Hey Ryan, I haven't dealt with Centre.net.au at all, I just remember them
from the link that you sent me a while back...
I am flying in on Friday 27 Feb, and will arrive at 11-ish - was planning on
hiring a car at the airport, checking into my motel in the city (maybe
Riverside Hotel on Southbank?
Omigosh! That is hilarious Steve! You are, as Cotty made note of, one
CRAZY fellow! lol...
I LOVE this bit "performing a black-body radiation analysis: we are within
accepted norms for the commencement of thermal de-creasing "!
How funny you are! Seeing that you love it so much, wanna come and
Shel, I really enjoyed the article - it was most helpful to me and also a
kick in the butt to "stick to my guns" and not get carried away in the river
of "Flashdom". I used to shoot exclusively with available light for
weddings, and whilst I know now that it isn't always possible, this article
was
Wow! Gorgeous Josetein!
How on earth do you guys do these things?
Maybe I should start photographing specs of red dirt? lol You know, on
an aside, I have never seen snow in my entire life!
tan.
> Gang,
>
> Inspired by Mark Cassino's work, I have finally charged myself up to try
> some s
Ok, so with my Starkist about to be couriered to me - I have one final thing
that I may want to add to my order. CR Kennedy have told me that the DA
16-45mm is absolutely, positively not available in Australia for at least a
month. And so, I am stuck now for what I should do for a wide angle lens
John, Thanks so much for the offer, but I really want something that I can
order today and have in my hand tomorrow. What have your experiences been
thus far with this lens? Do you think it would "tide me over" until I am
able to obtain the DA 16-45?
BTW, I didn't even know that Sigma had an 18-
And while we are on the subject - what is the "rule" in regards to auctions?
I see some people say "we aren't supposed to link to unfinished auctions"
(which, oops, I have done heaps of times!), and then others that seem to
post them quite frequently - anyone know what the "go" is? I don't want to
frank, i tried to send you an off-list email last week and it bounced -
maybe a similar thing happened then?
tan.
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:05 AM
Subject: test
> Some jerk filled my inbox
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:48 PM
Subject: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 125mm F2.5 SL
Hi team,
A
Frits wrote:
"Tanya, Do you have any suggestions as to where I can get a piece of carton
suitable for this? Also tips for the anaesthetic are most welcome."
Frits, your average, run of the mill, refrigerator box should work (of
course, you'd need to buy a new refrigerator first, but it is little
Chris asked: "P.S.Tan,are you seriously trying to get the rest of us to
believe life is anything but quiet in Northern Banana Benders Land?(Northern
Queensland for the unititiated)."
QUIET?!?! In a house with 4 and 5 yo boys, and a 15 month old terror toddler
of a girl who has to make ALOT of nois
Hmmm, right you are Rob - the glass is half full! lol...
Now where can I get my hands on one of those Voightlander lenses...
tan.
> Hi Tan,
>
> It's all in your perspective. It just proves that the V is superb but the
P is
> infinitely better at f1.8 too :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Rob Studdert
> HU
skies, and
bright yellow sunflowers... Beautiful stuff!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: *istD Manufacture
>
> On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:49 PM, Tanya May
Shel wrote: " I think your living in a fairy world, John, if you don't
believe a flash may startle an unsuspecting driver."
erm, I'll have you know that there is simply *nothing* wrong with living in
a "fairy world"!?! I'm quite happy here thankyou very much, and I seem to
think the "more the merr
in white dress, with deep blue skies,
> > and
> > bright yellow sunflowers... Beautiful stuff!
> >
> > tan.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
lol! Don't hold back on my account Chris! You may have missed the post, but
just last week, one of the other southern Aussie guys was posting about me
being in "Far North QLD" and I corrected him - I was just kind of carrying
on the joke with you! lol...
BTW, I am nowhere near Quilpie either, lol
Jostein, I've been offline for a few days - is it too late for me?!?!?!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: PUG deadline - when?
> Your shot made it, Lon.
>
> Looks like nice beer...
Hi everyone - in regards to this thread, I haven't been following it too
closely, as I thought it was a discussion about film grain. However, I just
brushed over this and realised that it is relevant to digital too.
