hi
i have installed qmail 1.03 on redhat 6.2
i would like to know , what are the patches to be patch with this.
for more secure and with out any holes
could some one guide me what are the patches to be apply
thanks advance
_
Do You Ya
Hello :
I can't understand some files in /var/qmail/control directory.
Example: defaultdomain, locals, me, Any different?
if I want to add domain ,how to do?
Thank you.
Hello :
I can't understand some files in /var/qmail/control directory.
Example: defaultdomain, locals, me, Any different?
if I want to add domain ,how to do?
Thank you.
Hello :
I can't understand some files in /var/qmail/control directory.
Example: defaultdomain, locals, me, Any different?
if I want to add domain ,how to do?
Thank you.
there is no need to patch qmail 1.03 to make it more secure,
cos it already is very secure. Nobody found any hole up 'till
now.
check http://www.qmail.org to see if you would patch it for
extra features.
Grtz,
Arjen.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, hari_bhr wrote:
> hi
>
> i have installed qmail 1.
George,
there is a lot of qmail documentation out there, that will give
you perfect explanation of many many qmail aspects.
On http://qmail.3va.net for example, you will find the online manpages,
and on
http://qmail.3va.net/man/man5/qmail-control.html
is the answer to your question.
also rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you are installing on RH 6.2 just install the RPM made by Bruce,
I'v Added some patches to daemontools etc you can find the src rpm's here with a
little howto
http://www.quint.be/projects/
Willy De la Court
Quint NS NV
On Thursday, June 07, 2001
Hello all.
I am niebie to qmail but untill now i am happy.
I have some questions :
I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
/home/username.
Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
Another thing
Did you use the form user@domain as login?
I mean
telnet server 110
+OK
user utente@domain
+OK
pass password
Remember, when using vpopmail you have to use user@domain as login, instead
of user.
---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Te
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Constantine Koulis wrote:
> I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
> When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
> /home/username.
> Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
Yes it is. I think you should first tell us
Hi,
>
>
> I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
> When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
> /home/username.
> Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
this depends on your configuration, in most cases it is
hint: link /var/spool/mail/u
* Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010606 20:44]:
> I've got this in my queue:
Your patched qmail-smtpd seems to have a buffer overflow problem. Vis:
--- snip ---
$ telnet 216.30.106.234 25
Trying 216.30.106.234...
Connected to 216.30.106.234.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 austin-jump.virci
I would like to know why i can receive emails from the internet using pine
with the user X and from the OUtlook Express lets say using again user X
dont receive anything..
>From: "Tom Beer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Constantine Koulis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: "qmail list" <[EMAIL P
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Constantine Koulis wrote:
> Dear sir.
>
> About local delivery i can send from root to local users but from local
> users to root nothing.As well i can send from local users and root to
> outside world.
Where is mail for your local users stored?
Do you check ~alias/ for
I set up Qmail and It's ok.
When i'm setting up vpopmail i haven't Virtual
domain and assign.
I've created an empty assign file.
When I try to add the user postmaster it
tells that the domain doesn't exist(using vadduser)
when i try to add the domain(using vadddomain)
it tells that th
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:24:16PM +0530, hari_bhr wrote:
> i would like to know , what are the patches to be patch with this.
> for more secure and with out any holes
> could some one guide me what are the patches to be apply
Not a single one.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www
"Troy Settle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For the last several months, I've been having some severe problems with
>qmail-remote. I've rebuilt from fresh sources and updated my system
>(FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE) several times. Nothing seems to help. You can see
>what I'm seeing at http://home.psknet.
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010607 12:59]:
> * Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010606 20:44]:
> > I've got this in my queue:
> Your patched qmail-smtpd seems to have a buffer overflow problem. Vis:
And attached is the confirmation.
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net
"Joshua Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> what is the space for /
>> what is the space for /boot
>> what is the space for /home
>> what is the space for /usr
>> what is the space for /var
>> what is the space for /swap
>> what is the space for /tmp
How 20th century...
>If you use Red Hat,
do a phpinfo() from your browser, and see what is sendmail_path configured to
if it is sendmail -t -i
that is your problem.
the sendmail wrapper of qmail does not take all options that sendmail takes.
remove all options and then it should work.
shashi joshi
--- Joel Uckelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED
"hari_bhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i would like to know , what are the patches to be patch with this.
>for more secure and with out any holes
>could some one guide me what are the patches to be apply
Any patches you apply are more likely to decrease security than
improve it. (No offense inte
Thus spake Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Er, what's the chance of have a ps which compares qmail-popd,
> qmail-smtp and qmail-remote then? Kinda relevant doncha think?
