Le 17/09/2003 03:07, « Ravi Verma » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I managed to solve.
>
> Thanks for help.
>
> Regards.
*** I don't get it: Why is it so difficult to post a short mail like this
one WITH the solution!?
The good ol' habbits are getting lost gentlemen! Too many "Thanks I fou
I managed to solve.
Thanks for help.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Ravi Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows VPN Behind Linux Firewall
Friends:
I ha
Friends:
I have setup a Linux firewall using iptables. I am working on allowing
VPN connections using Microsoft VPN client from my to a Microsoft VPN
server at one of clients. The Microsoft VPN client initiating the
connection is behind the firewall and the Microsoft VPN server is
outside.
I am
TCPDUMP is a sniffer that copies the ip packets from your Ethernet to
the Display.
>From a console run tcpdump.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# tcpdump
tcpdump: listening on eth0 .
..
...
..
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinf
how do I use tcpdump? On what machine?
- Original Message -
From: Fryclau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: linux firewall
> You can watch your network and discover what's going on there...
> Use tcpd
35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux firewall
My printer is an hp deskjet 3820 which worked fine in the past until I
had
the changes to my win98 machine mentioned earlier.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003
ED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: linux firewall
> more info added :
>
> I run windows 98 on a Compaq Presario and RH8 on my HP Vectra vl). I
> connect to the internet via verizon dsl, through a Netgear router. Both
> the win98 machine and the RH8 machin
My printer is an hp deskjet 3820 which worked fine in the past until I had
the changes to my win98 machine mentioned earlier.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: linux firewall
> what&#
Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: John Salamone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:54 PM
>Subject: Re: linux firewall
>
>
>> Sorry about forgetting my configuration. I use v
2003 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: linux firewall
> Sorry about forgetting my configuration. I use verizon dsl which is
> connected to my netgear router which connects to 2 machines, a windows 98
> machine and a linux machine.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Rick Warner <[EMAIL PR
8, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: linux firewall
> On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 17:29, John Salamone wrote:
> > Is it possible for linux' firewall to prevent me from printing from my
linux machine to a windows 98 machine which hosts my printer? If so, what do
I need to do to solve this problem?
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:29
PM
Subject: linux firewall
Is it possible for linux' firewall to prevent me
from printing from my linux machine to a windows 98 machine which hosts my
printer? If so, what do I need to do to solve this problem? Any help wou
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 17:29, John Salamone wrote:
> Is it possible for linux' firewall to prevent me from printing from my linux machine
> to a windows 98 machine which hosts my printer? If so, what do I need to do to solve
> this problem? Any help would be greatly appreciate
Is it possible for linux' firewall to prevent me
from printing from my linux machine to a windows 98 machine which hosts my
printer? If so, what do I need to do to solve this problem? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks!!
The off the shelf software (close source/retail/etc) doesn't have near the
level of documentation that linux firewall has. If you Google: 'linux
firewall', there are about 188,000 results. There are at least eight (8)
real good examples of heavy duty firewall implemented on lin
ages of a consumer grade pre-built firewall:
>
> 1. Quick and easy to install.
> 2. Low maintenance. Most of them don't need a sysadmin at all.
> 3. High-tech looking packaging with lots of flashing lights.
> 4. Cheap.
> 5. Reasonably secure most of the time as long as you
7;t need a sysadmin at all.
3. High-tech looking packaging with lots of flashing lights.
4. Cheap.
5. Reasonably secure most of the time as long as you don't forward any
connections to boxes on your internal network.
Advantages of a customized Linux firewall:
1. Features: just try to f
Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco one.
I've got a Cisco 801 configured to dial-on-demand to a fleet management
clearing house. If I telnet to the cisco and use the 'connect' command to
pull down a web page it dials out, connects and then returns
80 32 60 43
> Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 11:35
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Laurent didier
> Objet : Re: Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
>
>
> On Monday 24 Febr
]; Laurent didier
Objet : Re: Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
On Monday 24 February 2003 9:41 am, Laurent didier wrote:
qq> have you an DNS resolution
No, but that shouldn't matter as I'm using IP address notation, i.e.
wget http://10.10.1.100/index.html
which relates to the followi
)
> FORLAN (http://www.forlan.com)
> tél : 03 84 21 00 10
> Gsm : 06 80 32 60 43
> Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 10:36
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Linux Fir
21 00 10
Gsm : 06 80 32 60 43
Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
-Message d'origine-
De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 10:36
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco one.
