- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sorry guys.
==
I got none. I think, William, they only show up in the box of the
subscriber
who has bounced.
Sorry for wasting bandwidth on nothing then.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
In a message dated 2/12/2007 2:41:40 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you got this post twice I am sorry. I posted it early this morning and
it never showed up in my inbox or my outbox.
Sandy
Definitely better. I think you can keep exploring it, though
of the pictures I took there on my blog. IF you are interested please take
a look.
http://blubicon.blogspot.com/
If you got this post twice I am sorry. I posted it early this morning and
it never showed up in my inbox or my outbox.
Sandy
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
are interested please take
a look.
http://blubicon.blogspot.com/
If you got this post twice I am sorry. I posted it early this morning and
it never showed up in my inbox or my outbox.
Sandy
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
please take
SH a look.
SH http://blubicon.blogspot.com/
SH If you got this post twice I am sorry. I posted it early this morning and
SH it never showed up in my inbox or my outbox.
SH Sandy
SH http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Good one. I like the dutch angle but agree that a tighter crop might
help.
Welcome back.
Paul
On Dec 21, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Dave,
Welcome back!!!
I like the shot too, but think it could be improved by
cropping out the half-guy on the left and some of the
pavement at the
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 21/12/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5361559
Dave Brooks, street shooter ;-) Nice pic.
Glad to read you're on the mend.
Do you seriously walk around a modern-day metropolis wearing those
Thanks Rick.
I had the 1/2 guy cropped out, but i thought it looked better with him in.
I'll have another look at it that way.
Dave
Quoting Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dave,
Welcome back!!!
I like the shot too, but think it could be improved by
cropping out the half-guy on the left
Sent: 22. desember 2006 04:06
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: A Peso and a Sorry
Christmas for the Brooks' was always a happy and fun time, even in the
lean years.
I lost my parents the last few years around this time. I want
Christmas to still be fun and happy for my family, but sometimes i
have
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5361559
Nice grab. Just remember to shake the camera a bit when you press the
shutter button and you'll get shots just like Frank!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Opps, sorry./
I had SR on for this stuff.
I'll turn it off.:-)
D
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5361559
Nice grab. Just remember to shake the camera a bit when you press the
shutter button and you'll get shots
Hi!
Dave, welcome back!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 21/12/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5361559
Dave Brooks, street shooter ;-) Nice pic.
Glad to read you're on the mend.
Do you seriously walk around a modern-day metropolis wearing those
lumberjack shirts? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Christmas for the Brooks' was always a happy and fun time, even in the
lean years.
I lost my parents the last few years around this time. I want
Christmas to still be fun and happy for my family, but sometimes i
have a bit of a hard time with out the parent units.
I was doing ok, but the
Dave,
Welcome back!!!
I like the shot too, but think it could be improved by
cropping out the half-guy on the left and some of the
pavement at the bottom.
Merry Christmas, bittersweet though the holidays are
when one reaches a certain age.
Rick
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good to have you back Dave.
No need to apologise either.
I appreciate how the holiday's can bum you out. Our family is very
subdued this Christmas, my Grandmother's dementia got bad enough that
she had to be put into care. There's a lot of guilt sadness at the
moment, and not enough little kids
Nice catch Dave.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A Peso and a Sorry
Christmas for the Brooks' was always a happy and fun time, even in the
lean years.
I lost my parents the last few years around this time. I want
Christmas
Dave,
Memories of our parents are strong at this time of year, for all the
times we shared - both good and less pleasant. The bad memories seem
to fade and the good stay with us as they should. I'm sure our folks
would want it this way. Keep yourself in good spirits over the
holidays as you are
.but Santa's workshop has been closed down.
.
.
Due to new government Elven Safety Regulations.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Don't be crazy. There's not Santa's workshop.
At least not any more.
All the elves jobs were out sourced to China, so the red suited tyrant
didn't have to put up with the Elven Occupational Health Safety
rules, the EWU (Elves Workers Union)
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/19/06, mike wilson [EMAIL
mike wilson wrote:
.but Santa's workshop has been closed down.
