Karthikeyan Sankaran wrote:
Hi,
I am Karthik from India. I have a problem which i am seeing in most sendmail/fetchmail servers. May be someone faced this problem(Mail looping problem )before. Problem is, say i have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] as pop3 ids and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my l
At 7/8/2003 15:09 -0400, you wrote:
I tried what you suggested. But I changed the IP address to the IP address
of my Exchange server?
The email doesn't work when I do this.
Here are the rules as of now.
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn -s 10.2.2.120/32 --destination-port 22
-j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip
Will do.
Thanks
Mark
-Original Message-
From: aljuhani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
Hello Mark,
No problems but as you mentioned may be as this is a redhat-list, we may
have been slightly off
gt; -Original Message-
> From: aljuhani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
>
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong here but the way I see it that:
>
> Linux Server is trying to se
8 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
Please correct me if I am wrong here but the way I see it that:
Linux Server is trying to send email to a windows MS Exchange server.
IPtables on the Linux Server blocking port 25 (smtp) and that is why your
error logs shows that localhost
replace the IP in your rule with your linux IP address.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Drozd, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 22:09
Subject: RE: Sendmail problem
> I tried what you suggested. But I
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
Ok then add this RULE to the top before the DROP rule
and restart your firewall.
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn -s 10.2.2.120/32 --destination-port 25
-j ACCEPT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Drozd, Mark" &l
TED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 21:43
Subject: RE: Sendmail problem
> These are the only rules as this is a client workstation.
>
> Mark
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: aljuhani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:38 PM
> To:
These are the only rules as this is a client workstation.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: aljuhani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
> Found the problem.
>
> IPTABLES was set for the following
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
>
>
> At 7/8/2003 13:19 -0400, you wrote:
> >I upgraded the machine to RH 9.0. Now the email doesn't work. I keep
> >receiving (Connection timed out) in the log file.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sendmail problem
At 7/8/2003 14:02 -0400, you wrote:
>Found the problem.
>
>IPTABLES was set for the following;
>/sbin
At 7/8/2003 14:02 -0400, you wrote:
Found the problem.
IPTABLES was set for the following;
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn -s 10.2.2.120/32 --destination-port 22
-j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn -s 10.2.2.120/32 --destination-port
1241 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --
IPTABLES it works fine. Yet, this is the same way I had
IPTABLES set in RH 7.2.
Thanks for your help,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
At 7/8/2003 13:19 -0400
At 7/8/2003 13:19 -0400, you wrote:
I upgraded the machine to RH 9.0. Now the email doesn't work. I keep
receiving (Connection timed out) in the log file. I set up the sendmail.cf
file with a smart host(Dsmail.mydomain.com) and a masquerade
(Dmmydomain.com). This is how the previous version was
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Humphrey
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 2:18 PM
> Subject: RE: sendmail problem
>
>
> OK, I have narrowed it down. Fixed the smtp issue on dogbert,
> but now if I try to email my work email ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> from dogb
Cowles, Steve
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:32 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: sendmail problem
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Humphrey
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:11 PM
> Subject: sendmail problem
>
>
> I set my server {dogbert.rhumphrey
> I set my server {dogbert.rhumphrey.com} to relay all mail through
> {ratbert.rhumphrey.com} and when I try to send an email from dogbert to
> an external email address i get the following error(s) in my log on
> ratbert. What else do I need to configure? I set smtp smarthost in
> dogbert to relay
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Humphrey
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:11 PM
> Subject: sendmail problem
>
>
> I set my server {dogbert.rhumphrey.com} to relay all mail through
> {ratbert.rhumphrey.com} and when I try to send an email from
> dogbert to an external email address i
> -Original Message-
> From: Ashley M. Kirchner
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 5:55 PM
> Subject: Sendmail problem
>
> So I wonder if there isn't a way where mail would just
> spool up on the outgoing server, so that these internal clients
> would still be able to (seemingly) send mai
On 10-Mar-2003/16:54 -0700, "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>This may not be specific to Red Hat only, but I figured I'd post
>here before I dive into sendmail's news group. Normally, we don't have
>any problems at all with our mail, however today we were faced with an
>un
handle
that.
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikkel L. Ellertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sendmail problem
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Mingle, Michael wrote:
>
> > I hav
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Mingle, Michael wrote:
> I have 2 Linux servers on a small test LAN. I am trying to setup
> sendmail properly. I have configured the proper MX records in the DNS
> database. I have setup Sendmail to allow connections other than
> localhost (127.0.0.1). Only one of the servers
PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope... That didnt work.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kapil Khanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Sendmail problem]
>
>
> Michael,
> I had a similar problem. I had o
Nope... That didnt work.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kapil Khanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Sendmail problem]
>
>
> Michael,
> I had a similar problem. I had one linux server that
Michael,
I had a similar problem. I had one linux server that i was sending mail from.
When i send mail from that machine to the outside world the mail had
information that it was coming from localhost.localadmin.
I tried to use the masquerade_as functionality but that itself did not work.