I am having a horror of a time with noise using my *istD, at ISO 400, with
all o
Shaun, I promise you that (unfortunately!), it DOESN'T work with PS 7.0, but
works perfectly when I am using PS CS. Not sure about Elements though, and
haven't tried it with Image Ready either. In PS 7.0 it does load the
plug-in, but when you try to open a RAW image it can't do it and gives an
er
a,
Western Australia, 6714
Mob: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-----
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D software update
Shaun, I promis
Hey everyone!
Well, I have been very quiet this past week and thought I'd give you an
update...
I took delivery of my *istD on Thursday 12 Feb - just over a week ago. It
took me that afternoon of shooting with it before I felt totally comfortable
with it. My initial misgiving with the camera w
John said: "I don't think it is significant whether pros are using the *ist.
What is significant is whether they are using cameras with similar-sized
pixel
counts, and they are."
I TOTALLY agree with you John!!
tan.
Christian asked: "BTW, did you get the D-BG1 grip? It should be your first
accessory if only for the vertical shutter release."
I have it on order with the cable release Christian but it was out of stock
at the time and I wanted the body YESTERDAY, so to speak!
Hopefully, it will arrive in a we
Shel, I love this shot!! So very cute!
One thing though - did you try converting it to BW? I think it would look
great as it is quite a high contrast pic...
tan.
Interesting that you should as Chris, cause when I was talking to CR Kennedy
the other day and asking them about an ideal lens to go on my *istD, I said
that I wanted one that produces nice "bokeh" and they too had no idea what I
was talking about (must a genetic thing with the Kennedy name, lol!)!
LOVE it! LOVE it!
VERY cool shot Albano, just the sort of thing that I love! High saturation,
high contrast, great composition...
Very commercial..
Thanks for sharing!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Albano Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2004 3:54 PM
To: PDML
Simon said:
" Hi Tanya, Can't help with any of the istD questions (I don't have one) but
thought write and congratulate you on the photos.
You could have been using anything from a Zenit to a 10mp top-of-the wozza
camera, that's just craft - the art of the photos is wonderful.
Congratulations!
C
hehe, naive little fairygirl thought it was OJ! lol - you know like OJ and
scrambled eggs for brekky...?
hmmm, I should've known it wouldn't be anything so innocent! lol...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 23 February 2004 4:13 PM
OMG - that is friggin' hilarious...!!!
I just forwarded it to all of my ebay addicted friends! It is
so true! lol...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 23 February 2004 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: The ebay anthem
sky
Tanya,
You might enjoy Macallan. If you were nearby, I would take you out and
buy you a glass, or several.
Paul
On Feb 23, 2004, at 8:11 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
> And you men have the hide to say that us women talk alot of
> crap...
>
> You are the MASTERS of digr
re all the rage
this year. This string has me laughing out loud, something I needed today.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-----
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Ooops, typo, maybe some of those whisky fumes are filtering through to me...
I MEANT to say this:
"It has been said to ME on many ocassions "why don't you just try one, you
might even like it?"
not
"It has been said to BE on many ocassions "why don't you just try one, you
might even like it?"
Well, personally, I'd be disappointed if I logged on each morning and had
like two PDML emails I love the high volume, it is like a big party
going 24-7. It is quite simple really, just delete those messages that are
irrelevant to you.
And I totally agree with Shel on this one, lets all just
Dave, I totally hear ya mate! I was feeling rather "blue" after seeing the
results of my WB fiasco the other day! Very wild indeed, and took many
hours to bloody fix in PS! I now officially HATE cyan...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tu
Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I contributed to a bad thing
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography"
Subject: RE: I did a bad thing
> Ok, so SERIOUSLY here - you know how Cesar had
oooh, look at the pretty colours!
NICE bokeh! love it John...!
...nice painting too...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: John Mustarde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW Pastoral at 420mm
Here's a bit of pastoral color:
Hmmm, overall, I really like this shot Bruce. Not sure if it is the colour
or the focus or the combination of them both together.
Generally, I don't like soft focus and soft focus filters for wedding
photography as it often results in images that look very dated (read: 80's),
and overly cheesy,
Mine here in Aus. is orange - very retro! lol...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 8:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MZ6/ZXL/MZL LCD color back light
Hello,
In France, the MZ6 has an orange back light color.
B
hehe, the challenge is on!
tan. (who "fondles" AS she photographs)
ps no wise arse comments about "fondling", ok Cotty? hehe.
Actually, I am GLAD that it happened when it did - it has set the precedent
and I now know that I will NEVER make the mistake again...
