On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:49:38AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2003 03:50, T. Ribbrock wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
snip
At work, I use Mozilla 1.4. So far, I haven't had any serious
problems with any pages, short of the fact that I haven's
On Thursday 10 July 2003 21:01, Ed Wilts wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Doesn't Mozilla support IMAP? I know it supports POP3 (secure and
insecure) on multiple ports. It's easy to configure, too
I've
On Friday 11 July 2003 03:50, T. Ribbrock wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
snip
At work, I use Mozilla 1.4. So far, I haven't had any serious
problems with any pages, short of the fact that I haven's installed a
flash player yet (installer fails).
Cheerio,
Thomas
On Thursday 10 July 2003 14:48, Edward Croft wrote this in an attempt to
be witty and informative:
snip
Hmmm, while I can understand why 'you' may not want HTML, there are a
lot of people who do like it. They feel they have more freedom to
dress up their emails, plus they can get online
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:48:39AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
On Thursday 10 July 2003 21:01, Ed Wilts wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Doesn't Mozilla support IMAP? I know it supports POP3 (secure
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:48:39AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
On Thursday 10 July 2003 21:01, Ed Wilts wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Doesn't Mozilla support IMAP? I know it supports
On Saturday 12 July 2003 11:06, Ed Wilts wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:48:39AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
On Thursday 10 July 2003 21:01, Ed Wilts wrote this in an attempt
to be
witty and informative:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at
On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 22:32, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
On Saturday 12 July 2003 11:06, Ed Wilts wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:48:39AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
snip
Real world reality again. Life sucks don't it? Their ISP starter
On Saturday 12 July 2003 23:02, Bret Hughes wrote this in an attempt to
be witty and informative:
snip
I can snail mail them Mozilla, OpenOffice, and pretty much anything
else you think they would need.
--
and way faster that a dl of any of them. Probably faster than the
time it takes
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:28:54PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:15:56PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
Well, mutt works nicely with IMAP under cygwin... ;-)
My wife and I have been married for just about 25 years, and if I want
to live to see 26, I won't give her mutt under
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:01:38PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
I've done a lot of work with mozilla and netscape, but unfortunately, on
Windows, nothing touches IE. Too many webmasters assume IE and won't
work properly with anything else.
[...]
At work, I use Mozilla 1.4. So far, I haven't had any
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:14:20 +0200
Leonard den Ottolander [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
Hi Benjamin,
I tried pegasus mail before, but when I tried it, it didn't understand
imap/tls or smtp/tls.
Still using Pegasus 3, which doesn't support IMAP yet, so I can't comment on
that issue.
El vie, 11-07-2003 a las 12:37, Michael Scottaline escribió:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:14:20 +0200
Leonard den Ottolander [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
Hi Benjamin,
I tried pegasus mail before, but when I tried it, it didn't understand
imap/tls or smtp/tls.
Still using Pegasus
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:29:56PM -0500, Stephen Smith wrote:
ok!
click on tools - options - send - and take the check out of reply int he
format message was sent in
Hope that helps everyone else who was wondering also.
No. There's no send under Tools - Options in the Outhouse I have
on
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:53:01PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
We are drifting slightly off topic here, but if you need a decent mailer
under Windows you should try Pegasus mail (http://www.pmail.com). It's the
main reason I still keep rebooting between Windows and Linux on this
Hi Reuben,
Are you saying you're booting to Windows to get a decent mail client?
I expressed myself a little poorly. I actually ment to say two things:
1) If you need a decent mail program under Windows please drop Outlook
(Express) and use Pegasus Mail. Very nice program, no problem with
. :(
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: Had enough
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:53:01PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
We are drifting slightly off topic here, but if you need a decent
mailer
under
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:00:39AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
I tried pegasus mail before, but when I tried it, it didn't understand
imap/tls or smtp/tls. So far, the only windows client I've found that
does these two correctly is outlook/outlook epxress. Which is too bad,
because I
At 08:00 AM 7/10/2003, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote :
I tried pegasus mail before, but when I tried it, it didn't understand
imap/tls or smtp/tls. So far, the only windows client I've found that
does these two correctly is outlook/outlook epxress. Which is too bad,
because I have to use windows here
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 14:51, Keith Morse wrote:
Also, I've heard that this can be manipulated by the Exchange server (if
you're using one) to always do email via html no matter what your client
is set to do.
Very true. I was actually questioned by the CEO at my previous company
because I
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 15:11, Andrew Schott wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 14:51, Keith Morse wrote:
Also, I've heard that this can be manipulated by the Exchange server (if
you're using one) to always do email via html no matter what your client
is set to do.
Very true. I was actually
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:11:40PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
I've tried a ton of Windows e-mail packages, and most really suck at
imap. Eudora, surprisingly enough, is great at pop but sucks at imap.
[...]
Well, mutt works nicely with IMAP under cygwin... ;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
== RH List
Hi Benjamin,
I tried pegasus mail before, but when I tried it, it didn't understand
imap/tls or smtp/tls.
Still using Pegasus 3, which doesn't support IMAP yet, so I can't comment on
that issue.
