Well, it's not street photography 'cause there's no pavement, concrete,
buildings, the sort of things that differentiate streets from, say, beaches.
;-)
These are really nice beach and ocean photos, but I don't feel that the people
in the shots add much. They don't seem to be doing anything of
On Apr 1, 2012, at 10:18 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>
>>
>> There are several shots in here with a group of college age kids, 153-154
>> and 230-232. Shortly after shooting 154, I noticed one of them had a camera
>> and got to chatting with them. One of the girls told me he
From: Larry Colen
There are worse things than having an hour to kill, when you're two blocks from
the beach, at sunset.
I found myself taking two types of pictures, and so I split it into two sets. In these I
was practicing my "street photography", trying to capture people at the
decisive m
On 4/1/2012 3:54 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
There are worse things than having an hour to kill, when you're two blocks from
the beach, at sunset.
I found myself taking two types of pictures, and so I split it into two sets. In these I
was practicing my "street photography", trying to capture peop
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Larry Colen
> Sent: 01 April 2012 10:49
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Is it street photography, if there is no street?
>
>
> On Apr 1, 20
On Apr 1, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Bob W wrote:
> You're too far away from them (cf Bob Capa's quote). There's no sense of
> engagement or involvement in the situation.
Interesting, I was trying to have the people as elements of the photo, rather
than the subject. It sounds as if it didn't work.
Th
You're too far away from them (cf Bob Capa's quote). There's no sense of
engagement or involvement in the situation.
B
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Larry Colen
> Sent: 01 April 2012 09:54
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>
This one of mine was the winning image in the accomplished category, back in
2007.
Although its not currently up on the wall.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6060854
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Cory Waters"
Subje
>
> On 2/10/2012 14:39, Cory Waters wrote:
>>
>> Today's thread about GFM got me looking at past galleries. And it got me
>> thinking.
>> I've taken many photos on that mountain in the three or four trip up to
>> North Carolina. I'm pretty proud of some of them.
>> I only have one on my wall though
On 2/10/2012 14:39, Cory Waters wrote:
Today's thread about GFM got me looking at past galleries. And it got me
thinking.
I've taken many photos on that mountain in the three or four trip up to
North Carolina. I'm pretty proud of some of them.
I only have one on my wall though. It's the one Mar
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 08:35 -0700, "Tim Bray"
wrote:
> Ricoh has a great big honking ultra-boring
> photocopier/printer/office-widget business. Much like Canon I guess.
> Only in the case of Ricoh, it's pretty obvious that the
> office-products is at the center and the camera thing is a bag on the
Somebody here some years ago claimed that a certain brand of copier
had a Pentax 50mm inside as the taking lens.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
> Ricoh has a great big honking ultra-boring
> photocopier/printer/office-widget business. Much like Canon I guess.
>
Ricoh has a great big honking ultra-boring
photocopier/printer/office-widget business. Much like Canon I guess.
Only in the case of Ricoh, it's pretty obvious that the
office-products is at the center and the camera thing is a bag on the
side. I think adding Pentax makes all sorts of sense for th
The 645D viewfinder is brilliant.
DagT
Den 2. juli 2011 kl. 02.44 skrev Steven Desjardins:
> The 645 did have an awesome viewfinder, however.
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> On 7/1/11 5:31 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> Good as my LX, Mark?
>>
>> Dunno. I've never o
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
>> The sky isn't falling.
>
> This is the PDML. The sky is _always_ falling.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly abo
oberts wrote:
>
>> From: Mark Roberts
>> Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Friday, July 1, 2011, 5:03 PM
>> On 7/1/11 5:31 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>> Good as my LX, Mark?
>>
>>
I've never owned an A850 or 645, but have absolutely no doubt that would be
true.
I'd suspect that any 12MP or larger sensor would approach or exceed the image
quality of the 645.
