Title: RE: POP or SMTP
"Is there anybody out there?" --Pink Floyd
Perhaps, you couldn't understand my bad English! :( but it isn't my native language...you may ask "what do you mean?" at least?
Thanks.
Ilker G.
>-Original Message-
>From: R.Ilker Gokhan
>Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 200
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 06:32:58PM +0300, R.Ilker Gokhan wrote:
> My branch offices have slow links about 24.4 kbit.
clear.
> So i have to use lots effective their net link.
You mean "i have to use the bandwidth efficiently"?
> i will install mail server on brach office to communicate mai
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 11:57:11AM +0300, Mulindwa Eric wrote:
> I have an interesting scenerion, whereby I send mail to user and the mail
> is not in the user's mailbox, what do U think could be the problem, and
> also when I check in the maillog I see an error msg saying :
> Yikes!Could_create_
Title: RE: POP or SMTP
>
>> So i have to use lots effective their net link.
>
>You mean "i have to use the bandwidth efficiently"?
>
>
>> i will install mail server on brach office to communicate main
>it depends, unfortunately.
>Having an own email server per branch is quite useful if ther
"Peter Samuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2 May 2000, Kins Orekhov wrote:
> > ...
> > So, what we have is:
> >
> > 1999-11-24 17:43:07.542160 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> >
> > but matchup needs:
> >
> > 957284032.988038 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> > ...
> I have a patch fo
On Tue, 2 May 2000, John White wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 12:25:14PM -0500, Jeff Hayward wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 May 2000, Gareth Harper wrote:
> >
> > 1) His first requirement was to only allow relaying if the user had one
> > of his hosted domains as the From: line of an email. I've tol
qmail Digest 3 May 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 990
Topics (messages 40820 through 40917):
Re: qmail pop3 problem
40820 by: BlackStains
40821 by: BlackStains
40823 by: Chris Johnson
Mail purge
40822 by: Mulindwa Eric
40828 by: Uwe Ohse
40859 by: Mul
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 11:41:47AM +0300, R.Ilker Gokhan wrote:
> Thanks for replies.
> which protocol should i use to establish communication between branch office
> and the main office so that using the bandwith becomes more effectively?
It does not really matter. The bandwidth requirements ar
"J.M. Roth \(iip\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok well, what do you mean with "mimic sendmail".
>A customer asked me to point out to him all the options of our mail sending
>tool for use in his cgi progs.
>I'm not sure what to say...
# grep usage: sendmail.c
substdio_putsflush(subfderr,"sendm
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 08:33:44AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> >Ok well, what do you mean with "mimic sendmail".
> >A customer asked me to point out to him all the options of our mail sending
> >tool for use in his cgi progs.
> >I'm not sure what to say...
Or else, you might want to introduce your
Mulindwa Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 2 May 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> Mulindwa Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >I have an interesting scenerion, whereby I send mail to user and the mail
>> >is not in the user's mailbox, what do U think could be the problem, and
>> >also when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I realise that it is a memory leak - but how can it be fixed???
1) You can analyze the source code of the patch, identify the leak,
and fix it,
2) You can ask the author of the patch if he's aware of the problem
and/or has a fix, or
3) You can hire a competant pro
bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What I really mean is I can't send out mail remotely... say to my
>mother-in-law for instance.
Right, and you think that's a *problem*? :-)
But seriously, what happens when you try to send remote mail? What Do
The Logs Say(tm)?
-Dave
Mario Rafael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could anybody help me with this error message?... I DONT know what the
>problem is.. :(
>
>May 3 03:05:56 svr1 qmail: 957315956.028582 new msg 205816
>May 3 03:05:56 svr1 qmail: 957315956.061896 info msg 205816: bytes 7612
>from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> also when I check in the maillog I see an error msg saying :
> Yikes!Could_create_but_cant_delete_temperory_file!!/ENOENT:pat
> h_doesnot_exist
> What could be the prob.
Check his .qmail file. He's probably trying to run mail through a
misconfigured filter; as someone already noted, th
Dave Sill wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I realise that it is a memory leak - but how can it be fixed???
>
> 1) You can analyze the source code of the patch, identify the leak,
>and fix it,
> 2) You can ask the author of the patch if he's aware of the problem
>and/or has a fix
qmail does not ever print an error message like Yikes!
just look at the code and you can see that.
the user MUST have some type of .qmail that tells it some other type of
delivery message, this has been pointed out once before, please do not
continue to send this to the list.