Which is too bad,
because I have to use windows here at work, and I'd rather use something
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:15:56PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:11:40PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
I've tried a ton of Windows e-mail packages, and most really suck at
imap. Eudora, surprisingly enough, is great at pop but sucks at imap.
[...]
Well, mutt works nicely
On Thursday 10 July 2003 18:28, Ed Wilts wrote this in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:15:56PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:11:40PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
I've tried a ton of Windows e-mail packages, and most really suck
at imap.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Doesn't Mozilla support IMAP? I know it supports POP3 (secure and
insecure) on multiple ports. It's easy to configure, too
I've done a lot of work with mozilla and netscape, but unfortunately, on
Windows, nothing touches IE.
I hope you find out, because I would like to know that as well. I use
Outlook at work and all my coworkers use HTMLblah
--
Richard Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The goys have proven the
Mark,
Try tools, options, send to solve problem. or tools, account...etc
- Original Message -
From: Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RedHat Mailing List (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Had enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Haney said:
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply to
someone who sent an email in HTML, my reply is in HTML too. And I'm
pretty sick of getting the auto-respond from this list about it.
I
What I do in outlook express is force the reply to be in
plain text from Compose window's Format option.
Crude but effective.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 14:17, Mark Haney wrote in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply to
someone who sent an email in HTML, my reply is in HTML too. And
Mark Haney mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply to
someone who sent an email in HTML, my reply is in HTML too. And I'm
pretty sick of getting the auto-respond from
: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: Had enough
I hope you find out, because I would like to know that as well. I use
Outlook at work and all my coworkers use HTMLblah
--
Richard Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Richard Humphrey wrote:
I hope you find out, because I would like to know that as well. I use
Outlook at work and all my coworkers use HTMLblah
Also, I've heard that this can be manipulated by the Exchange server (if
you're using one) to always do email via html no
Mark,
On Wednesday July 09, 2003 03:17, Mark Haney wrote:
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply to
someone who sent an email in HTML, my reply is in HTML too. And I'm
pretty sick of getting the
Title: RE: Had enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
click on tools - options - send - and take the check out of reply
int he
format message was sent in
Okay, this only works in Outlook Express. I'm running pure Outlook.
Unfortunately I can't run RH completely on my laptop
For OE 6..
tools options send tab
uncheck the option to reply in the format in which it was sent.
d
- Original Message -
From: Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RedHat Mailing List (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:17 PM
Subject: Had enough
-BEGIN
Title: RE: Had enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, FYI, here's what I found (Cut and Pasted from the page since
it's a long text document). Note the warning: There's no way to do
this for all messages in Outlook 2000. It's _per message_ only.
Outlook 2000
* Select
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 14:39, Mark Haney wrote in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
click on tools - options - send - and take the check out of reply
int he
format message was sent in
Okay, this only works in Outlook Express. I'm running pure Outlook.
Unfortunately I can't run RH
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 14:46, Mark Haney wrote in an attempt to be
witty and informative:
snip
WARNING: Outlook 2000 uses what Microsoft calls Auto Format Reply.
Due to the variety of message formats supported by different e-mail
clients, Outlook 2000 ensures that e-mail recipients receive
But.. remember - you pay for this because it's for your own good and
only Uncle Billy know what's good for you
- Original Message -
From: Joseph A Nagy Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: Had enough
On Wednesday 09
Would recommend locating one of the Outlook/OE groups on usenet ... don't
think many here use it...
Rene
At 20:31 09-07-2003, you wrote:
Mark Haney said:
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply to
Hi Mark,
We are drifting slightly off topic here, but if you need a decent mailer
under Windows you should try Pegasus mail (http://www.pmail.com). It's the
main reason I still keep rebooting between Windows and Linux on this machine.
Bye,
Leonard.
--
How clean is a war when you shoot around
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 05:17, Mark Haney wrote:
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply to
someone who sent an email in HTML, my reply is in HTML too. And I'm
pretty sick of getting the auto-respond
-Original Message-
From: Mark Haney
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:18 PM
Subject: Had enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 04:53 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi Mark,
We are drifting slightly off topic here, but if you need a decent mailer
under Windows you should try Pegasus mail (http://www.pmail.com). It's the
main reason I still keep rebooting between Windows and Linux on this
Okay, I've had it. Does ANYONE know how to turn off replying to HTML
emails as HTML in Outlook? I default to text, but when I reply to
someone who sent an email in HTML, my reply is in HTML too. And I'm
pretty sick of getting the auto-respond from this list about it.
Um, I hate to be a
Cowles, Steve mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I try to be a good net/list citizen, there are times I do
not have the time to convert an html e-mail to text, but I have an
answer to someones post. Yes, the initial conversion step is easy...
format-plain text, but
then I must also
Chris W. Parker wrote:
Cowles, Steve wrote:
Although I try to be a good net/list citizen, there are times I do
not have the time to convert an html e-mail to text, but I have an
answer to someones post. Yes, the initial conversion step is easy...
format-plain text, but then I must also
Cowles, Steve mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must have missed your reply out of the 23 in this thread.
No problem, I was just giving you a hard time. :)
Anyway,
thanks for the referral to Quotefix. When I converted an HTML message
to plain text, quotefix kicked in and properly indented the
50 matches
Mail list logo
