's not the long anticipated
Full Frame DSLR that everyone says they want but no one will buy if it's
more than $1200.00.
I'll buy it even if it does cost more than $1200. It will just take me
longer to save up f
Ken Waller wrote:
>>While a tilt screen will be welcome to some, it introduces another
>>mechanical system that can fail, and makes the camera a bit bulkier.
>
>I've got a tilt screen back on my Nikon Coolpix 7100 and at most it adds a
>quarter to a half inch to the depth of the body. While it
ges I
haven't got into those situations where it is necessary.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: New Pentax DSLR & Lenses
I'll bet it is a 20mp K-50 replacement. The only question
I'll bet it is a 20mp K-50 replacement. The only question of real
interest is will it have an improved auto focus system, inherited from
the K-3 or get the K-5II AF system. Ricoh could do either. While a
tilt screen will be welcome to some, it introduces another mechanical
system that can fa
Quoting Brian Walters :
Photography Blog is reporting that Ricoh will announce a new DSLR &
lenses shortly.
http://www.photographyblog.com/news/ricoh_showcases_4_dslr_products_at_ces_2015/
The DSLR looks like a K-50 replacement with an tiltable read monitor.
That, of course, should be "re
Photography Blog is reporting that Ricoh will announce a new DSLR &
lenses shortly.
http://www.photographyblog.com/news/ricoh_showcases_4_dslr_products_at_ces_2015/
The DSLR looks like a K-50 replacement with an tiltable read monitor.
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Bria
Yes.
On 2/28/2014 10:49 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can be
used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
in us (well, actually, join
ME as I type this... as I am the founding member.) UPDATE: After less
than 48 hours the group has already attracted 42 members and 159
photos in the pool!
http://www.flickr.com/groups/Pentax-DSLR-Astrophotography/
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
Photographers must le
On 3/1/2014 11:19 AM, John wrote:
On 3/1/2014 2:53 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
On 2/28/2014 11:43 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting "J.C. O'Connell" :
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Yes - I use t
On 3/1/2014 2:53 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
On 2/28/2014 11:43 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting "J.C. O'Connell" :
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Yes - I use the same cable on DS, K200D and K-5.
On 2/28/2014 11:43 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting "J.C. O'Connell" :
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Yes - I use the same cable on DS, K200D and K-5. I assume the same
one will work on the K
Quoting "J.C. O'Connell" :
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can
be used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
Yes - I use the same cable on DS, K200D and K-5. I assume the same
one will work on the K-3.
--
Cheers
Brian
++
does anybody know if the electronic cable release for the istDS can be
used on later model
Pentax DSLRS like K10 k20 k5 k3, etc?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
Fri Jan 24 15:04:15 EST 2014
Bruce Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> >
> > Fri Jan 24 06:03:57 EST 2014
> > Steve Cottrell wrote:
> >
> >> On 23/1/14, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >>
> >> >Were it I shooting video, I'd meter the scene and se
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> Fri Jan 24 06:03:57 EST 2014
> Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
>> On 23/1/14, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>> >Were it I shooting video, I'd meter the scene and set the camera on
>> >manual at that setting. There's nothing more ann
Fri Jan 24 06:03:57 EST 2014
Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 23/1/14, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Were it I shooting video, I'd meter the scene and set the camera on
> >manual at that setting. There's nothing more annoying than having the
> >exposure changing throughout some foota
On 23/1/14, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Were it I shooting video, I'd meter the scene and set the camera on
>manual at that setting. There's nothing more annoying than having the
>exposure changing throughout some footage. That goes for WB too.
That's the way we do it. However, pan
Were it I shooting video, I'd meter the scene and set the camera on
manual at that setting. There's nothing more annoying than having the
exposure changing throughout some footage. That goes for WB too.
