On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 12:47, Justin Banks wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> > i'm getting frequent hangs recently.. but get this.. i attach to the
> > process with gdb, then just quit gdb, and it unhangs! how am i supposed
> > to track this down?
>
> Is this RH9? Do you really have the latest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> hello redhatters,
>
> i'm getting frequent hangs recently.. but get this.. i attach to the
> process with gdb, then just quit gdb, and it unhangs! how am i supposed
> to track this down?
Is this RH9? Do you really have the latest glibc and nptl? I see this happen
with
could be i just wasn't yet putting quite so heavy a
load on the machine back then?
is this happening to anyone else?
my best guess is it's some sort of latent scheduling bug, brought out
under load, that is, when i've got enough going to really call
significantly upon swap.
i only d
readdir: directory #131073 contains a hole at offset 0
> Sep 19 00:10:35 fibu1 kernel: Assertion failure in
> journal_bmap_Rsmp_1330f299() at journal.c:602: "ret != 0"
> Sep 19 00:10:35 fibu1 kernel: kernel BUG at journal.c:602!
> Sep 19 00:10:35 fibu1 kernel: invalid operand: 0
bu1 kernel: kernel BUG at journal.c:602!
Sep 19 00:10:35 fibu1 kernel: invalid operand:
Sep 19 00:10:35 fibu1 kernel: CPU:0
Sep 19 00:10:36 fibu1 kernel: EIP:
0010:[bcm5700:__insmod_bcm5700_O/lib/modules/2.4.7-10smp/kernel/drivers/n+-1
287720/96]
Sep 19 00:10:36 fibu1 kernel: EIP:0010:[]
Se
an
ext3 filesystem. The the largest & most active datbase file is around 8GB.
When typically running, free reports over 3GB used in cache, 200-400MB
swapped and low free memory. The MySQL process shows about 500MB ussage.
In researching this problem I found Redhat Bug #89226
(https:/
en able to investigate it in depth when it's happened, which
has been perhaps six times in the last year).
Well, the recent kernel upgrade to 2.4.20-20.7 mentions an obscure bug
fix (#100739) that seems to have something to do with VM and sounds like
it was discovered on Dell Machines with
Hello,
in rh9 redhat did the daring step to include the threading system nptl
into the kernel, although it is not official yet.
but this mistake causes several programs to crash. Some say due to a bug
in the implemantation. may it be or not.
fact is, i like to use transcode and cinelerra, to
Hi there,
I tried to patch my Linux kernel 2.4.20-8 i686 i386 GNU/Linux (on
redhat 9) with the linux-ppscsi patch so that I can add my parallel port
scanner to my pc.
I started as follows in the /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8/ directory
step 1. patch -p1 < linux.ppscsi.patch
step 2. make me
it seems sort is suffering from some subtle bug. i am wondering, is it
just my machine, is it a redhat problem, or is it actually a gnu bug?
for example, en_IN seems to produce proper results, but en_AU fails to
handle some special characters properly. but both of these locales use
the same
]
On Behalf Of Emmanuel Seyman
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bug tracking tool
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:40:10PM +0530, santosh kumar wrote:
>
> Guys really really fed up with bug tracking tool installation. I
I've no idea if it's easy
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:40:10PM +0530, santosh kumar wrote:
>
> Guys really really fed up with bug tracking tool installation. I
I've no idea if it's easy to install or not but have you tried mantis?
http://mantisbt.sourceforge.net/>
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
Hi all,
Guys really really fed up with bug tracking tool installation. I
searched a lot to get any free web based bug tracking tool but could not
be able to get it except bugzilla but bugzilla could not be able to
install. Please suggest any web based free bug tracking tool with easy
installation
I had a similar situation. The system clock was off by 1 hour. I would
reset the system clock and it would switch back to be 1 hour behind. The
problem was that the hardware clock and system clock were not synchronized.
Here is a link that talks about how to synchronize them.
http://www.craic.c
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 08:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Today's Topics:
>
>5. Re: bug in zoneinfo? (LAST FIRST)
>7. Re: bug in zoneinfo? (Todd A. Jacobs)
> --__--__--
Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:01:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: LAST FIRST <[EMAIL PROTE
On 16 Feb 2003, Mats Tegner wrote:
> live in Sweden, the timezone is set to Europe/Stockholm. Or is this a
> bug in the hardware clock. I'm running Red hat 8.0 with Kernel
> 2.4.18-24.8.0 on an IBM Intellistation M Pro 6219.
