Darren Addy wrote:
Not aftermarket. It clearly shows in the paperwork accompanying the
piece. However, I'm mystified.
Is that included paperwork an official Pentax document? No Pentax logo
or any other company name/logo. It could be a slip included by some
company doing the modification.
On 4/14/2013 3:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Darren Addy wrote:
Not aftermarket. It clearly shows in the paperwork accompanying the
piece. However, I'm mystified.
Is that included paperwork an official Pentax document? No Pentax logo
or any other company name/logo. It could be a slip included by
I did e-mail him :-)
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P.J. Alling
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 8:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Strange FA50/1,7
Why not e-mail Boz, about it, he might be interested to know about it, heck it
might
Maybe an aftermarket mod?
The user manual shows the screw, so it wasn't an after marker mod.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Strange FA50/1,7
A strange lens indeed. Focus
Comparing the image to my FA 50 f1.7 - the outer barrel appears to be
the same size but the inner barrer in the image is as far out (or
further) than mine is at the closest focusing setting. As toher's have
commented - probably modified for macro work. I hve used my M 50 f17 for
snow crystals
on 2013-04-14 19:06 Mark C wrote
I can understand why someone would want to modify it for
macro work.
indeed close focus is about the only thing i could ask to improve my A 50mm/1.7
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I don't *know* anything about it, but I'd be willing to bet money an
endoscope is involved somehow.
From: Zos Xavius
A strange lens indeed. Focus limiter? No macro? Hmmm. Might be rare,
though the box and packaging would indicate mass production. Maybe an
aftermarket mod? That would be my
I wonder if it's some kind of add-on device intended to lock the focus
in place? Maybe the instructions are for the device itself.
From: Mark Roberts
Darren Addy wrote:
Not aftermarket. It clearly shows in the paperwork accompanying the
piece. However, I'm mystified.
Is that included
John Sessoms wrote:
I don't *know* anything about it, but I'd be willing to bet money an
endoscope is involved somehow.
Well *that's* gonna make the 2013 quotations list. Taken completely
out of context, of course.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML
Yeah. It's the business end for an endoscope used on elephants and
hippopotami.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: Strange FA50/1,7
I don't *know
On Apr 14, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Yeah. It's the business end for an endoscope used on elephants and
hippopotami.
I see a new marketing slogan:
Pentax, for big assholes.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 14, 2013, at 19:14 , Mark Roberts wrote:
I don't *know* anything about it, but I'd be willing to bet money an
endoscope is involved somehow.
Well *that's* gonna make the 2013 quotations list. Taken completely
out of context, of course.
Rick - Yeah. It's the business end for an
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
May I please ask again if anyone has experienced the following: After not
using the K-5 for about a month (been giving the K20 a bit of airing) I took
a few shots with it yesterday.
Difficult to describe, but when I chimped
Jack,
Haven't seen anything like that, but the K-5 has been busy.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
May I please ask again if anyone has experienced the following: After not
using the K-5 for about a month (been giving the K20 a bit of
Thanks, Dave. Sorry it happened to you and hope it doesn't happen again..to
either of us.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: Strange Memory Card Event
Thanks, anyway, Bob. Hope it doesn't!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: Strange Memory Card Event
Jack,
Haven't seen anything like that, but the K-5 has
I haven't seen that. It almost sounds like you were looking at images
with one of those funky special-effects jpeg filters applied...? Is
it possible you had it set to apply one of those? Though I don't know
why the filtered effect would be there one minute gone the next.
Strange, for sure.
. ;-)
Thank you!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: Strange Memory Card Event
I haven't seen that. It almost sounds like you were looking at images
with one
I've never had this happen to me, Jack. Maybe the card is getting old or
something? Cheers, Christine
On Apr 2, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
May I please ask again if anyone has experienced the following: After not
using the K-5 for about a month (been giving the K20 a bit of
bug me for awhile. ;-)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Strange Memory Card Event
I've never had this happen to me, Jack. Maybe the card is getting old
On Sep 24, 2011, at 14:02, John Celio wrote:
Recently I shot a few videos of a kitten that will be coming home with me in
a month or two. When I play them on my computer, everything is fine (aside
from my lack of manual focusing ability). When I upload them to Facebook or
YouTube, there's
On 24/09/2011 1:02 PM, John Celio wrote:
Recently I shot a few videos of a kitten that will be coming home with
me in a month or two. When I play them on my computer, everything is
fine (aside from my lack of manual focusing ability). When I upload them
to Facebook or YouTube, there's a strange
On 24/9/11, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any idea why this is happening? I'm uploading the videos straight out of the
camera; would that have anything to do with it?