I've got a Cisco 801 configured to dial-on-demand to a fleet management
clearing house. If I telnet to the cisco and use the 'connect' command to
pull down a web page it dials out, connects and then returns the web page.
I've g
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 14:38, Javelin wrote:
> I would agree that there is something to be said for learning to batten
> down your linux boxen.
There is a lot to be said for that. Everyone should do it.
> However, keeping things behind a firewall is
> just good practice.
No one should think that
I would agree that there is something to be said for learning to batten
down your linux boxen. However, keeping things behind a firewall is
just good practice. Yes, it may give one a false sense of security, but
it also gives one a safe place to learn and grow; i.e. behind the
firewall. With a fir
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:21, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > Relying on the infallibility of your software and administration as your
> > only defense is [...] naive and dangerous.
Amen.
Why someone would choose to deprecate a tool which does no harm and
provides an ADDITIONAL la
with constant attention to detail everywhere...that's
the best way I know to do it.
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is the disadvantage of Linux firewall, r
Dave Ihnat wrote:
Relying on the infallibility of your software and administration as your
only defense is, to be blunt--and I have been in these posts, far more
than I usually am, because I'm quite worried that someone will believe
your approach--naieve and dangerous.
I agree. Anyone who wishes
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 02:01:49PM -0500, Kent Borg wrote:
> > With all due respect, not only is that a very misguided attitude, it's a
> > dangerous one to promulgate.
>
> First, a point of order: if you are sincere about the "with all due
> respect"-part, then don't suggest that I am a cracker.
Sigh. I don't normally get into this sort of thing, so I'll make it quick.
A simple iptables script that doesn't allow anything to come in from the
external interface generally takes me less than 5 minutes to set up (less if
I just copy it from another box).
The cost of 5 minutes of my day can be
I have been following this thread all day with equal amounts of amusement
and contempt. First of all, let me say that I by no means think that
firewalls are the silver bullet solution for network security. As others
have pointed out, firewalls can cause a false sense of security in some
cases. H
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Kent Borg wrote:
> These days Red Hat ships quite secure. Keep it up to date, use good
Oh, come on...is this a troll? I usually have to spend a whole day
installing a Red Hat box: an hour or two for the install, and the rest of
the day locking down the default configuration.
I would agree that there is something to be said for learning to batten
down your linux boxen. However, keeping things behind a firewall is
just good practice. Yes, it may give one a false sense of security, but
it also gives one a safe place to learn and grow; i.e. behind the
firewall. With
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> What are the different if I using RHL 8 as firewall, rather than using
> pre-built firewall. They say that the pre-built firewall come with
> hardened operating system, I think Linux already did.
A packet filter is a packet filter. Some of the commerci
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:01, Kent Borg wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:58:58AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:02:54AM -0500, Kent Borg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:56:23AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > > > We all urgently push you to implement a firewall...any
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:58:58AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:02:54AM -0500, Kent Borg wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:56:23AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > > We all urgently push you to implement a firewall...any firewall...
> >
> > No we don't (with or without smi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:02:54AM -0500, Kent Borg wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:56:23AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > We all urgently push you to implement a firewall...any firewall...
>
> No we don't (with or without smilies), I do not advise a firewall
> unless you are trying to protect s
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 22:59, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> I'm playing around with RHL 8 to set up firewall with iptables.
> With Pentium II 300, 64 MB, 4 GB SCSI HD, 2 NIC's 100 Mbps. I think it
> enough.
Enough if you use text mode. I run a good firewall on a Pentium/166 with
64 MB, a 1GB EIDE disk, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well said!
- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kent Borg
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is the disadvantage of Linux firewall, rather then
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:56:23AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> We all urgently push you to implement a firewall...any firewall...
No we don't (with or without smilies), I do not advise a firewall
unless you are trying to protect some MS Windows garbage and that is a
losing battle you are better off
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:56:23AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>
> > I'm playing around with RHL 8 to set up firewall with iptables.
> > With Pentium II 300, 64 MB, 4 GB SCSI HD, 2 NIC's 100 Mbps. I think it
> > enough.
>
> Nope--more memory required. At least 128.
Actually more memory is only req
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:59:11AM +0700, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> Management urgently push me to implement firewall in our system.
> Yes... we do not have firewall.
We all urgently push you to implement a firewall...any firewall...
(SmileyifIdidsmileyswhichIdon't).