(I hope! lol)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 7:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
niiice...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Simon King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT- Timely Recycle, with some edits
LOL
http://www.photowebs.com/pssf/images/Thornburg/LIGHT%20BULB.jpg
Only 26 to go...
Subject: Re: I contributed to a bad thing
I think a small fairy on your bottom would be most excellent
On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:25 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
> bugger casual, if you're gonna do it, why not go the whole hog...
>
> ...maybe some fishnet stockings...
>
> ...or s
W
I sometimes fondle as I photograph. That does make it a lot more fun
.
Paul
(I'm not Cotty:-)
On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:36 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
>
> hehe, the challenge is on!
>
> tan. (who "fondles" AS she photographs)
>
> ps no wise arse comments about "fondling", ok Cotty? hehe.
>
Wendy, I am so not into dog portraits, but you do them well. The lighting
and saturation of this shot is beautiful. It is incredibly sharp, and the
black backdrop (even with doggy pee! lol) contrasts really nicely with the
reds. Tanja has a lovely expression too. As I said, doggy portraits are
COMPLETELY OT, BUT everytime I see a post come through with this subject
line, I keep thinking you are talking about me! ie "Tan". I keep seeing it
and thinking "what? I'm not Canadian!" lol...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 Fe
Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 3:30 PM
To: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: Re: PAW - My first
Hello Tanya,
In the photos I made for her, I cloned those out. Of course, a major
hard drive meltdown a few weeks back caused me to lose those images.
I didn&
It looks like a display case? of sorts that is clear perspex and lit from
the inside. You can see the reflection on his glasses and it is clearly
providing the lighting on his face...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004
Sorry Bill, but with respect, I have to agree with Lasse here. I too, felt
that the shot appeared to be too dark. It is kind of "muddy" on my screen
which is callibrated sRGB.
I have done very similar tight crops on many occasions and love to "break"
the rules, but for some reason, whether it b
OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and "that bloody photography
list". I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot
is "safe"! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and
meeting with a bunch of "internet stalkers", lol, his words, not mine!
You
ops, i've been discovered...
Ok, so I couldn't keep my mouth shut could i?
Well, here's the deal...
I am pre-registered for GFM
I am NOT bothering with my sister and her whole wedding fiasco, I basically
told her and my mum to "go jump"...
I have kept the dates free in my diary
OMG!! How funny...!
This one is the best...
http://www.electric-chicken.co.uk/oldoryoung.html
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 9:53 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: OT: The new product range from Apple...
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL
That is a cool shot Shel...
You know what I don't think there is even that many cars in my entire town!
lol
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Not exactly PAW: Sunny Californ
Yaaay, come and visit me!!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 12:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: in da streets
> -Original Message-
> From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> tv,
>
> Maybe we ca
Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Frank's bunny ears, I think I'll be
pretty safe. Unless that is, Cotty squashes me in the back of tv's car on
the drive to GFM!
hehe...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 12:45
Just something to make you all smile...
Again, my dad sent this to me...
Very clever and some of them take a bit to work out, but hilarious!
I love #7 and #16! hehe.
tan.
PS no offence to any Chinese PDML'ers, just a bit of fun!
Subject: FW: Chinese for dummies
For all you fast learners.
sn't help now! lol).
tan.
-Original Message-
From: David Miers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: GFM
I don't know about Australian law, but a tax write off?
-----Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photogr
LOL! Good "pick up" Mike, I totally missed that one!
Well, you can all breath easy for a few days as I am off to Brisbane again
in a couple of hours, probably won't post again till Sunday, BUT will get to
meet up with Ryan Lee and John Coyle in the meantime, so I'll have some pics
to post!
tan.
GREAT shots Dario, not too sure about the music though! Kinda gave me a
headache after a while, although are you trying to tease us by saying "Wish
you were here"?
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 7:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
Katrin...
I am no landscape photographer but...
Despite the initial impact of the image and the fact that I do like it
overall, I really think it lacks "something" due to the blown out sky and
reflections on the water. Pardon the pun, but there is really no "depth" to
the water. There are no ri
Cotty, I am yet to book flights but there is plenty of availability around
the dates that I want. I am looking at flying in around the 27th May - tv
has some work around the 30th that I was going to tag along for and
generally just check things out for the week before GFM. Was hoping to
squeeze
know what I "achieve",
thanks so much for the suggestion!!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 7:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GFM
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[E
Love this shot Mark!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 1 March 2004 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW beacuse I missed the PUG
I didn't get my portrait shot in to the PUG by deadline so I'll present
it as a PAW image.
http://ww
Hi Everyone!
