Dali
Check you /etc/lilo.conf, look for directive called "default" it should
reference the linux kernel you want to boot from. (assuming you are using
lilo and not grub).
if you used up2date, then you dont need to change anythin.
Saqib Ali
-
http://validate.sourceforge.net
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 12:06, Dali Islam wrote:
> I have loaded a new kernel. Now what do I need to
> change so that when the system boots, it boot with the
> new kernel?
>
> Can I run a script to do that. If so what can that be.
It's even easier than a script (IMHO). You did
I have loaded a new kernel. Now what do I need to
change so that when the system boots, it boot with the
new kernel?
Can I run a script to do that. If so what can that be.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http
- read
> only file system
>
>
>
> I really hasn't a clue from where does this "read only file system"
> error stems.
>
> So Still i cannot boot my RH 9 ;
> what shall I do ?
>
> regards,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try using the --root option.
rpm -Uv
only file system" error
stems.
So Still i cannot boot my RH 9 ;
what shall I do ?
regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
redhat-l
Chris Purcell wrote
> I had this same problem a few weeks ago. I was able to fix it and wrote
> an FAQ on it at tek-tips.com.
>
> http://www.tek-tips.com/gfaqs.cfm/lev2/3/lev3/20/pid/54/fid/4094
It's worth noting that the reason you had this problem is that you "upgraded"
from the i686 glibc rpm
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:33:05PM +0200, sting sting wrote:
> I get the follwoing errors at start:
> (befor reaching Login)
> NIT:Id"1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
> INIT:Id"2" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
> INIT:Id"3" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
> IN
> Hello ,
> Help !
> I have severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and
> glibc-common on RedHat 9 ;
> I had glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i686.rpm
> I wanted to update to glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm.
> rpm -Uvh glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm said it needs updated glibc-commo
Hello ,
Help !
I have severe problem (cannot boot) after upgrading glibc and glibc-common
on RedHat 9 ;
I had glibc-2.3.2-11.9.i686.rpm
I wanted to update to glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm.
rpm -Uvh glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm said it needs updated glibc-common.
I had glibc-common-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm
if u use -Uvh, then if your new kernel installation is having problems, you
will not be able to boot back to your previous kernel.
using -U typically removes your old kernel files and install the new kernel
files.will be installed even if the package is not install in the system
using -F is
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:44:40PM +0800, Daniel Tan wrote:
> try installing kernels using -ivh instead of -Fvh next time
>
For us newbies, why wouldn't you use -Uvh?
up2date seems to handle this stuff pretty gracefully, so I've not messed w/ just
changing the kernel.
Thanx,
Earl
--
redhat-
try installing kernels using -ivh instead of -Fvh next time
- Original Message -
From: "Allen Wayne Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Red Hat Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 7:47 AM
Subject: partition check error at boot t
6.rpm), i rebooted.
now, a most mysterious thing is happening. during boot, i get the following
message
attached scsi removable disk sda at scsi 0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
sda Read Capacity Failed
sda status = 1, message = 0, host 0, driver 08
current sd 00:00, sense key not ready
Additional
Hi,
I used GHost 7.5 with the sector copy enabled to clone
a Win2K/RH9-SGI_XFS partitions via ethernet.
The boot disk was easy to create so I would try v7.5.
The copy took 1 hour for a 40GB drive via 100baseT.
Bri-
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping
Hi all,
A question related to Symantec Ghost 7.0 ,
Could someone tell me how to create a boot disk i mean which option i chose to
create an image of a OS with service packs and other softwares and store it
on one location and then copy it over to a target machine..
How to go abt ?
Thanks and
--- Srini Amble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have
loaded RH7.2 on dual Xeon server with Promise
> RAID. I followed
> the directions as given in the "Linux ATA RAID
> HOWTO" for RH 7.2.
>
> When I try to boot off the Hard DIsk the kernel
> hangs. T
I have loaded RH7.2 on dual Xeon server with Promise RAID. I followed
the directions as given in the "Linux ATA RAID HOWTO" for RH 7.2.
When I try to boot off the Hard DIsk the kernel hangs. The meesage I see
on the console is:
"request_module [block-major-8]: Root fs not moun
=
Other errors were reported, but they based on the fact that the proc filesystem was
not mounted. The boot continued to line 182 of rc.sysint and stopped.
I ran a memory test and a file system check. No error were found.
How can get the machine to reboot with out having to loose all of the
RedHat9 linux /boot, /, and swap partition.
The dual-boot system was set up in this way.
