The semi-monochrome with the orange/pink dress is wonderful. -T
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Since I'm on the subject
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/03/eastersaturday/index.html
If you are having a long weekend break, hope you are
Since I'm on the subject
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/03/eastersaturday/index.html
If you are having a long weekend break, hope you are having a pleasant
one. I am.
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mar 30, 2013, at 3:10 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Since I'm on the subject
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/03/eastersaturday/index.html
If you are having a long weekend break, hope you are having a pleasant one. I
am.
I quite liked the one of the girl in the red dress. You
Love #17! And of course there's nothing like a beautiful woman on a bike!
;-)
Great stuff, all of it!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au
Sent: March 30, 2013 3/30/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT GESO - some more X100 fun
Gadzooks. Are there really Shadowfaxes riding up and down the shores of
Ireland like that? I'll swap ya
On 21/01/2013 8:47 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 20/1/13, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some pics from this weekend. The exposure was all over the place; I
think the X100
What Frank said, Derby.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:20 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Usual brilliance.
Fave: Eighth shot of the first (colour) set.
Hope you get the x100 sorted out.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Derby Chang der
Some pics from this weekend. The exposure was all over the place; I
think the X100 shutter is acting up again. Oh well
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/01/tryouts/index.html
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/01/fount/index.html
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au
On 20/1/13, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some pics from this weekend. The exposure was all over the place; I
think the X100 shutter is acting up again. Oh well
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/01/tryouts/index.html
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/13/01/fount/index.html
Usual brilliance.
Fave: Eighth shot of the first (colour) set.
Hope you get the x100 sorted out.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au
Sent: January 20, 2013 1/20/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT GESO - I think my X100 is ill
I'm with you on the x100s. Sounds like a dream.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv
Sent: January 20, 2013 1/20/13
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT GESO - I think my X100 is ill again
On 20/1/13, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed
On 25/12/12, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
For me, the positives of image quality and stealthiness vastly outweigh
the negatives.
That said, rumours of the X100 replacement, using the X-Pro1 sensor,
coming out very soon makes me giddy
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/12/15/fujifilm
. And since this review came out, the autofocus in the X100
has improved, so the freeze isn't too bad.
For me, the positives of image quality and stealthiness vastly outweigh
the negatives.
That said, rumours of the X100 replacement, using the X-Pro1 sensor,
coming out very soon makes me
On 31/10/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
you've been using Pentax so it's
just a question of getting use to a different kind of quirky
Gotta be a MARK!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--www.seeingeye.tv
On 10/31/12 10:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I hope you enjoy it! I'll be interested to hear what you think of it
after you get a chance to use it for a while.
Godfrey
Thanks. Will do. I'm hoping the excitement of new stuff will give me a
little boost, get me out of the photo rut I feel
On 10/31/12 11:16 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Excellent. I hear it's quirky, but you've been using Pentax so it's
just a question of getting use to a different kind of quirky. ;-)
As long as it doesn't fight me every step of the way, I'll be good. But
yeah, sometimes the stuff I read make
In case anyone is keeping score at home, I pulled the trigger on one of
these beasties this morning. It should be here by Monday and I'll begin
running it through its paces a bit. It'll be my first non-Pentax camera
in twenty-some years.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I hope you enjoy it! I'll be interested to hear what you think of it
after you get a chance to use it for a while.
Godfrey
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
In case anyone is keeping score at home, I pulled the trigger on one of
these beasties this morning.
Excellent. I hear it's quirky, but you've been using Pentax so it's
just a question of getting use to a different kind of quirky. ;-)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
In case anyone is keeping score at home, I pulled the trigger on one of
these beasties
der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/751784-REG/Fujifilm_16128244_Finepix_X100_12_MP.html
I think it is a gorgeous camera. This review (on BH) would make me
want to peruse some X100 forum posts before I spent that much,
however.
start of review:
The form factor
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/751784-REG/Fujifilm_16128244_Finepix_X100_12_MP.html
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/751784-REG/Fujifilm_16128244_Finepix_X100_12_MP.html
I think it is a gorgeous camera. This review (on BH) would make me
want to peruse some X100 forum posts before I spent that much
Like with most things, would love to spend a month with one to see if I
could live with it. I suspect I could.
