-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>[root@ripley samba]# smbclient -L localhost
>added interface ip=192.168.230.201 bcast=192.168.230.255
>nmask=255.255.255.0
>added interface ip=172.16.166.1 bcast=172.16.166.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
>added interface ip=172.16.177.1 bcast=172.16.177.25
Title: RE: slashdotted?
I think I am one of the few comp geeks that doesn't
read slashdot on a regular basis. I actually prefer other outlets such as
tomshardware and theregister to slashdot. Maybe it is because I use linux
for servers only and not a desktop... Maybe its because I have bec
Hi,
I still can't start Samba. I just compiled Samba 2.2.2 to upgrade from
2.2.1a. I'm going through the DIAGNOSIS.txt file. So far, I can run
testparm without errors, ping the Linux Samba server from Windows
machines and vice versa. But then I'm stuck at smbclient. 'smbclient
-L localhost'
Well, if they are not running away, AOL would benefit from the 600
employees (minus Alan Cox) who are most experienced with RH.
At 02:20 PM 1/21/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> this may be a naive question but, what exactly would AOL
>get from *buying* red hat, as opposed to simply *using* red hat.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Truelsen wrote:
>I just inherited a Compaq 1267 laptop that has these little keys on it for
>bringing up a browser, mail program and the like. I would like to set them
>up for use in linux, to bring up a terminal, galeon, that sort of thing. Ho
Simple. If they wanted to use Linux as the base for something in the
future, they would want to make sure that the developers were stable
financially. RedHat is profitable, but barely so. If there were some
major issue the financial health of RH would be at risk, and so would
whatever AOL migh
* On 21-01-02 at 20:22
* Trond Eivind Glomsrød said
> > I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
> > careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
> > want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
> > topic of "Redhat censors their mailing lists"
>
> We don't. But switc
> -Original Message-
> From: rpjday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AOL in Negotiations to Buy Red Hat
>
> this may be a naive question but, what exactly would AOL
> get from *buying* red hat, as opposed to simp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 20:15
* Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) said
> That shouldn't be an issue if Red Hat is kept as a subsidiary of AOL or at
> least as a semi-autonomous company like Netscape. In any case, I'm not saying
> I'm really excited by
this may be a naive question but, what exactly would AOL
get from *buying* red hat, as opposed to simply *using* red hat.
after all, given the GPL nature of red hat, certainly they have
the right to build any technology around red hat that they want,
provided that they don't violate the terms o
Just in keeping with, BBSpot already has a satirical article on this:
http://www.bbspot.com/News/2002/01/Top_11_redhat.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 02:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
nit etc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another
> > distro, what would be
> > > the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
> >
> > That's a very
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>
> > Third, Red Hat still has excellent developers and employees who have been
> > working their asses off for several years to turn out great products, great
> > service and great support.
>
> And the developers and employees must do what they're told wh
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Janyne Kizer wrote:
>
> This is the problem. Red Hat is committed to open source. AOL-Time
> Warner is committed to proprietary development. Think AIM and AOL
> Keyword and all of the problems that occur on mailing lists (listserv
> and majordomo both) every time a new ver
JW writes:
> Hope that makes sense :-)
>
Sure does. Thanks.
Ian.
Ian Truelsen
Masters program in Philosophy
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
BA (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current favourite quote:
"No great civilisation likes forests."
K.F. O'Connor
Lin
Ian,
On Monday 21 January 2002 01:40, you said something about:
> I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here
> and in other lists. I am not sure if I am just dense, or if I am too new to
> this to know the lore, but what does the term refer to?
>
> Thanks for filling
At 06:40 PM 1/21/2002 +, you wrote:
>I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here and in other
>lists. I am not sure if I am just dense, or if I am too new to this to know the lore,
>but what does the term refer to?
Presumably you know about the geek-news site
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 19:56
* Brad Bonkoski said
> www.slashdot.org
> (linux friendly/geek news board)
...and presumably the term 'slashdotted' refers to being reported/talked
about on www.slashdot.org.
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax
This link gives a pretty good explanation:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/slashdot-effect.html
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:40:23PM +, Ian Truelsen wrote:
> I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here and
> in other lists. I am not sure if I am just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 19:50
* Adam Goucher said
>
> Does it happen when pine is open? Pine will bleep everytime a new message
> arrives in the currently opened mailbox.
No, good point though, I usually have Mutt runing on one console but I
don't
Title: RE: slashdotted?
www.slashdot.org
(linux friendly/geek news board)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Truelsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:40 AM
> To: RedHat List
> Subject: slashdotted?