.
.
Due to new government Elven Safety Regulations.
Never mind Mike, here's a Christmas story:
When four of Santa's elves got sick, and the trainee elves did
not produce the toys as fast as the regular ones, Santa was
Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And so began the tradition of the little angel on top of the Christmas
tree...
YMMD
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
mike wilson wrote:
.but Santa's workshop has been closed down.
..
Due to new government Elven Safety Regulations.
New TV series here in the US of A called 'Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip
from the folks who created WEST WING
The basic bit is about the people at a fictional station
I realised that I had included all of the appropriate digest ..
..which may have made matters awkward for some of you I therefore
unreservedly apologise.
Rgds
Peter
Camera Direct
2054-10
Kida
Kajiki-cho
Kagoshima-ken
Japan
899-5241
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
No need to apologize. They always say a hard man is good to find.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
? I think the software automatically cuts it out now. I've deleted the post
but I don't remember the whole thing being there and it's not in the archive.
From: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/11 Wed AM 09:30:41 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Sorry for my cockup!
I realised that I
PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/11 Wed AM 09:30:41 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Sorry for my cockup!
I realised that I had included all of the appropriate digest ..
..which may have made matters awkward for some of you I therefore
unreservedly apologise.
Rgds
Peter
--
PDML
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, mike wilson wrote:
I've deleted the post but I don't remember the whole thing being there
If we are only talking about one post, the digest was not there.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
:-)))
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No need to apologize. They always say a hard man is good to find.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
__
Do You Yahoo!?
On 11/10/06, Peter, discombobulated, unleashed:
I therefore unreservedly apologise.
Quite right too ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Don't worry, this to shall pass...
So, from my reading of the release, it seems they've fixed some of the
gripes I have with the *ist D but I have a couple questions. Sorry if these
have been addressed in the posts, I haven't been able to read them all.
Will it know if you're shooting
of the release, it seems they've fixed some of the
gripes I have with the *ist D but I have a couple questions. Sorry if
these
have been addressed in the posts, I haven't been able to read them all.
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's
right
way round when
John Forbes wrote:
cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's
right way round when you download?
I also would like to know this, but have seen no mention of it
anywhere,
and I think I have read just about all of the 2,000
On 13.09.2006, at 13:41 , Mark Roberts wrote:
I haven't even heard any *rumours* about the presence/absence of this
kind of feature!
Which probably means it's not present :(
Pity, because it would be a big workflow boon for pros or anyone else
who shoots a *lot* of images.
Expect surprise
On 13/09/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13.09.2006, at 13:41 , Mark Roberts wrote:
I haven't even heard any *rumours* about the presence/absence of this
kind of feature!
Which probably means it's not present :(
Pity, because it would be a big workflow boon for pros or
On 13/9/06, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's right
way round when you download?
Vertical orientation sensor.
Sure it's a plus, but to be honest I wish I could switch it off on the
1D. There are times when I would like to
Cotty wrote:
On 13/9/06, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's
right
way round when you download?
Vertical orientation sensor.
Sure it's a plus, but to be honest I wish I could switch it off on the
1D. There
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's right
way round when you download?
That's been a gripe of mine with the -DS (that I only remember
when processing a bunch of images). It seems like they could probably use
the SR sensors to detect orientation, so
Maybe i'm wrong... but i remember me rotating Canon S3 camera
unsuccessfully - still the image stayed the same in LCD :)
So i thing better leave just info in EXIF - not allow to affect how it
looks in camera.
G
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the
On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:25, Cotty wrote:
Vertical orientation sensor.
Sure it's a plus, but to be honest I wish I could switch it off on the
1D. There are times when I would like to see the pic on the LCD on the
back in 'full frame' view, instead of rotated to the height of the
shortest
On Sep 13, 2006, at 5:25 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 13/9/06, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so
it's right
way round when you download?
Vertical orientation sensor.
Sure it's a plus, but to be honest I wish I could switch it
Mark Roberts wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's
right way round when you download?
