Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-25 Thread Douglas Newman
--- K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, Sony brand should be really at work here. I agree... In fact in most respects the Minolta 5D was a better camera than the Alpha, but it did not have the Sony name and also the 10 MP figure which attracts customers (it was after all the first

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Dario Bonazza
share of the K100D could be diluted by a longer time when it was not available. Dario - Original Message - From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:00 AM Subject: Turbulent age Hi folks, It looks like

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Cotty
On 23/8/06, K.Takeshita, discombobulated, unleashed: Interesting to see what's going to happen toward Photokina when many new models should come out. 350D upgrade is already leaking but does not interest me. It appears to have some sort of (mild) dust reduction sys. 400D with self-cleaning

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, K.Takeshita wrote: Hi folks, It looks like the market in Japan is now tangling up. http://bcnranking.jp/flash/09-9669.html If you scroll down to the last graph, it shows the shift in market share. NavyCanon Yellow Nikon Red Sony Blue Pentax

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Thibouille
I think they did put Minolta in Sony if it is DSLRs only. 2006/8/24, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, K.Takeshita wrote: Hi folks, It looks like the market in Japan is now tangling up. http://bcnranking.jp/flash/09-9669.html If you scroll down to

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Aaron Reynolds wrote: On Aug 24, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: Thanks Ken. It would have been nice to know where Minolta was. Is that SLR-only? ...out of business? What, already in that period? Wasn't Sony alpha a quick succession to whatever the

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Aug 24, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: Thanks Ken. It would have been nice to know where Minolta was. Is that SLR-only? ...out of business? -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
On 24.08.2006, at 13:02 , Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: What, already in that period? Wasn't Sony alpha a quick succession to whatever the Minolta model was? I am trying to deduce if Sony really start from scratch and where they are now, compared to where Minolta left it. Well, essentaily Alpha

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread K.Takeshita
On 8/24/06 6:13 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Ken. It would have been nice to know where Minolta was. Is that SLR-only? Hi Kostas, Other folks already answered this while I was sleeping ;-). Cheers, Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread K.Takeshita
On 8/24/06 7:58 AM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. More females (new entry to DSLR) are buying Sony Alpha than males BTW, my take is that the overwhelming sales spike right after the launch of Alpha must have a lot to do with this. Alpha 100, considering the price point (with kit

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread K.Takeshita
On 8/24/06 4:14 AM, Dario Bonazza, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the time interval considered for market shares in the table published there? Since the K100D is there, it shouldn't be a long time. However, it is also possible that the K100D was only distributed during the latest part of

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 24/08/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/06 7:58 AM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overwhelming market domination by big 2 is not only unhealthy but deterimental to us all, the consumers. You'd think so but it doesn't seem to be doing the Canon consumers any harm? --

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Adam Maas
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Aaron Reynolds wrote: On Aug 24, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: Thanks Ken. It would have been nice to know where Minolta was. Is that SLR-only? ...out of business? What, already in that period? Wasn't Sony alpha a quick

Re: Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread DagT
Fra: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/08/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/06 7:58 AM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overwhelming market domination by big 2 is not only unhealthy but deterimental to us all, the consumers. You'd think so but it

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread K.Takeshita
On 8/24/06 8:33 AM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You'd think so but it doesn't seem to be doing the Canon consumers any harm? Well, I do not know about them, but the healthier competitions keep those big 2 (particularly Canon :-) honest for sure, which is good for Canon users

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Pål Jensen
- Original Message - From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, Sony brand should be really at work here. Interestuing to see how Sony will fare in the future. My understanding is that the Sony brand is quite strong in Japan and in the US. However, in the rest of the world Sony

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Thibouille
Yes and even then there's brand recognition in a specific market. I know trhat e.g. Pentax sells (or sold?) scanner at least in the US. I dunno anything about Pentax and scanners so I'd probably not even look at those. Same goes for Sony: nearly all my Hi-fi equipment is Sony (10-15 years old

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Pål Jensen
- Original Message - From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] People are moving, and Canon looks oldfashioned. I think that the brand perception with digital is moving away from the structure it had for film cameras. Camera are now consumer electronic products, an area where brand recognition

RE: Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Bob W
You'd think so but it doesn't seem to be doing the Canon consumers any harm? Or maybe it does. Right now there are two Canon users who agree that they should have bought Nikon D200. They don't want larger sensors, but they do want better viewfinders. A third person did switch

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread K.Takeshita
On 8/24/06 9:13 AM, Pål Jensen, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interestuing to see how Sony will fare in the future. My understanding is that the Sony brand is quite strong in Japan and in the US. However, in the rest of the world Sony is just another anonymous consumer electronics manufacturer,

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Aug 24, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Pål Jensen wrote: What the pros are using, and particular the photo journalists, are less important now for brand recognition I had two different sports photographers ask me on Tuesday what I knew about the new Pentax bodies after seeing that I was shooting with

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Pål Jensen Subject: Re: Turbulent age Interestuing to see how Sony will fare in the future. My understanding is that the Sony brand is quite strong in Japan and in the US. However, in the rest of the world Sony is just another anonymous consumer

RE: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Bob W
What the pros are using, and particular the photo journalists, are less important now for brand recognition I had two different sports photographers ask me on Tuesday what I knew about the new Pentax bodies after seeing that I was shooting with Pentax. The game was actually quite

RE: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Bob W wrote: What the pros are using, and particular the photo journalists, are less important now for brand recognition I had two different sports photographers ask me on Tuesday what I knew about the new Pentax bodies after seeing that I was shooting with Pentax.