In addit
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony E. Greene
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 7:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Sendmail Problem
>
> Your NS records for icesource.com look strange too. I'm not a
> BIND guru, but it doesn't seem right to have the name
On 22-Feb-2003/10:39 -0800, Nicholas Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There is already an MX record for mail.icesource.com. I'd love to fix
>sendmail as you say, but how do you do it? I've tried everything that
>remotely looks like it might help and nothing seems to work. I am the
>ISP, wh
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
> Well, I think we've gotten to the root of the problem here. I went and
> looked and sure enough, there was no MX record for the icesource.com
> domain. I must have completely spaced out on that when I set up the
> records on the new server. Needless to say, that fixed it
ter a change.
Nick
Cowles, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Fitzgerald
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: Sendmail Problem
Well, that's the rub. IceSource.com is a web domain hosted
on this very server. The mail server, mail.icesource.
nate said:
> There is no MX record for icesource.com. So sendmail connects to
> icesource.com's IP to deliver the message.
correction, when I queried the MX for icesource.com last night there
was no MX entry reported, but today there is.
though my local nameservers for some reason just stopped g
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
On 22-Feb-2003/07:22 -0500, "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your RH8 box (dns) is not accepting incoming SMTP connections from the
network. When you create the 'MX' record for icesource.com, it should
point to mail.icesource.com. The 'A' re
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
> Well, that's the rub. IceSource.com is a web domain hosted on this very
> server. The mail server, mail.icesource.com, is on another box entierly.
> Nowhere am I telling sendmail to go to icesource.com, in fact, it's the
> domain sending the email to sendmail. I think th
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:06:17PM -0800, nate wrote:
> second one is to enable sendmail to recieve connections on
> the ethernet interface. The proper way would be to edit
> /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuild sendmail.cf but you can
> edit sendmail.cf directly(reccomend backing it up first).
> Look
On 22-Feb-2003/07:22 -0500, "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Your RH8 box (dns) is not accepting incoming SMTP connections from the
>network. When you create the 'MX' record for icesource.com, it should
>point to mail.icesource.com. The 'A' record can continue to point to
>'dns'.
Cr
On 22-Feb-2003/00:32 -0800, Nicholas Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, that's the rub. IceSource.com is a web domain hosted on this very
>server. The mail server, mail.icesource.com, is on another box entierly.
>Nowhere am I telling sendmail to go to icesource.com, in fact, it's the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicholas Fitzgerald
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 2:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Sendmail Problem
>
>
> Well, that's the rub. IceSource.com is a web domain hosted
> on this very server. The mail server, mail.icesource.com,
> is on
Well, that's the rub. IceSource.com is a web domain hosted on this very server.
The mail server, mail.icesource.com, is on another box entierly. Nowhere
am I telling sendmail to go to icesource.com, in fact, it's the domain sending
the email to sendmail. I think this points me in the right dire
On 21-Feb-2003/20:52 -0800, Nicholas Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
The last log entry is the key:
>Feb 21 20:40:12 dns sendmail[19531]: h1M4eCqe019529:
>to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (48/48),
>delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=30387,
>relay=ic
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail Problem
nate wrote:
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
I'm running RedHad 8.0. Now that I think of it, the last 7.3 server I
worked with didn't have this problem. Too bad RedHat can't see their way
clear to upgrade the pa
Thanks, I went ahead and set up a smart host to my mail server and now everything
works fine. I always knew about that as a possible solutions, but I didn't
want to do it if I didn't have to. That server gets a lot of work as it is.
That does solve the problem, but I would like to be able to se
Networks, Inc.
(727) 723-8388
-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Nicholas Fitzgerald
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003
11:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sendmail Problem
nate wrote:
Nicholas Fitzgerald said: I'm ru
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
> Feb 21 20:40:12 dns
> sendmail[19531]: h1M4eCqe019529: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (48/48), delay=00:00:00,
> xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=30387, relay=icesource.com.
> [66.12.123.173], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by
> ice
nate wrote:
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
I'm running RedHad 8.0. Now that I think of it, the last 7.3 server I
worked with didn't have this problem. Too bad RedHat can't see their way
clear to upgrade the packages for it like apache and php to something a
bit more current. I tried th
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
> I'm running RedHad 8.0. Now that I think of it, the last 7.3 server I
> worked with didn't have this problem. Too bad RedHat can't see their way
> clear to upgrade the packages for it like apache and php to something a
> bit more current. I tried the test you used up th
nate wrote:
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
Who's idea was it to leave sendmail useless on install?
probably a good idea. red hat has a long history of being targets
for exploits since it traditionally had a buncha stuff turned on
by default, and many users did not know what w
Nicholas Fitzgerald said:
> Who's idea was it to leave sendmail useless on install?
probably a good idea. red hat has a long history of being targets
for exploits since it traditionally had a buncha stuff turned on
by default, and many users did not know what was running so did
not know to shut it
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Huang
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Sendmail Problem
>
>
> I've solved the problem in a very strange way!