Unless, of course, it's just the filmic equivalent of a snapshot. Then
Auto everything and go f
Maybe this will be helpful to others:
I found that when there is a high contrast between the main
subject and the background (e.g. dark-clothed people with a white wall
in the background),
if the exposure is set to the central-point (as I frequently do when I
shoot still images) or to the focal
On 10/8/2013 3:03 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
$499 body K-500 16MP 12-bit
$569 K-50 16MP 12-bit, weather sealed
$749 K-5 II 16MP 14-bit, weather sealed, AA filter
$869 K-5 IIs 16MP 14-bit, weather sealed, No AA filter
$1299K-3 24MP 14-bit
$499 body K-500 16MP 12-bit
$569 K-50 16MP 12-bit, weather sealed
$749 K-5 II 16MP 14-bit, weather sealed, AA filter
$869 K-5 IIs 16MP 14-bit, weather sealed, No AA filter
$1299K-3 24MP 14-bit, weather sealed, No AA
filter/SR-"AA filte
Ciprian, the IR Remote Control costs just US $ 2.5 (usable on Pentax +
the Canikons + Sony, and the Cable Remote costs US $ 3.5 to 5 from
evil bay. You just have to Google.
And I am certain Romanian Customs will not charge you duty for a
"piddly" amount.
At least here in India the Post Office Custo
On 9 February 2011 01:53, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Well, I guess we're back at Rob Studdert's original lament of no GPS in a
> Pentax body. Sorry, Rob. :-)
No problem, I'm betting that integrating a real GPS module in a DSLR
would not add significantly in the cost these days and would be a far
mor
On 9 February 2011 04:19, AlunFoto wrote:
> You have 802.11n base stations? Cool. :-)
> Only up to the g spec myself yet.
>
> However I find that the throughput is far less than the theoretical
> max for the protocol. When copying files from my laptop to the PC,
> connecting through the wireless
On 2011-02-08 13:57 , Thibouille wrote:
Alright, but if said changes or access point moves or there's no
access point in sight it is useless.
in most urban locations there are multiple access points in range so
it's not too hard for Skyhook to figure out that one is no longer where
it used to
2011/2/8 Bruce Walker :
>
> Well, you've beaten me with your superior math skillz there, Jostein. :-) I
A first for me, I think. :-)
> But I still like "no wires"! :-)
It's definately less hassle. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Di
Alright, but if said changes or access point moves or there's no
access point in sight it is useless.
Le mardi 8 février 2011, John Francis a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:47:39AM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:15, Thibouille wrote:
>>
>> > Thouse from Houston won't
On 8 February 2011 17:19, AlunFoto wrote:
> It's kinda hard to catch what the guy in the video is saying, but
> my impression is that the five second uploads are from jpegs. I also
> get the impression that he change to raw files about 3 minutes into
> the video. The upload times are considerably
On 11-02-08 12:19 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
However I find that the throughput is far less than the theoretical
max for the protocol. When copying files from my laptop to the PC,
connecting through the wireless network is just not an option. _that_
speed is abysmal. :-)
Yeah, WiFi can be terrible. Bu
On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:12, John Francis wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:47:39AM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
>>
>> ..and it really only gives you the position of your access provider.
>>
>> Any "auto-locate" software which I run while at my house tells me I'm in a
>> suburb 20 miles away..
2011/2/8 Bruce Walker :
> The wires support 480Mbps, yes, but once you load up the entire USB driver
> stack the resulting actual in-use speed is much less than that. Have you
> ever timed USB2 xfers? One word for them: abysmal.
Call them what you like, Bruce... :-)
We are in agreement over the
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:47:39AM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:15, Thibouille wrote:
>
> > Thouse from Houston won't be tagged, those from Boston will tagged but how?
> > Geoloc on the net is AFAIK VERY imprecise. If it is just to get the
> > town name, not very useful, r
The Houston photos should be tagged as well. It doesn't seem like it
requires login to the wi-fi network to capture the address Eye-fi uses
to generate location data. The network's address just has to be in
Skyhook's database.
From: Thibouille
Thouse from Houston won't be tagged, those from B
On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:15, Thibouille wrote:
> Thouse from Houston won't be tagged, those from Boston will tagged but how?
> Geoloc on the net is AFAIK VERY imprecise. If it is just to get the
> town name, not very useful, really.