This is a quick one for me as I am working to deadlines and I am extremely
rushed.
I will be sure to come back later and post properly, but I just felt really
rude as you have all been making such lovely comments about my PUG shot.
I too love the shot, and Frank, it was the freakin'
The Newspaper deadline I was talking about? I got a front page
I got home from Brisbane at midnight on Sunday night - there was a message
waiting for me from some Mining Union guy, asking if I could attend a picket
line and industrial dispute the following morning (yesterday).
I was to phot
A big thankyou to all of you kind, considerate people who took it upon
yourselves to notice that I wrote to Wendy about the spelling of my name and
how I preferred it.
I have noticed you all taking the trouble to spell it correctly and I really
do appreciate it...!
Actually, now that I think abo
Cotty - it's not harsh at all! Just realistic is all... I totally agree with
what you are saying - just gotta learn to be a "hard-nosed" business woman,
instead of a "struggling artist type"...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2004 7:37
LOL - yeah John- gotta post about it yet! And I sent everything off
yesterday to be repaired and only remembered AFTER the fact that I hadn't
taken any pics of it in all it's little pieces!
Anyway thanks heaps for the kind words!
tan.
That's terrific Tanja, well done - particularly after such
Boros, did you really shoot these with 15 and 10 second exposures?!?! If
you did, they are incredibly sharp!!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Boros Attila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2004 1:42 AM
To: PDML
Subject: PAW - Tabletop shots
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/
OK
LOL @ Keith!
No Keith - your pronounciation would've been almost correct. It is actually
pronounced "Tarn-ya" or "Ten-ya" to the Aussie lingo-ists.
The story goes that my actual birth name is spelt Tanja, but here in Oz,
most locals (who don't usually have a wonderful grasp of correct English
g
LOL! Thanks for the heads up Treena! And thanks to everyone else for your
kind words of congratulations and advise. I am GETTING there re: the money
thing and charging etc, so I am duly noting it all down in the great big
notepad in my head! Don't forget I am only just getting used to the conce
LOL! now, a change of subject PUH-lease
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2004 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Just wanted to say...
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Yep, Chris, so do I! BUT, when I met John Coyle - I noticed that he
pronounced it "Say-zar"...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2004 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Name pronounciation was RE: Just wanted to say...
large businesses. ISP's don't use Exchange servers
for email because they are too easy to hack, cost too much money, and
require much bigger machines than running POP3 servers. run Windows Update
from your Start Menu and it takes care of everything automatically.
Herb
- Origina
Many thanks Boris!
I am starting to get used to it now! lol. At least my insurance covers it
all!
Thanks for your good wishes,
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2004 5:55 AM
To: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: Re: One very
give
enough movement/vibration to cause softness in the image.
Anyway, they are really sharp, so you must being doing all the right things!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Boros Attila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2004 5:19 PM
To: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: Re[2
You are most very welcome Derby! I aim to please!
I am starting to realise that the "hurt equipment" thing is all part and
parcel of what I do and it is all insured, it is just the inconvenience that
is a PIA.
BTW, that shot of the Harbour bridge on your home page is just breath
taking!
tan.
-
DagT,
cool pic, but what the heck is it??
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Dag T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2004 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW #3 - Winter
I shouldn´t, because I haven´t had time to look at your photos, but
http://www.photo.net/phot
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2004 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW #3 - Winter
Does it matter :-)
It is a tree and a round table with about 50cm snow on top of it...
DagT
På 6. mar. 2004 kl. 09.17 skrev Tanya Mayer Photography:
> DagT,
>
> cool pic, but what the h
Oh, no ERN, you're a trekkie?!?!?
*eek*
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 7 March 2004 1:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: About my name
Bob W. quoted Mr Boros as follows:
> > Somebody pointed out that it would be much
You're a meanie, Cotty.. hehe!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 7 March 2004 4:55 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: OT - eBay advice saught
O noble eBay experts,
I have sold a lens - but as you will see the auction clearly stated that
it was UK only
David, I strongly disagree here!