>
> I used to "cp /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail".
> I remo
s,
Leo
- Original Message -
From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: Sendmail Problem
> Leo Huang wrote:
>
> >The sendmail has two "things", "sendmail"
Leo Huang wrote:
>The sendmail has two "things", "sendmail" and "sm-client". "sm-client" is
>the submision program, not the daemon. It runs as user smmsp. However, it's
>not a good idea to run apache as "smmsp" or "chown apache
>/var/spool/clientmqueue".
>
>BTW, the apache could do the job with th
quot;.
BTW, the apache could do the job with the same permission before I updated
the sendmail rpm.
Thanks for your reply,
Leo
- Original Message -
From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:34 PM
Subject: R
: Sendmail Problem
Looks like the user "apache" doesn't have
permission to create a file in this dir. I don't know what this
directory is for...
Jim
- Original Message -
From:
Leo Huang
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 2
Leo Huang wrote:
> Hello, I updated the sendmail rpm, and I received this error when I
> tried to submit the form from Apache. Please tell me what has gone
> wrong. Sendmail works well with imap, smtp and pop3. Error from
> maillog: Jan 27 22:47:54 localhost sendmail[3092]: NOQUEUE:
> SYSERR(apach
Looks like the user "apache" doesn't have
permission to create a file in this dir. I don't know what this directory
is for...
Jim
- Original Message -
From:
Leo Huang
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:00
PM
Subject: Sendmail Problem
Hell
I could be wrong, but @abcd.net is telling it to map [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
admin. This would probably explain it.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "sixx lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:04:14 +0800
Subject: Sendmail problem
> Hi there,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: RH
> Subject: Sendmail problem ?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I run Rh 7.1.
> When I do sendmail -v, I get the following
>
> Warning: .cf file is out of date: sendmail 8.11.2 supports
> version 9, .cf file is version 8
Like the warning says -- your current sendmail.cf i
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Teodor Georgiev
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002
6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail problem
1. look in your /etc/hosts ... you
will understand part of the problem.
2. How *exactly* your form is
sending the mail
1. look in your /etc/hosts ... you will understand
part of the problem.
2. How *exactly* your form is sending the mail?
:)
T.G.
- Original Message -
From:
Ricardo J. Michell
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:24
AM
Subject: sendma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, ebinc wrote:
>Does anyone know what line in the sendmail config file I need to add
>smtpout.bellatlantic.net to get it to work, I have a form I need emailed
>from the server. but I cant get it to work.
Okay, let me get this stra
ne calls itself www, that's not some weirdness)
Any ideas?
Warren Melnick
Director of Research and Development
Astata Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Seyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:03:33PM -0500, Warren Melnick a ecrit:
> This one is weird:
>
> Whenever I send an email, sendmail gives me something like this:
> Mar 19 16:50:55 www sendmail[399]: QAA00397: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp,
> rela
Your sendmail config is set to throttle (stop accepting connections) when
the load average peaks over a certain number.
Edit you sendmail.cf file (/etc/sendmail.cf was the default with
6.2). Look for a line like the following:
O RefuseLA=12
Increase the number (in this case 12), save the fi
On Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:05 PM, Sergio Pereira
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
| Hi all,
| I use RH6.2 wiht sendmail 8.9 and I have a lot of list (petidomo).
| So,
| somo times (by ps ax command) I see a message :
| --cut--
| 16232 ?S 0:00 sendmail: rejecting connections on p
Ken,
That doesn't look to me like it's a problem on your end. You stated that
this happens quite regularly. Is that with one particular recipient
domain (or server), or randomly with anyone?
It looks to me like the recipient mail host accepted the letter, but was
unable to deliver it locally f
Eddie,
Eddie Strohmier wrote:
> Ken:
>
> When someone sends one of these e-mails and it bounces back what does
> /var/log/maillog say or can you give us a snip of /var/log/maillog so as to
> get more of a clue as to how sendmail is handling the mail.
That's the funny bit. I cannot find an entr
Ken:
When someone sends one of these e-mails and it bounces back what does
/var/log/maillog say or can you give us a snip of /var/log/maillog so as to
get more of a clue as to how sendmail is handling the mail.
Eddie Strohmier
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Ganbold wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I have some problem with sendmail.
>
> I installed Mdaemon in Windows NT for dial-up mail server. It dials to
> Linux server and connects using one user account tuv. And this tuv account
> receives all mail directed to *@tuv.pmis.go
Go herehttp://www.moongroup.com/mailhelp.phtml to find ways of
controlling Sendmail
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 11/01/00 at 9:46 Niels Wagenaar wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>Got a slide problem concerning Sendmail.
>
Regards
Greg Wright
IT Consultant Sydney Australia
--
Disregard this message. I figured it out.
On Sat, 4 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I set up a RedHat 5.0 machine this week. And everything is working fine
> except for one thing. I get the following message in my maillog:
>
> sendmail[12975]: NOQUEUE: Null connection from root@
>
> T
68 matches
Mail list logo