Cotty
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On 13/10/12, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually, I'd be interested the views of any PDMLers using this camera
or the x10 as well.
As you know Christine, I love the X10 and find it perfect for what it
does. I don't use the manual focus because it's far to fiddly and the
On 14/10/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's more
naturally used as an LCD-VF camera. The optical VF is not great and
only gives about 80% coverage, but it's a godsend in the bright
daylight conditions when the LCD is hard to use.
The only thing I would say to this is that
On 14/10/12, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
The silent operation and sensor/lens combo certainly weigh in its favor
for me. Sine you and Bob both mention how easy the buttons and dials can
be disturbed, that would be something I'd have to monitor, and exp comp
is something I use
life. For an afternoon walk around, I
always have a spare battery or two. X100 battery life is definitely
better than the OM-D, but nowhere near as good as the K-5
D
Thanks, Derby. Battery life is a big deal, so thanks for pointing that
out. Sounds like you and I share a common set-up regarding
On 10/14/12 5:00 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
If you go for a used one, be careful with the sticky aperture problem
since the used ones are not under warrantee. Later production models
have fixed the problem.
Thanks, Steve. I've read about that a few times now, so will definitely
keep it in
I've read that it's frustrating. Is it more trouble than its worth?
The X100 is a curate's egg. It's very well made and solid, the optical
quality is very good, and its viewfinder is superb. I keep it set up in
silent mode, with all the frills switched off and like this it is a very
good, fast
Hi Doug,
Everything Bob says about the X100, I'd confirm. It certainly is a
quirky machine. I'd also add, if you were buying second hand, make sure
it is one of the later versions (serial number starting with 2).
I bought one of the early ones. Fine for a few months, then I got the
dreaded
right now with that tiny body and sensor. Nice in decent light.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hi Doug,
Everything Bob says about the X100, I'd confirm. It certainly is a quirky
machine. I'd also add, if you were buying second hand, make sure
great IQ albeit with
reportedly stone-age handling. Of course, the Q is out there really
cheap right now with that tiny body and sensor. Nice in decent light.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hi Doug,
Everything Bob says about the X100, I'd confirm
On 10/14/12 4:54 AM, Bob W wrote:
I've read that it's frustrating. Is it more trouble than its worth?
The X100 is a curate's egg. It's very well made and solid, the optical
quality is very good, and its viewfinder is superb. I keep it set up in
silent mode, with all the frills switched off
is something I use regularly enough to have the rear dial dedicated to
it on my cameras, I'd probably notice any changes.
How fast is the wake up time?
Doug
On 10/14/12 7:46 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Hi Doug,
Everything Bob says about the X100, I'd confirm. It certainly is a
quirky machine. I'd also
Thanks, Steve, very helpful. I've always been intrigued by this version and
the X100. I need to check it out at a camera store. I shall put that on the
TO DO list. Good to know about the optical VF and the lens quality on the X10.
If I were to invest in a *serious compact, * I'd want
Don't rule out the eye level electronic VF models. EVFs are pretty
good these days and OVFs are pretty rare.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Christine Aguila
christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Thanks, Steve, very helpful. I've always been intrigued by this version and
the X100. I need to check
always have a spare battery or two. X100 battery life is definitely
better than the OM-D, but nowhere near as good as the K-5
D
On 15/10/2012 12:36 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Hey Derbs,
Thanks for the info on the serial #. I'll check that out.
The silent operation and sensor/lens combo certainly
, about 2s. I have it on Quick
Start mode. With it turned off, it is about 3s. I set auto power off at
5min, and trained myself to half tap the shutter button once in a while.
Which leads to battery life. For an afternoon walk around, I always have a
spare battery or two. X100 battery life
I'm still intrigued by this camera, because to my eye, it fits well with
much of what I do and would make a good walking around camera.
