Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting - What is possible in Qmail-Toaster?

2009-08-11 Thread Eric Shubert
-Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: Wednesday, 12 August 2009 10:46 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting - What is possible in Qmail-Toaster? Mike Canty wrote: Can anyone please let me know

RE: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting - What is possible in Qmail-Toaster?

2009-08-11 Thread Mike Canty
: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting - What is possible in Qmail-Toaster? Mike Canty wrote: > Can anyone please let me know what is available for "Greylisting" with > Qmail-Toaster > > Cheers > > Mike Canty > > Mike Canty

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting - What is possible in Qmail-Toaster?

2009-08-11 Thread Eric Shubert
Mike Canty wrote: Can anyone please let me know what is available for "Greylisting" with Qmail-Toaster Cheers Mike Canty Mike Canty IT Operations Manager qtp-install-spamdyke is in qmailtoaster-plus package. See the QTP site and the wiki for more, and you might need to reference the docum

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting - What is possible in Qmail-Toaster?

2009-08-11 Thread Eric Shubert
Mike Canty wrote: Can anyone please let me know what is available for "Greylisting" with Qmail-Toaster Cheers Mike Canty Mike Canty IT Operations Manager One word: spamdyke. Does greylisting and a whole lot more. -- -Eric 'shubes'

[qmailtoaster] Greylisting - What is possible in Qmail-Toaster?

2009-08-11 Thread Mike Canty
Can anyone please let me know what is available for "Greylisting" with Qmail-Toaster Cheers Mike Canty Mike Canty IT Operations Manager - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsu

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2008-04-04 Thread Phil Leinhauser
hmmm... I'll have to look into it now. Thanks -Original message- From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:14:19 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting > No Spamassassin and Spam

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2008-04-04 Thread Andrew Niemantsverdriet
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting > > > My (Alan) Nguyen wrote: > > > I'm setting up greylisting on my server right now and while reading over > > > the instructions it appears to be easy to set up, but there

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2008-04-04 Thread Phil Leinhauser
: [qmailtoaster] greylisting > My (Alan) Nguyen wrote: > > I’m setting up greylisting on my server right now and while reading over > > the instructions it appears to be easy to set up, but there doesn’t > > appear to be any details as to how to fine tune greylisting. If say you

RE: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2008-04-04 Thread My (Alan) Nguyen
day, April 04, 2008 11:59 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting My (Alan) Nguyen wrote: > I'm setting up greylisting on my server right now and while reading over > the instructions it appears to be easy to set up, but there doesn't

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2008-04-04 Thread Eric Shubert
My (Alan) Nguyen wrote: > I’m setting up greylisting on my server right now and while reading over > the instructions it appears to be easy to set up, but there doesn’t > appear to be any details as to how to fine tune greylisting. If say your > qmail server is blocking a specific site or domain a

[qmailtoaster] greylisting

2008-04-04 Thread My (Alan) Nguyen
I'm setting up greylisting on my server right now and while reading over the instructions it appears to be easy to set up, but there doesn't appear to be any details as to how to fine tune greylisting. If say your qmail server is blocking a specific site or domain and you want to allow it because

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Do you have a PTR (reverse) DNS record set up? Sure do. I have other email servers on my net and they all work fine. It's the QMT that's having these problems only. > To get mails to Yahoo you'll have to fill out their form. If your server > has been around a long time, you'll be in their list

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread Jake Vickers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, since it's not actually bouncing and just being deferred, that's not too bad at least. It does seem to fail often enough however and I've been ripping my hair out trying to figure out why. I do have MX, SPF and RDNS records for everything. Yet, I keep getting

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> if you are using QMT-ISO you need to change several qmail's control file > other than localhost Yup, have done this also. What ever is going on, it's either something simple, or not obvious to me or who knows what :). I do appreciate your help on this! Mike -

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread PakOgah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: once I was using apache/php application on intranet machine (on local network) sending email using smtp of new QMT-ISO box (on public net) and I get this error ... while talking to mails.myholding.com.: MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1313 <<< 511 sor