-Original Mess
Am using procmail
Eric
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Uwe Ohse wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 11:57:11AM +0300, Mulindwa Eric wrote:
>
> > I have an interesting scenerion, whereby I send mail to user and the mail
> > is not in the user's mailbox, what do U think could be the problem, and
> > also when I
Hello. I just installed qmail, and I was going through and testing
deliveries. Local to local works fine, but when I try to send mail out, I
get this:
---
May 2 09:54:55 oldbd qmail: 957275695.455731 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
May 2 10:01:36 oldbd qmail: 957276096.455387 starting delivery 1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello. I just installed qmail,
How? Source RPM, source tarball, or binary RPM?
>And if I try to execute qmail-remote by hand, I get a seg. fault, no core
>dumped.
That's bad, especially if that binary was built on that system.
qmail-remote is not known to crash.
-D
My qmail system is working perfectly so now it's time to muck with it. ;-)
Perhaps I am missing it in the documentation, but I have gone through the
man pages and FAQ's and am still uncertain how to setup the user accounts
to access qmail-pop3d using the apop protocol. I want to disable pop and
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:27:32AM -0400, Nat Fellows wrote:
> Hello. I just installed qmail, and I was going through and testing
> deliveries. Local to local works fine, but when I try to send mail out, I
> get this:
>
[snip]
> May 2 10:01:36 oldbd qmail: 957276096.473584 delivery 16: deferral:
I find it amazing what corp enviroments ask IT to do instead of confronting
a user on specific issues, but I was told to look into it.
I have a particular user who is abusing the mail system with improper
mailings to friends. We use email internally for everyone as a wonderful
means of contact an
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 11:04:53AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
>
> That's bad, especially if that binary was built on that system.
> qmail-remote is not known to crash.
>
Erm... I had a crashing qmail-remote a few weeks ago. But that was due to a hardware
problem :-)
Anyway... the fact is... When
Probably you've already gotten this response, but sqwebmail only works
with maildirs.
On Tue, 2 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> I stand corrected. Dave Sill also pointed out that any web front end tool, like
> sqwebmail, requires the use of mbox format in a central spool director
dd - Thank you!
I assume it is inetd. However I moved qmail to be after inetd
it didn't get qmail started either upon reboot.
BTW, I have following lines in the /etc/inetd.conf:
smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail -smtpd
-
I have a client that is very unwisely using his
email server as a sort of FTP server where people are sending him very large
attachments. His mailbox size is about 250 megabytes and he receives emails
daily that are about 10 - 25 megabytes big (I told him not to do this and to
simply use FTP
Dear netters,
I'm newbie in Qmail world. I've installed Qmail 1.03 & fastforward
0.51 under SGI O2/IRIX 6.3.
But I didn't find in docs and FAQ an answers to few questions about
local mail delivery.
1) Is it possible (and how) to setup Qmail and fastforward
for work with /bin/mail
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Zhiliang Hu wrote:
>
> dd - Thank you!
>
> I assume it is inetd. However I moved qmail to be after inetd
> it didn't get qmail started either upon reboot.
>
> BTW, I have following lines in the /etc/inetd.conf:
>
> smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env
Certainly Maildir with qmail-pop3d will help here, though it
should be noted that many clients don't cope well if a download
exceeds a certain time such as the time between mailbox checks.
Most of the pop servers that work on mbox format mailboxes have
to scan the whole file searching for "^From
On Tue, 2 May 2000, John White wrote:
Jeff, if you read into the statement just a bit, you'll realize that
the boss is asking for something much worse: denying relaying from
valid IPs which don't present the ISPs domain in the envelope sender.
The sentence is ambiguous; it admits the p
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Jeroen ten Berge wrote:
??? I have the message ID's in my log !
I was referring to the message-id: header from the mail message, not the
inode number that qmail uses. Sendmail logs the message-id: header as
written in the mail message.
I have sometimes wished qmail did
> > BTW, I have following lines in the /etc/inetd.conf:
> >
> > smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
> > /var/qmail/bin/qmail -smtpd
>
> You don't have a space between qmail and -smtpd, do you?
No space.
Sorry, when I copied and pasted it into mail I left a spac
My /var/qmail/rc file looks like this:
#! /bin/sh
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start '|dot-forward .forward
./Maildir/'
My /etc/skel looks like this
Maildir
- cur
- new
- tmp
Mailbox
mbox
PROBLEM: Qmail delivers to the file Mailbox, and when a user checks his
e-m
Is anyone using Krzysztof Dabrowski's cmd5checkpw with qmail-pop3d?