Bob W? Cotty? Anyone else? I've read that it's frustrating. Is it more
trouble than its worth?
Thanks.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Actually, I'd be interested the views of any PDMLers using this camera or the
x10 as well. Cheers, Christine
On Oct 13, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
I'm still intrigued by this camera, because to my eye, it fits well with much
of what I do and would make a good
On 12 January 2012 04:12, li...@thrane.name wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, I dunno. I'm not a fan of the fad for ever smaller cameras. My
K200D is about right. I've handled a K-r and it's too small. An APS
mirrorless camera of any size has an advantage over a DSLR in being able
to
Bob W. has an x100. Any comments on its autofocus (or manual focus, for
that matter)?
cheers,
frank
I use the camera almost exclusively in 'silent mode', in which manual focus
is switched off. The autofocus seems ok to me, but typically I've already
locked focus before pressing
Thanks, Bob. I've heard that the manual focus is next to useless. Sounds like
the AF may be workable.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
Sent: January 13, 2012 1/13/12
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Fuji X Pro 1 (X100
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 08:35 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Steven Desjardins wrote:
Size comparison with K5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
Confirmed, the X-Pro 1 is just another way to make a K-5.
IMHO, an APS rangefinder-style camera should be much smaller than that.
Brian Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 08:35 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Steven Desjardins wrote:
Size comparison with K5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
Confirmed, the X-Pro 1 is just another way to make a K-5.
IMHO, an APS rangefinder-style camera should be much
On 1/12/2012 12:58 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Assuming that one already owns a medium-size APS DSLR system, I don't
see the point of the X-Pro 1 because it does not give noticeable
size/weight advantage. Oh, and I can already use all of my lenses on a
K-5 ;-)
When they come out with 10 - 20
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, I dunno. I'm not a fan of the fad for ever smaller cameras. My
K200D is about right. I've handled a K-r and it's too small. An APS
mirrorless camera of any size has an advantage over a DSLR in being able
to accept virtually any lens (provided appropriate
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 09:58 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 08:35 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Steven Desjardins wrote:
Size comparison with K5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
Confirmed, the X-Pro 1 is just another way to
the x100 but nowhere near dslr capability. Fuji acknowledges that
but says fast focusing is not what that camera is about.
Perhaps not, but that might affect its ability to be a good street shooter.
Apparently the manual focus is just as frustrating (at least on the x100; don't
know about
with the Fuji is the slow autofocus. Apparently
it's better than the x100 but nowhere near dslr capability. Fuji acknowledges
that but says fast focusing is not what that camera is about.
Perhaps not, but that might affect its ability to be a good street shooter.
Apparently the manual focus
/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version, called X Pro 1,
with (initially) 3 primes:
* 18mm f/2
* 35mm f/1.4
* 60mm f/2.4 macro
Registration distance is said to be 17.7mm
AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm surprised none of you are talking about this camera:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_mount
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: Fuji X Pro 1 (X100 + interchangeable lenses)
David Parsons wrote:
Because M43
- From: Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: Fuji X Pro 1 (X100 + interchangeable lenses)
David Parsons wrote:
Because M43 has the same registration distance as the K mount. You'd
need
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:25:52AM -0500, David Parsons wrote:
Because M43 has the same registration distance as the K mount. You'd
need an optical adapter to use M43 lenses properly.
You're confusing Four Thirds with Micro Four Thirds.
The 4/3 register distance is about the same as that of
Bob W. has an x100. Any comments on its autofocus (or manual focus, for that
matter)?
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Sent: January 12, 2012 1/12/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Fuji X Pro 1 (X100 + interchangeable
Size comparison with K5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
It's very useful to have and eye level finder for long lenses and MF.
In the context of this thread, however, that VF doesn't need to be
On 11/1/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Size comparison with K5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
Interesting.
Brilliant website!
http://camerasize.com/
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
LOL. I should have just linked to the original site. It really is the
same size ad the M9.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 11/1/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Size comparison with K5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
Steven Desjardins wrote:
Size comparison with K5
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
Confirmed, the X-Pro 1 is just another way to make a K-5.