You are right. This is a diet libc pop3:
USER PID %CPU %MEM SIZE RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
leitner 3232 0.4
Hello,
I encountered very veird problem with qmail-remote hanging
indefinitelly (for over 2 weeks). Here are the details:
qmail-remote stays in ESTABLESHED state forever.
strace show that qmail-remote hangs doing: 'read(3,'
Most of hanged qmail remote are trying to deliver to outblaze.com
(or
On Thursday 07 June 2001 16:00, Dave Sill wrote:
> /boot20MB
> /var 300MB min, 800MB better, more for servers
> /2GB or more (include /usr and /tmp)
> /homewhatever you need
> swap 500MB or more
In a mail server this fails when you get a mail which is larger than
I've got a slightly old set of qmail-ldap patches. I guess I'd better upgrade!
Thanks.
Chris
> From: Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:43:04 +0200
>
> * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010607 12:59]:
> > * Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010606 20:44
> =
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In a mail server this fails when you get a mail which is larger than the
>available size on /var. Thus, have AT LEAST 4GB for /var, then you SHOULD be
>safe. Same goes with /home if you deliver mail locally.
You really have users sending multigigabyt
Sorry for the delay (family occasion).
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:46:11AM -0400, Troy Settle wrote:
> RAM is also fine. Out of 256MB, I generally have 20-30mb free
Aaah...not the amount but the quality. Have you _tested_ the RAM?
> Anything else worth looking at?
I assume you managed to rea
I have been requested to make a change to one of my qmail servers [see
below], though I am unsure of how to do this.
Also, can anyone confirm that there is an RFC stating that a CR is a LF?
TIA,
../mk
-Original Message-
Subject:Mail server config
Could your mail relay/server
Hello,
I have been playing with qmail for a while now,
I have been using a pop before smtp (ugg) solution for remote users
I noticed in ports, a qmail-tls package (FreeBSD 4.3 system)
Last night, I installed this package on a mock-up server but have been
unable to
get it working with clie
* Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010607 10:28]:
> > /var 300MB min, 800MB better, more for servers
> In a mail server this fails when you get a mail which is larger than the
> available size on /var. Thus, have AT LEAST 4GB for /var, then you SHOULD be
> safe. Same goes with /home if
I'm using Qmail + Vpomail + Courier-Imap and would
like to enable Acl on mailboxes.
I nedd to enable tree different users(accounts) to
gain access to a single mailbox.
How can i do that?
Thanks, Marco
Hi,
An user is trying to send an email and I see this in log:
2001-06-07 09:13:34.292253500 delivery 21640: deferral:
Connected_to_200.251.234.142_but_my_name_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_501
_dd002.domain.com,_
why_do_you_say_you_are_mail.domain.com?/
The hostname is dd002.domain.co
But qmail doesn't deliver to /var/spool/mail. It delivers to users home
directory as Mailbox or Maildir/new/TIMESTAMP.PID.HOSTNAME ... I thought?
David
Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> On Thursday 07 June 2001 16:00, Dave Sill wrote:
> > /boot20MB
> > /var 300MB min, 800MB better, more for
Unless the network is lying to me again, Henning Brauer said:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:24:16PM +0530, hari_bhr wrote:
> > i would like to know , what are the patches to be patch with this.
> > for more secure and with out any holes
> > could some one guide me what are the patches to be apply
Does anyone know what happened to the qmail-ldap-control patches on
bayour.com?
The directory linked to in the faq is empty. And
bayour.com/qmail/patches_ldap appears to be empty as well. Were the
patches mirrored anywhere? If not, I'd be glad to provide one (as well
as a mirror for qmail.org).
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:38:50AM -0400, Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I encountered very veird problem with qmail-remote hanging
> indefinitelly (for over 2 weeks). Here are the details:
>
> qmail-remote stays in ESTABLESHED state forever.
> strace show that qmail-remote hangs doing:
The qmail/Reiser patch is installed. Besides from reading the text with
that patch it seemed to only be an issue with crash recovery.
More on this today. We modified qmail.c to give separate error messages in
the switch statement for each error condition. Luckily or not we got the
error again
Hello.
I have a running REDHAT linux 7.0 with QMAIL and COURIER on it.I can send
email from my UNIX-USERS but i can receive only using PINE.I mean to POP3 i
dont receive anything using OUTLOOK EXPRESS and by IMAP using squirrelmail
nothing.
Can somebody help me.
