/
Twitter: @RickGarnetthttps://twitter.com/RickGarnett
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Brownstein
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 1:22 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
and worshipping our Lord Jesus Christ.
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 8:27 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
Mark Scarberry writes We
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:33 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More importantly, both Chip
Lupu/Bob Tuttle and Doug Laycock have
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:33 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More importantly, both Chip
Lupu/Bob Tuttle and Doug Laycock have
:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marty Lederman
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:33 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More
...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marty Lederman
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:33 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More importantly
for Law Academics
*Subject:* recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More importantly, both
Chip Lupu/Bob Tuttle and Doug Laycock have excellent posts up as part of
the SCOTUSblog symposium, which I commend to all of you:
Chip/Bob:
http
:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marty Lederman
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:33 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More importantly, both Chip
Lupu/Bob Tuttle and Doug Laycock have excellent posts up as part of the
SCOTUSblog symposium, which I commend to all of you
issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* recommended Hobby Lobby posts
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More importantly, both
Chip Lupu/Bob Tuttle and Doug Laycock have excellent posts up as part of
the SCOTUSblog symposium, which I commend to all of you:
Chip/Bob:
http
With regard to Jim's post (and Chip and Bob's piece), I appreciate the argument
that in employment cases RFRA should be interpreted the same way that Title VII
has been interpreted --- essentially denying all RFRA claims that would impose
more than de minimis costs on third parties or the
Alan: I'll let Chip speak for himself, but I don't think the relevant
distinction is so much between employment cases and all others as it is
between cases *in the commercial sector *(especially claims brought by
for-profit enterprises) and all others. In *Piggie Park*, for example, the
harm was
Very good questions, Alan. Three replies (in reverse order of your
questions):
1. Other rights contexts (like free speech) where third party costs are
present -- Religion is different. The Establishment Clause is a limit on
the government's power to authorize one party to act on religious
Subject: Re: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
Very good questions, Alan. Three replies (in reverse order of your questions):
1. Other rights contexts (like free speech) where third party costs are
present -- Religion is different. The Establishment Clause is a limit on the
government's power
...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 3:44 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
Very good questions, Alan. Three replies (in reverse order of your questions):
1. Other rights
: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
Very good questions, Alan. Three replies (in reverse order of your
questions):
1. Other rights contexts (like free speech) where third party costs are
present -- Religion is different. The Establishment Clause is a limit on
the government's power to authorize one
, February 20, 2014 3:44 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: recommended Hobby Lobby posts
Very good questions, Alan. Three replies (in reverse order of your questions):
1. Other rights contexts (like free speech) where third party costs are
present -- Religion is different
I have some further posts up on Balkinization. More importantly, both Chip
Lupu/Bob Tuttle and Doug Laycock have excellent posts up as part of the
SCOTUSblog symposium, which I commend to all of you:
Chip/Bob:
18 matches
Mail list logo