IMHO, an APS rangefinder-style camera should be much smaller than that.
Otherwise, it's rather pointless.
Dario
--
PDML
:
I'm surprised none of you are talking about this camera:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version, called X Pro 1,
with (initially) 3
://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version, called X Pro 1,
with (initially) 3 primes:
* 18mm f/2
* 35mm f/1.4
* 60mm f/2.4 macro
Miserere wrote:
I, for one, am excited about this camera, which to my mind is what the
X100 should've been from the start.
I agree, except for size. IMO, the X Pro 1 is (so far) the closest thing to
a contemporary rangefinder-style system camera and better than the M9, which
is too fat
I wrote:
Conceived and built as it is, the X Pro 1 is not far from being just a
different way to make a K-5.
However, I'm interested in the X Pro 1 sensor concept and the advantages it
can deliver once put in a smaller camera body.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Fuji's EXR sensor could be a real advantage if they can perfect it.
The X-10's IQ is very good, especially given the little 2/3 sensor.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
I wrote:
Conceived and built as it is, the X Pro 1 is not far from being just
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks
nicer, but it's not as useful a tool in terms of information provided.
Of course, we're
On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:47 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks
nicer, but it's not as useful a tool
Just to mention, I have the detachable VF-2 to go with my E-P2. It's
essential in bright light.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide
That very much depends on the camera. But from my experience yesterday
with the E-PL1 in bright California sunshine (checking out the 40-150
lens that has mysteriously turned up in my wife's camera kit) I think
the add-on eye-level finder will soon end up in the bag, too.
I use the LCD or an
On 10/1/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks
nicer, but it's not as useful a tool in terms of information provided.
Of course, we're used to
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:52:24AM -0800, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:47 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex
It's very useful to have and eye level finder for long lenses and MF.
In the context of this thread, however, that VF doesn't need to be
optical. The X Pro can switch back and forth between the two, but I
wonder how necessary that really is if the EVF is fairly high res.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at
, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course they had to wait until I decided to buy the X10 before they
made the announcement!
Sounds like the camera I wanted the X100 to be (which I also owned and
sold and replaced with the X10)
Wendy
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Miserere miser
:
Of course they had to wait until I decided to buy the X10 before they
made the announcement!
Sounds like the camera I wanted the X100 to be (which I also owned and
sold and replaced with the X10)
Wendy
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm surprised none
DPR preview:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/01/09/FujifilmXPro1_Preview
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
That link didn't quite work:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/01/10/FujifilmXPro1_Preview
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
DPR preview:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/01/09/FujifilmXPro1_Preview
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
I'm surprised none of you are talking about this camera:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version, called X Pro 1,
with (initially) 3
? Because the menu was very
nearly impenetrable to me.
- When the Fuji X100 was announced, I was gung-ho for it. It looked
beautiful. But as soon as I handled one, I put it down. Beautiful as
the design might be, the locations of the controls and ergonomics in
use were hopeless for my hands. The menus
From: Miserere
I'm surprised none of you are talking about this camera:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version, called X Pro 1
On 8/1/12, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm surprised none of you are talking about this camera:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/
FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
I posted about it on FB a couple of days ago. Looks fabulous but I won't
be able to afford anything like
Mike I were doing the
rounds of the shops. I was expecting it to be metallic rather than plasticky
and that was a bit disappointing, but I suppose for half the price of the
X100 I shouldn't be disappointed.
The X1 sounds interesting, but not for me. I already have a couple of Leica
bodies
On 8/1/12, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty got the Fuji X10 raved how wonderful it was. It piqued my
interest because the combination of a manually controlled zoom with a
zooming optical finder seemed intriguing. I bought one. My sum up ...
You sly dog!!!