Jack
--- On Fri, 7/1/11, Mark Roberts wrote:
> From: Mark Roberts
> Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Goi
The 645 did have an awesome viewfinder, however.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> On 7/1/11 5:31 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> Good as my LX, Mark?
>
> Dunno. I've never owned an LX. But the image quality of the 25-megapixel
> Sony is better than my old Pentax 645.
>
>
> --
> P
The 35 macro is in my b&h wish list as well. Cheers. Christine
On Jul 1, 2011, at 7:11 PM, William Robb wrote:
> On 01/07/2011 5:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> Until a couple of hours ago he didn't but he had posted a bunch of photos
>> taken with the DA35 macro. The bastard. That lens has
On 01/07/2011 5:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Until a couple of hours ago he didn't but he had posted a bunch of photos taken
with the DA35 macro. The bastard. That lens has been on my wishlist for a
couple of years now
Yeah, it's a nice lens. I like the pictures from the 31 more, but I like
On 7/1/11 5:31 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Good as my LX, Mark?
Dunno. I've never owned an LX. But the image quality of the 25-megapixel
Sony is better than my old Pentax 645.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDM
On 2 July 2011 04:30, Mark Roberts wrote:
> William Robb wrote:
>
>>On 01/07/2011 12:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>> Anyone seen a decent electronically produced image in a mirrorless
>>> viewfinder?
>>
>>Nope, they still Hoover. I was so attracted to that little Fuji
>>rangefinder until I turned on
I went over to Ned's blog to see if he had anything to say about the
acquisition. Until a couple of hours ago he didn't but he had posted a bunch of
photos taken with the DA35 macro. The bastard. That lens has been on my
wishlist for a couple of years now, ever since I started going on photo w
On Jul 1, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Morris Galloway wrote:
> Hoya is keeping the Pentax Medical Division: they feel it really delivers in
> the end.
Mark!
>
> G. Back to lurking.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIB
Yeah, but now they'll be the butt of all these jokes.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Morris Galloway
wrote:
> Hoya is keeping the Pentax Medical Division: they feel it really delivers in
> the end.
>
> G. Back to lurking.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/
Hoya is keeping the Pentax Medical Division: they feel it really
delivers in the end.
G. Back to lurking.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 2011-07-01 05:27 , Steven Desjardins wrote:
How big is Ricoh as a
company?
$25 billion revenue last fiscal year
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the di
On 7/1/2011 4:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
On 01/07/2011 12:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Anyone seen a decent electronically produced image in a mirrorless viewfinder?
Nope, they still Hoover. I was so attracted to that little Fuji
rangefinder until I turned on the electronic vi
Good as my LX, Mark?
Jack
--- On Fri, 7/1/11, Mark Roberts wrote:
> From: Mark Roberts
> Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, July 1, 2011, 1:30 PM
> William Robb wrote:
>
> >On 01/07/2011 12:39
William Robb wrote:
>On 01/07/2011 12:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Anyone seen a decent electronically produced image in a mirrorless
>> viewfinder?
>
>Nope, they still Hoover. I was so attracted to that little Fuji
>rangefinder until I turned on the electronic viewfinder.
Know what's *really* g
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Bob W wrote:
> EVFs will get better as long as early adopters continue to fund the
> research. It's no different to anything else, like sensors and so on, that
> were crap to start with, but have continued to improve. EVFs however have a
> long way to go in my opini
> On 01/07/2011 12:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> > Anyone seen a decent electronically produced image in a mirrorless
> viewfinder?
>
> Nope, they still Hoover. I was so attracted to that little Fuji
> rangefinder until I turned on the electronic viewfinder.
>
> William Robb
EVFs will get better as
On 01/07/2011 12:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Anyone seen a decent electronically produced image in a mirrorless viewfinder?
Nope, they still Hoover. I was so attracted to that little Fuji
rangefinder until I turned on the electronic viewfinder.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
rom: Jack Davis
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:39:20
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
Anyone seen a decent electronically produced image in a mirrorless viewfinder?
