; even covered under Part 15. A lot has changed over
>> > the years.
>> >
>> > Fred
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>> > Of Dexter McIntyre
e-
> > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
> > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:33 PM
> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man
&g
t; -Original Message-
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:33 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man
> charged w
motarolla_doctor wrote:
>
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Otterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
> >
>
> This IS correct, radar uses a transmitter and ALL transmitters are
> required to be licensed. I am sure he does not
At 11:12 AM 7/22/2005, Jim B. wrote:
>Mike Pugh wrote:
> > Whether he DID or DID NOT do anything illegal is up to the courts to
> > decide. Apparently, one can infer from the arresting officer's actions
> > that the officer had probable cause to arrest him based on what he
> > observed Mike
>
>
Mike Pugh wrote:
> Whether he DID or DID NOT do anything illegal is up to the courts to
> decide. Apparently, one can infer from the arresting officer's actions
> that the officer had probable cause to arrest him based on what he
> observed Mike
No-only that he THOUGHT he did.
--
Jim Barbo
Whether he DID or DID NOT do anything illegal is up to the courts to
decide. Apparently, one can infer from the arresting officer's actions
that the officer had probable cause to arrest him based on what he
observed Mike
Jim B. wrote:
> Mike Pugh wrote:
>
>>But it also tends to get one ar
Not For nothing.
I once owned a Crown Vic Bought it from a police auction complete
with the Bolted Transmission.
It was an old PA state Police chase car can you say Fast YEP. But the
speed limit is Only 65.
when I lived in NY I was involved in law enforcement. also my local
OEM.
I ha
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Neal Newman wrote:
> Yeah Right USDHS is the First step to being American Nazis
> I Vant to see your papers you need to carry your birth certificate
> or passport upstate NY without Leaving the state.
> I know it happened to me. First thing Customs needs to do is to ge
Likewise, well said!
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Fred Fitte wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I am a retired LE office. If it is such a big deal, then there should be a
> statute that prohibits its use In a motor vehicle. I may not care for a lot
> Of things people do, but they should not get in trouble for it. W
Dave VanHorn wrote:
> At 05:38 AM 7/22/2005, Mike Pugh wrote:
>
>>But does it pass the common sense test? I agree, it is legal and within
>>our rights to possess the thing, but knowing that possession alone could
>>possibly get you into trouble,
>
>
> Isn't that an oxymoron?
Right. 'Getting int
BRAVOMy whole point exactly.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim B.
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:02 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driv
Mike Pugh wrote:
> But it also tends to get one arrested.. So, unless you're a cop, or are
> not wishing to invite trouble, why have one? Mike
But how can someone be arrested if they didn't do anything illegal
If that's why the guy was given a ticket, the cop should be arrested,
and taken of
>--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Otterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
>
This IS correct, radar uses a transmitter and ALL transmitters are
required to be licensed. I am sure he does not have a license.
>
> >Having a rad
Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 6:38 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
due to ham antennas
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
due to ham antennas
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Otterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
>
This IS
-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 6:38 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
But does it pass
At 05:38 AM 7/22/2005, Mike Pugh wrote:
>But does it pass the common sense test? I agree, it is legal and within
>our rights to possess the thing, but knowing that possession alone could
>possibly get you into trouble,
Isn't that an oxymoron?
> and knowing that you had no need to own
>it besides
t is legal.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:50 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with '
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Otterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
>
This IS correct, radar uses a transmitter and ALL transmitters are
required to be licensed. I am sure he does not have a license.
>
> >Having a radar
sday, July 21, 2005 9:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
Fred Fitte wrote:
>Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
>
>
>
But using it on the highway can get you
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
But it also tends to get one arrested.. So, unless you're a cop, or are
not wishing to invite trouble, why have one? Mike
Fred Fitte wrote:
> Having a radar unit is perfectl
man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Jeff Otterson wrote:
> I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
It's been said before that Jerry runs a communications shop; don't most
shops own a repeater or three and have Part
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
Jeff
At 08:46 PM 7/21/2005, you wrote:
>Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
>
>Fred
>
>-Original Mes
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Otterson
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:16 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
Jeff
At 08:46 PM
: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
rear deck behind the deck speaker? I looked for one on the driver's
side, but couldn't positively make out that there was a light there.
Looks
Yeah Right USDHS is the First step to being American Nazis
I Vant to see your papers you need to carry your birth certificate
or passport upstate NY without Leaving the state.
I know it happened to me. First thing Customs needs to do is to get
rid of the Mexican looking officers out of NY
At 11:13 PM 7/21/2005, mch wrote:
>Mike Pugh wrote:
> >
> > mch wrote:
> >
> > > I know lots of hams who have EmCom vehicles under their own authority.
> > > You don't need permission to put one together. You only need permission
> > > of a PS agency to put transmit in an authorized radio, but the
Mike Pugh wrote:
>
> mch wrote:
>
> > I know lots of hams who have EmCom vehicles under their own authority.