Have you set daylight savings properly? This sounds like
ime. If the time
>is 22:00 it shows 23:00. Is there a bug in the zoneinfo package? Since I
>live in Sweden, the timezone is set to Europe/Stockholm. Or is this a
>bug in the hardware clock. I'm running Red hat 8.0 with Kernel
>2.4.18-24.8.0 on an IBM Intellistation M Pro 6219.
Dear Friends,
My system is behaving strange, if I don't sync my system clock with a
network time-server, my system clock shows the wrong time. If the time
is 22:00 it shows 23:00. Is there a bug in the zoneinfo package? Since I
live in Sweden, the timezone is set to Europe/Stockholm. Or is t
e per three days. The following message is error
> > message:
> >
> > kernel bug at commit.c :535!
> > invalid operand :
> > binfint-misc autofs eepro100 ext3 jdb dpti20 aic7xxx sd_mod scsi_mod
> > CPU:0
> > EIP:0010:[] Not tainted
> > EFLAGS:00010
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 20:19, Brad Ching wrote:
> Hello everyone,happy new year!
> I install redhat7.3 (kernel 2.4.18-3 smp) for program server and i find it always
>die per three days.
> The following message is error message:
>
> kernel bug at commit.c :535!
> invalid op
Hello everyone,happy new year!
I install redhat7.3 (kernel 2.4.18-3 smp) for
program server and i find it always die per three days.
The following message is error
message:
kernel bug at commit.c :535!
invalid operand :
binfint-misc autofs eepro100 ext3 jdb dpti20
aic7xxx sd_mod
access my company's VPN thru my W2K laptop. If I can
(Bdo that, the rest is just play time for me.
(B
(BWell, to make a short story even shorter. Apparently,
(Bthere is a bug or limitation in the kernel of the FTP
(Bversion of RH8.0 that I have. Once, I upgrade to the
(B2.4.18-18.8.0 kern
Shorewall is firewall package. It provides canned config files to help
you get setup very quickly. If you are using the iptables stuff that is
stock, I highly recommend that you disable it, and switch to something
with a few more features.
Shorewall is provided on RPM [among other formats], and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
| *note: before installing this, I recommend you do this:
|
| chkconfig --level 345 ipchains off
| chkconfig --level 345 iptables off
Honestly - I'd recommend not turning off iptables.
Rather - run the canned script once, t
> One might think that. However, I was under the assumption
(B> that when the policy for the FORWARD chain is set to
(B> ACCEPT, which is the default for RH, you don't need to
(B> include any forwarding rules since everything should be
(B> forwarded.
(B
(BJeez - I don't think I've helped any
** Reply to message from "C. Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 06
Dec 2002 14:51:49 +0900 (JST)
> > Uhm, I'm no iptables expert, but shouldn't you have > >
> forwarding rules seeing
> > as you want to forward packets?
> >
> > ---
> > Edward Dekkers (Director)
> > Triple D Computer Services P/L
>
http://www.shorewall.net
Download it, RTFM, then use. Using the canned configs that are
availible for download in numberous areas - one of which is the
documentation area,
i.e.
http://www.shorewall.net/standalone.htm
http://www.shorewall.net/two-interface.htm
http://www.shorewall.net/three-inte
> Uhm, I'm no iptables expert, but shouldn't you have > >
(Bforwarding rules seeing
(B> as you want to forward packets?
(B>
(B> ---
(B> Edward Dekkers (Director)
(B> Triple D Computer Services P/L
(B
(BOne might think that. However, I was under the assumption
(Bthat when the policy for t
> iptables -P INPUT DROP
(B> iptables -A INPUT -i ! eth0 -j ACCEPT
(B> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
(B> ACCEPT
(B> iptables -A INPUT -j LOG --log-prefix "INPUT_DROP(FW): "
(B> --log-level 6
(B> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i eth0 -j REJECT --reject-with
(B> tcp-rese
Trying to set up RH8.0 as a router/firewall for a cable
(Bconnection, where the IP address for eth0 is obtained
(Bthrough DHCP. The IP address of eth1 is a local address of
(B192.168.1.1
(B
(BI have enabled ip_forwarding in /etc/sysctl.conf and
(Bverified it on reboot using cat
(B/proc/sys/n
You need to add it to your kernel boot-up. It depends on if you use
grub or lilo.
in lilo you will add an 'append="mem=3Dnopentium"
in grub, add it to your kernel line for each kernel you have i.e:
[/boot/grub/menu.lst]
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-4SGI_XFS_1.1 rw root=/dev/hda3 hdc=ide-scsi
dev
My box crashes every twenty minutes or so and I was
told that addeding "mem=nopentium" somewhere fixes that. Where do I add
that? FYI I'm running Red Hat 8.0 with the latest kernel updates from Red
Hat.