Hmmm, as Bill says ' or something'.
Try converting them to something different before uploading them to
Youtube. Like
The K-5 outputs video as .avi
-p
On 9/24/2011 5:17 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 24/9/11, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any idea why this is happening? I'm uploading the videos straight out of the
camera; would that have anything to do with it?
Hmmm, as Bill says ' or something'.
Try
Which .avi ?? I have dozens of .avi files stored. 10% of them Apple Quicktime
tells me are not a recognized format, so they won't play at all. I have no
clue. (MARK)
On Sep 24, 2011, at 15:36 , Paul Sorenson wrote:
The K-5 outputs video as .avi
-p
On 9/24/2011 5:17 PM, Cotty wrote:
Maybe you should take up drinking. Start with spiked prune juice and work your
way up.
--Original Message--
From: Bran Everseeking
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: strange - a bit late
Sent: Jul 7, 2011 2:41 PM
I don't
And I complained about some internet theft from 11 year old horse back riders.
:-)
Dave
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:05 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last
Den 18. nov. 2010 kl. 07.28 skrev Boris Liberman:
On 11/18/2010 4:08 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
I can't fucking believe prints have still not been returned. I'm so
sorry this has happened to you, Mark, and other folks. I'll see what I
can do in the next few days. Ugh. Despite the slow
A great compliment indeed. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: DagT li...@thrane.name
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:05 PM
Subject: Strange news...
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
Christine Aguila wrote:
- Original Message -
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central station Metro in
Oslo. It was locked behind a glass door
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
A great compliment indeed. Cheers, Christine
My Chicago print hasn't been stolen. It's just never been returned
from Chicago. Maybe that's just as big a compliment :)
I can't fucking believe prints have still not been
Christine Aguila wrote:
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
A great compliment indeed. Cheers, Christine
My Chicago print hasn't been stolen. It's just never been returned
from Chicago. Maybe that's just as big a compliment :)
I can't fucking believe prints have still not been returned.
On 11/18/2010 4:08 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
I can't fucking believe prints have still not been returned. I'm so
sorry this has happened to you, Mark, and other folks. I'll see what I
can do in the next few days. Ugh. Despite the slow return of prints, I
hope all PDMLers still feel that the
On 15 November 2010 18:05, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central station Metro in
Oslo. It was locked behind a glass
Bob Sullivan wrote:
DagT,
That's nearly as good as somebody paying full retail price for it!
Will you get a newspaper story out of it?
Regards, Bob S.
You're dead right Bob. This has already generated more discussion than
resulted from a certain print of mine being sold at the Chicago
Maybe .-)
Nice story!
Dag T
In a few years someone may come asking how much you would have sold it
for at the time.
http://visualsciencelab.blogspot.com/2010/11/sometimes-getting-photo-stolen-is.html
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:05 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had
DagT,
That's nearly as good as somebody paying full retail price for it!
Will you get a newspaper story out of it?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
Sorry to hear that. I suspect it's a da Vinci code kind of thing,
e.g., secret clue to the apocalypse, etc.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:05 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central station Metro
in
Oslo. It was locked behind a glass door but the glass was not broken so
the
thief had a key.
Congratulations!
Sent from my phone.
On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:05 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central station Metro
On 15 November 2010 18:05, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central station Metro in
Oslo. It was locked behind a glass
On Nov 15, 2010, at 17:05, DagT wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central station Metro in
Oslo. It was locked behind a glass door but the glass
In a few years someone may come asking how much you would have sold it
for at the time.
http://visualsciencelab.blogspot.com/2010/11/sometimes-getting-photo-stolen-is.html
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:05 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
On 15 November 2010 18:05, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central station Metro in
Oslo. It was locked behind a glass
Well, Dag. It is now official. You have attained the most artisan rank
on this list by having a rather large /print/ of your work being stolen.