> I'm playing around with RHL 8
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:59:11AM +0700, Budi Febrianto wrote:
> I'm playing around with RHL 8 to set up firewall with iptables.
> With Pentium II 300, 64 MB, 4 GB SCSI HD, 2 NIC's 100 Mbps. I think it
> enough.
Note that 64MB is not considered enough - Red Hat Linux 8 requires a
minimum of 128MB
A good choice is to use firewall builder and leaf.
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
http://www.fwbuilder.org/
it may help you
raymundo
Budi Febrianto wrote:
Hi,
Management urgently push me to implement firewall in our system.
Yes... we do not have firewall.
I'm playing around with RHL 8 to set up
Hi,
Management urgently push me to implement firewall in our system.
Yes... we do not have firewall.
I'm playing around with RHL 8 to set up firewall with iptables.
With Pentium II 300, 64 MB, 4 GB SCSI HD, 2 NIC's 100 Mbps. I think it
enough.
I configure firewall based on Rusty's IPTABLES How to
From: Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 29 November 2002 01:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: problems setting up NT Mailserver inside linux firewall
>
>
> I'm setting up a linux firewall and moving an NT Mail server
> onto a new network behind this firewa
5.5, you'll need to set it up. Give these a look and let us
know.
<>
--
-- Original Message ---
From: "Lisa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:47:44 -
Subject: problems setting up NT Mailserver inside linu
I'm setting up a linux firewall and moving an
NT Mail server onto a new network behind this firewall.
The machine where the firewall resides has one
internal interface and one external interface. Dummy ip addresses are
used for machines on the LAN inside the firewall.
At the momen
AT (on the box it says it does). I just spent 1 hour digging through
> every menu and see no way to configure NAT.
>
> Question regarding the Linux firewall project. Can a Linux firewall
> support most of the features of the PIX firewalls?
>
> I need to do the following (a
I just bought a linksys 4 port DSL router/gateway that supposedly does
NAT (on the box it says it does). I just spent 1 hour digging through
every menu and see no way to configure NAT.
Question regarding the Linux firewall project. Can a Linux firewall
support most of the features of the PIX
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sorry folks that reply was intended for a different thread.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>>Instead of having each machine retreive its mail from the internet, I
>>want to have one machine do all retreival and the others to be aimed
>>at it as there pop server.
>
> Sure, you're already on the right track ... you just
ay, March 15, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> Hello...
>
> Here is the details of my network.
>
> External:
> 100MB connection to our ISP who is providing our primary dns services
> li
OP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> Can you give us a detailed description of what your network looks like,
> along with some network hardware descriptions?
>
> -- Jonathan
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gre
: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> Hello...
>
> Well, except the internal network is the only slow section with
> smtp,pop3,ftp, etc From the outside world pop3, http, etc are fine?
>
> Still Puzzled
>
> --
March 14, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> Could it have been a network issue on your ISP's side?
> -- Jonathan
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg Caskey" <[EMAIL
Could it have been a network issue on your ISP's side?
-- Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Caskey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Greg Caskey wrote:
> >
> >
> > 1. The 2nd NIC's IP addr
SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Greg Caskey wrote:
> >
> >
> > 1. The 2nd NIC's IP address is 10.0.0.1 for the internal machines.
Would my
> > named.conf look like thi
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Greg Caskey wrote:
>
>
> 1. The 2nd NIC's IP address is 10.0.0.1 for the internal machines. Would my
> named.conf look like this:
>
> options {
> directory "/var/named";
> };
Make it this:
options {
directory "/var/named";
for
: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from internal windoze
machines to linux firewall (gateway)
Hi...
Thanks for your reply. My questions on this are as follows:
1. The 2nd NIC's IP address is 10.0.0.1 for the internal machines.
1
nameserver ISP backup 1 IP
nameserver ISP backup 2 IP
Is there anything else I need to setup?
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Emmanuel Seyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP con
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:13:43AM -0700, Greg Caskey wrote:
>
> My question then is how do I change this.
> I have added the line to the /etc/hosts file: (which made netstat -r fast)
> 10.0.0.1 fqdn alias
I believe you'll need to run a cacheing nameserver on the machine (there's
a rpm on the C
Can anyone offer any advice on how to correctly configure the firewall that
comes with RH7.2 to allow direct messaging via LICQ. Sending through the
server isn't very reliable for some reason.
TIA.
--
Samuel Cox
samecoxATswbell.net
___
Redhat-list
Title: VPN behind linux firewall/router
Hi,
I will be getting a cable connection next week and are in the
process of setting up a RH7.2 router/firewall to use it with
my local network (Stand alone PC and laptop).