The WinXP partition is the active one. I use the Windows XP Boot manager
to offer Windows XP and Linux. (I used the BOOTPART tool from
www.image.com/bootpart.htm to add a Linux option)
Choosing Linux
How do I build a boot diskette that'll allow me to boot from an usb disk
drive ?
I could install rh9 on it (using expert mode to load usb-storage module)
and built the boot diskette at end of install but when I boot with it I get
a kernel panic, error 6 when mounting ext2...
tia
--
r
is a WLAN card, loaded by orinoco_pci.
During boot, the laptop tries to initiate eth0, but after a few seconds
it gives an error, asking me please as to check if the network cable is
present (unless, of course, a network cable *is* present, then it
proceeds and gives eth0 an IP-address).
But:
Hi,
I got excellent answers concerning mysql og
httpd start as services, and have a question
in relation to this subject.
I have looked into what happens at boot, but
I don't have a deeper understanding of it
yet. Therefore, I don't know if it is
possible/advisable to change the se
. Below is my grub.conf file and raid1 is working
perfectly. Yanking drives w/ the help of raidsetfaulty and
raidhotremove works. Adding them works as well as booting w/ only one
drive Something that lilo only allowed if it was hda.
default=0
timeout=10
splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub
I have several systems with identical hardware that all have software
raid1 running on RH9 on hot-swappable serial ata drives.
One of our machines has developed a problem recently. Running 'lilo -v'
used to write out boot sectors info for both drivers - now it only does
one drive
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:03 pm, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> This is news to me. I didn't know that windows would even boot from a
> slave drive. Good info if it is true.
Yes it would. I've done what is basically the describe by Ed using LILO. If
you need it, I can p
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Edward Croft
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Red Hat List
Subject: RE: I can't boot Windows XP with Grub loader.
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:37, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> You are saying h
Good info!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Edward Croft
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:48 PM
> To: Red Hat List
> Subject: RE: I can't boot Windows XP with Grub loader.
>
> On Tue, 2003-09
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:37, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> You are saying here that if it was the C:\ drive(confusing). I think that
> win98, winME etc. aren't able to configure with any drive letter other than
> c, but winNT and win2k can. I don't know that winXP can so I hope that what
> you are say
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Edward Croft
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:21 PM
> To: Red Hat List
> Subject: RE: I can't boot Windows XP with Grub loader.
>
> I have had this setup working for over a year now.
>
> On Tu
/2003 10:21 AM
To: Red Hat List
Cc:
Subject:RE: I can't boot Windows XP with Grub loader.
I have had this setup working for over a year now.
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:03, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> This is news to me. I didn't know that windows would even boot from a
I have had this setup working for over a year now.
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:03, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> This is news to me. I didn't know that windows would even boot from a slave
> drive. Good info if it is true.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL
look belowJoan Carles Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!I'm currently running RHL 9 on one hard disk (master). My boot loader is Grub. Now, I installed Windows XP (NTFS) in other hard disk (slave). The Grub detects the two operating systems but, when I select Windows XP, this do
This is news to me. I didn't know that windows would even boot from a slave
drive. Good info if it is true.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Edward Croft
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:55 AM
> To: Red Ha
I don't think windows will boot from a slave drive. The order you should
install windows on your primary drive then install RH. The reason that you
should install RH second is that windows will overwrite any OS boot loader
in the MBR. It has no respect. I don't see how you could have
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 12:16, Joan Carles Jimenez wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm currently running RHL 9 on one hard disk (master). My boot loader is Grub. Now,
> I installed Windows XP (NTFS) in other hard disk (slave). The Grub detects the two
> operating systems but, when I sel
>From most dual boot machines using Grub, Windows usually has to go first.
Since RH is much more relaxed then XP, I've usually seen RH second either on the 2nd
partition or slave drive. Since the MBR is real fussy it likes to have windows going
first then find RH. It maybe able to be
Hi!
I'm currently running RHL 9 on one hard disk (master). My boot loader is Grub. Now, I
installed Windows XP (NTFS) in other hard disk (slave). The Grub detects the two
operating systems but, when I select Windows XP, this does not boot. What's the
problem? Thanks.
Joan Carl
hello,
I'm munhyo.
Let me ask you questions about LILO parameter.
I am used to use serial output to display boot messages with 2.4.18 kernel
as follows,
append="console=/dev/ttyS0,115200" in lilo.conf file.
But redhat 7.3 with 2.4.18-3 does not work as serial output to display
/2003, you wrote:
Ian,
Someone correct me if I am wrong...but you can just comment out the image
you don't want it to boot to, and you should be fine..
jeff
-Original Message-
From: Ian L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Ian,
Someone correct me if I am wrong...but you can just comment out the image you don't
want it to boot to, and you should be fine..
jeff
-Original Message-
From: Ian L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: grub boot
At 05:40 PM 9/16/2003, you wrote:
> this is in my grub.conf file:
> if i change default=0 that should boot with the 2.4.20-20.8 kernel yes?
