unable to reach the internet now from the XP
> box. I didn't setup ip masquerading which is probably the problem.
>
> I was reading the IP Masquerade HOW-TO and got to the part about
> rc.firewall. My question is: Do I run iptables and rc.firewall? Or
> just rc.firewall?
I was trying to setup my RH 8.0 box to act as a gateway. Currently, I'm
using Win XP Pro. I just want to switch things around.
I got TKppoe working but am unable to reach the internet now from the XP
box. I didn't setup ip masquerading which is probably the problem.
I was read
I fixed the authentication warnings part by adding apache to the
/etc/mail/trusted-users file.
However i do not yet have the IP masquerading part working yet.
Kapil Khanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I reverted to back to my sendmail.cf back and tried using the macro as you
suggested
MASQUER
ly the hostname variable (and it needs to be the fully qualified
name i.e hostname=mydomain.com).
Is there something i need to do with hostname and domainname too, to achieve
IP masquerading?
Also why am i seeing authentication warning for Apache. I am using
Squirrelmail+courier-imap+sendmail
Thanks,
-
Nate
Sorry that was a typo. It is DM and not DN.
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kapil Khanna said:
> I am running RHAT 7.2. I want to masquerade email being sent from this
> machine as mydomain.com
> According to the docs i set the DN entry to be DNmydomain.com in the
you sure it's DN and not D
> -Original Message-
> From: Kapil Khanna
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:01 AM
> Subject: IP masquerading not working for sendmail
>
>
> I am running RHAT 7.2. I want to masquerade email being sent
> from this machine as mydomain.com. According to the docs
Kapil Khanna said:
> I am running RHAT 7.2. I want to masquerade email being sent from this
> machine as mydomain.com
> According to the docs i set the DN entry to be DNmydomain.com in the
you sure it's DN and not DM? last I checked it was DM
nate
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
I am running RHAT 7.2. I want to masquerade email being sent from this machine
as mydomain.com
According to the docs i set the DN entry to be DNmydomain.com in the
/etc/sendmail.cf file. I restarted sendmail (/etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail
restart).
I tried sending an email from this box. However masque
", IP Masquerading and
iptables. I now have W2k and iptables working, but IP Masquerading is still
not working. It seems that unlike RH 7.1 the 7.2 install did not install
the IP Masquerading modules, such as:
ipip
ip_masq_ftp
ip_masq_raudio, etc.
because they are reported as not found during
/Masquerading-Simple-HOWTO/
-t.
-Original Message-
From: BG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please help with IP Masquerading
thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL
thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pieter De Wit
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:55 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Please help with IP Masquerading
>
>
> Hello Bill,
>
Hello Bill,
Check if ipchains is loaded, otherwise just run "insmod ipchains" before the
whole script.
Cheers,
Pieter
-Original Message-
From: BG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 18:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please help with IP Masquerading
Hi Al
AIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edward Dekkers
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please help with IP Masquerading
This always worked fine on my old machine, but I get alot of errors during
boot on the new machine during run of rc.d. The error messages fly by so
fas
This always worked fine on my old machine, but I get alot of errors during
boot on the new machine during run of rc.d. The error messages fly by so
fast I can't read them. IP masquerading does not work on the new machine.
Please help.
Thanks,
Bill
---
Is ipchains even installed?
btw
Hi
All,
I have setup a new
dual boot machine with W2k and RH 7.2. I want to test the reliability and
speed differences between IP Masquerading and Internet Connection Sharing.
This new machine has 2 ethernet cards, one goes to the cable modem and the
other to the internal network
OK...
Well my masquerading problems pop back up... sometimes everything works
great for several hours, but usually there are problems.
Both computers have their MTUs set at 1500. Is that good? Any other
ideas?
Guess I'll break down and get a second ethernet card for the server if
there's not
Does this list have magical properties?
Literally as soon as I hit "send" on that post it seems to have been
working great! I even watched streaming video over C-Span on the
masq'ed box.
Thanks Justin -- if it starts up again I'll check into MTU stuff.
___
I had similar problels with ADSL, I remember hearing that it was related
to the packet sizes, you'll have to change the MTU size.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Micah Yoder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to masquerade a cable modem connection (static IP) with a
> couple other boxes. Problem is, from a mas
Hi,
I'm trying to masquerade a cable modem connection (static IP) with a
couple other boxes. Problem is, from a masq'ed box, the Internet seems
to work in "spurts" -- i.e. I can access a Web page and/or check my
mail, and it will usually complete the transaction... but then I try to
access anyth
Hi David.. FTP in passive mode works fine.. so thats what i am doing now :)
Anurag
---
At 10:05 AM 6/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Are you using ip_masq_ftp? You need to load this module to use FTP
>through ipchains. (This is in the masquerading FAQs somewhere, I'm
>sure.)