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>once I was using apache/php application on intranet machine (on local >network) sending email using smtp of new QMT-ISO box (on public net) >and I get this error >... while talking to mails.myholding.com.: > >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1313 ><<< 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for send

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread PakOgah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, apache/php applications that use this new server to send sign up emails out definitely mostly have these issues. On the other hand, users who have email accounts on that same server can send out to those domains without deferrals. once I was using ap

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread PakOgah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PS: These are examples of messages I am receiving; To Yahoo, delivery 239: deferral: Connected_to_209.191.118.103_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_ 421_Message_from_(x.x.x.250)_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._ Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/d

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: These are examples of messages I am receiving; To Yahoo, delivery 239: deferral: Connected_to_209.191.118.103_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_ 421_Message_from_(x.x.x.250)_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._ Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer-06.html/ To Hotm

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I am a little confused about your email? is it email from your server being >graylisted when you sent to Yahoo / Hotmail ? Yes, I thought I did say it was coming from the new server I built. Outgoing to yahoo for example immediately is deferred from this server but not another one on my network.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-18 Thread PakOgah
d some light on this? I've also found this but prefer asking the list for input before I go changing too much. http://www.kabewm.com/2007/01/16/basic-qmailtoaster-greylisting/ Mike I am a little confused about your email? is it email from your server being graylisted when you sent

[qmailtoaster] Greylisting problem

2007-10-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7;ve also found this but prefer asking the list for input before I go changing too much. http://www.kabewm.com/2007/01/16/basic-qmailtoaster-greylisting/ Mike - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hoste

RE: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting

2007-05-17 Thread PakOgah
> > Dear, > > I'm new to qmailtoaster, I'm now in the process of setting up a new > server > and have to implement qmailtoaster. Can anyone inform me about > synchronizing > address book? As my client will use outlook express 2003 for they MUA. > Please help.. > > Regards, > Lauqin hmm... have yo

RE: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting

2007-05-14 Thread Nuryono
Dear, I'm new to qmailtoaster, I'm now in the process of setting up a new server and have to implement qmailtoaster. Can anyone inform me about synchronizing address book? As my client will use outlook express 2003 for they MUA. Please help.. Regards, Lauqin --

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting implementation

2007-05-09 Thread davide bozzelli
Ron Dyck writes: I'm new to qmailtoaster, though I have been using qmail for a number of years. I'm now in the process of setting up a new server and have implemented qmailtoaster. I'm considering greylisting to cut down on spam and have breifly looked at a few implementations. Does anyone have

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting implementation

2007-05-09 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
http://www.kabewm.com/?p=19 Also, greylisting can cause issues with spam appliances. Many of these spam appliances do not have a large cache and will just take the temporary rejection as a permanent rejection. Thanks, Erik On 5/9/07, Ron Dyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm new to qmailtoaster,

[qmailtoaster] greylisting implementation

2007-05-09 Thread Ron Dyck
I'm new to qmailtoaster, though I have been using qmail for a number of years. I'm now in the process of setting up a new server and have implemented qmailtoaster. I'm considering greylisting to cut down on spam and have breifly looked at a few implementations. Does anyone have suggestions as to

[qmailtoaster] Greylisting

2007-05-09 Thread Ron Dyck
I'm new to qmailtoaster, though I have been using qmail for a number of years. I'm now in the process of setting up a new server and have implemented qmailtoaster. I'm considering greylisting to cut down on spam and have breifly looked at a few implementations. Does anyone have suggestions as to

Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING

2007-02-09 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
24x7server wrote: > hi > > nowadays once every week or so we get an enormous number of spam hits which > increases the number of concurrent incoming connections to around 250, > causing too much load on server. reducing this figure means our clients > suffer. > > normally concurrency incoming

Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Espinoza
It's up. Erik On 2/9/07, Jean-Paul van de Plasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Btw, would be nice if this rpm can go to the devel site.. JP - Original Message - From: "Philip Nix Guru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:13 PM

Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Espinoza
07 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING > Hello > http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/TCP_Server_limits_configuration > You ll find the ucspi with the limit_patch link > and the infos on how to setup the variables in your cdb file > > Cheers > -Philip > > > Eri

Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING

2007-02-09 Thread Jean-Paul van de Plasse
Btw, would be nice if this rpm can go to the devel site.. JP - Original Message - From: "Philip Nix Guru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING Hello http://wiki.qmailtoast

Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING

2007-02-09 Thread Philip Nix Guru
Hello http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/TCP_Server_limits_configuration You ll find the ucspi with the limit_patch link and the infos on how to setup the variables in your cdb file Cheers -Philip Erik Espinoza wrote: Hello Rajesh, Greylisting has many issues with newer smtp firewalls and

Re: [qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Espinoza
Hello Rajesh, Greylisting has many issues with newer smtp firewalls and spam appliances. As they do not have much space, they usually do not retry after receiving an error 4xx. As such we are not going to be including greylisting in the QmailToaster. That said, there is info on simple greylistin

[qmailtoaster] GREYLISTING

2007-02-09 Thread 24x7server
hi nowadays once every week or so we get an enormous number of spam hits which increases the number of concurrent incoming connections to around 250, causing too much load on server. reducing this figure means our clients suffer. normally concurrency incoming it is just 25 - 40 range. we are p

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting warning

2007-01-23 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Erik Espinoza wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I ran into a problem while testing a greylisting patch from Bill > Shupp's site. Many of the new antispam appliances and certain > firewalals are used as a smart host, so it looks as follows: > > Exchange -> antispam appliance -> QmailToaster > > Many of the

[qmailtoaster] greylisting warning

2007-01-23 Thread Erik Espinoza
Hey Guys, I ran into a problem while testing a greylisting patch from Bill Shupp's site. Many of the new antispam appliances and certain firewalals are used as a smart host, so it looks as follows: Exchange -> antispam appliance -> QmailToaster Many of the antispam appliances are having issues

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting

2007-01-17 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Wojciech Gabor wrote: > Dnia wtorek, 16 stycznia 2007 09:43, Erik Espinoza napisał: >> You may want to check this out: >> >> http://thomas.mangin.me.uk/software/qmail-greylist.html > > Simple and effective. > THX Erik. > WG, I take it you've had success with this? Would you care to elaborate some

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting

2007-01-17 Thread Wojciech Gabor
Dnia wtorek, 16 stycznia 2007 09:43, Erik Espinoza napisał: > You may want to check this out: > > http://thomas.mangin.me.uk/software/qmail-greylist.html Simple and effective. THX Erik. -- System uptime: 41 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 days 9 hours 45 minuts

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting

2007-01-16 Thread Erik Espinoza
You may want to check this out: http://thomas.mangin.me.uk/software/qmail-greylist.html Install instructions are simple: cd /var/qmail/bin ; wget http://thomas.mangin.me.uk/data/source/greyd ; chmod +x greyd mkdir /var/qmail/grey ; chown vpopmail.vchkpw /var/qmail/grey Add ',GREY=""' to the :al

[qmailtoaster] Greylisting

2007-01-16 Thread Wojciech Gabor
I plan start any greylisting with QT. What package is recommended for QT? Any HOWTO? -- Tuptus System uptime: 41 years 8 months 3 weeks 0 days 3 hours 45 minuts Why use windows since there is a door? - QmailToaster hosted

[qmailtoaster] Greylisting in Qtoaster

2006-08-29 Thread ldap
I was wondering if there is one who has implemented greylisting as a means of fighting spams. Is it effective? Any information that will help implement it is greatly appreciated. Crispin. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hos

[qmailtoaster] Greylisting for qmail-toaste-1.03-1.3.5

2006-07-31 Thread Yeak Nai Siew
Hi Erik, I have patched the current qmail-toaster 1.03-1.3.5 with greylisting. I am now temporary deploying it. Explanation below. All files are in https://marvin.md.com.my/~yeak/greylisting/ Few notes: 1. I only used Bill Shubb patch 20060717. 2. The patch did not work straight away. So I go th

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-17 Thread Yeak Nai Siew
Yes, it work with SMTP AUTH. The patch was not applied directly. I have to modify the patch manually based on the given patch and create a new patch. I try to find that out and email you to have a look. Erik Espinoza wrote: > Hello Yeak, > > Thanks for the feedback. One quick question, did th