My employer is rolling out Securepoint Securemote VPN software
so employees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet connection between
>several
> computers. Problem is, I only have an old 420meg harddrive to use (rest of system
>is Cyrix 166
> w/64meg RAM). Is this possible?
>
I was running
At 06:40 PM 10/12/00 , Kevin Holmquist wrote:
>connection, etc. etc. Realistically, you shouldn't notice a difference (I
>have more trouble with lag from Battlenet than anything else!).
Amen!
>One final note: (legal disclaimer on) check with your isp before you set
>this up. In my case I had
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jamin Collins wrote:
> IIRC, LRP does only routing and masq'ing. He's looking to do Apache and
> possibly Sendmail too.
>
Hmm...well, he COULD do those on another machine... :-) What I've
heard from people who've done it, is that it's better to have the
firewall/router on on
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet connection between
>several
> computers. Problem is, I only have an old 420meg harddrive to use (rest of system
>is Cyrix 166
> w/64meg RAM). Is this possible?
>
A
IIRC, LRP does only routing and masq'ing. He's looking to do Apache and
possibly Sendmail too.
Jamin W. Collins
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Linux firewall/rout
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet connection between
>several
> computers. Problem is, I only have an old 420meg harddrive to use (rest of system
>is Cyrix 166
> w/64meg RAM). Is this possible?
>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:16:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet
> connection between several computers. Problem is, I only have an old
> 420meg harddrive to use (rest of system is Cyrix 166 w/64meg RAM). Is
> this
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Dan Horth wrote:
> Mikkel - could you give us some pointers as to how you've set up the
> SPAM filtering and forwarding to the "real" sendmail server within
> your network? I'd be very interested in setting up a similar system
> here...:)
>
> TIA - dan.
>
For the SPAM fi
Kevin Holmquist wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> My first firewall was a pentium 100, 32 meg ram, 850 meg hard drive, and no
> video card, so yes it can be done. There are a couple of gotchas, though.
>
> First, forget about running anything else except a firewall. Second,
> although it may be possib
Hi Jason,
My first firewall was a pentium 100, 32 meg ram, 850 meg hard drive, and no
video card, so yes it can be done. There are a couple of gotchas, though.
First, forget about running anything else except a firewall. Second,
although it may be possible to install Linux without video, I
Mikkel - could you give us some pointers as to how you've set up the
SPAM filtering and forwarding to the "real" sendmail server within
your network? I'd be very interested in setting up a similar system
here...:)
TIA - dan.
At 1:20 PM -0500 12/10/00, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>I am running
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Jamin Collins wrote:
> It is possible to get Linux installed a route and more on a 420 MB drive.
> However it can become a little cramped and (if not partitioned properly) be
> taken out by log floods. It is very feasible and I'm sure that some of the
> people on this list ar
At 12:16 PM 10/12/00 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet connection
>between several
>computers. Problem is, I only have an old 420meg harddrive to use (rest
>of system is Cyrix 166
>w/64meg RAM). Is this possible?
&g
day, October 12, 2000 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux firewall/router on 420M drive? Plus other questions...
I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet connection
between several
computers. Problem is, I only have an old 420meg harddrive to use (rest of
system is Cy
Hi jprice,
jvc> 3) Is there a definitive source on linux firewalls and/or ipchains?
I think this is as definitive as it gets. Has info on all the masqing
versions plus links to all the modules and tricks for getting different
things to work through the firewall.
http://members.home.net/ipmasq/
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet connection between
>several
> computers. Problem is, I only have an old 420meg harddrive to use (rest of system
>is Cyrix 166
> w/64meg RAM). Is this possible?
&g
Answers below
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 1:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Linux firewall/router on 420M drive? Plus other
> questions...
>
> I want to setup a Linux
e less and
live perfectly fine using the Serial as video output! =)
2. Actually when I had a linux firewall box using a dialup 56k modem I had a
lower ping in games (i.e. Half-Life) then having the 56k modem in my
computer. Linux is just a lot more efficient networking box...
3. Do a search on goog
I want to setup a Linux firewall/router to share my internet connection between several
computers. Problem is, I only have an old 420meg harddrive to use (rest of system is
Cyrix 166
w/64meg RAM). Is this possible?
I have minimal experience with RH6.2 and have no experience with ipchains. If
84 matches
Mail list logo