Jack
--- On Fri,
Anyone seen a decent electronically produced image in a mirrorless viewfinder?
Jack
--- On Fri, 7/1/11, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> From: Steven Desjardins
> Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, July 1
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> It will be very interesting to see where this goes. I do hope it's a
>> positive for everyone ... including the medical products market!
>
> And if it isn't, I can pull a Godfrey and switch to Nikon, or whatever system
> catches my fancy. ..
On 7/1/2011 1:20 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 01/07/2011 11:18 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Oh, I fully expect to be rewarded with humiliation
You haven't bought much gear lately, have you
Actually not, I have budgetary issues, I bought the K20D almost two
years ago, my last major pur
I'm somewhat hopeful about this. The traditional digital market
(How's that, huh) of P&S and DSLRs is being eroded in two ways:
cellphones will increasingly replace the P&S and mirrorless will cut
into the DSLRs. Ricoh and Pentax could make a pretty good mirrorless
body with Pentax optics.
--
P
- Original Message -
From: "Miserere"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
On 1 July 2011 12:04, Thib wrote:
I agree with Bill. Not only is ricoh a better fit, Ricoh is a genera
Wow! Wow! Wow! Sure hope this works out for everyone! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Miserere"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:35 AM
Subject: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
I'm not even joking!
http://www.1001noisycameras.com/
On Jul 1, 2011, at 7:00 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Paul Stenquist
> wrote:
>>> Seems to be a done deal by the Hoya press release. I just hope it's
>>> not bad news for Ricoh owners. That would be an annoyance.
>>
>> It would be a much bigger annoyance in thes
Ah, Bill, you silver tongued devil. I'll never drop another bar of
soap without thinking of you. OTOH . . .
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:07 PM, William Robb
wrote:
> On 01/07/2011 10:33 AM, Miserere wrote:
>>
>> On 1 July 2011 12:04, Thib wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree with Bill. Not only is ricoh a bett
Unlike Pentaxians, who hold on to their pesos like they're a zombie antidote.
Must eat brains . . .
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Miserere wrote:
> On 1 July 2011 12:04, Thib wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Bill. Not only is ricoh a better fit, Ricoh is a general tech
>> company with money to bu
On 01/07/2011 11:18 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Oh, I fully expect to be rewarded with humiliation
You haven't bought much gear lately, have you
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDM
On 7/1/2011 1:07 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 01/07/2011 10:33 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 1 July 2011 12:04, Thib wrote:
I agree with Bill. Not only is ricoh a better fit, Ricoh is a
general tech company with money to burn.
Unlike Pentaxians, who hold on to their pesos like they're a zombie
ant
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:58:28AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
> It probably means both that we'll see a Q-mount module for the GXR and
> that we won't see a Pentax APS-C mirrorless camera.
>
> -Adam
I wouldn't expect to see any short-term changes to Pentax's plans.
If, as has been assumed, the mirro
On 01/07/2011 10:33 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 1 July 2011 12:04, Thib wrote:
I agree with Bill. Not only is ricoh a better fit, Ricoh is a general tech
company with money to burn.
Unlike Pentaxians, who hold on to their pesos like they're a zombie antidote.
Well, Hoya certainly has been cha
On 1 July 2011 12:04, Thib wrote:
>
> I agree with Bill. Not only is ricoh a better fit, Ricoh is a general tech
> company with money to burn.
Unlike Pentaxians, who hold on to their pesos like they're a zombie antidote.
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://Enticing
I agree with Bill. Not only is ricoh a better fit, Ricoh is a general tech
company with money to burn.
On photography: They also tend to concentrate on niche markets and come with
original solutions. This is very Pentax imo. And their photo business is very
complimentary with Pentax products.Wil
From: "John Celio"
Can anyone tell for certain if Hoya is keeping Pentax's medical division for
themselves? I'm pretty sure that's a big source of Pentax's revenue, and it
would really suck if they lost it.