Yes but that's not the approved way to do it. It's safer to do:
grubby --set-default=/boot/vmlinuz-$version
(replace $version but th
After a 10 second delay.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian L
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: grub boot order question
>
> this is in my grub.c
> this is in my grub.conf file:
> if i change default=0 that should boot with the 2.4.20-20.8 kernel yes?
Yes but that's not the approved way to do it. It's safer to do:
grubby --set-default=/boot/vmlinuz-$version
(replace $version but the version number 2.4.20-2
this is in my grub.conf file:
#boot=/dev/hda
default=1
timeout=10
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
title Red Hat Linux (2.4.20-20.8)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.20-20.8 ro root=LABEL=/
initrd /initrd-2.4.20-20.8.img
title Red Hat Linux (2.4.18-14
/ partition.
>
> "root=LABEL=/" is a RH thing...doesn't work with vanilla kernels.
Hi Callan,
It actually works without a problem with vanilla kernels. The LABEL
feature is contained in the initrd code so as long as you supply a
properly built initrd you'll be able t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 13 September 2003 06:24, Kevin Breit wrote:
> Below is grub.conf:
>
> default=1
> timeout=10
> splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
> title Red Hat Linux (2.6.0-test5)
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.0-test5 ro root=L
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:36, Kevin Breit wrote:
> Hey,
> I compiled 2.6.0-test5 (latest) today and am having a hard time
> booting it. During boot, I get:
>
> Kernel panic. No kernel found. Trey passing init= to kernel.
>
> My .img file is specified in grub.conf
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 17:57, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:36:20 -0400
> Kevin Breit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> > I compiled 2.6.0-test5 (latest) today and am having a hard time
> > booting it. During boot, I get:
> &
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 17:57, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:36:20 -0400
> Kevin Breit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> > I compiled 2.6.0-test5 (latest) today and am having a hard time
> > booting it. During boot, I get:
> &
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:36:20 -0400
Kevin Breit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kevin,
> I compiled 2.6.0-test5 (latest) today and am having a hard time
> booting it. During boot, I get:
>
> Kernel panic. No kernel found. Trey passing init= to kernel.
>
The mes
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:36:20PM -0400, Kevin Breit wrote:
> Hey,
>I compiled 2.6.0-test5 (latest) today and am having a hard time
> booting it. During boot, I get:
>
> Kernel panic. No kernel found. Trey passing init= to kernel.
>
> My .img file is specified
Hey,
I compiled 2.6.0-test5 (latest) today and am having a hard time
booting it. During boot, I get:
Kernel panic. No kernel found. Trey passing init= to kernel.
My .img file is specified in grub.conf and does exist in the proper
directory. As does the kernel.
Any help would be
On Thursday 11 September 2003 08:02 pm, TOM DOLCE wrote:
> I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I
> entered "e" on boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added "single'
> to the end of it, then "b" to boot into sing
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:02:53 -0700
"TOM DOLCE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I entered "e" on
> boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added "single' to the end of it, the
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 17:02, TOM DOLCE wrote:
> I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I entered "e" on
> boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added "single' to the end of it, then
> "b" to boot into single user mo
I'm trying to boot to single-user mode to reset the root password. I
entered "e" on boot up to edit the kernel line in Grub and added "single' to the
end of it, then "b" to boot into single user mode. However, instead of going to
single user mode the syste
Hello Anthony,
> Actually, I did try booting up using the XP install
> disc, but it attempts to install XP. What should I do
> please?
Find a means to fix your XP boot loader. After that rerun lilo.
If you do have an XP rescue floppy you could build an El Torito CD from it
(man mki
Actually, I did try booting up using the XP install
disc, but it attempts to install XP. What should I do
please?
Thanks again.
--- Leonard den Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Thank you, but unfortunately, I don't have a
> floppy
> > drive with my laptop.
>
> And of course you have t
> Thank you, but unfortunately, I don't have a floppy
> drive with my laptop.
And of course you have tried booting from your XP installation CD
instead before sending back this reply :-/ .
Leonard.
--
How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste?
Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo
Thank you, but unfortunately, I don't have a floppy
drive with my laptop.
--- Leonard den Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> > I ran /sbin/lilo and got this fatal message:
> >
> > Added Linux *
> > Fatal: First sector of
Hello Anthony,
> I ran /sbin/lilo and got this fatal message:
>
> Added Linux *
> Fatal: First sector of /dev/hda1 doesn't have a valid
> boot signature
>
> Then when I attempted to reboot the system to Win XP.