I also would like to know this, but have seen no mention of it
anywhere,
and I think I have
Yes Cotty it makes perfect sens to me.
It's quite obvious but maybe not for the manufacturers ;)
2006/9/13, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 13/9/06, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's right
way round when you download?
Makes lots of sense - since I have experienced this myself viewing
someone else's review screen. The rotated image was much too small to
see compared to the horizontal image. If the K10D does have this
rotation feature, I would want the behavior that Cotty describes or at
least able to turn it
Yes, it makes sense.
Cotty wrote:
On 13/9/06, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Will it know if you're shooting vertical and write the image so it's right
way round when you download?
Vertical orientation sensor.
Sure it's a plus, but to be honest I wish I could switch it off
On 13/09/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hadn't thought of that issue. I certainly wouldn't want my
autorotation to affect how the camera displays images on its LCD. I just
want it in the EXIF and to have software like Photoshop and Bridge
automatically recognize it.
Yes, that's
On 13/9/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I seem to recall that the newest Digital Rebel has the option to
sense rotation but not rotate in the preview. Actually, I recall a
lot of options with regard to that sensor (which I'd really like in
the K10D, as long as we're going
On Sep 13, 2006, at 15:17, Cotty wrote:
On 13/9/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I seem to recall that the newest Digital Rebel has the option to
sense rotation but not rotate in the preview. Actually, I recall a
lot of options with regard to that sensor (which I'd really
On 13/9/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I speak of the 400D or the Rebel xti. You've got that one?
1DmII
From the DPReview preview of that camera:
Play rotate options
The EOS 400D now gets the same three-position automatic rotate option
that we first saw on the EOS
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 13/9/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I speak of the 400D or the Rebel xti. You've got that one?
1DmII
From the DPReview preview of that camera:
Play rotate options
The EOS 400D now gets the same three-position automatic rotate
On 13/9/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I 'll also bring the D2H incase we need a hammer.:-)
I'll bring tent pegs.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
work ?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No! ;-)
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Michel Carrere-Gee
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:21 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: test sorry !
work ?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Don Sanderson a écrit :
No! ;-)
Yes, works now
:-D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yes!
Dave
At 10:20 PM 29/06/2006, you wrote:
work ?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/29 Thu PM 02:36:11 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: test sorry !
No! ;-)
D
Play!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Michel Carrere-Gee
Sent
On 26/12/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I got to play with the Canon full frame Friday.
Which one, Don?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
EOS-1Ds Mark II
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:42 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Sorry, Pentax, I have to sell my collections
On 26/12/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I got to play
I should add that they had a 5D but I couldn't pry it away
from another guy who was looking.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 6:54 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Sorry, Pentax, I have to sell my
Testing 1 2 3 4
Sorry - my last few missives to the PDML bounced back as rejected, so I'm
trying to figure out what has gone wrong (all of a sudden, with no change
on my end that I am aware of).
Fred
On 27/12/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
EOS-1Ds Mark II
I'm dying to try the K15mm 3.5 on one of those.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 26 Dec 2005 at 17:52, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
A large diameter lens mount and a short register leaves more space
for correcting elements at the rear of a lens unit, used to provide
greater telecentricity to the edges and corners of a large sensor.
Sensor technology may well come to
On Dec 28, 2005, at 5:29 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I've really only had two lenses where the rear element looked
cramped in the Pentax mount and they were the A*135/1.8 and A*85/1.4.
50/1.2 is also pretty cramped... but I think the A*85/1.4 is very
slightly bigger.
It's interesting how both
I have to put half of my collections on Ebay for sale these days, including
rare MZ-3 Black version and Refconverter A.
It is so sad that I couldn't see hope from Pentax.
The only thing I need is the DFA tele lens now. If it still doen't come next
year. I will have to sell all my Pentax
I got to play with the Canon full frame Friday.
I _really_ wish Pentax would do something to tempt my
tummy like that one does.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Guoping Huang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 11:28 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Sorry
In a message dated 12/26/2005 9:35:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I got to play with the Canon full frame Friday.