- I never saw any
On 8/1/12, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I had a little fondle of an X10 yesterday while Mike I were doing the
rounds of the shops. I was expecting it to be metallic rather than plasticky
and that was a bit disappointing,
Totally flummoxed at this! It is made of metal - well mine is and
I had a little fondle of an X10 yesterday while Mike I were doing
the
rounds of the shops. I was expecting it to be metallic rather than
plasticky
and that was a bit disappointing,
Totally flummoxed at this! It is made of metal - well mine is and
doesn't feel plasticky at all ??
the
surprised none of you are talking about this camera:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version, called X Pro 1,
with (initially) 3 primes
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 8/1/12, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty got the Fuji X10 raved how wonderful it was. It piqued my
interest because the combination of a manually controlled zoom with a
zooming optical finder seemed intriguing.
On 8/1/12, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
There are no bad photos there, technically, but they just lack
something that's difficult to articulate when I compare them to what I
get with my other cameras. They look like what I used to get with
other small sensor cameras, and it just
/01/FujiFilmMirrorless_2.jpg
There was interest on the list for the Fuji X100, and now Fuji are
finally releasing an interchangeable lens version, called X Pro 1,
with (initially) 3 primes:
* 18mm f/2
* 35mm f/1.4
* 60mm f/2.4 macro
Registration distance is said to be 17.7mm and the mount
On 8/1/12, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some nice photos of the camera in this post:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/two-new-full-size-x-pro-1-images
OH MY GOD i might have to rethink
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 8/1/12, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some nice photos of the camera in this post:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/two-new-full-size-x-pro-1-images
OH MY GOD i might have to rethink
LOL ... it's darn pretty, yes
Of course they had to wait until I decided to buy the X10 before they
made the announcement!
Sounds like the camera I wanted the X100 to be (which I also owned and
sold and replaced with the X10)
Wendy
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm surprised none of you
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
There's only 2 cameras I would buy at a moment's notice:
another Epson R-D1
a full-frame Pentax DSLR.
Have you ever tried a K-5? The only thing that it really gives up on a
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/10/05/fujifilm-to-release-an-interchangeable-lens-mirrorless-camera-in-early-2012/
No idea what it will look like, but I hope it is retro like the X100 / X10
CEO Shigetaka Komori stated
On 10/10/11, Sam L, discombobulated, unleashed:
Seems like Fuji is on a roll. I am looking forward to seeing what
this new one is.
I'm also looking forward to playing with the X10 in person, even tho I
suspect it will not be enough to get me to drop my pentax gear.
It doesn't interest me in the
On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 10/10/11, Sam L, discombobulated, unleashed:
Seems like Fuji is on a roll. I am looking forward to seeing what
this new one is.
I'm also looking forward to playing with the X10 in person, even tho I
suspect it will not be enough to get me to
Mark!
On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Sam L wrote:
Seems like Fuji is on a roll.
Sam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 10/10/11 21:49, Stan Halpin wrote:
Mark!
On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Sam L wrote:
Seems like Fuji is on a roll.
I actually have a few in my fridge. They're not more dead than they
used to be, as far as I can tell.
- T
Sam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
steve harley wrote:
on 2011-10-06 15:34 Dario Bonazza wrote
steve harley wrote:
on 2011-10-06 10:39 Darren Addy wrote
CEO Shigetaka Komori stated that both the resolution and the low
noise levels would be better than 35mm full frame sensors.
i don't see how they can do that, if they are
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/10/05/fujifilm-to-release-an-interchangeable-lens-mirrorless-camera-in-early-2012/
No idea what it will look like, but I hope it is retro like the X100 / X10
CEO Shigetaka Komori stated that both the resolution and the low
noise levels would be better than 35mm full
on 2011-10-06 10:39 Darren Addy wrote
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/10/05/fujifilm-to-release-an-interchangeable-lens-mirrorless-camera-in-early-2012/
No idea what it will look like, but I hope it is retro like the X100 / X10
CEO Shigetaka Komori stated that both the resolution and the low
On 11-10-06 4:48 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2011-10-06 10:39 Darren Addy wrote
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/10/05/fujifilm-to-release-an-interchangeable-lens-mirrorless-camera-in-early-2012/
No idea what it will look like, but I hope it is retro like the X100
/ X10
CEO Shigetaka Komori
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