> What I saw on the top left corner of the black s
ave a valid
boot signature
Then when I attempted to reboot the system to Win XP.
What I saw on the top left corner of the black screen
is this:
Loading Windows XP
L?
And that's all, and it hangs there.
I searched the Web, and found limited info about this.
One newsgroup post seems to sa
Thomas Fortner wrote:
Hi folks:
I added an IDE RAID controller and a second hard drive to my Red Hat 9
system, which moved the hard drive from hda to hdg. I found a couple
of places where I needed to change the (HD0,0) definition, such as
/boot/grub/device.map and /etc/sysconfig/grub. However
Hi folks:
I added an IDE RAID controller and a second hard drive to my Red Hat 9 system, which moved the hard drive from hda to hdg. I found a couple of places where I needed to change the (HD0,0) definition, such as /boot/grub/device.map and /etc/sysconfig/grub. However, I must have missed
Update your Lilo or Grub config to point to your partition and then make
it write it's values back to the boot recordOr use a gui tool to set
it up...it will handle the rest.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Cosmo Lee
Sent: Thu
Hello Cosmo,
> I've moved my hard drives from the built-in IDE controller to a PCI IDE
> card. What do I change to indicate to the OS to boot from the new
> partitions?
I assume you updated /etc/fstab, and installed your boot loader on the new
partitions. The rest is a matter o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 04 September 2003 09:57 pm, Gunawan wrote:
> Hi,
> How to create a boot disk for RH9?
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/install-guide/s1-steps-install-cdrom.html#S2-STEPS-MAKE-DISKS
- --
- -Michael
pgp key:
On Thursday 04 September 2003 20:57, Gunawan wrote:
> Hi,
> How to create a boot disk for RH9?
> Regards,
> Gunawan
Stick a floppy in and use the utility "mkbootdisk."
See "man mkbootdisk" for the particulars.
Regards, Mike Klinke
--
redhat-list mailin
Hi,
How to create a boot disk for RH9?
Regards,
Gunawan
RH 9 Intel
I've moved my hard drives from the built-in IDE controller to a PCI IDE
card. What do I change to indicate to the OS to boot from the new
partitions?
Previously, the OS booted from /dev/hda and there were partitions on
/dev/hdb also. When it boots now, I see it trying to find d
It doesn't sound like you have choosen to use LILO or GRUB. I've used
both and do exactly what you are wanting to doI think you are over
complicating the situation. Install LILO or GRUB to your MBR for your
linux disk if you wantthe linux vmlinuz boot up will not be in the
MB
Otto Haliburton pravi:
It sounds to me if you want to do what you want to do. Then use a
removable disk that is bootable. If you want to boot win2k install the
removable win2k disk. If you want linux install the removable linux
disk. With hard drives I don't think it is possible to have
It sounds to me if you want to do what you want to do. Then use a
removable disk that is bootable. If you want to boot win2k install the
removable win2k disk. If you want linux install the removable linux
disk. With hard drives I don't think it is possible to have each
independent wi
Cowles, Steve pravi:
Sasa Stupar wrote:
The thing is that I still want to be able to boot any of the systems
independently. This means I want to leave intact the MBR of each disk.
I use a slightly different approach to dual booting. Maybe it will work for
you.
I have linux installed on one hard
Sasa Stupar wrote:
> The thing is that I still want to be able to boot any of the systems
> independently. This means I want to leave intact the MBR of each disk.
I use a slightly different approach to dual booting. Maybe it will work for
you.
I have linux installed on one hard drive wit
t-list-
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 王仲俊
>>>Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:00 AM
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: Re: Two OS - boot?
>>>
>>>You can use XOSL Operating System Loader to do that.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
, September 04, 2003 3:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Two OS - boot?
You can use XOSL Operating System Loader to do that.
Hi folks,
I have two OS, winxp and RH8, both on separated drives and also both
with their own MBR installed. What I want to do is to create a boot
script to ask me what OS
r 04, 2003 3:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two OS - boot?
>
> You can use XOSL Operating System Loader to do that.
>
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I have two OS, winxp and RH8, both on separated drives and also both
> >with their own MBR installed. What I
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of ÍõÖÙ¿¡
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Two OS - boot?
You can use XOSL Operating System Loader to do that.
>Hi folks,
>
>I have two OS, winxp and RH8, both on separated drives and also both
>with t
You can use XOSL Operating System Loader to do that.