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Aug 24, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Bob W wrote: Photojournalists that I know or have spoken to are always interested in who's using what and why. It's important for them to have an edge on the competition, so if they see someone using something unconventional they want to know what benefit it is

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Tom C
@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Turbulent age Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:14:10 -0400 On 8/24/06 7:58 AM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. More females (new entry to DSLR) are buying Sony Alpha than males BTW, my take is that the overwhelming sales spike right

RE: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Bob W
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kostas Kavoussanakis Sent: 24 August 2006 16:26 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: Turbulent age On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Bob W wrote: What the pros are using, and particular the photo

RE: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Bob W
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Reynolds Sent: 24 August 2006 16:10 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Turbulent age On Aug 24, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Bob W wrote: Photojournalists that I know or have spoken

RE: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Aaron Reynolds
My reply wasn't directly addressing it, just relating a recent anecdote. -Aaron -- http://aaronreynolds.ca http://battersbox.ca http://hardballtimes.com -Original Message- From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: RE: Turbulent age Date: Thu 2006 Aug 24 11:26 am Size: 1K

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Pål Jensen
- Original Message - From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to point out that these figures are only for Japan and do not necessarially reflect the worldwide picture. Sure, but the japanese have a tendency of pioneering world-wide trends when it comes to photo equipment. Pål

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Tom C
Not debating that. :-) Tom C. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Turbulent age Date: Thu, 24 Aug

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Tom C
Sure, but the japanese have a tendency of pioneering world-wide trends when it comes to photo equipment. Pål BTW, I failed to mention that I enjoyed many of your photos in the recent gallery you displayed. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread P. J. Alling
Minolta is folded into Sony, so that's probably where it is. Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, K.Takeshita wrote: Hi folks, It looks like the market in Japan is now tangling up. http://bcnranking.jp/flash/09-9669.html If you scroll down to the last graph, it shows the

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread DagT
Den 24. aug. 2006 kl. 15.58 skrev Bob W: You'd think so but it doesn't seem to be doing the Canon consumers any harm? Or maybe it does. Right now there are two Canon users who agree that they should have bought Nikon D200. They don't want larger sensors, but they do want better

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Cotty
On 24/8/06, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed: On 8/24/06 7:58 AM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overwhelming market domination by big 2 is not only unhealthy but deterimental to us all, the consumers. You'd think so but it doesn't seem to be doing the Canon consumers

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread P. J. Alling
With full K mount lens compatibility... sigh Cotty wrote: On 24/8/06, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed: On 8/24/06 7:58 AM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overwhelming market domination by big 2 is not only unhealthy but deterimental to us all, the

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread P. J. Alling
I don't think they believed the list so much as their own marketing division. The problem was more that Canon and Kodak were ready to release or had released higher resolution full frame offerings for less than Pentax could sell the MZ-D for and still have some hope of recouping RD and

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Tom C
. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Turbulent age Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:02:31 -0400 On Aug 24

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Cotty wrote: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/prototypes/MZ-D.html C'est la vie, uh? Yeah, but did you ever see the pictures it took? It took balls, but killing that thing off was probably the smartest move they made in a decade. -Aaron -- PDML

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread graywolf
Kind of like Disney, heh? -- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf Idiot Proof == Expert Proof --- William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Pål Jensen Subject: Re: Turbulent age Interestuing

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread graywolf
Of course, Pentax believed the list when everyone said no one would pay that much for a camera. Strangely Canon, Nikon, and Kodak sold a lot of cameras in that price range. Oh well. -- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf Idiot Proof == Expert Proof

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread John Forbes
: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Turbulent age Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:02:31 -0400 On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Cotty wrote: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/prototypes/MZ-D.html

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-24 Thread Tom C
pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Turbulent age Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:53:31 +0100 On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:17:41 +0100, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you ask me they should have just waited around and stuck an APS-C sensor in it and called it good. They would still have produced a 6MP DSLR

Turbulent age

2006-08-23 Thread K.Takeshita
Hi folks, It looks like the market in Japan is now tangling up. http://bcnranking.jp/flash/09-9669.html If you scroll down to the last graph, it shows the shift in market share. NavyCanon Yellow Nikon Red Sony Blue Pentax Purple Oly Since the entry by Sony and Pentax's

RE: Turbulent age

2006-08-23 Thread Tom C
sharply peaked and are in this snapshot declining? Tom C. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Turbulent age

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-23 Thread K.Takeshita
On 8/23/06 7:18 PM, Tom C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure how you link the last graph to the 5D. Oh, I was not linking 5D to this info. Toward the end of the post, I just remember that there was an article about sales of K100D exceeded 5D, and 5D was not as popular as initially thought

Re: Turbulent age

2006-08-23 Thread Douglas Newman
--- K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like the market in Japan is now tangling up. http://bcnranking.jp/flash/09-9669.html This is very interesting... Canon has obviously had a VERY precipitous drop in sales. That said, they are supposedly set to introduce a 10 MP Rebel at