> > You don't need permission to put one together. You only need permission
> > of a PS agency to put transmit in an authorized radio, but the radios
> > never came into play here - just t
ehalf Of Eric
> > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:43 PM
> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
> > due to ham antennas
> >
> > Well I went to the website posted and saw a picture of
mch wrote:
> I know lots of hams who have EmCom vehicles under their own authority.
> You don't need permission to put one together. You only need permission
> of a PS agency to put transmit in an authorized radio, but the radios
> never came into play here - just the antennas.
I know some of the
I know lots of hams who have EmCom vehicles under their own authority.
You don't need permission to put one together. You only need permission
of a PS agency to put transmit in an authorized radio, but the radios
never came into play here - just the antennas. I have about 7 antennas
on my vehicle -
it is perfectly legal.
> >
> >Fred
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
> >Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:43 PM
> >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [
Kris Kirby wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Jeff Otterson wrote:
>
>>I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
>
>
> It's been said before that Jerry runs a communications shop; don't most
> shops own a repeater or three and have Part 90 license? Perhaps he was out
> for a test
Or at least a wag! :-) Mike
Ken Arck wrote:
> At 08:45 PM 7/21/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
>>rear deck behind the deck speaker?
>
>
> <---Looks like a set of wig-wags to me...
>
> Ken
> -
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Jeff Otterson wrote:
> I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
It's been said before that Jerry runs a communications shop; don't most
shops own a repeater or three and have Part 90 license? Perhaps he was out
for a test drive that day to test the radar uni
Fred Fitte wrote:
>Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
>
>
>
But using it on the highway can get you in trouble. I know someone who
almost got boxed up by a group of 18 wheelers when they figured out the
signal lighting up their radar detectors was coming from a personal
vehicle. A l
sday, July 21, 2005 8:43 PM
>To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
>due to ham antennas
>
>Well I went to the website posted and saw a picture of jerry's
>car.
>I would like jerry to
At 08:45 PM 7/21/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
>rear deck behind the deck speaker?
<---Looks like a set of wig-wags to me...
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arco
; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:43 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
> due to ham antennas
>
> Well I went to the website posted and sa
Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:43 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driv
Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
rear deck behind the deck speaker? I looked for one on the driver's
side, but couldn't positively make out that there was a light there.
Looks to me like Jerry is in deep doo doo... Mike
Eric wrote:
> Well I went to the webs
Well I went to the website posted and saw a picture of jerry's
car.
I would like jerry to explain why he has a Traffic Radar gun sitting
on his dash, (zoom in on the dash) I think that might have been a
factor in his getting arrested. Being a Ham and also a police officer
I see allot of hams that
At 06:12 AM 7/21/2005, you wrote:
>Could someone send me the URL to the original article off line. I have a
>friend in the NC Highway Patrol who is interested and is questioning whether
>this really happened. Please send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Thanks,
>
>Fred
Hi, Fred (and all)
It happened. I
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Holman
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:50 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
back in 1976 I was at a ham swap and this dude had a old speed
PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
car' due to ham antennas
>
> K-55's on X band are still very much in use in New Jersey, which, at one
> time (maybe still) had the highest per-capita number of radar units in
> service. N
K-55's on X band are still very much in use in New Jersey, which, at one
time (maybe still) had the highest per-capita number of radar units in
service. NJ state law still requires X band radar for the State Police!
They're still using most of the units that they bought when the national 55
speed
ater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
due to ham antennas
> As an amateur radio operator and 30 year law enforcement
> veteran, I agree with you Lance. After blowing up the
> photo of the 1995 Caprice displayed on the jars webpage,
> I'm somewhat
The problem is selective enforcement AND too much spare time on
their hands. Instead of horassing thoes who would help them in a
time of need, they should be nailing drunk driver and putting then
in jail. I just watched a Sherrif Deputy sitting at an intersection
and about 10 cars ran the STOP
Jim B. wrote:
> So I don't believe any dept
> should still be using them. I know NO ONE here in NE Ohio that uses
> 10Ghz radar anymore.
I should add that they don't use 10Ghz units for issuing tickets anymore...
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the
ch
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim B.
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 3:52 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a
cop car' due to ham antenna
Frank R. Vondra wrote:
> As an amateur radio operator and 30 year law enforcement
> veteran, I agree with you Lance. After blowing up the
> photo of the 1995 Caprice displayed on the jars webpage,
> I'm somewhat curious to know why the defendant has an
> MPH K-55 mobile radar unit mounted on the d
rom: "Fred Fitte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop
>car' due to ham antennas
>Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:02:06 -0400
>
>Gents,
>
>Rece
ater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a cop car'
due to ham antennas
As an amateur radio operator and 30 year law enforcement
veteran, I agree with you Lance. After blowing up the
photo of the 1995 Caprice displayed on the jars webpage,
I'm somewhat curious to know why t
As an amateur radio operator and 30 year law enforcement
veteran, I agree with you Lance. After blowing up the
photo of the 1995 Caprice displayed on the jars webpage,
I'm somewhat curious to know why the defendant has an
MPH K-55 mobile radar unit mounted on the dash? I'm sure
it's not for chasing
55 matches
Mail list logo