On the serious note - I hope it really turns out to your ultimate good.
Boris
On 11/16/2010 1:05 AM, DagT wrote:
A copy of the picture I had at the
Put an ad in the same space offering to sign it for € 666.
Congrats!
Ecke
2010/11/16 DagT li...@thrane.name:
A copy of the picture I had at the exhibition in Chicago
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page11/files/page11-1008-full.html
was been stolen last week from an exhibition in the Central
Bob Sullivan wrote:
DagT,
That's nearly as good as somebody paying full retail price for it!
Will you get a newspaper story out of it?
Regards, Bob S.
You're dead right Bob. This has already generated more discussion than
resulted from a certain print of mine being sold at the Chicago
Thanks for sharing your historical expertise, Dario. That new photo
is quite clear and informative and should satisfy anyone that the lens
is not sporting its original back end. It looks to me like the lens
in its original form is fixed to the IR unit, and not meant to be
dismounted in normal
Whew! It took some googling but I finally tracked this one down. It
looks like the lens from a Pentax Nocta from 1966, which is part-way
down this page:
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
Any comments, Dario?
As rare as it must be, the starting price on this auction looks
ludicrously high.
Le 03/07/2010 10:30, Anthony Farr a écrit :
Whew! It took some googling but I finally tracked this one down. It
looks like the lens from a Pentax Nocta from 1966, which is part-way
down this page:
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
Any comments, Dario?
As rare as it must be, the starting price
The mounting the tube seems also an original.
Are you sure about that? Compare the pictures at AOHC:
http://www.aohc.it/cameras/nocta.jpg
and,
http://www.aohc.it/images/sp40.jpg
to the picture at the auction:
http://i.ebayimg.com/11/!Bw0VCdQBGk~$(KGrHqIOKioEwPgB+i)hBMKt40,WIw~~_12.JPG
You
- Original Message
From: Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, July 3, 2010 3:58:31 AM
Subject: Re: Strange Asahi NC Takumar 3,3/300mm Pentax M42 on Ebay
The mounting the tube seems also an original.
Are you sure about
How many stops is 256x?
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Brendan MacRae
brendanmacrae1...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, July 3, 2010 3:58:31 AM
Subject: Re: Strange Asahi NC
8
How many stops is 256x?
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Brendan MacRae
brendanmacrae1...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, July 3, 2010 3:58:31 AM
Subject: Re
10:30 AM
Subject: Re: Strange Asahi NC Takumar 3,3/300mm Pentax M42 on Ebay
Whew! It took some googling but I finally tracked this one down. It
looks like the lens from a Pentax Nocta from 1966, which is part-way
down this page:
http://www.aohc.it/oddse1.htm
Any comments, Dario?
As rare
In this case, I believe the IR unit usually (so to speak) seen between the
lens and the Nocta body has been replaced by a simple barrel, in order to
keep the register distance.
See this picture I've just uploaded:
www.aohc.it/images/Nocta_06.jpg
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 2010-07-03 14:01, David Parsons wrote:
How many stops is 256x?
8
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I created a little website for my virtual tours using Apple's
iWeb about two years ago. It worked well with every browser,
including Safari. I have two Macs: the laptop runs system
10.6, the desktop runs 10.5. The other day I noticed that my
iWeb-rendered website doesn't work with
On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:29 PM, Bob W wrote:
I created a little website for my virtual tours using Apple's
iWeb about two years ago. It worked well with every browser,
including Safari. I have two Macs: the laptop runs system
10.6, the desktop runs 10.5. The other day I noticed that my
On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:41 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:29 PM, Bob W wrote:
I created a little website for my virtual tours using Apple's
iWeb about two years ago. It worked well with every browser,
including Safari. I have two Macs: the laptop runs system
10.6,
On 27/01/2010, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Disclaimer: I don't really know what I'm doing here. It's possible that the
QTVR videos can be saved as mpeg or wmv. Quite likely, I suspect.
No, generally the other options are other less well known proprietary
plugins or java
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 27/01/2010, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Disclaimer: I don't really know what I'm doing here. It's possible that the
QTVR videos can be saved as mpeg or wmv. Quite likely, I suspect.