John
Hoya is almost certainly keeping the medical division. They originally
bought Pen
It would be an annoyance if it turns out to be bad news for Pentax
owners as well.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Seems to be a done deal by the Hoya press release. I just hope it's
not bad news for Ricoh owners. That would be an annoyance.
On Thursday, June 30, 2011, P. J. Alling
wrote:
Ricoh left
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Miserere wrote:
> I'm not even joking!
>
> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax-according-to-reuters-japan-sources.html
>
> If true...wow
Dammit, I'm going to have to snip off that infernal extra pin from all
my new lenses.
--
PDML Pen
On 01/07/2011 12:45 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Ricoh left the SLR business years ago. I really hate to say this but,
this looks too much Konica buying up Minolta, and we all know how that
turned out. Minolta users were lucky that Sony was looking to enter the
DSLR market.
If Hoya wasn't big enough
Maybe we'll see a K mount module for the GRX, and won't that look silly...
On 7/1/2011 9:58 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
It probably means both that we'll see a Q-mount module for the GXR and
that we won't see a Pentax APS-C mirrorless camera.
-Adam
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Steven Desjardins w
I'm voting for Pentho, since who would want a new tax on their ric?
On 7/1/2011 7:44 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
So will the new badge be Rictax or Pentoh?
Sent from my iPod
On 2011-07-01, at 1:35 AM, Miserere wrote:
I'm not even joking!
http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pen
Suaveh...
2011/7/1 Miserere :
> I'm not even joking!
>
> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax-according-to-reuters-japan-sources.html
>
> If true...wow
>
>
> —M.
>
> \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
>
> http://EnticingTheLight.com
> A Quest for Pho
Oh Boris, I already am the prophet for a new religion. Have I never
spoken here of the Church of the Magnetic Monopole? CMM's been around
for twenty years or more, I've been evangelizing for years ... !!
]'-) LOL! or is that "Mwah Hah Hah!" ]:-)
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Boris Liberman wr
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Seems to be a done deal by the Hoya press release. I just hope it's
>> not bad news for Ricoh owners. That would be an annoyance.
>
> It would be a much bigger annoyance in these parts if it were bad news for
> Pentax owners, but I assume i
It probably means both that we'll see a Q-mount module for the GXR and
that we won't see a Pentax APS-C mirrorless camera.
-Adam
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> It does make me wonder about Pentax's EVIL/MILC/Whatever plans. I
> wonder if they will continue with the A
Ricoh did get out of the SLR business during the AF era (to some
extent, they actually continued to sell MF film SLR's until recently,
but the body was a Cosina) although they did have a longtime presence
in the high-end compact side of things with their GR compacts (which
are simply awesome). But
As long as he doesn't start a new religion and proclaims himself its
supreme prophet, I am fine with that...
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> If Godfrey won't go to Pentax
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It does make me wonder about Pentax's EVIL/MILC/Whatever plans. I
wonder if they will continue with the APS-C K mount version or combine
efforts with and produce a K mount module.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> So will the new badge be Rictax or Pentoh?
>
> Sent from my iP
So will the new badge be Rictax or Pentoh?
Sent from my iPod
On 2011-07-01, at 1:35 AM, Miserere wrote:
> I'm not even joking!
>
> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax-according-to-reuters-japan-sources.html
>
> If true...wow
>
>
>—M.
>
> \/\/o/\/\ --> ht
Well, Godfrey has made us aware of Ricoh's innovative approach to
mirrorless systems and Pentax has optical expertise. And, at least
from my POV, Pentax has a bigger reputation. How big is Ricoh as a
company? It will definitely focus Pentax on photography as long as
the combination has enough bu
Does this mean the K-r & K-5 would look like this...?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/5163816994/
Heh :)
I'm assuming all new lenses are going to get stuck on the AF drive too...
- Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
t
The sky isn't falling.
This is the PDML. The sky is _always_ falling.
- Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Jul 1, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Seems to be a done deal by the Hoya press release. I just hope it's
> not bad news for Ricoh owners. That would be an annoyance.