It is a fabulous shot, and the focus is just great. The way the light falls
on said collar and boutonniere assists the focus, with the end result
definitely "working".
Love it. Thanks for sharing!
tan.
>
>This photo teaches me that I do not focus well in the
And now for the onslaught of questions...
Can someone explain to me exactly how RAW works? I understand that it gives
you a file that is captured exactly as you see it, without colour
correction, compression etc. Does this also mean that the
contrast/saturation/sharpness/noise reduction setting
trying to
beat each other to the best explanation* lol!
tan.
-Original Message-----
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 7 March 2004 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fairygirl has discovered RAW...
And now for the onslaught of questions...
Can someo
Great shot Steve! I love cows! Must post some of mine one time...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 8 March 2004 2:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: How Now Brown Cow?
I got this during a buccolic sojurn last week:
http://ho
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 8 March 2004 5:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What gear is on your "lust list" ?
I think the Epson 2200 will give you prints that are quite "sellable"
for around $500 US. Of course you're limited to 13x18.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2004, at 1:01 PM
you tell me , where can I get FA100 Macro for $300 ???
same time, DVD burners go for around 150 nowadays.
BR, [EMAIL PROTECTED] just bought a burner & dreamin' about FA100/2.8 Macro
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
> I have a "wish list" taped next to my computer monitor to keep
trait pics?
They look very nice on my monitor. Nice range of shadow and highlight.
Good job. Attractive couple.
On Mar 7, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
>
> A few weeks ago...
>
> Well, here are some that I took today...
>
> The first gallery is a couple, the
I love it Chris, with just one small thing...
The tree to the left looks a bit strange due to it actually being taller
than the skyscrapers, for me, it puts the perspective out a little. Maybe
(I'm not sure where you were standing), you could have moved a little more
to the right to not include t
Cory, the link doesn't work for me...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 8 March 2004 7:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Very late March PUG offering :)
Here's my portrait for the March PUG. I can never seem to get them in on
ti
ECTED]
Sent: Monday, 8 March 2004 11:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What gear is on your "lust list" ?
That price sounds HIGH to me. Way high. How big do you want this thing
to print? 16x20 inches?
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
> I have a "wish list" taped next to
Paul, you said: "On *istD the shutter has to be open at least 1/125 to synch
with the flash..."
I totally don't get this. I shoot with mine right down to a second
sometimes, and the sync speed goes up to 1/150.
Can you explain what you mean by this?
tan
-Original Message-
From: Paul St
How funny! I'm the total opposite, I prefer to slow it right down to
CAPTURE ambient light and if I don't want it around, I usually shoot at
night time.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:36 AM
To: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: R
Gorgeous, there is nothing more to be said.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - KW's third
I heard you Steve, Paul & greywolf - take a look now - its bigger
Thanks for takin
Lasse, I really like these shots, despite what others have been posting
about the shadows etc. Yep, in hindsight they may have been improved with
some fill flash or a reflector, BUT the shadows also add an element of
interest to the shot, and I think that that is important too.
Gosh, she is so p
Erm, excuse me, but did somebody say my name...?
How the heck did I get in here?!?!
lol!
Well, here goes...
I haven't been following this thread, and it is ironic really as the reason
is exactly what you are all discussing. It was simply above my "need" for
technical learning... In fact, I
Har! You should see how many I deleted to come up with these!
Really not that impressive, I have seen much much better and so far I
haven't had any "bites" from the newspapers I've sent them to this morning!
lol, oh, well, got lottsa 12 year old girls phoning me wanting to buy them
though! lol..
That is a fantastic shot! Ultra sharp and beautiful exposure. The
composition is extremely interesting.
Great job!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2004 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW: guitar
I just thought
hi guys,
just posting a link to a gallery of kid portraits that I shot yesterday for
those who asked about portraits and the *istD. The lighting was ideal for
this shoot and the results were much, much better than the couple that I
posted the other day.
This little girl is a very unusual looki
Boris wrote:
"Tanya, with all due respect, I do think that the tree actually makes the
shot. Which I wrote in my comments I believe. It is light, tree
and city - three components, not less.
I hope I am not breaking any rules here by countering someone else's
opinion... If I do, I apologize in ad
very nice shots! Please explain how you select lenses i.e. 90mm through
200mm seem to produce good portraits in the right situation. You mention
200mm for safe distance. Which others did you use?
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &q
501 - 600 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