Thnx,
~Christopher
Gordon and all. Here is what I have from the test that you gave me to do.
The question how do I force the PHP to use /usr/sbin as the directory to
find the sendmail in??
I have tried:
--with-sendmail=/usr/sbin/sendmail
-And-
--with-sendmail-dir=/usr/sbin
Both of these don't work. It is like
Thanks Gordon. This is what I have.
sh-2.05b$
IFS=":"sh-2.05b$ IFS=":"
+ IFS=:
sh-2.05b$
ac_dummy="$PATH:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/etc:/etc:/usr/ucblib:/usr/lib"
+
ac_dummy=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/joel/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/etc:/etc:/usr/ucblib:/usr/lib
sh-2.05b$ ac
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:15, Joel Webb wrote:
>
> I am using RH 8.0 with sendmail. I needed to install PHP with mhash
> support and have recompiled it. After installing the new RPM binaries,
> I noticed I lost support for the mail() function.
>
> When I re-compiled, I noticed that the logs said t
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:31:10PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Does a FAQ exist for this list on usage and guidelines (much like you would
> see for a news group)? If so - perhaps reposting it in the interest of
> reminding those who offend would be in order.
On the RedHat Install List there are
3 cheers for Hal, my personal filter maintainer
--
Alan & Jan Harding
Tel: 07715 539272
"One by one the penguins are stealing my sanity"
--- Begin Message ---
> Yea, "Pros Only". If you want pros only, post to a f'n pros only list.
> This is a public list.
Does that mean there are no pros here
I am using RH 8.0 with sendmail. I needed to install PHP with mhash
support and have recompiled it. After installing the new RPM binaries,
I noticed I lost support for the mail() function.
When I re-compiled, I noticed that the logs said that it didn't find
sendmail, But sendmail is in its defau
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:31:10PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Does a FAQ exist for this list on usage and guidelines (much like you would
> see for a news group)? If so - perhaps reposting it in the interest of
> reminding those who offend would be in order.
This page should be read by *everyone
> Yea, "Pros Only". If you want pros only, post to a f'n pros only list.
> This is a public list.
Does that mean there are no pros here?
Bugger me, that's it. I'm moving.
(Keep up the good work Hal)
Regards,
---
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services P/L
--
redhat-list maili
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:22:11PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> >
> > There is no retaliation involved. If subject lines are phrased such
> > that the poster has shown respect for the reader, then it will pass the
> > procmail rules that Hal's posted so far.
>
> That's the way I f
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:22:11PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> There is no retaliation involved. If subject lines are phrased such
> that the poster has shown respect for the reader, then it will pass the
> procmail rules that Hal's posted so far.
That's the way I feel about it. Get home, bad d
Here is what I have received after grepping for sendmail in the logs
[joel@mail SPECS]$ cat bb.log | grep sendmail
checking for sendmail... no
checking for sendmail... no
Installing Mail/sendmail.php
Installing Mail/sendmail.php
--
Respectfully,
Joel Webb
WebbGroup Network Systems
www.webbgr
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:35:31PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> As for Mr Burgiss's filters - they too are becoming an annoyance. If you
> don't like it - delete it. Procmailing it by yourself is one thing (and
> entirely private), but openly sharing the rules with the list is more like
> covert re
Hi Rick,
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 8:35 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Pro$ Only!
RH8.0 and PHP Bug. [annoyance submission]":
R> As for Mr Burgiss's filters - they too are becoming an annoyance. If
R> you don't like it - delete it. Procmailing it by you
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:35:31PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> He was /dev/null-ing your e-mail (most likely because something you said
> offended him).
Yea, "Pros Only". If you want pros only, post to a f'n pros only list.
This is a public list.