No, generally the other options are
Sorry Peter, i have never tried my 280 on the istD.
Dave
On Jan 7, 2008 11:59 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question for those still using old equipment. I had to shoot an
event a week ago and my *ist-D started acting strangely. When I mounted
a AF280 flash the camera
Hi Peter,
P. J. Alling wrote:
When I mounted
a AF280 flash the camera worked perfectly for the first few shots then
seemed to be trying to PTTL with that flash, which of course the flash
is not capable of doing. I then swapped the flash to the *ist-Ds where
it worked as advertised. I
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:06:24 -0700, Juan Buhler wrote:
I have a A35-70 3.5- 4.5 zoom and it has correct aperture values in camera.
Is the best I can do, sorry.
James
When I mount my A35-70/4 zoom on the K10D I get some strange
aperture-related behavior. The indicated apertures (lens in A, body
That sounds weird, Juan. I've only got one A series lens left but it
works perfectly on the K10D.
G
On Aug 20, 2007, at 1:12 AM, jim wrote:
When I mount my A35-70/4 zoom on the K10D I get some strange
aperture-related behavior. The indicated apertures (lens in A, body in
P) go from f8.0 to
My only A lens (400/5.6) behaves normally on the K10D. If you can get your
hands on another A lens, you can at least determine if the problem is lens or
camera related.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That sounds weird, Juan.
My few A lenses work fine to.
Sorry.
Dave
On 8/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only A lens (400/5.6) behaves normally on the K10D. If you can get your
hands on another A lens, you can at least determine if the problem is lens or
camera related.
Paul
--
I have the A 35-70/4 a DS; I tried it on a friend's K10D... seems to
work together, could not replicate your problem.
On 8/20/07, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I mount my A35-70/4 zoom on the K10D I get some strange
aperture-related behavior. The indicated apertures (lens in A,
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:06:24PM -0700, Juan Buhler wrote:
When I mount my A35-70/4 zoom on the K10D I get some strange
aperture-related behavior. The indicated apertures (lens in A, body in
P) go from f8.0 to f45. Same lens on a DS behaves correctly.
Moreover, if I set the aperture (via
Well in A mode it should read the parameters from the body *correctly*.
If then I want to override that's my problem but it should set the
parameters correctly at first.
Also, I don't see why I couldn't use A flash mode when I use anything
else than M camera mode. This si very stupid and BTW if I
Having used these flashes for quite a long time for lots of weddings,
portraits and events, I can say they work just fine. It sounds like
you are wanting the A mode to basically function like it was TTL -
basically taking any readings/changes you make on the camera and then
setting the flash to
Well the A mode as I describe works wonderfully on my Metz 40MZ2 + Z1
so I'm used to that. Once you override, then flash settings are used
of course. Anyway it doesn't work so...
That said it now seems to me it is a feature of the 360FGZ to give
access to ONLY PTTL on a camera which offers PTTL.
I get some odd behavior also with the 360FGZ on the K10D. Sometimes it
cycles between all 4 modes, sometimes only two. If the flash is set to A
or M mode with the camera off, and then the camera is turned on, it
seems to cycle through all 4 modes. But if the cmaera is turned on
first, I get
It sounds like
you are wanting the A mode to basically function like it was TTL -
basically taking any readings/changes you make on the camera and then
setting the flash to the same. So basically the only difference with
that and TTL is that the sensor is in the flash instead of the body.
Not having used a Metz, every flash I have ever used has behaved more
like the AF360FGZ. Basically because the settings were all on
mechanical switches that couldn't be set from the body. If you look
at a Pentax AF280T or AF400T, you will see this type of unit. Most
older flashes were like
I just checked the 540FGZ manual from Pentax website.
It does work the same way. And Btw, My Z1 acts like that too in HyP
mode but normal P will allow A/M modes. Go figure...
If Metz does come with a good compatible (yeah not Sigma I mean) PTTL
shoe I will go Metz way. Period.
PL Yeah indeed,
On 1/9/07, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are a couple observations since I took time to play a bit with
external flash on my K10D. I have no other flash to test to compare
results.