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Anatoly A. Pedemonte Ku
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all Interesting the investigation of Dewmill.com. It is an interesting functionality if it were gotten up in QT Best regards... - -- Anatoly Alexei Pedemonte Ku RAGE SYSTEMS S.A.C. h

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Erik Espinoza
Hello Yeak, Thanks for the feedback. One quick question, did the Shupp patch work with SMTP-AUTH? Thanks, Erik On 7/16/06, Yeak Nai Siew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Eric and also Erik. :-) I would like to share my experience of using greylitsing. > > I proceeded to search for existing greyl

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Yeak Nai Siew
Hi Eric and also Erik. :-) I would like to share my experience of using greylitsing. > > I proceeded to search for existing greylist software that would fit well > in the Toaster. There are a lot of solutions available (I won't go into > details here), but only one that I thing might fit well wit

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Erik Espinoza wrote: You are correct that the recommended waiting period is 1 hour, the 4 hour is after the second rejection. The default for sendmail (IE 75% of mail servers) will wait 1 hour. First time mail coming in will be delayed up to an hour, once the triplet is in the db, it will go bac

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Erik Espinoza
> - Typical retry after soft rejection for most smtp servers is 4 hrs, > so one will wait 4 hrs for every e-mail to be delivered. Not according what I've read. If the parameter for waiting (recommended 1 hour) is reduced to as little as 10 seconds (I think I'd try 30-60 seconds), then the wait is

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Erik Espinoza wrote: Hey Eric, The drawbacks are not correct, here are more to go with what you have. I believe the drawbacks I listed are correct. Which one is not? I didn't intend my list to be exhaustive, however I did unintentionally omit the one about server farms. - Typical retry aft

Re: [qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Erik Espinoza
Hey Eric, The drawbacks are not correct, here are more to go with what you have. - Typical retry after soft rejection for most smtp servers is 4 hrs, so one will wait 4 hrs for every e-mail to be delivered. - False positives generated by: Novell Groupwise 6.0, ISMail 1.7.1 and prior, InterMail 4

[qmailtoaster] Greylisting evaluation for QMT

2006-07-16 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Thanks to Erik for pointing me in the right direction and getting me started on this. I don't know if this will materialize or not, but here's what I've found to this point. Greylisting has reportedly had much success in the spam war. There are benefits, but there are also drawbacks. There are

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2006-07-14 Thread Erik Espinoza
I hear good things about greylisting, and I think it would be a nice addition to the toaster's many nice features. Is there any reason why adding that capability isn't a good idea? There are a lot of issues with greylisting in general, many of them explained here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2006-07-14 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Erik Espinoza wrote: Does the toaster have greylisting capability? No If not, is someone working on it? No I hear good things about greylisting, and I think it would be a nice addition to the toaster's many nice features. Is there any reason why adding that capability isn't a good idea

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2006-07-14 Thread Erik Espinoza
Does the toaster have greylisting capability? No If not, is someone working on it? No - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted - To unsu

[qmailtoaster] greylisting

2006-07-14 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Does the toaster have greylisting capability? If not, is someone working on it? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted - T

[qmailtoaster] GreyListing on QmailToaster

2006-03-30 Thread Anatoly Alexei Pedemonte Ku
Can implement GreyListing on QmailToaster? Its possible. What I must have to do it? --- Anatoly Alexei Pedemonte Ku RAGE SYSTEMS S.A.C. http://www.ragesys.net Av. Juan Pascal Pringles 1225 (ex- La Fontana) Teléfono: 511.7962262 Móv

Re: [qmailtoaster] greylisting

2005-12-14 Thread George
t a fan George - Original Message - From: "Marius Karthaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 4:28 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] greylisting Hi, I was wondering if there were any plans to support greylisting. Greylisting is a wonderfull way of stoppi

[qmailtoaster] greylisting

2005-12-14 Thread Marius Karthaus
Hi, I was wondering if there were any plans to support greylisting. Greylisting is a wonderfull way of stopping spam and viri. In a nutshell greylisting gives an error to the sender of an email the first time the combination "from, to, IP" is encountered. A normal mailserver will retry a few minu