___
Marc Knoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been requested to make a change to one of my qmail servers [see
> below], though I am unsure of how to do this.
You could patch qmail to do this, but it's a bad idea. See further info
below.
> Also, can anyone confirm that there is an RFC stating t
>>Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>In a mail server this fails when you get a mail which is larger than the
>>available size on /var. Thus, have AT LEAST 4GB for /var, then you SHOULD
be
>>safe. Same goes with /home if you deliver mail locally.
>
>Dave Sill wrote:
>You really have u
Marc Knoop writes:
> I have been requested to make a change to one of my qmail servers [see
> below], though I am unsure of how to do this.
Probably the best thing to do, to minimize the possible corruption of
email, is to add a /service/smtpdlf, bind to another IP address or
port number, and p
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:57:54AM -0400, peter green wrote:
> If your users are filling a /var partition of 4GB, you (a) handle an
> extraordinary amount of high-latency e-mail, (b) are mismanaging your mail
> server (hint: databytes), and/or (c) you have extremely rude lusers sending
> MP3s and
I'm using Qmail + Vpomail + Courier-Imap and would
like to enable Acl on mailboxes.
I nedd to enable tree different users(accounts) to
gain access to a single mailbox.
How can i do that?
Thanks,
Marco
Hey guys!
Actually, it only takes a few msaccess databases
to get to the gigabyte range, or in my case a couple
of sales people travelling and not picking up mail.
I'm moving to a 5X36gig system for mail from an e450,
once I get the server in. Disk is cheap, why put
artifical limits on the serve
Ari Arantes Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An user is trying to send an email and I see this in log:
>
> 2001-06-07 09:13:34.292253500 delivery 21640: deferral:
> Connected_to_200.251.234.142_but_my_name_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_501
> _dd002.domain.com,_
> why_do_you_say_you_are
Just wondering if this is the complete truth. I think most of the time
memory isn't a problem but CPU is, and I don't see/know if this diet libc is
decreasing CPU load. More concurrency leads to more memory usage but also to
more CPU susage.
Of course I could be wrong here :)
Greets,
Franky
--
Until I get this mess fixed, please cc responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, but it is the only way I can receive email right now.
I seem to have done something to break my qmail. Yesterday afternoon, I
added a virtual user in /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains and put his
forwarding address in a
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:49:58AM -0400, Marc Knoop wrote:
> I have been requested to make a change to one of my qmail servers [see
> below], though I am unsure of how to do this.
Search the archives for 'fixcrio' -- it's intended for just such broken
clients.
>
> Also, can anyone confirm that
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:49:58AM -0400, Marc Knoop wrote:
> I have been requested to make a change to one of my qmail servers [see
> below], though I am unsure of how to do this.
Use fixcrio. Not sure which package it is in.
> Also, can anyone confirm that there is an RFC stating that a CR is
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:58:08AM -0300, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An user is trying to send an email and I see this in log:
>
> 2001-06-07 09:13:34.292253500 delivery 21640: deferral:
> Connected_to_200.251.234.142_but_my_name_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_501
> _dd002.domain.co
> -Original Message-
> From: PUB: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Miércoles 6 de Junio de 2001 20:09
> To: qmail list
> Subject: Re: pop server
>
>
> [snip]
> > PD: I'm not using Maildir
>
> You should!
>
Which are the advantages to use Maildir instead of Mailbox?
Wh
SysAdmin has an article online by some of the top technical people
at Lyris (remember Lyris?):
Title: Which OS is Fastest for High-Performance Network Applications?
http://www.sysadminmag.com/newsletters/feature/
They use their MTA as a comparison tool, and crank it up to
the equvalent of a con
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:28:45AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
[snip]
> To fix this for broken clients, you can use fixcrio, or djb's @fixme/fixup
> solution which feeds to new-inject or qmail-inject to rewrite the message.
@fixme/fixup is not gonna help, because the message is rejected at the
Brian Moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I ocassionally (once a week) am getting:
> > >
> > > qmail-inject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)
[...]
> > > That partition is ReiserFS.
> > Ah -- perhaps the culprit. qmail requires a small patch to run on
> > ReiserFS (it's buri
Until I get this mess fixed, please cc responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry, but it
is the only way I can receive email right now.
I seem to have done something to break my qmail. Yesterday afternoon, I added a
virtual user in /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains and put his forwarding address i
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:05:09AM -0700, Greg White wrote:
> Search the archives for 'fixcrio' -- it's intended for just such broken
> clients.