--
Hal Burgiss
--
redhat-list mailing lis
ROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:15 PM
> Subject: Pros Only! RH8.0 and PHP Bug.
>
>
> >
> >
> > I am using RH 8.0 with sendmail. I needed to install PHP with mhash
> > support and have recompiled it. After installing the new RPM binaries,
>
>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Pros Only! RH8.0 and PHP Bug. [annoyance submission]
>
> I said Pros Only!
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> > New annoyance filter:
> >
> >:0
> >
ovember 20, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Pros Only! RH8.0 and PHP Bug.
>
>
> I am using RH 8.0 with sendmail. I needed to install PHP with mhash
> support and have recompiled it. After installing the new RPM binaries,
> I noticed I lost support for the mail() function.
>
> When I re-
Mike Burger asked:
> Silly question time...why not just install teh PHP rpms?
>
Because the default RPMs don't have mhash support compiled in. Why is that?
Because Red Hat doesn't ship with libmhash - can't link to something they
don't include.
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WA
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
Its the default for sendmail
Its located under /usr/sbin/sendmail
But it is a symbolic link mess. I removed the link and put in the
sendmail.sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail > /etc/alternatives/mta
/etc/alternatives/mta -> /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail
It sti
I said Pros Only!
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> New annoyance filter:
>
>:0
>* ^Subject: +(Re: )?pros only
>/dev/null
>
> Thanks for the addition!!!
>
>
--
Respectfully,
Joel Webb
WebbGroup Network Systems
www.webbgroup.net
336.841.7241
336.841.6068
-
Silly question time...why not just install teh PHP rpms?
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Joel Webb wrote:
>
>
> I am using RH 8.0 with sendmail. I needed to install PHP with mhash
> support and have recompiled it. After installing the new RPM binaries,
> I noticed I lost support for the mail() function.
>
New annoyance filter:
:0
* ^Subject: +(Re: )?pros only
/dev/null
Thanks for the addition!!!
--
Hal Burgiss
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I am using RH 8.0 with sendmail. I needed to install PHP with mhash
support and have recompiled it. After installing the new RPM binaries,
I noticed I lost support for the mail() function.
When I re-compiled, I noticed that the logs said that it didn't find
sendmail, But sendmail is in its defau
In the release notes RedHat had explain the reason of get rid of GnoRPM.
The KRPM and Ximian Red Carpet seems do not work in new system very well
neither. This is absolutely something that they have to improve.
For MySQL, I am experiencing the same problem. By changing the stack
size option, this
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 10:08, Edward Finlayson wrote:
> Firstly: Where is the package manager GnoRPM seems to be missing so I don't seem to
>have a GUI for RPM.
GnoRPM was removed from the distribution. It was buggy and
unmaintained. See the release notes for more info.
> Secondly and far
It seems like I had a problem with RedHat7.3 and MySQL.
I couldn't use the RPM version, had to -e and download source from mysql.
I don't remember what the problem was though.
I did not have any problems after installing from source.
steve
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/11/02 01:08PM >>>
Hi Everyone,
t;Redhat-List (E-mail)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: RH8.0 & MySQL BUG!!!Date:
11-11-02 18:46Hi Everyone,I've
just upgraded to 'Psyche' RH8.0 and found two things that worry
me.Firstly: Where is the package manager GnoRPM seems to be missing so I
don't seem to have a
Hi Everyone,
I've just upgraded to 'Psyche' RH8.0 and found two things that worry me.
Firstly: Where is the package manager GnoRPM seems to be missing so I don't seem to
have a GUI for RPM.
Secondly and far more troublesome MySQL as distributed with RH8.0 will not
allow ODBC conn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 09 November 2002 08:56 pm, Peter Zengota wrote:
> There is currently an open bug in BugZilla regarding this issue:
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68056
>
> Seems to be widespread issues with rpm in RedH
There is currently an open bug in BugZilla regarding this issue:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68056
Seems to be widespread issues with rpm in RedHat 8...
From: Michael Fratoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 09 November 2002 06:41 am, Michael Grosseck wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I noticed on several computers the same problem with the rpm-system.
> Sometimes if I erase or install a pakage the process goes sleeping and
> doesn't wake up again. I run
Hi folks,
I noticed on several computers the same problem with the rpm-system.
Sometimes if I erase or install a pakage the process goes sleeping and
doesn't wake up again. I run my machine all night long, but nothing
changed, the process is still sleeping. I just can kill the process.