>
>
> I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up
I have been seeing the term 'slashdotted' come up a few times, both here and
in other lists. I am not sure if I am just dense, or if I am too new to this
to know the lore, but what does the term refer to?
Thanks for filling the knowledge gap.
Ian.
Ian Truelsen
Masters program in Philosophy
Does it happen when pine is open? Pine will bleep everytime a new message
arrives in the currently opened mailbox.
-adam
> Hi all
> Is there a way I can find out what the system bell just bleeped for?
> Now and again I here it go and just can't fathom out why.
>
> Thanks
> - --
>
> Nick Wil
- Original Message -
From: Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: [OT] speech issues on this list
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >> I see that yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 19:15
* Anthony E. Greene said
> >> I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
> >> careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
> >> want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
> >> topic of "Redhat censors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
>>
>> I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
>> careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
>> want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
>> topic of "Redhat censors their mailing lists
Try "rpm --rebuilddb"
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Lewi wrote:
> i recently receive this error while install from rpm
> error: db3 error(-30998) from db->close: DB_INCOMPLETE: Cache flush was unable to
>complete
>
> rpmdb: Unreferenced page 5783
> error: db3 error(-30985) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 19-01-02 at 17:51
* Ben Logan said
> This isn't a list, but I think it's a pretty good resource. I didn't
> know about it until recently:
>
> The Unix Guru Universe
> http://www.ugu.com
Yes, that does look worthwhile.
Still looking for
Hi Ben
Do you have the routing table for 192.168.1.41? The second thing both
mach1 and mach2 have the same ip address 192.168.1.40. My guess is mach2
is supposed to have 192.168.1.41.
You will need IP forwarding on all the boxes except mach4 as well.
david
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Ben Logan wrote
Hi all,
My first time on the list. I have been looking at the archives but am not
able to find anything on this.
I have 3 web servers, 1 development/nfs server and 2 database mysql servers
in a cluster server farm. All sites are owned by our company so nobody will
be on the system except for m
i recently receive this error while install from rpm
error: db3 error(-30998) from db->close: DB_INCOMPLETE: Cache flush was unable to
complete
rpmdb: Unreferenced page 5783
error: db3 error(-30985) from db->verify: DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database verification failed
this problem occured when i press C
First, try kep in a non volatile file all data about it
Try to see all files relatives to log any action done by the kernel. This is
in /etc/syslog.conf, at his point, you must find out any entry like :
kern.* /dev/console
and insert down a line as :
kern.*/my_log_file
that
Frank Carreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> To redhat: I was unaware this list has a terms of usage policy
> disallowing such discussion. This comment doesn't serve a purpose.
> To John Verel: I recommend either Mandrake or SUSE. Both have been
> VERY good distro's in the past and have b
>> > If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another
>> distro, what would be
>> > the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
Bandwidth spartanly:
Be a Man! (Or *really* butch...)
GET SLACK!!!
HTTP://WWW.SlackWare.Com
HTTP://WWW.SubGenius.Com
Woop. ;))
All the best,
[EMAIL
Hello again:
> Hello:
>
> As I only know enough to be dangerous, I hope that someone can help. I am
> trying to get Outlook 2000 configured as an IMAP client and Red Hat Linux
> 7.2 configured as a IMAP server.
>
> I installed the imap-2000c-15.i386.rpm package and have created an IMAP
> "account
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Chris Montgomery posted the following:
CM>There's a link to the story on the Reuters home page, under Technology, so
CM>I would say it's legit. http://www.reuters.com
it's also found its way on to cnn.com!
http://www.cnn.com/20
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:51:17AM -0500, Janyne Kizer wrote:
>
> This is the problem. Red Hat is committed to open source. AOL-Time
> Warner is committed to proprietary development. Think AIM and AOL
> Keyword and all of the problems that occur on mailing lists (listserv
> and majordomo both)
To redhat: I was unaware this list has a terms of usage policy disallowing such
discussion. This comment doesn't serve a purpose.
To John Verel: I recommend either Mandrake or SUSE. Both have been VERY good
distro's in the past and have been happy with them. I've pretty much standardized o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:39
* nit etc said
>
> I see that you are an employee of Redhat. I'd be
> careful of such comments if I were you; you wouldn't
> want something on Slashdot or Linuxtoday with the
> topic of "Redhat censors their mailing list
Title: RE: Changing from Red Hat to another distro: recommendations?
Gosh I think idle threats like this are inappropriate as they waste value bandwidth.
(and I am *NOT* a redhat employee)
As for the original question, Mandrake was spun off of Redhat and is thus very similar.