>
>-d
>
>--
>David Tal
Are you using ip_masq_ftp? You need to load this module to use FTP
through ipchains. (This is in the masquerading FAQs somewhere, I'm
sure.)
-d
--
David Talkington
Community Networking Initiative
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
244-1962
Anurag Jalan wrote:
: Hi all,
:
: I'm using ipchains masquerading
Hi all,
I'm using ipchains masquerading to provide NET access to my Lan. On my
Redhat 6.2 router box, I have just one rule : ipchains -A forward -j
MASQ -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0
and on my SuSE firewall/ISDN gateway I have ( its not much of a firewall
at the moment :-) )
ipchains
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:48:29AM +0200, Martin Reiser wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 03:04:41PM -0500, M. Smith wrote:
> >
> > There is a change in RH 6.2 regarding masquerading. Have to say they
> > did not do a real good job of highlighting this and I had to root
> > around to find
Martin Reiser wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 03:04:41PM -0500, M. Smith wrote:
>
> There is only IPCHAINS in my RH 62. The same is on ftp.redhat.com
>
> Where may I get IPTABLES ?
>
> Martin Reiser
>
Martin,
Later in the thread it was determined that IPTABLES is only for 2.3x
kernels. Running
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 03:04:41PM -0500, M. Smith wrote:
>
> There is a change in RH 6.2 regarding masquerading. Have to say they
> did not do a real good job of highlighting this and I had to root
> around to find it.
>
> 1. Version 6.2 no longer uses IPCHAINS. It is now IPTABLES. There is
Hal Burgiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 03:04:41PM -0500, M. Smith wrote:
> > Rick Knebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > i installed redhat 6.2 and set up IP masquerading the exact
> > > s
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 03:04:41PM -0500, M. Smith wrote:
>
> There is a change in RH 6.2 regarding masquerading. Have to say they
> did not do a real good job of highlighting this and I had to root
> around to find it.
>
> 1. Version 6.2 no longer uses IPCHAINS. It is now IPTABLES. There is a
>
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 03:04:41PM -0500, M. Smith wrote:
> Rick Knebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > i installed redhat 6.2 and set up IP masquerading the exact
> > same way I did
> > with 6.0 and 6.1 and it will not work.
> > My two
Rick Knebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i installed redhat 6.2 and set up IP masquerading the exact
> same way I did
> with 6.0 and 6.1 and it will not work.
> My two other computers will not connect to the internet
> through my linux
> box. i can ping the
is the answer but I have not tried it).
Bret
Rick Knebel wrote:
> Hi,
> i installed redhat 6.2 and set up IP masquerading the exact same way I did
> with 6.0 and 6.1 and it will not work.
> My two other computers will not connect to the internet through my linux
> box. i can ping
Hi,
i installed redhat 6.2 and set up IP masquerading the exact same way I did
with 6.0 and 6.1 and it will not work.
My two other computers will not connect to the internet through my linux
box. i can ping them though.
Has anyone else had this problem with 6.2?
Thanks
Rick
--
To
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael J. McGillick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 9:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IP Masquerading
>
>
> Evening:
>
> I have two Ethernet cards in my Linux box. I'm running
>
Charles:
This worked beautifully. Thanks. :)
- Mike
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> this should get you started. Stick this in /etc/rc.d/rc.local
>
> # IP Masquerading
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> /sbin/modprobe ipip.o
> /sbin
this should get you started. Stick this in /etc/rc.d/rc.local
# IP Masquerading
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
/sbin/modprobe ipip.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_irc.o
#/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_pptp.o
# sets timeouts to
Evening:
I have two Ethernet cards in my Linux box. I'm running ipchains. So far,
I've not set up anything with a Firewall blocking any of the three chains,
input, output or forward. They all have a default policy of accept. I
would like to start by making it so that my internal network,
192.
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
>
> > 1) Anyone know of some good how-to information that's not as
> > comprehensive as the VPN HOW-TO (targetted at using NT VPN client)
>
> Are you referring to the VPN Masq HOWTO at
> ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/
arles Boening <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:RE: IP Masquerading for Failsafe Internet Service?