But then I
For the record, one can:
- manually edit the /etc/wvdial.conf file
- manually create /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ppp0
The format of ifcg-ppp0 is poorly documented, but some help for it can be
found in the Red Hat 8 sysadmin guide.
--
"Whenever I feel blue, I start brea
t; duplicates. The problem is that the Python script invoked on the
> backend dies horribly. The bug has been assigned to someone in Red Hat
> QA, but there is unlikely to be any resolution in my lifetime.
Your conclusion is beyond me.
Does this one fix it for you?
ftp://people.redhat.com/hara
The bug has been assigned to someone in Red Hat QA, but there is
unlikely to be any resolution in my lifetime.
--
"Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again."
- Unknown
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:22:09 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> How do I report a bug to RedHat?
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9xGVF0iMVcrivHFQRAkF2AKCAZbNCIyuWjqy
http://bugzilla.redhat.com
HTH,
Jonathan
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 14:22, MartÃn Marqués wrote:
> How do I report a bug to RedHat?
>
> --
> Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
> si podés
How do I report a bug to RedHat?
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de
hat crash exactly?
What bug number is it?
> If there's no way around it in the configurator, what other options do
> I have for configuring my modem?
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9xEIn0iMVcrivHFQRAh/BAJ9EnhZwv8G/cUkeXwryLfStLLiAtgCcDnO4
nx
Has anyone found a workaround to the crashes in this configurator yet?
It's in bugzilla many, many times, with nary a peep from the fine folks at
Red Hat.
If there's no way around it in the configurator, what other options do I
have for configuring my modem?
--
"Whenever I feel blue, I start
Thank you, I've been pulling my hair out over this!. I installed redhat8
on a system, copied my standard passwd,shadow,group files over and it
cannot find any of my group ID's. I have one group that exceed that
length. It def. buggered it up, it reports that it can't find group ID's
for anything
I just installed RH8.0 and there seems to be an odd bug with /etc/group.
If an entry in the group file is longer than 635 characters, the group name
is not mapped to the group ID.
I'm using the same groups (both local and through NIS) as I was with RH7.2,
and there wasn't a problem be
Ok, then I have to answer myself...
:)
How do I submit this to redhat?
I think it's clearly a bug.
MfG
Rainer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11.10.2002 15:11
Please respond to redhat-list
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Su
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:23:47PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> I was on Mosfet's web site this afternoon and spotted an extract from
> Red Hat's kdebase rpm:
>
> - get rid of Taiwanese Flag in KDE (bug #70235)
>
> Curious as to what kind of bug requires re
I was on Mosfet's web site this afternoon and spotted an extract from
Red Hat's kdebase rpm:
- get rid of Taiwanese Flag in KDE (bug #70235)
Curious as to what kind of bug requires removing a flag, I went
over to Red Hat's bugzilla and tried to query bug #70235 .
It appea
Just upgraded to 8.0 from 7.3. I had previously used Bastille to setup
my firewall settings, but it doesn't yet support the new version.
Anyway, running firewall-config results in the following error:
firewall-config: relocation error: firewall-config: undefined symbol:
__ti7QDialog
Anyone else
for rh7.3 and others with latest glibc update:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75128
the solution is to downgrade to previous glibc version.
for rh8.0 default installation:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74943
I've solved the problem erasing the defa
The bug also affects glibc-2.2.5-30 in RH7.2 when updating your system with
up2date
Solution: Just roll back to the previous version of glibc (2.2.5-29)
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
nombre de Jon Cooper
Enviado el: lunes, 07 de octubre de 2002 17
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 15:53, Julio Gruskin - PWeb ONline! wrote:
> Same thing happened to me. I just went back to the old glibc library
> (2.2.4-29 in my case) and it worked.
>
Has anyone checked bugzilla? It is not a bug unless it is in bugzilla
according to several of the RH emps .
I know others have had problems with this, so I tested on my servers after
an upgrade (last week) and I don't notice any problems. One of my PHP
portals go hosed and cant connect to it from a web browser, but the other
3 and a webmail app that uses MySQL seem to work fine. I can even connect
to it
)
Asunto: mysql and glibc-2.2.5-40 bug
Just for our own sanity we tested this out on a clean 7.3 box.
We started with a clean RH7.3 install, installed mysql via up2date.