There are m
There's a link to the story on the Reuters home page, under Technology, so
I would say it's legit. http://www.reuters.com
Chris
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:04:41 -0500
Janyne Kizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that if the article was entirely off base, RH would have
> denied it rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:34
* rpjday said
> "An even greater challenge to Microsoft would be for AOL Time Warner
> to develop a rival operating system that works exclusively with the
> media giant's own Internet service provider, its Web browser o
--- Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another
> distro, what would be
> > the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
>
> That's a very inapproriate question on this list.
>
> --
> Tron
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Janyne Kizer wrote:
> This is the problem. Red Hat is committed to open source. AOL-Time
> Warner is committed to proprietary development. Think AIM and AOL
> Keyword and all of the problems that occur on mailing lists (listserv
> and majordomo both) every time a new versio
* On 21-01-02 at 17:29
* Trond Eivind Glomsrød said
> > If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would be
> > the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
>
> That's a very inapproriate question on this list.
Why?
In light of other threads expressing the fears of ma
John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would be
> the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
That's a very inapproriate question on this list.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
I just inherited a Compaq 1267 laptop that has these little keys on it for
bringing up a browser, mail program and the like. I would like to set them
up for use in linux, to bring up a terminal, galeon, that sort of thing. How
would I go about doing something like that? Are there tools that can
I would think that if the article was entirely off base, RH would have
denied it rather than saying "we don't comment on rumors."
JW wrote:
>
> Say... has anyone from _redhat_ said anything about this? Or is this just a big
>rumor that W-post is putting out for the humor of it?
>
> For that ma
I was aware that entire packages of theirs (like OpenSSH) were widely used
in other systems, but I hadn't realized that patches of theirs to things
like telnet and sudo made it into Linux distributions. I am thankful
though that their security auditing efforts and solid code are benefitting
Linux
"Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz)" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > I think I'll be following you,
> > I can hear Debian calling my name.
> >
> > - --
> >
> > Nick Wilson
> >
>
> Come on! Shouldn't we give them the benefit of the doubt? If a merger or
> buyout doe
On Friday 18 January 2002 19:12, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oeystein Olsen wrote:
> >I'm running RH7.2 on my laptop from Dell, and I've installed a suspend to
> >disk partition. I'm having some problems configuring grub to boot from
> > that parti
Matthew,
On Monday 21 January 2002 09:49, you said something about:
> I came across this recently on my Redhat 7.1 box:
>
> [root@bindlestiff mboedick]# rpm -q sudo
> sudo-1.6.4-0.7x.2
> [root@bindlestiff mboedick]# strings /usr/bin/sudo | tail -1
> $OpenBSD: skeleton.c,v 1.18 2001/11/19 19:02:18
I'm still struggling with this. I used the same ntp.conf as my time server,
which successfully has its time synchronized on the net. All I did was
change the ntp.conf to have the client look locally for the time. The
ntp.conf is at the bottom. I'm looking at the docs, but so far I'm not
seeing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
Is there a way I can find out what the system bell just bleeped for?
Now and again I here it go and just can't fathom out why.
Thanks
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
-BEGIN PG
I came across this recently on my Redhat 7.1 box:
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]# rpm -q sudo
sudo-1.6.4-0.7x.2
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]# strings /usr/bin/sudo | tail -1
$OpenBSD: skeleton.c,v 1.18 2001/11/19 19:02:18 mpech Exp $
[root@bindlestiff mboedick]#
I'm kind of curious about it. Anyon
Yes-- cleared up overnight, after I spent all of Thursday trying to figure
out what was wrong.
Several others on this list had the same symptoms, which also cleared up
overnight. I'm convinced it was due to slow response from DNS servers, when
sendmail was doing a reverse dns lookup.
Whenever m
OpenNMS appears to have some significant shortcomings for what I need it to
do. That's not to say it isn't good competition for Openview. I need to be
able to import, or install, MIB information to be used when traps are
collected. With OpenNMS you have to manually create an XML doc with all of
linuxconf has a sendmail module;
if you don't have linuxconf installed, get out your RH cd#2,
mount /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
cd /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS
ls -l linux*
and when you see it listed
rpm -ivh linuxconf*
Then add the sendmail module to linuxconf -- run linuxconf, got to
"linuxconf configurati
Yes, but I have forced it into ssh2 only mode, to avoid the ssh1 bug. It
seems that scp2 is needed to do the transfers over ssh2, or something like
that. As soon as I made that change, everythin died.
-Original Message-
From: Gregg Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, Janua
This expains Sunday's User Friendly comic strip... I thought it was funny,
but I thought it seemed out of left field...