It would be a much bigger annoyance in these parts if it were bad news for
Pentax owners, but I assume it will b
On Jul 1, 2011, at 2:45 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Ricoh left the SLR business years ago. I really hate to say this but, this
> looks too much Konica buying up Minolta, and we all know how that turned out.
> Minolta users were lucky that Sony was looking to enter the DSLR market.
>
> If Hoya
I hope it's true. That would be a plus. Ricoh is better at mass marketing than
Hoya, and the Pentax and Ricoh equipment fit together nicely as a complete line.
Paul
On Jul 1, 2011, at 1:35 AM, Miserere wrote:
> I'm not even joking!
>
> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax
John Celio wrote:
>Can anyone tell for certain if Hoya is keeping Pentax's medical division for
>themselves?
Damn - there go the Pentax endoscope jokes...
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
And through no effort on my part. :-)
On Friday, July 1, 2011, DagT wrote:
>
> Ha, Godfrey is going to be a Pentaxian again :-)
>
> http://www.ricoh.com/release/2011/0701_1.html
>
> "On completion of the Acquisition, Ricoh will begin to use the PENTAX brand
> name for some of its digital camera
Ha, Godfrey is going to be a Pentaxian again :-)
http://www.ricoh.com/release/2011/0701_1.html
"On completion of the Acquisition, Ricoh will begin to use the PENTAX brand
name for some of its digital camera products,"
DagT
>Does this mean the K-r & K-5 would look like this...?
>
>http://www.f
Does this mean the K-r & K-5 would look like this...?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/5163816994/
:-)
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Miserere wrote:
> I'm not even joking!
>
> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax-according-to-reuters-japan-sources.html
>
> If tr
t; -Original Message- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:23 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
>
> Seems to be a done deal by the Hoya press release. I just hope it's
> not bad news for Ricoh owner
ent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:23 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax
Seems to be a done deal by the Hoya press release. I just hope it's
not bad news for Ricoh owners. That would be an annoyance.
On Thursday, June 30, 2011, P. J. Alling wrote:
Ri
Seems to be a done deal by the Hoya press release. I just hope it's
not bad news for Ricoh owners. That would be an annoyance.
On Thursday, June 30, 2011, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Ricoh left the SLR business years ago. I really hate to say this but, this
> looks too much Konica buying up Minolta,
Ricoh left the SLR business years ago. I really hate to say this but,
this looks too much Konica buying up Minolta, and we all know how that
turned out. Minolta users were lucky that Sony was looking to enter the
DSLR market.
If Hoya wasn't big enough to keep Pentax a going concern, how the
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 01:35:02AM -0400, Miserere wrote:
> I'm not even joking!
>
> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax-according-to-reuters-japan-sources.html
>
> If true...wow
I assume this is good news for Pentax users?
Ricoh probably care a bit more about camera
On Thursday, June 30, 2011, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Miserere wrote:
>
>> I'm not even joking!
>>
>> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax-according-to-reuters-japan-sources.html
>>
>> If true...wow
>
> If Godfrey won't go to Pentax
LOL!!
On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Miserere wrote:
> I'm not even joking!
>
> http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2011/06/ricoh-buying-pentax-according-to-reuters-japan-sources.html
>
> If true...wow
If Godfrey won't go to Pentax
>
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PD
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> Questions like this make me want to bang my head against my keyboard.
>> In a K-x discussion group, no less.
>> Maybe I need to switch to decaf.
>> http://www.flickr.com/groups/kx/discuss
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Questions like this make me want to bang my head against my keyboard.
> In a K-x discussion group, no less.
> Maybe I need to switch to decaf.
> http://www.flickr.com/groups/kx/discuss/72157626010685493/
What's odd is that the guy asking the q
I couldn't help myself and posted a reply. I hope they never find out
I don't own a K-x!