>
..and it really only gives you the position of your access provid
On 11-02-08 10:22 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
2011/2/8 Bruce Walker:
- WiFi is much, *much* speedier than USB
Are you sure, Bruce?
The card is specified to utilise the 802.11n WiFi standard, which
according to Wikipedia will give 100 Mbit/s. AFAIK, the USB2 supports
480 Mbit/s.
Jostein
The wires s
From: Bruce Walker
On 11-02-08 9:27 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Be aware, though, that they are battery hogs.
> Big time.
> (this from personal experience)
Can the WiFi stuff can be disabled (ie powered-off, like in an iPod
Touch) when shooting in the field where all you need is the GPS
fun
That's not really how it works. Eye-fi uses skyhook's database.
There's an explanation of how that was created here:
http://www.skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/
In Igor's example the photos would be tagged as being taken in
Houston, even though the Wi-Fi wasn't free. All eye-fi needs is the
Wi-Fi h
places the W90, most likely)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pentaximaging.com/digital-camera/Optio_WG-1_GPS_Yellow_Green/
>>>>>
>>>>> All links found via Dario's posts on Facebook
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm most
Thouse from Houston won't be tagged, those from Boston will tagged but how?
Geoloc on the net is AFAIK VERY imprecise. If it is just to get the
town name, not very useful, really.
2011/2/8 Igor Roshchin :
>
>
> 2011/2/8 Bruce Walker :
>>
>> Actually, you can have that now if you pop in an Eye-Fi P
2011/2/8 Bruce Walker :
> - WiFi is much, *much* speedier than USB
Are you sure, Bruce?
The card is specified to utilise the 802.11n WiFi standard, which
according to Wikipedia will give 100 Mbit/s. AFAIK, the USB2 supports
480 Mbit/s.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto
2011/2/8 Bruce Walker :
>
> Actually, you can have that now if you pop in an Eye-Fi Pro X2 8GB
> SDHC
> card. Has a built-in GPS, as well as the WiFi that is its primary
> function.
> Street price about $120.
> http://www.eye.fi/products/prox2
>
> I'm considering one because it can be used in a w
On 11-02-08 9:37 AM, Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 8 February 2011 14:33, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-02-08 9:27 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Be aware, though, that they are battery hogs.
Big time.
(this from personal experience)
Can the WiFi stuff can be disabled (ie powered-off, like in an iPo
On 8 February 2011 14:33, Bruce Walker wrote:
> On 11-02-08 9:27 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>>
>> Be aware, though, that they are battery hogs.
>> Big time.
>> (this from personal experience)
>
> Can the WiFi stuff can be disabled (ie powered-off, like in an iPod Touch)
> when shooting in the f
February 8, 2011 08:49 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: GPS in Pentax DSLR [Re: New Pentax Stuff Announced (nothing major)]
On 11-02-08 6:42 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 8 February 2011 09:54, John Celio wrote:
Optio WG-1 (replaces the W90, most likely)
http://www.pentaximagin
links found via Dario's posts on Facebook
I'm most interested in the WG-1, myself. I've been hoping to get a
waterproof Optio for a long time. Hopefully I'll be able to do that
later this year.
It would be quite useful to have a GPS in a Pentax DSLR, I wonder how
long it will take
om: Bruce Walker [mailto:bruce.wal...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2011 08:49 AM
>To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
>Subject: GPS in Pentax DSLR [Re: New Pentax Stuff Announced (nothing major)]
>
>On 11-02-08 6:42 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
>> On 8 February 2
oof Optio for a long time. Hopefully I'll be able to do that
>>> later this year.
>>
>> It would be quite useful to have a GPS in a Pentax DSLR, I wonder how
>> long it will take.
>
> Actually, you can have that now if you pop in an Eye-Fi Pro X2 8GB SDHC
&g
-1, myself. I've been hoping to get a
waterproof Optio for a long time. Hopefully I'll be able to do that
later this year.
It would be quite useful to have a GPS in a Pentax DSLR, I wonder how
long it will take.