Yes, I know that he didn't write it for that, he wrote it for
smtp-auth. But it looks to me like he's reversed the password and the
timestamp parameters to checkpassword.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.c
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Ohiomoba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Steffan Hoeke; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Web front-end to mail service
>
> Probably you've already gotten this response, but sqwebmail onl
Russell Nelson writes:
> Is anyone using Krzysztof Dabrowski's cmd5checkpw with qmail-pop3d?
> Yes, I know that he didn't write it for that, he wrote it for
> smtp-auth. But it looks to me like he's reversed the password and the
> timestamp parameters to checkpassword.
Answering my own quest
At 20:06 2000-05-03, Russell Nelson wrote:
>Is anyone using Krzysztof Dabrowski's cmd5checkpw with qmail-pop3d?
>Yes, I know that he didn't write it for that, he wrote it for
>smtp-auth. But it looks to me like he's reversed the password and the
>timestamp parameters to checkpassword.
;)
Isn't i
Tim--
I have a suggestion for you. But first, I think that you should look at the
real implications of the request, that is if this starts for one employee
you can be sure there will be others.
Try a second installation of qmail on another box with the relaying turned
off, allow it to route to
Is anyone on this list capable of English to German translation of a
technical paper approx. 7 pages in length. If so, email me off list. I can
pay about $100 USD for it.
Anyone who is fluent should whack this out in about 1.5 hours.
Thanks
Greg
I have succesfully switch the incoming e-mails to use Maildir instead of
Mailbox or mbox, my problem remaining is when a user retrieves his e-mail
from a POP client, he gets no e-mail..which programs delivers e-mail to
clients is it pop3d?
I need to make qmail deliver whatever is in Maildir/n
I have a feeling I am not the only one confused.
I assume you changed your default delivery method to ./Maildir/ which will
put mails in your ./Maildir/new/ directory.
If you are trying to retrieve mails from there now with pop, you need
qmail-pop3d or any other program that can read /Maildir/'s
Hi everybody,
I installed qmail (v. 1.03 running on Solaris 2.6 for x86 - JUST !
(without any patches)) with tcpwrapper ucspi-0.88 and multilog from
daemontools package (v. 0.70) all them compiled with gcc 2.95.2 running
in 4 machines PIII - 500Mhz with 256mb RAM. In my DNS I have
smtp.ig.com.br
qmail-pop3d is installed in my computer, my problem is how do I configure it
to deliver from Maildir instead of mbox (right now it works with mbox)?
Thanks for replying...
Bolivar,
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bolivar Diaz Galarza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1999-11-24 17:43:07.542160 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> >
> > but matchup needs:
> >
> > 957284032.988038 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> Russ Allebury has a similar patch.
Yes, I have tried that and it didn't work for me.
Comments for tai64nfrac says:
Expects the input stream
What you're asking is not very difficult -- especially if you use tcpservers.
First however, it's important to note what your current network looks like.
In the case of a local network that's firewalled to the internet, you can simply use
RELAYCLIENT= and a shellscript .
simply change your smt
Any way to get qmail to handle mbx format?
- Steve
Is it possible to have qmail forward email destined to one address, to
another address instead, if it contains certain file attachments based on
file extension?
jason
Kins Orekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I have tried that and it didn't work for me.
> Comments for tai64nfrac says:
>
> Expects the input stream to be a sequence of lines beginning with @ (1), a
> timestamp in external TAI64N format, and a space. Replaces the @ and the
> timesta
Sometimes I write a SQL statement in MySQL that may encompass several lines
(which ends in a semicolon of course). Anyway, let's say I wrote a line,
pressed enter and realized I made a mistake. Is there any way to erase that
previous line and retype it?
What is the best mysql GUI for Linux in your opinion? I heard good things
about Kmysql, but I don't want to try it and realize it sucks. Just
wondering what your opinions on it. I am using Microsoft Access right now,
but would prefer a Linux alternative.
- Steve
Rumor has it that Gregory J. Forkin may have mentioned these words:
>Tim--
>I have a suggestion for you. But first, I think that you should look at the
>real implications of the request, that is if this starts for one employee
>you can be sure there will be others.
I agree with Gregory on being
> You've already run the logs through tai64nlocal. That converts the
> TAI64 timestamp into human readable form. Don't do that. Leave the
> multilog output alone and then run it through tai64nfrac (or
> tai64nunix) and it will generate timestamps suitable for qmailanalog.
Now, I'm really confused
From: "Steve Quezadas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 16:26:07 -0700
Any way to get qmail to handle mbx format?