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20020120
-Original Message-
From: Bob Staaf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PRO
Happens when the clock is slow, too.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Statux wrote:
> Remember that you can't log off before you log on. Syncronizing the clock
> can cause a fast clock to be set back.. effectively messing things up. Try
> things like 'lastlog' and 'ac' and see if either of them yell at yo
Sometimes a few seconds (usually)...although when I did it a few minutes
after discovering the cause, there should have been no difference to
adjust.
I'll have to try ntpdate, I guess.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Devon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 20 Januar
http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/weblog/view/wlg/1074
--
Microsoft Windows: Proof that P.T. Barnum was correct.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> Interesting to note that several contributors to this thread were using
> Outlook Express?
I'm one of them. What's your point? I"ve got 2 systems sitting in front of
me - one's running Red Hat Linux 7.1 and is my web/DNS/e-mail server, and
one's running Win2K. My primary desktop at home used
Nick Wilson wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>* On 21-01-02 at 09:03
>* ABrady said
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:53:30 -0500
>>John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
>>
>>>If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would
>>>be the most similar,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 12:18
* ABrady said
>
> I can't recommend Debian simply because I've tried installing it 10-15
> times on 3 different machines with 2 different releases. It failed every
> time on a hardware issue. Not something weird, but rela
On 04:56 21 Jan 2002, ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:05:14 -0600
| Chad and Doria Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
| > > Use rxvt instead with the -C option. Or xterm with -C (if it does
| > > transparency, which I think it does not). Eterm might have this
| > > opt
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:15:23 +0100
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> * On 21-01-02 at 09:03
> * ABrady said
>
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:53:30 -0500
> > John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> >
> > > If one were to move
Yes. I didn't to begin with, but then turned it on. Still have the
same problem though.
Ben
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:11:21PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you have IP fowarding turn on? if not turn it on. I have a DSL connection
> using ppp0 and the rest of my network is a 198.X.X.X.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:05:14 -0600
Chad and Doria Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
>
> > Use rxvt instead with the -C option. Or xterm with -C (if it does
> > transparency, which I think it does not). Eterm might have this
> > option too, maybe.
>
> I downloaded this and it works fine, but
Hey guys,
Anyone had any luck with say, the Linux version of audiogalaxy's
satellite program? If so what did you do to get it to recognize you
were runnning it? Thanks.
-Brandon
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at htt
Thanks!
I got 2.2.2 compiled and installed. I'm going to try the configuration
after some sleep.
David Talkington wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hidong Kim wrote:
>
> >struct statfs {
> >long f_type;
> >long f_bsize;
> >long f_bl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hidong Kim wrote:
>struct statfs {
>long f_type;
>long f_bsize;
>long f_blocks;
>long f_bfree;
>long f_bavail;
>long f_files;
>long f_ffree;
>__kernel_fsid_t f_fsid;
>long f_name
No, but its not that dificult to upgrade by the source code, once you do it that
way you will always do it that way, a quick and dirty would be
rpm -i kernel-source then copy the config you want from /usr/src/linux-
2.4/configs /usr/src/.config
then rpm -e kernel-source
then download a new s
Hi,
I tried to install the source RPM, but it crashed with this error:
checking configure summary
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21099 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21099 (%build)
I'd lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hidong Kim wrote:
>[root@ripley bin]# ./testparm
>Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
>Processing section "[public]"
>Processing section "[public]"
>Processing section "[printers]"
>Loaded services file OK.
>Press enter to see a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hidong Kim wrote:
>[root@ripley init.d]# ./smb status
>smbd is stopped
>nmbd (pid 7759 7758) is running...
Show us the output of the samba error log. /var/log/messages won't
help you much here.
>/usr/include/asm/statfs.h:12: redefinition of `stru
Hi,
When I run testparm, it doesn't report any errors. But the strange
thing is that it's looking at /etc/local/samba/lib/smb.conf:
[root@ripley bin]# ./testparm
Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
Processing section "[public]"
Processing section "[public]"
Processing secti
Try running testparm and see the o/p.i guess it will tell u what the error
is
- Original Message -
From: "Hidong Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Red Hat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:25 PM
Subject: can't start samba
> Hi,
>
> I had been running Samba 2.2.1a on a Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 09:03
* ABrady said
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:53:30 -0500
> John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
>
> > If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another distro, what would
> > be the most similar, and easiest to accomplish
Hi,
It doesn't seem to run at all. What's really strange is that when I try
to start smb from the command line, I see:
[root@ripley init.d]# ./smb start
Starting SMB services: [ OK ]
Starting NMB services: [ OK ]
It
101 - 181 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