I _really_ wish Pentax would do something to tempt my
tummy like that one does.
Don
==
Be nice if they came out with a manual focus DSLR -- like a digital
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 11:28 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Sorry, Pentax, I have to sell my collections
I have to put half of my collections on Ebay for sale these days,
including
rare MZ-3 Black version and Refconverter A.
It is so sad that I couldn't see hope from
, December 26, 2005 11:28 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Sorry, Pentax, I have to sell my collections
I have to put half of my collections on Ebay for sale these days,
including
rare MZ-3 Black version and Refconverter A.
It is so sad that I couldn't see hope from Pentax.
The only thing I need
with the Canon full frame Friday.
I _really_ wish Pentax would do something to tempt my
tummy like that one does.
Don
-Original Message-
Wrom: AIJJPHSCRTNHGSWZIDREXCAXZOWCONEUQZAAFXISHJEXXIMQZU
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 11:28 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Sorry, Pentax, I have
collections except for 3
LTD lenses and maybe one MZ-5n..
First, let me humbly suggest you try Friday For Sale before EBay...
Second - I actually think Pentax is still perfectly fine... Sorry to be
in disagreement with you and probably others, but I don't think Pentax
does not suit my
But Pentax would have to include an aperture simulator and we have it on
good authority that it will never happen.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/26/2005 9:35:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I got to play with the Canon full frame Friday.
I _really_
On 12/27/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Count me out. I'm happy with APS-C. Full frame would require a new lens
mount to be effective.
Why would it need a new mount?
I can't afford all new glass. So fror those who
want full frame, Canon is the easy and obvious choice. Why wish?
In a message dated 12/26/2005 10:10:54 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But Pentax would have to include an aperture simulator and we have it on
good authority that it will never happen.
===
Ooops. Forget what I said.
We don't want to go there.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Unsurprising since the Nikon WA's are known to be better performers than
the Canons, in general. I know of people using Nikon WA's on Canon FF
bodies just fine.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
I've seen all the arguments that a full frame sensor would require a
larger diameter lens mount, but
On 26 Dec 2005 at 12:56, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Count me out. I'm happy with APS-C. Full frame would require a new lens
mount to be effective. I can't afford all new glass.
What do you base this supposition on?
So fror those who
want full frame, Canon is the easy and obvious choice. Why
My assumption regarding the lens mount is based only on information
presented here in regard to optimum angles for light distribution to a
sensor. And of course the fact that those makers without a large lens
mount have opted for APS-C. I also find it interesting that everyone
seems to assume
This one time, at band camp, Guoping Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to put half of my collections on Ebay for sale these days, including
rare MZ-3 Black version and Refconverter A.
It is so sad that I couldn't see hope from Pentax.
I cant say I blame you. I am holding out as long as
On 26 Dec 2005 at 17:14, Paul Stenquist wrote:
My assumption regarding the lens mount is based only on information
presented here in regard to optimum angles for light distribution to a
sensor.
Distance from the focal plane may play affect quality but lens mount diameter
isn't likely to
On Dec 26, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Good for you and them, but not so good for those it doesn't suite.
I don't know those markets where APS-C isn't suitable.. Even at 6
megapixels, APS-C appears to be good enough for any stock house on the
planet. It's good enough for magazine
Snipped
It's good enough for magazine photography, and it makes very
nice 13 x 19 prints.
Paul
I recently did a photo of a friend for a joke Christmas gift to his wife.
I gave the photo to my marketing buddy(all Mac)and he produced 11x14 or 12x14(i
I got to play with the Canon full
frame Friday.
I _really_ wish Pentax would do something to tempt my
tummy like that one does.
Don
The salesman i deal with at one of our chain stores has the 5D. When aske dhow
he liked
it, he
paused, stumpled and
Sorry to hear that.
I'll sell you my D2H if you want.
Then you''ll appreciate the Ppentax line up.