Thibouille, I have the same setup, so I'll follow along here.
* Mode selection on the flash itself
* Mode selection on the flash itself is screwed up. Basicaly, except
in M mode, I can only choose P-TTL or SB (AF assist only). Not having
TTL is of course normal but I cannot access A mode nor M mode which is
weird to say the least. Pushing mode button will cycle between PTTL
and SB ,
HmmmI just put one of my AF360FGZ flashes on my K10D and was able
to cycle between P-TTL, A, M and SB. The lens in place was the DA
16-45/4.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, January 9, 2007, 11:37:02 AM, you wrote:
T Here are a couple observations since I took time to play a bit with
T
Very weird.
I can confirm that even with fresh batteries (alkaline but well they
provide 1.5V each and were perfectly new one) that unless in M mode
(camera) I can only choose PTTL or SB.
Also, it will not show correct parameters when in A mode (flash) and M
mode (camera). My FA50/1.4 exhibits the
After further investigation, when the camera mode is manual, it cycles
between the mentioned modes, but if the camera is switched out of
manual, then the flash will only cycle between P-TTL and SB just like
yours.
My woops - I almost always shoot in manual mode, so didn't try it the
other way.
My understanding and usage of A mode is that there is a sensor on the
flash that is used instead of the one in the body. The flash can be
set to any parameters that you want, independent of the body. This
allows you to control the flash as you want. It lets you do fill
flash by telling the
Very strange! I will test that with my 40MZ2.
What SCA adapter do you use ?
I use 3701.
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sorry - I seem to have had the red eye recudtion on by mistake :-(.
Anyway, the shots turned out fine :-)
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
:) Well maybe red eye reduction does improve flash accuracy then?
It would be funny lol
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yes, you're right. I hadn't looked at the bid history. The one bidder
I have left supposedly canceled a second bid as well. Hopefully, I'll
get some new bidders before this closes later today.
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Peter Loveday wrote:
If you look in the bid history you'll see that
If you look in the bid history you'll see that loads of people have
cancelled their bids, all within seconds of each other.
Looks dodgey to me.
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:00:56 -0700
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, you're right. I hadn't looked at the bid history. The one bidder
I have left supposedly canceled a second bid as well. Hopefully, I'll
get some new bidders before this closes later today.
Paul
I was not able to find your auction
Sorry, the auctin is here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=008item=180020779578rd=1sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AITrd=1
-- Original message --
From: Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:00:56 -0700
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, you're
I listed it on ebay US. It may appear in both places. I don't know. I've had a
couple more bids, so I guess I'll let it run its course.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why are you listed on ebay UK?
Four bid retractions on a
Why are you listed on ebay UK?
Four bid retractions on a single auction seems odd to me.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, the auctin is here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=008item=180020779578rd=1;
sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AITrd=1
--
PDML
Probably one or several bid cancellations!
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Paul
Stenquist
Sendt: 28. august 2006 12:12
Til: Pentax-Discuss
THIS is a bad dog: he was gnawing on a human corpse when I startled him.
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/the-long-road-ahead.htm
Cheers,
David
Joseph Tainter wrote:
I meant to send this to the list. Mind not working this morning.
Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fw:
: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
Anyone got any ideas how long was the lens used for this shot?
And what the heck is it?
From:
Subject: Re: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
http://michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/roadahead/lg/12lg.jpg
William Robb
in Afghanistan...
Anyone got any ideas how long was the lens used for this shot?
And what the heck is it?
From:
Subject: Re: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
http://michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/roadahead/lg/12lg.jpg
William Robb
--
Dr E D F Williams
I thought it was Hillary Clinton, but I guess I was wrong.
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:41:56 +0100
I'd say it was a pariah dog, which
I thought it was Hillary Clinton but I guess I was wrong.
Tom C.
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:09:59 +0300
Are those ears natural? Have they been
Tom C wrote:
I thought it was Hillary Clinton but I guess I was wrong.
Tom C.
The mistake was an honest one, Tom. The resemblance is extraordinary!
keith
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Strange looking dog in Afghanistan...
I thought it was Hillary Clinton but I guess I was wrong.
The ears are wrong.
William Robb
101 - 200 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