Date sent: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 15:21:54 -0800
> Sorry ... that was the best I could
dge.
Any other ideas?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Keene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: IP Masquerading for Failsafe Internet Service?
>
> We recently added another ISP, so our system has two potential
> routes to the internet. I've set up
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
> 1) Anyone know of some good how-to information that's not as
> comprehensive as the VPN HOW-TO (targetted at using NT VPN client)
Are you referring to the VPN Masq HOWTO at
ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/ip_masq_vpn.html
> 2) Anyone know i
outes to the internet work properly from
the server; that is, if I pull the plug on one ISP pipe, I can reach the
internet through the other and vice versa.
However IP masquerading using ipchains doesn't work if the default
gateway for masquerading goes down. When that gateway is taken
Dont' get me wrong, I'm using it too. They are a (good) paying client, and
if they want to use NT, then like I said, it's fien by me :)
But welcome to the club anyway. I'd much prefer to get a plain old linux
pptp client working than use a win98 box through the gateway, but that
seeming simple ta
Charles Galpin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
>
> > Charles Galpin wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > My employer will allow me to use my cable modem to
> > > > connect to the corporate network with WinNT and VPN.
> > >
> > > pptp based e
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
> Charles Galpin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
> [...]
> > > My employer will allow me to use my cable modem to
> > > connect to the corporate network with WinNT and VPN.
> >
> > pptp based eh? better than nothing I guess
>
> Well, it
Charles Galpin wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
[...]
> > My employer will allow me to use my cable modem to
> > connect to the corporate network with WinNT and VPN.
>
> pptp based eh? better than nothing I guess
Well, it's built-in to NT and easy to support.
> > IIRC, one needs
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Wayne Dyer wrote:
> I know this isn't the list for this -- I'm looking for a pointer on where
> to find good info.
sure this is
> My employer will allow me to use my cable modem to
> connect to the corporate network with WinNT and VPN.
pptp based eh? better than nothin
I know this isn't the list for this -- I'm looking for a pointer on where
to find good info. My employer will allow me to use my cable modem to
connect to the corporate network with WinNT and VPN. However, I have
the Windows box behind the Linux box, and I don't want to pay extra for
another IP
Gordon,
Thank you for emailing me about this mess.Last night I compiled the
2.2.14 kernel with all of the same options and it is now working like a
charm. Quite strange, no?
Take care!
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Mary-Jo~
>
> There seems to be a number of entries missi
Mary-Jo~
There seems to be a number of entries missing from your kernel config.
I suggest that you run "make menuconfig" or "make xconfig". Check the
network options section for the masq modules. Make sure these are being
built as modules, and recompile.
Alternatively, you could use one of Re
I'm semi-new to Linux and I have been trying to setup my Linux box to do
IP masquerading for my home network. Read quite a few howtos over the
last few days. The two machines that I currently have configured can ping
each other. The client box can see both the ethernet card and the
stati
ple example there that is exactly what you are looking for.
That's all you need.
-JMS
-Original Message-
From: F.C. Barnard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP masquerading
Hi
Can anyone help me or explain to m
this.
Can this IP masquerading be done my netcfg? If so how do I do this. If I
can't do it that way how do I go about it. I throught I knew computers. I
suppose I was mistaken hehehe.
Thanks for any help.
F.C. Barnard
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
-Original Message-
From: Joel Robert Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, June 09, 1998 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: IP masquerading
>Make sure you're local to the machine !!! If you're telneting into it
>you'll
-Original Message-
From: Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Redhat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, June 09, 1998 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: IP masquerading
>Linux 5.0 has a nasty thing : Default all IP_Forwarding is O
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
> Reboot It ain't WIndow.
>
> Just do the following :
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/network start
>
Make sure you're local to the machine !!! If you're telneting into it
you'll have to haul your ass to whereve
>Change the line in /etc/sysconfig/network to =yes
>or throw this in your rc.local file
>echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>Either will do the same thing. (Though the first requires a reboot, >where
>the second doesn't. You could change the line in that file then issue >the
>echo command for
Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> change FORWARD_IPV4=false to FORWARD_IPV4=true
>
> then reboot. Should work now
Alternately, if you don't feel like rebooting to test your ip forwarding:
# echo '1' >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Of course, echo '0' will turn it back off again.
--
PLEASE read
>I am using Red Hat 5.0 on a AMD K6 with 32 Megs of RAM. I was >interested
in
>working with IP masquerading to provide my home network with >shared net
access
>through my Linux box. I have read the Mini-HOWTO on IP >Masquerading. I
did
>the following:
>Did I leave
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 08:32:24AM -0400, George Lenzer wrote:
>3. I issued the commands with 'ipfwadm' that the Mini-HOWTO specified. The
>default policy was set to deny. Then I issued a command to allow traffic from
>my network: (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 ) Again, I assumed that since all
, George Lenzer wrote:
>I am using Red Hat 5.0 on a AMD K6 with 32 Megs of RAM. I was interested in
>working with IP masquerading to provide my home network with shared net
access
>through my Linux box. I have read the Mini-HOWTO on IP Masquerading. I did
>the following:
>
>
I am using Red Hat 5.0 on a AMD K6 with 32 Megs of RAM. I was interested in
working with IP masquerading to provide my home network with shared net access
through my Linux box. I have read the Mini-HOWTO on IP Masquerading. I did
the following:
1. downloaded/uncompressed/installed Kernel
Site:
Jann> http://www.calendarplus.com/
Jann> -Original Message-
Jann> From: mel kravitz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Jann> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 1998 1:38 PM
Jann> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jann> Subject: Re: pasv command using ip-masquerading
Jann> Jann Li
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: pasv command using ip-masquerading
you know I just had the same problem I tested all my programs but not ftp I
have the same problem if you do find out let me know PLEASE and likewise
will send to you
> -Original Message-
> From: Jann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > > I simply asked how to enable pasv on a host.
at the ftp> prompt, type "passive" or "quot pasv" after logging in to the
host. Not all hosts support this mode, but most do.
As far as I know you have to do this _every_ time you run ftp. You migh
On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Jason Martin wrote:
> This option is necessary to traversing a IP_Masq gateway since the
> standard ftp protocol dynamicaly creates ports to talk to your local
> machine--but the masq system can't predict this and so doesn't know
> where to send the new port to.
Not quite tr
w.jann.com/
CalendarPlus Web Site:
http://www.calendarplus.com/
-Original Message-
From: mel kravitz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 1998 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: pasv command using ip-masquerading
Jann Linder wrote:
>
> I go
>> > > I simply asked how to enable pasv on a host.
The Can Use Passive FTP field specifies whether the remote
server allows use of the FTP Protocol's PASV command.
There are two ways to set up FTP connections. The default
way is what I call Port FTP. Unfortunately,
On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Matt Housh wrote:
> just configured diald incorrectly, but here's the problem: When I try to
> get to something outside from the gateway machine, it works great. Diald
> dials the modem and after it connects, whatever I'm trying (telnet, ssh,
> ftp, etc...) works. But I can't g
I think you missed some of my post. :) Like I said,
IP-Masquerading works perfectly. Thus, all of this has been done...
---
Matt Housh email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MicroComputer Specialist
Matt,
If it's any consolation, I can confirm the symptom. Although diald would kick
in correctly on the gateway machine, and although the rest my workstations
could then correctly access internet through the gateway machine, diald would
not kick in if it was the workstation trying to get out.
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Eric L. Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Matt Housh wrote:
> > just configured diald incorrectly, but here's the problem: When I try to
> > get to something outside from the gateway machine, it works great. Diald
> > dials the modem and after it connects,
Hello everyone, got a new problem. I have a small lan at home
consisting of 4 computers. One is set up with a modem and ethernet card as
gateway, and has IP-Masquerading set up on it. I tried to set up diald, so
anyone could make the gateway dial from the lan when trying to connect to
an
For heaven's sake, man, don't post a HOWTO to the entire mailing list! Helpful
as that might be, we don;t all need to get copies of it. Next time just email
the attachment directly to the person requesting it with perhaps a follow-up to
the iist indicating that you had done so.
--
Jake Colman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have been looking for a copy of "How-to IP Masquerading" if
> one exists(?) have been to sunsite/docs and the major Linux distributers
> etc. looking.
> If one exists could someone mail it to me or point me to a loca
>Hello,
>I have been looking for a copy of "How-to IP Masquerading" if
>one exists(?) have been to sunsite/docs and the major Linux >distributers
>etc. looking.
>If one exists could someone mail it to me or point me to a location
>that has it
It is in the /usr/do
On Thursday, May 28, 1998 4:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Hello,
> I have been looking for a copy of "How-to IP Masquerading" if
> one exists(?) have been to sunsite/docs and the major Linux distributers
> etc. looking.