Ahh. Excellent.
> > Also, can anyone confirm that there is an RFC stating that a CR is a LF?
>
> I think that your word choices here are poor. No RFC
I
would think the easiest way to do this would be:
a)
make a group that the three accounts are part of (if this isn't already in
place)
b)
chgrp the mailbox so that all accounts have access to it
c) set
the MAIL environment variable for all the accounts to point to that
mailbox
voila,
Sorry, but I'm not all comfortable with this...
There's been 4 similar reports of qmail-remote not behaving properly to
this list during the last month.
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg00558.html
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg013
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:00:35AM -0500, Virginia Chism wrote:
> Until I get this mess fixed, please cc responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry, but it is the only way I can receive email right now.
>
> I seem to have done something to break my qmail. Yesterday afternoon, I
> added a virtual use
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, peter green wrote:
> If your users are filling a /var partition of 4GB, you (a) handle an
> extraordinary amount of high-latency e-mail, (b) are mismanaging your mail
> server (hint: databytes), and/or (c) you have extremely rude lusers sending
> MP3s and whatnot through the sy
* GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010607 14:05]:
> > > PD: I'm not using Maildir
> > You should!
> Which are the advantages to use Maildir instead of Mailbox?
[http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html]
> What about mail clients mail readers (mutt, elm pine, etc)
> using Maildir?
mutt ==
Make sure you check in /var/qmail/users/assign and make sure that is
pointing to the correct place for your virtual domains and check that the
uid/gid is correct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
In a message dated 6/7/01 12:55:37 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> From this information, and the information you've provided below, it
> looks to me that you probably did something like this:
>
> echo "example.com:example.com" > /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
>
In a message dated 6/7/01 1:30:31 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Make sure you check in /var/qmail/users/assign and make sure that is
> pointing to the correct place for your virtual domains and check that the
> uid/gid is correct.
This is in /var/qmail/users/assign (an
George:
"/var/qmail/control" directory contains control files. That is the best
explanation. They control the operation and behavior of qmail.
"defaultdomain" control file is used to argument any email address in the
message that are not recognized as being proper [EMAIL PROTECTED] format.
"def
what about three accounts, with a three way forward?
seems easier to do, or?
tom
- Original Message -
From: "marco1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:48 PM
Subject: ACL
I'm using Qmail + Vpomail + Courier-Imap and would like to enable Acl on
ma
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:36:53PM +0200, Jörgen Persson allegedly wrote:
> Sorry, but I'm not all comfortable with this...
>
> There's been 4 similar reports of qmail-remote not behaving properly to
> this list during the last month.
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/200
> What about mail clients mail readers (mutt, elm pine, etc)
> using Maildir?
>
> --yapedu/xgnu
Mutt plays well with Maildirs.
Good mutt.
--joshua.
In a message dated 6/7/01 3:27:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thought so -- you overwrote virtualdomains, and chismtrail.com was in
> there. ;) Got a copy of the original (backups, etc.)?
That was it! Thank you so much. I don't have a copy, but think I can
rebuild
> What are the probabilities of the Sendmail server being the one causing
> the problems? What if the mail admin of mg.hk5.outblaze.com has used
> some sort of patch that is causing qmail-remote's to hang? Has anyone
> communicated with outblaze.com's postmaster?
There is nothing a remote system
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:36:53PM +0200, Jörgen Persson wrote:
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg00558.html
rethat 6.2, outblaze.com
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg01332.html
rethat 6.2, outblaze.com
> http://www.ornl.gov/it
And now, just to add fat to the fire, my boss cannot access his email. I'll
deal with that tomorrow. -- Scarlett O'Hara
Brian Moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We do know that all the emails are getting sent. We count how many mails we
> should be sending and the numbers match up with the logs. Does qmail-inject
> retry qmail-queue if it fails?
I don't think so; I'd have to check the source to be sure. I can't
None of my alias addresses work. I guess I need to put all the domains back
in virtual. I know I can do it through the 'echo
"eachdomain.com:domain.com" >> \ /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains' route.
Would it be equally effective just to go into virtualdomains and edit the
file?
> > >
> > > D
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:40:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/7/01 12:55:37 PM Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> > From this information, and the information you've provided below, it
> > looks to me that you probably did something like thi
How do I know/find out if my system has the qmailqueue patch that is
required to enable qmail to call a different qmail-queue program than the
one compiled in by default? Where would I find this information?