In mysql we reset the admin password and set the user table to allow
connections from everywhere.
At this point we can make a
Just for our own sanity we tested this out on a clean 7.3 box.
We started with a clean RH7.3 install, installed mysql via up2date.
In mysql we reset the admin password and set the user table to allow
connections from everywhere.
At this point we can make a connection to the box on 3306 and everyth
7; specified
> > Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information
> >
> > a googling for the problem came up with "it's a bug, or a feature, i don't
> > know". so which is it? and what's the best way to get around it?
et with the error:
>
> iptables v1.2.7 invalid TCP port/service `2049:2000:1080:3128' specified
> Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information
>
> a googling for the problem came up with "it's a bug, or a feature, i don't
>
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:43:37AM -0700, daniel wrote:
: iptables v1.2.7 invalid TCP port/service `2049:2000:1080:3128' specified
: Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information
Do you have the ipt_multiport.o module built?
Check under your /lib/modules//kernel/net/ipv4/netfil
re information
a googling for the problem came up with "it's a bug, or a feature, i don't
know". so which is it? and what's the best way to get around it? do i
have to make up a rule for each port?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jue 15 Ago 2002 13:53, Mike Burger wrote:
> Have you given any thought to upgrading to one of the latest releases,
> supported by the postfix group? They're well past the 2001 releases
> that RedHat's still using/putting out.
As I said, I am going to update the whole server to RH 7.3, whi
Have you given any thought to upgrading to one of the latest releases,
supported by the postfix group? They're well past the 2001 releases that
RedHat's still using/putting out.
Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> There's an annoying bug in Postfix from
There's an annoying bug in Postfix from the 7.1 powertools, and there doesn't
seem to be any updates. Anybody know about this?
It's not that important, becuase this weekend I'll update to 7.3, but I can't
imagine why there isn't an update, especially after seein
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 09:06:59AM +0200, Aad van Lieburg wrote:
> Hi,
> I read about a bug in RH7.2 iptables, due to debugging code, with NAT /
> mangle.
> Now I'm not sure about this: Is this bug still there in RH7.3?
>
>From www.netfilter.org homepage:
* This bug ha
Hi,
I read about a bug in RH7.2 iptables, due to debugging code, with NAT /
mangle.
Now I'm not sure about this: Is this bug still there in RH7.3?
smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 01:01:01 -0700, you wrote:
> find . -name "*.tar.gz" -print0 | xargs -0 tar xzf
>
>doesn't do what i would think it should do
In addition to the other answers given, I suspect find . -name "*.tar.gz"
-exec tar xzf {} \; would do what you want too.
___
gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> find . -name "*.tar.gz" -print0 | xargs -0 tar xzf
>
> doesn't do what i would think it should do
> instead it returns the list of tar.gz files with the error:
>
> tar: ./filename0.tar.gz: not found in archive
> tar: ./filename1.tar.gz: not found in arc
Hi Gabriel:
Since no one else has responded, I will give it a shot.
Offhand I would say that it is executing one tar command with
all the tarballs on the one command line. The first one is
used as the tarball and the rest are used as filenames to be
extracted from the tarball.
Try the followin
find . -name "*.tar.gz" -print0 | xargs -0 tar xzf
doesn't do what i would think it should do
instead it returns the list of tar.gz files with the error:
tar: ./filename0.tar.gz: not found in archive
tar: ./filename1.tar.gz: not found in archive
tar: ./filename2.tar.gz: not found in arch
ot;
Jul 22 14:45:04 spider kernel: Assertion failure in journal_bmap_R2ac88d7a()
at journal.c:602: "ret != 0"
Jul 22 14:45:04 spider kernel: kernel BUG at journal.c:602!
Jul 22 14:45:04 spider kernel: kernel BUG at journal.c:602!
Jul 22 14:45:04 spider kernel: invalid operand:
Ju
SkYE wrote:
> This is a very strange situation I've never encountered before. Both
> the root account and user account become inaccessible. Needless to say,
> without root there is little that can be done to fix the problem - I
> always have to do a complete re-install.
I don't have an ans
Hello all,
This is a very strange situation I've never encountered before. Both
the root account and user account become inaccessible. Needless to say,
without root there is little that can be done to fix the problem - I
always have to do a complete re-install.
OS: Redhat 7.3
Hardware: Sony PCG
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