> If one exists
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 2:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IP - Masquerading
>
>
> Hello,
> I have been looking for a copy of "How-to IP Masquerading" if
> one exists(?) have been to sunsite/docs and the major Linux dist
> I have been looking for a copy of "How-to IP Masquerading"
http://ipmasq.home.ml.org/
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardinPGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5
Check the HOWTO directory on the redhat CDRom or at the redhat ftp site.
It's there!
Pete
At 02:43 AM 5/28/98 +0800, you wrote:
>Hello,
> I have been looking for a copy of "How-to IP Masquerading" if
>one exists(?) have been to sunsite/docs and the major Linux di
Hello,
I have been looking for a copy of "How-to IP Masquerading" if
one exists(?) have been to sunsite/docs and the major Linux distributers
etc. looking.
If one exists could someone mail it to me or point me to a location
that has it
thks
barry
--
PLEASE read the R
> About 2 - 3 weeks ago someone posted an email with a URL for firewalling
> and ip masquerading with a subject of newbie something. i am looking for
> that URL as my Fujitsu drive became cannibalistic and ate itself I lost
> all the good info I had been hoarding. Win some, lose som
uter SpecialistUniversity of Tulsa
Engineering and Natural Sciences
"Pardon me, stewardess. I speak Jive."
On Thu, 14 May 1998, Paul Fontenot wrote:
> About 2 - 3 weeks ago someone posted an email with a URL for firewalling
> and ip masque
About 2 - 3 weeks ago someone posted an email with a URL for firewalling
and ip masquerading with a subject of newbie something. i am looking for
that URL as my Fujitsu drive became cannibalistic and ate itself I lost
all the good info I had been hoarding. Win some, lose some...
-Paul
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Jyan-Min Fang wrote:
> I've followed the IP-Masquerade mini howto to setup my system. However,
> there is one minor question I like to ask. In the 'Configuring Windows 95'
> section of the Howto, it didn't mention what need to be put in in the
> DNS/Configuration section's 'Ho
> I've followed the IP-Masquerade mini howto to setup my system. However,
> there is one minor question I like to ask. In the 'Configuring Windows 95'
> section of the Howto, it didn't mention what need to be put in in the
> DNS/Configuration section's 'Host' and 'Domain' (the two blocks just abo
Hi,
Since these refer to the Win95 machine, and that machine is on the private
side of your network, you can put anything that you want there. The
general concept is to be in the format of host.domain. So, for your win95
machine you could put the host as 'win95' and the domain as 'my.domain' fo
27;Host' and 'Domain' (the two blocks just above
> the DNS Server Search Order). Window 95 insists these two blocks be
> filled, if DNS is enabled. Any idea? Thanks
Back when I used to use IP Masquerading, on the Win95 Box, I generally
used the domain of my ISP (i.e. southco
Hi,
I've followed the IP-Masquerade mini howto to setup my system. However,
there is one minor question I like to ask. In the 'Configuring Windows 95'
section of the Howto, it didn't mention what need to be put in in the
DNS/Configuration section's 'Host' and 'Domain' (the two blocks just above
t
> question:
>
> Is IP-masquerading at all feasible in the case of dynamic allocation of the
> IP-address by the ISP?
Absolutely. I (and many others) do it every day.
> The IP-masquerading mini Howto (as published in "Doctor Linus" by Red Hat)
> seems to assume a
>Is IP-masquerading at all feasible in the case of dynamic allocation of
>the IP-address by the ISP?
Absolutely I have 4 machines here using this box as the gateway to the
'net, this box being connected to my isp on dynamic IP# assignment.
I think what you are getting at though
After lurking for several months on this interesting list and learning a lot in this
way, this is the first time in my life I actually try to post to any list. I hope I
did it right.
question:
Is IP-masquerading at all feasible in the case of dynamic allocation of the IP-address
by the ISP
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Manchung Hon wrote:
>I share a 56K modem connection among the three computers in my home. I am
>very happy with it. But sometimes one machine will start downloading some
>huge files and those interactive sessions like telnet on another machine
>will get really slow. I am wonde
I share a 56K modem connection among the three computers in my home. I am
very happy with it. But sometimes one machine will start downloading some
huge files and those interactive sessions like telnet on another machine
will get really slow. I am wondering if there is a way to limit the shares
o
92 matches
Mail list logo