- Steve
If this is "mbox" format, it's trivial (see "man dot-qmail"). If this
is something else, we need a better reference.
Hello,
I have a user who is spamming. Is there a way to stop qmail and delete
everything from the queue? Thanks.
> I've wrote a small awk-script to accomplish this, but it doesn't work with
> big files on my machine (more then 440-445 lines), and I can't figure out
> why (if someone has suggestions/recommendations, please, let me know):
>
> This script does the trick for me. Again, originally I was for such
Why not just nuke the user?
clifford thurber wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a user who is spamming. Is there a way to stop qmail and delete
> everything from the queue? Thanks.
--
NEEDHAM'S ELECTRONICS
Device Programmers
(916) 924-8037 (Voice)
(916) 924-8065 (Fax)
4630 Beloit Drive, #20
Sacramento, C
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Kins Orekhov wrote:
> > You've already run the logs through tai64nlocal. That converts the
> > TAI64 timestamp into human readable form. Don't do that. Leave the
> > multilog output alone and then run it through tai64nfrac (or
> > tai64nunix) and it will generate timestamps su
mbx is the name of a format that UW-IMAP supports. It's an
all-messages-in-one-file database format file. It's not as ugly as mbox where
all the messages are concatenated together (which requires so much
re-organization when doing IMAP access), but the file is really a kind of
database with the m
Dave Sill wrote:
> bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >What I really mean is I can't send out mail remotely... say to my
> >mother-in-law for instance.
>
> Right, and you think that's a *problem*? :-)
>
> But seriously, what happens when you try to send remote mail? What Do
> The Logs Say(tm)?
>
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 08:57:38AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >What I really mean is I can't send out mail remotely... say to my
> >mother-in-law for instance.
>
> Right, and you think that's a *problem*? :-)
>
> But seriously, what happens when you try to send
hi folks,
I've installed qMail for my office server and it
runs fine - delivers mails and all that jazz. However, I'm getting only external
mails out, and internal mails to users' mailboxes seem to die. Using
/var/qmail/bin/makemaildir, I created a Maildir for myself in my home dir
/home/i
Hi,
How can I setup email to ignore all messages that cannot be delivered,
i.e., even not to bother the re-delievery and bounce?
Thank you for help.
Sincerely,
Peter Li
I suppose you could set queuelifetime to 1 second. This will fail
permanently if delivery fails on the second delivery (or possibly the first,
depending on how busy your machine is.) If you want to kill every email on
the first deferral you will need to write a patch.
--Adam
On Wed, May 03, 20
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Isaiah Chua wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> I've installed qMail for my office server and it runs fine - delivers mails and all
>that jazz. However, I'm getting only external mails out, and internal mails to users'
>mailboxes seem to die. Using /var/qmail/bin/makemaildir, I created
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 02:16:22PM +1000, Peter Samuel wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2000, Isaiah Chua wrote:
>
> > hi folks,
> >
> > I've installed qMail for my office server and it runs fine - delivers mails and
>all that jazz. However, I'm getting only external mails out, and internal mails to
>us
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 02:16:22PM +1000, Peter Samuel wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 May 2000, Isaiah Chua wrote:
> >
> > > hi folks,
> > >
> > > I've installed qMail for my office server and it runs fine - delivers mails and
>all that jazz. However, I'm gettin
Oh, sorry.. I misread. I thought you said "use qmaild"..
--Adam
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 02:29:23PM +1000, Peter Samuel wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 02:16:22PM +1000, Peter Samuel wrote:
> > > On Thu, 4 May 2000, Isaiah Chua wrote:
> > >
> >
hi folks,
I keep getting this error message when trying to
send mails to my new qmail server at the office:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at
mail.twc-sg.com.I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the
following addresses.This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it
> The problem is the fact that I'm having too much defunct process.
> Usually I have between 350-500 process running by machine. From that,
> normally I have between 90-120 defunct process per machine.
Do they stay forever, or do they go away?
Which qmail process is the parent?
I have seen Sol
Anyone knows what this means and if there's any
corrective action I should take?
May 4 13:43:09 mail qmail: 957418989.903703
delivery 518: deferral:
Uh-oh:_.qmail_has_file_delivery_but_has_x_bit_set._(#4.7.0)/
Thanks!
Best regards,
Isaiah ChuaOfficial Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM Ni
It means it has the execute bit set. If you do chmod 600 .qmail-whatever it
will probably be fine That will make the file readable and writeable by it's
owner, with no permissions for anyone else. You may want to find a reference
on basic unix file system permissions.
jason
> Anyone knows what
72 matches
Mail list logo