>Hi folks,
>
>I have two OS, winxp and RH8, both on separated drives and also both
>with their own MBR installed. What I want to do is to create a boot
>script to ask me what OS do I want to boot. Now I am using by default in
Hi folks,
I have two OS, winxp and RH8, both on separated drives and also both
with their own MBR installed. What I want to do is to create a boot
script to ask me what OS do I want to boot. Now I am using by default in
bios to search for floppy boot(linux) and if there is nothing then boot
RH 9 Intel
I've moved my hard drives from the built-in IDE controller to a PCI IDE
card. What do I change to indicate to the OS to boot from the new
partitions?
Previously, the OS booted from /dev/hda and there were partitions on
/dev/hdb also. When it boots now, I see it trying to find d
Hi folks:
I switched from a single hard drive to a hardware RAID configuration on
ministry1.prodigal.local, listed on "My Systems" on RHN. When I made this
change, it changed my boot drive from /dev/hda3 to /dev/hdg3. I went
through the configuration files to change the references for
Windows never honors other boot loaders in the mbr and will overwrite
them on a install. so you need to reinstall GRUB and that should fix you
up.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Haney
> Sent: Tuesday,
ing a boot floppy to boot into Redhat.
I tried to install GRUB on the MBR by running /sbin/grub-install /dev/hda but
when I rebooted the system, I am dumped at the grub> prompt.
I tried using GRUBConf to set up my boot menu, where it set up the menu in
/boot/grub/menu.lst The contents of t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Devil's Advocate
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dual-boot RH9/Windows XP using GRUB
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
I have Redhat 9 and Windows XP installed on the same system, and at the moment
I am using a boot floppy to boot into Redhat.
I tried to install GRUB on the MBR by running /sbin/grub-install /dev/hda but
when I rebooted the system, I am dumped at the grub> prompt.
I tried us
ev/hda: 0.000-38166.679 megabytes
> > Disk label type: msdos
> > MinorStart End Type Filesystem Flags
> > 1 0.031 20002.807 primary ntfsboot
> > 2 20002.808 20104.782 primary ext3
> > 3 20104.783 22018.776
gs
> 1 0.031 20002.807 primary ntfsboot
> 2 20002.808 20104.782 primary ext3
> 3 20104.783 22018.776 primary linux-swap
> 4 22018.777 38162.219 extended lba
> 5 22018.808 38162.219 logical ext3
> (parted)
>
&
Hi. I have a system (RH8) that has the following:
(parted) print
Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0.000-38166.679 megabytes
Disk label type: msdos
MinorStart End Type Filesystem Flags
1 0.031 20002.807 primary ntfsboot
2 20002.808 20104.782 primary ext3
tem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
> > kernel=/vmlinuz-2.4.20-8 ro root=/dev/hda6
Make it: root=/dev/hda7
(hd0,5) = /dev/hda6 is your /boot partition
(hd0,6) = /dev/hda7 is your / partition
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/TL880iMVcrivHFQRAiGI
x1ffbb000, 0x24c6e bytes]
> boot
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot, /sysroot/initrd) failed: 2
umount /initd/proc failed:2
freeing unused kernel memory: 132k freed
kernel panic: no init found. try passing init=option to kernel
here is the contents of t
- Original Message -
From: Marcos de Souza Trazzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 Aug 2003 08:14:24 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help - boot problems possibly from partition magic
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 05:24, richard yuwono wrote:
> > hi,
> >
>
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 05:24, richard yuwono wrote:
> hi,
>
> i had rh 9.0 and win2k running nicely on my box at home and recently i installed
> partition magic 8.0. after rebooting the grub splash screen no longer came up, but
> instead i got a grub prompt. i tried a boot disk
hi,
i had rh 9.0 and win2k running nicely on my box at home and recently i installed
partition magic 8.0. after rebooting the grub splash screen no longer came up, but
instead i got a grub prompt. i tried a boot disk which got a bit further but gave me
"kernel panic: no init found"
Unless you are using a laptop system, you do not need kernel-pcmcia-cs
installed.
Michael
--
Michael Viron
Core Systems Group
Simple End User Linux
>Use "rpm -qa | grep kernel" to see what kernels are installed. On my
>system this shows:
>
> kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-13
> kernel-source-
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:56:11 -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
>
> &
o completely
separate packages. Never would erasing a kernel package remove the
source package.
> The person who started the thread
> did expressly say that he used RHN and /boot was full. It should never
> be recommended that he uses rpm
Wrong. RHN => up2date installs packages via RPM
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:00:19 -0400, Kent Borg wrote:
> What Redhat recommends when undating your kernel is to use "-F" which
> will remove the old kernel, and /boot will not grow with each new
> kernel release.
Red Hat does _
1 - 100 of 1746 matches
Mail list logo