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 30 March 2011 17:58, Darren Addy wrote:
> Questions like this make me
Actually, i find my Pentax Dslr shots have more exciting colour than
my Nikons. Some one a long time ago mentioned the Nikon are geared
toward Kodak film, browns and reds were as Pentax went with a Fuji
film, greens and blues.
Not sure if that has any truth to it, but it looks that way to me. I
fi
Darren,
Why are you reading that group?
You need tips from the blind guys??!
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Questions like this make me want to bang my head against my keyboard.
> In a K-x discussion group, no less.
> Maybe I need to switch to decaf.
> http
mike wilson wrote:
On 11/03/2011 03:29, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Modern lithium batteries don't have to be fully charged or fully
discharged. I've abused them in every way possible with no noticeable
negative effect.
PDML unintentional (?) pun of the year contender.
works for me
ann
It's my job to pass along useless and/or misinformation, Paul. I've become most
adept at it. :O
Jack
--- On Fri, 3/11/11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> From: Paul Stenquist
> Subject: Re: Is the "full first charge" still an issue?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List&q
ould reach
> full charge. This is only on the initial charge!
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Thu, 3/10/11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> From: Paul Stenquist
>> Subject: Re: Is the "full first charge" still an issue?
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>
On 11/03/2011 03:29, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Modern lithium batteries don't have to be fully charged or fully discharged.
I've abused them in every way possible with no noticeable negative effect.
PDML unintentional (?) pun of the year contender.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
h
--- On Thu, 3/10/11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> From: Paul Stenquist
> Subject: Re: Is the "full first charge" still an issue?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, March 10, 2011, 6:29 PM
> Take it with you. Modern lithium
> batteries don't h
Take it with you. Modern lithium batteries don't have to be fully charged or
fully discharged. I've abused them in every way possible with no noticeable
negative effect.
Paul
On Mar 10, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I know that it older generation batteries needed to be fully charged th
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> On 11-03-10 9:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> I know that it older generation batteries needed to be fully charged the
>> first time that they were used, or they didn't work at full capacity. But I
>> seem to remember someone saying something abou
On 11-03-10 9:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I know that it older generation batteries needed to be fully charged the first
time that they were used, or they didn't work at full capacity. But I seem to
remember someone saying something about that no longer being true. I've got to
head out before t
I read somewhere, don't remember where, that none of the Pentax DSLRs do
that.
On 2/11/2011 2:15 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
K-7 and K-5 do that via HDMI output.
I haven't tried the AV output in them and other camera models, but I
think they only output the signal during playback.
Dario
-
From: Glen Berry
I was wondering if any of the Pentax DSLRs actually transmit a "Live
View" video feed through their video output connection?
The reason I'm asking, I'm trying to figure out if it's possible to
place a Pentax DSLR in a remote location (on the end of a pole, for
example) and view
K-7 and K-5 do that via HDMI output.
I haven't tried the AV output in them and other camera models, but I think
they only output the signal during playback.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Berry"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 6:43 AM
Subject:
From: Eric Weir
On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:45 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Expect that 20m viewers to drop off considerably when they start
charging.
I did last time they experimented with this. My sense is this time
it's not an experiment. Many may be in a different place about it,
but I've decided it'
From: Paul Stenquist
Most major dailies are much less profitable than they once were, and
the good papers don't answer to shareholders. For example, the
Ochs-Sulzberger family has owned The New York Times for115 years, and
there are impenetrable barriers between ad sales and editorial. There
are
From: Larry Colen
On Jan 30, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Wasn't is always? Most major papers worked on a "for profit"
basis, and went out of business when they didn't make money.
These days here are so many sources competing for your attention.
Remember yellow journalism? Sens
Perhaps. But some of the site will remain free. And I believe that in some
cases, readers will have their choice of an advertisement-free paid site or a
commercial site with ads. Survival is dependent on the revenue flow.
On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:45 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Expect that 20m viewe
301 - 400 of 1565 matches
Mail list logo