Actually, you can have that now if you pop in an Eye-Fi Pro X2 8GB SDHC
card
Very interesting stuff, John. Thanks.
I'll keep the subject posted with anything new I can get.
2010/11/1 John Sessoms :
> From: Thibouille
>>
>> Thanks John.
>> It behaves like I thought it would. What I thought about is the following:
>> Use a non P-TTL flash as a 240FT set to 2nd curtain. It sh
From: Thibouille
Thanks John.
It behaves like I thought it would. What I thought about is the following:
Use a non P-TTL flash as a 240FT set to 2nd curtain. It should flash only once.
Find a way to make it of no use to the exposure but use it to trigger
other flashes with optical sensor.
In the
Thanks John.
It behaves like I thought it would. What I thought about is the following:
Use a non P-TTL flash as a 240FT set to 2nd curtain. It should flash only once.
Find a way to make it of no use to the exposure but use it to trigger
other flashes with optical sensor.
In theory, it should work
From: Thibouille
I don't think so but would a K7 sync on 2nd curtain when used with
X-sync cord (or hotshoe but not with a Pentax flash)?
Or should I trick the Studio flash with pentax flash to fire them ?
I can't test just yet and I'm curious ...
I think the K7 works the same as the K10 & K20
I don't think so but would a K7 sync on 2nd curtain when used with
X-sync cord (or hotshoe but not with a Pentax flash)?
Or should I trick the Studio flash with pentax flash to fire them ?
I can't test just yet and I'm curious ...
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Ph
- Original Message -
From: "Luiz Felipe"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
...but is it a full frame gasket??? :-)
It's a simulated gasket.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
I remember reading at the page something about North Dakota... now
that's some extension...
LF
Larry Colen escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:39:16PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
Here's one of the macro photos:
http://www.neovenator.com/2009/04/pixel-therapy.html
Shot with the K10D, Pentax Hel
...but is it a full frame gasket??? :-)
LF
Larry Colen escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
With the shipped matte screen of the K20D, I saw the image as sharp when
it (from the camera point of view) was not; it looks like if the plane
of focus was 5cm wide, I'd
resolved.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 5:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
On Wed, A
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:39:16PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
> Here's one of the macro photos:
> http://www.neovenator.com/2009/04/pixel-therapy.html
>
> Shot with the K10D, Pentax Helicoid extension tube (fully extended),
> three vivitar extension tubes (can't remember the sizes), Pentax Macro
> B
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
> With the shipped matte screen of the K20D, I saw the image as sharp when
> it (from the camera point of view) was not; it looks like if the plane
> of focus was 5cm wide, I'd see the image as sharp over between 20cm and
> 50cm (depending o
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Miserere wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out if we're still talking about the new camera
> or if it's about AF vs MF and matte vs split-prism.
Hey, this is PDML.
We could be talking about all of those things at once.
Or none of those things.
cheers,
frank
--
I'm trying to figure out if we're still talking about the new camera
or if it's about AF vs MF and matte vs split-prism.
In any case, and seeing as you all asked, I would like a matte screen
with a central micro-prism--no split prism for me, thank you.
Basically, I'd like an SA-23 from the LX era:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Graydon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:20:23AM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
>> >> EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep th
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:20:23AM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
> >> EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
> >> Lose the prism and mirror but keep the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
>> EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
>> Lose the prism and mirror but keep the camera otherwise the same??
>
> Keep the direct optical path to the vi
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:49:40AM -0400, Mark Roberts scripsit:
> Graydon wrote:
>> You know of any other plausibly-better-than-"A mid-level 4/3 or APS-C
>> DSLR of the brand of your choice" -- which is recommendation #3 --
>> that's going to be announced in a month? I'm certainly not as
>> well-
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:38:39AM -0500, Charles Robinson scripsit:
> On Apr 23, 2009, at 9:00, Graydon wrote:
>> I'm not expecting a revolution either, but, Hoya needs one, and Mike
>> Johnson deferred his camera #2 recommendation today; "This is awkward,
>> but I'm going to have to hold off with
1 - 100 of 1279 matches
Mail list logo