Dave
I have to put half of my collections on Ebay
for sale these days, including
rare MZ-3 Black version and Refconverter A.
It is so sad that I couldn't
just never did that after
Z-1p.
Guoping
First, let me humbly suggest you try Friday For Sale before EBay...
Second - I actually think Pentax is still perfectly fine... Sorry to be
in disagreement with you and probably others, but I don't think Pentax
does not suit my needs... Your mileage
On Dec 26, 2005, at 4:04 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
My assumption regarding the lens mount is based only on information
presented here in regard to optimum angles for light distribution
to a
sensor.
Distance from the focal plane may play affect quality but lens
mount diameter
isn't likely
On 12/27/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also find it interesting that everyone
seems to assume that a full-frame Pentax digital would somehow be much
more affordable than a full-frame Canon. I doubt if anyone can better
the price of the 5D. But as I said, I'm happy with APS-C,
Of course, some people might disagree with you. Less info and a simpler
camera would be my preference.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Guoping Huang
First, Pentax should put more info in the viewfinder, like the METERING
MODE
Hi!
You are absolutely right. I am very happy with wide-mid primes that
Pentax made.
Good ;-). It feels good to be right every now and then ;-).
But,
First, Pentax should put more info in the viewfinder, like the METERING
MODE !!!
I'd rather they've put in the ISO rating... Otherwise, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got to play with the Canon full
frame Friday.
I _really_ wish Pentax would do something to tempt my
tummy like that one does.
Don
The salesman i deal with at one of our chain stores has the 5D. When aske dhow
he
I haven't seen anything on the news about it here. The first I heard was
your email about it. Since the final is today (in 20 minutes), there may be
a short piece about it on London's local news programmes, but I wouldn't
expect anything more than that.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original
That's funny. It made the news here last night.
Apparently one of the better players can speak conversational
English...he's just memorised a lot of words.
Dave
On 11/20/05, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen anything on the news about it here. The first I heard was
your email
David Savage wrote:
That's funny. It made the news here last night.
Apparently one of the better players can speak conversational
English...he's just memorised a lot of words.
Dave
Oooh you must have seen Adam... He is brilliant
but terminally shy and
awkward - however while memorizing
On 11/21/05, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
That's funny. It made the news here last night.
Apparently one of the better players can speak conversational
English...he's just memorised a lot of words.
That should have read can't speak... g
Dave
Oooh you
Cotty, are ya gonna photo the World Scrabble
Championship?
My Scrabble grandson Adam Logan will be facing
off in the finals
against Thai player Pakorn Nemitrmansuk (Who I
played in his first
US championship back in 1996 - he beat me)
Adam is one of those on my Winners calendar, and
although I
Cotty, are ya gonna photo the World Scrabble
Championship?
My Scrabble grandson Adam Logan will be facing
off in the finals
against Thai player Pakorn Nemitrmansuk (Who I
played in his first
US championship back in 1996 - he beat me)
Adam is one of those on my Winners calendar, and
although I
Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can't concentrate on anything else - not even Scarbble...
Is that spelling approved in the official Scrabble dictionary?
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 19/11/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, are ya gonna photo the World Scrabble
Championship?
Unless it's in the south midlands of England, highly unlikely.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Mark Roberts wrote:
Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can't concentrate on anything else - not even Scarbble...
Is that spelling approved in the official Scrabble dictionary?
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
drat - I thought I caught that
Cotty wrote:
On 19/11/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, are ya gonna photo the World Scrabble
Championship?
Unless it's in the south midlands of England, highly unlikely.
Cheers,
Cotty
Wondered what you saw news wise over there - (I
keep thinking you are
Hi folks,
January Technology
FebruaryGeometrical
March Patterns
April Askew
May Green
JunePeople
JulyWhat Is It? (Mystery Shot)
On 9/10/05, Adelheid v. K., discombobulated, unleashed:
JanuaryTechnology
February Geometrical
March Patterns
April Askew
MayGreen
June People
July What Is
201 - 300 of 474 matches
Mail list logo