Joy Hundley
Internet Services
Service Transport
800-528-1616 ext. 240
Visit us on the
Should I chown the top four to alias? Three of them have worked in the past,
but garnette has not worked at all. And, should I do anything about the
-rw-r--r--?
-rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 11 Apr 20 14:01 .qmail-evergreenequikits-info
-rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 19 May 22 13:49 .qmail-fiskr
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:28:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/7/01 3:18:07 PM Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> > Doesn't chismtrail.com need to go back in virtualdomains?
> >
> > echo "chismtrail.com:chismtrail.com" >> \
> > /var/qmail
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:41:11PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/7/01 1:30:31 PM Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Make sure you check in /var/qmail/users/assign and make sure that is
> > pointing to the correct place for your virtual domains and
Hey all--
I have ezmlm installed, and really like it's bounce detection, but for
certain reasons I must use a different mailing list manager. I'd like to
take advantage of it's bounce handling though. Is there a way to have qmail
watch for a certain header, and then implement bounce tracking on
We do know that all the emails are getting sent. We count how many mails we
should be sending and the numbers match up with the logs. Does qmail-inject
retry qmail-queue if it fails?
As for Reiser, we know we are a bit behind on it. We are still on 2.2.16
kernel and running the last reiser we
In a message dated 6/7/01 3:18:07 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Doesn't chismtrail.com need to go back in virtualdomains?
>
> echo "chismtrail.com:chismtrail.com" >> \
> /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
I'll try that. I guess I need to restart qmail after the
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:52:41PM -0400, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:40:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In a message dated 6/7/01 12:55:37 PM Central Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > >
> > > From this information, and the information you've p
J=F6rgen Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There's been 4 similar reports of qmail-remote not behaving properly t=
o
>this list during the last month.=20
>
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg00558.=
html
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:36:53PM +0200, Jörgen Persson wrote:
> Sorry, but I'm not all comfortable with this...
>
> There's been 4 similar reports of qmail-remote not behaving properly to
> this list during the last month.
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg00
Jörgen Persson wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I'm not all comfortable with this...
>
> There's been 4 similar reports of qmail-remote not behaving properly to
> this list during the last month.
> We still haven't been able to help any of them...
>
> This doesn't look like a coincidence to me since two
Mark et. al. -
It *is* possible, though, for qmail-remote to move slowly enough that it
appears to hang (yes, even for hours or days). timeoutremote applies to
every read() and write() - in the very worst case, each of these system
calls might move only a single byte.
Consider a 5000 byte messa
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:39:25PM -0700, David Lowe allegedly wrote:
> Mark et. al. -
>
> It *is* possible, though, for qmail-remote to move slowly enough that it
> appears to hang (yes, even for hours or days). timeoutremote applies to
> every read() and write() - in the very worst case, each
Hi All:
I have been on this list for the last couple of months but have not seen a
message like such. Is it possible to send a message to all people who has an
email address. If YES then what to enter in the "to" filed of the email
message. I will be happy to read, if there is a document which ex
Hi,
I am sorry, can you tell me how to unsuscribe this
mailing list. I have tried to find instruction but I have not found
a way to do it.
Thanks a lot,
Hoang
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 05:02:46PM -0700, Harry wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive and send emails through SQWEB
>mail, but i am not able to get my emails through outlook express. I get error " there
>was problem logging onto your mail server. Your passowrd
A little more information would be helpful... here's a few areas to look. In
responding back to the list, please include any error messages where
appropriate.
What POP daemon/inetd process are you running on the mail server?
Does it show up in the process list if its a daemon?
>From the local mac
Joy Hundley writes:
> How do I know/find out if my system has the qmailqueue patch that is
> required to enable qmail to call a different qmail-queue program than the
> one compiled in by default? Where would I find this information?
strings /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd | grep QMAILQUEUE
Or lo
> From: "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 09:38:56 -0500
>
> I've got a slightly old set of qmail-ldap patches. I guess I'd better upgrade!
For those who made an attempt to help me out, I'd like to report that it was
all due to my own stupidity. my smtp.cdb file
hi all,
I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive
and send emails through SQWEB mail, but i am not able to get my emails through
outlook express. I get error " there was problem logging onto your mail server.
Your passowrd was rejected. Protocol:POP3, Server Response:-ERR Bad logi
Hi there,
I'm using POP-before-SMTP function in vpopmail.
Everything was working fine if to relay successfully authenticated users
since I started trying to set the environment variable DATABYTES on my
tcp.smtp.cdb file, but POP-before-SMTP don't set it on the new
roaming user.
Like:
original t
96 matches
Mail list logo
